Skip to main content
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1976 Apr;60(4):273–278. doi: 10.1136/bjo.60.4.273

Visually evoked cortical potentials in the evaluation of homonymous and bitemporal visual field defects.

H G Wildberger, G H Van Lith, R Wijngaarde, G T Mak
PMCID: PMC1017491  PMID: 1276115

Abstract

Visually evoked cortical potentials were studied in six patients with a homonymous and six with a bitemporal hemianopia by presenting a pattern-reversal stimulus separately to a temporal or nasal retinal area and by recording the responses from leads over the hemispheres. Homonymous visual field defects are characterized by a reduction of VECPs from the affected hemisphere. The disturbance of VECPs in bitemporal hemianopia is more serious, since the fibres from both retinal halves may be damaged by a chiasm tumour.

Full text

PDF
274

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Fisher N. F., Jampolsky A., Scott A. B. Traumatic bitemporal hemianopsia. I. Diagnosis of macular splitting. Am J Ophthalmol. 1968 Feb;65(2):237–242. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(68)93594-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Halliday A. M., McDonald W. I., Mushin J. Delayed visual evoked response in optic neuritis. Lancet. 1972 May 6;1(7758):982–985. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(72)91155-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. KOOI K. A., GUEVENER A. M., BAGCHI B. K. VISUAL EVOKED RESPONSES IN LESIONS OF THE HIGHER OPTIC PATHWAYS. Neurology. 1965 Sep;15:841–854. doi: 10.1212/wnl.15.9.841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lehmann D., Kavanagh R. N., Fender D. H. Field studies of averaged visually evoked EEG potentials in a patient with a split chiasm. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1969 Feb;26(2):193–199. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(69)90210-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mitchell D. E., Blakemore C. Binocular depth perception and the corpus callosum. Vision Res. 1970 Jan;10(1):49–54. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(70)90061-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Oosterhuis H. J., Ponsen L., Jonkman E. J., Magnus O. The average visual response in patients with cerebrovascular disease. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1969 Jul;27(1):23–34. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(69)90105-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Regan D., Heron J. R. Clinical investigation of lesions of the visual pathway: a new objective technique. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1969 Oct;32(5):479–483. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.32.5.479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. VAUGHAN H. G., Jr, KATZMAN R. EVOKED RESPONSE IN VISUAL DISORDERS. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1964 May 8;112:305–319. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1964.tb26759.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES