Abstract
Study 1 examined the reliability of the ratings assigned to the performance of five sign-and-symptom items drawn from tests of motor impairment in Parkinson's disease. Patients with Parkinson's disease of varying severity performed gait, rising from chair, and hand function items. Video recordings of these performances were rated by a large sample of experienced and inexperienced neurologists and by psychology undergraduates, using a four point scale. Inter-rater reliability was moderately high, being higher for gait than hand function items. Clinical experience proved to have no systematic effect on ratings or their reliability. The idiosyncrasy of particular performances was a major source of unreliable ratings. Study 2 examined the intercorrelation of several standard rating scales, comprised of sign-and-symptom items as well as activities of daily living. The correlation between scales was high, ranging from 0.70 to 0.83, despite considerable differences in item composition. Inter-item correlations showed that the internal cohesion of the tests was high, especially for the self-care scale. Regression analysis showed that the relationship between the scales could be efficiently captured by a small selection of test items, allowing the construction of a much briefer test.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Brown R. G., MacCarthy B., Jahanshahi M., Marsden C. D. Accuracy of self-reported disability in patients with parkinsonism. Arch Neurol. 1989 Sep;46(9):955–959. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1989.00520450025014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CANTER G. J., DE LA TORRE R., MIER M. A method for evaluating disability in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1961 Aug;133:143–147. doi: 10.1097/00005053-196108000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diamond S. G., Markham C. H. Evaluating the evaluations: or how to weigh the scales of parkinsonian disability. Neurology. 1983 Aug;33(8):1098–1099. doi: 10.1212/wnl.33.8.1098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feinstein A. R., Josephy B. R., Wells C. K. Scientific and clinical problems in indexes of functional disability. Ann Intern Med. 1986 Sep;105(3):413–420. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-105-3-413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ginanneschi A., Degl'Innocenti F., Magnolfi S., Maurello M. T., Catarzi L., Marini P., Amaducci L. Evaluation of Parkinson's disease: reliability of three rating scales. Neuroepidemiology. 1988;7(1):38–41. doi: 10.1159/000110159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kennard C., Munro A. J., Park D. M. The reliability of clinical assessment of Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984 Mar;47(3):322–323. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.47.3.322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marsden C. D., Schachter M. Assessment of extrapyramidal disorders. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1981 Feb;11(2):129–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1981.tb01118.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reynolds N. C., Jr, Montgomery G. K. Factor analysis of Parkinson's impairment. An evaluation of the final common pathway. Arch Neurol. 1987 Oct;44(10):1013–1016. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1987.00520220019009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Webster D. D. Critical analysis of the disability in Parkinson's disease. Mod Treat. 1968 Mar;5(2):257–282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]