Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 18.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2022 May 25;17(3):188–195. doi: 10.1007/s11884-022-00655-6

Women’s Knowledge of Bladder Health: What We Have Learned in the Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (PLUS) Research Consortium

L M Rickey 1, D R Camenga 2, S S Brady 3, B R Williams 4, J F Wyman 5, M A Brault 6, A L Smith 7, D Y LaCoursiere 8, A S James 9, M D Lavender 10, L K Low 11; Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (PLUS) Research Consortium12
PMCID: PMC10195105  NIHMSID: NIHMS1892695  PMID: 37206992

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The goal of this manuscript is to review the current literature on bladder health education, summarize Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (PLUS) [50] findings on environmental factors that influence knowledge and beliefs about toileting and bladder function, and describe how PLUS work will contribute to improved understanding of women’s bladder-related knowledge and inform prevention intervention strategies.

Recent Findings

Analysis of focus group transcripts revealed the various ways women view, experience, and describe bladder function. In the absence of formal bladder health educational platforms, women appear to develop knowledge of normal and abnormal bladder function from a variety of social processes including environmental cues and interpersonal sources. Importantly, focus group participants expressed frustration with the absence of structured bladder education to inform knowledge and practices.

Summary

There is a lack of bladder health educational programming in the USA, and it is unknown to what degree women’s knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs influence their risk of developing lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). The PLUS Consortium RISE FOR HEALTH study will estimate the prevalence of bladder health in adult women and assess risk and protective factors. A Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs (KAB) questionnaire will be administered to determine KAB around bladder function, toileting, and bladder-related behaviors, and examine the relationship of KAB to bladder health and LUTS. The data generated from PLUS studies will identify opportunities for educational strategies to improve bladder health promotion and well-being across the life course.

Keywords: Bladder health, Bladder education, Incontinence prevention, Women’s health, Bladder knowledge, Toileting

Introduction

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are highly prevalent among women in the USA, with profound health, social, and economic implications [1, 2]. In community samples, almost 20% of women who are 30 years and older report moderate-to-severe LUTS [3]. Prevalence and severity of symptoms increase as people age, with 65% of women over 60 years of age reporting a bladder control problem [4]. The cost to society for overactive bladder (OAB) alone has been estimated at over $65 billion per year, with the majority of costs borne by community-dwelling adults [5]. Furthermore, the total annual loss of productivity in the USA due to OAB is estimated to be $1.38 billion [5]. Lower urinary tract symptoms are expected to affect more than 43 million women over the next 30 years; [6] therefore, LUTS impose considerable individual and societal costs that will continue to rise as the population ages.

The majority of LUTS research and clinical practice has focused on treatment of the most affected subsets of women presenting for care and lacks a well-developed evidence base for prevention. Increased awareness of the public health impact of LUTS has highlighted the need for research to inform public health education, bladder health promotion strategies, and primary prevention initiatives [79]. The Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (PLUS) Research Consortium, established by the National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) in 2015, is an example of LUTS research expansion to focus on prevention. PLUS scientists, who represent a wide range of disciplines, are tasked with using a transdisciplinary approach to inform strategies for the prevention of LUTS and the promotion of bladder health in adolescent and adult women across the life span [10••]. PLUS seeks to identify risk and protective factors associated with LUTS and bladder health to inform strategies for future prevention efforts.

As a foundational step, the PLUS Research Consortium developed the following definition of bladder health: “A complete state of physical, mental, and social well-being related to bladder function and not merely the absence of LUTS. Healthy bladder function permits daily activities, adapts to short-term physical or environmental stressors, and allows optimal well-being (e.g., travel, exercise, social, occupational, or other activities) [11••].” This definition broadens the features of health, consistent with the World Health Organization, in recognition that absence of symptoms alone does not constitute health [11••, 12]. Grounded in this definition of bladder health, this paper reviews the literature on bladder health education and knowledge, describes current and ongoing PLUS studies in this area, and articulates PLUS’s vision for future research.

Current Literature on Bladder Health Education

Sparse research exists on the development and implementation of primary prevention education interventions that aim to optimize bladder health in asymptomatic women. Education initiatives delivered by professional and consumer organizations largely focus on secondary or tertiary prevention related to the management of LUTS and bladder conditions (e.g., overactive bladder and incontinence). Evidence to support these strategies has been drawn from systematic reviews or studies which focus on self-management interventions among older women with LUTS and pelvic floor muscle exercises in antenatal and postpartum women [1318]. For example, an early study with a predominantly older female sample found that a 1-h class led to behavioral changes and bladder function improvements [17]. The class provided education on myths, bladder function and symptoms, causes of urinary incontinence, and self-management strategies (e.g., cognitive strategies for managing urgency, pelvic floor muscle exercises, use of absorbent products). The Translating Unique Learning for Incontinence Prevention (TULIP) trial found that both a 2-h group class and viewing a 20-min video on anatomy, incontinence, pelvic floor muscle exercises, and fluid/dietary topics were equally effective in preventing urinary incontinence among women aged 55 and over [18].

Several trials have examined the effect of group-based bladder health education or pelvic floor fitness programs on LUTS improvement in symptomatic older women [16, 1824]. The Group Learning Achieves Decreased Incidents of Lower Urinary Symptoms (GLADIOLUS) trial found that women aged 55 and over with LUTS who participated in a 2-h bladder health and self-management session had significant improvement in ICIQ-SF scores as compared to a control group [16]. In a randomized controlled trial of women 60 years and older with incontinence at least once weekly, a continence promotion workshop in combination with self-management strategies related to weight, pelvic floor strength, caffeine intake, smoking, and constipation was more effective in improving LUTS than either intervention alone [23]. A trial of a 6-week toileting behavior education program that addressed urinary tract anatomy, micturition, and healthy toileting behaviors in a predominantly female population with OAB and type 2 diabetes resulted in a higher adoption of healthy toileting behaviors and improvement of urinary symptoms 6 months post-intervention compared to routine care alone [24]. Taken together, these studies demonstrate the potential role for larger scale education programs on bladder function and bladder-related behaviors in both primary prevention and treatment of LUTS.

To be optimally effective, primary prevention interventions should be delivered to younger, asymptomatic women. There are very few studies examining educational strategies for adolescent girls. A novel 6-week pelvic health curriculum delivered in US urban schools to adolescent females covered topics such as cultural views of the female pelvis, pelvic anatomy and function, the importance of pelvic health, pelvic hygiene, LUTS, and help-seeking [25]. Knowledge deficits measured by the Adolescent Bladder and Pelvic Health Questionnaire were reduced as a result of the intervention [25]. The adolescent girls were initially reticent to talk about bladder health issues but opened up quickly with tools like Pelvic Health Bingo that introduced content using levity and game-based learning [26]. Additionally, discussions were robust when it was clear the environment was confidential and safe for any related questions [26].

Globally, there are common challenges related to bladder education that may provide learning opportunities for shared intervention strategies. Menstrual health and hygiene is a key area for introducing LUTS education among adolescent girls and young women worldwide, as this is a life stage where young women become more aware of toilet availability and infrastructure [27, 28]. There are unique aspects influencing bladder health in low and middle income countries (LMICs) including inadequate sanitation and lack of privacy, making toileting inherently stressful for adolescent girls in these environments [2932]. Incontinence related to childbirth, including obstetric fistula, can be highly stigmatizing for women in LMICs, which may present a barrier to bladder health and LUTS education, although more recent literature suggests that treatment and knowledge is increasing in some communities [33, 34]. There is a small collection of literature describing the ways in which water, sanitation, and hygiene programs (commonly abbreviated as “WASH”) would benefit from a gendered approach, as cisgender girls and women have different toileting needs than cisgender boys and men that must be considered in the construction and location of latrines/toilets [3539].

In summary, little research to date has focused on primary prevention of LUTS and the promotion of bladder health. As a first step to building prevention strategies and impactful educational programming, it is essential to know what women know. Throughout the life course, a crucial source of knowledge is experience; therefore, it is important to understand women’s lived experience of bladder function. It is equally important to explore women’s views of bladder health and their perceptions of what constitutes barriers to healthy behaviors. Understanding women’s experiences and perspectives will help us identify the context of bladder health and bladder risk behaviors and select appropriate strategies and channels for achieving behavior change. In the next sections, we will describe what we have learned in PLUS about women’s perceptions and experiences with bladder health and LUTS. We will also describe ongoing work within PLUS that aims to better understand women’s knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs around bladder health; sources of bladder education; and desired bladder health education content and platforms.

PLUS and LURN Qualitative Studies: Perception and Beliefs About Bladder Function

PLUS and the Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network (LURN) are both NIDDK-sponsored research networks that were established to reduce the burden of LUTS and advance the understanding of individual experiences related to bladder function [40]. However, while PLUS focuses on bladder health and LUTS prevention among women, LURN goals include improved measurement of patient experiences of LUTS and identifying important subtypes of LUTS in women and men.

The first study launched by PLUS was the Study of Habits, Attitudes, Realities and Experiences (SHARE), which examined perceptions of the bladder among adolescent and adult women without recognized LUTS or history of LUTS treatment. SHARE was a multi-site qualitative focus group study that included 360 participants ranging in age from 11 to 93 years [41••]. Analyses of focus groups transcripts from the SHARE study and individual interviews conducted within the LURN network have revealed the various ways women view, experience, and describe bladder function. In the absence of formal bladder health educational platforms, women appear to develop knowledge of normal and abnormal bladder function from a variety of social processes including environmental cues and interpersonal sources. Key among these are the processes of conversing with others about bladder practices [42], observing bladder behavior [43], navigating the toileting environment [44], and delineating what constitutes normal bladder function [45].

The social process of conversing with others about bladder function primarily occurs within family and friendship groups and focuses on exchanging information about perceived normal function and providing advice about abnormal bladder function. Such conversations can become mechanisms for normalizing LUTS. Across the life course, conversations about bladder function vary by topic. Adolescents and young adult women often share information about the impact of sexual behavior, pregnancy, or childbirth on bladder health, while middle-aged and older adult women talk about the effect of menopause and the aging process on bladder function [42]. For example, women discussed the belief that urinating after sex will prevent UTIs as well as their perceptions of the causal relationship between reproductive processes and bladder health. However, dissemination of lay theories about bladder function runs the risk of spreading information about symptoms and treatments without a scientific evidence base and may also serve to normalize negative outcomes (e.g., incontinence after childbirth).

The social cognitive process of observing bladder behavior consists of three overlapping practices that inform community-dwelling women’s knowledge and understanding of bladder function and practices: self-observation, observation of others, and being aware of being observed by others [43]. Observing one’s own bladder behavior facilitates women’s understanding of what is normal for them and alerts them to changes in bladder function that may indicate a problem (e.g., more frequent urination, darker urine). Observing others’ bladder practices in educational, occupational, social, and home settings exposes girls and women to social expectations about bladder function and influences their perception of what is normative and appropriate. The perception of being observed by others can lead to increased awareness of one’s toileting practices and engender behavior changes as a form of self-regulation to better fit within social norms or expectations. In school classrooms or occupational settings, voiding norms that discourage “voiding on urge” can be harmful if they lead to restricted hydration or delayed voiding (holding). Conversely, in a family environment with healthy voiding practices, young people can benefit from the exposure that will shape their toileting behaviors overall.

Women learn about bladder health through their experiences navigating toilet access in a variety of environments. A secondary analysis of individual interviews of women with LUTS conducted by the LURN found that accessing public toilet facilities imposes temporal constraints on toileting practices and shapes women’s assumptions about normal bladder function outside of the home environment [44]. Accessing toilets in schools, workplaces, and public spaces also affects toileting knowledge among asymptomatic women. SHARE found that across settings and age groups, toilet access in the USA was restricted by “gatekeepers” (i.e., individuals who control access to toilets). For adolescent women, gatekeepers were almost universally present in schools, whereas adult women had variable experiences with gatekeepers in workplaces or public settings. Teachers, managers, and store employees were identified as gatekeepers. As a result of this gatekeeping, adolescent and adult women described how it was considered normative that they are expected to hold urine when they are in public spaces. Other factors which led to intentional delayed voiding included internalized norms to prioritize school and job responsibilities over voiding, and lack of cleanliness in public toilets. Participants noted disparities in the ease of accessing toilets between men and women, including longer lines for women related to their menstruation needs, clothing differences, and increased experience of LUTS.

The PLUS-supported study, SHARE-MORE (Sexual and Gender Minority Opinions, Realities and Experience), found additional disparities in toilet access between cisgender and sexual and gender minority individuals. An analysis of 6 focus groups with 36 individuals from SHARE-MORE found that sexual and gender minority individuals feel the gendered bathroom culture and infrastructure is restrictive and anxiety-inducing [46]. Both gender norms and structural policies limit the individual’s ability to void when needed. Furthermore, bathrooms can be sites of discrimination and violence for trans individuals [46, 47].

Women define what constitutes normal bladder function based on their experiences and perceptions. The SHARE focus group participants often identified normal bladder function and bladder health as the absence of symptoms. Initial responses to the question “What is a healthy bladder?” consisted primarily of descriptions of symptoms of an unhealthy bladder (urinary tract infections, leakage) [48]. Participants described the concept of a healthy bladder as one you did not need to think about, but that did require effort to maintain. Exemplars of what was necessary to maintain bladder health included fluid intake (too much or too little), frequency of voiding (either voiding too frequently or “holding” too often), and being able to generally participate in age-related activities. Participants were frustrated by the lack of systematic information to guide their understanding of what was “right” and what constituted healthy habits to optimize bladder function.

An analysis of LURN individual interviews of adult women with LUTS explored women’s understanding of what constitutes normal bladder function [49]. Participant views of “normal” were based on several aspects of bladder function. A key theme was that voiding should occur as a seamless process, beginning with an urge sensation, followed by voiding with ease and to completion, and then “being done.” Features of normal bladder function also included voiding regularity, which constituted voiding frequency, intervals, and patterns during the day and night. The notion of having control in terms of not leaking urine, as well as the ability to hold urine and defer urination also figured into the perception of normal bladder function. Similar to the SHARE study on healthy bladder, interviews conducted by the LURN offered views of normal bladder function that encompassed both the absence of symptoms and the positive impact of being symptom-free in day-to-day life, including not having to think about or worry about the bladder or limit daily activities.

These large-scale qualitative studies conducted by the PLUS Consortium and LURN not only offer insights into women’s knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs concerning bladder health, but also identify gaps in both scientific and popular understanding of what constitutes a healthy bladder and how LUTS may be prevented.

Current PLUS Studies: Examining Women’s Bladder Health Knowledge and Education

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs (KAB) Measurement Development

Building upon work from SHARE and LURN, a current focus within the PLUS Research Consortium is developing an instrument to evaluate bladder health KAB in adult women across the life course. These beliefs likely influence daily toileting and bladder-related behaviors across the lifespan, and therefore have potential to significantly impact bladder health and risk of LUTS. Initial instrument development included (1) identifying peer-reviewed research articles that assessed KAB about bladder health or LUTS; (2) extracting KAB questions that were asked of female participants; and (3) cataloging articles for the presence of PLUS KAB research priorities (pelvic floor musculature, pregnancy and childbirth, influence of others on KAB, beliefs about toileting practices), bladder function (storage, emptying, bioregulatory processes), constructs from the Theory of Planned Behavior (attitudes, perceived norms, perceived control), and other conceptual constructs (knowledge, beliefs). Based on these initial activities, the study team concluded that there was not an available validated questionnaire to measure bladder health KAB.

The team then went on to build an inventory of items for a KAB questionnaire that includes the following domains: overall bladder health knowledge (e.g., basic anatomy), pregnancy and childbirth (e.g., impact on bladder function, LUTS prevention strategies), pelvic floor (e.g., pelvic muscle and Kegel exercises), and Theory of Planned Behavior-informed attitudes and beliefs about specific behaviors (e.g., fluid intake, voiding in relation to urge). For the initial core module, q-sort methodology and e-panel assessment were used to reduce relevant items for a 17-item KAB instrument that was then further evaluated through cognitive interviewing. Final refinement was achieved through content-expert review, community-member feedback, and cross-cultural assessment. Additional items developed by the KAB work group for its inventory are being further developed, evaluated, and included in subsequent PLUS data collection efforts.

Bladder Health and Public Health Messaging

Women’s recommendations for public health messaging including approaches, formats, and context are currently being analyzed from SHARE focus group data. Areas of opportunity being explored include bladder health educational content in K-12 school curricula and preferred strategies for bladder health promotion programming across the life course and during specific developmental phases (e.g., puberty, pregnancy). Women’s suggestions for locations of bladder health campaigns as well as use of social medial platforms are also being reviewed from the focus group transcripts.

Conclusions and Future Directions for PLUS Research

Additional studies are critical to advance the bladder health knowledge and education scientific literature. Findings from past PLUS studies have informed the design and planning of the “RISE FOR HEALTH” study, which aims to estimate the prevalence of bladder health in adult women and assess risk and protective factors for bladder health. Including KAB measures alongside other sociodemographic variables will allow for more tailored educational strategies that consider socio-contextual factors. Novel associations between women’s bladder knowledge and beliefs and their bladder health will be examined in this study, providing a foundation for future interventions. The data generated from PLUS studies will expand the evidence base concerning knowledge about bladder health among women in the USA, offering new opportunities to improve health and well-being across the life course.

Acknowledgements

Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (PLUS) Research Consortium

Research Centers and Investigators

Loyola University Chicago—Maywood, IL (U01DK106898) Multi-Principal

Investigators: Linda Brubaker, MD; Elizabeth R. Mueller, MD, MSME

Investigators: Marian Acevedo-Alvarez, MD; Colleen M. Fitzgerald, MD, MS; Cecilia T. Hardacker, MSN, RN, CNL; Jeni Hebert-Beirne, PhD, MPH; Missy Lavender, MBA; David A. Shoham, PhD, MSPH.

Northwestern University—Chicago IL (U01DK126045)

Multi-Principal Investigators: Kimberly Sue Kenton, MD; James W. Griffith, PhD; Melissa Simon, MD, MPH

Investigator: Patricia I Moreno, PhD.

University of Alabama at Birmingham—Birmingham, AL (U01DK106858)

Principal Investigator: Alayne D. Markland, DO, MSc

Investigators: Tamera Coyne-Beasley, MD, MPH, FAAP, FSAHM; Kathryn L. Burgio, PhD; Cora E. Lewis, MD, MSPH; Gerald McGwin, Jr., MS, PhD; Camille P. Vaughan, MD, MS; Beverly Rosa Williams, PhD.

University of California San Diego—La Jolla, CA (U01DK106827)

Principal Investigator: Emily S. Lukacz, MD

Investigators: Sheila Gahagan, MD, MPH; D. Yvette LaCoursiere, MD, MPH; Jesse Nodora, DrPH.

University of Michigan—Ann Arbor, MI (U01DK106893)

Principal Investigator: Janis M. Miller, PhD, APRN, FAAN

Investigators: Lawrence Chin-I An, MD; Lisa Kane Low, PhD, CNM, FACNM, FAAN.

University of Minnesota (Scientific and Data Coordinating Center)—Minneapolis MN (U24DK106786)

Multi-Principal Investigators: Bernard L. Harlow, PhD; Kyle D. Rudser, PhD

Investigators: Sonya S. Brady, PhD; Haitao Chu, MD, PhD; Melissa L. Constantine, PhD, MPAff; Cynthia S. Fok, MD, MPH; Peter Scal, PhD; Todd Rockwood, PhD.

University of Pennsylvania – Philadelphia, PA (U01DK106892)

Principal Investigator: Multi-Principal Investigators: Diane K. Newman, DNP FAAN; Ariana L. Smith, MD

Investigators: Amanda Berry, MSN, CRNP; C. Neill Epperson, MD; Heather Klusaritz, PhD, MSW; Kathryn H. Schmitz, PhD, MPH, FACSM, FTOS; Ann E. Stapleton, MD; Jean F. Wyman, PhD.

Washington University in St. Louis—Saint Louis, MO (U01DK106853)

Principal Investigator: Siobhan Sutcliffe, PhD, ScM, MHS

Investigators: Aimee S. James, PhD, MPH; Jerry L. Lowder, MD, MSc; Melanie R. Meister, MD, MSCI.

Yale University—New Haven, CT (U01DK106908)

Principal Investigator: Leslie M. Rickey, MD, MPH

Investigators: Marie A. Brault, PhD (Dec. 2020-); Deepa R. Camenga, MD, MHS; Shayna D. Cunningham, PhD.

Steering Committee Chair: Linda Brubaker, MD. UCSD, San Diego. (January 2021-)

NIH Program Office: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Division of Kidney, Urologic, and Hematologic Diseases, Bethesda, MD.

NIH Project Scientist: Julia Barthold, MD; Past project scientist: Tamara Bavendam MD, MS (July 2017–Jan 2020)

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) by cooperative agreements (grants U24DK106786, U01 DK106853, U01 DK106858, U01 DK106898, U01 DK106893, U01 DK106827, U01 DK106908, U01 DK106892, U01 DK126045). Additional funding from National Institute on Aging, NIH Office of Research on Women’s Health.

Footnotes

Disclaimer

The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Declarations

Conflict of Interest S.S. Brady reports grants from 1 U24DK106786, during the conduct of the study.

B.R Williams reports grants from NIH-NIDDK, during the conduct of the study.

J.F. Wyman reports grants from National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disorders/National Institutes of Health, during the conduct of the study.

A.S. James reports grants from NIH, during the conduct of the study; grants from NCI, outside the submitted work.

M.A. Brault reports grant K01TW011480 from the Fogarty International Center at NIH, outside the submitted work.

L.M. Rickey, D.R. Camenga, A.L. Smith, D.Y. LaCoursiere, M.D. Lavender, and L.K. Low declare that they have no conflict of interest. Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (PLUS) Research Consortium declare no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors. All reported studies/experiments with human or animal subjects performed by the authors have been previously published and complied with all applicable ethical standards (including the Helsinki declaration and its amendments, institutional/national research committee standards, and international/national/institutional guidelines).

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:

Of importance

••

Of major importance

References

  • 1.Irwin DE, Milsom I, Hunskaar S, Reilly K, Kopp Z, Herschorn S, et al. Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIC study. Eur Urol 2006;50(6):1306–14 (discussion 14–5). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Coyne KS, Sexton CC, Bell JA, Thompson CL, Dmochowski R, Bavendam T, et al. The prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and overactive bladder (OAB) by racial/ethnic group and age: results from OAB-POLL. Neurourol Urodyn 2013;32(3):230–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kupelian V, Wei JT, O’Leary MP, Kusek JW, Litman HJ, Link CL, et al. Prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms and effect on quality of life in a racially and ethnically diverse random sample: the Boston Area Community Health (BACH) Survey. Arch Intern Med 2006;166(21):2381–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trøndelag. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53(11):1150–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ganz ML, Smalarz AM, Krupski TL, Anger JT, Hu JC, Wittrup-Jensen KU, et al. Economic costs of overactive bladder in the United States. Urology 2010;75(3):526–32e1-18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wu JM, Hundley AF, Fulton RG, Myers ER. Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women: 2010 to 2050. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114(6):1278–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Palmer MH, Cockerell R, Griebling TL, Rantell A, van Houten P, Newman DK. Review of the 6th International Consultation on Incontinence: primary prevention of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2020;39(1):66–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lukacz ES, Sampselle C, Gray M, Macdiarmid S, Rosenberg M, Ellsworth P, et al. A healthy bladder: a consensus statement. Int J Clin Pract 2011;65(10):1026–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ellsworth P, Marschall-Kehrel D, King S, Lukacz E. Bladder health across the life course. Int J Clin Pract 2013;67(5):397–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Harlow BL, Bavendam TG, Palmer MH, Brubaker L, Burgio KL, Lukacz ES, et al. The Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (PLUS) Research Consortium: a transdisciplinary approach toward promoting bladder health and preventing lower urinary tract symptoms in women across the life course. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2018;27(3):283–9. Foundational paper that explains PLUS approach to studying bladder health promotion and LUTS prevention compared to traditional disease-based paradigm.
  • 11. Lukacz ES, Bavendam TG, Berry A, Fok CS, Gahagan S, Goode PS, et al. A novel research definition of bladder health in women and girls: implications for research and public health promotion. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2018;27(8):974–81. Describes the process used to develop a bladder health definition that considers functional impact beyond absence of symptoms and defines bladder functions from a health standpoint.
  • 12.WH Organization. Constitution of the World Health Organization Basic Documents Fouth-fifth. Geneva: WHO; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fu Y, Nelson EA, McGowan L. Multifaceted self-management interventions for older women with urinary incontinence: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMJ Open 2019;9(8):e028626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Woodley SJ, Lawrenson P, Boyle R, Cody JD, Mørkved S, Kernohan A, et al. Pelvic floor muscle training for preventing and treating urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women. Cochrane Database Systemat Rev 2020;5(5):CD007471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Low LK, Miller JM, Guo Y, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO, Sampselle CM. Spontaneous pushing to prevent postpartum urinary incontinence: a randomized, controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J 2013;24(3):453–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Diokno AC, Newman DK, Low LK, Griebling TL, Maddens ME, Goode PS, et al. Effect of group-administered behavioral treatment on urinary incontinence in older women: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2018;178(10):1333–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schirm V, Baumgardner J, Dowd T, Gregor S, Kolcaba K. Development of a healthy bladder education program for older adults. Geriatr Nurs 2004;25(5):301–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sampselle CM, Newman DK, Miller JM, Kirk K, DiCamillo MA, Wagner TH, et al. A randomized controlled trial to compare 2 scalable interventions for lower urinary tract symptom prevention: main outcomes of the TULIP Study. J Urol 2017;197(6):1480–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dugan SA, Lavender MD, Hebert-Beirne J, Brubaker L. A pelvic floor fitness program for older women with urinary symptoms: a feasibility study. PM R 2013;5(8):672–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tannenbaum C, Fritel X, Halme A, van den Heuvel E, Jutai J, Wagg A. Long-term effect of community-based continence promotion on urinary symptoms, falls and healthy active life expectancy among older women: cluster randomised trial. Age Ageing 2019;48(4):526–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.So A, De Gagne JC, Park S. Long-term effects of a self-management program for older women with urinary incontinence in rural Korea: a comparison cohort study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2019;46(1):55–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Brown HW, Braun EJ, Wise ME, Myers S, Li Z, Sampene E, et al. Small-group, community-member intervention for urinary and bowel incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2019;134(3):600–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Tannenbaum C, Agnew R, Benedetti A, Thomas D, van den Heuvel E. Effectiveness of continence promotion for older women via community organisations: a cluster randomised trial. BMJ Open 2013;3(12):e004135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Xu D, Huang L, Gao J, Li J, Wang X, Wang K. Effects of an education program on toileting behaviors and bladder symptoms in overactive bladder patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Nurs Stud 2018;87:131–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hebert-Beirne JM, O’Conor R, Ihm JD, Parlier MK, Lavender MD, Brubaker L. A pelvic health curriculum in school settings: the effect on adolescent females’ knowledge. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2017;30(2):188–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lavender MD. School pelvic health curriculum feedback, person communication, May 11, 2021
  • 27.Hennegan J, Shannon AK, Rubli J, Schwab KJ, Melendez-Torres GJ. Women’s and girls’ experiences of menstruation in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and qualitative metasynthesis. PLoS medicine 2019;16(5):e1002803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Garg S, Sharma N, Sahay R. Socio-cultural aspects of menstruation in an urban slum in Delhi, India. Reprod Health Matters 2001;9(17):16–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.McCammon E, Bansal S, Hebert LE, Yan S, Menendez A, Gilliam M. Exploring young women’s menstruation-related challenges in Uttar Pradesh, India, using the socio-ecological framework. Sex Reprod Health Matters 2020;28(1):1749342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gold-Watts A, Hovdenak M, Daniel M, Gandhimathi S, Sudha R, Bastien S. A qualitative study of adolescent girls’ experiences of menarche and menstruation in rural Tamil Nadu, India. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2020;15(1):1845924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Boosey R, Prestwich G, Deave T. Menstrual hygiene management amongst schoolgirls in the Rukungiri district of Uganda and the impact on their education: a cross-sectional study. Pan Afr Med J 2014;19:253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Khanna A, Goyal RS, Bhawsar R. Menstrual practices and reproductive problems: a study of adolescent girls in Rajasthan. J Health Manag 2005;7(1):91–107. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chen CCG, Jiao J, Mbabazi G, Long A, Galvao R, Rwabizi D, et al. The changing perception and knowledge of obstetric fistula: a qualitative study. Int Urogynecol J 2020;31(11):2419–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lavender T, Wakasiaka S, McGowan L, Moraa M, Omari J, Khisa W. Secrecy inhibits support: a grounded theory of community perspectives of women suffering from obstetric fistula, in Kenya. Midwifery 2016;42:54–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Caruso BA, Cooper HLF, Haardörfer R, Yount KM, Routray P, Torondel B, et al. The association between women’s sanitation experiences and mental health: a cross-sectional study in Rural, Odisha India. SSM Popul Health 2018;5:257–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Caruso BA, Clasen TF, Hadley C, Yount KM, Haardörfer R, Rout M, et al. Understanding and defining sanitation insecurity: women’s gendered experiences of urination, defecation and menstruation in rural Odisha, India. BMJ Global Health 2017;2(4):e000414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Saleem M, Burdett T, Heaslip V. Health and social impacts of open defecation on women: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 2019;19(1):158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.O’Reilly K Combining sanitation and women’s participation in water supply: an example from Rajasthan. Dev Pract 2010;20(1):45–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.O’Reilly K From toilet insecurity to toilet security: creating safe sanitation for women and girls. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 2016;3(1):19–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yang CC, Weinfurt KP, Merion RM, Kirkali Z. Symptoms of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction Research Network. J Urol 2016;196(1):146–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Low LK, Williams BR, Camenga DR, Hebert-Beirne J, Brady SS, Newman DK, et al. Prevention of lower urinary tract symptoms research consortium focus group study of habits, attitudes, realities, and experiences of bladder fealth. J Adv Nurs 2019;75(11):3111–3125. Foundational PLUS study that explored adolescent and adult women’s experiences, perceptions, beliefs, knowledge, and behaviors related to bladder health across the life course using focus group methodology.
  • 42.Williams BR, Nodora J, Newman DK, Kane Low L, James AS, Camenga DR, et al. I never knew anyone who peed on themselves on purpose: exploring adolescent and adult women’s lay language and discourse about bladder health and function. Neurourol Urodyn 2020;39(1):225–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hebert-Beirne J, Camenga DR, James AS, Brady SS, Newman DK, Burgio KL, et al. Social processes informing toileting behavior among adolescent and adult women: social cognitive theory as an interpretative lens. Qual Health Res 2021;31(3):430–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Camenga DR, Brady SS, Hardacker CT, Williams BR, Hebert-Beirne J, James AS, et al. U.S. adolescent and adult women’s experiences accessing and using toilets in schools, workplaces, and public spaces: a multi-site focus group study to inform future research in bladder health. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16(18):3338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Low L, Williams B, Newman D, Camenga D, Brady S, Hebert-Beirne J, et al. Bladder Health Focus Group Study: The Prevention of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (PLUS) Research Consortium Study of Habits, Attitudes, Realities and Experiences (SHARE) American Public Health Association Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hardacker CT, Baccellieri A, Mueller ER, Brubaker L, Hutchins G, Zhang JLY, et al. Bladder health experiences, perceptions and knowledge of sexual and gender minorities. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16(17):3170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Murchison GR, Agénor M, Reisner SL, Watson RJ. School restroom and locker room restrictions and sexual assault risk among transgender youth. Pediatrics 2019;143(6):2902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Low LK, Williams BR, Newman DK, Hebert-Beirne J, Camenga DR, Brady SS, et al. , editors. Bladder health: moving from absence of symptoms to harmony: “If your bladder’s unhealthy that means you’re unhealthy” AUGS 44th Annual Scientific Meeting Abstract Supplement; October 8–10, 2020; PFD Week 2020: The Virtual Experience; 2020; Online: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Burgio KL, James AS, LaCoursiere DY, Mueller ER, Newman DK, Low LK, et al. Views of normal bladder function among women experiencing lower urinary tract symptoms. Urology 2021;150:103–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Low L, Williams B, Camenga D, et al. Bladder health focus group study: the prevention of lower urinary tract symptoms (PLUS) research consortium study of habits, attitudes, realities and experiences (SHARE) Am Public Health Assoc Annual Meeting. Philadelphia PA. 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES