Abstract
Background
Congenital Zika virus (ZIKV) infection can result in birth defects, including malformations in the fetal brain and visual system. There are two distinct genetic lineages of ZIKV: African and Asian. Asian-lineage ZIKVs have been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in humans; however, recent evidence from experimental models suggests that African-lineage viruses can also be vertically transmitted and cause fetal harm.
Methodology/Principal findings
To evaluate the pathway of vertical transmission of African-lineage ZIKV, we inoculated nine pregnant rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) subcutaneously with 44 plaque-forming units of a ZIKV strain from Senegal, (ZIKV-DAK). Dams were inoculated either at gestational day 30 or 45. Following maternal inoculation, pregnancies were surgically terminated seven or 14 days later and fetal and maternal-fetal interface tissues were collected and evaluated. Infection in the dams was evaluated via plasma viremia and neutralizing antibody titers pre- and post- ZIKV inoculation. All dams became productively infected and developed strong neutralizing antibody responses. ZIKV RNA was detected in maternal-fetal interface tissues (placenta, decidua, and fetal membranes) by RT-qPCR and in situ hybridization. In situ hybridization detected ZIKV predominantly in the decidua and revealed that the fetal membranes may play a role in ZIKV vertical transmission. Infectious ZIKV was detected in the amniotic fluid of three pregnancies and one fetus had ZIKV RNA detected in multiple tissues. No significant pathology was observed in any fetus; and ZIKV did not have a substantial effect on the placenta.
Conclusions/Significance
This study demonstrates that a very low dose of African-lineage ZIKV can be vertically transmitted to the macaque fetus during pregnancy. The low inoculating dose used in this study suggests a low minimal infectious dose for rhesus macaques. Vertical transmission with a low dose in macaques further supports the high epidemic potential of African ZIKV strains.
Introduction
Zika virus (ZIKV) is a flavivirus that is primarily transmitted by Aedes spp. mosquitoes [1]. ZIKV was initially discovered in Uganda in 1947 in a sentinel rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) [2]. ZIKV has since spread from the African continent to Asia, the Pacific, and the Americas [3]. Two distinct genetic lineages of ZIKV have been identified, African-lineage and Asian-lineage. Asian-lineage virus spread from Asia to the Pacific where it was detected in 2007 [3] and was introduced to Brazil between 2013 and 2014 [4]. The introduction of ZIKV in Brazil led to an outbreak in 2015 [4]. During this outbreak, ZIKV was first causally connected to birth defects and other adverse pregnancy outcomes [5].
In utero ZIKV exposure is associated with malformations in the fetal brain and visual system, along with fetal demise and pregnancy loss [6–12]. Of the two distinct genetic lineages of ZIKV, only Asian-lineage ZIKV is currently associated with congenital infection in humans [13]. Recently, African-lineage ZIKV has been reportedly detected in Brazil [Preprints 14, 15], however these data have yet to be published. The potential novel detection of African-lineage ZIKV outside the African continent demonstrates the possibility of a new outbreak and underscores the need to further evaluate the threat that African-lineage ZIKV poses to pregnant people.
Congenital birth defects or adverse pregnancy outcomes have not been formally associated with African-lineage ZIKV infection during pregnancy in people. However, in vivo studies done in mice and macaques suggest that African-lineage ZIKV could pose a substantial risk when infection occurs during pregnancy [16–19]. African-lineage infection in pregnant immune-deficient mice revealed the potential for vertical transmission during pregnancy [16, 17]. In contrast to Asian-lineage ZIKV, African-lineage ZIKV infection in pregnant mice is more likely to cause fetal demise than birth defects [16, 17]. Aubry et al. reported higher rates of fetal reabsorption in mouse pregnancies infected with African-lineage ZIKV, whereas infection with Asian-lineage resulted in varying capacities to cause fetal harm including fetal brain abnormalities as well as fetal death/resorption [16, 20].
The rhesus macaque model accurately reflects many key aspects of ZIKV infection during human pregnancy, thus making it a highly translatable model. Previous macaque studies have offered unique insights into the potential of African ZIKV infection to cause fetal harm during pregnancy [18, 19, 21]. These studies have all used the same low-passage African-lineage ZIKV strain from Senegal (ZIKV-DAK) yet have used a range of inoculation doses and routes, and gestational timing of infection. Crooks et al. found that a subcutaneous maternal inoculation of 1 x 104 plaque forming units (PFU) at gestation day (gd) 45 resulted in a higher viral burden in the placenta than the same dose of an Asian-lineage virus [18], but did not find any evidence of vertical transmission at term. Newman et al. showed that maternal vaginal inoculation with 3 x 108 PFU at gd 30 resulted in vertical transmission and fetal loss in two of three pregnancies [19]. Raasch et al. demonstrated that a maternal subcutaneous dose of 1 x 108 PFU at gd 45 resulted in vertical transmission and fetal demise in three out of eight pregnancies [21]. The Crooks et al. and Raasch et al. studies suggest that vertical transmission may be dose-dependent. However, these studies evaluated the fetuses/neonates and maternal-fetal interface (MFI) tissues either when fetal death was detected or at gestational term, more than 15 weeks after maternal ZIKV inoculation.
Collectively, these data underscore the potential of African-lineage ZIKV to adversely affect the fetus in utero. To further evaluate the pathway of vertical transmission of African-lineage ZIKV from the mother to the fetus, we inoculated nine pregnant rhesus macaques with a relatively low dose of 44 PFU of ZIKV-DAK and terminated the pregnancies within two weeks post-inoculation. This design allows us to capture the early stages of infection in the MFI and vertical transmission and evaluate their vulnerability to African-lineage ZIKV. Furthermore, assessing the fetuses within two weeks of maternal ZIKV inoculation allowed us to investigate viral burden and pathology in the fetuses before fetal loss is likely to occur. This unconventional inoculation dose was the result of a dilution error, and since all dams became infected and developed viremia, this error was not detected before a total of nine animals were infected. Although our experimental design was not fully intentional, we believe these results are important and illuminating. We found that this low dose of African-lineage ZIKV is capable of infecting macaques and causing vertical transmission. This study indicates a low minimal infectious dose for this strain of African-lineage ZIKV in rhesus macaques and may suggest a high epidemic potential of African ZIKV strains.
Materials and methods
Experimental design
A total of nine pregnant female rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) were subcutaneously inoculated with 44 PFU of a Senegal isolate of African-lineage Zika virus ZIKV/Aedes africanus/SEN/DAK-AR-41524/1984 (ZIKV-DAK), Genbank accession number KY348860, during early pregnancy. This inoculation dose occurred due to an error in calculating the dilution factor for the viral inoculum due to an incorrect assumption that the stock of virus being used had a much higher titer. This dilution error occurred at the beginning of the study and was propagated over the set of animals reported here, thus this series of animals received a lower viral dose than was originally intended.
Five dams were infected at approximately gd 30, two of these pregnancies were terminated seven days post-infection (dpi), and three were terminated 14 dpi. Four dams were infected 15 days later in pregnancy, at approximately gd 45 followed by pregnancy termination at 14 dpi. When the dilution error was discovered, we did not continue to inoculate dams with 44 PFU/mL, thus the resulting study has uneven numbers in each group. A total of seven pregnancies terminated between gd 37 and gd 61 were used for controls for histological evaluation. Dams with control pregnancies were inoculated with saline and subjected to the same experimental regimen as the ZIKV infected pregnancies. Details on the timing of ZIKV/saline inoculation and pregnancy termination are provided in S1 Table.
Ethics
The rhesus macaques used in this study were cared for by the staff at the Wisconsin National Primate Research Center (WNPRC) according to regulations and guidelines of the University of Wisconsin Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, which approved this study protocol (G005691) in accordance with recommendations of the Weatherall report and according to the principles described in the National Research Council’s Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. All animals were housed in enclosures with at least 4.3, 6.0, or 8.0 sq. ft. of floor space, measuring 30, 32, or 36 inches high, and containing a tubular PVC or stainless steel perch. Each individual enclosure was equipped with a horizontal or vertical sliding door, an automatic water lixit, and a stainless steel feed hopper. All animals were fed using a nutritional plan based on recommendations published by the National Research Council. Twice daily, macaques were fed a fixed formula, extruded dry diet (2050 Teklad Global 20% Protein Primate Diet) with adequate carbohydrate, energy, fat, fiber (10%), mineral, protein, and vitamin content. Dry diets were supplemented with fruits, vegetables, and other edible foods (e.g., nuts, cereals, seed mixtures, yogurt, peanut butter, popcorn, marshmallows, etc.) to provide variety to the diet and to inspire species-specific behaviors such as foraging. To further promote psychological well-being, animals were provided with food enrichment, human-to-monkey interaction, structural enrichment, and manipulanda. Environmental enrichment objects were selected to minimize chances of pathogen transmission from one animal to another and from animals to care staff. While on study, all animals were evaluated by trained animal care staff at least twice daily for signs of pain, distress, and illness by observing appetite, stool quality, activity level, and physical condition. Animals exhibiting abnormal presentation for any of these clinical parameters were provided appropriate care by attending veterinarians.
Care & use of macaques
The female macaques described in this report were co-housed with a compatible male and observed daily for menses and breeding. Pregnancy was detected by abdominal ultrasound, and gestational age was estimated as previously described [22].
For physical examinations, virus inoculations, and blood collections, dams were anesthetized with an intramuscular dose of ketamine (10 mg/kg). Dams that were euthanized were first anesthetized with an intramuscular dose of ketamine (at least 15 mg/kg) followed by an intravenous overdose (greater than or equal to 50 mg/kg or to effect) of sodium pentobarbital. Blood samples from the femoral or saphenous vein were obtained using a vacutainer system or needle and syringe. Pregnant macaques were monitored daily prior to and after inoculation for any clinical signs of infection (e.g., diarrhea, inappetence, inactivity, and atypical behaviors) and general well-being.
Viral inoculate preparation and PFU calculation
Nine pregnant dams were inoculated subcutaneously with 44 PFU of ZIKV/Aedes africanus/SEN/DAK-AR-41524/1984 (ZIKV-DAK). This virus was originally isolated from Aedes africanus mosquitoes with a round of amplification on Aedes pseudocutellaris cells, followed by amplification on C6/36 cells and two rounds of amplification on Vero cells. ZIKV-DAK was obtained from BEI Resources (Manassas, VA). The stock of ZIKV-DAK was evaluated using plaque assay on Vero cells as previously described [18]. The original titer of the viral stock was determined to be 3.2 x 106 PFU/mL.
All dams were inoculated with a 1:7.3 x 104 dilution of the viral stock, prepared in an identical fashion. Based on this dilution factor, we calculate that the animals received a dose of 44 PFU. After the dilution error was discovered, we thawed another vial of the virus stock and repeated plaque assays using the same method as described above, and determined the titer to be 3.4 x 106 PFU/mL, a value highly similar to the original titer. This finding indicates that viral infectivity was stable over time in cryostorage and supports the conclusion that the animals studied here received a calculated dose of ranging from 43.84–46.58 PFU.
The dilution of the viral stock in sterile PBS was done in two steps. First, a vial of the stock frozen at 3.2 x 106 PFU/mL was thawed. After thawing, 1.36 x 10−2 mL of the virus stock (4.352 x 104 PFU in 13.6 μL) was added to 9.986 mL of 1X PBS creating a 10 mL solution of 4.352 x 103 PFU/ 1mL. Next, 1.0 x 10−1 mL of the diluted stock created in step one was added to 9.9 mL of PBS resulting in a 10mL solution with a titer 4.354 x 101 PFU/mL. 1mL of that the final diluted stock (43.54 PFU/1mL) was loaded into a syringe and kept on ice until inoculation. The stock was diluted in this manner because it was incorrectly believed by those preparing the stock that the titer of the frozen viral stock was 7.3 x 108 PFU/mL rather than 3.2 x 106.
Inoculation and monitoring
Animals were anesthetized as described above, and 1 mL of the inoculum (43.54 PFU/1mL) described in the previous subsection was delivered subcutaneously over the cranial dorsum. Animals were monitored closely following inoculation for any signs of an adverse reaction. Seven pregnant dams served as controls and were inoculated subcutaneously with 1mL of sterile PBS, using the same procedure as described above. All control animals were subjected to the same sedation and blood collection schedule as the ZIKV inoculated animals.
Pregnancy termination and tissue collection
A total of 16 dams had their pregnancies surgically terminated and products of conception collected at gd 36–63 via uterotomy. This procedure was terminal for three dams, 45/14-4, 30/14-1 and 30/14/-C1, per IACUC protocol specifications unrelated to viral infection and thus plasma viremia and PRNT data points are not provided for 45/14-4 and 30/14-1 beyond 14 dpi. During the uterotomy procedure, the entire conceptus (fetus, placenta, fetal membranes, umbilical cord, and amniotic fluid) was removed. The tissues for all animals were dissected using sterile instruments which were changed between each organ/tissue to minimize possible cross-contamination. Each organ/tissue was evaluated grossly in situ, removed with sterile instruments, placed in a sterile culture dish, and dissected for histology, viral burden assay, or banked for future assays. Samples of the MFI included two full-thickness center-cut sections of the primary and secondary placental discs containing decidua basalis and chorionic plate, these center cuts were approximately 5–10 mm wide depending on the size of the placenta. Biopsy samples were collected for RT-qPCR evaluation including: decidua basalis dissected from the maternal surface of the placenta, chorionic plate dissected away from the placental disc, amniotic membrane, chorionic membrane, placental bed (the uterine placental attachment site containing deep decidua basalis and uterine myometrium), and biopsies from the body of the placenta. To assess viral burden via RT-qPCR three placental biopsies were taken of approximately 3–5 mm in width were taken from each placental disc: one near the placental margin, one midway between the margin and the center, and one near the center of the placenta. Placental biopsies were taken after the decidual basalis was removed; however histological evaluation of the samples taken in the same manner in subsequent studies reveal that there are often portions of the trophoblastic shell on these placental samples. Additional samples from the placenta, decidua, chorionic plate, and fetal membranes (amnion and chorion) were also collected for future assays. Fetal tissues and fluids collected for viral burden assay, or banked for future assays included; cerebral spinal fluid (CSF), fetal brain with or without skull, eye, heart or fetal chest, fetal limb containing muscle and skin, liver, kidney, and spleen. The remaining fetal tissues were preserved for histological evaluation. CSF was collected from the cisterna magna at the atlanto-occiptal joint with a 27 gauge needle and syringe, volumes ranged from 0.2 to 1.5 mL. To collect umbilical cord blood the cord was held with forceps, transected, and the cut end of the cord was placed in a blood collection tube, collecting 20–100 μL of blood. The extraembryonic celoemic fluid was not recovered during the collection of amniotic fluid (typically between 1–6 mL).
Viral RNA isolation from blood, tissues, and other fluids
RNA was isolated from maternal and fetal plasma, CSF, and amniotic fluid using the Viral Total Nucleic Acid Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI) on a Maxwell 48 RSC instrument (Promega, Madison, WI) as previously reported [23]. Fetal and maternal tissues were processed with RNAlater (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. RNA was recovered from tissue samples using a modification of a previously described method [24]. Briefly, up to 200 mg of tissue was disrupted in TRIzol (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) with 2 x 5 mm stainless steel beads using a TissueLyser (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) for 3 minutes at 25 r/s for 2 cycles. Following homogenization, samples in TRIzol were separated using Bromo-chloro-propanol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). The aqueous phase was collected, and glycogen was added as a carrier. The samples were washed in isopropanol and ethanol precipitated. RNA was re-suspended in 5 mM Tris pH 8.0 and stored at -80°C.
Quantitative reverse transcriptase (RT-qPCR)
ZIKV RNA was isolated from both fluid and tissue samples as previously described [17]. Viral RNA was then quantified using a highly sensitive RT-qPCR assay based on the one developed by Lanciotti et al. [25], though the primers were modified with degenerate bases at select sites to accommodate African-lineage Zika viruses. RNA was reverse-transcribed and amplified using the TaqMan Fast Virus 1-Step Master Mix RT-qPCR kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) on the LightCycler 480 or LC96 instrument (Roche, Indianapolis, IN), and quantified by interpolation onto a standard curve made up of serial tenfold dilutions of in vitro transcribed RNA. RNA for this standard curve was transcribed from a plasmid containing an 800 bp region of the Zika virus genome that is targeted by the RT-qPCR assay. The final reaction mixtures contained 150 ng random primers (Promega, Madison, WI), 600 nM each primer and 100 nM probe. Primer and probe sequences are as follows: forward primer: 5’- CGYTGCCCAACACAAGG-3’, reverse primer: 5′-CCACYAAYGTTCTTTTGCABACAT-3′ and probe: 5′-6-carboxyfluorescein-AGCCTACCTTGAYAAGCARTCAGACACYCAA. The limit of detection for fluids (plasma, amniotic fluid, CSF) with this assay is 150 copies/ml. The theoretical limit of detection for the tissues is 3 copies/mg [18].
Plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT)
Macaque serum samples were assessed for ZIKV neutralizing antibodies utilizing a plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT). Endpoint titrations of reactive sera, utilizing a 90% cutoff (PRNT90), were performed as previously described [26] against ZIKV/Aedes africanus/SEN/DAK-AR-41524/1984 (ZIKV-DAK). Briefly, ZIKV was mixed with serial 2-fold dilutions of serum for 1 hour at 37°C before being added to Vero cells, and neutralization curves were generated using GraphPad Prism software (La Jolla, CA). The resulting data were analyzed by nonlinear regression to estimate the dilution of serum required to inhibit both 90% and 50% of infection.
Viral quantification by plaque assay
Amniotic fluid samples from 30/14-1, 30/7-2, 45/14-4, and 30/14-3 were evaluated for infectious ZIKV by plaque assay. These samples were selected based on RT-qPCR results showing a high level of ZIKV RNA. Titrations for replication competent virus quantification of amniotic fluid was completed by plaque assay on Vero cell cultures as described previously [27]. Vero cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (CCL-81). Duplicate wells were infected with 0.1 mL of aliquots from serial 10-fold dilutions in growth media and virus was adsorbed for 1h. Following incubation, the inoculum was removed, and cell monolayers were overlaid with 3 mL containing a 1:1 mixture of 1.2% oxoid agar and DMEM (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with 10% (vol/vol) FBS and 2% (vol/vol) penicillin/streptomycin. Cells were incubated at 37˚C in 5% CO2 for 2 days for plaque development. Cell monolayers were then stained with 3 mL of overlay containing a 1:1 mixture of 1.2% oxoid agar and DMEM with 2% (vol/vol) FBS, 2% (vol/vol) penicillin/streptomycin and 0.33% neutral red (Gibco). Cells were incubated overnight at 37˚C and plaques were counted. Limit of detection for the plaque assay is 0.7 log10 PFU/mL.
Histology
To assess general pathology, tissues were fixed in 4% PFA, routinely processed, and embedded in paraffin. Paraffin sections (5 μm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or used for in situ hybridization (ISH). Histological evaluation of fetal tissue was done by a board-certified veterinary pathologist (HAS, AM) blinded to the ZIKV RNA results. Histologic examination of placental sections was performed by an experienced placental pathologist (TKM) who was blinded to ZIKV RNA results and pregnancy treatment, but was informed of the gestational age at the time of collection to properly date villous maturation. Uteroplacental histologic sections were scored for the presence or absence of leukocytoclastic decidual spiral artery vasculitis, patchy decidual necrosis (excluding fibrinoid layer between anchoring villi and maternal decidua), chorionic villous infarctions (acute or chronic), and villous stromal calcifications. Photomicrographs were taken using brightfield on the Nikon eclipse Ti2 (Nikon Instruments Inc., Melville, NY, USA) using NIS-Elements AR software version 5.02.006 (Nikon Instruments Inc., Melville, NY, USA). Scale bars were added using NIS-Elements AR and photomicrographs were white balanced using Adobe Photoshop 2020 version 21.10 (Adobe Inc, San Jose, CA, USA).
Detection of ZIKV RNA using in situ hybridization (ISH)
ISH was conducted as previously described [22]. The ISH probes against the Zika virus genome were purchased commercially (Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Cat No. 468361, Newark, California, USA). Tissues/structures were determined to be negative when ZIKV RNA was undetectable by RNAscope ISH, including instances when only a single focus of staining was observed. Tissues/structures were determined to be positive for ZIKV RNA as detectable by RNAscope ISH when there was clear staining across a tissue/structure; any positive signal that was limited to a single cell-sized focus of indeterminate histological appearance (granular “specks” of positive signal) was interpreted as non-specific staining. Uninfected tissue sections served as negative controls. An example of the negative control and as well as examples of non-specific staining can be seen in S1 Fig.
Detection of ZIKV replication using multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization (mFISH)
Multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization (mFISH) was performed using the RNAscope® Fluorescent Multiplex Kit (Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Newark, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with modifications. Twenty ZZ probe pairs with C1 channel (green, Cat# 463781) targeting ZIKV positive sense RNA and forty ZZ probe pairs with C3 channel (red, Cat# 467911) targeting ZIKV negative sense RNA are synthesized by Advanced Cell Diagnostics. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections were deparaffinized using xylene and hydrated through a series of ethanol washes. These tissue sections were further heated in the antigen retrieval buffer and digested by proteinase. Sections were exposed to ISH target probes and incubated at 40°C in a hybridization oven for two hours. After rinsing, ISH signal was amplified using company-provided Pre-amplifier and Amplifier conjugated to fluorescent dye. Sections were counterstained with 4’, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), mounted, and stored at 4°C until image analysis. FISH images were captured on an LSM 880 Confocal Microscope with Airyscan (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and processed using open-source ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Uninfected tissue sections served as negative controls.
Immunohistochemistry
CD56, CD68, and CD31 stained tissues sections were immunostained using the Benchmark XT autostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA) using provided pre-diluted antibodies CD56, CD68, and CD31 (Ventana Medical Systems). For cytokeratin and CD163 staining immunostaining, sections were deparaffinized, incubated in 3% hydrogen peroxide for 15 min, and subjected to a heat induced antigen retrieval protocol (10 mM citric acid at 110°C for 15 min). Sections were immunohistochemically stained using a proprietary polymer-based peroxidase staining method (Biocare Medical, Concord, CA): sections were blocked 20 min in Background Punisher (Biocare Medical) and incubated in 1:100 mouse anti-cytokeratin CAM5.2 monoclonal antibody (item 452M-94, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) or 1:1000 anti-CD163 monoclonal antibody (Novus Biologicals, Centennial, CO. Ref NB110-40686) overnight at 4 degrees. Slides were processed for bound antibody detection by incubation in full-strength MACH2 Polymer-horseradish peroxidase conjugate (Biocare Medical) for 20 min and developed with Betazoid DAB chromogen (Biocare Medical) for 1.5 min. All washes were in 0.1 M Tris pH 7.5 with Tween-20 at room temperature.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analysis was conducted using Graphpad Prism 9 for macOS version 9.3.1 software. Unpaired Student’s t-test was used to determine significant differences in the timing of peak viremia, and viral burden at peak viremia. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the presence or absence of decidual vasculitis in mock vs ZIKV-DAK placentas. Fisher’s exact test was also used to evaluate the presence or absence of decidual necrosis in mock vs ZIKV-DAK placentas.
Results
Low-dose ZIKV-DAK inoculation resulted in productive infection and neutralizing antibody responses in all dams
A total of nine pregnant rhesus macaques were subcutaneously inoculated with a Senegalese isolate of African-lineage ZIKV during early pregnancy (Fig 1), when the fetus is at greatest risk of congenital ZIKV infection and associated birth defects [7, 9, 11, 28, 29]. Five dams were infected at approximately gd 30 and four dams at approximately gd 45. Blood was collected from the dams prior to infection, during the first two weeks after inoculation, and intermittently until up to 87 dpi. All dams received a dose of 44 PFU; although this dose was not intentionally chosen, all dams became productively infected and developed neutralizing antibody responses. Physical examinations of infected dams found no ZIKV-associated symptoms reported in human infections such as rash or conjunctivitis following inoculation. This finding is consistent with previous reported studies of ZIKV-DAK infection in rhesus macaques [21].
All dams developed plasma viremia: seven animals resolved viremia between 10 and 16 dpi, and two dams had positive plasma viremia at 14 dpi when they were euthanized (Fig 2). Peak plasma viremia levels were between 5 x 104 and 2.65 x 107 ZIKV RNA copies/mL and peaked between 6 and 11 dpi. By comparing these results to a previous report that inoculated pregnant rhesus macaques with a larger dose (104 PFU) of the same ZIKV isolate at gd 45 [18], we see that the animals given 44 PFU had a significant delay (p = 0.0150) in time to peak plasma viremia (S2A Fig), but reached a similar peak level of virus in the blood (S2B Fig).
To determine if infection with 44 PFU ZIKV was sufficient to induce neutralizing antibody (nAb) responses, we measured nAb titers in the serum prior to infection and at approximately 14 or 28 dpi. All animals had robust titers of nAb at approximately 14 or 28 dpi (Fig 3): the titers of nAb induced by inoculation with 44 PFU are not significantly different from those induced by challenge with 104 PFU [18] (S3 Fig). One animal, 45/14-1, had low titers of nAb prior to infection (S4 Fig). 45/14-1 was not exposed to ZIKV or any other flavivirus prior to this study. It is not clear why she had antibodies that were neutralizing prior to ZIKV-DAK inoculation. However, we believe her data are still comparable to the other ZIKV naive dams in this study. Her PRNT90 titer at 0 dpi was only ~1:4, which is well below the threshold of what is considered in the field to be diagnostic of prior ZIKV infection [30]. Thus, we cannot robustly conclude that the neutralization response at 0 dpi is “ZIKV-specific” [31]. Furthermore, this animal developed viral load kinetics similar to other animals included in the study (Fig 2) and we observed a greater than four-fold rise in PRNT90 titers from 0 to 28 dpi.
ZIKV-DAK was consistently detected in maternal-fetal interface tissues shortly after maternal inoculation
To assess the presence of ZIKV in the MFI we surgically terminated the pregnancies shortly after maternal inoculation. Two pregnancies were terminated at 7 dpi and seven pregnancies were terminated 14 dpi. Tissues and fluids from the MFI were evaluated for ZIKV RNA using RT-qPCR and ISH. Biopsies from the dam’s spleen, liver, and mesenteric lymph node were collected at the time of surgery. ZIKV RNA was found in at least one of the biopsied tissues for all but one dam (30/7-2) (S5A Fig).
Collectively, ISH and RT-qPCR results show that the MFI was consistently infected with ZIKV, with virus present in the placenta, decidua basalis, amniotic membrane and chorionic membrane (Fig 4). Details on viral burden in MFI tissues are shown in S5B Fig. ZIKV burden in MFI tissues from all three experimental groups were similar (S5C Fig). ISH demonstrated that infection in the placenta was mainly confined to the trophoblastic shell and the chorionic plate. Scanned images of the positive ISH results can be found Dryad Digital Repository (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.931zcrjpg). ZIKV RNA was detected within placental villi in only one pregnancy (Fig 4C). Additionally, ISH evaluation showed that the decidua basalis and trophoblastic shell were the most frequently infected MFI tissue (Fig 4C). Random sampling bias may explain discrepancies between the RT-qPCR and ISH results in the decidua basalis, chorionic plate, and amniotic and chorionic membranes. Furthermore, ISH evaluation suggests that infection at this stage is often focal or in multiple small foci and not widespread throughout the tissues.
Maternal inoculation with 44 PFU of ZIKV-DAK is sufficient to cause vertical transmission
In this study, we defined vertical transmission as the presence of infectious virus in the amniotic fluid. To determine the capacity of a maternal inoculation of 44 PFU to achieve vertical transmission, we evaluated the amniotic fluid with RT-qPCR and then further assessed positive samples with a plaque assay. We found infectious ZIKV in three cases three (45/14-4, 30/14-1, 30/7-2) (Fig 5A), thus confirming vertical transmission in these cases. Additionally, ZIKV RNA was detected in the umbilical cord tissue in two cases and the umbilical cord blood in two cases (Fig 4B, S5D Fig), but we were unable to confirm that the ZIKV RNA found represented a replicating virus. In one case with vertical transmission, 45/14-4, ZIKV RNA was detected in multiple fetal tissues (Figs 4B and 5B). and in 30/7-2 ZIKV RNA was detected in the fetal CSF (Figs 4B and 5B). We were unable to confirm that RNA detected in the fetal tissues of 45/14-4 represented replicating virus, due to the absence of negative-sense ZIKV RNA as determined using mFISH. Although no replicating virus was detected in this fetus, the presence of infectious virus in the amniotic fluid confirms that ZIKV-DAK was vertically transmitted to the fetus. Maternal inoculation with 44 PFU at gd 30 versus gd 45 appeared to have no impact on the capacity for vertical transmission. Furthermore, pregnancies that were allowed to progress to 14 dpi compared to 7 dpi also did not demonstrate an increased likelihood of vertical transmission. Collectively, these data show that maternal inoculation of 44 PFU of ZIKV-DAK is sufficient to cause vertical transmission as early as 7 dpi.
ZIKV-DAK may vertically transmit through the fetal membranes
To understand the pathway of vertical transmission, we used ISH to evaluate the cellular location of ZIKV RNA in histological specimens from cases that had infectious virus in the amniotic fluid (30/7-2, 30/14-1, and 45/14-4). For 30/7-2 and 30/14-1, ISH was performed on full-thickness placental center cuts taken from the primary and secondary placental discs which included decidua basalis, trophoblastic shell, placental villi, and chorionic plate with large fetal vessels. In both cases, ZIKV RNA was detected in the decidua basalis and trophoblast shell but not in the placental villi or chorionic plate (Fig 4C). Unfortunately, we were not able to obtain a high-quality histological specimen of either of the amniotic or chorionic membrane from these two cases to properly evaluate the presence of ZIKV RNA.
In the case of 45/14-4, where we have the most apparent evidence of vertical transmission to the fetus (Fig 4), ISH was performed on a full-thickness placental center cut. This pregnancy had a single disc placenta, an occurrence that happens in approximately 20% of rhesus macaque pregnancies [32, 33]. ISH evaluation of the placental center-cut showed ZIKV RNA in two large villi, one near the trophoblastic shell (Fig 6A and 6B) and the other near the chorionic plate (Fig 6C–6F). In both villi, the staining is located predominantly in the villous mesenchyme, and not in the outer syncytiotrophoblast (STB) layer that is directly exposed to maternal blood. Immunohistochemical staining of serial sections of this specimen suggested that ZIKV RNA in the villous near the trophoblastic shell (Fig 6A) may be associated with either macrophages or trophoblasts (S7A, S7B Fig), while the ZIKV RNA in the large villous near the chorionic plate (Fig 6E) localized with cytokeratin-positive trophoblasts (S7E Fig). Additionally, ZIKV RNA was detected sporadically in the chorionic plate surrounding large fetal blood vessels (Fig 6G and 6H).
For 45/14-4, we obtained a high-quality sample of the fused fetal membranes (membranes were not fused in the other eight ZIKV-exposed pregnancies). The fetal membranes consist of two components: the outer chorionic membrane, which is continuous with the chorionic plate of the placenta, and the amniotic membrane, the inner membrane that is closest to the fetus and is in contact with amniotic fluid (Fig 4A). While ZIKV was not detected by RT-qPCR, ISH revealed the abundant presence of ZIKV RNA in the fetal membranes (Fig 6I–6L). By comparing the ISH section to an H&E-stained serial section, we see that the ZIKV RNA is mainly detected in the chorionic membrane of the fetal membranes, with relatively fewer areas where ZIKV RNA is detected in the amniotic membrane (Fig 6I–6L). We confirmed that the ZIKV RNA in the fetal membranes represented replicating virus using mFISH that detects ZIKV replicative intermediates (S6 Fig). Immunohistochemical staining for the macrophage marker CD163 suggests that at least some of the cells with ZIKV RNA may be macrophages (S8 Fig). The relatively abundant presence of ZIKV RNA within the chorionic membrane and the chorionic plate suggests that ZIKV may gain access to the fetus through the chorionic membrane.
ZIKV-DAK infection has no substantial effect on the placenta
To determine the effect of ZIKV-DAK on the development of the fetus, we conducted histological evaluations of the placenta and the fetus and compared our findings to gestational-age-matched controls. Histological evaluation of the placenta was performed by a board-certified pathologist who specializes in human placental pathology; this pathologist was only informed of the gestational age and remained blinded to all ZIKV RNA results and pregnancy treatment. The majority of the findings within an animal were either present or absent in both placental discs. Therefore, histopathological findings for the primary and secondary discs have been reported together (Table 1). The histological findings broken down by disc as well as placental weights and dimensions are provided in S2 Table.
Table 1. Histopathological evaluation of MFI tissue sections.
Group | Treatment | Pregnancy | Gestational age (days) | Chronic deciduitis | Villitis | Maternal leukocy-toclastic decidual vasculitis | Maternal decidual necrosis | Acute villous infarction | Villous calcification |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30/7 | mock | 30/7-C1 | 37 | No | No | No | No | No | No |
ZIKV-DAK 7 dpi | 30/7-1 | 38 | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | |
30/7-2 | 36 | No | No | No | No | No | No | ||
30/14 | mock | 30/14-C1 | 44 | No | No | No | No | No | No |
30/14-C2 | 45 | No | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | ||
30/14-C3 | 45 | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | ||
ZIKV-DAK 14 dpi | 30/14-1 | 43 | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | |
30/14-2 | 43 | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | ||
30/14-3 | 45 | No | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | ||
45/14 | mock | 45/14-C1 | 58 | Yes | No | No | No | No | No |
45/14-C2 | 60 | No | No | No | No | No | No | ||
45/14-C3 | 61 | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | ||
ZIKV-DAK 14 dpi | 45/14-1 | 61 | No | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | |
45/14-2 | 60 | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | ||
45/14-3 | 59 | No | No | No | No | No | No | ||
45/14-4 | 63 | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | ||
Instances in mock | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |||
Instances in ZIKV-DAK | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | |||
Total instances | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
Several of the pathologies that were found in the ZIKV specimens were also found in control specimens, suggesting that the majority of these lesions are not the result of ZIKV infection. We did see more instances of decidual necrosis in ZIKV cases compared to controls (Table 1), however this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.3077). Decidual necrosis was seen in one out of the seven control cases and in four out the nine ZIKV cases. The decidual necrosis observed was focal. Additionally, decidual leukocytoclastic vasculitis was observed in the spiral arteries in three out of the nine ZIKV cases but not in any of the control cases, however this observed difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.2125). We found that decidual vasculitis was associated with the ZIKV RNA within decidual vessels. We observed more patchy nodular decidual necrosis in ZIKV cases (4/9) compared with controls (1/7) (Table 1), but there were areas of decidual necrosis in controls that make this feature less specific than vasculitis. IHC staining for endothelial cell marker CD31 suggests that the ZIKV RNA is within the endothelial cells in these vessels (S9E Fig). We also found that necrosis of anchoring villi in case 45/14-2 correlated with ZIKV infected macrophages (S10 Fig). Collectively, the histopathological evaluation of the placentas from control and ZIKV-exposed pregnancies suggest that ZIKV infection did not have any substantial effect on the placenta.
Importantly, we also found ZIKV RNA within decidual spiral arteries in case 30/7-2 (Fig 7). To determine what cell types ZIKV RNA was detected in, we performed IHC to identify extravillous trophoblasts (EVTs), endothelial cells, and macrophages (Fig 7E). IHC staining for CD56 revealed that endovascular EVTs were among the cell types that appeared to be infected with ZIKV. This finding is important because endovascular EVTs play an essential role in spiral artery remodeling [34, 35] and as seen in case 30/7-2 EVTs form “plugs” in early pregnancy that impact uteroplacental blood flow [36].
Histological evaluation of the fetus was performed by board-certified veterinary pathologists who were blinded to all RNA results. Eight out of the nine fetuses had no significant histologic lesions when compared to controls. The fetus with multiple ZIKV positive tissues, 45/14-4, had evidence of mild acute hemorrhage in the lung, but this lesion was presumed to be perimortem. Overall, there was no significant pathology in any of the ZIKV exposed fetuses. However, because all nine fetuses were terminated within 14 days of maternal inoculation, we are unable to evaluate what the effects of ZIKV infection in the fetal compartment might have been if the pregnancies had continued.
Discussion
In this study, we inoculated nine pregnant rhesus macaques with 44 PFU of ZIKV-DAK early in pregnancy at either gd 30 or gd 45 with surgical pregnancy termination at 7 or 14 dpi. All dams became productively infected and developed strong neutralizing antibody responses. Evaluation of the MFI revealed ZIKV RNA in MFI tissues in all pregnancies. Three pregnancies also had infectious ZIKV in the amniotic fluid. One case had ZIKV RNA detected in multiple tissues in the fetus proper. ISH evaluation of MFI tissues showed that the decidua basalis was frequently infected and that the fetal membranes may play a role in ZIKV vertical transmission. No significant histologic pathology in the fetuses or the placenta was found. This study demonstrates that African-lineage ZIKV, like Asian-lineage ZIKV, can be vertically transmitted to the macaque fetus during pregnancy.
Low-dose inoculation
Productive infection in all dams with inoculation of 44 PFU of ZIKV-DAK suggests maternal infection can occur with a relatively low inoculation dose in macaques. Furthermore, it demonstrates that maternal inoculation with a low dose can achieve vertical transmission, and that vertical transmission with African-lineage ZIKV is not simply a function of a higher dose inoculum as suggested by the comparison of two previously published studies [18, 21]. Vertical transmission was seen in the Raasch et al. study with an inoculation dose of 1 x 108 PFU [21], but not seen in the Crooks et al. study with an inoculation dose of 1 x 104 PFU (pregnancies evaluated at term). Styer et al. determined that West Nile virus-infected mosquitoes, when feeding on a live host, inoculate with a dose ranging from as low as approximately 5 PFU to as high as 106.6 PFU, with a median dose ranging from 103.4–10 6.1 PFU depending on mosquito species [37]. Hence, 44 PFU is within the possible range of doses administered by a bite from an infected mosquito, but is likely far from a representative median dose. The low-dose inoculation used in this study suggests a low minimum infectious dose for rhesus macaques and may indicate a high epidemic potential of African ZIKV strains. Although the 44-PFU dose in the current study was unintentional, it has provided novel insight into permissiveness to ZIKV infection in pregnant macaques and risk factors for vertical transmission.
When comparing our data to a study by Crooks et al. [18] in which pregnant rhesus macaques were inoculated with 104 PFU of ZIKV-DAK, we found that although our dams had a statistically significant delay (2.5 days) in the timing of peak viremia, viral RNA reached similar levels in the blood [18]. Additionally, the neutralizing antibody responses observed in the present study were similar to those reported by Crooks et al. [18]. These data suggest that infection with approximately 200 times less infectious virus did not drastically alter the maternal infection dynamics. However, we cannot determine the long-term impact of the inoculation dose on the fetus since pregnancies in this study were terminated within 14 dpi. Additionally, because of the novel nature of this study, we do not know if a comparably low dose inoculation in other animal models would result in in similar viral dynamics as it did in rhesus macaques. Thus, it is possible that the response to an inoculation with 44 PFU of ZIKV-DAK is a species-specific response.
Vertical transmission
The current study suggests that this African-lineage ZIKV isolate, like Asian-lineage ZIKV, can be vertically transmitted to the fetus during pregnancy. ZIKV was vertically transmitted in three pregnancies, as evident by infectious virus in the amniotic fluid. The amniotic fluid is absorbed by the embryo/early fetus prior to skin keratinization [39], thus the embryo/early fetus has no barrier protecting it from infectious ZIKV in the amniotic fluid. Later in gestation the fetus also swallows amniotic fluid [38], this would be another way that ZIKV in the amniotic fluid can infect the fetus, however the fetuses in the current study have not yet developed the ability to swallow.
ZIKV RNA was also found in the fetus in two of those three pregnancies. Although the current study used a very small inoculation dose, our results are consistent with two other non-human primate studies that show that maternal infection with African-lineage ZIKV results in MFI infection and vertical transmission to the fetus [18, 19]. Consistent with the Crooks et al study [18], we did not observe any instances of fetal death or any fetal pathology. However, we did find evidence of vertical transmission in 3/9 pregnancies and pathology in the decidua. Two out of the three pregnancies that had vertical transmission were inoculated at gd 30, this is consistent with previously published studies demonstrating that ZIKV inoculation at gd 30 results in a high rate of vertical transmission compared to inoculation at gd 45 [39]. We saw vertical transmission in one of the cases inoculated at gd 45, this is somewhat unexpected as the Crooks study found that ZIKV-DAK inoculation at gd 34 with approximately 200 times more virus did not result in vertical transmission [18]. However, the pregnancies in Crooks study were evaluated 110–115 dpi, and evaluation of the fetus and MFI at 14 dpi in the current study likely improved our chances of detecting vertical transmission and histopathology that may have resolved if the pregnancies were allowed to continue to full term.
In our most apparent case of ZIKV vertical transmission to the fetus (45/14-4), we detected infectious virus in the amniotic fluid and ZIKV RNA in multiple fetal tissues. Focal presence of ZIKV was observed in placental villi, whereas widespread infection was observed in the fetal membranes. This case was the only one where we observed ZIKV in the placental villi by ISH. The morphological evaluation suggests that ZIKV RNA is not present in the outer STB layer but may be in villous macrophages and other cytotrophoblast cells. This pattern of ZIKV in the placenta fits the pattern reported in other in vivo studies that found ZIKV infection in the chorionic plate and in the placental villous mesenchyme, but not in the STB layer [18, 19, 40]. Importantly, ZIKV RNA was found in a large portion of the fetal membranes in this case, specifically within the chorionic membranes. These data suggest that the fetal membranes may act as a ZIKV reservoir and potentially as a route for vertical transmission; however, the broad significance of this observation remains unclear and unfortunately both fetal membranes (amniotic and chorionic) were not collected for the majority of cases. In the other two cases with infectious ZIKV in the amniotic fluid the amniotic membrane was not collected, and we did not detect ZIKV in the chorionic membrane. We note that in future studies, a more thorough sampling of all components of the MFI in is needed.
Impact of ZIKV-DAK on fetal development and pregnancy outcomes
Studies in mice suggest that congenital infection with African-lineage ZIKV is more likely to cause fetal demise while Asian-lineage is more likely to cause congenital defects [16, 17]. We did not observe any cases of fetal demise, nor did we see any significant pathology in any of the fetuses. However, our study design (low-dose inoculum and early pregnancy termination) may not be ideal for studying adverse fetal outcomes such as fetal loss. Furthermore, the lack of fetal pathology hindered our ability to discern whether maternal inoculation at gd 30 versus gd 45 differentially affected the fetus.
We were able to observe ZIKV RNA within trophoblasts located within the lumina of maternal decidual spiral arteries. As far as we are aware, this is the first observation of ZIKV infection of endovascular trophoblasts in situ in decidual spiral arteries. Newman et al. reported persistent muscularization in spiral arteries in the decidua of a near-term rhesus macaque pregnancy vaginally challenged with ZIKV-DAK [19]. The importance of the remodeling of these vessels for the establishment of a successful pregnancy [41, 42] provides potential insight into the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes with early pregnancy maternal ZIKV infection [7, 9].
Congenital birth defects or adverse pregnancy outcomes have not been formally associated with African-lineage ZIKV infection during pregnancy in people. However, African-lineage ZIKV is still considered and monitored as an emerging threat to public health [43]. Like Asian-lineage ZIKV, adverse pregnancy outcomes in people may only be detected when African strains of ZIKV emerge in a ZIKV-naive population. Recently, African-lineage has been reportedly found in Brazil, highlighting the risk of this virus to emerge outside the African continent [Preprints 14, 15]. African-lineage ZIKV has been shown to cause fetal demise in in vivo studies done in mice and macaques [17, 19], further supporting the potential of African-lineage ZIKV to cause adverse pregnancy outcomes in humans. The current study is in agreement with those findings.
In conclusion, this study demonstrates that African-lineage ZIKV, like Asian-lineage ZIKV, can be vertically transmitted from mother to fetus in the macaque model. It will be instructive to compare the localization of ZIKV at the MFI and in the fetus in these acute low-dose inoculations with parallel time point collections in pregnant rhesus monkeys receiving higher doses of ZIKV. Understanding how ZIKV compromises the “placental fortress” [44] will help map the pathway to vertical transmission of ZIKV. Understanding the pathway of ZIKV vertical transmission may better prepare researchers and clinicians for future viral outbreaks that may pose a risk for the health of the mother and developing fetus.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank the WNPRC Veterinary, Scientific Protocol Implementation, and Pathology Service Unit staff for assistance with animal procedures, including breeding, monitoring, surgery, and necropsy. We thank the University of Wisconsin Translational Research Initiatives in Pathology (TRIP) Laboratory, supported by the UW Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UWCCC (P30 CA014520) and the Office of Research Infrastructure Programs- NIH (S10 OD023526) for use of its facilities and services. Logan Keding created the illustration of the rhesus macaque conceptus shown in Fig 4A. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or U.S. Army.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. Additional data can be found on Dryad (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.931zcrjpg).
Funding Statement
Funding for this project came from National Institute of General Medical Sciences grant T32 GM135119 to Michelle R. Koenig, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases R01 AI132519 to Thaddeus G. Golos, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases R01 AI132563 to Thomas C. Friedrich and Matthew T. Aliota, and NIH Office of the Director grant P51 OD011106 to the Wisconsin National Primate Research Center. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Musso D, Gubler DJ. Zika virus. Clin Microbiol Rev 2016;29:487–524. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00072-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dick GWA. Zika Virus (I). Isolations and serological specificity. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1952;46:509–20. 10.1016/0035-9203(52)90042-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hayes EB, EB H, Hayes EB. Zika virus outside Africa. Emerg Infect Dis 2009;15:1347–50. doi: 10.3201/eid1509.090442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Metsky HC, Matranga CB, Wohl S, Schaffner SF, Freije CA, Winnicki SM, et al. Zika virus evolution and spread in the Americas. Nature 2017;546:411–5. doi: 10.1038/nature22402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.CDC. CDC concludes Zika causes microcephaly and other birth defects. CDC Newsroom; 2016. https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2016/s0413-zika-microcephaly.html (accessed May 3, 2021). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Costello A, Dua T, Duran P, Gülmezoglu M, Oladapo OT, Perea W, et al. Defining the syndrome associated with congenital Zika virus infection. Bull World Health Organ 2016;94:406–406A. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.176990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Honein MA, Dawson AL, Petersen EE, Jones AM, Lee EH, Yazdy MM, et al. Birth defects among fetuses and infants of US women with evidence of possible zika virus infection during pregnancy. JAMA—J Am Med Assoc 2017;317:59–68. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hoen B, Schaub B, Funk AL, Ardillon V, Boullard M, Cabié A, et al. Pregnancy Outcomes after ZIKV Infection in French Territories in the Americas. N Engl J Med 2018;378:985–94. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709481 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lima GP, Rozenbaum D, Pimentel C, Frota ACC, Vivacqua D, Machado ES, et al. Factors associated with the development of Congenital Zika Syndrome: A case-control study. BMC Infect Dis 2019;19:1–6. 10.1186/s12879-019-3908-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bhatnagar J, Rabeneck DB, Martines RB, Reagan-Steiner S, Ermias Y, Estetter LBC, et al. Zika virus RNA replication and persistence in brain and placental tissue. Emerg Infect Dis 2017;23:405–14. doi: 10.3201/eid2303.161499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Brasil P, Pereira JP, Moreira ME, Nogueira RMR, Damasceno L, Wakimoto M, et al. Zika virus infection in pregnant women in rio de janeiro. N Engl J Med 2016;375:2321–34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Martines RB, Bhatnagar J, de Oliveira Ramos AM, Davi HPF, Iglezias SDA, Kanamura CT, et al. Pathology of congenital Zika syndrome in Brazil: a case series. Lancet 2016;388:898–904. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30883-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Beaver JT, Lelutiu N, Habib R, Skountzou I. Evolution of two major Zika virus lineages: Implications for pathology, immune response, and vaccine development. Front Immunol 2018;9:1–17. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rodrigues De Almeida P, Ehlers LP, Demoliner M, Karolina A, Eisen A, Girardi V, et al. Detection of a novel African-lineage-like Zika virus naturally infecting free-living neotropical primates in Southern Brazil. BioRxiv 2019:828871. 10.1101/828871. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Alencar J, Ferreira De Mello C, Marcondes CB, Guimarães AÉ, Toma HK, Queiroz Bastos A, et al. Natural infection and vertical transmission of two flaviviruses (Yellow fever and Zika) in mosquitoes in primary forests in the Brazilian state of Rio de Janeiro (Diptera: Culicidae). BioRxiv 2019:688713. 10.1101/688713. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Aubry F, Jacobs S, Darmuzey M, Lequime S, Delang L, Fontaine A, et al. Recent African strains of Zika virus display higher transmissibility and fetal pathogenicity than Asian strains. Nat Commun 2021;12:1–14. 10.1038/s41467-021-21199-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jaeger AS, Murrieta RA, Goren LR, Crooks CM, Moriarty R V., Weiler AM, et al. Zika viruses of African and Asian lineages cause fetal harm in a mouse model of vertical transmission. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2019;13:e0007343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Crooks CM, Weiler AM, Rybarczyk SL, Bliss M, Jaeger AS, Murphy ME, et al. African-Lineage Zika Virus Replication Dynamics and Maternal-Fetal Interface Infection in Pregnant Rhesus Macaques. J Virol 2021;95:2220–40. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02220-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Newman CM, Tarantal AF, Martinez ML, Simmons HA, Morgan TK, Zeng X, et al. Early Embryonic Loss Following Intravaginal Zika Virus Challenge in Rhesus Macaques. Front Immunol 2021;12:1. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.686437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bohm EK, Vangorder-Braid JT, Jaeger AS, Moriarty R V., Baczenas JJ, Bennett NC, et al. Zika Virus Infection of Pregnant Ifnar1 −/− Mice Triggers Strain-Specific Differences in Fetal Outcomes. J Virol 2021;95. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00818-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Raasch LE, Yamamoto K, Newman CM, Rosinski JR, Shepherd PM, Razo E, et al. Fetal loss in pregnant rhesus macaques infected with high-dose African-lineage Zika virus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2022;16:e0010623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mohr EL, Block LN, Newman CM, Stewart LM, Koenig M, Semler M, et al. Ocular and uteroplacental pathology in a macaque pregnancy with congenital Zika virus infection. PLoS One 2018;13:e0190617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190617 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dudley DM, Aliota MT, Mohr EL, Weiler AM, Lehrer-Brey G, Weisgrau KL, et al. A rhesus macaque model of Asian-lineage Zika virus infection. Nat Commun 2016;7:1–9. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hansen SG, Jr MP, Ventura AB, Hughes CM, Gilbride RM, Ford JC, et al. Immune clearance of highly pathogenic SIV infection. Nature 2013;502:100–4. doi: 10.1038/nature12519 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lanciotti RS, Kosoy OL, Laven JJ, Velez JO, Lambert AJ, Johnson AJ, et al. Genetic and Serologic Properties of Zika Virus Associated with an Epidemic, Yap State, Micronesia, 2007. Emerg Infect Dis 2008;14:1232. doi: 10.3201/eid1408.080287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lindsey HS, Calisher CH, Mathews JH. Serum dilution neutralization test for California group virus identification and serology. J Clin Microbiol 1976;4:503–10. doi: 10.1128/jcm.4.6.503-510.1976 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nguyen SM, Antony KM, Dudley DM, Kohn S, Simmons HA, Wolfe B, et al. Highly efficient maternal-fetal Zika virus transmission in pregnant rhesus macaques. PLoS Pathog 2017;13:1–22. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.El Costa H, Gouilly J, Mansuy JM, Chen Q, Levy C, Cartron G, et al. ZIKA virus reveals broad tissue and cell tropism during the first trimester of pregnancy. Sci Rep 2016;6:1–9. 10.1038/srep35296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shapiro-Mendoza CK, Rice ME, Galang RR, Fulton AC, VanMaldeghem K, Prado MV, et al. Pregnancy Outcomes After Maternal Zika Virus Infection During Pregnancy—U.S. Territories, January 1, 2016–April 25, 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017;66:615–21. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6623e1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Duffy MR, Chen T-H, Hancock WT, Powers AM, Kool JL, Lanciotti RS, et al. Zika Virus Outbreak on Yap Island, Federated States of Micronesia. N Engl J Med 2009;360:2536–43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805715 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Roehrig JT, Hombach J, Barrett ADT. Guidelines for Plaque-Reduction Neutralization Testing of Human Antibodies to Dengue Viruses 2008;21:123–32. 10.1089/VIM.2008.0007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Digiacomo RF, Shaughnessy PW, Tomlin SL. Fetal-placental weight relationships in the rhesus (Macaca mulatta). Biol Reprod 1978;18:749–53. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod18.5.749 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chez RA, Schlesselman JJ, Salazar H, Fox R. Single placentas in the rhesus monkey. J Med Primatol 1972;1:230–40. doi: 10.1159/000460389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Moffett A, Loke C. Immunology of placentation in eutherian mammals. Nat Rev Immunol 2006;6:584–94. doi: 10.1038/nri1897 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lash GE, Bulmer JN. Do uterine natural killer (uNK) cells contribute to female reproductive disorders? J Reprod Immunol 2011;88:156–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2011.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Roberts VHJ, Morgan TK, Bednarek P, Morita M, Burton GJ, Lo JO, et al. Early first trimester uteroplacental flow and the progressive disintegration of spiral artery plugs: new insights from contrast-enhanced ultrasound and tissue histopathology. Hum Reprod 2017;32:2382–93. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Styer LM, Kent KA, Albright RG, Bennett CJ, Kramer LD, Bernard KA. Mosquitoes inoculate high doses of West Nile virus as they probe and feed on live hosts. PLoS Pathog 2007;3:1262–70. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Glibert WM, Moore TR, Brace RA. Amniotic fluid volume dynamics. Fetal Matern Med Rev 1991;3:89–104. 10.1017/S0965539500000486. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rosinski JR, Raasch LE, Tiburcio PB, Breitbach ME, Shepherd PM, Yamamoto K, et al. Frequent first-trimester pregnancy loss in rhesus macaques infected with African-lineage Zika virus. Forthcoming in PLOS Pathogens. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Udenze D, Trus I, Berube N, Gerdts V, Karniychuk U. The African strain of Zika virus causes more severe in utero infection than Asian strain in a porcine fetal transmission model. Emerg Microbes Infect 2019;8:1098–107. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2019.1644967 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Burton GJ, Charnock-Jones DS, Jauniaux E. Regulation of vascular growth and function in the human placenta. Reproduction 2009;138:895–902. doi: 10.1530/REP-09-0092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jensen OE, Chernyavsky IL. Blood Flow and Transport in the Human Placenta. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2019;51:25–47. 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.WHO. Zika epidemiology update—February 2022. 2022.
- 44.Robbins JR, Bakardjiev AI. Pathogens and the placental fortress. Curr Opin Microbiol 2012;15:36–43. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2011.11.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. Additional data can be found on Dryad (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.931zcrjpg).