Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Apr 24;18(4):e0284906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284906

Perspectives about social support among unmarried pregnant university students in South Africa

Thandiwe Msipu Phiri 1, Patrick Nyamaruze 1, Olagoke Akintola 1,*
Editor: Tara Tancred2
PMCID: PMC10124874  PMID: 37093843

Abstract

Background

Pregnant young women in an academic environment are susceptible to stressors associated with unintended pregnancy and academic demands of universities. The challenges they face may be exacerbated by lack of social support, putting them at risk of psychological disorders such as depression. Women who receive social support during pregnancy and postpartum experience less emotional distress and report greater maternal satisfaction. However, very little is known about the perspectives about social support among unmarried pregnant students in tertiary institutions.

Methods

Participants were purposively selected among unmarried pregnant students and those in the puerperal period at the time of the study. We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews to explore the perspectives of unmarried pregnant students on the type of support that they need during pregnancy and the puerperium and the period when most support is needed. The data were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim, then analysed using thematic analysis.

Results

The findings show that social supports (emotional, instrumental, informational, and financial) were highlighted as important resources to cope with stressors during pregnancy and post-birth. Emotional support from male partners was the most important type of support needed as it entailed a sense of being loved and cared for. Social support was identified as important throughout the different phases of pregnancy and post birth, with different support needs expressed at each of these phases.

Conclusion

This study identified support needs of unmarried pregnant university students in their transition to motherhood. Given the several challenges that they are faced with, unmarried pregnant students need social support, including male partner support to enhance wellbeing as they try to cope with academic and pregnancy-related stressors.

Background

Pregnancy marks the beginning of the transition to motherhood, and it is a period of great physical and psychological changes for all women [1]. For a lot of women, it is a period of time that is spent in material and psychological preparation for the arrival of a baby, whose presence brings about several changes in the mother’s life. But for some women, this can be a period characterised by considerable physical and emotional stress. The stressors range from physical exhaustion, overwhelming tasks, decreased financial resources, social isolation and depressive symptoms [1, 2]. Research shows that young women experience several unique stressors during pregnancy due to their age and social context. Stressors such as academic demands, lack of income and relationship problems with their partners could affect their psychological wellbeing [3, 4]. Pregnant mothers therefore need support that involves undertaking tangible acts, showing concern, encouragement and care which increases potential for the expectant mother to embrace pregnancy-related changes and promote positive wellbeing for both mother and child [5, 6].

Although social support is of great value for all mothers during pregnancy, certain groups of women are especially vulnerable during pregnancy, and these include adolescents, unmarried women, students and women of low socio-economic status [7]. Because of the risky sexual behavior among students, young women in institutions of higher learning have a high risk of unintended pregnancy [8], particularly among unmarried students [8–10]. While some students may choose to terminate their unintended pregnancies as a legal right stipulated under the Choice in Termination of Pregnancy Act in South Africa [11], abortion is often publicly condemned and associated with negative and judgmental attitudes from health care providers and the community [12, 13]. Students that choose to keep their unintended pregnancies remain in need of a supportive environment that favours their physical and psychological wellbeing.

Young mothers have less support and face more challenges in terms of adjustment to motherhood as compared to older women [14]. For young mothers in an academic environment, the integration of their roles as students with their new role of motherhood can be confusing and stressful [15]. The challenges they face may be exacerbated by a lack of social support, putting them at risk of psychological disorders such as postpartum depression [16]. Furthermore, one study showed that married women received more support from their partners as compared to unmarried women [17]. This shows that marital status influences the amount of support that pregnant women receive from their partners. Women who receive support from their partners both during pregnancy and in the postpartum period have been shown to experience better mental health outcomes including less anxiety, emotional distress, depressive symptoms and report greater maternal satisfaction [18, 19].

University students are a population that is susceptible to stress given their academic demands [20]. Most university students are at an age and social context where they are transitioning from adolescence into young adulthood. This can be a difficult period particularly for first year students who struggle with fitting in, maintaining relationships and getting good grades amid the growing demands of life at the university [21].

Social support for unmarried pregnant women can come from different sources among them family, friends, male partners and their community. House [22] defines social support as perception and actuality that one is cared for, has assistance available from other people, and that one is part of a supportive social network. Social support, either received from people closest to a person or offered through organizational interventions, has a positive influence on pregnancy experiences [23].

Social support is a multi-dimensional construct and has been conceptually divided into four domains: informational; instrumental; appraisal; and emotional support [24]. Emotional support includes any actions of caring towards and improvement of esteem in the recipient of the support. Emotional support for pregnant women could decrease the likelihood of psychological stress disorders and depressive symptoms. Informational support is generally advice and guidance given and, in this case, it could positively influence decisions on issues such as prenatal care, recommended nutritional and healthcare practices and preparation for labour and delivery [24]. Instrumental support involves giving help with tasks or providing material or tangible goods to an individual [24]. Instrumental support such as assistance with household chores and childcare could help expectant mothers cope with physical exhaustion and physically taxing demands which could cause strain, particularly in the last trimester of the pregnancy [25]. Appraisal support is providing evaluative feedback to others and consistent positive feedback during pregnancy and after birth may help normalise the concerns of mothers and build their self-esteem and self-confidence in their parenting role [26]. Support networks have a buffering effect on the stressors associated with pregnancy and motherhood [27]. In the context of maternal and child health, supportive relationships may have a positive effect on pregnant women, giving them a sense of personal control and enhanced feelings of wellbeing that would help them perceive their pregnancy as less stressful [27, 28].

Unmarried pregnant students are a vulnerable group considering the circumstances that surround their pregnancy such as their age, unstable relationships with their baby’s fathers, unemployment/lack of income, academic commitments and social stigma. However, the support needs of unmarried pregnant students in university settings has received little attention. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore the perspectives about social support among unmarried pregnant students in a university setting. The findings could provide insight into factors that could assist in designing interventions for this population.

Objective

We sought to achieve two objectives in the study:

  1. To explore the social support needs of unmarried students in tertiary institutions during pregnancy and the puerperium.

  1. To explore the period when most support is needed by unmarried students in tertiary institutions during pregnancy and the puerperium.

Methods

Study design

The descriptive qualitative research design was seen as best suited to answer the research questions in this study. Descriptive qualitative research design enables researchers to get an insider’s view of participants and their experiences in a natural setting [29]. The rationale for the use of a descriptive qualitative research design is to provide straightforward descriptions of experiences and perceptions [30], particularly in areas where little is known about the phenomenon under investigation. The choice of a descriptive qualitative research design was primarily determined by the type of questions the study sought to address, that is, to gain a deep understanding of the type of social support needed by unmarried pregnant students. This design was appropriate as it fostered maximum co-operation and closeness between the interviewer and the participants and enabled them to describe their perspectives about pregnancy and support needs while studying in university.

Participants

Participants in the study were all female students at a public university in South Africa. Participants were recruited if they met a set of inclusion criteria which included that they: were currently registered as undergraduate or post-graduate students at the university; were currently pregnant or in the puerperal period (less than six weeks post childbirth) at the time of the study; self-identified as being unmarried; and were willing to answer questions regarding their perspectives about their pregnancy and support needs.

Because issues relating to pregnancy among young people are sensitive and therefore not openly discussed, it was not easy to recruit participants for the study. Therefore, we used the snowball sampling technique in this study. This is a type of purposive sampling that allowed participants to recommend others in their circle who met the inclusion criteria and were willing to participate in the study [31].

The first author (TMP) initially approached three unmarried pregnant students who stayed in the same residence as her. She (TMP) discussed about the study with those students and requested them to identify and recommend other students who were unmarried and pregnant or had recently given birth. Next, she (TMP) approached and invited those who met the criteria to participate in the study. The first author was a Masters student and a young woman who had a pregnancy and delivered a baby while studying for her Masters degree. She had received training on qualitative interviewing as part of her Masters degree and additional training from the third author (OA) who is a Public Health Promotion and Research Methods specialist. She conducted all the interviews drawing on her own pregnancy experiences. The rationale for that was that some of the participants might be ashamed to express themselves when being interviewed by the opposite sex or an individual who had not experienced pregnancy. It has been shown that the gender of the interviewer can substantially affect the response rate in data collection [32].

Thirty-three students were invited to participate in the study and seven of them were excluded because they were past the puerperal period. Two of those invited to participate mentioned that they were not comfortable to discuss their pregnancy experiences and the remaining 24 were recruited to participate in the study.

Data collection

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Humanities and Social Sciences Research Ethics Committee of the University where the study was conducted (HSS/0584/015M). In-depth interviews were conducted using an interview schedule which contained open-ended questions. The interview schedule was designed to suit the context of the study setting and to encourage unmarried pregnant students to discuss their experiences. The schedule was also reviewed and approved by the third author (OA) who was the research project supervisor. The questions contained in the interview schedule included the socio-demographic variables of participants and their partners, the support needs of unmarried pregnant students, the period when most support is needed and the role of their male partners. Some of the interview questions posed to participants include: “Describe some of the challenges you face in your pregnancy? As a pregnant student?”; “what stage of pregnancy do you feel you need the most support from significant others? Why and from whom?”; and “From the support needs you have already mentioned, which ones do you feel are the most important to you? Why?”.

The interviews were conducted in a private and quiet seminar room within the university. This gave the participants an atmosphere of safety and comfort in which they could talk about their personal experiences considering the sensitive nature of the topic. The interviewer (TMP) made field notes during the interview and then summarized these following the interview. The field notes were thereafter used to develop analytical memos. Each interview lasted approximately 40 minutes. The open-ended questions provided the participants with an opportunity to interact freely and to discuss their perspectives regarding support needs during pregnancy in detail. Written informed consent was sought and obtained from all the participants before the commencement of interviews. Permission to record the interviews was sought and obtained from participants prior to the interviews. We used a digital audio voice recorder and the recordings were safely stored in a password protected computer. Data collection was carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and the participants could withdraw from the study at any point. Although the study was of a sensitive nature, we did not anticipate any negative effects on the participants. However, we had arranged counselling services for the participants if the need arises but none of the participants requested for these services.Data analysis

The audio-recorded data was transcribed verbatim by the first author (TMP). The anonymity of the participants was maintained by assigning a pseudonym to each. We chose thematic analysis as the method of analysis for the data because it allowed us the opportunity to conduct iterations through careful reading and re-reading of the data in order to discover underlying meanings and patterns and to produce a detailed account of the phenomenon [33, 34]. As qualitative descriptive research is purely data-derived [35], we specifically employed an inductive approach to thematic analysis [36].

The first author (TMP) performed the initial round of coding following the six steps described by Braun and Clark [36]. The first step in the process was familiarization with the data by reading and re-reading the transcripts to make summaries. Secondly, she (TMP) generated initial codes and this step was followed by identifying the emerging themes, which is the third step. Although 16 interviews already indicated a point of saturation, we decided to continue analysis of the remaining interviews to ensure that no potential new codes were identified [26]. Fourthly, TMP reviewed potential themes, particularly checking for inconsistencies and whether the themes overlapped. Next, the themes were defined and named. Lastly, a report was produced using quotations of what the participants said to illustrate the themes [36].

It is important to note that this process was not straightforward as presented rather it was iterative. The initial coding was then reviewed and modified by the third author (OA) after which the second author (PN; a post-doctoral fellow and researcher), conducted a general review of the themes. All the authors revised, finalized and agreed upon the themes.

Findings

In total, twenty-four students who met our criteria participated in the study (Table 1). Among these, twenty-one were pregnant and three were in the puerperal period. All participants, including those who were in the puerperal period had disclosed their pregnancy to significant others.

Table 1. Socio-demographic details of participants (n = 24).

Participant pseudonyms Age Gestational stage Number of previous pregnancies
Mbali 20 Seven months pregnant None
Lindiwe 23 Eight months pregnant None
Busi 19 Four months pregnant None
Samantha 19 Seven months pregnant None
Nomthandazo 19 Four weeks puerperium None
Bongiwe 21 Three months pregnant None
Bella 26 Six months pregnant One
Kholeka 21 Eight months pregnant None
Zevile 23 Five months pregnant None
Rachael 22 Five months pregnant None
Thuli 21 Eight months pregnant None
Njabulo 24 Six months pregnant None
Khethiwe 24 Four months pregnant One
Slindile 20 Three weeks puerperium None
Amahle 21 Seven months pregnant None
Khanyisile 22 Nine months pregnant One
Thandeka 20 Four months pregnant None
Lerato 21 Five weeks puerperium None
Zinhle 23 Six months pregnant None
Tamara 20 Three months pregnant None
Naledi 26 Seven months pregnant One
Siyanda 19 Four months pregnant None
Nandi 23 Seven months pregnant None
Ntando 22 Three months pregnant None

A summary of the characteristics of the participants are provided in Table 2. Four of the participants had one previous pregnancy while it was the first pregnancy for the remaining twenty participants. The findings are organized into four main themes and ten sub-themes identified from the analysis of the data. The four main themes are: Support needs of unmarried pregnant students; period when the most support is needed; male partner support required; and health systems role on social support.

Table 2. Summary of the socio-demographic details of participants.

Characteristics Number of participants (Percentage)
Age of participants 15–19 4 (16.7%)
20–24 18 (75%)
25–30 2 (8.3)
Year of study 1st year; undergraduate 7 (29%)
2nd year; undergraduate 9 (37.5%)
3rd year; undergraduate 5 (21%)
Honours; post-graduate 3 (12.5%)
Gestational age 1st month-birth 21 (87.5%)
Birth-6 weeks puerperium 3 (12.5%)
Number of previous pregnancies None 20 (83%)
1 4 (17%)

Support needs of unmarried pregnant students

Support during pregnancy was perceived to be very important among all the participants. All the participants said they could not do without social support. The support needs of the participants were similar in many ways but sometimes unique to their situation. The following three sub-themes emerged from the interviews: emotional support, instrumental support, and informational support.

Emotional support

Some of the participants indicated that they felt a sense of shame because of their pregnancy. Other participants mentioned experiencing feelings of shame and embarrassment at university and in their communities as a result of their pregnancy. This was exacerbated when people would stare at them and that was considered to be a negative attitude.

Some of my friends ignore me due to the pregnancy because they don’t wanna walk with me to school and I also see myself as totally different from them. At first, I felt so neglected now I have accepted that am pregnant and things won’t be the same. I usually walk alone. Some friends will support me, some will not. [Lindiwe, eight months pregnant, undergraduate]

Emotional support was considered to be the most important type of support among participants. Some participants expressed their need for a ‘listening ear’ and the desire to be understood and not be judged for getting pregnant. Their accounts showed that they experienced feelings of sadness and loneliness and considered themselves vulnerable because they got pregnant whilst pursuing their studies. Personal vulnerabilities and situational constraints led to loneliness among the participants. Due to loneliness, the unmarried students in this study expressed a need for social relationships that would offer constant assurance that someone was there for them. Therefore, to minimize these feelings of loneliness, emotional support was considered to be the most important type of support that they needed to receive among all others.

It feels good to have people around and knowing that you are loved. Although you made mistakes—not that a baby is a mistake–but being pregnant while you are studying, being something that you have not planned obviously. So, knowing that although you have made that mistake, but people haven’t abandoned you. People around you like your loved ones and your family- that they still love you. [Slindile, three weeks pueperal, undergraduate]

In comparison to financial support, receiving emotional support and having people who were going to be there for them in times of sadness was said to be important and it made their pregnancy easier to handle.

I just don’t need money in that kind of way. The kind of support that I would really like, that I would really expect is for people to be there for me, to give me that much attention, to be there when I feel sad. [Rachael, five months pregnant, undergraduate]

For some participants, having someone available to offer emotional support was important regardless of who was offering it. They reported that the availability of emotional support made a huge difference in their lives regardless of its source because their greatest need was to feel loved and cared for. Having people to talk to and understand them, without judging them was important for participants.

A person who is pregnant just needs support, love—no matter how bad the situation is or how it has happened. Having people to talk to and that understand, are really there for you, lending their ear more than their mouth, people to talk to. [Samantha, seven months pregnant, undergraduate]

Instrumental support

Receiving help with tasks and help to manage their time was an important support need of some participants. Their narratives revealed that instrumental support was most needed at the end of the pregnancy because as the pregnancy progressed, it became more difficult to be mobile. Therefore, they needed people to be around and help them with chores, academic tasks, accompanying them to certain places especially hospitals or going to buy them food and groceries. One participant noted that she needed company every time she was going to the health facilities unlike before she got pregnant.

If I was sick and I wasn’t pregnant I’d be like, “no please, don’t come, I’ll go by myself”. Now! [that she is pregnant], Now I can’t go to the clinic by myself, I’ll just call anyone, call my sister or my aunt, she’s always there she’s like no I’ll take you. If it [support] had to stop now, I don’t know what I would do. [Amahle, seven months pregnant, undergraduate]

Another participant revealed how overwhelming the tasks had become in her last trimester of pregnancy and the importance of receiving instrumental support during this period.

When you are nearing your end [approaching delivery], you have so much to do. You have got school things to do, you have got doctors’ appointments consistently one after the other, you have to buy this, get this, get that, that’s when you need a more rigid [solid] support system. [Khanyisile, nine months pregnant, second pregnancy, undergraduate]

These excerpts show that apart from the need to feel better about their situation, unmarried pregnant students need help with tasks to relieve them of physical stress. In addition, receiving help with tasks also had an effect on their emotional wellbeing.

Informational support

The narratives of the participants in this study revealed that young women, particularly first-time mothers are usually inexperienced with pregnancy and childbirth and need advice and information. Some participants reported that they needed people around them that could help them with information about pregnancy, childbirth and how to care for their baby.

I do not have experience on how to bath the baby, feed the baby well when it’s crying, what’s wrong. They [people] should tell me what to expect if am not figuring out, they must assist me. [Busi, four months pregnant, undergraduate]

Other participants also indicated that they needed information on what to expect during the different stages of pregnancy and childbirth. One of the participants who had a previous pregnancy explained the difficulties of having a first pregnancy without adequate knowledge of the accompanying physical changes.

At the beginning of pregnancy, maybe you are not sure what is happening to you, may be for some people it’s the first time you don’t know what is happening, all the sickness. At the end that’s exactly what’s happening to you, breaking water and all that. Some of the things you wouldn’t know so someone should tell you. [Bella, six months pregnant, second pregnancy, post-graduate]

Participants require guidance on pregnancy with respect to proper nutritional practices, adequate prenatal care and preparation for labour and delivery. In a unique case, one of the participants was at risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes as she lacked adequate information on proper nutrition practices as illustrated below:

After I fell pregnant, I did not eat. I don’t usually eat. I didn’t know that when you fall pregnant you have to change your lifestyle and do things in a certain way. It was a shock when I went for a scan when I was five months pregnant and they said my baby looks like he’s two or three months, he was underdeveloped. So, the doctor said “it’s either your child is gonna be disabled or when you give birth, you’re gonna have to stay in hospital for a long time cause he’s really small”. [Samantha, seven months pregnant, undergraduate]

The participant’s narrative highlights the challenges of poor nutritional intake during pregnancy.

Period when the most support is required

When asked about the specific period during pregnancy when they feel the most support is required, participants had different views and four sub-themes arose.

At the beginning of pregnancy

Some of the participants said they needed the most support, particularly emotional support at the beginning of the pregnancy. This was a period when they had just found out about their pregnancy which was something new to them. At the same time, they were still dealing with acceptance of the pregnancy whether personally or in their relationship. Therefore, they indicated that at this initial stage of pregnancy, they required some form of assurance from someone that they were going to be supported.

I think I needed more support at the beginning. It was something new to me. I kind of needed someone to hold my hand and say “it’s gonna be fine, I’m gonna be therefore you, don’t worry, we’ll get through this together”. [Thandeka, four months pregnant, undergraduate]

In addition, this was the period when they were likely to be hiding the pregnancy from their family when in actual fact, they needed their support. Therefore, they found it difficult to share their stressors with others.

It was difficult before I told my parents because you know when nobody knows at home and you start experiencing these things [disagreements/fights] with your boyfriend and you get pissed, like you wanna tell someone but you can’t. [Tamara, three months pregnant, undergraduate]

Therefore, it is important to receive support at the beginning of pregnancy for better maternal and new-born health outcomes. The different experiences that the participants had in their pregnancies determined what they perceived their support needs to be and the period that they were required.

Throughout pregnancy

Other participants said they required support throughout their pregnancy and into the puerperium because they felt their support needs were not going to change over the course of the pregnancy. Therefore, they said that they needed to receive support through every period of the pregnancy.

Throughout the pregnancy you need support because there are times where you feel like I wish I could just give up everything like you know, school cause sometimes you find it frustrating, and you don’t wanna deal with it. I think you need that pillar of strength every day; someone that will be calling you and asking you ‘How are you doing? How’s everything? How’s the baby?’ Like I think every day during pregnancy even after pregnancy. [Njabulo, six months pregnant, post-graduate]

Towards the end of pregnancy

Some participants felt they needed more support as they approached their delivery date. The support required at this stage was mostly instrumental support. They indicated that it was difficult to balance antenatal care (ANC) schedules at the public clinics and academic obligations in the final trimester. This suggests that in the last trimester of pregnancy, students experience a task overload. For this reason, they need instrumental support in the final trimester of pregnancy.

It was at the end [when she needed more support]. When you feel like the baby is about to come, you have to prepare for everything. With schoolwork it’s very hard. Because at the end, I had to attend clinics more than before, like almost every week. So, the time you are attending clinics and everything, you are using up the time for studying. [Slindile, three weeks puerperium, undergraduate]

One participant expressed her need to always have someone with her so that she would be well prepared in the event of labour.

Mostly it’s at the end when you’ll be delivering (when she needs the most support) because at that time you have a lot of complications, you need someone to look after you because you can deliver anytime. You need to have transport that will take you to the hospital immediately and always bring your card so that you are well prepared. [Thuli, eight months pregnant, undergraduate]

Support post-delivery

Young women usually require support and guidance after childbirth and in the case of students; they need support with childcare as they continue with their studies. Except for two who were not sure, other participants expressed their intention to continue with their studies after their child is born. When asked about childcare, some participants’ responses were that their mothers or female guardians were going to look after the baby upon delivery. In cases where mothers were unavailable due to distance or employment, they were still going to offer support by paying a helper to look after the child. Therefore, parents were also going to provide financial support to a large extent. Young women in this study relied heavily on their own mothers and depended on them for childcare.

I’ll still be in [city name] when I give birth cause am giving birth in September. So, my mom will travel here. My mom said “give me the child then you go back to school” and she’s gonna take care of the baby…In terms of finances my mom will support me. I don’t know about my child’s father whether he’ll be there or not. [Thandeka, four months pregnant, undergraduate]

Those who did not have mothers (due to death) or those whose mothers worked faraway would receive help from other older female members of the family such as aunties and sisters.

My mother`s sister, she lives in Maritzburg [Pietermaritzburg], she did say she can take care of baby once the baby is born so that I can go back to school and study cause that is what I want to do. She was the one who volunteered to do that. [Busi, four months pregnant, undergraduate]

When participants were asked about financial support, some of their accounts revealed that providing for the child’s welfare was the father’s responsibility.

The baby needs so many things so as to grow in a good state; nappies, warm clothes, milk, formula [baby food] since am not going to breastfeed so financially it will be much required from him. [She gives an example]-cause my cousin gave birth in April and the father of the baby hasn’t given her a single cent since she gave birth, since she fell pregnant, she hasn’t received any money from the baby’s daddy and telling me things are difficult, so financially it is so important. [Kholeka, eight months pregnant, undergraduate]

Male partner support needed

One universal theme that emerged in all the interviews with respect to support needs was receiving support from the male partner. Male partner support was considered to be the most important source of support that unmarried pregnant students required. The lack of emotional support from male partners during pregnancy was seen to have grave consequences for both the mother and her unborn baby. These include depression, resentment and abortion.

As much as you are the one carrying the child, you can’t go through everything by yourself. I think if you don’t have your partners’ support, you can end up having resentment towards him, including the child—somebody who has no contribution towards the baby is painful. [Khanyisile, nine months pregnant, second pregnancy, undergraduate]

Partner’s emotional support

Receiving emotional support from partners was the biggest support need among young women. When compared to other support needs, some participants reported that they would rather have their partner to be there for them emotionally than financially. The emotional support required by these participants ranged from the simplest acts of care like being there to talk to them or calling them every day.

I would like to be supported emotionally because money doesn’t buy love. It is the tender loving care that is most important. I appreciate that because that is what is important, that is what I prefer, it’s what I need. [Bongiwe, three months pregnant, undergraduate]

Other participants said that their partners needed to be their greatest source of support because they were the reason why they got pregnant. Therefore, they needed to take responsibility for ‘what they did’ and ‘compensate for their mistake’. This means that male partners were expected to play a major role in providing support and relieving emotional distress.

You know when you are pregnant, I think you expect a lot when you know that this person is the baby’s father, it’s like you want them to do more. You want them to try anyway and compensate for doing what they did to you, because if it wasn’t for him I actually wouldn’t be pregnant so he has to be there for me. [Zinhle, six months pregnant, undergraduate]

There was a general view among some participants that the relationship with their partner should remain as it was before pregnancy or improve with the prospect of a child. However, it was found that in a lot of cases, relationships became weak as the pregnancy progressed. In some cases, the pregnancy led to the end of the relationship. Others revealed that relationships become more about the wellbeing of the unborn baby and less about the romantic relationship between the partners. Some participants reported feeling neglected and expressed longing for a romantic relationship as they did before the pregnancy.

I don`t want him to treat me as the mother of his babies, I want him to treat me also as his girlfriend. Now we usually talk about the baby a lot. We don’t talk about us. I want us to date like we used to before, go out with him, watch some movies and get a lot of support from him. [Thuli, eight months pregnant, undergraduate]

Partner’s instrumental support

Having a partner who is available to provide material goods and help with tasks was important among the participants. Instrumental support such as having the partner’s company when they go places and buying them foods that they crave for was considered to be an important support need. The smallest acts of help with tasks were considered to be of great importance even in cases where partners could not offer financial support.

Sometimes people ask questions about him [her partner] when you are walking alone. I need the support. If he was not there for me, it would have hurt me you know, to know that people are laughing at me. [Kholeka, eight months pregnant, undergraduate]

One participant complained about her partner who is not usually willing to help her with tasks.

Sometimes he’ll be sleeping [when he visits her in her campus room] and I have to do my schoolwork then when I ask him to do something like can you please get me some water, sometimes he’s gonna be like he’s tired or when I want him to do something for me he’s gonna complain. [Zinhle, six months pregnant, undergraduate]

Instrumental support was considered to be crucial particularly in matters involving doctors’ appointments and preparations for the arrival of the baby. In cases of medical emergencies, partners were required to be present. Going to the hospital together was considered to be an important aspect of instrumental support as it assured them that they were not going through their pregnancy alone.

Before I fell pregnant, I really didn’t notice anything, and it didn’t matter. Now it’s more like I want more, more time with him. Sometimes when you go to the clinic and you see people with their boyfriends and then I’ll be thinking like, where’s mine? I also want him to be here and experience this together. [Amahle, seven months pregnant, undergraduate]

Partner’s financial support

All the participants said that their tuition is paid by their parents. Therefore, the financial resources expected from male partners were for issues concerning the pregnancy. Financial needs from partners included money to buy food that they crave, maternity clothes, hospital bills and items for the baby. However, more financial support was expected after delivery as compared to during pregnancy.

I need him not to run away from his responsibilities when the baby is here, that’s all I’m just hoping for, that he’ll be a father and support his child. [Lindiwe, eight months pregnant, undergraduate]

Financial support did not always mean receiving money from their partners. Having their partners buy or pay for their needs was also regarded as financial support.

Well, my partner is not good at giving money and all that, but he can do everything and anything to support me, he put me on his medical aid [medical insurance], he can buy me anything that I crave for, but giving money no. So, he supports me, yes. [Naledi, seven months pregnant, second pregnancy, post-graduate]

The payment of damages (Inhlawulo- in Zulu law, is a fine paid to the family of a woman who became pregnant out of wedlock by the father of the future child) was considered to be a form of financial support as it was money that could be used by the family to support the pregnant women. This study found that some of the participant’s partners had not paid this fine to the young woman’s family. In the current study, men who paid damages to their partner’s family were perceived to be more responsible and could be entrusted with caring for them. The payment of damages was observed to have a calming effect on angry parents and associated with a more positive attitude towards the pregnancy. Therefore, it was considered as a type of support that was required of partners to assure the family that he would honour his responsibility.

My sister is the one who advised me about [partner] paying the damage in December because that is when my dad is coming from Joburg. I want him (father) to know that even if he chases me [from his house], he will know that everything was done perfect and I’m not staying with, what can I say, a thug or anything. I want him to know that am staying with the real man. [Mbali, seven months pregnant, undergraduate]

On the other hand, men who did not pay damages were seen as untrustworthy.

To be honest sometimes I think he is going to run away, since he hasn`t paid damages and he can see the other girls, and forget about me you know, you know how boys are. [Nomthandazo, four weeks puerperium, undergraduate]

Health systems role on social support and influence on male partner support

Health professionals are able to contribute to the psychological wellbeing of women during pregnancy and during the postpartum period by offering support. When asked about their experiences at ANC clinics, some participants reported that the health staff at the clinics had a negative attitude towards them. They felt stigmatized because of their age and status as students, and this was because of what the nurses would say about them.

Ooh at first, I had hell, like the nurses ask you basic questions: “how old are you?” Then when you say 18 then everybody is like “hau?” then instantly when you say you go to [institution name] everybody assumes like “no wonder, it’s expected”. [continues to mimic] “Where’s the baby’s daddy?” Am like “he’s working”. They’re like “yeah, you have a working baby’s daddy because that’s what you do”. They weren’t really saying it to my face, but you can hear them gossiping. [Siyanda, four months, undergraduate]

When asked about how the health systems influence male partner support among pregnant students, particularly partner ANC attendance, almost all the participants said they had never attended an ANC session with their partner. Some participants said their partners did not want to go to the clinics with them because of the female dominated environment at the clinic and the amount of time spent at the clinic. In addition, nurses did not seem to be concerned about the absence of partners.

I wanted him to be there, but he suggested that no, he will remain behind, or he will go with me and leave me there. Personally, I understand why he doesn’t want to stay with me. Clinics are just something else, many people and you wait for hours. The nurses don’t even ask about my partner. [Kholeka, eight months pregnant, undergraduate]

Some participants explained that they were not attending ANC in public clinics but instead were consulting specialists like gynaecologists and obstetricians in private hospitals to monitor their pregnancy. This was mostly because they felt that they needed to be checked by specialists who were not readily available in public clinics.

With my partner first of all he said he doesn’t want me to go to clinics and all that, so he put me on his medical aid [medical insurance]. He didn’t want me to be going to the clinics. There’s nothing wrong with the clinic but for me he preferred the gynaecologist who is gonna do everything. [Naledi, seven months pregnant, second pregnancy, post-graduate]

Some participants mentioned that their partner did accompany them to the clinic on first visit but did not do so on subsequent visits. While they had the desire to have their partners come to the clinics with them, they mentioned that they did not see the purpose because nurses at the clinic did not involve men in any of the activities.

He came with me to the clinic on my second appointment, when I was about four months. It means a lot to have someone with you. But they didn’t ask him any questions or asked him to do any tests. [Slindile, three weeks puerperium, undergraduate]

Overall, it was established that most unmarried pregnant students seek ANC in public clinics and hospitals alone without the support of their male partners. The participants generally considered ANC to be unfriendly. In addition, partner attendance was not specifically encouraged or recommended by healthcare workers.

Discussion

Unmarried pregnant students need emotional, instrumental and informational support. Research on social support has consistently found that the absence of social support is a significant risk factor for antenatal and postnatal depression and anxiety among pregnant women [37, 38]. This study sought to explore the support needs of young unmarried students in an academic setting during pregnancy and the puerperium. Our findings suggest that the socio-cultural context of pregnancy among young unmarried students results in social stigma. Unmarried pregnant students are stigmatized in the academic environment as well as in the community. This study found that these students are sometimes ignored by their peers because of the pregnancy. This leads to social isolation, a common effect of pregnancy among young people [39]. Social isolation has been associated with loneliness, emotional distress and depressive symptoms. Experiencing depressive symptoms in pregnancy has consequences for maternal and child health outcomes because it is associated with low birth weight [40].

Four different types of social support (emotional, instrumental, informational, and financial) were highlighted as an important resource to cope with stressors by all participants. Although financial support is usually categorised as instrumental support, in this study we categorised it as an independent form of support as it was a salient theme in the study. Emotional support was described as having people who are available to share their feelings with, encourage them and show acts of caring towards them. Instrumental support expressed by participants included receiving help with tasks such as going for medical check-ups. The participants in our study indicated that they require informational support, which is receiving information on pregnancy, childbirth and how to take care of a new-born baby. Lastly, financial support was needed to buy food, to cover transport costs and medical expenses and to prepare for the arrival of the unborn baby. All these types of support play a role in fostering positive maternal and child health outcomes. However, appraisal support did not emerge as an important source of social support in this study and this could be because most of the participants were still pregnant and felt they did not need evaluative feedback. Yet, this form of support could have been of great value to them after delivery as they engage in motherhood duties such as feeding and bathing the infant.

An important finding of our study is that, among the different types of social support needed, emotional support was deemed more important by the participants. Pregnancy was associated with loneliness and fear of being judged for falling pregnant within an academic setting. The young women desired to be listened to and loved more especially because of their condition which was associated with various stressors. Although a previous study reported on the importance of emotional support during pregnancy, it was not regarded as the most important type of support needed [41]. The provision of re-assurance, feeling valued and sympathetic listening result in feelings of comfort and is associated with decreased levels of depressed mood and anxiety during pregnancy and postnatal [26]. In line with Cohen and Will’s [42] stress buffering hypothesis of social support, unmarried pregnant students perceive emotional support to buffer the effects of psychological distress during pregnancy. Previous studies have also shown that perceived social support may have a positive effect on pregnant women causing them to perceive their pregnancy as less stressful and providing a resource for effectively dealing with stressful situations such as labor [43, 44].

For unmarried pregnant students, who usually stay at university residences, instrumental support was perceived as important in assisting to balance the academic demands and pregnancy-related demands. The pregnancy came with additional responsibilities such as regular visits to the clinic and performing previously manageable tasks was perceived as daunting as a result of the pregnancy. A study in Ghana among women with new-borns and various community stakeholders found that women were dependent on network members for instrumental support to get them to a health facility for childbirth [45]. However, instrumental support seemed unavailable to pregnant women residing at university residences as they did not stay with their families. The narratives of the participants revealed that young women, particularly first-time mothers were usually inexperienced with pregnancy and childbirth and need advice and information. In a previous study, 70% of first-time pregnant women indicated that they needed information about pregnancy and childbirth [46]. The participants expressed a lack of knowledge regarding pregnancy-related sickness, delivery process, and dietary needs as well as taking care of the newly born child. A recent study among adolescent pregnant women has shown knowledge deficit on the benefits of ANC and nutrition during pregnancy, that may contribute to poor pregnancy outcomes [47].

Our study sought to understand the stage at which social support was deemed more important by the unmarried pregnant students. Social support was identified as important at different phases of pregnancy. In the first few months of pregnancy, the expectant mother develops new and often uncomfortable physical and emotional symptoms such as nausea, feelings of uncertainty and increased emotional expressions [48, 49]. In the early stages of the pregnancy, young women desired support from significant others as they were still in the process of embracing the pregnancy and thus required acceptance and assurance that they would be supported throughout the whole pregnancy experience. Towards the end of the pregnancy, informational support was deemed more important to help balance between academic demands and regular visits to the clinic. More so, the narratives from most of the participants indicate that support was necessary throughout the whole period of pregnancy and after giving birth. The various stressors faced by unmarried pregnant students came at different stages of the pregnancy and were accentuated by the challenging academic environments characterised by high workload, meeting deadlines and socio-economic issues [50, 51]. Thus, an enduring and reliable support network was essential.

While support from different sources is important for unmarried pregnant students, participants identified male partner support as their most important source of support. Unlike community-dwelling women in Bangladesh who cited mothers and sisters-in-law as top sources of emotional support [41], participants desired their partners to be emotionally available and care for them since they were partly involved in conceiving the child. Male partners are expected to take responsibility and be available to offer emotional support to young women throughout pregnancy and after childbirth. The availability of support from male partners gives women a more positive attitude towards their pregnancy and assures them that they are not alone thereby reducing emotional distress [19]. Partner support is an important protective factor throughout conception and pregnancy and our study corroborate these findings. Importantly, participants did not want to be perceived by their partners as mothers only, but as lovers, as that entailed emotional connection. This type of support and relationship status was deemed more important than financial support. A study among couples indicated that more prenatal shared leisure predicted higher marital love and less conflict when the baby was 1 year old [52]. Even though participants in the current study were unmarried it seems that they would benefit from spending more quality time with their partners. A previous study showed that male partners who did not approve an unplanned pregnancy were less likely to be emotionally available increasing the risk of psychological distress in women [3]. In instances where emotional support from male partners is not feasible, there is a need to design interventions that will assist unmarried pregnant students in identifying alternate sources of support such as counselling support, seeking social support from friends and their social circles as well as through the social media.

Partners’ instrumental and financial supports were also considered to be important sources of support. The participants wanted to be accompanied to clinic visits and experience the pregnancy process with their partners. In previous studies, male involvement in maternal and new-born health has been associated with a variety of improved health outcomes including increased maternal access to antenatal and postnatal services, improved maternal mental health and reduced postpartum depression [53, 54]. In some African cultures, payment of damages is perceived as a form of acceptance of paternity [55]. This process was perceived by the participants to give a form of dignity to her family and some assurance that the father was prepared to take care of the child. However, similar to a previous study, expectations of partner support (emotional, instrumental and financial) are not usually met resulting in disappointment, conflicts with their partners and sometimes difficult break ups [56]. The current study found that experiencing an unintended pregnancy can lead to the disruption of a relationship. These findings complement the results of research showing that unplanned pregnancies are accompanied by family disruption and a decline in the marital quality and the couple’s relationships [3, 57]. This results in emotional distress for unmarried pregnant students who may have to experience pregnancy without the support of their partner.

Unmarried pregnant students experienced social stigma at health facilities. This finding is consistent with the results from a previous study among healthcare providers in Ugu district in southern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa which showed that health personnel exhibit a negative attitude towards pregnant young women [58]. The South Africa Department of Health guidelines recommend that pregnant women seek ANC as soon as they suspect a pregnancy and encourages all pregnant women to attend at least eight ANC visits [59]. However, the experience of social stigma at public health facilities is likely to result in unmarried pregnant students shunning ANC, yet most of them cannot afford to use private healthcare services. Young women in our study also expressed the desire to have male partners attend ANC visits with them. However, it was reported that this does not usually happen due to the amount of time spent at ANC clinics, the female dominated environment and the negative attitudes from the nurses. These findings add to previous research which demonstrated that the main barrier to male participation in ANC was the healthcare facility environment [60]. Further, during ANC visits, nurses only ask about the existence of male partners but do not necessarily encourage partner attendance of ANC. Therefore, there is minimal influence from the healthcare professionals on emphasizing partner attendance of ANC, their perceived roles and benefit to the mother and the baby. Health systems have a role to play in fostering supportive relationships between pregnant women and their partners. Partner support and involvement in maternal healthcare has been shown to enhance maternal health outcomes [61].

Among women of all ages, pregnancy is associated with a myriad of stressors. In the contexts of academic institutions, pregnancy-related stressors are likely to add to the academic challenges faced by female students [62]. Absence or lack of emotional social support from significant others, particularly partners may exacerbate the stressors of pregnancy among students. Tertiary institutions should partner with established social initiatives offering services for men in the country to engage and mentor young men one-on-one and in groups about the importance of the father’s role in the child’s development and how to best support their partners to improve pregnancy outcomes, irrespective of relationship status. Culturally sensitive health promotion programmes targeted at ‘father inclusive’ practices and behaviour change communication programmes to stimulate social support may have positive changes in terms of the supportive role of partners [63]. To reach many young men, implementers of such programmes should consider adopting innovative outreach strategies that appeal to young men’s interests in their hang-out spots, such as bars and sports arenas.

Male involvement programmes can be integrated in ANC whereby services are restructured to accommodate male partners to ensure a sense of involvement and responsibility. However, for these programmes to work, the ANC environment should be user friendly for young women and their partners. A rights-based approach must be consistently adopted when delivering maternal healthcare [64]. Training and on-going education should be prioritised for healthcare workers regarding the provision of positive, respectful and supportive non-judgmental antenatal and postnatal care to their clients irrespective of their age or marital status. Pregnancy at universities is not uncommon and having clinics at university campuses equipped with comprehensive ANC may overcome some structural barriers such as the burden of transport costs and long waiting times at public clinics.

Strengths and limitations

To our knowledge, this is the first study to present a rich description of the perspectives about social support needs and the period when most support is needed by unmarried pregnant university students in South Africa. We also sampled until data saturation to ensure that a sufficient quantity and quality data was collected. However, the snowball method of sampling that was used meant that the initial participants, who were indigenous African students, recommended other pregnant students in their social network, who were also indigenous African students. As a result, potential participants from other racial groups did not participate in this study. Therefore, the findings could be biased and be a representation of experiences and perceptions of pregnant indigenous African students. Also, the findings of this study apply only to pregnant students who are unmarried and does not apply to those pregnant students who are in a marriage or engaged to be married. Future studies should include different racial groups to capture the experiences of pregnant students of all races and also include married and unmarried students to compare and contrast their support needs.

Conclusion

This study identified support needs of pregnant women in their transition to motherhood. Among the support needs of unmarried pregnant students, emotional support is perceived to be the most important type of support. Male partners appear to be the most sought-after source of emotional support for unmarried pregnant students as they desire to experience the emotional connection that existed before the pregnancy and fear the possibility of abandonment. Given the several challenges that they are faced with, unmarried pregnant students need all the available support to enhance wellbeing as they try to cope with academic and pregnancy-related stressors.

Supporting information

S1 File. Minimal underlying data.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere thanks to the participants for the value they added to the study.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Erfina E, Widyawati W, McKenna L, Reisenhofer S, Ismail D. Adolescent mothers’ experiences of the transition to motherhood: An integrative review. Int J Nurs Sci. 2019;6(2):221–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2019.03.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schetter CD, Tanner L. Anxiety, depression and stress in pregnancy: implications for mothers, children, research, and practice. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2012;25(2):141–148. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283503680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Barton K, Redshaw M, Quigley MA, Carson C. Unplanned pregnancy and subsequent psychological distress in partnered women: a cross-sectional study of the role of relationship quality and wider social support. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):1–9. 10.1186/s12884-017-1223-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Atuyambe L, Mirembe F, Annika J, Kirumira EK, Faxelid E. Seeking safety and empathy: adolescent health seeking behavior during pregnancy and early motherhood in central Uganda. J Adolesc. 2009;32(4):781–96. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.10.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mabetha K, Soepnel L, Klingberg S, Mabena G, Motlhatlhedi M, Norris SA, et al. Social Support during pregnancy: A phenomenological exploration of young women’s experiences of support networks on pregnancy care and wellbeing in Soweto, South Africa. medRxiv. 2022:2022–04 [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hijazi HH, Alyahya MS, Al Abdi RM, Alolayyan MN, Sindiani AM, Raffee LA, et al. The impact of perceived social support during pregnancy on postpartum infant-focused anxieties: A prospective cohort study of mothers in Northern Jordan. Int J Womens Health. 2021; 21:973–89. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S329487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Colciago E, Merazzi B, Panzeri M, Fumagalli S, Nespoli A. Women’s vulnerability within the childbearing continuum: A scoping review. Eur J Midwifery. 2020;12(4):18. doi: 10.18332/ejm/120003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mbelle N, Mabaso M, Setswe G, Sifunda S. Predictors of unplanned pregnancies among female students at South African Technical and Vocational Education and Training colleges: Findings from the 2014 Higher Education and Training HIV and AIDS survey. S Afr Med J. 2018;108(6):511–6. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2018.v108i6.12744 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Belay D, Alem A, Zerihun S, Antehun G, Nega Z, Zeleke B, et al. Unintended pregnancy and associated factors among unmarried female students: A case of Bahir Dar University. Heliyon. 2020;6(6):e04309. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mutinta G. Unplanned pregnancy among female students at universities in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Afr J Reprod Health. 2022;26(7):29–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Republic of South Africa. Choice of Termination of Pregnancy Act, No 92 of 1996. Government gazette. 1996. https://www.gov.za/sites/www.gov.za/files/Act92of1996.pdf
  • 12.Harries J, Daskilewicz K, Bessenaar T, Gerdts C. Understanding abortion seeking care outside of formal health care settings in Cape Town, South Africa: a qualitative study. Repro Health. 2021;18:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01243-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mosley EA, King EJ, Schulz AJ, Harris LH, De Wet N, Anderson BA. Abortion attitudes among South Africans: findings from the 2013 social attitudes survey. Cult Health Sex. 2017;19(8):918–33. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2016.1272715 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wahn EH, Nissen E. Sociodemographic background, lifestyle and psychosocial conditions of Swedish teenage mothers and their perception of health and social support during pregnancy and childbirth. Scand J Public Health. 2008;36(4):415–23. doi: 10.1177/1403494807085315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Birkeland R, Thompson JK, Phares V. Adolescent motherhood and postpartum depression. J Clin Child Psychol. 2005;34(2):292–300. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3402_8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kerie S, Menberu M, Niguse W. Prevalence and associated factors of postpartum depression in Southwest, Ethiopia, 2017: a cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11:1–7. 10.1186/s13104-018-3730-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Figueiredo B, Bifulco A, Pacheco A, Costa R, Magarinho R. Teenage pregnancy, attachment style, and depression: A comparison of teenage and adult pregnant women in a Portuguese series. Attach Hum Dev. 2006;8(2):123–38. doi: 10.1080/14616730600785686 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hildingsson I, Tingvall M, Rubertsson C. Partner support in the childbearing period—A follow up study. Women Birth. 2008;21(4):141–8. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2008.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stapleton LR, Schetter CD, Westling E, Rini C, Glynn LM, Hobel CJ, et al. Perceived partner support in pregnancy predicts lower maternal and infant distress. J Fam Psychol. 2012;26(3):453–463. doi: 10.1037/a0028332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pascoe MC, Hetrick SE, Parker AG. The impact of stress on students in secondary school and higher education. Int J Adolesc Youth. 2020;25(1):104–12. 10.1080/02673843.2019.1596823 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mudhovozi P. Social and academic adjustment of first-year university students. J Soc Sci. 2012;33(2):251–9. 10.1080/09718923.2012.11893103 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.House J., Work stress and social support. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley; 1981. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Raman S, Srinivasan K, Kurpad A, Dwarkanath P, Ritchie J, Worth H. ‘My Mother… My Sisters… and My Friends’: Sources of maternal support in the perinatal period in urban India. Midwifery. 2014;30(1):130–7. 10.1016/j.midw.2013.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cofie LE, Barrington C, Sodzi-Tettey S, Ennett S, Maman S, Singh K. A qualitative study of women’s network social support and facility delivery in rural Ghana. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0206429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.McDonald AD, McDonald JC, Armstrong B, Cherry NM, Nolin AD, Robert D. Prematurity and work in pregnancy. Occup Environ Med. 1988;45(1):56–62. doi: 10.1136/oem.45.1.56 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.McLeish J, Redshaw M. Mothers’ accounts of the impact on emotional wellbeing of organised peer support in pregnancy and early parenthood: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):1–4. 10.1186/s12884-017-1220-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Iranzad I, Bani S, Hasanpour S, Mohammadalizadeh S, Mirghafourvand M. Perceived social support and stress among pregnant women at health centers of Iran-Tabriz. J Caring Sci. 2014;3(4):287–295. doi: 10.5681/jcs.2014.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ginja S, Coad J, Bailey E, Kendall S, Goodenough T, Nightingale S, et al. Associations between social support, mental wellbeing, self-efficacy and technology use in first-time antenatal women: data from the BaBBLeS cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):1–1. 10.1186/s12884-018-2049-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ulin PR, Robinson ET, Tolley EE. Qualitative Methods in Public Health: A Field Guide for Applied Research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000;23(4):334–40. doi: 10.1002/1098-240x(200008)23:4<334::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Polkinghorne DE. Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. J Couns Psychol. 2005;52(2):137. 10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.137 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Padfield M, Procter I. The effect of interviewer’s gender on the interviewing process: A comparative enquiry. Sociology. 1996;30(2):355–66. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Babbie E. Research design. The practice of social research. 12th ed. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rice PL, Ezzy D. Qualitative research methods: A health focus. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lambert VA, Lambert CE. Qualitative descriptive research: An acceptable design. Pac Rim Int J Nurs Res. 2012;16(4):255–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Shafaie FS, Mirghafourvand M, Rahmati M, Nouri P, Bagherinia M. Association between psychological status with perceived social support in pregnant women referring to Tabriz health centers. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(12):1554–60. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1319934 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rashid A, Mohd R. Poor social support as a risk factor for antenatal depressive symptoms among women attending public antennal clinics in Penang, Malaysia. Reprod. Health. 2017;14(1):1–8. 10.1186/s12978-017-0404-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ellis-Sloan K, Tamplin A. Teenage mothers and social isolation: The role of friendship as protection against relational exclusion. Soc Policy Soc. 2019. Apr;18(2):203–18. https://doi:10.1017/S1474746418000106 [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Li X, Gao R, Dai X, Liu H, Zhang J, Liu X, et al. The association between symptoms of depression during pregnancy and low birth weight: a prospective study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2020;20(1):1–7. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2842-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Edmonds JK, Paul M, Sibley LM. Type, content, and source of social support perceived by women during pregnancy: Evidence from Matlab, Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr. 2011;29(2):163–173. doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v29i2.7859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cohen S, Wills TA. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1985;98(2):310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Giesbrecht GF, Poole JC, Letourneau N, Campbell T, Kaplan BJ, APrON Study Team. The buffering effect of social support on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function during pregnancy. Psychosom Med. 2013;75(9):856–62. https://doi:10.1097/PSY.0000000000000004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Basharpoor S, Heydarirad H, Daryadel SJ, Heydari F, Ghamari Givi H, Kishore J. The role of perceived stress and social support among predicting anxiety in pregnant women. J Holist Nurs Midwifery. 2017;27(2):9–16. https://doi:10.18869/acadpub.hnmj.27.2.9 [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Moyer CA, Adongo PB, Aborigo RA, Hodgson A, Engmann CM. ‘They treat you like you are not a human being’: maltreatment during labour and delivery in rural northern Ghana. Midwifery. 2014;30(2):262–8. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Singh D, Newburn M, Smith N, Wiggins M. The information needs of first-time pregnant mothers. Br. J. Midwifery. 2002;10(1):54–8. 10.12968/bjom.2002.10.1.10054 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kululanga LI, Kadango A, Lungu G, Jere D, Ngwale M, Kumbani LC. Knowledge deficit on health promotion activities during pregnancy: the case for adolescent pregnant women at Chiladzulu District, Malawi. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03386-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bjelica A, Cetkovic N, Trninic-Pjevic A, Mladenovic-Segedi L. The phenomenon of pregnancy-A psychological view. Ginekol Polska. 2018;89(2):102–6. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2018.0017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bonillas CA, Feehan R. Normalizing the changes experienced during each trimester of pregnancy. J Perinat Educ. 2008;17(1):39–43. doi: 10.1624/105812408X266287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Reddy KJ, Menon KR, Thattil A. Academic stress and its sources among university students. Biomed Pharmacol J. 2018;11(1):531–7. 10.13005/bpj/1404 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kumaraswamy N. Academic stress, anxiety and depression among college students: A brief review. Int rev soc sci humanit. 2013;5(1):135–43. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Claxton A, Perry‐Jenkins M. No fun anymore: Leisure and marital quality across the transition to parenthood. J Marriage Fam. 2008;70(1):28–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00459.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tokhi M, Comrie-Thomson L, Davis J, Portela A, Chersich M, Luchters S. Involving men to improve maternal and newborn health: a systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0191620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yargawa J, Leonardi-Bee J. Male involvement and maternal health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015;69(6):604–12. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-204784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Nathane-Taulela M, Nduna M. Young women’s experiences following discovering a biological father in Mpumalanga province, South Africa. Open Fam Stud J. 2014;6(1):62–68. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Govender D, Naidoo S, Taylor M. “I have to provide for another life emotionally, physically and financially”: understanding pregnancy, motherhood and the future aspirations of adolescent mothers in KwaZulu-Natal South, Africa. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):1–21. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03319-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kazemi A, Ghaedrahmati M, Kheirabadi G. Partner’s emotional reaction to pregnancy mediates the relationship between pregnancy planning and prenatal mental health. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):1–8. 10.1186/s12884-021-03644-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Govender D, Taylor M, Naidoo S. Adolescent pregnancy and parenting: Perceptions of healthcare providers. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020;13:1607–1628. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S258576 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.National Department of Health, South Africa. Guidelines for Maternity Care in South Africa. A Manual for Clinics, Community Health Centres and District Hospitals. 4th ed. Pretoria: NDoH, 2015:172. http://www.health.gov.za/index.php/2014-03-17-09-9-38/policies-and-guidelines/category/230-2015p# [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gibore NS, Bali TA. Community perspectives: An exploration of potential barriers to men’s involvement in maternity care in a central Tanzanian community. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0232939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232939 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Forbes F, Wynter K, Wade C, Zeleke BM, Fisher J. Male partner attendance at antenatal care and adherence to antenatal care guidelines: secondary analysis of 2011 Ethiopian demographic and health survey data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1775-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Pogoy AM, Verzosa R, Coming NS, Agustino RG. Lived experiences of early pregnancy among teenagers: a phenomenological study. Eur Sci J. 2014;10(2). [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Jeong J, Sullivan EF, McCann JK, McCoy DC, Yousafzai AK. Implementation characteristics of father‐inclusive interventions in low‐and middle‐income countries: A systematic review. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2022; 1520:34–52. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14941 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.World Health Organization. A human rights-based approach to health, 2015. https://www.who.int/hhr/news/hrba_to_health2.pdf. Accessed 25 Jul 2021. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Tara Tancred

16 Nov 2022

PONE-D-22-16990

Experiences of social support among unmarried pregnant university students in South Africa.

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Akintola,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

I thank the authors for this very interesting and important manuscript. The reviewers have raised some important and extensive points, which I would like to see fully addressed before further consideration of this manuscript. Additionally, please read through the manuscript very closely for typographical and wording errors. 

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 26 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Tara Tancred, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/fileid=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf.

2. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

3. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

4. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ.

Additional Editor Comments:

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Research ethics: It is indeed important to observe research ethics but this does not justify your statement that 'data cannot be shared publicly because of privacy and confidentiality issues'. You can anonymize the transcripts and make them publicly available. Already you have used pseudonyms to protect the identity of participants (Line 210 and Table 1). You have correctly indicated (Line 166) that 'issues relating to pregnancy among young people are sensitive' but you have revealed the identity of the institution where data was collected (Lines 160, 161 & 163). I suggest that the name of the university be concealed.

Participants: The study is among unmarried pregnant university students as you clearly indicated in the title (Line 1) and some other places in the manuscript. I find it confusing when you refer to participants as 'pregnant women'; 'pregnant young women'; 'unmarried pregnant students'; young unmarried women' in Lines 46, 147, 321, 555 and at some other places. I suggest that a concept to refer to participants be identified and be used consistently. Looking at the age of the participants (Table 2), is it appropriate to refer to all of them as young women? I suggest that Table 1 be moved to Results as it reflects what the study found.

It is a good practice to describe the qualifications and experiences of researchers in a qualitative research. The description (Lines 174 - 179) of the first author (TMP) is correct, and I suggest that the other authors be described as well.

Language: Replace Master's (Lines 175 - 177) with Masters. School (Lines 242, 482) should be replaced with university. The manner of writing ANC (Lines 527, 536 and 551) should rectified. Write in full with abbreviation in brackets on first time use, then abbreviation thereafter. The concept 'clinics' (Lines 536 - 538) needs to be clarified as specialists run clinics in both private and government/public health services. Lines 551 - 557 regarding ANC need to be rephrased as ANC is available through private and public health facilities. Furthermore, pregnant women can deliver in a public hospital even when they did not attend ANC at a public/government facility or even when they did not attend ANC at all. Therefore, Lines 668 - 669 should be revised. Line 553 - 554 contradicts itself regarding affordability of private healthcare (none & except), see also Lines 670 - 671 regarding ability to pay for private healthcare. Pregnancy and conception (Line 639) should be conception and pregnancy.

Description of study design (Lines 150 - 158) should be rephrased to clarify if qualitative research is a design or a method. Based on what you wrote in Line 157, the appropriate design appears to be a narrative design or even a phenomenological design might be suitable.

Indicate under Data collection if field notes were collected or not as they are important to add to the context of the interviews.

Data analysis: Indicate (Line 209) that data was transcribed verbatim. This is only indicated in the Abstract (Line 39), but it is important to indicate this in the main document.

Results: Indicate the number of sub-themes in Line 229. Line 239 should say sub-themes, not themes. Clarify also 'four main subthemes arose (Line 334). Is the word 'main' necessary? The following concepts [many of the participants; several participants; most participants; a few of the participants] are not appropriate to report qualitative findings as they suggest numbers; appropriate concepts are some participates, other participants and others. Writing just 'participants' may also imply that it is all participants who shared that experience. I found both appropriate and inappropriate concepts in this manuscript and suggest that the inappropriate concepts be replaced. Line 311 should acknowledge that some participants had previous pregnancies and therefore knew what to expect. Lines 319 - 321 and 330 - 331 appears to be misplaced; they would suit the Discussion section.

Context: It is important to mention if these pregnancies were planned or not, if participants disclosed their pregnancies to whoever they expected to give social support and whether they are still in a continuing and healthy relationships with the partner who impregnated them. Where (on-campus or off-campus) and with whom were participants staying? Lines 599, 606-607 are not clear regarding where participants were staying.

Discussion: Lines 590 and 648-649 give an impression that types of social support were rated in this study. Rating is a quantitative concept. Lines 653-656 should say some African cultures because in some communities in South Africa, paying damages means admission that one has impregnated a women by paying a fine and not a commitment to support the child financially (paying damages is a once-off payment). Is Line 655 referring to all participants?

Recommendation: It is not clear on which findings are the recommendations on behaviour change programme (Line 688) and rights-based approach (Line 639) based. Who are the 'antenatal health personnel' in Line 695?

Reviewer #2: There is need to rephrase the topic to experiences of unmarried pregnant students on male partner social support to speak to the background of the study.

On abstract the section of methods line 35, the candidates say perceptions there must be consistency in usage of words, what is explored are experiences.

40-41 the results should be reported in line with the study aim which is pregnant women support needs and when it was needed the most.

Under line 150, it should be clear which research design under qualitative research approach was employed that informed the thematic content analysis.

Under 171 how many students were snowballed were in puerperal period.

Line 145 should specify the experiences from unmarried pregnant students are about "male social support".

119-144 provides an impression that the social support explored is only from male partners. Line 147 emphasis the said point which contradicts the study topic.

On line 197 the interview indicates that the schedule elicited the support needs of pregnant students and the period when most support is needed. The results should be aligned to what the interview guide elicited

on line 149, the section on study objectives should be included.

line 171-173, how many peripheral students were identified, only pregnant student are mentioned.

Under 189, what ethical codes were considered in this study and the study is sensitive in nature, how was the emotional risk addressed.

Line 205, What was used to record data and where was data stored.

Under 226, I suggest authors remove the social support needs from the general social network. That is, the first section of social support needs can be deleted, and the results presents the social support needs from participants male partners and the period they needed the support in order to align with the strong assertions made in the background.

558 most participants are undergraduates and what implications does this have to the present study. The socio-economic background of participants is something that could have been explored from the participants. What recommendations can be made to deal with students emotional risk that the lack of male partner support impose on unmarried pregnant students. Additionally, what strategies can be recommended to cultivate a culture of male social support towards their female pregnant partners.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Sogo F Matlala

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Apr 24;18(4):e0284906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284906.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


4 Feb 2023

Reviewer #1: Research ethics: It is indeed important to observe research ethics but this does not justify your statement that data cannot be shared publicly because of privacy and confidentiality issues. You can anonymize the transcripts and make them publicly available. Already you have used pseudonyms to protect the identity of participants (Line 210 and Table 1).

We have provided the minimal underlying data as a supporting (supplementary) information file.

You have correctly indicated (Line 166) that 'issues relating to pregnancy among young people are sensitive' but you have revealed the identity of the institution where data was collected (Lines 160, 161 & 163). I suggest that the name of the university be concealed.

Thank you for this suggestion. We have not revealed the name of the University where the study was conducted in the manuscript.

Participants: The study is among unmarried pregnant university students as you clearly indicated in the title (Line 1) and some other places in the manuscript. I find it confusing when you refer to participants as 'pregnant women'; 'pregnant young women'; 'unmarried pregnant students'; young unmarried women' in Lines 46, 147, 321, 555 and at some other places. I suggest that a concept to refer to participants be identified and be used consistently. Looking at the age of the participants (Table 2), is it appropriate to refer to all of them as young women?

Thank you for this comment. We have chosen to refer to participants as “unmarried pregnant students” throughout the manuscript.

I suggest that Table 1 be moved to Results as it reflects what the study found.

We have moved Table 1 to the Findings section as suggested.

It is a good practice to describe the qualifications and experiences of researchers in a qualitative research. The description (Lines 174 - 179) of the first author (TMP) is correct, and I suggest that the other authors be described as well.

We have added a brief description of the qualifications and experiences of all the researchers who collaborated in the development of the manuscript. For example: “OA is a Public Health Promotion and Research Methods specialist” and “PN; a post-doctoral fellow and researcher”.

Language: Replace Master's (Lines 175 - 177) with Masters.

We have made the correction and replaced Master's with Masters.

School (Lines 242, 482) should be replaced with university.

Thank you for this correction. We have used the term “university” in line 245 and “tuition” in line 485.

The manner of writing ANC (Lines 527, 536 and 551) should rectified. Write in full with abbreviation in brackets on first time use, then abbreviation thereafter.

We have rectified this error and also rectified in the different sections of the manuscript.

The concept 'clinics' (Lines 536 - 538) needs to be clarified as specialists run clinics in both private and government/public health services.

Thank you for this suggestion. We have clarified the concept “clinics” and explained that, “Some participants explained that they were not attending ANC in public clinics but instead were consulting specialists like gynaecologists and obstetricians in private hospitals to monitor their pregnancy. This was mostly because they felt that they needed to be checked by specialists who were not readily available in public clinics”.

Lines 551 - 557 regarding ANC need to be rephrased as ANC is available through private and public health facilities.

We have revised this section and removed some material as it was not relevant. This section now reads: “Overall, it was established that most unmarried pregnant students seek ANC in public clinics and hospitals alone without the support of their male partners. The participants generally considered ANC to be unfriendly. In addition, partner attendance was not specifically encouraged or recommended by healthcare workers”.

Furthermore, pregnant women can deliver in a public hospital even when they did not attend ANC at a public/government facility or even when they did not attend ANC at all. Therefore, Lines 668 - 669 should be revised.

Thank you for this correction. We have amended the section and explained that, “The South Africa Department of Health guidelines recommend that pregnant women seek ANC as soon as they suspect a pregnancy and encourages all pregnant women to attend at least eight ANC visits”.

Line 553 - 554 contradicts itself regarding affordability of private healthcare (none & except), see also Lines 670 - 671 regarding ability to pay for private healthcare.

We have removed this contradicting sentence.

Pregnancy and conception (Line 639) should be conception and pregnancy.

Thank you for this correction, we have amended to highlight the suggested change.

Description of study design (Lines 150 - 158) should be rephrased to clarify if qualitative research is a design or a method. Based on what you wrote in Line 157, the appropriate design appears to be a narrative design or even a phenomenological design might be suitable.

We have rephrased in the manuscript and included “descriptive” qualitative research design. There are a number of researchers who believe and support the fact that ‘descriptive qualitative research design’ is a viable and acceptable research design (Doyle et al., 2020; Lambert & Lambert, 2012; Ulin et al., 2005). This design is an acceptable research design for robust scholarly research and has received varying degrees of acceptance within the academic community. In this study we use the descriptive qualitative research as a design in its own right. The most frequently proposed rationale for the use of a descriptive design is to provide straightforward descriptions of experiences and perceptions (Sandelowski, 2000), particularly in areas where little is known about the topic under study.

Doyle, L., McCabe, C., Keogh, B., Brady, A., & McCann, M. (2020). An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(5), 443-455.

Lambert, V. A., & Lambert, C. E. (2012). Qualitative descriptive research: An acceptable design. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 16(4), 255-256.

Ulin, PR, Robinson, ET, & Tolley, EE (2005). Qualitative methods in public health: A field guide for applied research. Jossey-Bass.

Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description?. Research in nursing & health. 2000;23(4):334-40.

Indicate under Data collection if field notes were collected or not as they are important to add to the context of the interviews.

We have explained that, “The interviewer (TMP) made field notes during the interview and then summarized these following the interview. The field notes were thereafter used to develop analytical memos.”.

Data analysis: Indicate (Line 209) that data was transcribed verbatim. This is only indicated in the Abstract (Line 39), but it is important to indicate this in the main document.

We have highlighted in the manuscript that data was transcribed verbatim. The sentence now reads, “The audio-recorded data was transcribed verbatim by the first author (TMP)”.

Results: Indicate the number of sub-themes in Line 229.

We have indicated the number of sub-themes. “The findings are organized into four main themes and ten sub-themes identified from the analysis of the data”.

Line 239 should say sub-themes, not themes. Clarify also 'four main subthemes arose

We have amended to read, “The following three sub-themes emerged from the interviews.”.

(Line 334). Is the word 'main' necessary?

We have removed the word.

The following concepts [many of the participants; several participants; most participants; a few of the participants] are not appropriate to report qualitative findings as they suggest numbers; appropriate concepts are some participates, other participants and others. Writing just 'participants' may also imply that it is all participants who shared that experience. I found both appropriate and inappropriate concepts in this manuscript and suggest that the inappropriate concepts be replaced.

Thank you for this comment. We have used the suggested qualifiers in some places where possible, but in some instances, we felt that some of the qualifiers we had used were the most appropriate way to convey the general experiences of the participants in relation to a particular phenomenon.

Line 311 should acknowledge that some participants had previous pregnancies and therefore knew what to expect.

We have amended this section to read, “One of the participants who had a previous pregnancy explained the difficulties of having a first pregnancy without adequate knowledge of the accompanying physical changes”.

Lines 319 - 321 and 330 - 331 appears to be misplaced; they would suit the Discussion section.

We have removed the sentence in line 319-321. In line 330-331 we have amended the sentence to show our interpretation of the participant’s experience. The sentence now reads, “The participant’s narrative highlights the challenges of poor nutritional intake during pregnancy”.

Context: It is important to mention if these pregnancies were planned or not, if participants disclosed their pregnancies to whoever they expected to give social support and whether they are still in a continuing and healthy relationships with the partner who impregnated them. Where (on-campus or off-campus) and with whom were participants staying? Lines 599, 606-607 are not clear regarding where participants were staying.

In the design and data collection of the study we did not specifically seek to explore information on the nature of the pregnancies (planned or unplanned); whether they were staying on-campus or off-campus; and with whom they were staying. However, some of this information emerged during the course of our interviews and hence it is reflected in some of the narratives. In instances where this information emerges we attempt to provide some context. Pregnancies were disclosed in all cases to significant others who were expected to offer social support and we have highlighted this in the manuscript.

Discussion: Lines 590 and 648-649 give an impression that types of social support were rated in this study. Rating is a quantitative concept.

The study sought to explore the social support needs of unmarried pregnant students in tertiary institutions during pregnancy and the puerperal period, and provide insight into the types of social support that were most important to them (primary source of support). However, we have revised the language such that it does not reflect quantitative concepts:

“Although a previous study reported on the importance of emotional support during pregnancy, it was not rated regarded as the most important type of support needed”.

“Partners’ instrumental and financial supports were also considered to be important sources of support”.

Lines 653-656 should say some African cultures because in some communities in South Africa, paying damages means admission that one has impregnated a woman by paying a fine and not a commitment to support the child financially (paying damages is a once-off payment).

Thank you for this correction. We have specified that: “In some African cultures, payment of damages is perceived as a form of acceptance of paternity. This process was perceived by the participants to give a form of dignity to her family and some assurance that the father was prepared to take care of the child”.

Recommendation: It is not clear on which findings are the recommendations on behaviour change programme (Line 688) and rights-based approach (Line 639) based.

In the manuscript we explain that the participants mentioned that some male partners were not usually willing to help them with tasks. Experiences of social stigma were also reported at public health facilities. Hence, to overcome some of these challenges’ interventions informed by behaviour change and rights-based approach are essential. We explain in the manuscript that:

“Absence or lack of emotional social support from significant others, particularly partners may exacerbate the stressors of pregnancy among students. Tertiary institutions should partner with established social initiatives offering services for men in the country to engage and mentor young men one-on-one and in groups about the importance of the father’s role in the child’s development and how to best support their partners to improve pregnancy outcomes, irrespective of relationship status. Culturally sensitive health promotion programmes targeted at ‘father inclusive’ practices and behaviour change communication programmes to stimulate social support may have positive changes in terms of the supportive role of partners”.

“Male involvement programmes can be integrated in ANC whereby services are restructured to accommodate male partners to ensure a sense of involvement and responsibility. However, for these programmes to work, the ANC environment should be user friendly for young women and their partners. A rights-based approach must be consistently adopted when delivering maternal healthcare. Training and on-going education should be prioritised for healthcare workers regarding the provision of positive, respectful and supportive non-judgmental antenatal and postnatal care to their clients irrespective of their age or marital status”.

Who are the 'antenatal health personnel' in Line 695?

We have amended the sentence and explained that: “Training and on-going education should be prioritised for healthcare workers regarding the provision of positive, respectful and supportive non-judgmental antenatal and postnatal care to their clients irrespective of their age or marital status.”

Reviewer #2: There is need to rephrase the topic to experiences of unmarried pregnant students on male partner social support to speak to the background of the study.

Thank you for this comment. We have revised the background to highlight that the main issue of concern is social support needs for unmarried pregnant students and not only male partner social support. While we acknowledge that male social support is one of the main themes that emerged in the findings, the focus of the study is social support in general. However, we have rephrased the topic to, “Perspectives about social support among unmarried pregnant university students in South Africa”.

On abstract the section of methods line 35, the candidates say perceptions there must be consistency in usage of words, what is explored are experiences.

We have rephrased to clearly highlight that the study is exploring perspectives about social support among unmarried pregnant students in a university setting and not experiences.

40-41 the results should be reported in line with the study aim which is pregnant women support needs and when it was needed the most.

We have revised this section to highlight the aim of the study which is, “to explore the perspectives of social support among unmarried students in a university setting during pregnancy and the puerperium; and the period when most support is needed”. The results are reported in line with this study aim.

Under line 150, it should be clear which research design under qualitative research approach was employed that informed the thematic content analysis.

We have rephrased in the manuscript and included “descriptive” qualitative research design. There are a number of researchers who believe and support the fact that ‘descriptive qualitative research design’ is a viable and acceptable research design (Doyle et al., 2020; Lambert & Lambert, 2012; Ulin et al., 2005). This design is an acceptable research design for robust scholarly research and has received varying degrees of acceptance within the academic community. In this study we use the descriptive qualitative research as a design in its own right. The most frequently proposed rationale for the use of a descriptive design is to provide straightforward descriptions of experiences and perceptions (Sandelowski, 2000), particularly in areas where little is known about the topic under study. In this type of design, data analysis “does not use a pre-existing set of rules that have been generated from the philosophical or epistemological stance of the discipline that created the specific qualitative research approach. Rather, qualitative descriptive research is purely data-derived in that codes are generated from the data in the course of the study” (Lambert & Lambert, 2012, p.256). Thus, we have further explained in the manuscript that. “As qualitative descriptive research is purely data-derived, we specifically employed an inductive approach to thematic analysis”.

Under 171 how many students were snowballed were in puerperal period.

Among the first group of students who were approached, all of them were pregnant. None of them were in the puerperal period. However, through snowball sampling we were able to identify these students who had recently given birth. Essentially, all of the participants in the puerperal period were recruited through snowball. In the manuscript we explain that: “The first author (TMP) initially approached three pregnant young students who stayed in the same residence as her. She (TMP) discussed about the study with those young pregnant students and requested them to identify and recommend other students who were pregnant or had recently given birth”.

Line 145 should specify the experiences from unmarried pregnant students are about "male social support".

We have explained earlier on that the study was not specifically focusing on “male partner support” but rather support needs of unmarried pregnant students. We have explained in the manuscript that, “Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore the perspectives about social support among unmarried pregnant students in a university setting”.

119-144 provides an impression that the social support explored is only from male partners. Line 147 emphasis the said point which contradicts the study topic.

We have revised this section and deleted some material which suggested that the social support explored is only from male partners.

On line 197 the interview indicates that the schedule elicited the support needs of pregnant students and the period when most support is needed. The results should be aligned to what the interview guide elicited

We have revised this section to include all the topics covered in the interview schedule. This section now reads, “The questions contained in the interview schedule included the socio-demographic variables of participants and their partners, the support needs of pregnant students, the period when most support is needed and types of male partner support needed”.

on line 149, the section on study objectives should be included.

We have included the objectives of the study:

1) To explore the social support needs of unmarried students in tertiary institutions during pregnancy and the puerperium.

2) To explore the period when most support is needed by unmarried students in tertiary institutions during pregnancy and the puerperium.

line 171-173, how many peripheral students were identified, only pregnant student are mentioned.

Among the first group of students who were approached none of them were in puerperal period and we only managed to gather these participants in the puerperal period through referral. We have explained that: “The first author (TMP) initially approached three pregnant young students who stayed in the same residence as her. She (TMP) discussed about the study with those young pregnant students and requested them to identify and recommend other students who were pregnant or had recently given birth”.

Under 189, what ethical codes were considered in this study and the study is sensitive in nature, how was the emotional risk addressed.

We explained that: “Data collection was carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and the participants could withdraw from the study at any point. Although the study was of a sensitive nature, we did not anticipate any negative effects on the participants. However, we had arranged counselling services for the participants if the need arises but none of the participants requested for these services”.

Line 205, What was used to record data and where was data stored.

We have explained that: “We used a digital audio voice recorder and the recordings were safely stored in a password protected computer”.

Under 226, I suggest authors remove the social support needs from the general social network. That is, the first section of social support needs can be deleted, and the results presents the social support needs from participants male partners and the period they needed the support in order to align with the strong assertions made in the background.

Thank you for this suggestion. We have revised the background to highlight that the study will explore social support needs of unmarried pregnant students and not primarily focus on the social support needs from participants male partners. We believe that removing the social support needs from the general social network will not do justice to the study as these are some of the main issues that were expressed by the participants.

558 most participants are undergraduates and what implications does this have to the present study. The socio-economic background of participants is something that could have been explored from the participants

We did not specifically seek to explore the influence of the socio-economic background of participants nor did we aim to understand the implications of the level of study on the experiences of the participants. We acknowledge that these aspects could have provided a different perspective and insight to the study’s findings. However, there are sections where we elaborate on the influence of the participants’ socio-economic background. For example, “The baby needs so many things so as to grow in a good state; nappies, warm clothes, milk, formula [baby food] since am not going to breastfeed so financially it will be much required from him. [She gives an example]-cause my cousin gave birth in April and the father of the baby hasn’t given her a single cent since she gave birth, since she fell pregnant, she hasn’t received any money from the baby’s daddy and telling me things are difficult, so financially it is so important”(pg. 20, line 438-443); “Lastly, financial support was needed to buy food, to cover transport costs and medical expenses and to prepare for the arrival of the unborn baby” (pg. 28, ;line 611-613).

What recommendations can be made to deal with students’ emotional risk that the lack of male partner support impose on unmarried pregnant students. Additionally, what strategies can be recommended to cultivate a culture of male social support towards their female pregnant partners.

Thank you for highlighting these issues. As part of the recommendations we have added that, “In instances where emotional support from their male partners is not feasible, unmarried pregnant students need to identify alternate sources of support such as counselling support, friends, church and social media”.

“Tertiary institutions should partner with established social initiatives offering services for men in the country to engage and mentor young men one-on-one and in groups about the importance of the father’s role in the child’s development and how to best support their partners to improve pregnancy outcomes, irrespective of relationship status. Culturally sensitive health promotion programmes targeted at ‘father inclusive’ practices and behaviour change communication programmes to stimulate social support may have positive changes in terms of the supportive role of partners. Implementors of such programmes should consider adopting innovative outreach strategies that appeal to young men’s interests and hang-out spots, such as bars and sports arenas”.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Tara Tancred

6 Mar 2023

PONE-D-22-16990R1Perspectives about social support among unmarried pregnant university students in South AfricaPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Akintola,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Many thanks to the authors for this revised manuscript. This is a really impressive piece of work for a master's study--really well done! I think it is reading a lot more clearly now. I have made a number of comments in the text directly (please see your manuscript attached). Many are typographical edits, but some pertain to the contents.

Additionally, there are a some overarching areas that I would like to see revised:

- The introductory section seems to assume that all university students who get pregnant are not married, likely in an unstable relationship with their partner, and that the pregnancy is unintended. This is not always going to be the case, so you may want to caveat this as “unmarried women with unintended pregnancies”, for example. At the very least, there needs to be a bit more nuance here, acknowledging that women get pregnant under different circumstances, including for women in university.

- It would also be important to briefly mention the legality of abortion—you note that many students choose to terminate their pregnancies, but this is of course only likely/safe where abortion is, so if you could add a sentence about abortion within the South African context, that would be helpful. Although it is legal, I imagine it still carries certain stigma (and potentially different access barriers, making it an unavailable service for all women), so there may be women who are likely to continue with their pregnancy, even though they may prefer to terminate. In which case implications for social support are likely different when the pregnancy, though unintended, is not wanted, versus where it is wanted. As you note in your results, social supports like partner support mediate this (and the decision to terminate, if that is an option).

- I would ask that you broadly streamline the introduction, as there is quite a bit of repetition (social stigma, relationship with partner, etc. are raised multiple times).

- In your methods, please given an indication of the types of questions that were asked.

- Also, it would be useful to add if you inevitably sampled until theoretical saturation had been reached, which would suggest an added level of rigour.

- Would it be possible to add to Table 2 if students were undergraduate or graduate students? As it’s clear you did recruit graduate students from the initial three, the breakdown by years seems to suggest only undergraduate students, which is confusing. It’s quite different to be a second year undergraduate versus a second year PhD student, for example. I think this would be an important detail that may affect their experience (especially given the very different demands at the undergraduate and postgraduate levels).

- I am not clear on how many themes you have! You say three, but then you have a theme about timing, and then about male support (which has its own sub-themes, I’m assuming the health system one is a sub-theme for this?)—so I’d say five? Please clarify.

- Please ensure the information about the participant giving each quotation is consistent (e.g. sometimes it’s age, sometimes it’s pregnancy/postpartum status, sometimes it’s educational level).

- Also ensure that all quotations in your results have a period at the end—I’d recommend inside of the quotation and before the information about the participant, as that is more grammatically correct.

- Where something was not consistently expressed and may be a divergent viewpoint, please make that clear. For example, you quoted one of your participants who was going to have a small baby, which you write as though nutritional challenges were consistent across your participants, but her experience is quite uncommon (for a baby to be small for gestational age to that extent, and especially due to nutrition—she would have had to be quite malnourished for this to be the case as the fetus will take what it needs and generally do well, as long as the maternal nutrition status was okay prior to pregnancy—if it was really poor, she’d likely not be menstruating and ovulating at all).

- For the timing query: I’d call these sub-themes, but I’d be clear about indicating an overarching theme, which, based on your results, seems to be something like, “timing of concentrated support in pregnancy varies depending on the participants’ circumstances”.

- In your discussion, it’d be very interesting to see a reflection on why you feel appraisal support didn’t emerge.

- You have some nice recommendations—it would also be useful to see some suggested areas for further research.

- It would also be important to see a brief reflection on some of the strengths and limitations of your study, specifically your methodological approach, within the discussion. Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 20 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Tara Tancred, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors responded appropriately to reviewers' comments and the manuscript adds value to qualitative research

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Sogo France Matlala

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-22-16990_R1_editor comments.pdf

PLoS One. 2023 Apr 24;18(4):e0284906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284906.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


30 Mar 2023

#1: The introductory section seems to assume that all university students who get pregnant are not married, likely in an unstable relationship with their partner, and that the pregnancy is unintended. This is not always going to be the case, so you may want to caveat this as “unmarried women with unintended pregnancies”, for example. At the very least, there needs to be a bit more nuance here, acknowledging that women get pregnant under different circumstances, including for women in university.

Thank you for this comment. We have revised part of the introduction to indicate this caveat that the study focuses on unmarried women with unintended pregnancies. We have included literature that points to the high probability of unmarried university students having unintended pregnancies. We have explained in the manuscript that: “Although social support is of great value for all mothers during pregnancy, certain groups of women are especially vulnerable during pregnancy, and these include adolescents, unmarried women, students and women of low socio-economic status [7]. Because of the risky sexual behavior among students, young women in institutions of higher learning have a high risk of unintended pregnancy [8], particularly among unmarried students [9-11]”.

#2: It would also be important to briefly mention the legality of abortion—you note that many students choose to terminate their pregnancies, but this is of course only likely/safe where abortion is, so if you could add a sentence about abortion within the South African context, that would be helpful. Although it is legal, I imagine it still carries certain stigma (and potentially different access barriers, making it an unavailable service for all women), so there may be women who are likely to continue with their pregnancy, even though they may prefer to terminate. In which case implications for social support are likely different when the pregnancy, though unintended, is not wanted, versus where it is wanted. As you note in your results, social supports like partner support mediate this (and the decision to terminate, if that is an option).

We do agree that abortion may be associated with some stigma. We briefly describe the legality of abortion in the South African context. We explain that, “While some students may choose to terminate their unplanned pregnancies as a legal right stipulated under the Choice in Termination of Pregnancy Act in South Africa [12], abortion is often publicly condemned and associated with negative and judgmental attitudes from health care providers and the community [13, 14]. Students that choose to keep their unplanned pregnancies remain in need of a supportive environment that favours their physical and psychological wellbeing”.

#3: I would ask that you broadly streamline the introduction, as there is quite a bit of repetition (social stigma, relationship with partner, etc. are raised multiple times).

We have revised the introduction and removed some material which was repetitive.

#4: In your methods, please given an indication of the types of questions that were asked.

We had broadly included the themes from where the interview questions were drawn. Additionally, we included a few examples of the questions that comprised the interview schedule. In the manuscript we have added that: Some of the interview questions posed to participants include: “Describe some of the challenges you face in your pregnancy? As a pregnant student?”; “At what stage of pregnancy do you feel you need the most support from significant others? Why and from who?”; and “From the support needs you have already mentioned, which ones do you feel are the most important to you? Why?”.

#5: Also, it would be useful to add if you inevitably sampled until theoretical saturation had been reached, which would suggest an added level of rigour.

In the analysis section of the manuscript we have explained that, “Although 16 interviews already indicated a point of saturation in which no new codes were identified, we decided to continue analysis of the remaining interviews to ensure the confidence and verification of data saturation”.

#6: Would it be possible to add to Table 2 if students were undergraduate or graduate students? As it’s clear you did recruit graduate students from the initial three, the breakdown by years seems to suggest only undergraduate students, which is confusing. It’s quite different to be a second year undergraduate versus a second year PhD student, for example. I think this would be an important detail that may affect their experience (especially given the very different demands at the undergraduate and postgraduate levels).

Thank you for this suggestion. We have made the level of study of participants clearer by adding to the table that all 1st, 2nd and 3rd year participants were undergraduates. Only those who were doing an honours degree were post-graduates (or graduate) students.

#7: I am not clear on how many themes you have! You say three, but then you have a theme about timing, and then about male support (which has its own sub-themes, I’m assuming the health system one is a sub-theme for this?)—so I’d say five? Please clarify.

We explain in the findings that, “The findings are organized into four main themes and ten sub-themes identified from the analysis of the data. The four main themes are: Support needs of unmarried pregnant students; period when the most support is needed; male partner support required; and health systems role on social support”.

For clarity, we have listed the themes and sub-themes below:

Support needs of unmarried pregnant students: emotional support; instrumental support; informational support

Period when the most support is needed: at the beginning of pregnancy; throughout pregnancy; towards the end of pregnancy; support post delivery

Male partner support required: partner’s emotional support; partner’s instrumental support; partner’s financial support

Health systems role on social support

#8: Please ensure the information about the participant giving each quotation is consistent (e.g. sometimes it’s age, sometimes it’s pregnancy/postpartum status, sometimes it’s educational level).

We have provided the pregnancy and postpartum status of all participants and for those who have a previous pregnancy we include this detail for context. We also include the educational level of participants broadly as undergraduate or post-graduate.

#9: Also ensure that all quotations in your results have a period at the end—I’d recommend inside of the quotation and before the information about the participant, as that is more grammatically correct.

We have gone through the results and ensured that all quotations have a period at the end.

#10: Where something was not consistently expressed and may be a divergent viewpoint, please make that clear. For example, you quoted one of your participants who was going to have a small baby, which you write as though nutritional challenges were consistent across your participants, but her experience is quite uncommon (for a baby to be small for gestational age to that extent, and especially due to nutrition—she would have had to be quite malnourished for this to be the case as the fetus will take what it needs and generally do well, as long as the maternal nutrition status was okay prior to pregnancy—if it was really poor, she’d likely not be menstruating and ovulating at all).

Thank you for this comment. We have made it clear that the issue of nutritional challenges was unique. In the manuscript we have revised to read, “In a unique case, one of the participants was at risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes as she lacked adequate information on proper nutrition practices as illustrated below”.

#11: For the timing query: I’d call these sub-themes, but I’d be clear about indicating an overarching theme, which, based on your results, seems to be something like, “timing of concentrated support in pregnancy varies depending on the participants’ circumstances”.

The editor’s earlier comment was about the need to make the themes and sub-themes clear, which we have done. We do believe that the present themes and sub-themes we use correctly capture the essence of the study findings. With regards to this specific theme we had named it “Period when the most support is needed”, with the following sub-themes: at the beginning of pregnancy; throughout pregnancy; towards the end of pregnancy; and support post-delivery.

#12: In your discussion, it’d be very interesting to see a reflection on why you feel appraisal support didn’t emerge.

Thank you for this suggestion. We have added in the discussion that, “However, appraisal support did not emerge as an important source of social support in this study and this could be because most of the participants were still pregnant and felt they did not need evaluative feedback. Yet, this form of support could have been of great value to them after delivery as they engage in motherhood duties such as feeding and bathing the infant”.

#13: You have some nice recommendations—it would also be useful to see some suggested areas for further research.

Thank you for this suggestion. We added suggested areas for further research, “Future studies should include different racial groups to capture the experiences of pregnant students of all races and also include married and unmarried students to compare and contrast their needs.”

#14: It would also be important to see a brief reflection on some of the strengths and limitations of your study, specifically your methodological approach, within the discussion.

Thank you for this suggestion. We added the strengths and limitations of the study:

“To our knowledge, this is the first study to present a rich description of the perspectives about social support needs and the period when most support is needed by unmarried pregnant university students in South Africa. We also sampled until data saturation to ensure that a sufficient quantity and quality data was collected. However, the snowball method of sampling that was used meant that the initial participants, who were indigenous African students, recommended other pregnant students in their social network, who were also indigenous African students. As a result, potential participants from other racial groups did not participate in this study. Therefore, the findings could be biased and be a representation of experiences and perceptions of pregnant indigenous African students. Also, the findings of this study apply only to pregnant students who are unmarried and does not apply to those pregnant students who are in a marriage or engaged to be married. Future studies should include different racial groups to capture the experiences of pregnant students of all races and also include married and unmarried students to compare and contrast their support needs”.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 2

Tara Tancred

12 Apr 2023

Perspectives about social support among unmarried pregnant university students in South Africa

PONE-D-22-16990R2

Dear Dr. Akintola,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Tara Tancred, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Happy to see this manuscript accepted. Thank you to the authors for their hard work in getting it to this stage. I think this will make a useful contribution to literature.

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Tara Tancred

14 Apr 2023

PONE-D-22-16990R2

Perspectives about social support among unmarried pregnant university students in South Africa

Dear Dr. Akintola:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Tara Tancred

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Minimal underlying data.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-22-16990_R1_editor comments.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES