Abstract
Melanoma is a common skin tumor that causes a high rate of mortality, especially in Europe, North America and Oceania. Immunosuppressants such as anti-PD-1 have been used in the treatment of malignant melanoma, however, nearly 60% of patients do not respond to these treatments. Sema4D, also called CD100, is expressed in T cells and tumor tissues. Sema4D and its receptor, Plexin-B1, play crucial roles in the process of immune regulation, angiogenesis, and tumor progression. The role of Sema4D in melanoma with anti-PD-1 resistance is poorly understood. Through a combination of molecular biology techniques and in silico analysis, the role of Sema4D in improving anti-PD-L1 sensitivity in melanoma was explored. The results showed that the expression of Sema4D, Plexin-B1 and PD-L1 was significantly increased in B16-F10R cells. Sema4D knockdown synergizes with anti-PD-1 treatment, cell viability, cell invasion and migration were significantly decreased, while the apoptosis was increased, the growth of tumors on the mice was also inhibited. Mechanistically, bioinformatics analysis revealed that Sema4D is involved in the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway; the downregulation of p-PI3K/PI3K and p-AKT/AKT expression were observed in Sema4D knockdown, therefore, nivolumab resistance is related to Sema4D and Sema4D silencing can improve sensitivity to nivolumab via inhibition of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.
Keywords: Sema4D, Melanoma, Nivolumab, PI3K/AKT, PD-1 inhibitor resistance
Introduction
Melanoma, which is prevalent in Europe and North America, has been on the rise in recent years (Rodriguez-Cerdeira et al., 2017). Melanoma is the most aggressive and fatal skin cancer, which can easily metastasize to the whole body through lymph and blood vessels. If the tumor metastasizes to distant and visceral organs, the 5-year survival rate is only 15–20% (Eggermont, Spatz & Robert, 2014; Huang & Zappasodi, 2022). Surgery is an important treatment for melanoma, chemotherapy such as paclitaxel and cisplatin are also effective, and immunotherapy such as anti-PD-1/PD-L1 also plays an important role in changing the survival rate of melanoma (Miller & Mihm Jr, 2006). Because cutaneous melanoma is often associated with UV exposure and elevated tumor mutational load, it is one of the most immunogenic of all cancer types and one of the most effective for immunotherapy (Melixetian, Pelicci & Lanfrancone, 2022).
Immune checkpoints such as programmed cell death protein-1(PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1(PD-L1) play an important role in immunotherapy. PD-L1 is distributed in tumor cell and PD-1 is generally distributed in T-cells, when PD-L1 bind to its receptor PD-1, triggers inhibitory signaling to attenuate T cell activity (Sun, Mezzadra & Schumacher, 2018). PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab can prevent the binding of PD-1 to PD-L1, thus restoring T cell activity and killing melanoma, non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) and other tumors (Larkin et al., 2015; Ribas et al., 2015; Weber et al., 2015). However, clinical evidence indicated that there are only 30–40% of patients receiving PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors could achieve a complete response (Hugo et al., 2016). Furthermore, there are a growing subset of responders acquired resistance within two years after treatment in melanoma (Robert et al., 2015a; Robert et al., 2015b). Therefore, it is an urgent to find new biomarkers with predictive value for melanoma or other solid tumors that are ineffective or resistance in the treatment of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors, and ultimately improve the efficacy of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors.
Semaphorins is involved in regulating tumor growth and metastasis. Especially in the tumor microenvironment, the disturbance between different cell types can control the development and progression of cancer (Lontos et al., 2018; Valentini et al., 2021). Semaphorin 4D (Sema4D) is a member of the semaphorins, which plays a important role in the progress of immunoregulatory, platelet inactivation, angiogenesis stimulation and bone formation regulation (Lontos et al., 2018). Sema4D is upregulated in most tumor tissues, such as prostate, colon, breast, melanoma, head, and neck carcinomas (Liu et al., 2015). As a ligand of Plexin-B1, Sema4D plays important roles in tumor cell proliferation, survival, and migration (Ch’ng & Kumanogoh, 2010).
The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/AKT) pathway is involved in the occurrence and development of melanoma. lncRNA OR3A4, GRB2 and Hey1 can promote melanoma migration and invasion via this signaling pathway (Shayan et al., 2017). When PI3K combines with GRB2, it will be phosphorylated and recruited to the cell membrane, then AKT phosphorylatedand acts on its target genes to regulate a variety of cellular processes (Yu et al., 2006).
In this study, we use a combination of molecular biology techniques and bioinformatics to explore the roles of Sema4D in anti-PD-1 resistance melanoma. We demonstrated for the first time that Sema4D is involved in anti-PD-1 resistance in melanoma. Moreover, Sema4D deficiency can overcome resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy and the mechanism is related to PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.
Materials and Methods
Cell culture and B16-F10 resistance cell line establishment
293T cells, B16-F10 were purchased by Nanjing Cobioer Biotechnology Co., LTD (Nanjing, China), cultured at 37 °C in 5% CO2 in RPMI-1640 (Life Technologies, Invitrogen, Canada) with 10% FBS (Gibco, Billings, MT, USA). The combination of high dose shock and gradually increasing dose was applied to establish the cell lines insensitive to nivolumab (anti-PD-1). The B16-F10 cell line in the logarithmic growth phase were cultured with nivolumab (AbMole Bioscience Inc., Shanghai, China) 10 ng/mL and TIL at a 1:5 ratio. After 24 h, the solution was changed, and dead cells were discarded. The remaining cells were then cultured with RPMI-1640 without nivolumab, when the remaining cells have stabilized, then cultured with nivolumab 25 ng/ml and repeat these steps until the cells could grow continuously and stably in the medium with nivolumab 50 ng/mL, and then cultured drug-free for 1 month, B16-F10 resistance cell line (B16-F10R) were obtained. B16-F10R also needs with nivolumab 5 ng/mL to maintain the resistance (Maeda, Lafreniere & Jerry, 1991).
Tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL)
The tumors were removed from the Balb/c mice, about 2–3 cubic millimeters in size, and cultured with two mL complete medium in 24 well plates. The complete medium included 6,000 IU/mL IL-2 which purchased from Novartis (Basel, Switzerland), RPMI-1640 and 2.05 mM L-glutamine were the major components and purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA), there is also a need to add 10% heat-inactivated human AB serum (Omega Scientific, Westlake Village, CA, USA), 55 µM 2-mercaptoethanol and 10 mM of HEPES Buffer (Mediatech, Hsinchu, Taiwan), gentamicin (50 µg/mL), penicillin (100 I.U./mL), streptomycin (100 µg/mL) were purchased from Invitogen and prevent infection (Arneth, 2019).
Western blotting
We investigated the expression of PD-L1, Sema4D, Plexin-B1, PI3K, p-PI3K, AKT and p-AKT. Antibodies against these proteins were purchased from Abcam Shanghai Trading Co., LTD and cell signaling technology, Inc. (Shanghai, China). Total protein was extracted and BCA protein detection kit (Beyotime, Jiangsu, China) was used to evaluate the protein concentration. after electrophoresis, transfer membrane, antibody incubation process, the dilute concentration of primary antibody is PD-L1(1:500), Sema4D(1:1000), Plexin-B1(1:1000), PI3K(1:100), p-PI3K(1:1000), AKT(1:1000), p-AKT(1:500), an ECL chromogenic substrate was applied for detecting the signals (Beyotime, Jiangsu, China).
RT-qPCR
Total RNA was obtained by processing the samples with TRIzol reagent and Rnase-free DNase Set (Beyotime, Jiangsu, China). The synthesis of complementary DNA was performed using a cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Finally, RT-qPCR analysis was performed using an ABI PRISM 7900-HT sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). For RT-qPCR, the following primers were used.
PD-L1:5′-AGAACCTGGCTGCACCTAAC-3′(F),
5′-GAGAAGGTCAAACCGCCTCA-3′(R);
Plexin-B1:5′-AAGCCCAGCCTACTAACAACC-3′(F),
5′-CAGCCCCACTGTACTGACTG-3′(R);
Sema4D:5′-TCAAAGCAGACGGAATGCCTA-3′(F),
5′-CCCCAACCATGACTGATGTGTA-3′(R);
GAPDH:5′-TTGTCATGGGAGTGAACGAGA-3′(F),
5′-CAGGCAGTTGGTGGTACAGG-3′(R).
shRNA and expression plasmid transfection
Short hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeting Sema4D and the lentivirus containing this shRNA were designed and synthesized by Genepharm Co. (Shanghai, China), sh-sema4D (5′-GGATGGGACTG TCTATGATGT-3′) and the control NC-sema4D (5′-TTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGT-3′). The shuttle plasmid and three other packaging plasmids (pGag/Pol, pRev, pVSV- G) were co-transfected into 293T cells to generate a lentivirus expressing Sema4D shRNA or a control lentivirus expressing shRNA. Cells were inoculated into 6-well plates at 1 × 105 and infected with lentivirus while 5 µg/mL of Polybrene was added. The culture media was changed after 24 h of infection, and the infected cells were screened with 1 µg/mL of puromycin for 7 days after the culture media change to obtain stable lentiviral shRNA expressing cell lines for subsequent experimental analysis (Moore et al., 2010).
Sema4D overexpression
B16-F10 cells were treated with RPMI 1640 containing 10% fetal bovine serum culture medium was placed in 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C, and logarithmic growth was taken long-term cells were used in the experiment. Construct Sema4D lentivirus overexpression vector LV-Sema4D and negative control LV-NC, these vectors were commissioned by Gemma Pharmaceutical Technology Co., LTD. (Shanghai, China) to synthesize. B16-F10 cell was inoculated in 24-well plates and cultured for 24 h multiplicity of infection, complete culture medium was replaced for further culture 48 h, the expression of Sema4D was detected by RT-qPCR.
MTT
Cell viability was measured by Methyl Thiazolyl Tetrazolium (MTT) assay. MTT was dissolved in DMSO and 0.5 mg/mL MTT diluted in 1 × PBS for 4 h, Turn on Benchmark Plus microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and detect absorbance at 570 nm (Algazi et al., 2020).
Cell apoptosis analysis
Cell apoptosis were detected by AnnexinV-AlexaFluor647/PI Kit Apoptosis Assay Kit (Biotech, Minneapolis, MN, USA). 5 × 105 B16-F10R cells were seeded in 10-cm culture dishes (Corning, Corning, NY, USA) and incubated overnight. 5 × 105 treated cells were collected and resuspended with 500 µL binding buffer. 5 µL Annexin V/AlexaFluor647 were incubate for 5 min at room temperature, then add 10 µL propidium iodide (PI), fluorescent dyes should be protected from light. All operations are performed as per manufacturer instructions.
Wound healing and invasion analysis
B16-F10R cells invasion and migration was analyzed by Matrigel-coated invasion chambers and scratch assays respectively. The initial number of cells cultured was 5 × 105, a sterile 10 µL pipette tip was used to mark a line in the monolayer of each well, the wounds were observed at 0, 24 and 48 h under a microscope (Nikon, Japan). ImageJ software was used to measure the wound areas. Cell free migration area =(cell free area 0 h - cell free area 24h)/cell free area 0 h (Ji et al., 2018). 5 × 105 cells were placed into the Matrigel-coated invasion chambers (Corning, USA) to incubation, the upper and lower cultures were separated by polycarbonate membranes, and the cells under study were planted in the chamber, after 48 h, the top of Matrigel and invading cells were fixed and stained with 0.1% crystal violet. The microscope (Nikon, Japan) was used to photograph invading cells, and 3 fields were randomly selected and counted each time.
Animal and tumorigenesis
Balb/c mice with 12-week-old were purchased from Chendu dossy experimental animals CO., LTD (SCXK (Chuan) 2020-030, Chengdu, China). The mice were fed unrestricted diet and water intake, and were kept under specific pathogen-free conditions in a laboratory where a 12-hour light/dark cycle was strictly enforced (SYXK(Chuan) 2018-065, Luzhou, China). For each group, at least 5 mice were used (Sanmamed et al., 2015). Tumor volumes were measured on 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 days with caliper, at days 18, mice were sacrificed, tumor weight was measured, tumor volumes were calculated with the formula: tumor volume = 0.52 × length × width2 (mm3) .
Data collection
Melanoma gene expression profiling data were extracted from the Cancer Genome Consortium (TCGA) database using the TCGAbiolinks software package. Expression profiles were converted to transcripts per million mapped reads per kilobase exon model (TPM) and normalized by log2.
Weighted co-expression network analysis
To explore the signaling pathways involved in Sema4D, gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was first conducted to determine genes with significant change between high- and low-expression of Sema4D through the WGCNA package on R project. Topological overlapping measurement was utilized to identify modules most associated with Sema4D expressions. Correlation between modules and traits is calculated by Spearman correlation analysis.
Protein-protein interaction
To explore the potential functions played by Sema4D in various biological processes, we constructed Sema4D-related protein-protein interaction network by STRING (https://cn.string-db.org/).
Gene set variation analysis
Gene set variation analysis was conducted to reveal the molecular mechanisms under the different Sema4D expression populations in melanoma. The h.all.v7.5.1.symbols.gmt gene set was used to enrichment analysis and was downloaded from MSigDB (https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/index.jsp).
Functional enrichment analysis of Sema4D
To explore the mechanism of action of Sema4D involved in PD-1 inhibitor resistance, enrichment analysis on hub genes was performed. “ClusterProfiler” package in R project was utilized to identify the signaling pathways involved in Sema4D within TCGA cohort (which contains 471 melanoma samples).
Statistical analysis
GraphPad Prism V.7.00 software was utilized for statistical analysis. Different statistical methods were selected according to different experimental purposes, compare the differences between two groups, we chose Student’s t test, one-way ANOVA was used to compare the differences between the overall differences. P < 0.05 is considered to be statistically significant.
Results
Sema4D, Plexin-B1 and PD-L1 upregulation in nivolumab resistance B16-F10 cells
To investigate the mRNA and protein expression of Sema4D, Plexin-B1and PD-L1 in sensitive cell line and insensitive cell line of melanoma, mRNA and protein expression of Sema4D, Plexin-B1 and PD-L1 of B16-10 and B16-F10R were detected. Compared with B16-10 group, mRNA and protein expression of Sema4D, Plexin-B1and PD-L1 were significantly upregulation in B16-F10R group (Figs. 1A–1G).
Sema4D downregulation inhibit PD-L1 expression upon anti-PD-1 therapy
We analyzed the correlation of PD-L1 and Sema4D with bioinformatics, it showed that PD-L1 and Sema4D are positively correlated (Fig. 2A) in TCGA-cohort. Compared with Sema4D-NC group, protein expression of Sema4D in Sema4D-shRNA group was significantly downregulated, it indicated that Sema4D silencing is success (Figs. 2B and 2C). Compared with Sema4D-NC group, mRNA and protein expression of PD-L1 in Sema4D-shRNA group was significantly downregulated after nivolumab treatment, which was consistent with the results of bioinformatics (Figs. 2B, 2D and 2E). Therefore, Sema4D silencing significantly repressed the mRNA and protein expression of PD-L1.
Sema4D repression renders B16-F10R cells sensitive to PD-1 treatment
To explore the relationship between Sema4D downregulation and nivolumab treatment efficacy in B16-F10 and B16-F10R cells, we investigated the cell viability and cell apoptosis. First, we observe the effects of nivolumab on the cell viability of B16-F10 and B16-F10 resistant cell lines. Compared with the B16-F10 cell lines, nivolumab had inhibitory effect on B16-F10 cell lines (p = 0.0018), it is suggested that nivolumab has inhibitory effect on sensitive cell lines. Compared with the B16-F10+nivolumab group, the inhibitory effect of nivolumab on drug-resistant cell lines was decreased significantly (p = 0.0025), it is suggested that nivolumab has weak inhibitory effect on resistance cell lines (Fig. 3A). Next, we explored the effects of nivolumab on the cell viability of Sema4D overexpressed in B16-F10 cells. First, the mRNA expression of Sema4D was detected, and the results showed that Sema4D expression of LV-Sema4D group was increased significantly compared with the LV-NC group(p = 0.0083), it indicates that Sema4D transfection is successful (Fig. 3B). Through MTT, compared with LV-NC group, nivolumab have little inhibitory effect on B16-F10 cells with Sema4D overexpression (p < 0.0001), this suggest that Sema4D overexpression could weaken nivolumab effect, so Sema4D was related to nivolumab sensitivity to B16–F10 cells. (Fig. 3C). We further explored the effect of nivolumab on the cell viability of Sema4D knockdown B16-F10R cell lines, the results showed Sema4D downregulation potentiates anti-PD-1 treatment efficacy in B16-F10R cells. Compared with Sema4D-NC group, the cell viability of Sema4D-shRNA group in combination with nivolumab was decreased significantly (p = 0.0186) (Fig. 3D) and rate of apoptosis cell in Sema4D-shRNA group after treatment with anti-PD-1 was notably increased (p = 0.0027) (Fig. 3E). Finally, we tested the effect of nivolumab on Sema4D-knockdown melanoma in mice. In vivo experiment, we transplanted B16-F10R cells in the mice and observed the size and weight of tumors treated with nivolumab, tumor volume and weight were significantly delayed in Sema4D-shRNA group mice as compared to Sema4D-NC group mice (Figs. 3F, 3G and 3H).
Sema4D repression potentiates the effect of anti-PD-1 on cell invasion and migration
The effect of Sema4D repression with anti-PD-1 treatment on B16-F10R cell invasion and migration was analyzed by Matrigel-coated invasion chambers and scratch assay. The results showed that when knockdown of Sema4D, cell migration of Sema4D-shRNA group was decreased (p < 0.0001), the cell-free area between migrating cells from Sema4D-shRNA group was wider than the gap between cells of the Sema4D-NC group (Figs. 4A and 4B). In addition, the number of invaded cells was significantly less in Sema4D-shRNA group in contrast to Sema4D-NC group (Figs. 4C and 4D), these data suggesting that lowering Sema4D could enhance the inhibitory effect of anti-PD-1 on cell migration and invasion.
Downregulation of Sema4D inhibit PI3K/AKT expression
The brown module was determined to be most significantly associated with Sema4D expression (r = + − 0.67, p-value = 1e−62), which contained a total of 778 genes (Figs. 5A–5B). Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) revealed several significantly upregulated malignancy-associated events (IL-6, JAK, STAT3, MTORC1, and KRAS signaling pathways) in the Sema4D high expression group as well as downregulation of p53 signaling (Fig. 5C). Sema4D was significantly associated with oncogenes RHOA, RRAS and immunomodulatory-related genes PTPRC and PLXNC1 (Fig. 5D). Pathway enrichment analysis revealed that Sema4D is involved in multiple immune-related pathways as well as the PI3K/AKT pathway (Fig. 5E). Numerous studies have demonstrated that excessive activation of PI3K/AKT signaling pathway is associated with excessive proliferation of tumor cells, inhibition of apoptosis and attenuation of the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (Zhang, Richmond & Yan, 2022). The expression of PI3K/AKT protein was explored by Western blot. p-PI3K/PI3K, p-AKT/AKT of Sema4D-shRNA group were decreased than those of Sema4D-NC group, which suggesting aberrant activation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in the Sema4D-NC group (Fig. 5F).
Discussion
Immunotherapy is one important method for melanoma treatment, when alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 may improve survival rates (Simeone, Grimaldi & Ascierto, 2015). Nivolumab is a PD-1 inhibitor with high affinity to PD-1 (Hirano et al., 2005). However, the ineffectiveness or resistance of anti-PD-1 to melanoma is a serious problem. In general, anti-PD-1 resistance are mainly derived into acquired resistance and innate resistance (Bridgeman et al., 2014; Marincola et al., 2000; Bronte et al., 2005; O’Donnell et al., 2017). The causes of anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 resistance to melanoma are very complex and not fully understood. This study intends to elucidate that Sema4D may be involved in the sensitivity of melanoma to nivolumab therapy via PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.
Nivolumab is a PD-1 inhibitor, PD-1 exists in T cells while PD-L1 exists in tumor cells, so the effect of nivolumab on tumor cells requires the presence of T cells. B16-F10 is a melanoma cell line derived from C57BL/6J mice, but tumor formation can also be inoculated subcutaneously in Balb/c mice (Colombo et al., 2019). In this experiment, Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocyte (TIL) was obtained from Balb/c mice and added to B16-F10 or B16-F10R cell to simulate tumor microenvironment. B16-F10 resistance cells were implanted subcutaneously in Balb/c mice by subcutaneous injection to observe tumor volume and weight.
Sema4D expressed on many cancer cells, Plexin-B1 also expression in cancer such as ovarian, melanoma, when Sema4D combined with Plexin-B1, it correlates with tumor immune infiltration, angiogenesis, and tumor progression in melanoma (Ch’ng & Kumanogoh, 2010; Lu et al., 2021). To understand the expression of Sema4D in melanoma resistance to anti-PD-1, B16-F10 resistant cell lines was established, after administered 50 ng/ml nivolumab, the killing ability of nivolumab was significantly weaker than that of B16-F10 cell lines, this means that resistant cell lines are established successfully. Then we explored mRNA and protein expression of Sema4D and Plexin-B1 in B16-F10 cell lines and B16-F10R cell lines, our results revealed that the mRNA and protein expression of Sema4D and Plexin-B1 in drug-resistant cell lines were overexpressed. Therefore, we provide the evidence for the first time that Sema4D and Plexin-B1 is related to anti-PD-1 resistance of melanoma.
To further analyzed the relationship between Sema4D and nivolumab, Sema4D were overexpression in B16-F10 cells and Sema4D expression was silencing by shRNA in B16-F10R cells. It was observed that overexpression of Sema4D can attenuates the therapeutic effect of nivolumab in B16-F10 cells and downregulation of Sema4D will increase the sensitivity of B16-F10R cell lines to nivolumab. In addition, we also investigated the effects of Sema4D knockdown on B16-F10R cells in response to nivolumab, downregulation of Sema4D also increased the inhibiting the growth of tumor cells and reducing cell invasion and migration. As reported by Rezaeepoor that silencing of Sema4D serve as a therapeutics target for the suppression of invasion, migration (Rezaeepoor et al., 2021). A study conducted by Rashidi illustrated silencing of Sema4D can elevated apoptosis rate of SW48 cells in response to 5-FU treatment (Rashidi et al., 2020). Moreover, we verified the enhancement of anti-PD-1 sensitivity by Sema4D knockdown in vivo xenograft models, mice treated with nivolumab after Sema4D knockdown showed significantly slower tumor growth. Taken together, these finding demonstrated that Sema4D deficiency can potentiates nivolumab treatment efficacy.
We further analyzed the correlation between Sema4D and PD-L1 expression in anti-PD-1 resistance. It has been demonstrated that the presence of PD-L1 determines the response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy (Sunshine et al., 2017), regorafenib can promotes antitumor immunity via inhibiting PD-L1 expression in melanoma (Wu et al., 2019). JAK1/2 mutation leads to the lack of reactive PD-L1 expression, which is involved in the resistance of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (Shin et al., 2017). In this study, we evaluated PD-L1 expression in B16-F10, B16-F10R cell and B16-F10R cell knockdown with Sema4D-shRNA, the results showed PD-L1 expression in B16-F10R was increased and Sema4D knockdown group is decrease, these suggest that the effects of Sema4D knockdown on Nivolumab in B16-F10R cell lines may be related to the decrease of PD-L1 expression. However, which way contributes to the PD-L1 downregulation after knockdown Sema4D remains unclear and needs further investigation.
PI3K is phosphorylated by binding to GRB2, and AKT phosphorylates target genes to regulate cell function (Pu et al., 2021). Sema4D and plexin-B1 is associated with osteosarcoma, in which PYK2-PI3K-Akt pathway is activated to promote tumor progression (Li et al., 2021). To explore the relationship between Sema4D and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways in anti-PD-1 resistance, we detected the expression of PI3K/AKT protein, in B16-F10R cell, p-PI3K/PI3K, p-AKT/AKT expression were significantly increased, when inhibited the Sema4D, p-PI3K/PI3K, p-AKT/AKT expression of Sema4D-shRNA group were decreased, these shown that Sema4D can regulate PI3K/AKT expression and activity. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that Sema4D is involved in the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway which is activated and plays important roles such as being involved in the development and occurrence in melanoma and it also activate receptor tyrosine kinases (Davies, 2012). However, whether the relationship between Sema4D and nivolumab sensitivity is related to JAK-STAT signal pathway and other signal pathways needs further study.
In conclusion, we explored the role of Sema4D in the process of PD-1 inhibitor resistance. In anti-PD-1 resistant cell line, upregulation of Sema4D, Plexin-B1 and PD-L1 was observed. When Sema4D was silencing, it prevented the phosphorylation of PI3K and AKT, thus inhibiting the PI3K/AKT pathway activity. Therefore, these results may have therapeutic implication and may be exploited for the development of novel treatment for anti-PD-1 resistance melanoma in the future.
Supplemental Information
Funding Statement
This study was supported by grants from the Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Department Project (2022NSFSC0816, 2022YFS0619-C1), and the Project of Luzhou Science and Technology Bureau (2021JYJ-82). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Contributor Information
Zhangang Xiao, Email: zhangangxiao@swmu.edu.cn.
Suwit Duangmano, Email: suwit.du@cmu.ac.th.
Additional Information and Declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare there are no competing interests.
Author Contributions
Zhuo Zhang conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.
Duoli Zhang conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.
Fang Wang conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.
Jiao Liu conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Yuhong Sun analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.
Songyot Anuchapreeda conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Singkome Tima analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Zhangang Xiao analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Suwit Duangmano analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Data Availability
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The bioinformatics analysis code used in this study is available in the Supplemental File.
References
- Algazi et al. (2020).Algazi AP, Twitty CG, Tsai KK, Le M, Pierce R, Browning E, Hermiz R, Canton DA, Bannavong D, Oglesby A, Francisco M, Fong L, Pittet MJ, Arlauckas SP, Garris C, Levine LP, Bifulco C, Ballesteros-Merino C, Bhatia S, Gargosky S, Andtbacka RHI, Fox BA, Rosenblum MD, Daud AI. Phase II trial of IL-12 plasmid transfection and PD-1 blockade in immunologically quiescent melanoma. Clinical Cancer Research. 2020;26:2827–2837. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-2217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arneth (2019).Arneth B. Tumor Microenvironment. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) 2019;56(1):15. doi: 10.3390/medicina56010015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bridgeman et al. (2014).Bridgeman JS, Ladell K, Sheard VE, Miners K, Hawkins RE, Price DA, Gilham DE. CD3zeta-based chimeric antigen receptors mediate T cell activation via cis- and trans-signalling mechanisms: implications for optimization of receptor structure for adoptive cell therapy. Clinical and Experimental Immunology. 2014;175:258–267. doi: 10.1111/cei.12216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bronte et al. (2005).Bronte V, Kasic T, Gri G, Gallana K, Borsellino G, Marigo I, Battistini L, Iafrate M, Prayer-Galetti T, Pagano F, Viola A. Boosting antitumor responses of T lymphocytes infiltrating human prostate cancers. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2005;201:1257–1268. doi: 10.1084/jem.20042028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ch’ng & Kumanogoh (2010).Ch’ng ES, Kumanogoh A. Roles of Sema4D and Plexin-B1 in tumor progression. Molecular Cancer. 2010;9:251. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-9-251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colombo et al. (2019).Colombo LL, Vanzulli SI, Blázquez-Castro A, Terrero CS, Stockert JC. Photothermal effect by 808-nm laser irradiation of melanin: a proof-of-concept study of photothermal therapy using B16-F10 melanotic melanoma growing in BALB/c mice. Biomedical Optics Express. 2019;10(6):2932–2941. doi: 10.1364/BOE.10.002932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davies (2012).Davies MA. The role of the PI3K-AKT pathway in melanoma. The Cancer Journal. 2012;18:142–147. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e31824d448c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eggermont, Spatz & Robert (2014).Eggermont AM, Spatz A, Robert C. Cutaneous melanoma. The Lancet. 2014;383:816–827. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60802-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hirano et al. (2005).Hirano F, Kaneko K, Tamura H, Dong H, Wang S, Ichikawa M, Rietz C, Flies DB, Lau JS, Zhu G, Tamada K, Chen L. Blockade of B7-H1 and PD-1 by monoclonal antibodies potentiates cancer therapeutic immunity. Cancer Research. 2005;65:1089–1096. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.1089.65.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang & Zappasodi (2022).Huang AC, Zappasodi R. A decade of checkpoint blockade immunotherapy in melanoma: understanding the molecular basis for immune sensitivity and resistance. Nature Immunology. 2022;23:660–670. doi: 10.1038/s41590-022-01141-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hugo et al. (2016).Hugo W, Zaretsky JM, Sun L, Song C, Moreno BH, Hu-Lieskovan S, Berent-Maoz B, Pang J, Chmielowski B, Cherry G, Seja E, Lomeli S, Kong X, Kelley MC, Sosman JA, Johnson DB, Ribas A, Lo RS. Genomic and transcriptomic features of response to Anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma. Cell. 2016;165:35–44. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ji et al. (2018).Ji Y, Xiao Y, Xu L, He J, Qian C, Li W, Wu L, Chen R, Wang J, Hu R, Zhang X, Gu Z, Chen Z. Drug-bearing supramolecular MMP inhibitor nanofibers for inhibition of metastasis and growth of liver cancer. Advanced Science. 2018;5:1700867. doi: 10.1002/advs.201700867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Larkin et al. (2015).Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Grob JJ, Cowey CL, Lao CD, Schadendorf D, Dummer R, Smylie M, Rutkowski P, Ferrucci PF, Hill A, Wagstaff J, Carlino MS, Haanen JB, Maio M, Marquez-Rodas I, McArthur GA, Ascierto PA, Long GV, Callahan MK, Postow MA, Grossmann K, Sznol M, Dreno B, Bastholt L, Yang A, Rollin LM, Horak C, Hodi FS, Wolchok JD. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2015;373:23–34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li et al. (2021).Li C, Wan L, Wang P, Guan X, Li C, Wang X. Sema4D/Plexin-B1 promotes the progression of osteosarcoma cells by activating Pyk2-PI3K-AKT pathway. Journal of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions. 2021;21:577–583. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu et al. (2015).Liu XL, Song J, Liu KJ, Wang WP, Xu C, Zhang YZ, Liu Y. Role of inhibition of osteogenesis function by Sema4D/Plexin-B1 signaling pathway in skeletal fluorosis in vitro. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology—Medical Science. 2015;35:712–715. doi: 10.1007/s11596-015-1495-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lontos et al. (2018).Lontos K, Adamik J, Tsagianni A, Galson DL, Chirgwin JM, Suvannasankha A. The role of semaphorin 4D in bone remodeling and cancer metastasis. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2018;9:322. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu et al. (2021).Lu Q, Cai P, Yu Y, Liu Z, Chen G, Zeng Z. Sema4D correlates with tumour immune infiltration and is a prognostic biomarker in bladder cancer, renal clear cell carcinoma, melanoma and thymoma. Autoimmunity. 2021;54:294–302. doi: 10.1080/08916934.2021.1925885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maeda, Lafreniere & Jerry (1991).Maeda K, Lafreniere R, Jerry LM. Production and characterization of tumor infiltrating lymphocyte clones derived from B16-F10 murine melanoma. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 1991;97:183–189. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12479562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marincola et al. (2000).Marincola FM, Jaffee EM, Hicklin DJ, Ferrone S. Escape of human solid tumors from T-cell recognition: molecular mechanisms and functional significance. Advances in Immunology. 2000;74:181–273. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60911-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Melixetian, Pelicci & Lanfrancone (2022).Melixetian M, Pelicci PG, Lanfrancone L. Regulation of LncRNAs in melanoma and their functional roles in the metastatic process. Cells. 2022;11(3):577. doi: 10.3390/cells11030577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller & Mihm Jr (2006).Miller AJ, Mihm Jr MC. Melanoma. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2006;355:51–65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra052166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moore et al. (2010).Moore CB, Guthrie EH, Huang MT, Taxman DJ. Short hairpin RNA (shRNA): design, delivery, and assessment of gene knockdown. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2010;629:141–158. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-657-3_10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O’Donnell et al. (2017).O’Donnell JS, Long GV, Scolyer RA, Teng MW, Smyth MJ. Resistance to PD1/PDL1 checkpoint inhibition. Cancer Treatment Reviews. 2017;52:71–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pu et al. (2021).Pu Y, Lei M, Chen Y, Huang Y, Zhang L, Chen J, Zhang Y, Shao X, Liu L, Chen J. Hey1 promotes migration and invasion of melanoma cells via GRB2/PI3K/AKT signaling cascade. Journal of Cancer. 2021;12:6979–6988. doi: 10.7150/jca.60974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rashidi et al. (2020).Rashidi G, Rezaeepoor M, Mohammadi C, Solgi G, Najafi R. Inhibition of semaphorin 4D enhances chemosensitivity by increasing 5-fluorouracile-induced apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells. Molecular Biology Reports. 2020;47:7017–7027. doi: 10.1007/s11033-020-05761-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rezaeepoor et al. (2021).Rezaeepoor M, Rashidi G, Pourjafar M, Mohammadi C, Solgi G, Najafi R. SEMA4D knockdown attenuates beta-catenin-dependent tumor progression in colorectal cancer. BioMed Research International. 2021;2021:8507373. doi: 10.1155/2021/8507373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ribas et al. (2015).Ribas A, Puzanov I, Dummer R, Schadendorf D, Hamid O, Robert C, Hodi FS, Schachter J, Pavlick AC, Lewis KD, Cranmer LD, Blank CU, O’Day SJ, Ascierto PA, Salama AK, Margolin KA, Loquai C, Eigentler TK, Gangadhar TC, Carlino MS, Agarwala SS, Moschos SJ, Sosman JA, Goldinger SM, Shapira-Frommer R, Gonzalez R, Kirkwood JM, Wolchok JD, Eggermont A, Li XN, Zhou W, Zernhelt AM, Lis J, Ebbinghaus S, Kang SP, Daud A. Pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for ipilimumab-refractory melanoma (KEYNOTE-002): a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2015;16:908–918. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00083-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robert et al. (2015a).Robert C, Long GV, Brady B, Dutriaux C, Maio M, Mortier L, Hassel JC, Rutkowski P, McNeil C, Kalinka-Warzocha E, Savage KJ, Hernberg MM, Lebbe C, Charles J, Mihalcioiu C, Chiarion-Sileni V, Mauch C, Cognetti F, Arance A, Schmidt H, Schadendorf D, Gogas H, Lundgren-Eriksson L, Horak C, Sharkey B, Waxman IM, Atkinson V, Ascierto PA. Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2015a;372:320–330. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1412082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robert et al. (2015b).Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, Arance A, Grob JJ, Mortier L, Daud A, Carlino MS, McNeil C, Lotem M, Larkin J, Lorigan P, Neyns B, Blank CU, Hamid O, Mateus C, Shapira-Frommer R, Kosh M, Zhou H, Ibrahim N, Ebbinghaus S, Ribas A. investigators K- Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2015b;372:2521–2532. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodriguez-Cerdeira et al. (2017).Rodriguez-Cerdeira C, Gregorio MCarnero, Lopez-Barcenas A, Sanchez-Blanco E, Sanchez-Blanco B, Fabbrocini G, Bardhi B, Sinani A, Guzman RA. Advances in immunotherapy for melanoma: a comprehensive review. Mediators of Inflammation. 2017;2017:3264217. doi: 10.1155/2017/3264217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sanmamed et al. (2015).Sanmamed MF, Rodriguez I, Schalper KA, Onate C, Azpilikueta A, Rodriguez-Ruiz ME, Morales-Kastresana A, Labiano S, Perez-Gracia JL, Martin-Algarra S, Alfaro C, Mazzolini G, Sarno F, Hidalgo M, Korman AJ, Jure-Kunkel M, Melero I. Nivolumab and urelumab enhance antitumor activity of human T lymphocytes engrafted in Rag2-/-IL2Rgammanull immunodeficient mice. Cancer Research. 2015;75:3466–3478. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shayan et al. (2017).Shayan G, Srivastava R, Li J, Schmitt N, Kane LP, Ferris RL. Adaptive resistance to anti-PD1 therapy by Tim-3 upregulation is mediated by the PI3K-Akt pathway in head and neck cancer. Oncoimmunology. 2017;6:e1261779. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1261779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shin et al. (2017).Shin DS, Zaretsky JM, Escuin-Ordinas H, Garcia-Diaz A, Hu-Lieskovan S, Kalbasi A, Grasso CS, Hugo W, Sandoval S, Torrejon DY, Palaskas N, Rodriguez GA, Parisi G, Azhdam A, Chmielowski B, Cherry G, Seja E, Berent-Maoz B, Shintaku IP, Le DT, Pardoll DM, Diaz Jr LA, Tumeh PC, Graeber TG, Lo RS, Comin-Anduix B, Ribas A. Primary resistance to PD-1 blockade mediated by JAK1/2 mutations. Cancer Discovery. 2017;7:188–201. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-1223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simeone, Grimaldi & Ascierto (2015).Simeone E, Grimaldi AM, Ascierto PA. Anti-PD1 and anti-PD-L1 in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Melanoma Manag. 2015;2:41–50. doi: 10.2217/mmt.14.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun, Mezzadra & Schumacher (2018).Sun C, Mezzadra R, Schumacher TN. Regulation and function of the PD-L1 checkpoint. Immunity. 2018;48:434–452. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.03.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sunshine et al. (2017).Sunshine JC, Nguyen PL, Kaunitz GJ, Cottrell TR, Berry S, Esandrio J, Xu H, Ogurtsova A, Bleich KB, Cornish TC, Lipson EJ, Anders RA, Taube JM. PD-L1 expression in melanoma: a quantitative immunohistochemical antibody comparison. Clinical Cancer Research. 2017;23:4938–4944. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-1821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Valentini et al. (2021).Valentini E, Martile MDi, Bufalo DDel, D’Aguanno S. SEMAPHORINS and their receptors: focus on the crosstalk between melanoma and hypoxia. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research. 2021;40:131. doi: 10.1186/s13046-021-01929-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van den Berg et al. (2020).Van den Berg JH, Heemskerk B, Van Rooij N, Gomez-Eerland R, Michels S, Van Zon M, De Boer R, Bakker NAM, Jorritsma-Smit A, Van Buuren MM, Kvistborg P, Spits H, Schotte R, Mallo H, Karger M, Van der Hage JA, Wouters M, Pronk LM, Geukes Foppen MH, Blank CU, Beijnen JH, Nuijen B, Schumacher TN, Haanen J. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) therapy in metastatic melanoma: boosting of neoantigen-specific T cell reactivity and long-term follow-up. The Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer. 2020;8(2):e000848. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weber et al. (2015).Weber JS, D’Angelo SP, Minor D, Hodi FS, Gutzmer R, Neyns B, Hoeller C, Khushalani NI, Miller Jr WH, Lao CD, Linette GP, Thomas L, Lorigan P, Grossmann KF, Hassel JC, Maio M, Sznol M, Ascierto PA, Mohr P, Chmielowski B, Bryce A, Svane IM, Grob JJ, Krackhardt AM, Horak C, Lambert A, Yang AS, Larkin J. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2015;16:375–384. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70076-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu et al. (2019).Wu RY, Kong PF, Xia LP, Huang Y, Li ZL, Tang YY, Chen YH, Li X, Senthilkumar R, Zhang HL, Sun T, Xu XL, Yu Y, Mai J, Peng XD, Yang D, Zhou LH, Feng GK, Deng R, Zhu XF. Regorafenib promotes antitumor immunity via inhibiting PD-L1 and IDO1 expression in melanoma. Clinical Cancer Research. 2019;25:4530–4541. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu et al. (2006).Yu M, Lowell CA, Neel BG, Gu H. Scaffolding adapter Grb2-associated binder 2 requires Syk to transmit signals from FcepsilonRI. Journal of Immunology. 2006;176:2421–2429. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.4.2421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Richmond & Yan (2022).Zhang Z, Richmond A, Yan C. Immunomodulatory properties of PI3K/AKT/mTOR and MAPK/MEK/ERK inhibition augment response to immune checkpoint blockade in melanoma and triple-negative breast cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022;23(13):7353. doi: 10.3390/ijms23137353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The bioinformatics analysis code used in this study is available in the Supplemental File.