Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Medical Genetics logoLink to Journal of Medical Genetics
. 1993 Oct;30(10):849–851. doi: 10.1136/jmg.30.10.849

Upper and lower neural tube defects: an alternate hypothesis.

B H Garabedian 1, F C Fraser 1
PMCID: PMC1016568  PMID: 8230161

Abstract

It has been suggested that neural tube defects (NTDs) of the upper type (anencephaly, encephalocele, and thoracic spina bifida) may have a pathogenesis different from those of the lower type (lumbosacral spina bifida), since recurrent cases within a sibship were said always to be concordant with respect to NTD type. Also, spontaneous abortion, additional malformation, and recurrence rate were observed to be higher in the upper group, and there was an excess of females in upper NTD probands. To test this hypothesis, we measured the above variables in upper and lower NTDs in a sample from Quebec. We found less than full concordance (50%) of NTD type in 18 sib pairs. Recurrence rate was not significantly lower in the lower NTD group (5.6 v 5.8%). The other variables were in general agreement with previous studies, inconsistent findings possibly attributable to different NTD population incidences. These findings can be accounted for if upper and lower NTDs share a similar pathogenesis and the embryo is more susceptible during early than late neural tube formation.

Full text

PDF
851

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Copp A. J., Brook F. A., Estibeiro J. P., Shum A. S., Cockroft D. L. The embryonic development of mammalian neural tube defects. Prog Neurobiol. 1990;35(5):363–403. doi: 10.1016/0301-0082(90)90037-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dolk H., De Wals P., Gillerot Y., Lechat M. F., Ayme S., Cornel M., Cuschieri A., Garne E., Goujard J., Laurence K. M. Heterogeneity of neural tube defects in Europe: the significance of site of defect and presence of other major anomalies in relation to geographic differences in prevalence. Teratology. 1991 Nov;44(5):547–559. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420440508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Drainer E., May H. M., Tolmie J. L. Do familial neural tube defects breed true? J Med Genet. 1991 Sep;28(9):605–608. doi: 10.1136/jmg.28.9.605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Frecker M. F., Fraser F. C., Heneghan W. D. Are 'upper' and 'lower' neural tube defects aetiologically different? J Med Genet. 1988 Jul;25(7):503–504. doi: 10.1136/jmg.25.7.503-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Frecker M., Fraser F. C. Epidemiological studies of neural tube defects in Newfoundland. Teratology. 1987 Dec;36(3):355–361. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420360312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hall J. G., Friedman J. M., Kenna B. A., Popkin J., Jawanda M., Arnold W. Clinical, genetic, and epidemiological factors in neural tube defects. Am J Hum Genet. 1988 Dec;43(6):827–837. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Horowitz I., McDonald A. D. Anencephaly and spina bifida in the Province of Quebec. Can Med Assoc J. 1969 Apr 26;100(16):748–755. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Khoury M. J., Erickson J. D., James L. M. Etiologic heterogeneity of neural tube defects: clues from epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 1982 Apr;115(4):538–548. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Martínez Frías M. L., Parralo J. A., Salvador J., Frias J. L. Sex ratios in neural tube defects. Lancet. 1986 Oct 11;2(8511):871–872. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)92915-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McBride M. L. Sib risk of anencephaly and spina bifida in British Columbia. Am J Med Genet. 1979;3(4):377–387. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320030409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Müller F., O'Rahilly R. The development of the human brain, the closure of the caudal neuropore, and the beginning of secondary neurulation at stage 12. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1987;176(4):413–430. doi: 10.1007/BF00310083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Seller M. J., Kalousek D. K. Neural tube defects: heterogeneity and homogeneity. Am J Med Genet Suppl. 1986;2:77–87. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320250612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Seller M. J. Neural tube defects and sex ratios. Am J Med Genet. 1987 Mar;26(3):699–707. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320260325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Seller M. J. Neural tube defects: are neurulation and canalization forms causally distinct? Am J Med Genet. 1990 Mar;35(3):394–396. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320350316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Seller M. J., Perkins-Cole K. J. Sex difference in mouse embryonic development at neurulation. J Reprod Fertil. 1987 Jan;79(1):159–161. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0790159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Toriello H. V., Higgins J. V. Possible causal heterogeneity in spina bifida cystica. Am J Med Genet. 1985 May;21(1):13–20. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320210103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Török O., Papp Z. Are the neurulation and canalization forms of neural tube defects causally distinct? Am J Med Genet. 1991 May 1;39(2):241–241. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320390233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. WARBURTON D., FRASER F. C. SPONTANEOUS ABORTION RISKS IN MAN: DATA FROM REPRODUCTIVE HISTORIES COLLECTED IN A MEDICAL GENETICS UNIT. Am J Hum Genet. 1964 Mar;16:1–25. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Genetics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES