Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2023 May 27;14:3058. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38852-4

Scalable-produced 3D elastic thermoelectric network for body heat harvesting

Yijie Liu 1,2,#, Xiaodong Wang 3,#, Shuaihang Hou 3, Zuoxu Wu 2, Jian Wang 2, Jun Mao 3,4, Qian Zhang 3,4,, Zhiguo Liu 1,, Feng Cao 2,
PMCID: PMC10224941  PMID: 37244924

Abstract

Flexible thermoelectric generators can power wearable electronics by harvesting body heat. However, existing thermoelectric materials rarely realize high flexibility and output properties simultaneously. Here we present a facile, cost-effective, and scalable two-step impregnation method for fabricating a three-dimensional thermoelectric network with excellent elasticity and superior thermoelectric performance. The reticular construction endows this material with ultra-light weight (0.28 g cm−3), ultra-low thermal conductivity (0.04 W m−1 K−1), moderate softness (0.03 MPa), and high elongation (>100%). The obtained network-based flexible thermoelectric generator achieves a pretty high output power of 4 μW cm−2, even comparable to state-of-the-art bulk-based flexible thermoelectric generators.

Subject terms: Thermoelectric devices and materials, Porous materials, Thermoelectrics, Devices for energy harvesting


Flexible thermoelectric generators can use body heat to power electronic wearables but are often limited by a trade-off between flexibility and output performance. Here, authors demonstrate a scalable, lightweight, elastic, and high-performing network-based Ag2Se thermoelectric generator.

Introduction

With the rapid development of “Internet of Things” technology, the popularity of flexible electronics has risen enormously. As a result, the global flexible electronics market was valued at USD ~28 billion in 2020 and that is expected to reach USD ~ 56 billion by 20261. However, the convenience and endurance of the most common flexible electronics are hindered by their power sources which need to be able to operate continuously2. Various energy-harvesting technologies, such as triboelectric nanogenerators3,4, piezoelectric nanogenerators5, flexible solar cells6,7, and flexible thermoelectric generators (FTEG)2,8, were thus developed. Features that directly convert body heat into electricity make the FTEG highly appealing, as power is sustainably generated without the need for chemical energy, sunlight, or mechanical motion911.

The common bulk thermoelectric materials, whether inorganic materials (e.g., bismuth antimony telluride alloys12 and silver selenide13, etc.) or conducting polymers [e.g., PEDOT:PSS (poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly (styrene sulfonate))1416 and PANI (polyaniline)15,1719], are intrinsically inflexible20. Some strategies were thus proposed to meet the flexibility of FTEG. One strategy is processing the thermoelectric material into thin film or sheet2129. Although bendable26,27,30 or even elastic31, the thermoelectric thin film or sheet usually harvests thermal energy in the in-plane direction rather than in the more desirable film-thickness direction. Three-dimension (3D) FTEG, by contrast, is more suitable for harvesting body heat during wear. Combining flexible matrix with rigid thermoelectric legs is a device-level strategy to obtain 3D FTEGs3237. This kind of FTEG has the highest thermoelectric performance, but the heavy and incompatible rigid thermoelectric legs significantly reduce their wearing comfort and reliability9,38. To better match the elastic skin, improve comfortability, and recover the deformation induced in operation, developing a thermoelectric material with elasticity is necessary for an FTEG. Mixing insulating elastomers with conducting polymers or carbon nanotubes can result in 3D stretchable thermoelectric materials or thermoelectric elastomers18,20,3941. However, these composites demonstrate inferior thermoelectric performance (zT < 0.03) in comparison to the inorganic thermoelectric materials due to their intrinsically low Seebeck coefficient20. Consequently, achieving a material simultaneously possesses elasticity and high thermoelectric performance is still challenging.

Here, we report a facile, cost-effective, and scalable two-step impregnation method for synthesizing a 3D Ag2Se network. Benefiting from the deformable and low-thermal-conductive network structure, the proposed thermoelectric network can not only exhibit sufficient elasticity (elongation > 100%), but also achieve a comparable output power to traditional bulk-based FTEGs with the flexible matrix. Unlike the conventional preparation process of thermoelectric material or device, our fabrication technique depends hardly on complex equipment, which makes the Ag2Se network can be large-scale produced at low cost and processed into special shapes to match the various heater surfaces. Furthermore, the soft texture (Young’s modulus ~0.03 MPa) and the ultralight weight (density ~0.28 g cm−3) of Ag2Se network also ensure its enormous potential in wearable applications. A thermoelectric network-filled jacket is fabricated to verify the actual effect of body heat harvesting. It can generate milliwatt-level power in daily wear, covering the consumption of most integrated circuits and sensors in wearables42,43. The high output performance, scalable technique, and significant advantages in wearability enable the promising applications of Ag2Se network.

Results and discussion

Three-dimensional elastic Ag2Se network

Our two-step impregnation method for making the Ag2Se network (Fig. 1a) is inspired by two classical chemical reactions, “Tollens’ reaction”44 and “Transition metal selenization”45. In the first step, SnCl2-pretreated melamine template is immersed into Tollens’ reagent containing Ag+ and Ag(NH3)2+. The Ag+ in the solution is reduced by the Sn2+ on the template to form Ag nucleus46, and the coexisting Ag(NH3)2+ is subsequently reduced by the reductant comprising glucose monohydrate and potassium sodium tartrate tetrahydrate to form a silver network. In the second step, the obtained silver network is impregnated into the selenium solution47 for selenizing to in-situ synthesize the Ag2Se network48. The porosity of the Ag2Se network measured with the Archimedes method can be controlled from 98% to 95% with a pristine porosity of 99% through the adjustment of reaction proportion and reaction times (Fig. S1). The detailed optimization is provided in Experimental Section. Because all the procedures are handled at ambient conditions, a nearly 2-square-meter sample is effortlessly produced (Figs. 1b and S3). Furthermore, unlike brittle thermoelectric bulks, the obtained three-dimensional network can be easily processed into special shapes (e.g., arch, cone, cuboid, and tube, etc.) to match well with the complex heater surfaces (Fig. 1c).

Fig. 1. Fabrication process and photos of Ag2Se network.

Fig. 1

a Schematic of the two-step impregnation process, showing the in-situ synthesis of Ag2Se network by silvering and then selenizing. b A large Ag2Se network with a size of 1.8 × 0.9 m2. c Ag2Se networks are processed to special shapes.

With the help of the micro-scale structure deformation, the Ag2Se network demonstrates macro-scale stretching and compressing (Fig. 2a–c), which is similar to the metal-mesh electrodes characterized in the previous works49. A tensile strain (εt) of >100% and a compressive strain (εc) of >80% were obtained (Fig. 2d). The Young’s modulus of the Ag2Se network extracted from the compressive stress-strain curve is ~0.03 MPa, which is considered as an ideal and tissue-like modulus that enables the intimate fitting of devices with the uneven skin, reducing the effects of mechanical loads5053. The room-temperature Seebeck coefficient and resistivity of the Ag2Se network under compressive and tensile strains were measured on a ZEM-3. The results indicate that there is little change in the Seebeck coefficient with the strain, and the change in power factor mainly results from the change in resistivity, which can be ascribed to the variation in the geometric size of the Ag2Se network. (Fig. S4). We also carried out cyclic mechanical and electromechanical tests to show the durability of the Ag2Se network (Fig. 2e–g). Even though a hysteresis in the stress-strain curve is observed because of viscoelasticity, the sample can recover to its initial state after the successive cycles at different strains (Fig. 2e). A slight mechanical degradation occurs in the initial cycle of the tensile-strain test (Fig. 2f), but it does not deteriorate in the subsequent cycles. Correspondingly, the relative resistance of the Ag2Se network almost remained stable under cyclic tests with different strain rates (Fig. 2g). The changes in resistance are similar to the typical trend of stretchable conductive materials31,54. The possible reasons for the decline in resistance over cycles are the alignment of fibrils and the viscoelasticity of the template31,55. The Ag2Se network, as an elastic material, also performs well in bending. It can survive 200 cycles bending with a 5 mm radius without significant deterioration (Fig. S5). Additional characterizations of the Ag2Se network including morphology, energy dispersive spectrum, element mapping, XRD pattern, and optical bandgap are provided in Fig. S6S10 and Table S1. The obtained Ag2Se network is a single phase without any impurity, and the bandgap is about 0.23 eV.

Fig. 2. Mechanical, and thermoelectric properties of Ag2Se network.

Fig. 2

ac Photos (inset) and cross-section micrographs of the Ag2Se network in different states, showing the deformation of network structure under stress. d Tensile stress (σt)–strain (εt) curve and compressive stress (σc)–strain (εc) curve with corresponding resistance change (R/R0). e Cyclic σcεc curves with strain varying from 50% to 80% (bottom left), and σtεt curves with strain from 40% to 100% (top right). f Cyclic strain-stress curves at a maximum εc of 80% (bottom left) and a maximum εt of 100% (top right). g R/R0 upon cyclic compressing (top) and stretching (bottom) under different strain rates. h Thermoelectric performance of Ag2Se network including electrical resistivity (ρ), Seebeck coefficient (S), power factor (PF), and zT value. i Comparison of the present zT value with reported 3D flexible thermoelectric materials. The inset shows the larger version of the zT values of CNT-based materials. Error bars represent the standard deviation. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Together with good mechanical properties, the Ag2Se network also possesses superior thermoelectric performance (Fig. 2h). It displays a similar Seebeck coefficient (~−130 μV K−1) and much lower thermal conductivity (~0.04 W m−1 K−1, Fig. S11) compared with that of Ag2Se bulk materials at room temperature56,57. A high room-temperature zT ~ 0.11 is achieved, which is one or two orders of magnitude higher than the previously reported three-dimensional flexible thermoelectric materials based on polymer composites18,40,41,5865 (Fig. 2i), indicating that structuring inorganic material is also another viable pathway to develop three-dimensional flexible thermoelectric materials.

Ag2Se network-based device

The ultralow thermal conductivity of the Ag2Se network is highly desirable for the FTEG. First, it endows the FTEG with a superior ability to establish temperature difference, unlike the bulk-based FTEG, which has to enlarge the temperature difference by increasing the leg height, decreasing the fill factor (the percentage of total FTEG area occupied by the thermoelectric legs) or imposing a heat sink. This advantage is native to the network-based FTEG without additional weight, volume, or power. By finite element simulation, we compared the temperature distribution between the network-based FTEG, the full-filled bulk-based FTEG and the 10% filled FTEG at the same thickness of 3 mm (Fig. 3a–c). The completely filled and 10% filled bulk-based FTEGs are made up of Bi2Te3-based thermoelectric legs and PDMS (Polydimethylsiloxane) matrix, which are common in the previous works66,67. The network-based FTEG shows a large temperature difference of ~6.5 K, one order higher than the full-filled bulk-based FTEG and three times higher than the 10% filled FTEG. Second, the Ag2Se network-based FTEG can maintain normal body surface temperature during operation, which is essential but often unconsidered. To maximize the output power, it is better to use FTEGs in a cold environment. Suffering from the high thermal conduction or the heat sink cooling, the temperature drop in body surface caused by the low hot-side temperature is a significant complication for bulk-based FTEG, which can be avoided in the network-based FTEG as its interior low thermal conduction can prevent heat loss. According to the simulated temperature field (Fig. 3a–c), the network-based FTEG’s hot side temperature (~304 K) is closer to skin temperature (306 K) than the bulk-based FTEGs. We also compared the output performance by simulation at different ambient temperatures from 273 K to 305 K (Fig. 3d, e). A great increase in the open-circuit voltage of the network-based FTEG appears in comparison to the bulk-based FTEGs due to the larger temperature difference (Fig. 3d). Consequently, the power density (output power per unit area) of the network-based FTEG is similar to that of the 10% filled FTEG (Fig. 3e). The infrared image of the network-based FTEG wore on the arm experimentally demonstrates the obvious low temperature on the Ag2Se network’s surface (Fig. 3f). Although the tested voltage and power density of a network-based FTEG attached on the arm are slightly lower than the simulated results (Fig. 3g, h), which is because of the contact resistance, the power density of network-based FTEG is several order higher than that of PEDOT- or CNT-based FTEGs and is even on par with high-performance bulk-based FTEGs25,29,32,37,66,6873 (Fig. 3i). Additionally, the device demonstrates excellent reliability and can operate continuously for 50 h without degradation in output performance (Fig. S12).

Fig. 3. Output performance of Ag2Se network-based FTEG.

Fig. 3

The simulated internal temperature distribution of the full filled (a), 10% filled (b) bulk FTEGs and the network-based FTEG (c) at an ambient temperature of 290 K. Further simulation details are provided in the supplementary materials. d, e, The simulated single leg voltage and power density in an ambient temperature range from 273 K to 305 K. f The infrared image and optical photograph (inset) of a network-based FTEG dressed on a human wrist. The top electrode was removed to avoid the effect caused by its low emissivity. g, h The measured voltage and power density at an ambient temperature of 290 K and 297 K. Inset shows a device under test. i Summary of the FTEG’s power generation at different ambient temperatures. All the measurements were performed on human skin without heat sinks. Red line and red circles respectively represent the simulated and measured values of the Ag2Se network-based FTEG. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

The excellent output performance of network-based FTEG is complemented by portability and scalability, which encourages us to take one step further toward FTEG’s practical use. We replaced a portion of the filler (20 × 20 cm2) in a commercial jacket with the network-based FTEG with 40 legs in series to verify the actual effect (Fig. 4a–c and Fig. S15). Promisingly, most of the device’s performance can be preserved even under such a non-ideal condition including the presence of hand-arranged module gaps, and the untight touching between the module’s hot side and skin surface (Fig. 4, d, e). When the wearer was sitting stationary in an indoor environment at 290 K, the maximum power of the thermoelectric jacket was ~0.6 mW. The output power increased to ~1 mW when the wearer was walking at a speed of 1 m s−1. In addition, although the thermal bypass in the current configuration of the FTEG module based on one-type TE leg has a negligible effect on the temperature difference (Fig. S16), the increased internal resistance is inevitable. To further enhance the output power, a thick electrode would be utilized in this module, resulting in the larger thermal bypass. We assembled the device with two p-type Bi2Te3-based legs and two n-type Ag2Se-based networks (Device size: 4.1 × 2.6 cm2) to estimate the possible performance of the device, and the tested results are shown in Fig. S17. As expected, the TEG with an n-p design exhibits higher performance. A voltage of ~15 mV and a power density of ~1.7 μW cm−2 can be reached, even if its geometric is not particularly optimized, exceeding the performance of the presented single-leg device (with a voltage of ~0.44 mV and a power density of ~1.2 μW cm−2) at the same ambient temperature of 297 K. However, the weight and portability of the TEG with rigid p-type Bi2Te3 would have deteriorated in comparison with the network-based device. Consequently, developing matched flexible p-type materials is really necessary.

Fig. 4. Thermoelectric jacket and fabrics.

Fig. 4

a A thermoelectric jacket filled with the Ag2Se network-based FTEG. b Detailed photograph of the thermoelectric-device area. c Schematic of the thermoelectric modules in series. d, e The thermoelectric jacket’s open-circuit voltage and output power under different thermal conditions. fh The optical photos and morphologies (inset) of various thermoelectric fabrics. Further micrographs and thermoelectric performances are shown in Figs. S13 and S14. Ruler scale unit: mm. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

The two-step impregnation method, shown here for the Ag2Se network, can also be applied to fabric substrates, including cotton, linen, and silk (Fig. 4f–h and Figs. S11, S18S19). The technique thus allows ordinary cloth or clothing to be easily processed into personalized thermoelectric devices for the power supply or thermoregulation. The diverse possibilities enable the two-step impregnation technique, a universal strategy for making wearable thermoelectric products. Additionally, some compatible techniques or materials are deserved to be investigated. For instance, substituting liquid metal electrodes for copper electrodes to meet the Ag2Se network’s elasticity, and developing p-type thermoelectric materials using similar techniques to pair with n-type Ag2Se.

Methods

Preparation of the three-dimensional Ag2Se network and the network-based FTEG

Template preprocessing

A high-density melamine foam (Basotect; BASF) was first rinsed in NaOH solution (80 g/L) for 30 min, and then cleaned with deionized water. Tin (II) chloride dihydrate (SnCl2·2H2O, 98%; Innochem) was dissolved in deionized water (40 g/L) to make Sn2+ solution, followed by the addition of hydrochloric acid (AR; Xilong Scientific) until the solution is clear. The template was then immersed into Sn2+ solution for 2 h and transferred into deionized water for rinsing. Finally, the treated template dried naturally.

Silvering

Glucose monohydrate (C6H12O6·H2O, AR; Hushi), potassium sodium tartrate tetrahydrate (C4H4O6KNa·4H2O, AR, 99%; Aladdin), and PEG1000 (CP, Hushi) were dissolved in a diluted ethanol solution to make a reductant. The concentrations of C6H12O6·H2O, C4H4O6KNa·4H2O, PEG1000, and ethanol were 40 g/L, 14 g/L, 0.1 g/L, and 100 g/L, respectively. The Tollens’ reagent was prepared by dissolving silver nitrate (AgNO3, 98%; TBHX) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH, AR; Xilong Scientific) in an ammonium hydroxide solution (AR; Macklin). The aforementioned template was impregnated into the mixture of reductant and Tollens’ reagent, and squeezed gently to extrude the residual bubbles. After soaking for 5 h, the obtained silver network was washed and dried. It should be pointed out that the reaction rate and the number of reaction times will affect the silver loading and further influence the Ag2Se loading. Therefore, we adjusted the silver load by changing ammonia concentration and reaction times with a fixed AgNO3 concentration of 50 g/L and NaOH concentration of 25 g/L (Fig. S1).

Selenization

To prepare the selenium solution, sodium sulfide nonahydrate (Na2S·9H2O, 98%; Aladdin) and selenium powder (Se, 99.9%; Innochem) were dissolved into deionized water with concentrations of 60 g/L and 20 g/L, respectively. The above-mentioned silver network was then impregnated into the selenium solution for 10 h to synthesize the Ag2Se network. Considering the reaction efficiency, the subsequent samples were prepared based on an ammonia concentration of ~4.5 mol/L and two repetitions. The color changes in reaction process are shown in Fig. S2. The large-scale preparation was carried out in a polypropylene tank with a size of 2000 × 1000 × 100 mm3.

Fabrication of the network-based FTEG

The 10 μm-thick copper foils were used as electrodes, connected with the Ag2Se networks by silver paste (05002; SPI). A FTEG module including 40 thermoelectric legs of the Ag2Se networks was prepared in series, which was utilized to assemble a thermoelectric network-filled jacket by partially replacing the jacket’s filler.

Characterization of the material and device

Material characterization

The porosity of the Ag2Se network was measured based on the Archimedes method by a density balance (BSA224S-CW; Sartorius). Morphology and energy dispersive spectrum of the Ag2Se network were observed by field emission scanning electron microscopy (Gemini Crossbeam 350; ZEISS). The crystal structure was determined by X-ray diffraction (SmartLab; Rigaku) using Cu Kα radiation in the 2θ range of 10–70° at 40 kV and 200 mA. The mechanical properties were tested by a stress–strain apparatus (HTS-LLY920C; Zhongye). The Seebeck coefficient (S) and electrical resistivity (ρ) of Ag2Se networks with or without strain were measured simultaneously on a commercial system (ZEM-3; Advance Riko). The room-temperature thermal conductivity (κ) was determined by the hot wire method on a thermal conductivity meter (TC3000E; XIATECH). The given results are the mean of three measurements taken from the same sample. Optical bandgap was obtained on a Fourier transform IR reflectance spectrometer (Nicolet iS50; Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with an integrating sphere coated with gold (Pike).

Simulation

The output performance for the bulk-based and network-based FTEGs was simulated using the thermoelectric module in COMSOL. All simulations were performed under natural convection conditions (Fig. S13). We also calculated the open-circuit voltage (U) and power density (p) of the network-based FTEG with different thicknesses. According to the simulated results (Fig. S14), a module thickness of 3 mm was adopted in the experiments. The material parameters used in the simulation were summarized in Table S2.

Network-based FTEG characterization

The output properties were measured in homemade equipment connected with two electricity meters (2400 and 2182; Keithley). The IR image was captured using a thermal IR imager (T620; FLIR). The ambient temperature and wind speed were recorded by a portable weather station (PWS; Qingyi).

Ethics and inclusion statement

The authors declare that their study was approved by Harbin Institute of Technology (Protocol number: HIT-2022012), and they have obtained informed consent for publication from all participants.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary (67.5KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

Q.Z. acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51971081, 52172194), the Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Guangdong Province of China (2020B1515020023), the Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Shenzhen (RCJC20210609103733073), and Shenzhen Fundamental Research Program (JCYJ20200109113418655). Z.L. acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12074093) and the Open Fund of Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Electrochemical Energy Storage Technologies (No. EEST2019-1). F.C. acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51871081), Shenzhen Fundamental Research Program (GXWD20201230155427003-20200801190929005, JCYJ20220818102408017), and Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (KQTD20200820113045081).

Source data

Source Data (2.6MB, xlsx)

Author contributions

Q.Z., Z.L., F.C., and Y.L. designed this work. Y.L. and X.W. synthesized the Ag2Se network and conducted the transport property measurements. Y.L. and S.H. fabricated the network-based thermoelectric generators and conducted the output performance tests. Y.L., Z.W., and J.W fabricated the thermoelectric jacket. Q.Z., Z.L., F.C., Y.L., and J.M. discussed the results. Y.L., Q.Z., F.C., and J.M. wrote this manuscript and all authors edited it.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Mona Zebarjadi and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Data availability

All data are available in the main text or the supplementary materials. Source data are provided with this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Yijie Liu, Xiaodong Wang.

Contributor Information

Qian Zhang, Email: zhangqf@hit.edu.cn.

Zhiguo Liu, Email: liuzhiguo@hit.edu.cn.

Feng Cao, Email: caofeng@hit.edu.cn.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-023-38852-4.

References

  • 1.2022 Global Innovation Markets Forecast. (Perry/Hope Partners 2022).
  • 2.Liu, R., Wang, Z. L., Fukuda, K. & Someya, T. Flexible self-charging power sources. Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 870–886 (2022).
  • 3.Dong K, et al. Shape adaptable and highly resilient 3D braided triboelectric nanogenerators as e-Textiles for power and sensing. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:2868. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16642-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wang ZL. On Maxwell’s displacement current for energy and sensors: the origin of nanogenerators. Mater. Today. 2017;20:74–82. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2016.12.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang ZL, Song JH. Piezoelectric nanogenerators based on zinc oxide nanowire arrays. Science. 2006;312:242–246. doi: 10.1126/science.1124005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fan X, et al. Wire-shaped flexible dye-sensitized solar cells. Adv. Mater. 2008;20:592–595. doi: 10.1002/adma.200701249. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bi C, Chen B, Wei H, DeLuca S, Huang J. Efficient flexible solar cell based on composition-tailored hybrid perovskite. Adv. Mater. 2017;29:1605900. doi: 10.1002/adma.201605900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shi XL, Zou J, Chen ZG. Advanced thermoelectric design: from materials and structures to devices. Chem. Rev. 2020;120:7399–7515. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chen G, Li Y, Bick M, Chen J. Smart textiles for electricity generation. Chem. Rev. 2020;120:3668–3720. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gao M, et al. Power generation for wearable systems. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021;14:2114–2157. doi: 10.1039/D0EE03911J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jia Y, et al. Wearable thermoelectric materials and devices for self-powered electronic systems. Adv. Mater. 2021;33:e2102990. doi: 10.1002/adma.202102990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Poudel B, et al. High-thermoelectric performance of nanostructured bismuth antimony telluride bulk alloys. Science. 2008;320:634–638. doi: 10.1126/science.1156446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Epstein AS, Kulifay SM, Stearns RI. Energy gap of beta silver selenide. Nature. 1964;203:856. doi: 10.1038/203856b0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Russ, B., Glaudell, A., Urban, J. J., Chabinyc, M. L. & Segalman, R. A. Organic Thermoelectric materials for energy harvesting and temperature control. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16050 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.50 (2016).
  • 15.He J, Tritt TM. Advances in thermoelectric materials research: looking back and moving forward. Science. 2017;357:eaak9997. doi: 10.1126/science.aak9997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kim GH, Shao L, Zhang K, Pipe KP. Engineered doping of organic semiconductors for enhanced thermoelectric efficiency. Nat. Mater. 2013;12:719–723. doi: 10.1038/nmat3635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lee HJ, et al. Enhanced thermoelectric performance of PEDOT:PSS/PANI–CSA polymer multilayer structures. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016;9:2806–2811. doi: 10.1039/C5EE03063C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang L, et al. Three-dimensional tubular graphene/polyaniline composites as high-performance elastic thermoelectrics. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2017;150:135–140. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.07.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yao Q, Wang Q, Wang L, Chen L. Abnormally enhanced thermoelectric transport properties of SWNT/PANI hybrid films by the strengthened PANI molecular ordering. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014;7:3801–3807. doi: 10.1039/C4EE01905A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Khan ZU, et al. Thermoelectric polymers and their elastic aerogels. Adv. Mater. 2016;28:4556–4562. doi: 10.1002/adma.201505364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Venkatasubramanian R, Siivola E, Colpitts T, O’Quinn B. Thin-film thermoelectric devices with high room-temperature figures of merit. Nature. 2001;413:597–602. doi: 10.1038/35098012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hinterleitner B, et al. Thermoelectric performance of a metastable thin-film heusler alloy. Nature. 2019;576:85. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1751-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jin Q, et al. Flexible layer-structured Bi2Te3 thermoelectric on a carbon nanotube scaffold. Nat. Mater. 2019;18:62–68. doi: 10.1038/s41563-018-0217-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Liang J, et al. Flexible thermoelectrics: from silver chalcogenides to full-inorganic devices. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019;12:2983–2990. doi: 10.1039/C9EE01777A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nan K, et al. Compliant and stretchable thermoelectric coils for energy harvesting in miniature flexible devices. Sci. Adv. 2018;4:eaau5849. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau5849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ding Y, et al. High performance n-Type Ag2Se film on nylon membrane for flexible thermoelectric power generator. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:841. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08835-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lei Y, et al. Microstructurally tailored thin beta-Ag2Se films toward commercial flexible thermoelectrics. Adv. Mater. 2022;34:e2104786. doi: 10.1002/adma.202104786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hou S, et al. High performance wearable thermoelectric generators using Ag2Se films with large carrier mobility. Nano Energy. 2021;87:106223. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106223. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ren W, et al. High-performance wearable thermoelectric generator with self-healing, recycling, and lego-like reconfiguring capabilities. Sci. Adv. 2021;7:eabe0586. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe0586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Oh JY, et al. Chemically exfoliated transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheet-based wearable thermoelectric generators. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016;9:1696–1705. doi: 10.1039/C5EE03813H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kim N, et al. Elastic conducting polymer composites in thermoelectric modules. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:1424. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15135-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hong S, et al. Wearable thermoelectrics for personalized thermoregulation. Sci. Adv. 2019;5:eaaw0536. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw0536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kim CS, et al. Structural design of a flexible thermoelectric power generator for wearable applications. Appl. Energy. 2018;214:131–138. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lee B, et al. High-performance compliant thermoelectric generators with magnetically self-assembled soft heat conductors for self-powered wearable electronics. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:5948. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19756-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yang Y, et al. Stretchable nanolayered thermoelectric energy harvester on complex and dynamic surfaces. Nano Lett. 2020;20:4445–4453. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Liu Y, et al. A wearable real-time power supply with a Mg3Bi2-based thermoelectric module. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2021;2:100412. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100412. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Liu Y, et al. Passive radiative cooling enables improved performance in wearable thermoelectric generators. Small. 2022;18:e2106875. doi: 10.1002/smll.202106875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wang Y, et al. Flexible thermoelectric materials and generators: challenges and innovations. Adv. Mater. 2019;31:e1807916. doi: 10.1002/adma.201807916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hansen T, et al. Highly stretchable and conductive polymer material made from poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) and polyuretane elastomers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010;17:3069–3073. doi: 10.1002/adfm.200601243. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang X, Liang L, Lv H, Zhang Y, Chen G. Elastic aerogel thermoelectric generator with vertical temperature-difference architecture and compression-induced power enhancement. Nano Energy. 2021;90:106577. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106577. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kang YH, et al. Highly flexible and durable thermoelectric power generator using CNT/PDMS foam by rapid solvent evaporation. Small. 2022;18:e2106108. doi: 10.1002/smll.202106108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tian R, Liu Y, Koumoto K, Chen J. Body heat powers future electronic skins. Joule. 2019;3:1399–1403. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2019.03.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Proto A, Penhaker M, Conforto S, Schmid M. Nanogenerators for human body energy harvesting. Trends Biotechnol. 2017;35:610–624. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Oshima K, Tollens B. Ueber spectral‐reactionen des methylfurfurols. Ber. Dtsch. Chemischen Ges. 1901;34:1425–1426. doi: 10.1002/cber.19010340212. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sasakura C, Suzuki KT. Biological interaction between transition metals (Ag, Cd and Hg), selenide/sulfide and selenoprotein P. J. Inorg. Biochem. 1998;71:159–162. doi: 10.1016/S0162-0134(98)10048-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.De Minjer CH, Boom PFJVD. The nucleation with SnCl2‐PdCl2 solutions of glass before electroless plating. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1973;120:1644. doi: 10.1149/1.2403321. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kolb ED, Laudise RA. The solubility of trigonal Se in Na2S solutions and the hydrothermal growth of Se. J. Cryst. Growth. 1971;8:191–196. doi: 10.1016/0022-0248(71)90141-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gates B, et al. Synthesis and characterization of crystalline Ag2Se nanowires through a template‐engaged reaction at room temperature. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2002;12:679–686. doi: 10.1002/1616-3028(20021016)12:10&#x0003c;679::AID-ADFM679&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-#. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Guo CF, Ren Z. Flexible transparent conductors based on metal nanowire networks. Mater. Today. 2015;18:143–154. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2014.08.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ye T, et al. A tissue-like soft all-hydrogel battery. Adv. Mater. 2022;34:2105120. doi: 10.1002/adma.202105120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ohm Y, et al. An electrically conductive silver–polyacrylamide–alginate hydrogel composite for soft electronics. Nat. Electron. 2021;4:185–192. doi: 10.1038/s41928-021-00545-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kim J, Ghaffari R, Kim D-H. The quest for miniaturized soft bioelectronic devices. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2017;1:0049. doi: 10.1038/s41551-017-0049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Park SI, et al. Soft, stretchable, fully implantable miniaturized optoelectronic systems for wireless optogenetics. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015;33:1280–1286. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Tybrandt K, et al. HiGh-density stretchable electrode grids for chronic neural recording. Adv. Mater. 2018;30:e1706520. doi: 10.1002/adma.201706520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hou S, et al. High-performance, thin-film thermoelectric generator with self-healing ability for body-heat harvesting. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2022;3:101146. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.101146. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Jood P, Chetty R, Ohta M. Structural stability enables high thermoelectric performance in room temperature Ag2Se. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2020;8:13024–13037. doi: 10.1039/D0TA02614J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Li D, Zhang JH, Li JM, Zhang J, Qin XY. High thermoelectric performance for an Ag2Se-based material prepared by a wet chemical method. Mater. Chem. Front. 2020;4:875–880. doi: 10.1039/C9QM00487D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zhao L, et al. Enhanced thermoelectric properties of hybridized conducting aerogels based on carbon nanotubes and pyrolyzed resorcinol–formaldehyde resin. Synth. Met. 2015;205:64–69. doi: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2015.03.036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lee MH, Kang YH, Kim J, Lee YK, Cho SY. Freely Shapable and 3D porous carbon nanotube foam using rapid solvent evaporation method for flexible thermoelectric power generators. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019;9:1900914. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201900914. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kim MH, et al. Thermoelectric energy harvesting electronic skin (e-Skin) patch with reconfigurable carbon nanotube clays. Nano Energy. 2021;87:106156. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106156. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tan D, et al. Carbon nanoparticle hybrid aerogels: 3D double-interconnected network porous microstructure, thermoelectric, and solvent-removal functions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017;9:21820–21828. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b04938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Okada N, et al. Thermoelectric properties of Poly(3-hexylthiophene) nanofiber aerogels with a giant Seebeck coefficient. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2020;3:455–463. doi: 10.1021/acsapm.0c01185. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Sun X, et al. Ultralight conducting PEDOT:PSS/carbon nanotube aerogels doped with silver for thermoelectric materials. Sci. China Mater. 2017;60:159–166. doi: 10.1007/s40843-016-5132-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wang X, et al. Efficient DMSO-vapor annealing for enhancing thermoelectric performance of PEDOT:PSS-based aerogel. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019;11:2408–2417. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b19168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Fan W, Liang L, Zhang B, Guo C-Y, Chen G. PEDOT thermoelectric composites with excellent power factors prepared by 3-phase interfacial electropolymerization and carbon nanotube chemical doping. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2019;7:13687–13694. doi: 10.1039/C9TA03153G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Suarez F, et al. Flexible thermoelectric generator using bulk legs and liquid metal interconnects for wearable electronics. Appl. Energy. 2017;202:736–745. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.181. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ozturk et al. Designing thermoelectric generators for self-powered wearable electronics. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 2099–2113 (2016).
  • 68.Zhou Q, et al. Leaf-inspired flexible thermoelectric generators with high-temperature difference utilization ratio and output power in ambient air. Adv. Sci. 2021;8:2004947. doi: 10.1002/advs.202004947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Xu X, et al. Three-dimensional helical inorganic thermoelectric generators and photodetectors for stretchable and wearable electronic devices. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2018;6:4866–4872. doi: 10.1039/C8TC01183D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kim SJ, We JH, Cho BJ. A wearable thermoelectric generator fabricated on a glass fabric. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014;7:1959–1965. doi: 10.1039/c4ee00242c. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ito M, Koizumi T, Kojima H, Saito T, Nakamura M. From materials to device design of a thermoelectric fabric for wearable energy harvesters. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2017;5:12068–12072. doi: 10.1039/C7TA00304H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Wang Y, Shi Y, Mei D, Chen Z. Wearable thermoelectric generator to harvest body heat for powering a miniaturized accelerometer. Appl. Energy. 2018;215:690–698. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Yuan X, et al. Bi2Te3-based wearable thermoelectric generator with high power density: from structure design to application. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2022;10:6456–6463. doi: 10.1039/D2TC00426G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Reporting Summary (67.5KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All data are available in the main text or the supplementary materials. Source data are provided with this paper.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES