Skip to main content
Public Health Nutrition logoLink to Public Health Nutrition
. 2020 May 11;24(6):1393–1403. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019005202

Cross-country comparison of dietary patterns and overweight and obesity among adult women in urban Sub-Saharan Africa

Lilia Bliznashka 1,*, Goodarz Danaei 1, Günther Fink 2,3, Valerie L Flax 4, Chrissie Thakwalakwa 5, Lindsay M Jaacks 1
PMCID: PMC10195588  PMID: 32390577

Abstract

Objective:

To derive dietary patterns (DP) among women of reproductive age (WRA) and older women in urban Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), and to examine their association with body mass index (BMI), overweight and obesity.

Design:

We used principal component analysis to derive DP. Their association with BMI, overweight and obesity was assessed using linear and multinomial logistic regression models controlling for age, marital status, education and wealth.

Setting:

Cross-sectional data from prospective studies in Accra, Ghana (2008–2009), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (2014) and Lilongwe and Kasungu, Malawi (2017–2018) were used.

Participants:

We compared WRA in Ghana (18–54 years, n 1762) and Malawi (19–48 years, n 137), and older women in Ghana (≥55 years, n 514) and Tanzania (≥50 years, n 134).

Results:

Among WRA, protein and healthy DP were identified in both Ghana and Malawi. In Ghana, the protein DP was associated with higher odds of overweight or obesity (adjusted OR 1·82, 95 % CI 1·27, 2·60 for quintile 2). Among older women, three DP were identified in Ghana (cereal, protein and healthy) and two DP in Tanzania (protein and healthy). The protein DP was associated with higher BMI in Ghana (adjusted mean difference 2·83, 95 % CI 0·95, 4·71 for quartile 3).

Conclusions:

Higher quintiles of the protein DP were associated with higher BMI and odds of overweight or obesity among women in urban Ghana, but not in Malawi or Tanzania. Further research is needed to understand how DP influence overweight and obesity among adult women in urban SSA.

Keywords: Obesity, Overweight, Sub-Saharan Africa, Dietary patterns, Women of reproductive age, Older women


Over the past few decades, the prevalence of overweight and obesity has been increasing globally, with particularly high increases in low- and middle-income countries(1). In Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), most countries are in the first stage of the obesity transition, with a higher prevalence of overweight and obesity among women than men(2), among those with higher socio-economic status (SES)(2) and among those in urban compared with rural settings(3). Despite substantial increases in rural body mass index (BMI), rising BMI among women in urban SSA remains one of the main drivers of the obesity epidemic in the region(4). In Ghana, Malawi and Tanzania, the countries of focus in the present study, the prevalence of overweight or obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) among adult women ≥20 years of age was 38·4, 25·7 and 38·5 % in 2013, respectively(1). Among women of reproductive age (WRA) living in urban areas, overweight or obesity prevalence ranged from a low of 36·2 % in Malawi in 2015–2016(5) to a high of 49·0 % in Ghana in 2014(6). The prevalence in Tanzania in 2015–2016 was 41·6 %(7), close to Ghana’s. Estimates of the prevalence of overweight and obesity among older women are lacking, but they are likely similar to those for adult women in general. In 2017, high BMI accounted for 16·2, 8·3 and 11·6 % of disability-adjusted life years among women 50–69 years in Ghana, Malawi and Tanzania, respectively, a larger contribution compared with WRA(8).

Dietary patterns (DP) are a useful way to describe overall diets and eating behaviour that takes advantage of the correlation of nutrients and foods, and the potential synergistic and cumulative effects of multiple nutrients on obesity and chronic disease. In addition, DP parallel real-world consumption of foods and may therefore be easier to interpret and translate by the general public, potentially improving the development of and adherence to food-based dietary guidelines and recommendations(9).

Many studies have looked at DP in high-income countries and their relationship with obesity, particularly among women(1018). Despite the heterogeneity among studies, they generally find that healthier, in many cases more traditional, DP characterised by higher intakes of vegetables, fruits and reduced-fat foods are associated with a lower prevalence of overweight and obesity, while modern or Western DP, characterised by higher intakes of meat and fried foods, are associated with a higher prevalence of overweight and obesity(1117). However, less is known about DP among adult women in urban SSA and their relationship with BMI, overweight and obesity.

Few studies have previously characterised DP in SSA(1931). The majority of these studies were small, focusing on rural areas, specific populations or narrow age groups, for example, adolescents in South Africa(23), defence forces in Cameroon(24) and secondary school students in Tanzania(22). Only six of these studies have examined DP among adult women in urban areas in Benin(29), Botswana(25), Burkina Faso(30), Cameroon(24), Ghana(31) and Tanzania(21). Of the six studies, only one described DP among the elderly (≥60 years)(25). The association between DP and overweight among women was assessed only in Burkina Faso(30). The authors identified two DP: a snacking DP, characterised by frequent food consumption outside of main meals, and a modern DP, characterised by modern foods and preparation methods (e.g., scrambled eggs, pasta, cheese and soda, among others). They found that the modern, but not the snacking, DP was associated with a higher prevalence of overweight(30).

Given the rising prevalence of obesity among women in urban SSA, and limited evidence on DP and their association with BMI, overweight and obesity in this population, the objectives of the current study were to: (1) derive and characterise DP among WRA and older women in urban settings in SSA – Accra, Ghana; Lilongwe and Kasungu, Malawi and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and (2) examine the association between DP and BMI, overweight and obesity.

Methods

Ghana study

We used data from the Women’s Health Study of Accra Wave II conducted in Accra, Ghana between October 2008 and June 2009. Details on the study design, sampling and administration have been previously published(32). Briefly, Women’s Health Study of Accra Wave II was the second wave of a community-based longitudinal study of women’s health aiming to quantify the burden of disease among adult women living in Accra, Ghana. A representative sample of women ≥18 years of age usually resident in Accra was drawn for the first wave in 2003, stratified by SES of the enumeration area of residence and age group (18–24, 25–34, 35–54 and 55+ years). Older women were oversampled to ensure statistical power. In 2008–2009, a total of 2814 women ≥18 years of age from all 195 enumeration areas were interviewed. Written informed consent was obtained by fieldworkers who provided information about the study to each participant.

A twenty-five-section quantitative household questionnaire was used to collect information on women’s socio-economic and demographic characteristics, general health and diet. Additional sections administered in line with the primary objective of the study are described elsewhere(32). Height and weight were directly assessed by trained female fieldworkers. Women wore lightweight clothing and no shoes for the assessment. Height was measured to the nearest 0·1 cm using a Shorr height board. Weight was measured to the nearest 0·1 kg using a calibrated Fazzini scale. Finally, women’s diet was assessed using a locally adapted modified non-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) of the previous day. Respondents were asked if they consumed each of twenty-one individual foods or food groups in the past 24 h. Portion sizes and frequencies of intake were not collected.

Malawi study

The Malawi sample came from a study on the drivers of food choice among mothers (19–48 years) with children 6–59 months of age in the Lilongwe and Kasungu Districts in the Central Region of Malawi. The study purposefully sampled three types of mother–child pairs: overweight mothers with an overweight child, overweight mothers with a normal weight child and normal weight mothers with an overweight child. The primary objectives of the study were to compare the dietary intake of mothers and children in the three types of mother–child pairs and to identify and explain predictors of dietary intake and food choice. We used data on 138 mothers living in urban areas (n 68 in Lilongwe and n 70 in Kasungu). Trained fieldworkers obtained written informed consent from each participant.

Quantitative household questionnaires collected information on women’s socio-economic and demographic characteristics and diet, among other outcomes related to the primary objectives of the study. Fieldworkers assessed height and weight directly. Height was measured to the nearest 0·1 cm using a portable stadiometer (Seca 213). Weight was measured to the nearest 0·1 kg using a digital scale (Seca 803). Women wore lightweight clothing and no shoes for the assessment. Finally, women’s diet was assessed using a quantitative locally adapted FFQ, previously developed and validated for use among low-literate populations in South Africa(33). Respondents were given pictures of 147 individual foods and asked to sort them into three piles based on how frequently they consumed each food in the past 7 d: ‘rarely or never’, ‘less frequently, occasionally’ or ‘regularly’. Next, for regularly consumed foods, information on the frequency (number of times consumed in the past 7 d), quantity (weight in grams measured on an electronic kitchen scale using actual foods or water/dry rice as proxies) and typical preparation method was collected.

Tanzania study

Data from the Dar es Salaam Urban Cohort Hypertension Study (DUCS-HTN) were used. Details on DUCS-HTN have been previously published(3436). In brief, DUCS-HTN was a prospective cohort study conducted in two (out of seven) randomly selected neighbourhoods in the Ukonga Ward of Dar es Salaam. A total of 2290 adults ≥40 years living in these two neighbourhoods were enrolled in the study in March–June 2014. The primary objectives of the study were to determine the prevalence of hypertension in Dar es Salaam, its risk factors and the barriers to diagnosis and treatment. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Trained fieldworkers administered quantitative household questionnaires and conducted physical examinations in participants’ homes. The household questionnaires collected information on socio-economic and demographic characteristics, general health and diet, among other information relevant to the primary objectives of the study. Height and weight were directly assessed during the at-home physical examination. Height was measured to the nearest 1 cm. Weight was measured to the nearest 0·1 kg using a digital scale (Seca). Participants wore minimal clothing and no shoes for the assessment.

A dietary sub-study was conducted among 415 participants, 252 of whom were women. Diet was assessed using a locally adapted semi-quantitative FFQ with 179 food items, specified portion sizes and a recall period of 30 d. Portion sizes and frequencies were collected for each food. The frequency categories in reference to the pre-specified portion size for each food were: ‘never’, ‘1–3 per month’, ‘1 per week’, ‘2–4 per week’, ‘5–6 per week’, ‘1 per d’, ‘2–3 per d’, ‘4–5 per d’ and ‘6+ per d’. Further details on the FFQ and its validity are described elsewhere(34).

Sample size

We constructed four analytical samples for our analyses. For the first comparison of WRA (referred to as the WRA comparison from hereon), we used data from Ghana and Malawi. The samples were restricted to women 18–54 years in Ghana (n 1877) and women 19–48 years in Malawi (n 138). In the Ghana sample, pregnant women (n 73) and women with missing data on BMI (n 13), diet (n 9) and education (n 10) were excluded. The final sample of WRA in Ghana consisted of 1762 women. In the Malawi sample, one woman with missing age was excluded, leaving us with a final sample size of 137 WRA.

For the second comparison of older women (referred to as the older women comparison from hereon), data from Ghana and Tanzania were used. The samples were restricted to women ≥55 years in Ghana (n 559) and women ≥50 years in Tanzania (n 138). In the Ghanaian sample, thirty-three women with missing BMI data, six women with missing diet data and six women with missing education data were excluded. The final sample size of older women in Ghana was 514. We excluded four women from the Tanzania sample: one with missing diet data and three with missing household wealth data. The final sample size in Tanzania was 134.

Measures

BMI was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height (m) squared. A categorical variable was created with the following BMI categories: underweight (BMI < 18·5 kg/m2), normal weight (BMI ≥ 18·5 kg/m2 and BMI < 25 kg/m2), overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and BMI < 30 kg/m2) and obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2)(37). A binary variable for whether a woman was overweight or obese (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) or normal weight (BMI ≥ 18·5 kg/m2 and BMI < 25 kg/m2) was also created.

With respect to socio-economic and demographic characteristics, we examined SES, marital status and education. SES was assessed using principal component analysis (PCA)-derived indices of twenty items measuring housing quality and asset ownership in Ghana and twenty-six items measuring housing quality, asset and animal ownership in Tanzania. In Malawi, we created a summary variable for the number of household assets owned (possible range 0–12). Similar summary variables were constructed for Ghana (possible range 0–10) and Tanzania (possible range 0–20) as well. Marital status was assessed using a binary indicator for whether the woman was married or living with her partner. Education was defined using a binary indicator for whether the woman had no education or primary and higher.

Dietary patterns analysis

We used the same approach to derive DP separately for each comparison in each country. We aimed to ensure both comparability across samples and sufficient variability to conduct PCA. First, we created harmonised binary indicators for whether women consumed each food during the reference period (1 = food was regularly consumed, 0 = food was not consumed or was consumed infrequently). The reference period was the past 24 h in Ghana and the past 7 d in Malawi and Tanzania. While the FFQ reference period in Tanzania was the past 30 d, we converted it to 7 d to ensure better comparability with the Ghana and Malawi samples, and to ensure enough variability in food group consumption. Preliminary analyses of the Tanzania data showed that with a reference period of 30 d, nearly all participants consumed each food group (details on how food groups were aggregated are provided in the next paragraph), leaving low to no variance to be explained by PCA. For the binary indicators, no coding changes were done in the Ghana sample. In the Malawi sample, foods consumed ‘rarely or never’ or ‘less frequently, occasionally’ were coded as 0 = food was not consumed, and foods consumed ‘regularly’ were coded as 1 = food was consumed. In the Tanzania sample, foods consumed at least once per week were coded as 1 = food was consumed, and foods consumed less frequently (i.e., ‘never’ or ‘1–3 times per month’) were coded as 0 = food was not consumed.

Next, we examined the proportion of women who consumed each food in the reference period (Supplemental Tables 1A1D). Foods that were consumed by ≤10 % of respondents or by ≥90 % of respondents were excluded from the analyses due to their lack of variation. Food items that did not contribute to energy or macronutrient content, such as condiments, were also excluded from the analyses. Remaining foods were grouped into twenty-one mutually exclusive food groups based on guidelines for measuring minimum dietary diversity among WRA(38): cereals and grains; roots and tubers; legumes and pulses; nuts and seeds; dairy; meat, poultry and fish; eggs; dark green leafy vegetables (DGLV), vitamin A-rich vegetables; vitamin A-rich fruits; other fruits; other vegetables; oils and fats; savoury and fried snacks; sweets; sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB); and other beverages. The ‘meat, poultry and fish’ food group was disaggregated into separate meat, organ meat, poultry and fish groups given the existing evidence on differential associations between these individual food groups and overweight and obesity(39). Lastly, binary indicators were created for whether a food group was consumed (1 = at least one of the food items in the food group was consumed, 0 = none of the food items in the food group were consumed).

DP were derived separately for each comparison in each country using PCA. In the Malawi sample, the cereals and grains food group was excluded from the DP derivation since it was consumed by all women in the sample. The final selection of DP was based on scree plots, eigenvalues >1, Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy >0·55(40) and interpretability. Orthogonal varimax rotation was applied to improve the interpretability of the factors and to ensure that the retained factors were uncorrelated. DP were interpreted and labelled based on minimum absolute factor loadings ≥0·25. Food groups with higher absolute factor loadings weighed more in labelling the DP. DP scores were calculated by summing the foods consumed weighed by all their factor loadings. DP scores were then qualitatively examined and divided into quantiles: quintiles for WRA in Ghana and quartiles for WRA in Malawi and older women in Ghana and Tanzania.

Statistical analysis

Socio-economic and demographic characteristics were examined across quantiles for each DP in each country in each comparison. Bivariate relationships were assessed using a non-parametric test for trend across the ordered DP quantiles. Trends were considered statistically significant at P < 0·05.

To assess the relationship between the PCA-derived DP and continuous BMI, we used a generalised linear model with an identity link. For the combined overweight or obese variable, we fit a log-binomial model, and for the categorical BMI classification a multinomial logistic model. The lowest DP quantile in each sample was used as the reference group, representing women with the lowest DP scores. Unadjusted and adjusted mean differences (aMD) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) or odds ratio (aOR) and 95 % CI were calculated. Adjusted models controlled for women’s age, education, marital status and SES. All covariates were identified a priori. Associations were considered statistically significant at P < 0·05. Sampling weights were applied to the Ghana analyses. To account for multiple hypothesis testing, we also calculated corrected P-values, using the Hochberg method(41) which ensures sufficient power and Type I error protection(42). All statistical tests were two-sided. All analyses were performed using Stata 15(43).

Results

Sample characteristics and diet

Socio-economic and demographic characteristics for each country in each comparison are shown in Table 1. In all four samples, overweight and obesity were prevalent, with over half of the women falling in either category.

Table 1.

Socio-economic and demographic characteristics of women in the analysis sample by age group comparison and country

Women of reproductive age Older women
Ghana (n 1762) Malawi (n 137) Ghana (n 514) Tanzania (n 134)
Mean % sd Mean % sd Mean % sd Mean % sd
Age group
 18–24 years 38·0 29·9
 25–34 years 28·4 57·7
 35–54 years 33·5 12·4
 50–54 years 40·6
 ≥55 years 100 59·4
Has primary education or higher 89·1 58·7 53·3
Married or living with partner 55·6 26·0 46·4
Number of assets owned by household* 5·2 1·9 5·3 2·9 4·8 2·4 8·0 4·1
Mean BMI (kg/m2) 28·2 6·5 28·0 5·0 29·1 7·2 30·2 7·5
BMI category
 Underweight (18·5 kg/m2) 3·0 0·0 5·5 2·9
 Normal weight (18·5–24·9 kg/m2) 33·8 27·5 24·3 22·8
 Overweight (25–29·9 kg/m2) 27·5 40·6 27·8 28·7
 Obese (≥30·0 kg/m2) 35·7 31·9 42·4 45·6
*

Possible range: 0–10 in Ghana, 0–12 in Malawi and 0–20 in Tanzania.

WRA in Ghana consumed an average of 6·3 foods in the past 24 h (range 0–18), while WRA in Malawi consumed an average of 20·4 foods in the past 7 d (range 4–40). Older women consumed an average of 5·5 foods in the past 24 h (range 0–15) in Ghana and 33·5 foods in the past 7 d (range 0–71) in Tanzania. Consumption of food groups retained in the DP scores is shown in Supplemental Tables 1A1D.

Dietary patterns

Among WRA in Ghana, two DP, which explained 30 % of dietary variance, were identified and labelled as protein and healthy (Table 2, Supplemental Fig. 2A). The protein DP was characterised by high consumption of cereals, legumes and pulses, chicken, oils and fats, and savoury and fried snacks. High consumption of nuts and seeds, eggs, DGLV and other fruits characterised the healthy DP. Higher protein DP quintiles were associated with younger age (P for trend < 0·001), while higher healthy DP quintiles were marginally significantly associated with higher number of household assets (P for trend = 0·07) (Supplemental Table 2A).

Table 2.

Food group factor loadings by principal component analysis (PCA)-derived dietary pattern by age group comparison and country

Food groups Women of reproductive age Older women
Ghana Malawi Ghana Tanzania
Protein Healthy Protein Healthy Cereal Protein Healthy Protein Healthy
Cereals and grains 0·45* –0·09 0·67* 0·07 –0·02 0·03 0·29*
Roots and tubers 0·31* 0·04 0·14 0·30*
Legumes and pulses 0·32* 0·12 –0·04 0·39* –0·14 0·52* 0·14
Nuts and seeds 0·13 0·48* 0·28* –0·11 –0·06 0·47*
Dairy 0·49* –0·04 0·44* –0·08
Red meat 0·23 0·16 0·32* 0·03 –0·09 0·43* 0·12 0·38* –0·09
Chicken 0·43* –0·10 –0·07 0·36* 0·12 0·53* –0·03 0·37* 0·01
Liver 0·16 0·19
Fish 0·09 0·34*
Eggs 0·23 0·33* 0·28* 0·08 0·16 0·00 0·57* 0·37* 0·02
Dark green leafy vegetables –0·14 0·54* –0·16 –0·03 0·65* –0·14 0·37*
Vitamin A-rich vegetables§ –0·04 0·32* 0·18 0·10
Vitamin A-rich fruits 0·25* 0·04 –0·08 0·45*
Other fruits –0·06 0·55* –0·03 0·52* 0·20 0·09 0·41* 0·15 0·16
Other vegetables 0·00 0·43*
Oils and fats 0·43* 0·07 0·13 0·16
Savoury and fried snacks 0·41* –0·12 0·19 0·37* 0·06 0·50* –0·25* 0·10 0·19
Sweets 0·33* 0·02
Sugar-sweetened beverages 0·43* –0·04 0·65* –0·08 0·00 0·29* 0·02
Tea 0·39* –0·05

–, Food group was not available and therefore was not included in the PCA.

*

Food group with minimum absolute factor loading ≥0·25 characterising the dietary pattern.

In Ghana, legumes and pulses consisted only of beans.

In Ghana, nuts and seeds consisted only of groundnuts.

§

In Tanzania, vitamin A-rich vegetables consisted only of carrots.

In Ghana, oils and fats consisted only of butter.

Similarly, two DP, explaining 31 % of dietary variance, were identified among WRA in Malawi (Table 2, Supplemental Fig. 2B). The first DP was characterised by high consumption of roots and tubers, nuts and seeds, dairy, red meat, eggs, vitamin A-rich fruits, sweets and SSB. We labelled this DP as protein. The second DP was characterised by high consumption of legumes and pulses, chicken, vitamin A-rich vegetables, other fruits, other vegetables, and savoury and fried snacks. We labelled this DP as healthy. Higher quartiles of the protein DP were associated with a higher proportion of women with primary education or higher and higher number of household assets (P for trend = 0·02 and <0·001, respectively) (Supplemental Table 2B). Higher healthy DP quartiles were associated with a higher proportion of younger women and a lower proportion of older women (P for trend = 0·04).

Three DP were identified among older women in Ghana: cereal, protein and healthy (Table 2, Supplemental Fig. 2C). These three DP explained 43 % of dietary variance. The cereal DP was defined by high consumption of cereals and SSB. The protein DP was similar to that identified among WRA in Ghana. It was characterised by high consumption of legumes and pulses, red meat, chicken, and savoury and fried snacks. Finally, the healthy DP was characterised by high consumption of eggs, DGLV and other fruits and low consumption of savoury and fried snacks. Women in higher cereal DP quartiles were more likely to have primary education or higher (P for trend = 0·01) and had a marginally higher number of household assets (P for trend = 0·06) (Supplemental Table 2C). Higher protein DP quartiles were associated with a higher proportion of women with primary education or higher and lower number of household assets (P for trend <0·001 and 0·01, respectively). Finally, the number of household assets owned was higher in higher healthy DP quartiles (P for trend < 0·001).

Protein and healthy DP were identified among older women in Tanzania (Table 2, Supplemental Fig. 2D). The percentage of dietary variance they explained was 31 %. The protein DP was characterised by high consumption of dairy, red meat, chicken, eggs, SSB and tea. In contrast, the healthy DP was defined by high consumption of cereals, roots and tubers, nuts and seeds, fish, DGLV and vitamin A-rich fruits. Higher quartiles of both the protein and healthy DP were associated with a higher number of household assets (P for trend <0·001 and 0·02, respectively) (Supplemental Table 2D).

Association with BMI, overweight and obesity

Of the two DP identified among WRA in Ghana, the protein DP was associated with higher odds of overweight and obesity, while the healthy DP was not associated with either BMI or BMI categories (Fig. 1(a), Supplemental Table 3A). Relative to quintile 1 (Q1), higher protein DP quintile was associated with increased odds of overweight (aOR 1·87, 95 % CI 1·23, 2·83 for Q2; and aOR 1·67, 95 % CI 1·12, 2·48 for Q4) and obesity (aOR 1·79, 95 % CI 1·19, 2·70 for Q2). However, none of these estimates were statistically significant after correcting for multiple hypothesis testing. Estimates for the combined overweight or obesity category remained significant after the P-value correction, indicating higher odds of overweight or obesity in Q2 of the protein DP, compared with Q1: aOR 1·82, 95 % CI 1·27, 2·60.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

(a) Association between principal component analysis-derived dietary patterns and overweight and obesity among women of reproductive age (18–54 years) in Ghana. Estimates from a multinomial logistic model controlling for age, education, marital status and wealth. For each dietary pattern, comparisons were to quintile 1 (Q1). Overweight was defined as BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and BMI < 30 kg/m2 and obesity as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. Comparison was to women of normal weight (BMI ≥ 18·5 kg/m2 and BMI < 25 kg/m2). (b) Association between principal component analysis-derived dietary patterns and overweight and obesity among women of reproductive age (19–48 years) in Malawi. Estimates from a multinomial logistic model controlling for age, education and wealth. For each dietary pattern, comparisons were to quartile 1 (Q1). Overweight was defined as BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and BMI < 30 kg/m2 and obesity as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. Comparison was to women of normal weight (BMI ≥ 18·5 kg/m2 and BMI < 25 kg/m2). (c) Association between principal component analysis-derived dietary patterns and overweight and obesity among older women (≥55 years) in Ghana. Estimates from a multinomial logistic model controlling for age, education and wealth. For each dietary pattern, comparisons were to quartile 1 (Q1). Overweight was defined as BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and BMI < 30 kg/m2 and obesity as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. Comparison was to women of normal weight (BMI ≥ 18·5 kg/m2 and BMI < 25 kg/m2). (d) Association between principal component analysis-derived dietary patterns and overweight and obesity among older women (≥50 years) in Tanzania. Estimates from a multinomial logistic model controlling for age, marital status and wealth. For each dietary pattern, comparisons were to quintile 1 (Q1). Overweight was defined as BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and BMI < 30 kg/m2 and obesity as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. Comparison was to women of normal weight (BMI ≥ 18·5 kg/m2 and BMI < 25 kg/m2). Inline graphic, overweight and Inline graphic, obesity

Similarly, the healthy DP was not associated with BMI, overweight or obesity among WRA in Malawi, while higher quartiles of the protein DP were associated with higher odds of overweight: aOR 5·04 (95 % CI 1·07, 23·76) for Q3 v. Q1 (Fig. 1(b), Supplemental Table 3B). However, these estimates were not statistically significant after correcting for multiple hypothesis testing.

Among older women in Ghana, the cereal and healthy DP were not associated with either BMI or BMI categories (Fig. 1(c), Supplemental Table 1C). Similar to WRA in Ghana and Malawi, older women in higher protein DP quartiles had higher BMI (aMD 2·76, 95 % CI 0·54, 4·99 for Q2 and aMD 2·83, 95 % CI 0·95, 4·71 for Q3) and higher odds of obesity (aOR 2·32, 95 % CI 1·02, 5·30 for Q2 and 2·29, 95 % CI 1·17, 4·48 for Q3) compared with women in the first protein DP quartile. Likewise, the odds of overweight or obesity were higher among women in the third protein DP quartile compared with women in the first: aOR 2·08, 95 % CI 1·12, 3·86. After adjusting for multiple hypothesis testing, the only association that remained significant was that between higher BMI and protein DP Q3.

Finally, none of the DP identified in Tanzania (protein and healthy) were associated with BMI, overweight or obesity (Fig. 1(d), Supplemental Table 3D). Results suggested that higher healthy DP quartiles lowered the odds of overweight, but the results did not reach statistical significance: aOR 0·18, 95 % CI 0·03, 1·01.

Discussion

We identified protein and healthy DP in each sample of WRA in Ghana and Malawi, explaining 30 and 31 % of dietary variance, respectively. Among older women, we identified cereal, protein and healthy DP (explaining 43 % of dietary variance) in Ghana, and protein and healthy DP (explaining 31 % of dietary variance) in Tanzania.

Protein DP were identified in all four samples. Among WRA, the protein DP were defined by high consumption of both animal- and plant-based proteins. In both the Ghana and Malawi samples, DP suggested a potential shift towards unhealthy foods: savoury and fried snacks characterised the protein DP among WRA in Ghana and the healthy DP among WRA in Malawi, while sweets and SSB characterised the protein DP among WRA in Malawi. However, the protein DP among WRA in Malawi was also characterised by consumption of healthier foods (nuts and seeds, eggs and vitamin A-rich fruits) and therefore possibly represented a transitional rather than a wholly unhealthy diet. Evidence from urban Benin suggests that transitional DP, with relatively low percentage of energy from fat, saturated fat and sugar, may represent a diversification of traditional diets instead of a shift from a traditional to a modern diet(29). However, given differences in diet assessment tools, we could not examine DP macro- and micronutrient contents in all samples and did not formally test this transitional-diversification hypothesis. Similarly, the protein DP among older women in Ghana was not wholly unhealthy. Despite the high intake of savoury and fried snacks, this DP was most strongly defined by consumption of plant-based proteins and lean meat. Finally, the protein DP identified among older women in Tanzania was the only protein DP entirely defined by animal-based proteins and unhealthy foods like SSB, suggesting a clearer shift towards a more unhealthy, modern diet in this population.

Previous studies among women living in urban SSA have identified similar combinations of DP: healthy and meat DP in Cameroon(24) and Botswana(25), or traditional/healthy and transitional/purchase/modern DP in Benin(29), Ghana(31) and Tanzania(21). Our findings are consistent with studies from other regions, which have previously identified healthy, Western/modern or meat/protein DP or some combination of these(1018,4447). In Ghana, the only other study of DP among women living in urban areas (mean age 50·4 years, data collected in 2007–2008) identified purchase and traditional DP(31). The latter was characterised by high consumption of plantains, DGLV, eggs and fruits, among other foods(31) and was closely aligned with the healthy DP we identified among both WRA and older women in Ghana. The protein DP we identified in WRA and older women in Ghana also tracked the purchase DP identified by Frank et al. (31) to the extent that we found high consumption of protein-rich foods and savoury and fried snacks. Further, the DP we identified among both WRA and older women in Ghana explained a larger proportion of dietary variance (30 and 43 %, respectively) compared with the 22 % of dietary variance explained by DP identified by Frank et al. (31). With respect to Tanzania, a study conducted in Arusha City, a much smaller urban area compared with Dar es Salaam, examined DP among women 25–64 years of age and identified healthy, Western and complex DP(21). The former two DP closely resembled the healthy and protein DP we identified among older women in Tanzania. Finally, one study characterised DP among a nationally representative sample of elderly people (≥60 years old) in Botswana(25). The milk, tea and candy DP (one of the five DP identified: beer, meat and fruit, vegetable and bread, seasonal produce, and milk, tea and candy) also loaded highly on cereals and grains, although the factor loadings did not reach the cut-offs established by the authors(25). This DP corresponded to the cereal DP in our sample of older women in Tanzania. The remaining DP identified among the elderly in Botswana differed from the healthy-meat and healthy-modern DP dichotomy identified in more recent studies. These differences may reflect an earlier stage of the nutrition transition (data from 1998 were used in Botswana), or an innately different diet in this population.

Higher quantiles of all DP were associated with higher wealth (number of household assets owned) in all but the older women sample in Ghana, where wealth was inversely associated with higher protein DP quartiles. Similar associations between healthy/traditional DP and wealth have been previously observed both in SSA(30) and other regions(44). Additionally, higher protein DP quartiles among WRA in Malawi and higher cereal and protein DP quartiles among older women in Ghana were associated with a higher level of education. Contrary to our findings, women’s education only played a marginal role in urban diets in Burkina Faso(30), while low education was associated with higher purchase DP and not associated with traditional DP in Ghana(31).

We found no associations between DP and BMI, overweight and obesity in any of the four samples, except for a higher odds of overweight or obesity among women in protein DP Q2, compared with women in Q1, in WRA in Ghana, and a higher BMI among women in protein DP Q3, compared with women in Q1, in older women in Ghana. The only other study which has previously examined the association between DP and overweight among women in urban SSA showed that a modern DP, characterised by meat and eggs consumption among other foods, was positively associated with overweight among adult women living in urban Burkina Faso(30). While we observed a similar association between the protein DP and overweight or obesity among WRA in Ghana, the relationship was stronger in lower rather than higher DP quintiles, which could partially be explained by the much higher consumption of plant-based protein in these higher quintiles. In addition, the protein DP we identified was more strongly characterised by plant-based proteins and lean meat rather than red meat and eggs, which described the modern DP in Burkina Faso(30). Together with the different age range of participants (20–65 years in Burkina Faso, and 18–54 years in our sample), these differences between our protein DP and the Burkina Faso modern DP could help account for some of the differences in associations between these protein-heavy DP and overweight. In our Malawi sample, the lack of association between the protein DP, most strongly defined by high consumption of dairy and SSB, should be interpreted with caution. Given the small sample size of WRA in Malawi, it is possible we lacked power to detect a statistically significant association. In addition, we did not use data on the quantity of dairy and SSB consumed, which could potentially play a more important role in raising BMI than the frequency of consumption of these two food groups. Finally, the diversified nature of this protein DP may distort the relationship between wholly unhealthy meat-and-fat DP and higher prevalence of overweight and obesity previously reported in high-income settings(1115).

With respect to older women, only the protein DP in Ghana was associated with BMI, with women in Q3 having significantly higher BMI compared with women in Q1. The lack of association between the remaining DP in Ghana or Tanzania and overweight and obesity could reflect an earlier stage of the nutrition transition (data collected in 2008–2009 in Ghana and 2014 in Tanzania) or somewhat healthier expressions of the DP. For example, the protein DP in older women in Tanzania was also characterised by moderate consumption of vitamin A-rich vegetables and other fruits, while in Ghana, the protein DP was characterised by high consumption of plant-based proteins and lean meat. Given the lack of studies that have examined the relationship between DP and BMI among older women in urban SSA, our findings should be interpreted with caution as it is possible that they reflect context- or sample-specific trends rather than broader patterns among older women in urban SSA.

One of the main strengths of our study is the use of an a posteriori approach to derive the DP. PCA allowed us to explore and summarise women’s diets as they were observed in each sample. In the absence of any national dietary or nutrition recommendations or guidelines in any of the countries in our study(48), a priori approaches based on pre-defined indices were deemed infeasible. Although a posteriori approaches tend to produce DP that are population-specific and difficult to reproduce, making them less suitable for a cross-country comparison, DP derived using a posteriori approaches reflect actual dietary practices and differences in these practices(49).

Our study also has limitations. First, diet assessment tools differed across countries. The diet assessment in Ghana did not collect information on portion size or frequency of food consumption, both of which are likely more important predictors of overweight and obesity. The shorter recall period in Ghana (24 h) compared with Malawi and Tanzania (7 d in each) can also help explain the lower variability in food consumption observed in Ghana. Despite these differences in diet assessment tools, we harmonised and aligned our diet indicators across countries to the extent possible to ensure comparability. Second, while in Ghana, we had a large sample representative of adult women living in Accra, the samples in both Malawi and Tanzania were small and we may have lacked power to detect a statistically significant association between DP and BMI and BMI categories in these samples. In addition, the sampling strategy in Malawi differed from those in Ghana and Tanzania: it sampled mother–child pairs with an overweight mother, an overweight child or both. Thus, it is possible that these women’s diets might not be representative of all WRA. Third, the dates of data collection differed by 10 years and it is possible the DP we identified reflect different stages of the nutrition transition. The protein DP in Malawi and Tanzania (data collected 2017–2018 and 2014, respectively) showed greater diversity than the protein DP in Ghana (data collected 2008–2009). However, despite the gap between data collection years, levels of economic development were comparable in Ghana (2008–2009 gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of $2844) and Tanzania (2014 GDP per capita of $2575). Although Malawi’s GDP per capita in 2017–2018 ($1159) was lower than Ghana’s in 2008–2009 or Tanzania’s in 2014, Malawi’s 2017–2018 annual GDP growth rate of 4 % was comparable with Ghana’s 4·8 % GDP growth rate in 2009. These similarities across time in economic development and the prevalence of overweight and obesity in our samples suggest that all three countries were in the same stage of the obesity transition(2), which lends validity to our comparison of data collected 10 years apart. Therefore, it is likely that the differences in diversity across the protein DP we identified in the different settings are likely due to differences in the diet assessment tools that were used rather than dietary changes over time. Finally, the cross-sectional nature of our study did not allow us to establish causality between diet and overweight and obesity, or to examine changes in this relationship over time.

Conclusions

Among WRA in urban SSA, healthy and protein DP characterised diets in Ghana and Malawi. In Ghana, higher protein DP quintiles were associated with higher odds of overweight or obesity. Among older women in SSA, cereal, protein and healthy DP were identified in Ghana, and protein and healthy DP in Tanzania. Only the protein DP in Ghana was associated with higher BMI. Further research is needed to understand the role of protein-rich foods and the lack of association between DP and overweight and obesity among WRA and older women living in urban SSA to help inform local diet recommendations and interventions that aim to reduce the prevalence of overweight and obesity in urban settings.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements: The authors would like to acknowledge the research teams in each study country, as well as the participants for their time and participation in the studies. Financial support: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. The Malawi study was funded by the Drivers of Food Choice (DFC) Competitive Grants Programs, which is funded by the UK Government’s Department for International Development and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and managed by the University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, USA; however, the views expressed do not necessarily reflect the UK Government’s official policies. Conflict of interest: None. Authorship: L.B. and L.M.J. conceptualised the study. G.D. designed the Tanzania study and led the fieldwork and data collection activities. G.F. was part of the Ghana study team and supervised all fieldwork and data collection activities. V.L.F., C.T. and L.M.J. designed the Malawi study and led the fieldwork and data collection activities. L.B. and L.M.J. led the data analyses. L.B. drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to interpretation of the results and the intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final version of the paper. L.B. had final responsibility for submitting this article for publication. Ethics of human subject participation: The study was approved by the institutional review board of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (reference number: IRB18-1671). All data were anonymous and contained no identifiable information on the study participants. The study was considered exempt from full review.

Supplementary material

For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980019005202.

S1368980019005202sup001.docx (285.5KB, docx)

click here to view supplementary material

References

  • 1. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M et al. (2014) Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 384, 766–781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Jaacks LM, Vandevijvere S, Pan A et al. (2019) The obesity transition: stages of the global epidemic. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 7, 231–240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Ford ND, Patel SA & Narayan KMV (2017) Obesity in low- and middle-income countries: burden, drivers, and emerging challenges. Annu Rev Public Health 38, 145–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Bixby H, Bentham J, Zhou B et al. (2019) Rising rural body-mass index is the main driver of the global obesity epidemic in adults. Nature 569, 260–264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. National Statistical Office (NSO) [Malawi] & ICF (2017) Malawi Demographic and Health Survey 2015–16. Zomba, Malawi, and Rockville, Maryland, USA. NSO and ICF.
  • 6. Ghana Statistical Service (GSS), Ghana Health Service (GHS) and II (2015) Ghana Demographic and Health Survey 2014. Rockville, MD: GSS, GHS, and ICF International. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender E and C (MoHCDGEC) [Tanzania, Mainland], Ministry of Health (MoH) [Zanzibar] et al. (2016) Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey and Malaria Indicator Survey (TDHS-MIS) 2015–16. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: MoHCDGEC, MoH, NBS, OCGS, and ICF.
  • 8. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) (2019) GBD Compare Data Visualization. Seattle, WA: IHME, University of Washington. http://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hu FB (2008) Chapter 6. Dietary assessment methods. In Obesity Epidemiology, pp. 85–118 [Hu F, editor]. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Arabshahi S, Ibiebele TI, Hughes MCB et al. (2017) Dietary patterns and weight change: 15-year longitudinal study in Australian adults. Eur J Nutr 56, 1455–1465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Boggs DA, Palmer JR, Spiegelman D et al. (2011) Dietary patterns and 14-y weight gain in African American women. Am J Clin Nutr 94, 86–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Esmaillzadeh A & Azadbakht L (2008) Major dietary patterns in relation to general obesity and central adiposity among Iranian women. J Nutr 138, 358–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Cunha DB, de Almeida RMVR, Sichieri R et al. (2010) Association of dietary patterns with BMI and waist circumference in a low-income neighbourhood in Brazil. Br J Nutr 104, 908–913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Murtaugh MA, Herrick JS, Sweeney C et al. (2007) Diet composition and risk of overweight and obesity in women living in the Southwestern United States. J Am Diet Assoc 107, 1311–1321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Schulze MB, Fung TT, Manson JE et al. (2006) Dietary patterns and changes in body weight in women. Obesity 14, 1444–1453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Suliga E, Kozieł D, Cieśla E et al. (2015) Association between dietary patterns and metabolic syndrome in individuals with normal weight: a cross-sectional study. Nutr J 14, 55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Newby PK, Muller D, Hallfrisch J et al. (2004) Food patterns measured by factor analysis and anthropometric changes in adults. Am J Clin Nutr 80, 504–513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Zhang JG, Wang ZH, Wang HJ et al. (2015) Dietary patterns and their associations with general obesity and abdominal obesity among young Chinese women. Eur J Clin Nutr 69, 1009–1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Keding GB, Msuya JM, Maass BL et al. (2011) Dietary patterns and nutritional health of women: the nutrition transition in rural Tanzania. Food Nutr Bull 32, 218–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Jordan I, Hebestreit A, Swai B et al. (2013) Dietary patterns and breast cancer risk among women in northern Tanzania: a case-control study. Eur J Nutr 52, 905–915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Katalambula LK, Meyer DN, Ngoma T et al. (2017) Dietary pattern and other lifestyle factors as potential contributors to hypertension prevalence in Arusha City, Tanzania: a population-based descriptive study. BMC Public Health 17, 1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Tluway FD, Leyna GH & Mmbaga EJ (2018) Magnitude and factors associated with overweight and obesity among adolescents in semi-rural area of Babati district, Tanzania. Tanzan J Health Res 20, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Pisa PT, Pedro TM, Kahn K et al. (2015) Nutrient patterns and their association with socio-demographic, lifestyle factors and obesity risk in rural South African adolescents. Nutrients 7, 3464–3482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Nkondjock A & Bizome E (2010) Dietary patterns associated with hypertension prevalence in the Cameroon defence forces. Eur J Clin Nutr 64, 1014–1021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Maruapula S & Chapman-novakofski K (2007) Health and dietary patterns of the elderly in Botswana. J Nutr Educ Behav 39, 311–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Hooper R, Calvert J, Thompson RL et al. (2008) Urban/rural differences in diet and atopy in South Africa. Allergy 63, 425–431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Sewram V, Sitas F, Connell DO et al. (2014) Diet and esophageal cancer risk in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Nutr Cancer 66, 791–799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Ogum Alangea D, Aryeetey RN, Gray HL et al. (2018) Dietary patterns and associated risk factors among school age children in urban Ghana. BMC Nutr 4, 22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Sodjinou R, Agueh V, Fayomi B et al. (2009) Dietary patterns of urban adults in Benin: relationship with overall diet quality and socio-demographic characteristics. Eur J Clin Nutr 63, 222–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Becquey E, Savy M, Danel P et al. (2010) Dietary patterns of adults living in Ouagadougou and their association with overweight. Nutr J 9, 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Frank LK, Kröger J, Schulze MB et al. (2014) Dietary patterns in urban Ghana and risk of type 2 diabetes. Br J Nutr 112, 89–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. The WHSA-II Writing Team (2011) Final Report on the Women’s Health Study of Accra, Wave II.
  • 33. Wrottesley SV, Micklesfield LK, Hamill MM et al. (2014) Dietary intake and body composition in HIV-positive and -negative South African women. Public Health Nutr 17, 1603–1613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Zack RM, Irema K, Kazonda P et al. (2018) Validity of an FFQ to measure nutrient and food intakes in Tanzania. Public Health Nutr 21, 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Zack RM, Irema K, Kazonda P et al. (2016) Determinants of high blood pressure and barriers to diagnosis and treatment in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. J Hypertens 34, 2353–2364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Kakarmath SS, Zack RM, Leyna GH et al. (2017) Dietary determinants of serum total cholesterol among middle-aged and older adults: a population-based cross-sectional study in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. BMJ Open 7, e015028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. World Health Organization (2000) Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. WHO Technical Report Series no. 894. Geneva: WHO. [PubMed]
  • 38. FAO and FHI 360 (2016) Minimum Dietary Diversty for Women: A Guide to Measurement. Rome: FAO. [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Schwingshackl L, Schwedhelm C, Hoffmann G et al. (2017) Food groups and risk of hypertension: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Adv Nutr An Int Rev J 8, 793–803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Kaiser HF (1974) An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39, 31–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Hochberg BYY (1988) A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 75, 800–802. [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Blakesley RE, Mazumdar S, Dew MA et al. (2009) Comparisons of methods for multiple hypothesis testing in neuropsychological research. Neuropsychology 23, 255–264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. StataCorp (2017) Stata: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP. [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Kant AK (2004) Dietary patterns and health outcomes. J Am Diet Assoc 104, 615–635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Ford ND, Jaacks LM, Martorell R et al. (2017) Dietary patterns and cardio-metabolic risk in a population of Guatemalan young adults. BMC Nutr 3, 68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Denova-Gutiérrez E, Castañón S, Talavera JO et al. (2010) Dietary patterns are associated with metabolic syndrome in an urban Mexican population. J Nutr 140, 1855–1863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Mayén A-L, Stringhini S, Ford ND et al. (2016) Socioeconomic predictors of dietary patterns among Guatemalan adults. Int J Public Health 61, 1069–1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Herforth A, Arimond M, Álvarez-Sánchez C et al. (2019) A global review of food-based dietary guidelines. Adv Nutr 10, 730. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmz055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Jacques P & Tucker K (2001) Are dietary patterns useful for understanding the role of diet in chronic disease? Am J Clin Nutr 73, 1–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

For supplementary material accompanying this paper visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980019005202.

S1368980019005202sup001.docx (285.5KB, docx)

click here to view supplementary material


Articles from Public Health Nutrition are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES