Abstract
To determine the reasons some family physicians continue to practice obstetrics when most of their colleagues do not, we surveyed family physicians in 26 counties of northern California whose practices include obstetrics and those who have recently discontinued it. In all, 70% of family physicians practicing obstetrics cited enjoying it as a reason for continuing this practice. Over a third of family physicians practicing obstetrics thought that obstetric practice was a responsibility to the community. Only 1 in 6 reported obstetrics to be important in terms of financial implications. Despite this, family physicians practicing obstetrics had a mean gross income derived from obstetric practice of $30,000 above the cost of their total malpractice premium. In contrast, a comparison group of family physicians who had recently discontinued obstetrics cited malpractice insurance costs most frequently as the reason for discontinuing it. Nearly 40% of these physicians indicated that they would be willing to return to obstetrics if circumstances were to change substantially. The most frequently cited change necessary for these physicians to return to obstetrics was a reduction in malpractice insurance rates.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bredfeldt R. C., Sutherland J. E., Wesley R. M. Obstetrics in family medicine: effects on physician work load, income, and age of practice population. Fam Med. 1989 Jul-Aug;21(4):279–282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Franks P., Eisinger S. Adverse perinatal outcomes: is physician specialty a risk factor? J Fam Pract. 1987 Feb;24(2):152–156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LeFevre M., Zweig S., Kruse J. Selection of a physician for prenatal care. J Fam Pract. 1987 Mar;24(3):275–279. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mengel M. B., Phillips W. R. The quality of obstetric care in family practice: are family physicians as safe as obstetricians? J Fam Pract. 1987 Feb;24(2):159–164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nesbitt T. S., Connell F. A., Hart L. G., Rosenblatt R. A. Access to obstetric care in rural areas: effect on birth outcomes. Am J Public Health. 1990 Jul;80(7):814–818. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.7.814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nesbitt T. S., Tanji J. L., Scherger J. E., Kahn N. B. Obstetric care, Medicaid, and family physicians. How policy changes affect physicians' attitudes. West J Med. 1991 Dec;155(6):653–657. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodney W. M., Sanderson L. Effect of perceived malpractice insurance costs on the family practice career goals of medical students. Fam Med. 1988 Nov-Dec;20(6):418–421. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosenblatt R. A., Detering B. Changing patterns of obstetric practice in Washington State: the impact of tort reform. Fam Med. 1988 Mar-Apr;20(2):101–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmittling G., Tsou C. Obstetric privileges for family physicians: a national study. J Fam Pract. 1989 Aug;29(2):179–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith M. A., Green L. A., Schwenk T. L. Family practice obstetrics in Michigan. Factors affecting physician participation. J Fam Pract. 1989 Apr;28(4):433–437. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith M. A., Howard K. P. Choosing to do obstetrics in practice: factors affecting the decisions of third-year family practice residents. Fam Med. 1987 May-Jun;19(3):191–194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]