Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Genetics logoLink to Journal of Medical Genetics
. 1991 Sep;28(9):605–608. doi: 10.1136/jmg.28.9.605

Do familial neural tube defects breed true?

E Drainer 1, H M May 1, J L Tolmie 1
PMCID: PMC1015790  PMID: 1956058

Abstract

The tendency for sibs affected by non-syndromal neural tube defect (NTD) to have the same type of lesion was assessed retrospectively in a series of 66 affected sibships from the west of Scotland. Different schemes were used to classify the lesions: in the simplest classification into either anencephaly (including anencephaly-spina bifida) or spina bifida there was a tendency for spina bifida to breed true. More detailed description of the NTD in 48 sibships permitted classification according to location on the neuraxis; in this scheme sibs had dissimilar lesions. In 48 sets of affected sibs the lesions were separable into high NTD, which had involvement above vertebral level T12, and low NTD, which did not extend above T12. Low lesions comprised a minority of the total and each one occurred in a sibship with a high lesion. These results do not support the idea that NTDs occurring above and below vertebral level T12 have a different genetic basis.

Full text

PDF
606

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cowchock S., Ainbender E., Prescott G., Crandall B., Lau L., Heller R., Muir W. A., Kloza E., Feigelson M., Mennuti M. The recurrence risk for neural tube defects in the United States: a collaborative study. Am J Med Genet. 1980;5(3):309–314. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320050314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ferguson-Smith M. A. The reduction of anencephalic and spina bifida births by maternal serum alphafetoprotein screening. Br Med Bull. 1983 Oct;39(4):365–372. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a071849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Frecker M. F., Fraser F. C., Heneghan W. D. Are 'upper' and 'lower' neural tube defects aetiologically different? J Med Genet. 1988 Jul;25(7):503–504. doi: 10.1136/jmg.25.7.503-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hall J. G., Friedman J. M., Kenna B. A., Popkin J., Jawanda M., Arnold W. Clinical, genetic, and epidemiological factors in neural tube defects. Am J Hum Genet. 1988 Dec;43(6):827–837. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McBride M. L. Sib risk of anencephaly and spina bifida in British Columbia. Am J Med Genet. 1979;3(4):377–387. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320030409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Seller M. J. Neural tube defects and sex ratios. Am J Med Genet. 1987 Mar;26(3):699–707. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320260325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Seller M. J. Neural tube defects: are neurulation and canalization forms causally distinct? Am J Med Genet. 1990 Mar;35(3):394–396. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320350316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Seller M. J. Unanswered questions on neural tube defects. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1987 Jan 3;294(6563):1–2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6563.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Toriello H. V., Higgins J. V. Possible causal heterogeneity in spina bifida cystica. Am J Med Genet. 1985 May;21(1):13–20. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320210103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Genetics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES