Skip to main content
Thorax logoLink to Thorax
. 1989 Dec;44(12):1031–1035. doi: 10.1136/thx.44.12.1031

Prediction of microbial aetiology at admission to hospital for pneumonia from the presenting clinical features. British Thoracic Society Pneumonia Research Subcommittee.

B M Farr 1, D L Kaiser 1, B D Harrison 1, C K Connolly 1
PMCID: PMC1020880  PMID: 2515602

Abstract

The selection of initial antimicrobial treatment in a patient with community acquired pneumonia is an important clinical decision. Because this decision is usually made before the results of specific microbiological tests are available, we attempted to determine how well the presenting clinical features would allow prediction of microbial aetiology in 441 adults admitted to hospital with pneumonia. Five of 90 variable available on admission were selected for inclusion in a multivariate discriminant function analysis because of their strong association with one or more of the major aetiological subsets (Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, "other," and undetermined). These variables were age, number of days ill before admission, presence or absence of bloody sputum and of lobar infiltration on chest radiograph, and white blood cell count. The microbial aetiology was correctly predicted by this discriminant function analysis in only 42% of cases, which gives a quantitative estimate of the degree of difficulty encountered in determining the microbial aetiology at the time of admission for pneumonia. When a similar discriminant function analysis was applied to the third of patients in whom the microbial aetiology was never determined, most of these cases were predicted to be due to Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Full text

PDF
1033

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BATH J. C., BOISSARD G. P., CALDER M. A., MOFFAT M. A. PNEUMONIA IN HOSPITAL PRACTICE IN EDINBURGH 1960-1962. Br J Dis Chest. 1964 Jan;58:1–16. doi: 10.1016/s0007-0971(64)80017-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartlett J. G., Gorbach S. L. The triple threat of aspiration pneumonia. Chest. 1975 Oct;68(4):560–566. doi: 10.1378/chest.68.4.560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. El-Refaie M., Dulake C. Counter-current immunoelectrophoresis for the diagnosis of pneumococcal chest infection. J Clin Pathol. 1975 Oct;28(10):801–806. doi: 10.1136/jcp.28.10.801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Rein M. F., Gwaltney J. M., Jr, O'Brien W. M., Jennings R. H., Mandell G. L. Accuracy of Gram's stain in identifying pneumococci in sputum. JAMA. 1978 Jun 23;239(25):2671–2673. doi: 10.1001/jama.239.25.2671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Spencer R. C., Philp J. R. Effect of previous antimicrobial therapy on bacteriological findings in patients with primary pneumonia. Lancet. 1973 Aug 18;2(7825):349–350. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(73)93192-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Woodhead M. A., Macfarlane J. T. Comparative clinical and laboratory features of legionella with pneumococcal and mycoplasma pneumonias. Br J Dis Chest. 1987 Apr;81(2):133–139. doi: 10.1016/0007-0971(87)90130-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wreghitt T. G., Sillis M. A micro-capture ELISA for detecting Mycoplasma pneumoniae IgM: comparison with indirect immunofluorescence and indirect ELISA. J Hyg (Lond) 1985 Apr;94(2):217–227. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400061428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Thorax are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES