Abstract
Proper regulation of ion balance across the intestinal epithelium is essential for physiological functions, while ion imbalance causes intestinal disorders with dire health consequences. Ion channels, pumps and exchangers are vital in regulating ion movements-i.e., bioelectric currents- that control epithelial absorption and secretion. Recent in vivo studies used the Drosophila gut to identify conserved pathways that link regulators of Ca2+, Na+ and Cl− with intestinal stem cell (ISC) proliferation. These studies laid a foundation for using the Drosophila gut to identify conserved proliferative responses triggered by bioelectric regulators. We review these studies, discuss their significance as well as the advantages of using Drosophila to unravel conserved bioelectrically induced molecular pathways in the intestinal epithelium under physiological, pathophysiological and regenerative conditions.
Keywords: Intestinal stem cells, gut, ion channels, bioelectric signaling, Drosophila
Ion regulation in the gut
The gut is an organ dedicated to digestion and nutrient absorption. Under physiological conditions, the gut epithelium (see Glossary), which consists of polarized epithelial cells, secretes digestive enzymes and regulates the passage of a variety of nutrients, electrolytes and water from the lumen to the body, and vice versa. The ability of intestinal epithelial cells to absorb nutrients and fluids is essential to body hydration and by extension the animal lifespan. Ion channels, pumps and exchangers are instrumental in electrolyte absorption and secretion and thereby regulate movement of water in the gut. These epithelial ion channels, pumps and exchangers include: i) Na+ and Cl− channels that regulate water absorption and secretion; ii) K+ channels that are responsible for the negative membrane potential that is necessary for ion secretion; and iii) ion pumps and exchangers that help maintain the ionic gradient and osmotic equilibrium [1,2]. The combined functions of these ion channels, pumps, exchangers move charged ions in and out of the epithelium giving rise to the membrane potential. In addition, some receptors, such as cholinergic receptors, regulate Ca2+ signaling, which in turn stimulates ion transport [3,4] . We refer to them as bioelectric regulators due to their ability to regulate epithelial ion dynamics.
Bioelectricity - the flow of electric currents carried by charged ions such as Na+, Ca2+, K+ and Cl− - influences diverse processes including tissue development and patterning [5-7]. In particular, voltage changes in the membrane potential affect biological functions such as cell cycle regulation (reviewed by [8]), tissue patterning [9] and cytoskeletal organization in Drosophila [10]. In addition, endogenous ion currents triggered by ion channels and pumps influence tissue development [11,12], zebrafish fin growth [13] and wound healing [14,15]. Thereby, bioelectricity is considered an instrumental component of morphogenesis, growth and even tissue remodeling and regeneration [7]. How bioelectric currents are transduced in molecular pathways capable of modulating with precision cellular functions so that organs develop to their “correct” form and size is not clear [7]. Still, Ca2+-mediated signal transduction [16] often links bioelectric changes to canonical regulatory networks [5,17]. For example, downstream Ca2+-dependent pathways triggered by K+ channels regulate human T-cell activation and proliferation [18] while promoting morphogenesis in the Drosophila wing [19]. In addition, membrane voltage changes act through Ca2+ signaling to drive anterior gene expression in planaria [20].
During the last decade the Drosophila midgut, which we will refer to as the gut for simplicity, has emerged at the forefront of stem cell studies [21-29]. The Drosophila gut is a single layered epithelium consisting of intestinal stem cells (ISCs) that give rise to daughter cells, the enteroblasts (EBs), which in turn differentiate into two distinct epithelial cell populations, enterocytes (ECs) and enteroendocrine cells (EEs) [28,29]. ECs, which make ~80% of the epithelium, are large polyploid cells specialized in absorption, and EEs are small secretory cells [30]. The simple architecture and cellular composition of the Drosophila gut, combined with the state-of the art genetic toolset available in Drosophila [31,32], facilitated several breakthrough studies that revealed conserved mechanisms underlying the regulation of ISC proliferation [21-29]. Specifically, ISC proliferation is triggered by the activity of several conserved pathways that include the JAK-STAT, epidermal growth factor (EGF), bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) and Wingless pathways [21-27]. During gut regeneration, these pathways are activated by autonomous and non-autonomous release of cytokines from various sources, including the EBs, ECs, ISCs and hemocytes (Drosophila immune cells), as well as the surrounding visceral muscle. The regenerative signaling pathways prompting ISC proliferation have been extensively reviewed elsewhere [33,34].
Even though bioelectrically-controlled regeneration in the gut is not yet established, ion channel dysregulation in the intestine is associated with several diseases including Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBDs) and cancer [1,35]. In this review, we highlight our current knowledge relating to the control of ISC proliferation in the Drosophila gut by bioelectric regulators and examine how studies in flies could further our understanding of the role of bioelectric dynamics in gut homeostasis, regeneration and human diseases.
Conserved regulators of ion dynamics in the Drosophila gut
Recent studies in the Drosophila gut have generated single cell RNA sequencing datasetsi and bulk RNA-seq datasets for specific cell populationsii or regionsiii, either under physiological conditions or following bacterial infection [36-38]. A cell atlas for the whole fly based on single nuclei sequencing has also been generated [39]. These invaluable datasets revealed that conserved ion channels, pumps and exchangers are expressed in the Drosophila gut, offering the opportunity to explore the physiological roles of these bioelectric regulators in the fly gut. In addition, current studies (Table 1) have identified how ISC proliferation is controlled by ion channels, pumps as well as a Ca2+ -regulating receptor [40-44]. Below, we review the significance of these studies and, using the available datasets, provide examples of potential regulators of K+ , Cl−, Na+ and Ca2+ dynamics in the fly gut that appear to be worthy of further exploration (Figure ) based on their conservation, downstream molecular pathways (Table 1) and association with human pathologies.
Table 1:
Bioelectric regulators in the Drosophila gut reviewed in this study
| ISC/EBs | ECs | EEs | Ionic Regulation |
Function | Effects on proliferation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GluR | Cytosolic Ca2+ increase | Regulates proliferation based on nutritional needs [40] | GluR activation increases proliferation through the CREB pathway [40] | ||
| TrpA1 | TrpA1 | Ca2+ influx | Promotes response to injury and noxious bacteria expulsion [42,67] | TrpA1 activation increases proliferation via RAS/ERK MAPK and EGFR signaling [42]. | |
| Piezo | Piezo | Ca2+ influx | Promotes EE differentiation in response to mechanical pressure [41]. | Piezo activation increases proliferation via ERK signaling [41]. | |
| PMCA | PMCA | PMCA | Ca2+ efflux | Promotes Ca2+ balance [40]. | PMCA decrease in progenitor cells triggers proliferation in a CREB-dependent manner [40] |
| ppk4/ENaC | Na+ influx | Regulates epithelial water movement [43]. | ppk4/ENaC increase causes EC osmotic stress that triggers proliferation [43]. | ||
| CFTR | Cl− transport | Regulates nutrient and water epithelial absorption [44]. | CFTR reduction increases proliferation via non autonomous JAK-STAT and EGFR signaling [44]. |
Figure: ISC proliferation under the control of bioelectric regulators in Drosophila.
Recent advances in the Drosophila gut have identified bioelectric regulators (ion channels, pumps, exchangers, receptors) which, by triggering downstream conserved molecular pathways, regulate intestinal stem cell (ISC) proliferation. Dietary Glu activates GluR in ISCs elevating cytoplasmic Ca2+ that promotes proliferation in a CREB-dependent manner [40]. In addition, PMCA reduction triggers proliferation in a CREB-dependent manner[40]. Mechanical pressure in a Piezo-expressing subpopulation of enteroblasts (EBs) triggers Ca2+ influx that promotes ERK-dependent proliferation [41]. Upon noxious stimuli TrpA1 promotes Ca2+ increase and ERK-dependent proliferation [42]. CFTR reduction in ECs leads to Cl− retention, increased Na+ uptake followed by JNK induction and release of EGFR and JAK-STAT proliferative cytokines [43,44]. The schematic depicts additional conserved bioelectric regulators whose expression in the Drosophila gut was detected in gut profiling studies [36-38] and are worth exploring further for their roles in ion transport and gut proliferation. These include Na+/K+ pump, K+ channels in EEs (enteroendocrine cells), cholinergic receptors (mAchR and nAchR), serotonin receptors (5HT1A) and gap junctions. The location of the bioelectric regulators is not representative of their subcellular localization, which in most cases has not been reported. In addition, ion exchange is not indicated in all cases for simplicity.
Ca2+ regulation
mGluR:
Recent work in the Drosophila gut identified that Ca2+ oscillations in ISCs increase in response to mitogenic and dietary signals [40]. This study revealed that administration of dietary Glutamate (L-Glu) increases cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations in ISCs by activating the metabotropic Glutamate G-protein-coupled receptor (mGluR) and promoting proliferation through the conserved Calcineurin/ CREB-regulated transcriptional co-activator (CRTC) pathway [40]. Thus, mGluR-induced Ca2+ dynamics are proposed to link gut proliferation to the nutrient needs of the animal [40]. The association of Calcineurin with Ca2+ dynamics is conserved across animals, but the cellular function can vary for different tissues. For example, in skeletal myoblasts Ca2+ dependent Calcineurin activity promotes differentiation [45].
Ca2+ is a particularly significant and pleiotropic downstream component that impacts almost every aspect of cellular life [16]. Ca2+ signaling in intestinal epithelial cells is a major regulator of ion secretion [3,4]. In addition, Ca2+ carries out significant non-autonomous functions, for example elevated cytosolic Ca2+ triggers bioelectric communication of adjacent cells, electrically coupling them such that they function as a unit [46,47]. Thus, it is not surprising that the gut uses Ca2+ dynamics in ISCs to adapt intestinal epithelial integrity to varying amount of nutrients [40]. Future studies should examine whether mGluR interacts with other ion channels not only in ISCs but also in the adjacent EBs, ECs or EEs via bioelectric or chemical signaling. Such studies could unravel the underlying mechanisms that allow the gut to precisely adjust its physiological functions to match nutritional needs.
Piezo:
The conserved mechanosensitive channel Piezo is a clear example of how Ca2+ dynamics maintain intestinal homeostasis in response to mechanical stress, regularly occurring during digestion [41,48]. Piezo ion channels are shaped as a propeller [49-51]. When closed, the center of the propeller has three blades that curve the membrane, generating a dome-like structure. It has been proposed that as tension on the membrane increases due to mechanical pressure, the dome flattens, the blades straighten and the channel opens [49-51]. Opening of the Piezo channel in the plasma membrane mediates extracellular Ca2+ influx, whereas opening of the Piezo channel in subcellular organelles such as the endoplasmic reticulum/sarcoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, or nucleus elevates Ca2+ levels by release from internal Ca2+ stores [52].
Two recent studies, one in mammalian cells and another in the Drosophila gut, highlighted how Ca2+ signaling through the Piezo channel triggers cell population adjustments in the intestinal epithelium so that normal gut function is maintained despite the mechanical stress that occurs during digestion [41,48]. Both studies found that Piezo activation increases ISC proliferation by stimulating Ca2+-dependent phosphorylation of ERK [41,48], indicating that the mechanism controlling proliferation during mechanical stimulation in the gut is conserved. Moreover, a unique Piezo-expressing subpopulation of EBs was identified in the Drosophila gut that upon mechanical stimulation proliferates and differentiates into secretory EEs [41]. Albeit Piezo-induced proliferation is ERK-dependent in the Drosophila gut, Piezo-induced EE differentiation is ERK-independent and possibly regulated through Notch signaling [41].
Even though most studies focus on Piezo-induced Ca2+ currents [41,48], opening of Piezo channels generate cationic non-selective currents, such that Piezo can also result in flux of Na+ or K+ [53]. Therefore Piezo-induced non-selective currents in the epithelium can affect regulation of ion transport and water movement. Perhaps not surprisingly, abnormalities in gut mechano-sensation are associated with defecation disorders, obesity and colon cancer [54-56]. Further work in the Drosophila gut could help identify interactions of Piezo with other bioelectric regulators and unravel how ion and osmotic balance across the intestinal epithelium is preserved despite mechanical pressure.
TrpA1:
TrpA1 (also known as the wasabi receptor) belongs to the highly conserved transient receptor potential (TRP) multigene superfamily and is found in various tissues including the gut. Similar to most TRPs, TrpA1 is a Ca2+ permeable nonselective cation homo-tetramer channel that localizes to the plasma membrane [57]. Each TrpA1 subunit is composed of six transmembrane regions flanked by amino-terminal ankyrin repeats in the N- terminal tails [57]. TrpA1 has been extensively studied in nociceptor neurons as a detector of irritants or tissue injury and can be activated by a range of chemical, thermal and mechanical stimuli [58]. It can also be activated by pro-inflammatory mediators including oxidative stress byproducts which directly modify cysteine residues in TrpA1 [59,60]. Upon inflammation, TrpA1 is reported to be upregulated, extensively trafficked and translocated to the membrane [58,61]. In the mammalian intestinal epithelium, TrpA1 is found in ECs, enterochromaffin cells and EEs [58]. Although the function of TrpA1 in mammalian gut cells is not as well understood as its function in neurons, TrpA1 has been proposed to regulate intestinal motility, aid in the digestion of specific foods and regulate mechano-sensation [62-66].
The expression of TrpA1 is conserved in the Drosophila gut with potential roles in EEs and ISC/EBs [42,67]. TrpA1 is proposed to sense microbicidal reactive chlorine and trigger bacterial expulsion as a protective response following the activation of the uracil/Duox pathway by pathobionts [67]. In addition, transcriptome analysis of the Drosophila gutii revealed that TrpA1 is mainly expressed in EEs in steady-state conditions but this changes after bacterial infection, with TrpA1 upregulated also in EBs[37]. This resembles the upregulation of TrpA1 after inflammation in mammals [58,61] and suggests that in the Drosophila gut, TrpA1 might sense noxious substances and promote bacteria expulsion from EEs and EBs. Moreover, TrpA1 is proposed to be one of the Ca2+ channels that drive ISC proliferation during Drosophila gut injury [42]. Specifically, TrpA1, together with the ryanodine receptor (RyR), increases intracellular Ca2+ in response to oxidative stress. This, in turn, activates the Ras/ERK MAPK pathway and induces secreted EGF cytokine to promote ISC proliferation [42]. Thus, Ca2+ influx from TrpA1 is associated with release of mitogenic signals and proliferation [42]. Future studies should explore if the same Ca2+-induced pathway triggered by TrpA1 in response of mitogenic signals is concurrently promoting bacterial expulsion during infection or, alternatively, if TrpA1 regulates different Ca2+-induced pathways. A comprehensive understanding of the molecular and bioelectric roles of TrpA1 in the Drosophila gut could be relevant to gastritis, for which TrpA1 has been proposed as a potential therapeutic target [68].
PMCA and Calx:
The plasma membrane Ca2+ ATPase (PMCA) is an ATP-driven pump that removes cytosolic Ca2+ from cells. This function is essential in all eukaryotic cells for the maintenance of a low resting Ca2+ concentration [69]. In the small intestine, PMCA1 is considered the principal driver of Ca2+ extrusion and is linked with Ca2+ absorption deficiency, reduced bone mineralization and hyperparathyroidism [70-72]. In the Drosophila gut, knocking down PMCA in gut progenitor cells leads to Ca2+ oscillation impairment, cytosolic Ca2+ increase and ISC over-proliferation in a CREB-dependent manner [40]. In addition, PMCA reduction in piezo-deficient guts is sufficient to restore the normal number of EEs[41]. Together, these data support the idea that PMCA could be the main driver of Ca2+ extrusion in progenitor cells.
Another Ca2+ efflux pathway found in almost all cells is the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger-mediated efflux pathway. In Drosophila, Calx is the homolog of the mammalian Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX) [73]. Calx is expressed in the Drosophila gut and based on profiling datasetsi-ii Calx expression is as abundant as PMCA in EEs and ECs but less so in ISCs [36,37]. Perhaps Ca2+ removal is regulated by a different mechanism among gut cells, reflecting the different physiological requirements of Ca2+ between progenitor and epithelial cells. This idea would be worth exploring in the Drosophila gut, especially under pathophysiological conditions.
Na+ regulation
ENAC:
The epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) belongs to the voltage independent, Na+ selective ENaC/DEG superfamily that regulates Na+ and water homeostasis in the epithelium [74]. In epithelial cells, ENaC is the main route for Na+ entry and therefore constitutes a vital regulatory mechanism for intracellular Na+ influx [75]. ENaC is composed of heterotrimeric subunits that harbor protease-sensitive domains critical for opening and closing of the channel. When proteases cleave peptidyl tracts from the extracellular domain, ENaC opens and allows Na+ to pass into the cell [76-79].
In Drosophila, the ENaC/DEG superfamily is comprised of 31 family members, the ‘pickpocket’ (ppk) genes [80], which are important regulators of Drosophila wing development [81]. Ppks are also expressed in the intestinal epithelium [43,82] and recent work revealed that ppk4/ENaC expression is downregulated in ECs by the small non-coding RNA miR-263a [43]. Depletion of miR-263a increases ppk4/ENaC mRNA levels, leading to a stress response in ECs due to dehydration and elevated Na+ uptake [43]. This in turn triggers ISC proliferation as well as hyperplasia and promotes increased bacterial load and expression of antimicrobial peptides [43]. Thereby, elevated Na+ uptake triggers responses that resemble the elevated ENaC activation associated with the multi-organ disease Cystic Fibrosis (CF), rendering the Drosophila intestinal epithelium a potential tissue to model CF [43].
ENaC has also been proposed to regulate wound healing [15,75] with in vitro studies reporting that ENaC increases the levels of Ca2+ through interactions with the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, generating a slow Ca2+ wave that controls the rate of wound healing [75]. Future work in the Drosophila gut could help further our understanding of ENaC-stimulated Ca2+ dynamics by studying the interactions of Calx with ppk4/ENaC during epithelial injury and by exploring in vivo the role of cytokines and other inflammatory factors in modulating ppk4/ENaC function.
Na+/K+-pump:
Transcriptome analysis of the Drosophila guti-ii revealed the conserved expression of the Na+/K+-pump [36,37]. This ATPase pump utilizes ATP to move Na+ and K+ against their concentration gradients across the plasma membrane to maintain ion balance. In detail, Atpα which is the essential membrane cation antiporter, forms heterodimers with the β subunits, which are non-catalytic components of ATPase, and, through ATP hydrolysis, regulates the number of Na+ ions shuttled out of the cell while K+ ions are shuttled in. Based on Drosophila gut profilingi-ii the Na+/K+-pump subunit α (Atpα) together with the three β subunits (Nervana 1-3, Nrv1-3) are enriched in EEs compared to ECs and ISC/EBs [36,37], indicating different Na+ efflux and K+ influx requirements among different gut cell types.
Na+/K+-pump dysregulation is associated with diseases like inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) and CF. It is proposed that IBD-related diarrhea is attributed to reduced Na+/K+-pump activity combined with downregulation of ENaC [1,83]. Together they potentially promote accumulation of intracellular Na+, reducing Na+ absorption thereby leading to water and ion imbalance that causes diarrhea [1,83]. Moreover, CF patients have elevated Na+/K+-pump activity across the airway epithelium and in vitro experiments find this activity to be mediated by ENaC [84,85]. Future studies in the Drosophila gut could help reveal conserved molecular pathways that are regulated by the Na+/K+-pump and explore how interactions with conserved Na+ channels like ENaC contribute to disease development.
Cl− regulation
Chloride channels and transporters play vital roles in water absorption and ion balance in the gut [86]. The movement of Cl− throughout the gut has been proposed to control cell membrane potential and cell volume, to maintain the cellular pH and to regulate the balance of electrolytes [86]. Among known Cl− families of channels and transporters, CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) is one of the most well-studied due to its role in CF.
Mammalian CFTR is a Cl− channel regulated by ATP-binding and protein Kinase A (PKA)-dependent phosphorylation [87]. CFTR is composed of a single polypeptide with two transmembrane domains, two nucleotide-binding motifs and a cytoplasmic regulatory domain that controls channel activity [87,88]. This regulatory domain needs to be phosphorylated by PKA for the CFTR channel to be able to open. Once phosphorylated, ATP binding opens CFTR, and ATP hydrolysis then closes the channel [88-90]. CFTR is highly expressed in the airway epithelium and the intestinal epithelium [91]. Mutations in CFTR lead to CF, which is characterized by infection and damage in the lung and is also associated with microbiota imbalance and inflammation in the gut [92-95].
A recent study identified the Drosophila equivalent of human CFTR (Dmel\CFTR) [44]. This Cl− channel shares structural and functional properties with the human channel and is expressed in ECs [44]. ECs in the Drosophila gut are required for nutrient and water absorption and knocking down Dmel\CFTR in these cells leads to a disruption of Cl− transport, abnormal cellular swelling, EC damage and increased expression of mucin genes [44], reminiscent of CF. These CF-related phenotypes are associated with release of cytokines and with non-autonomous activation of JAK/STAT and EGFR pathways which trigger extreme ISC proliferation and hyperplasia in the Drosophila gut [44].
In the mammalian epithelium, CFTR is proposed to interact with other ion channels such as nicotinic receptors and the epithelial Na+ channel ENaC to maintain ion balance [3,96,97]. In support of the idea that ion balance in Drosophila and mammalian epithelial cells share similar mechanisms, Dmel\CFTR depletion increases ENaC-mediated Na+ uptake and osmotic stress in ECs [44]. Future studies in the Drosophila gut focusing on the relationship between CFTR with other ion channels could help reveal conserved intracellular pathways associated with CF-related symptoms.
Based on Drosophila gut profiling datasetsi-ii other chloride channels such as Chloride channel-a (CIC-a) and CIC-b are expressed in ECs, EEs and ISC/EBs [36,37] but their roles in the fly gut epithelium have not been established. Future studies in the Drosophila gut could explore whether additional Cl− channels together with CFTR maintain ion balance and regulate ISC proliferation through JAK/STAT and EGFR pathways [44]. Having a comprehensive understanding of how Cl− channels regulate proliferation is important since CFTR has been proposed to act as a tumor suppressor in intestinal cancer [98] and chloride channels in general are proposed to have roles beyond homeostatic ion balance [86].
K+ regulation
K+ channels are another type of ion channel found in the gut. These channels consist of a primary pore-forming α-subunit that controls K+ transport and is often associated with a regulatory β-subunit that sense a variety of stimuli [99]. In general, K+ channels maintain K+ homeostasis by regulating K+ influx and efflux and play significant roles in diverse cellular functions, including cell volume regulation, differentiation and apoptosis [100]. In the gastrointestinal tract, K+ channels are involved in the production of gastric acid and regulation of secretion [101-103], and changes in K+ channel activity are associated with intestinal diseases such as IBDs [104,105].
There are four families of K+ channels: the i) Ca2+- and Na+- activated K+ channels (Kca/Na); ii) inwardly rectifying potassium channels (Kir); iii) two-pore domain K+ channels (K2P); and iv) voltage-gated potassium channels (Kv) [99,104,106]. Profiling of the Drosophila guti-ii [36,37] identified the expression of a variety of K+ channels and revealed that the expression of genes encoding Kv channels such as Shaker (Sh) and Shaker cognate I (ShaI) is enriched in secretory EEs compared to other gut cells. Therefore it would be worth exploring whether Kv channels regulate gut-hormone release from EEs, and consequentially affect intestinal lipid metabolism [107], feeding [108] and ISC proliferation [109].
In addition, gut profiling after infectionii [37] revealed that Sh and ShaI levels increase in EBs. K+ channels have been reported to regulate cell cycle progression and proliferation (reviewed by [110]), so their upregulation in the infected gut could be suggestive of potential roles during damage-induced EB mitosis [111]. Since K+ channels have been implicated in carcinogenesis [112,113], future studies in the Drosophila gut should explore the role of K+ channels under pathophysiological conditions like damage-induced regeneration and help identify conserved signaling pathways triggered by K+ channels that may contribute to tumor development.
Cholinergic and Serotonin receptors:
A group of major regulators for ion transport in the gut epithelium are the cholinergic receptors [4]. Not surprisingly, disruption of cholinergic signaling in the gut is associated with several intestinal diseases, including IBDs and cancers [4,114-116]. Cholinergic receptors fall into two categories: i) the G-coupled muscarinic receptors, which upon activation are proposed to raise intracellular Ca2+ causing Ca2+-dependent K+ outflow and subsequent Cl− secretion, and ii) the ligand gated ion channels, nicotinic receptors that upon acetylcholine (Ach) activation are permeable to cations [4]. Drosophila gut profilingi-iii [36-38] revealed the expression of mAchR subtypes and different nAchR subunits, resembling the mammalian gut and suggesting that the role of the cholinergic pathway in regulating epithelial ion transport and water movement might be conserved. Moreover, Drosophila EC subpopulations like aEC1 and pEC3 express nAchR subunits α5 and β3 together with the Cl− channel CFTR. Since mammalian nAchRs in airway epithelial cells are proposed to regulate Cl− channels like CFTR [96], such interactions may be conserved and worth exploring for their role in promoting ion transport and for their contributions to CF-related symptoms in the Drosophila intestinal epithelium [44].
Single cell Drosophila gut profilingi [36] revealed that a specific subpopulations of EEs co-expresses cholinergic and serotonin receptors- also found in the mammalian gut [117]. Specifically, the serotonin G-coupled receptor 5-HT1A together with cholinergic receptors mAchR-A, mAchR-C, nAchRα3 and nAchRα5 are expressed in a subpopulation of EEs that secrete the peptide Allatostatin-A (Asta-A) which is reported to regulate K+ transport [118]. In addition, serotonin and cholinergic receptors are being investigated as potential therapeutic targets for IBDs [119-121], albeit they are very rarely studied together. Future studies in the Drosophila gut should explore whether the intersection of serotonergic- and cholinergic-induced pathways in Asta-A expressing EEs play any role in maintaining K+ balance in the intestinal epithelium, especially since increased K+ secretion is common in IBD patients [122].
Perspectives on bioelectric signaling in the Drosophila gut
Ion channels and pumps are vital in initiating bioelectric signaling (endogenous ion currents) which is followed by the flow of electric currents across adjacent cells through electrical synapses known as gap junctions. Gap junctions open and close in response to a variety of regulatory inputs, including voltage changes and shifts in intracellular pH or Ca2+ concentrations [47]. When open, gap junctions allow electric currents to flow between cells, causing them to electrically couple. This bioelectric coupling has been proposed to help cells cooperate towards larger scale outcomes; for instance, promoting proper growth and patterning during development [6,7].
Gap junctions are composed of two hexameric hemichannels that connect the cytoplasm of neighboring cells. The compositions of gap junctions vary because each connecting hemichannel can be the same (homotypic) or different (heterotypic) per cell and consists of transmembrane proteins which assemble in homomeric or heteromeric forms. In Drosophila, the transmembrane proteins that form gap junctions belong to the Innexin (Inx) family [123]. Roles for innexins have been reported in development [124-127], cell proliferation and differentiation during spermatogenesis[128]. Profiling data in the Drosophila guti-ii show diverse Inx expression [36,37]. Specifically, Inx3, Inx7 and Inx2 are expressed in progenitor cells (ISC/EBs); Inx2, Inx7 and Inx1 in ECs; and only Inx2 and Inx7 are found in EEs. The functions of Innexins in the adult Drosophila gut remain understudied, but in other invertebrate systems, namely C. elegans, gap junctions between intestinal cells propagate Ca2+ waves to promote defecation[129]. Similar waves could exist in the adult Drosophila gut and their roles in stimulating physiological functions like defection as well as potential interactions with channels like TrpA1 or Piezo should be further explored.
Bioelectric signaling during regeneration and wound healing is getting a lot of attention for the exciting prospect of using electric interventions as therapeutics [6,7,130,131]. However, having a comprehensive understanding in vivo of the impact of ion currents in the regulatory networks of a regenerative tissue can be challenging given the pleotropic nature of these currents (e.g Ca2+ signaling). The extensive understanding of the molecular pathways regulating Drosophila gut regeneration combined with the state-of-the art genetic tools have the potential to make Drosophila gut an excellent bioelectric model during regeneration. For example, sophisticated tools available for Drosophila such as genetically encoded Calcium indicators (GECIs, e.g. GCAMP)[132-134], voltage indicators (GEVIs, e.g. ArcLight) [135], FRET-based indicators (e.g Cl− reporter Clomeleon [136]), and activated cation channels (e.g. CsChrimson) [137], make Drosophila an attractive in vivo model for exploring ion current propagation via gap junctions as well as studying the initiation of endogenous ion flows by different bioelectric regulators. In addition, the multiple binary expression systems available for Drosophila (i.e., Gal4/UAS, LexA/LexAop and QF/QUAS) [32,138,139] allow specific temporal and spatial in vivo perturbations that could facilitate the precise dissection of pathways induced by gap junctions and bioelectric regulators in different cells. Together, these tools could link with great specificity bioelectric networks to molecular pathways and expand our current view on gut regeneration and healing.
Concluding remarks
Studies in the Drosophila gut, building on previous studies [40-44,67], provide an opportunity to further dissect the bioelectric roles of ion channels, pumps and receptors and explore in vivo their interactions with gap junctions during physiological, pathophysiological, and regenerative conditions (see Outstanding Questions box). For example, recent advances indicate that Drosophila ingestion involves the activation of mGluR- and Piezo-inducing Ca2+ dynamics in progenitor cells [40,41]. Dietary Glu has been reported to activate mGluR which increases cytosolic Ca2+ in ISCs triggering CREB-induced proliferation, while food-induced mechanical pressure elevates Ca2+ influx in Piezo-expressing EBs triggering proliferation through ERK signaling [40,41]. Therefore, what is perceived as steady-state gut physiological function likely involves two independent Ca2+ regulators in adjacent progenitor cells concurrently triggering proliferation through different Ca2+-dependent molecular pathways. Further work studying the interactions of mGluR and Piezo in the Drosophila gut during physiological conditions will expand our understanding on how nutritional needs and mechanical pressures in the gut are decoded to regulate proliferative responses.
Outstanding questions:
How do mGluR- and Piezo-induced Ca2+ dynamics work together to regulate proliferation during ingestion?
How do TrpA1-induded Ca2+ dynamics in the damaged epithelium promote proliferative and bacteria expulsion responses?
How do bioelectric interactions of ENaC with the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger and the Na+/K+-pump contribute to gut regeneration?
What are the interactions of nAchRs with CFTR or other Cl− channels during the development of CF-like symptoms?
What is the function of K+ channels in EEs and do they affect gut regeneration?
Which bioelectric regulators help the intestinal epithelium meet the variable ion demands during gut regeneration and disease development?
Do bioelectric regulators in the gut trigger endogenous ion currents during physiological and regenerative conditions? What is the nature of the molecular pathways that are affected in response to these bioelectric currents? What are the interactions between bioelectric regulators and gap junctions during these intestinal bioelectric currents?
In addition, transcriptome analysis upon bacterial infection in the Drosophila gutii-ii [37,38] revealed that the expression of various ion channels is altered across the epithelium. TrpA1, Sh and ShaI are all increased in EBs during infection indicative of elevated Ca2+ and K+ demands when rapid proliferation is triggered. Future studies in the Drosophila gut could help decipher which bioelectric regulators are vital in helping the intestinal epithelium meet the varying ion demands during pathophysiological conditions like regeneration, infection or CF-like development. The advanced genetic tools available in Drosophila, could help identify in vivo which bioelectric regulators and conserved molecular pathways are involved per cell type and find roles for gap junctions and bioelectric currents across the epithelium in different regenerative and disease-like states. Together this new information could ultimately have great therapeutic value for diseases including IBDs, CF and cancer.
Highlights.
Ion channels, pumps and exchangers regulate the transport of ions like Na+, Cl− , K+ and Ca2+ in and out of cells and gap junctions allow the movement of ions across cells.
Ion imbalance is highly associated with intestinal disorders and even cancer, therefore a genetic model capable of decoding in vivo how ion regulation affects intestinal stem cell proliferation could have great therapeutic value.
Recent advances in the adult Drosophila gut, identify different molecular mechanisms by which conserved ion channels regulate intestinal stem cell proliferation.
The Drosophila gut is an attractive in vivo model to decipher how ion regulation and bioelectric currents affect conserved molecular pathways that drive proliferation during physiological and pathophysiological states.
Acknowledgements
We thank Stephanie Mohr and Liz Lane for comments on the manuscript. A.P is supported by the Center for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (DK043351). N.P is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
Glossary:
- Gut epithelium
a single cell layer of intestinal epithelial cells
- Ion channel
proteins forming pores that allow the flow of ions across membranes
- Ion pump
active channels that use ATP hydrolysis to transfer ions from one side of the membrane to the other
- Ion exchanger
bidirectional ion transporter
- Nicotinic receptors
ligand gated ion channels, activated by acetylcholine
- Cholinergic receptors
receptors activated by acetylcholine and include the nicotinic and muscarinic receptors
- Serotonin receptors
G protein-coupled receptors and ligand-gated ion channels activated by serotonin
- Bioelectric regulators
ion channels, ion pumps, ion exchangers or receptors regulating epithelial ion dynamics
- Cytokines
any substances secreted by innate immune cells as well as epithelial cells and affect other cells
- Gap junctions
specialized intercellular connections between adjacent cells allowing the flow of ions and electrical impulses
- Hemichannel
half of a gap junction formed by the oligomerization of six subunits-innexins in invertebrates and connexins in vertebrates
Footnotes
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing or financial interests
References:
- 1.Magalhaes D et al. (2016) Role of epithelial ion transports in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 310, G460–476. 10.1152/ajpgi.00369.2015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Vazhaikkurichi M Rajendran J-DS, Ursula E Seidler (2018) Chapter 58 - Ion Channels of the Gastrointestinal Epithelial Cells. In Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract (Sixth Edition) (Said HM, ed), pp. 1363–1404, [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yang X et al. (2018) Molecular mechanisms of calcium signaling in the modulation of small intestinal ion transports and bicarbonate secretion. Oncotarget 9, 3727–3740. 10.18632/oncotarget.23197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hirota CL and McKay DM (2006) Cholinergic regulation of epithelial ion transport in the mammalian intestine. Br J Pharmacol 149, 463–479. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706889 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Levin M and Martyniuk CJ (2018) The bioelectric code: An ancient computational medium for dynamic control of growth and form. Biosystems 164, 76–93. 10.1016/j.biosystems.2017.08.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Harris MP (2021) Bioelectric signaling as a unique regulator of development and regeneration. Development 148. 10.1242/dev.180794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Levin M (2021) Bioelectric signaling: Reprogrammable circuits underlying embryogenesis, regeneration, and cancer. Cell 184, 1971–1989. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.02.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Blackiston DJ et al. (2009) Bioelectric controls of cell proliferation: ion channels, membrane voltage and the cell cycle. Cell Cycle 8, 3527–3536. 10.4161/cc.8.21.9888 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Emmons-Bell M and Hariharan IK (2021) Membrane potential regulates Hedgehog signalling in the Drosophila wing imaginal disc. EMBO Rep 22, e51861. 10.15252/embr.202051861 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schotthofer SK and Bohrmann J (2020) Analysing bioelectrical phenomena in the Drosophila ovary with genetic tools: tissue-specific expression of sensors for membrane potential and intracellular pH, and RNAi-knockdown of mechanisms involved in ion exchange. BMC Dev Biol 20, 15. 10.1186/s12861-020-00220-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Atsuta Y et al. (2019) L-type voltage-gated Ca(2+) channel CaV1.2 regulates chondrogenesis during limb development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116, 21592–21601. 10.1073/pnas.1908981116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Panakova D et al. (2010) Wnt11 patterns a myocardial electrical gradient through regulation of the L-type Ca(2+) channel. Nature 466, 874–878. 10.1038/nature09249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Daane JM et al. (2018) Bioelectric-calcineurin signaling module regulates allometric growth and size of the zebrafish fin. Sci Rep 8, 10391. 10.1038/s41598-018-28450-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fraire-Zamora JJ and Simons M (2018) Vacuolar ATPase is required for ERK-dependent wound healing in the Drosophila embryo. Wound Repair Regen 26, 102–107. 10.1111/wrr.12617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Justet C et al. (2013) ENaC contribution to epithelial wound healing is independent of the healing mode and of any increased expression in the channel. Cell Tissue Res 353, 53–64. 10.1007/s00441-013-1635-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Clapham DE (2007) Calcium signaling. Cell 131, 1047–1058. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Levin M (2009) Bioelectric mechanisms in regeneration: Unique aspects and future perspectives. Semin Cell Dev Biol 20, 543–556. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.04.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lin CS et al. (1993) Voltage-gated potassium channels regulate calcium-dependent pathways involved in human T lymphocyte activation. J Exp Med 177, 637–645. 10.1084/jem.177.3.637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dahal GR et al. (2017) Inwardly rectifying potassium channels influence Drosophila wing morphogenesis by regulating Dpp release. Development 144, 2771–2783. 10.1242/dev.146647 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Beane WS et al. (2011) A chemical genetics approach reveals H,K-ATPase-mediated membrane voltage is required for planarian head regeneration. Chem Biol 18, 77–89. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.11.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cordero JB et al. (2012) Inducible progenitor-derived Wingless regulates adult midgut regeneration in Drosophila. EMBO J 31, 3901–3917. 10.1038/emboj.2012.248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Guo Z et al. (2013) Injury-induced BMP signaling negatively regulates Drosophila midgut homeostasis. J Cell Biol 201, 945–961. 10.1083/jcb.201302049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jiang H et al. (2009) Cytokine/Jak/Stat signaling mediates regeneration and homeostasis in the Drosophila midgut. Cell 137, 1343–1355. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Karpowicz P et al. (2010) The Hippo tumor suppressor pathway regulates intestinal stem cell regeneration. Development 137, 4135–4145. 10.1242/dev.060483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ayyaz A et al. (2015) Haemocytes control stem cell activity in the Drosophila intestine. Nat Cell Biol 17, 736–748. 10.1038/ncb3174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Biteau B and Jasper H (2011) EGF signaling regulates the proliferation of intestinal stem cells in Drosophila. Development 138, 1045–1055. 10.1242/dev.056671 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Buchon N et al. (2010) Drosophila EGFR pathway coordinates stem cell proliferation and gut remodeling following infection. BMC Biol 8, 152. 10.1186/1741-7007-8-152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ohlstein B and Spradling A (2006) The adult Drosophila posterior midgut is maintained by pluripotent stem cells. Nature 439, 470–474. 10.1038/nature04333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Micchelli CA and Perrimon N (2006) Evidence that stem cells reside in the adult Drosophila midgut epithelium. Nature 439, 475–479. 10.1038/nature04371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Miguel-Aliaga I et al. (2018) Anatomy and Physiology of the Digestive Tract of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 210, 357–396. 10.1534/genetics.118.300224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.del Valle Rodriguez A et al. (2011) Power tools for gene expression and clonal analysis in Drosophila. Nat Methods 9, 47–55. 10.1038/nmeth.1800 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Brand AH and Perrimon N (1993) Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118, 401–415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jiang H et al. (2016) Intestinal stem cell response to injury: lessons from Drosophila. Cell Mol Life Sci 73, 3337–3349. 10.1007/s00018-016-2235-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Karin M and Clevers H (2016) Reparative inflammation takes charge of tissue regeneration. Nature 529, 307–315. 10.1038/nature17039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Anderson KJ et al. (2019) Role of ion channels in gastrointestinal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 25, 5732–5772. 10.3748/wjg.v25.i38.5732 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hung RJ et al. (2020) A cell atlas of the adult Drosophila midgut. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117, 1514–1523. 10.1073/pnas.1916820117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dutta D et al. (2015) Regional Cell-Specific Transcriptome Mapping Reveals Regulatory Complexity in the Adult Drosophila Midgut. Cell Rep 12, 346–358. 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Buchon N et al. (2013) Morphological and molecular characterization of adult midgut compartmentalization in Drosophila. Cell Rep 3, 1725–1738. 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Li H et al. (2022) Fly Cell Atlas: A single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas of the adult fruit fly. Science 375, eabk2432. 10.1126/science.abk2432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Deng H et al. (2015) Signal integration by Ca(2+) regulates intestinal stem-cell activity. Nature 528, 212–217. 10.1038/nature16170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.He L et al. (2018) Mechanical regulation of stem-cell differentiation by the stretch-activated Piezo channel. Nature 555, 103–106. 10.1038/nature25744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Xu C et al. (2017) Oxidative stress induces stem cell proliferation via TRPA1/RyR-mediated Ca(2+) signaling in the Drosophila midgut. Elife 6. 10.7554/eLife.22441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kim K et al. (2017) miR-263a Regulates ENaC to Maintain Osmotic and Intestinal Stem Cell Homeostasis in Drosophila. Dev Cell 40, 23–36. 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.11.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kim K et al. (2020) Drosophila as a model for studying cystic fibrosis pathophysiology of the gastrointestinal system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117, 10357–10367. 10.1073/pnas.1913127117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Friday BB et al. (2000) Calcineurin activity is required for the initiation of skeletal muscle differentiation. J Cell Biol 149, 657–666. 10.1083/jcb.149.3.657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Moore KB et al. (2020) Localized Calcium Signaling and the Control of Coupling at Cx36 Gap Junctions. eNeuro 7. 10.1523/ENEURO.0445-19.2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Peracchia C (2004) Chemical gating of gap junction channels; roles of calcium, pH and calmodulin. Biochim Biophys Acta 1662, 61–80. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2003.10.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Gudipaty SA et al. (2017) Mechanical stretch triggers rapid epithelial cell division through Piezo1. Nature 543, 118–121. 10.1038/nature21407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zhao Q et al. (2018) Structure and mechanogating mechanism of the Piezo1 channel. Nature 554, 487–492. 10.1038/nature25743 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Guo YR and MacKinnon R (2017) Structure-based membrane dome mechanism for Piezo mechanosensitivity. Elife 6. 10.7554/eLife.33660 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Saotome K et al. (2018) Structure of the mechanically activated ion channel Piezo1. Nature 554, 481–486. 10.1038/nature25453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Liao J et al. (2021) Upregulation of Piezo1 (Piezo Type Mechanosensitive Ion Channel Component 1) Enhances the Intracellular Free Calcium in Pulmonary Arterial Smooth Muscle Cells From Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Patients. Hypertension 77, 1974–1989. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Coste B et al. (2010) Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically activated cation channels. Science 330, 55–60. 10.1126/science.1193270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Acosta A et al. (2015) Quantitative gastrointestinal and psychological traits associated with obesity and response to weight-loss therapy. Gastroenterology 148, 537–546 e534. 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.11.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Neshatian L et al. (2015) Ranolazine inhibits voltage-gated mechanosensitive sodium channels in human colon circular smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 309, G506–512. 10.1152/ajpgi.00051.2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Fernandez-Sanchez ME et al. (2015) Mechanical induction of the tumorigenic beta-catenin pathway by tumour growth pressure. Nature 523, 92–95. 10.1038/nature14329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Paulsen CE et al. (2015) Structure of the TRPA1 ion channel suggests regulatory mechanisms. Nature 525, 552. 10.1038/nature14871 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Talavera K et al. (2020) Mammalian Transient Receptor Potential TRPA1 Channels: From Structure to Disease. Physiol Rev 100, 725–803. 10.1152/physrev.00005.2019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Takahashi N et al. (2008) Molecular characterization of TRPA1 channel activation by cysteine-reactive inflammatory mediators. Channels (Austin) 2, 287–298. 10.4161/chan.2.4.6745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Trevisani M et al. (2007) 4-Hydroxynonenal, an endogenous aldehyde, causes pain and neurogenic inflammation through activation of the irritant receptor TRPA1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104, 13519–13524. 10.1073/pnas.0705923104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Liu J et al. (2020) Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Regulates the TRPA1 Expression in Human Odontoblast-Like Cells. J Pain Res 13, 1655–1664. 10.2147/JPR.S255288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Cho HJ et al. (2014) Identification of enteroendocrine cells that express TRPA1 channels in the mouse intestine. Cell Tissue Res 356, 77–82. 10.1007/s00441-013-1780-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Brierley SM et al. (2009) The ion channel TRPA1 is required for normal mechanosensation and is modulated by algesic stimuli. Gastroenterology 137, 2084–2095 e2083. 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.07.048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Moparthi L and Zygmunt PM (2020) Human TRPA1 is an inherently mechanosensitive bilayer-gated ion channel. Cell Calcium 91, 102255. 10.1016/j.ceca.2020.102255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Yang Y et al. (2019) TRPA1-expressing lamina propria mesenchymal cells regulate colonic motility. JCI Insight 4. 10.1172/jci.insight.122402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Nozawa K et al. (2009) TRPA1 regulates gastrointestinal motility through serotonin release from enterochromaffin cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106, 3408–3413. 10.1073/pnas.0805323106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Du EJ et al. (2016) TrpA1 Regulates Defecation of Food-Borne Pathogens under the Control of the Duox Pathway. PLoS Genet 12, e1005773. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005773 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Tziatzios G et al. (2020) Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis in Functional Dyspepsia. Microorganisms 8. 10.3390/microorganisms8050691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Bruce J (2010) Plasma membrane calcium pump regulation by metabolic stress. World J Biol Chem 1, 221–228. 10.4331/wjbc.v1.i7.221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Liu C et al. (2013) Impaired intestinal calcium absorption in protein 4.1R-deficient mice due to altered expression of plasma membrane calcium ATPase 1b (PMCA1b). J Biol Chem 288, 11407–11415. 10.1074/jbc.M112.436659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Hoenderop JG et al. (2005) Calcium absorption across epithelia. Physiol Rev 85, 373–422. 10.1152/physrev.00003.2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Ryan ZC et al. (2015) Deletion of the intestinal plasma membrane calcium pump, isoform 1, Atp2b1, in mice is associated with decreased bone mineral density and impaired responsiveness to 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 467, 152–156. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.09.087 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Wang T et al. (2005) Light activation, adaptation, and cell survival functions of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger CalX. Neuron 45, 367–378. 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Garty H and Palmer LG (1997) Epithelial sodium channels: function, structure, and regulation. Physiol Rev 77, 359–396. 10.1152/physrev.1997.77.2.359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Chifflet S and Hernandez JA (2016) The Epithelial Sodium Channel and the Processes of Wound Healing. Biomed Res Int 2016, 5675047. 10.1155/2016/5675047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Noreng S et al. (2018) Structure of the human epithelial sodium channel by cryo-electron microscopy. Elife 7. 10.7554/eLife.39340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Vallet V et al. (1997) An epithelial serine protease activates the amiloride-sensitive sodium channel. Nature 389, 607–610. 10.1038/39329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Vallet V et al. (2002) Cell-surface expression of the channel activating protease xCAP-1 is required for activation of ENaC in the Xenopus oocyte. J Am Soc Nephrol 13, 588–594. 10.1681/ASN.V133588 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Vuagniaux G et al. (2002) Synergistic activation of ENaC by three membrane-bound channel-activating serine proteases (mCAP1, mCAP2, and mCAP3) and serum- and glucocorticoid-regulated kinase (Sgk1) in Xenopus Oocytes. J Gen Physiol 120, 191–201. 10.1085/jgp.20028598 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Zelle KM et al. (2013) The genetic architecture of degenerin/epithelial sodium channels in Drosophila. G3 (Bethesda) 3, 441–450. 10.1534/g3.112.005272 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.George LF et al. (2019) Ion Channel Contributions to Wing Development in Drosophila melanogaster. G3 (Bethesda) 9, 999–1008. 10.1534/g3.119.400028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Liu L et al. (2003) Drosophila DEG/ENaC pickpocket genes are expressed in the tracheal system, where they may be involved in liquid clearance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100, 2128–2133. 10.1073/pnas.252785099 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Sullivan S et al. (2009) Downregulation of sodium transporters and NHERF proteins in IBD patients and mouse colitis models: potential contributors to IBD-associated diarrhea. Inflamm Bowel Dis 15, 261–274. 10.1002/ibd.20743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Scambler T et al. (2019) ENaC-mediated sodium influx exacerbates NLRP3-dependent inflammation in cystic fibrosis. Elife 8. 10.7554/eLife.49248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Peckham D et al. (1997) Na+/K+ ATPase in lower airway epithelium from cystic fibrosis and non-cystic-fibrosis lung. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 232, 464–468. 10.1006/bbrc.1997.6200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Kim HJ et al. (2022) Chloride Channels and Transporters: Roles beyond Classical Cellular Homeostatic pH or Ion Balance in Cancers. Cancers (Basel) 14. 10.3390/cancers14040856 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Zhang Z et al. (2018) Molecular structure of the ATP-bound, phosphorylated human CFTR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115, 12757–12762. 10.1073/pnas.1815287115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Liu F et al. (2017) Molecular Structure of the Human CFTR Ion Channel. Cell 169, 85–95 e88. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Csanady L et al. (2005) Functional roles of nonconserved structural segments in CFTR's NH2-terminal nucleotide binding domain. J Gen Physiol 125, 43–55. 10.1085/jgp.200409174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Gunderson KL and Kopito RR (1995) Conformational states of CFTR associated with channel gating: the role ATP binding and hydrolysis. Cell 82, 231–239. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90310-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Strong TV et al. (1994) Localization of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator mRNA in the human gastrointestinal tract by in situ hybridization. J Clin Invest 93, 347–354. 10.1172/JCI116966 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Tam RY et al. (2022) Intestinal Inflammation and Alterations in the Gut Microbiota in Cystic Fibrosis: A Review of the Current Evidence, Pathophysiology and Future Directions. J Clin Med 11. 10.3390/jcm11030649 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Crites KS et al. (2015) CFTR Knockdown induces proinflammatory changes in intestinal epithelial cells. J Inflamm (Lond) 12, 62. 10.1186/s12950-015-0107-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Meeker SM et al. (2020) CFTR dysregulation drives active selection of the gut microbiome. PLoS Pathog 16, e1008251. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Perez A et al. (2007) CFTR inhibition mimics the cystic fibrosis inflammatory profile. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 292, L383–395. 10.1152/ajplung.00403.2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Maouche K et al. (2013) Contribution of alpha7 nicotinic receptor to airway epithelium dysfunction under nicotine exposure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110, 4099–4104. 10.1073/pnas.1216939110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Berdiev BK et al. (2009) Assessment of the CFTR and ENaC association. Mol Biosyst 5, 123–127. 10.1039/b810471a [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Than BLN et al. (2017) CFTR is a tumor suppressor gene in murine and human intestinal cancer. Oncogene 36, 3504. 10.1038/onc.2017.3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Kuang Q et al. (2015) Structure of potassium channels. Cell Mol Life Sci 72, 3677–3693. 10.1007/s00018-015-1948-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Heitzmann D and Warth R (2008) Physiology and pathophysiology of potassium channels in gastrointestinal epithelia. Physiol Rev 88, 1119–1182. 10.1152/physrev.00020.2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Grahammer F et al. (2001) The cardiac K+ channel KCNQ1 is essential for gastric acid secretion. Gastroenterology 120, 1363–1371. 10.1053/gast.2001.24053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Dedek K and Waldegger S (2001) Colocalization of KCNQ1/KCNE channel subunits in the mouse gastrointestinal tract. Pflugers Arch 442, 896–902. 10.1007/s004240100609 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Sausbier M et al. (2006) Distal colonic K(+) secretion occurs via BK channels. J Am Soc Nephrol 17, 1275–1282. 10.1681/ASN.2005101111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Han J et al. (2016) Potassium Channelopathies and Gastrointestinal Ulceration. Gut Liver 10, 881–889. 10.5009/gnl15414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Anbazhagan AN et al. (2018) Pathophysiology of IBD associated diarrhea. Tissue Barriers 6, e1463897. 10.1080/21688370.2018.1463897 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Cosme D et al. (2021) Potassium channels in intestinal epithelial cells and their pharmacological modulation: a systematic review. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 320, C520–C546. 10.1152/ajpcell.00393.2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Song W et al. (2014) Control of lipid metabolism by tachykinin in Drosophila. Cell Rep 9, 40–47. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Yoshinari Y et al. (2021) The sugar-responsive enteroendocrine neuropeptide F regulates lipid metabolism through glucagon-like and insulin-like hormones in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Commun 12, 4818. 10.1038/s41467-021-25146-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Amcheslavsky A et al. (2014) Enteroendocrine cells support intestinal stem-cell-mediated homeostasis in Drosophila. Cell Rep 9, 32–39. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Urrego D et al. (2014) Potassium channels in cell cycle and cell proliferation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 369, 20130094. 10.1098/rstb.2013.0094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Tian A et al. (2022) Damage-induced regeneration of the intestinal stem cell pool through enteroblast mitosis in the Drosophila midgut. EMBO J 41, e110834. 10.15252/embj.2022110834 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Girault A et al. (2020) Roles for Ca(2+) and K(+) channels in cancer cells exposed to the hypoxic tumour microenvironment. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res 1867, 118644. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2020.118644 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Pardo LA and Stuhmer W (2014) The roles of K(+) channels in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 14, 39–48. 10.1038/nrc3635 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Muller I et al. (2021) Cholinergic Signaling Attenuates Pro-Inflammatory Interleukin-8 Response in Colonic Epithelial Cells. Front Immunol 12, 781147. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.781147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Konishi M et al. (2019) Role of Muscarinic Acetylcholine Signaling in Gastrointestinal Cancers. Biomedicines 7. 10.3390/biomedicines7030058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Rueda Ruzafa L et al. (2021) Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Involvement in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Interactions with Gut Microbiota. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18. 10.3390/ijerph18031189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Guzel T and Mirowska-Guzel D (2022) The Role of Serotonin Neurotransmission in Gastrointestinal Tract and Pharmacotherapy. Molecules 27. 10.3390/molecules27051680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Vanderveken M and O'Donnell MJ (2014) Effects of diuretic hormone 31, drosokinin, and allatostatin A on transepithelial K(+) transport and contraction frequency in the midgut and hindgut of larval Drosophila melanogaster. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 85, 76–93. 10.1002/arch.21144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Motavallian A et al. (2019) Anti-inflammatory effects of alosetron mediated through 5-HT3 receptors on experimental colitis. Res Pharm Sci 14, 228–236. 10.4103/1735-5362.258489 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.AlSharari SD et al. (2020) The alpha9alpha10 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors antagonist alpha-conotoxin RgIA reverses colitis signs in murine dextran sodium sulfate model. Eur J Pharmacol 883, 173320. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Maruta K et al. (2018) Nicotine treatment ameliorates DSS-induced colitis by suppressing MAdCAM-1 expression and leukocyte recruitment. J Leukoc Biol 104, 1013–1022. 10.1002/JLB.3A0717-304R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Barkas F et al. (2013) Electrolyte and acid-base disorders in inflammatory bowel disease. Ann Gastroenterol 26, 23–28 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Sanchez A et al. (2019) Gap Junction Channels of Innexins and Connexins: Relations and Computational Perspectives. Int J Mol Sci 20. 10.3390/ijms20102476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Lehmann C et al. (2006) Heteromerization of innexin gap junction proteins regulates epithelial tissue organization in Drosophila. Mol Biol Cell 17, 1676–1685. 10.1091/mbc.e05-11-1059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Sahu A et al. (2017) A Gap Junction Protein, Inx2, Modulates Calcium Flux to Specify Border Cell Fate during Drosophila oogenesis. PLoS Genet 13, e1006542. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006542 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Holcroft CE et al. (2013) Innexins Ogre and Inx2 are required in glial cells for normal postembryonic development of the Drosophila central nervous system. J Cell Sci 126, 3823–3834. 10.1242/jcs.117994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Bauer R et al. (2002) The Drosophila gap junction channel gene innexin 2 controls foregut development in response to Wingless signalling. J Cell Sci 115, 1859–1867. 10.1242/jcs.115.9.1859 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Smendziuk CM et al. (2015) Bi-directional gap junction-mediated soma-germline communication is essential for spermatogenesis. Development 142, 2598–2609. 10.1242/dev.123448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Peters MA et al. (2007) A calcium wave mediated by gap junctions coordinates a rhythmic behavior in C. elegans. Curr Biol 17, 1601–1608. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.McLaughlin KA and Levin M (2018) Bioelectric signaling in regeneration: Mechanisms of ionic controls of growth and form. Dev Biol 433, 177–189. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.08.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Tyler SEB (2017) Nature's Electric Potential: A Systematic Review of the Role of Bioelectricity in Wound Healing and Regenerative Processes in Animals, Humans, and Plants. Front Physiol 8, 627. 10.3389/fphys.2017.00627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Dana H et al. (2019) High-performance calcium sensors for imaging activity in neuronal populations and microcompartments. Nat Methods 16, 649–657. 10.1038/s41592-019-0435-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Simpson JH and Looger LL (2018) Functional Imaging and Optogenetics in Drosophila. Genetics 208, 1291–1309. 10.1534/genetics.117.300228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Chen Y et al. (2022) Ultra-sensitive responsive near-infrared fluorescent nitroreductase probe with strong specificity for imaging tumor and detecting the invasiveness of tumor cells. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 268, 120634. 10.1016/j.saa.2021.120634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Cao G et al. (2013) Genetically targeted optical electrophysiology in intact neural circuits. Cell 154, 904–913. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Grabe V et al. (2020) Odor-Induced Multi-Level Inhibitory Maps in Drosophila. eNeuro 7. 10.1523/ENEURO.0213-19.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Klapoetke NC et al. (2014) Addendum: independent optical excitation of distinct neural populations. Nat Methods 11, 972. 10.1038/nmeth0914-972 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Yagi R et al. (2010) Refined LexA transactivators and their use in combination with the Drosophila Gal4 system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107, 16166–16171. 10.1073/pnas.1005957107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Potter CJ et al. (2010) The Q system: a repressible binary system for transgene expression, lineage tracing, and mosaic analysis. Cell 141, 536–548. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

