Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 May 31;18(5):e0286274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286274

Extraction, phytochemical characterization and anti-cancer mechanism of Haritaki churna: An ayurvedic formulation

Md Rafi Uz Zama Khan 1, Emiko Yanase 2, Vishal Trivedi 1,*
Editor: Chun-Hua Wang3
PMCID: PMC10231837  PMID: 37256897

Abstract

Haritaki churna (HC), a single herb ayurvedic formulations is known to be prescribed for various gastro-intestinal disorders in Ayurveda. Haritaki churna aqueous extract (HCAE) has anti-cancer activity against different types of cancer cells with an IC50 in the range of 50–97 μg/ml. Bioavailability of Haritaki Churna is very high in digestive track and treatment of colorectal cancer cells HCT-116, DLD1, HT-29 with HCAE reduces its cellular viability with anti-cancer IC50 70μg/ml. HCAE consumption is safe for human as it didn’t affect the cellular viability of primary human PBMCs or non-cancerogenic HEK-293 cells. Haritaki churna was found to be stable in biological gastric fluids and bioactive agents are not losing their anti-cancer activity under such harsh conditions. The HPLC Chromatogram of HCAE is giving 13 major peaks and 11 minor peaks. Exploiting LC-MS, IR and NMR spectroscopic techniques, a total of 13 compounds were identified from HCAE namely Shikimic acid, Chebulic acid, gallic acid, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, Protocatechuic acid, 4-O-galloyl-shikimic Acid, 5-O-galloyl-shikimic Acid, Methylgallate, corilagin, 1, 2, 6, Tri-O-galloyl β-D-glucose, chebulagic acid, chebulinic acid, and Ellagic acid. Reconstitution and subtraction of phytochemicals from the mixture indicate that Ellagic acid significantly contribute into anti-cancer effect of HCAE. Cancer cells treated with ellagic acid from HCAE were incapable of completing their cell-cycle and halted the cell-cycle at DNA synthesis S-Phase, as demonstrated by decreased cyclin A2 expression levels with increasing ellagic acid concentration. Halting of cells at S-phase causes induction of apoptosis in cancer cells. Cancer cells exhibiting DNA fragmentation, changes in expression of several apoptotic proteins such as Bcl2, cytochrome-c and formation of cleaved products of caspase 3 and PARP-1 suggests ellagic acid induces cell death via mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis.

1 Introduction

‘Ayurvedic medicine’ or ‘ayurveda’ known as the traditional medicine of India makes both herbal and metallic formulations using plants, animals and mineral sources as medicines for various ailments [1]. It is practiced successfully in many countries. Many therapeutic products have been extracted from plants which are mentioned in ayurvedic literature. Ayurvedic formulations are shown to have anti-oxidant [2], anti-diabetic [3], anti-inflammatory [4], anti-asthmatic [5], anti-arthritic [6], anti-pyretic [7], immunomodulatory [8],neuroprotective [9], anti-cancer [1012],anti-obesity [13], and gastro-protective [14] properties. Triphala, which is made from equal parts of the fruits Haritaki (Terminalia chebula Retz.), Bibhitaki (Terminalia bellerica Gaertn.), and amla (Emblica officinalis Gaertn.), is central to studies on ayurvedic formulations. Triphala has been extensively studied and is shown to have numerous properties [1519]. Haritaki churna (HC) is a single herb ayurvedic formulation consisting of plant material from Terminalia chebula Retz. Haritaki is composed of a variety of phytochemicals such as polyphenols, terpenoids, terpenes, flavonoids, sterols etc. [20]. Haritaki churna is a form of powdered formulation and its plant source has been predominantly used for treatment of gastro-intestinal disorders such as indigestion, gastritis, ulcers, constipation, vomiting, colic pain, gastro-intestinal disorders among other malaises [21]. There have been no studies reported on the efficacy of Haritaki churna to support its claim of being an ayurvedic medicine to treat gastro-intestinal illnesses. With this hindsight, we aimed to investigate the anti-cancer potential on several cancer cell lines such as colorectal cancer (HCT-116, DLD1 and HT-29), cervical cancer (HeLa), breast cancer (MDAMB-231), and osteosarcoma (MG-63) in light of its applications and localized effects on gastro-intestinal related illnesses. We also intended at isolating & characterizing the major chemical compounds present in it and the most active ingredient/s from its rich phytochemical content. This study found that aqueous extract of Haritaki churna is completely capable of killing cancer cells, which can be attributed to the presence of several bioactive compounds, the majority of which are polyphenols. A re-constitution and subtractive analysis of the compounds in the aqueous extract revealed that ellagic acid was the most potent ingredient in the composition. Further, it was also observed that ellagic acid is capable of arresting cell cycle progression in S-phase and induction of mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Chemicals

Haritaki churna was purchased from a local Baidyanath store in Guwahati, Assam, India. Dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium, 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and Percoll were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). DMSO (cell-culture grade), Foetal Bovine Serum (FBS), Penicillin-Streptomycin (100X) antibiotic solution, Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS), Sodium Azide, trypan blue, and trypsin were obtained from HiMedia (Mumbai, India). All the cell culture plates and dishes were purchased from Corning, Lowell, MA, USA. MDAMB-231 (Breast cancer cell line), DLD-1 (Colorectal cancer), HCT-116 (Colorectal cancer), HT-29 (Colorectal cancer), MG-63 (Osteosarcoma), HeLa (Cervical cancer), and HEK-293 (Kidney epithelial) cell lines were procured from National Centre for Cell Sciences, Pune, India.Acetone-d6 (Deuterated acetone), DMSO-d6 (Deuterated DMSO), CD3OD (Deuterated methanol), and D2O (Deuterated water) were purchased from Kanto Chemical Co. Inc. Tokyo, Japan. Pancreatin, Sodium taurocholate, lecithin, and maleic acid were procured from HiMedia (Mumbai, India). Glyceryl monooleate and sodium oleate were procured from sigmaaldrich. Apoptosis/necroptosis antibody sampler kit (cat. # 92570), and antibodies to cyclin A2, GAPDH were purchased from cell signaling technology, Inc (USA). Antibodies detecting β-actin (cat. # BB-AB0024), Bcl2 (cat. # BB-AB0230), PARP-1 (cat. # BB-AB0280) were procured from BioBharathi Life science private ltd (Ind.) Anti-Cytochrome-C (338200) antibody was procured from Invitrogen. Cyclin D1 (cat. # ab134175) was purchased from Abcam (UK). All other reagents and chemicals were of analytical grade purity.

2.2 Sample preparation for cell culture treatments

One gram of Haritaki churna was taken and dissolved in 5 ml of water. The mixture was kept for incubation at 37°C for 2 hrs at 150 rpm. The mixture was subjected to centrifugation for 10 min at 6000 rpm at room temperature. The procedure was repeated with 5 ml water. The supernatant was stored at 4⁰C until further use.

2.3 Cell culture

MDAMB-231 cells (Breast cancer cell line), HeLa (Cervical cancer cell line), DLD1, HT29, HCT-116 (Colon cancer cell lines), MG-63 (Osteosarcoma cell line), and HEK-293 (Human embryonic kidney) cells were cultured in DMEM: F12 High glucose media, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin antibiotic solution (100units/ml penicillin and 100μg/ml streptomycin sulfate). Cells were grown in humidified 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C.

2.4 MTT cell viability assay

One day prior to the treatment with HC aqueous extract, cancer cells (1x104) were seeded in 0.2ml complete medium overnight in 96 well dish. On the day of the experiments, cells were washed twice with cell culture grade phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and subjected to treatment with different concentration of HC aqueous extract (0–1000μg/ml) for 48hrs in serum-free medium. Post treatment, cells were washed with PBS twice and cell viability was measured by MTT assay as described previously [22, 23]. Images of the untreated and treated cells were taken from random 10 fields using the Cytell cell imaging system (GE healthcare).

2.5 Preparation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)

Blood was taken from a healthy volunteer and PBMCs were isolated using HiSeP from HiMediaTM [24] as per manufacturer’s protocol. The PBMC cells were re-suspended in DMEM-F12 high glucose medium supplemented with 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin antibiotic solution and 10% FBS. The cells were treated with varying concentrations of Haritaki churna aqueous extract and the cell viability of the PMBCs was calculated using MTT cell viability assay.

2.6 Preparation of dissolution media

2.6.1 Simulated gastric fluid (SGF)

Simulated gastric fluid was prepared as described [25]. In brief, 2 grams of sodium chloride is added to 600–700 ml of deionised or distilled water. The pH is then set to 1.2. After setting the pH, 3.2 grams of pepsin (800–1200 units per milligram of activity) is added and stirred until dissolved. The volume of the mixture is made up to 1 litre using deionised or distilled water.

2.6.2 Fasted state Simulated Intestinal Fluid (FaSSIF)

FaSSIF was prepared as described [25]. FaSSIF was prepared with sodium taurocholate (3 mM), lecithin, (0.2 mM), maleic acid (19.12 mM), sodium chloride (68.62 mM), and sodium hydroxide (34.8 mM) in 1 litre of deionized water with a pH of 6.5.

2.6.3 Fed state Simulated Intestinal Fluid (FeSSIF)

FeSSIF was prepared as described [25]. FeSSIF was prepared with sodium taurocholate (10 mM), lecithin, (2 mM), glyceryl momooleate (5mM), sodium oleate (0.8 mM), maleic acid (55.02 mM), sodium chloride (125.5 mM), and sodium hydroxide (81.65 mM) in 1 litre of deionized water with a pH of 5.8.

2.7 Phytochemical analysis of aqueous extract of Haritaki churna

The presence of phenolics, flavonoids, terpenoids, alkaloids and proteins in the HCAE was qualitatively analyzed using standard detection methods.

2.7.1 Total phenolic content (TPC)

The total phenolic content of HCAE was determined using folin-ciocalteau method as described [26]. Gallic acid (GA) was used as standard and the TPC of the extract is expressed in terms of mg GA equivalents/gram dry weight of extract.

2.7.2 Total flavonoid content (TFC)

The total flavonoid content of HCAE was estimated by the method as described [27]. Quercetin (Q) was used as a standard and the total flavonoid content was expressed in terms of mg Q equivalents/gram dry weight of extract.

2.7.3 Total alkaloid content (TAC)

The total alkaloid content of HCAE was determined using Dragendorff’s test as described [28]. Berberine (BE) was used as a standard and the total alkaloid content was expressed in terms of mg BE equivalents/gram dry weight of extract.

2.7.4 Total protein content (TPrC)

The total protein content of HCAE was estimated using Bradford assay as described [29]. BSA (Bovine serum albumin) was used as standard and the total protein content was expressed in terms of mg BSA equivalents/gram dry weight of extract.

2.7.5 Total terpenoid content (TTC)

The total terpenoid content of HCAE was determined using Salkowski’s test as described [30]. Enoxolone (EO) was used as a standard and the total terpenoid content was expressed in terms of mg EO equivalents/gram dry weight of extract.

2.8 Fractionation of Haritaki churna aqueous extract using reverse-phase open column chromatography

Open column chromatography was performed for the separation of fractions from the supernatant obtained by dissolving the ayurvedic formulation in water as discussed previously. The column is prepared with Diaion HP20SS (Mitsubishi chemical, Japan) resin. The column is filled with HP20SS resin to 20 cm in a 60 cm long column having an inner diameter of 1.5 cm. The column was then conditioned with water equivalent to four volumes of resin length. The sample was poured onto the resin and allowed to settle for few minutes. The column was then eluted serially with increasing ratio of methanol to water as follows: Fraction 1: Methanol-water (0:100), Fraction 2: Methanol-water (20:80), Fraction 3: Methanol-water (50:50), Fraction 4: Methanol-water (80:20), Fraction 5: Methanol-water (100:0). The fractions were dried using rotary evaporator and kept at 4⁰C for further use.

2.9 Gradient HPLC analysis

The High performance liquid chromatography analysis was used to determine the polyphenols present in the aqueous extract of Haritaki churna. The column used was YMC-TRIART C18- (4.6ID X 250mm) and the flow rate was maintained at 1mL/min. The oven temperature was kept constant at 35⁰C throughout the HPLC runtime and absorbance was recorded at 254nm. The mobile phases were A: acetonitrile (0.5% HCOOH) and B: water (0.5% HCOOH). The linear gradient of A in B from 0% to 100% over 30 minutes.

2.10 Isolation of individual compounds from reverse phased fractions

The five fractions obtained from open phase column chromatography were subjected to HPLC analysis. The solvent phases were optimized based on the gradient HPLC results. The fraction 1, fraction 2, fraction 3, fraction 4 and fraction 5 were run in 1% methanol, 5% methanol, 10% acetonitrile, 30% methanol and 20% acetonitrile in (0.5% HCOOH) acidified water respectively. The column used was YMC-TRIART C18-(4.6ID X 250mm), at a flow rate of 1mL/min. The column temperature was maintained at 35°C and absorbance was recorded at 254nm.

2.11 NMR analysis

1H, 13C NMR, and 2D NMR were recorded in JEOL ECA 500 spectrometer (500 MHz, JEOL Ltd, Tokyo Japan) and BRUKER Biospin AVANCEIII 600 (600 MHz, Bruker, Massachusetts, USA). The spectra were recorded in Acetone-d6, DMSO-d6, CD3OD, and D2O at 298K. The expression of coupling constants is in hertz and chemical shifts are represented by δ in (parts per million) ppm scale. Tetramethylsilane (TMS) was added to the samples which served as an internal standard.

2.12 Mass spectra analysis

Analysis was performed on a UPLC system coupled to a QTOF-MS (Waters Xevo G2 QTof, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) instrument operated in electrospray ionization (ESI) mode at a mass resolution of 20,000 and controlled by MassLynx 4.1 software. An Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column (2.1 mm I.D. x 100 mm, 1.7 μm, Waters, USA) at 35°C was used for chromatographic separation. The sample (1 μL) was injected using an autosampler. The mass spectrometer was calibrated with 0.5 mM sodium formate. Leucine enkephalin (2 μg/mL, m/z 554.2615 in negative mode) was used as lock spray at a flow rate of 10 μL/min. The collision energy equaled 6V. The source parameters were as follows: capillary voltage 2.5kV, sampling cone voltage 30V, extraction cone voltage 4V, source temperature 150⁰C, desolvation temperature 500⁰Cgas flow 1000L/h, cone gas flow 50L/h. The mass spectrum analysis was done using Waters Xevo G2 QTof. The column used is AQUITY UPLC BEH C18 1mm ID x 100mm.

2.13 Spectroscopic and mass spectrum data of compounds 1–13

Compound 1: -C7H10O5: Negative ESI-MS m/z = 173.0025 [M-H]-, 1H NMR (600MHz, D2O): δH6.82 (1H, brt, J = 2.4Hz), 4.45 (1H, brt, J = 4.2Hz), 4.04 (1H, m), 3.78 (1H, q, J = 8.4, 4.2Hz), 2.75 (1H, overlap), 2.23 (1H, dd, J = 18, 6.6Hz)

Compound 2: -C14H12O11: Negative ESI-MS m/z = 336.9633 [M-H]-, 337[M-H2O-H] -, 1H NMR (600MHz, D2O): δH7.2 (1H,s), 5.4 (1H, d, J = 1.2Hz), 4.01 (1H, dd,J = 7.8, 1.2Hz), 3.3 (1H, ddd, J = 14.4, 8.4, 6Hz), 2.9 (1H, dd, J = 17.4, 8.4Hz), 2.6 (1H, dd, J = 17.4, 6Hz).

Compound 3: -C7H6O5: Negative ESI-MS m/z = 168.9744 [M-H]-, 1H NMR (600MHz, D2O): δH7.08 (2H, s, H-2, H-6).

Compound 4: -C6H6O3: Negative ESI-MS m/z[M+H]+ = 108.9870, 1H NMR (600MHz, D2O): δH9.4 (1H, s), 7.5 (1H, brd, J = 3.35Hz), 6.6 (1H, brd, J = 3.4Hz), 4.8 (1H, s), 4.6 (1H, s).

Compound 5: -C7H6O4: Negative ESI-MS m/z [M-H]- = 153.0059, 1H NMR (600MHz, DMSO-d6): δH7.3 (1H, brd, J = 1.8Hz), 7.2 (1H, dd, J = 8.4, 1.8Hz), 6.7 (1H, d, J = 8.4Hz).

Compound 6: -C14H14O9: Negative ESI-MS m/z [M-H]- = 325.0143, 1H NMR (600MHz, Acetone-d6): δH7.08 (2H, s), 6.8 (1H, s), 5.35 (1H, dd, J = 11.4, 4.2Hz), 4.49 (1H, s), 4.02 (1H, m), 2.8 (1H, overlap), 2.4 (1H, dd, J = 18.6, 4.8Hz).

1H NMR (600MHz, Acetone-d6 + D2O): δH7.1 (2H, s), δ6.8 (1H, s), 5.3 (1H, m), 4.5 (1H, brs), 4.04 (1H, overlap), 2.86 (1H, dd, J = 17.4, 3.6Hz), 2.4 (1H, dd, J = 19.2, 4.8Hz).

Compound 7: -C14H14O9: Negative ESI-MS m/z [M-H]- = 325.0257, 1H NMR (600MHz, Acetone-d6): δH7.1 (2H, s), 6.8 (1H, brd, J = 3Hz), 5.78 (1H, m), 4.19 (1H, dd, J = 12.6, 4.8Hz), 4.03 (1H, dd, J = 6.6, 4.2Hz), 2.8 (1H, overlap), 2.32 (1H, m).

Compound 8: -C8H8O5: Negative ESI-MS m/z [M-H]- = 183.2640, 1H NMR (600MHz, CD3OD): δH7.055 (2H, s, H-2, H-6), 3.82 (3H, s).

Compound 9: -C27H22O18: Negative ESI-MS m/z [M-H]- = 634.0134, [2M-H]- = 1267.0637, 1H NMR (600MHz, CD3OD): δH7.055 (2H, s), 6.69 (1H, s), 6.66 (1H, s), 6.36 (1H, brs), 4.9 (1H, t, J = 10.8Hz), 4.8 (1H, overlap), 4.5 (1H, t, J = 9Hz), 4.4 (1H, brt, J = 1.4Hz), 4.15 (1H, dd, J = 10.8, 7.8Hz), 3.98 (1H, brd, J = 1.2Hz).

Compound 10: -C27H24O18: Negative ESI-MS m/z [M-H]- = 634.9866, [2M-H]- = 1271.1479, 1H NMR (600MHz, CD3OD): δH7.16, 7.14, 7.1 (each 2H, s), 5.8 (1H, d, J = 8.4Hz), 5.2 (1H, t, J = 9Hz), 4.59 (1H, dd, J = 11.4, 1.2Hz), 4.4 (1H, dd, J = 12.6, 6Hz), 3.89 (1H, ddd, J = 9.6, 4.8, 2.4Hz), 3.7–3.8 (2H, m).

Compound 11: -C41H30O27: Negative ESI-MS m/z [M-H]- = 953.5759, [2M-H]- = 1907.0813, 1H NMR (600MHz, CD3OD): δH7.47 (1H, s), 7.07 (2H, s), 6.84 (1H, s), 6.63 (1H, s), 6.5 (1H, s), 5.8 (1H, brs), 5.39 (1H, s), 5.23 (1H, s), 5.04 (1H, dd, J = 6.6, 1.2Hz), 4.3 (1H, dd, J = 10.8, 7.8Hz), 3.8 (1H, ddd, J = 11.89, 4.9, 3.6, 1.5Hz), 3.72 (1H, brs), 2.2 (1H, dd, J = 17.4, 3.6Hz), 2.1 (1H, dd, J = 16.8, 11.4Hz).

Compound 12: -C41H32O27: Negative ESI-MS m/z [M-H]- = 954.9651, [2M-H]- = 1911.1218, 1H NMR (600MHz, CD3OD): δH7.517 (1H, s), 7.18, 7.11, 6.96 (2H each, s, galloyl group), 6.5 (1H, d, J = 1.8Hz), 6.24 (1H, brs), 5.4 (1H, t, J = 5.4Hz), 5.11 (1H, dd, J = 7.2Hz, 1.8Hz), 5.05 (1H, d, J = 3.6Hz), 4.8 (1H, dd, J = 5.4, 2.4Hz), 4.7 (1H, t, J = 6.6Hz), 4.6 (1H, dd, J = 11.4, 7.2Hz), 3.9 (1H, dd, J = 10.2, 4.2Hz), 2.2 (2H, d, J = 12Hz).

Compound 13: -C14H6O8: Negative ESI-MS m/z [M-H]- = 300.9498, 1H NMR (600 MHz, Acetone-d6): δH7.59 (2H, s).

2.14 Identification of the most active ingredient in HCAE

The concentrations of each compound identified from HCAE were evaluated by calculating area under the peak from gradient HPLC chromatogram. Based on the composition of HCAE obtained, different mixtures such as CM, C1′-C13′ were made. CM (Complete mixture) contained all the identified compounds which was formulated as per the composition. Mixture C1′ was made using all identified compounds except compound C1. Mixture C2′ was made using all identified compounds except compound C2 and so forth. The IC50 values of all the resultant mixtures were evaluated using MTT assay to find out the variations in their ability to kill cancer cells in a dose dependent manner.

2.15 Cell cycle analysis of cancer cells treated with Haritaki churna aqueous extract

Approximately 5 x 105 cells were seeded in a 6 well plate one night before the day of the experiment. The cells were treated with HC aqueous extract at their respective IC50 concentrations against HCT-116, DLD1, and HT-29. The cells were treated using serum-free media for 24 h, and cell cycle analysis was performed. FCS express software was used to analyse the different phases in the distribution of cells.

2.16 Live and apoptotic cell staining by acridine orange/propidium iodide method

The live and apoptotic cells were stained by acridine orange and propidium iodide as described previously [22, 23]. Approximately 1x105 cells were seeded in a 24-well plate one night before the day of the experiment. The cells were treated with HC aqueous extract in serum-free media at respective IC50 concentrations for HCT-116, DLD1, and HT-29 for 48 h. The healthy, early apoptotic, late apoptotic, and dead cells were analysed by using quadrant analysis.

2.17 DNA fragmentation assay

Approximately 5x105 cells were seeded in 100 mm plates one night before the day of the experiment. The cells were treated with respective IC50 concentrations for HCT-116, DLD1, and HT-29 cells in serum-free media for a period of 48 h. The cells grown in serum-free media were considered as control. DNA fragmentation analysis was performed as described previously [22, 23]. The DNA laddering was observed under UV light and images were taken in a BIO-RAD chemidocTM imaging system.

2.18 Western blotting

DLD1 (1*106) cells were seeded in a 6 well plate prior to the day of the experiment. Cells were washed twice with PBS and were treated with ellagic acid at concentrations of 2.5, 5, 10, 15 & 25 μg/ml for 24 and 48 hours. Cells were harvested and lysed with RIPA lysis buffer and the protein content was measured using standard protein assays. Proteins were separated on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and then transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad cat. # 162–0112) on a Trans-Blot Turbo (Bio-Rad). The membrane was blocked with 5% BSA for 1–2 hours at room temperature. The blots were then incubated with primary antibodies (RIP (1:2000), p-RIP (1:1000), MLKL (1:2000), p-MLKL (1:1000), Cleaved caspase 3 (1:2000), Caspase 3 (1:2000), Cleaved caspase 8 (1:2000), Caspase 8 (1:2000), Bcl2 (1:2000), PARP-1 (1:2000), Cytochrome-C (1:1000), Cyclin D1 (1:5000), CyclinA2 (1:4000) GAPDH (1:5000) and β-actin (1:5000)) overnight at 4°C followed by incubation with appropriate HRP conjugated secondary antibodies for 1–2 hours at room temperature. Proteins bands were analysed by using Bio-Rad ClarityTM Western ECL substrate kit and images were developed in Bio-Rad chemiDoc system.

2.19 Statistical analysis

Sample values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), N = 3. All the IC50 values were calculated using a non-linear curve fit model in ORIGIN 2019 software.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Haritaki churna aqueous extract has anti-cancer activity

In Ayurveda, it is recommended to soak Haritaki Churna (HC) into cold water for overnight and then the water extract can be consumed orally for maximum therapeutic effect. Considering this aspect, we have prepared the aqueous extract of HC as described in “section 2.2”. The aqueous extract of HC was tested against different cancer cells to evaluate the anti-cancer potential of formulation as described. Cells were treated with different concentrations of aqueous extract of HC for 48 hours and cell viability was measured by MTT assay. Cancer cells treated with aqueous extract of HC exhibits dose dependent loss of cellular viability and alternations in cellular morphology. The aqueous extract is giving anti-cancer activity against MDAMB-23, HeLa, & MG63 cells with an IC50 of 53.1 ± 4.96 μg/ml, 79.35 ± 4.95 μg/ml, & 97.04 ± 4.09 μg/ml respectively (Table 1).

Table 1. IC50 values of Haritaki churna aqueous extract for different cell lines.

Cell line Type IC50 (μg/ml)±S.D
MDAMB-231 Breast cancer 53.1 ± 4.96
HeLa Cervical cancer 79.35 ± 4.95
MG-63 Osteosarcoma 97.04 ± 4.09
HCT-116 Colorectal 92.69 ± 7.07
DLD1 Colorectal 70.41 ± 6.35
HT-29 Colorectal 379.93 ± 5.29
HEK-293 Embryonic >300
PBMCs Blood mononuclear >500

Note: Cancer cells, HEK-293 and PBMC (Peripheral blood mononuclear cells extracted from fresh blood samples) were treated with HCAE (0–1000 μg/ml) for a period of 48 h. The cellular viability was measured by MTT assay as described. The IC50 values were calculated using non-linear curve fit model in Origin 9 PRO software.

3.2 Haritaki churna aqueous extract induces dose-dependent loss of cellular viability in colon cancer cells

The Haritaki churna in the ayurvedic literature is well known for treating GI-track-related disorders. The concentration of bioactive agents present in HC will be very high in GI track and we have asked if the ayurvedic formulation could have potential to exhibit anti-cancer activity against colon cancer. To explore such question, we have treated the colon cancer cells HCT-116, DLD-1 and HT29 with aqueous extract of HC and measured the cellular viability by MTT assay. Cancer cells were treated with different concentration of HC and it exhibits dose-dependent killing of cancer cells (Fig 1). Among the three colon cancer cell lines, HCAE showed maximum activity towards DLD1 with an IC50 of 70.41 ± 6.35 μg/ml, whereas it showed IC50 of 92.69 ± 7.07 μg/ml against HCT-116and 379.93 ± 5.29 μg/ml against HT-29 (Table 1). In addition, treated cells were exhibiting membrane blebbing and distorted morphology indicating extreme stress inside the cells (Fig 1). The data in Fig 1 and Table 1 clearly highlight that the HC has bioactive agents with anti-cancer activity and it can be useful to treat colorectal cancer in patients.

Fig 1. Haritaki churna aqueous extract is effective against colon cancer cells.

Fig 1

Colon Cancer cells were treated with different concentration of Haritaki churna aqueous extract (0–1000 μg/ml) and the cell viability was measured by MTT assay. The MTT curve presented in (A)-(C) refer to the treatment of HCAE to HCT-116, DLD1 and HT-29 cells respectively. (D) Cells were observed under microscope and different images were acquired from different fields using Cytell cell imaging system (GE Healthcare). Representative images from each treatment were presented.

3.3 Haritaki churna aqueous extract is safe for normal human cells

The major drawback of studies with ayurvedic formulation is systematic exploration of many pharmacological properties such bio-availability, distribution safety and toxicity etc. Before exploring the composition and purification of bioactive anti-cancer agents present in HC aqueous extract, we have performed safety and toxicity analysis. We have used two different models to test the safety and toxicity of HC aqueous extract. In model 1, we have tested the safety of the HC extract using primary cells. The use of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) has been widely accepted as an in-vitro model for testing the safety of anti-cancer drugs [3134]. PBMCs were isolated from human blood as described and sub-cultured in DMEM complete medium. PBMCs were treated with different concentration of HC aqueous extract (0–500μg/ml) and cellular viability was measured by MTT assay. We found that HCAE is not affecting cellular viability of PBMCs even at a very high concentration of 500μg/ml (Fig 2A). Alteration in cellular morphology is a primary event to monitor the safety of the anti-cancer drug. Observation of HC aqueous extract treated PBMCs indicate no significant alternation in cellular morphology (Fig 2B). In model 2, non-cancerous cell line HEK293 was used to test the toxicity of HC aqueous extract. HEK 293 cells were treated with different concentration of HC extract and cellular viability was measured by MTT assay. HC aqueous extract had not affected the cellular viability of HEK-293 cells up to concentration of 300 μg/ml. Blebbing in HEK-293 cells treated with higher concentration (500μg/ml) of HCAE was observed (Fig 2B). However, these protrusions have been found in HEK-293 cells at doses greater than those necessary to kill colorectal cancer cells. Our results comply with the study done by suganthy et al, where the activity of methanolic extracts of Terminalia chebula fruit (TCF), Terminalia arjuna bark (TAB), and 7-methylgallate(7-MG) was checked on PBMCs [35]. They showed that there was no significant decrease in the viability and membrane integrity of PBMCs upon treatment by TCF, TAB & 7MG even at concentrations of 500–2000 μg/ml.

Fig 2. Haritaki churna aqueous extract is safe for human consumption.

Fig 2

(A) The peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from healthy volunteer as described. The cells treated with Haritaki churna aqueous extract for a period of 48 hours and their cell viability was measured by MTT assay as given in the procedure. (B) HEK-293 and PBMC Cells were observed and 5 different random images were taken using Cytell cell imaging system (GE Healthcare). Representative images are shown for untreated and treated cells.

3.4 Aqueous extract of Haritaki churna has several bioactive agents

One gram of Haritaki churna yielded 539.6 ± 14.5 mg of aqueous extract when extracted as per the procedure mentioned in section 2.2. The hydrophilic contents present in the ayurvedic formulation are the principal ingredients as the water extract constitutes approximately more than 50% of crude Haritaki churna powder. The qualitative phytochemical composition of the aqueous extract of HCAE was determined using several biochemical assays. The findings indicated that polyphenols, protein, alkaloids, flavonoids, and terpenoids are present. The polyphenol group of compounds were present in the highest amount (Fig 3). The TPC of HCAE was found to be 395.9 mg gallic acid equivalents/gram dry weight of extract. The gradient HPLC chromatogram of aqueous extract of Haritaki churna also confirmed the presence of polyphenols when it was spiked at 254nm. The HPLC chromatogram has 13 prominent peaks and 11 minor peaks. The major peaks have been labelled in the chromatogram (Fig 3). The several bioactive agents present in these peaks could be responsible for anti-cancer activity of the HC aqueous extract.

Fig 3. Haritaki churna are composed of different types of bioactive compounds.

Fig 3

The gradient HPLC chromatogram shows the presence of different bioactive compounds in Haritaki churna aqueous extract at 254 nm.

3.5 Fractionation and isolation of compounds from the aqueous extract of Haritaki churna

Further, the HC aqueous extract was serially eluted with solvents with varying polarity in an open column chromatography using HP20SS resin as described in section 2.8. The yields of fractions 1–5 have was calculated to be 140.4 ± 15.6 mg, 47.5 ± 3.09 mg, 157.6 ± 16.6 mg, 81.2 ± 7.02 mg, 10.2 ± 2.6 mg (S1 Data). The schematic of the procedure for separating the fractions using open column chromatography is illustrated in Fig 4A. The chromatograms of different fractions were developed and the obtained fractions were subjected to isocratic HPLC analysis for setting up the condition for isolation of individual compounds from the fractions. The fraction 1 has the most hydrophilic compounds whereas fraction 5 contains the most hydrophobic ones providing us a gradient advantage in separating compounds. The fraction 1 and fraction 4 contained two compounds each (compound 1 & 2 in fraction 1 and compound 11& 12 in fraction 4) whereas fraction 2 & 5 composed of one compound each. A copious number of compounds was present in fraction 3 which may be because of intermediary solubility in organic and aqueous solvents (Fig 4).

Fig 4. Extraction and fractionation of Haritaki churna aqueous extract.

Fig 4

(A) Schematic of the procedure followed for reverse phase open column chromatography. (B) Chromatogram for fraction 1. (C) Fraction2 (D) Fraction3. (E) Fraction4 (F) Fraction 5.

3.6 Structural elucidation of chemical compounds isolated from Haritaki churna aqueous extract (HCAE)

Chemical compounds present in HC aqueous extract was purified to homogeneity and purity was confirmed by spiking the compound in HPLC (S2 Data). The structure of purified compound was determined by spectroscopic techniques 1H NMR (600 MHz) and 13C NMR (600 MHz) along with 2D NMR techniques for some compounds. The molecular weight of compound was determined by using mass spectra UPLC system coupled to a QTOF-MS. Compound 1 showed a molecular ion peak at m/z 173.0025 [M-H]-. The molecular formula C7H10O5 was deduced using 1H NMR, LC-MS analysis and was identified as shikimic acid (Fig 5.1) by comparing it with already published literature [36]. Compound 2 showed two molecular ions at m/z 336.9633 [M-H]—and 354.9868 [M-H]-. The peak at m/z 336.9633 [M-H]-is due to the loss of water molecules from the parent molecule because of high ionization energy. The 1H, LC-MS analyses were used in deducing C14H12O11 and are identified as chebulic acid (Fig 5.2) by comparing it with already published literature [37]. Compound 3 showed the highest peak at m/z 168.9744 [M-H]-. C7H6O5 was deduced as the molecular formula by analysing the 1H NMR and was identified as gallic acid (Fig 5.3) by comparing it with already published literature [38]. Compound 4 showed molecular ion peaks at m/z 108.9870 [M+H]+, 127.0182 [M+H]+in positive mode. The peak at m/z 108.9870 [M]+ could be because of the loss of water molecules from the parent molecule because of high ionization energy. Molecular formula C6H6O3 was obtained by analysing 1H NMR and was identified as 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (Fig 5.4) by comparing it with already published literature [39]. Compound 5 showed the highest molecular ion peak at m/z 153.0059 [M-H]-. The 1H and LC-MS analysis helped us deduce the molecular formula as C7H6O4 and were identified as protocatechuic acid (Fig 5.5) after comparing it with published literature [40]. Major ion peak of compound 6 under negative mode showed a peak at m/z 325.0143 [M-H]-. This ion was also accompanied by cluster ion at m/z 651.0958 [2M-H]-. The fragment ions m/z 169.0021 [M-H]- and m/z 173.0442 [M-H]- corresponded to the gallic acid moiety and shikimic acid moiety, respectively. ESI-MS data of 7 was similar to 6, the molecular weight was the same. Therefore, 6 and 7 were assumed positioning isomer each other. Based on 1H NMR analysis and comparing it to the previously published literature, the compound 6 and compound 7 were identified as 4-O-galloyl shikimic acid and 5-O-galloyl shikimic acid [41] (Fig 5.6 & 5.7). Compound 8 showed a molecular ion peak at m/z 183.2640 [M-H]-. The molecular formula was deduced as C8H8O5 with the help of 1H NMR analysis and was identified as methyl gallate (Fig 5.8) by comparing with published literature [42]. Compound 9 showed two molecular ion peaks at m/z 634.0134 [M-H]- and 1267.0637 [2M-H]-. The 1H NMR analysis helped us in deducing the formula as C27H22O18 and was identified as corilagin (Fig 5.9) by comparing it with published literature [43]. Compound 10 showed two molecular ion peaks at m/z 634.9866 [M-H]-and 1271.1479 [2M-H]-. After 1H NMR analysis, the molecular formula was deduced as C27H24O18 and was identified as 1, 2, 6, tri-O-galloyl β-D-glucose (Fig 5.10)after comparing it with published literature [43]. Compound 11 showed two molecular ion peaks at m/z 953.5759 [M-H]- and 1907.0813 [2M-H]-. The 1H NMR analysis helped us in deducing the formula as C41H30O27 and was identified as chebulagic acid (Fig 5.11) by comparing it with published literature [42]. Compound 12 showed two molecular ion peaks at m/z 954.9651 [M-H]- and 1911.1218 [2M-H]-. The 1H NMR analysis helped us in deducing the formula as C41H32O27 and was identified as chebulinic acid (Fig 5.12) by comparing it with published literature [42]. Compound 13 showed a molecular ion peak at m/z 300.9498 [M-H]-. The 1H NMR, LC-MS analysis and comparison of Ellagic acid standard on isocratic HPLC helped us identify compound 13 as ellagic acid (Fig 5.13). The NMR spectra and mass spectra of all compounds is shown in S1 Data. The composition, retention time, molecular formulae and the purity of the compounds isolated from HC aqueous extract is shown in Table 2.

Fig 5. Chemical structures of isolated compounds from aqueous extracts of Haritaki churna.

Fig 5

(1: Shikimic acid, 2: Chebulic acid, 3: Gallic acid, 4: 5 hydroxymethyfurfural, 5: Protocatechuic acid, 6: 4-O-galloyl shikimic acid, 7: 5-O-galloyl shikimic acid, 8: Methyl gallate, 9: Corilagin, 10: 1,2,6-Tri-O-galloyl-β-D glucose, 11: Chebulagic acid, 12: Chebulinic acid, 13: Ellagic acid).

Table 2. The phytochemicals isolated from Haritaki churna aqueous extract.

Peak No. Phytochemicals Molecular formula Composition (%) Retention time (min) Molecular weight (Da) Peak purity (%)
1 Shikimic acid C7H10O5 0.351 5.1 174 83.2
2 Chebulic acid C14H12O11 2.168 7.99 336 91.2
3 Gallic acid C7H6O5 19.781 10.37 170 98.9
4 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural C6H6O3 0.921 11.01 126 96.2
5 Protocatechuic acid C7H6O4 2.839 11.89 154 98.5
6 4-O-galloyl shikimic acid C14H14O9 3.247 13.12 326 98.2
7 5-O-galloyl shikimic acid C14H14O9 3.247 13.12 326 97.1
8 Methyl gallate C8H8O5 5.202 13.8 184 94.5
9 Corilagin C27H22O18 15.919 14.08 634 92.2
10 1,2,6 Tri-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose C27H24O18 6.861 14.35 636 82.1
11 Chebulagic acid C41H30O27 11.838 15.05 954 97.5
12 Chebulinic acid C41H32O27 7.889 15.05 956 92.6
13 Ellagic acid C14H6O8 12.662 15.5 302 98.2
14 Rest of the compounds --------- 7.08 --------- --------- ---------

3.7 Haritaki churna is stable in physiological gastric condition

The stability of bioactive natural compounds in biological fluid is very crucial for their activity and delivery to the action site. Haritaki Churna is the primarily an ayurvedic formulation to treat diseases of GI track. The use of dissolution media such as SGF has helped researchers in the approval of effective and stable generic drugs which has been well documented [44]. The Haritaki churna was incubated in water and stimulated gastric fluid (SGF) and then we assess the stability of bioactive compounds and their anti-cancer activity. The HPLC chromatograms show that all major peaks were present in both chromatograms no considerable changes in the overall composition of the formulation even after 6 hours of incubation (Fig 6A–6D). In addition, we extracted the Haritaki churna in SGF to see if differential extraction could result in different proportions of compounds being extracted or whether it alters the yield of extraction. The yield was anyhow similar when extracted in water or SGF. The yield in water was 539.6 ± 14.5 mg whereas it was 541.2 ± 17.3 mg as per the extraction procedure mention in section 2.2 & 2.6. However, SGF extract chromatogram shows a decrease in the intensity of compounds 11, 12 & 13 and increase in the intensities of compounds 5, 9 & 10 but there is no change in composition of overall compounds present in both extracts (Fig 6E & 6F). The IC50s of HCAE incubated in SGF with different time intervals are fundamentally close to the original HCAE IC50 value (Fig 6G). Further, dissolution media such as FaSSIF and FeSSIF, containing bile salts, pancreatin at relevant pH conditions have been recognised and utilised to mimic the conditions in the stomach before and after meals [25]. In contrast to HCAE as the control, there were no significant differences in the chromatograms of the formulation incubated with FaSSIF and FeSSIF, indicating that HC was stable in both the fasting and fed phases (Fig 7A–7C). Additionally, the stability of the compounds present in HCAE was tested by incubating it in FaSSIF and FeSSIF at different time intervals. An increase in the intensity of compound 13 (ellagic acid) and a decrease in the intensity of the compounds 11 & 12 (Chebulagic acid and chebulinic acid) were observed indicating a degradation of those compounds in a time dependent manner (Fig 7D & 7E). It is well established that bulky polyphenols are known to be unstable at pH in the range of 5–7 [45]. The IC50 values of HCAE incubated in FaSSIF and FeSSIF at various time intervals decreased (indicating an increase in anti-cancer activity) because a rise in compound 13’s intensity (ellagic acid) was seen in HCAE with their incubations at different time intervals (Fig 7F & 7G). Given its stability in SGF at low pH circumstances and an increase in anti-cancer activity of HCAE in simulated fasting and fed state intestinal settings, it is reasonable to assume that Haritaki churna formulation can be employed as an anti-cancer drug due to its high bioavailability.

Fig 6. Haritaki churna is stable under simulated gastric environment conditions.

Fig 6

100 mg of lyophilised HCAE was dissolved in 1 ml of SGF and incubated for different time intervals at 37°C. (A) Gradient HPLC chromatogram of HCAE incubated in SGF for 0 Hours. (B) Gradient HPLC chromatogram of HCAE incubated in SGF for 2 Hours. (C) Gradient HPLC chromatogram of HCAE incubated in SGF for 4 Hours. (D) Gradient HPLC chromatogram of HCAE incubated in SGF for 6 Hours. The Haritaki churna extracted in water and SGF were prepared as mentioned before. (E) Gradient HPLC chromatogram of HC extracted in water. (F) Gradient HPLC chromatogram of HC extracted in SGF. (G) HCAE extract retains the biological activity in SGF. DLD1 cells were treated with different concentration of HCAE and cellular viability was measured. MTT cell viability results seem to be coherent with the chromatogram data. The IC50s of HCAE incubated with 0 Hour, 2 Hour, 4 Hour, and 6 Hour are 67.08± 5.2 μg/ml, 63.9 ± 6.3 μg/ml, 65.76 ± 4.66 μg/ml, and 63.4 ± 5.1 μg/ml respectively.

Fig 7. Haritaki churna is stable under simulated intestinal environment conditions: 100mg of Haritaki churna was dissolved in water, FaSSIF and FeSSIF at 37°C.

Fig 7

(A) Gradient HPLC chromatogram of HC incubated in water. (B) Gradient HPLC chromatogram of HC incubated in FaSSIF. (C) Gradient HPLC chromatogram of HC incubated in FeSSIF. (D) Gradient HPLC chromatogram of HCAE incubated in FaSSIF for 0, 2, 4 & 6 Hours. (E) Gradient HPLC chromatogram of HCAE incubated in FeSSIF for 0, 2, 4 & 6 Hours. (F) DLD1 cells were at different concentrations with HCAE incubated in FaSSIF at different time intervals. The IC50 values of HCAE incubated with FaSSIF for 0 Hour, 2 Hour, 4 Hour, and 6 Hour are 77.04 ± 6.4 μg/ml, 72.1 ± 5.4 μg/ml, 66.6 ± 3.7 μg/ml, and 59.6 ± 6.6 μg/ml respectively. (G) DLD1 cells were at different concentrations with HCAE incubated in FeSSIF at different time intervals. The IC50 values of HCAE incubated with FeSSIF for 0 Hour, 2 Hour, 4 Hour, and 6 Hour are 70.8 ± 4.5 μg/ml, 74.1 ± 4.5 μg/ml, 66.4 ± 6.01 μg/ml, and 57.1 ± 3.7 μg/ml respectively.

3.8 Haritaki churna aqueous extract has bioactive compounds with anti-cancer activity

Haritaki churna crude extract has several bioactive compounds and now we have tested individual isolated to explore the role of these compounds in observed anti-cancer activity in crude extract (Fig 1). The HC aqueous extract was fractionated into five major fractions from reverse phase open column chromatography (Table 3). The cancer cells (HCT-116, DLD1, and HT-29) were treated with different number of fractions 1–5 and cellular viability was measured by MTT assay as described in “material and methods”. There were 13 major compounds identified from the five different fractions. Shikimic acid and Chebulic acid identified from fraction 1 didn’t affect the cellular viability of cancer cells. Gallic acid was the primary compound present in fraction 2. Gallic acid extracted from fraction 2 showed anti-cancer activity with an IC50 values in the range of 17–37 μg/ml against different cancer cell lines. Collective evidence has shown that Gallic acid is shown to have anti-cancer activities against a variety of cancer cell lines and our experimental results match with those of previously published results [4650]. The five major compounds present in fraction 3 are 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural, proto-catechuic acid, Methyl-gallate, Corilagin, and 1, 2, 6 Tri-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose. 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and proto-catechuic acid didn’t affect the cellular viability of cancer cells. Methyl-gallate which is similar in structure to gallic acid showed the anti-cancer activity with IC50 in the range of 37–52 μg/ml against different cancer cell lines. Methyl-gallate is a relatively new compound compared with that of gallic acid, but there is still mounting evidence that suggests it exerts anti-cancer activity against a variety of cancer cell lines [5155]. Apart from Gallic acid and Methyl-gallate, Corilagin also exhibited killing of cancer cells with an IC50 in the range of 23–157μg/ml against different cancer cell lines. Corilagin has been tested against ovarian, nasopharyngeal, osteosarcoma, colon, hepatocellular, lung adenocarcinoma, etc. which have shown IC50 in the range of 0.25–19 μg/ml [5660]. 1, 2, 6 Tri-O-galloyl-β-D-glucose which is structurally similar to Corilagin also showed loss of cellular viability in cancer cells but at a higher IC50 in the range of 100–175 μg/ml. Chebulagic acid and chebulinic acid were the two compounds isolated from fraction 4. Chebulagic acid didn’t affect the cellular viability of cancer cells whereas chebulinic acid was effective against all cancer cell lines having an IC50 concentration in the range of 22–122 μg/ml against different cancer cells. Recent studies done on chebulinic acid extracted from Terminalia chebula Retz. showed that chebulinic acid exerts anti-cancer activity against HR8348, LoVo & LS174T (colorectal cancer cell lines) having IC50 in the range of 38–40 mg/L and 53.2±0.16 μM for HOS-1 cells [61]. Fraction 5 contained Chebulinic acid and Ellagic acid which showed IC50 concentration in the range of 10–20μg/ml. Ellagic acid isolated from fraction 5 also showed IC50 in the range of 10–20 μg/ml. The experimental IC50 values of ellagic acid are in coherence with published literature [62, 63]. The IC50 values for different fractions and isolated compounds have been listed in the Table 3 and dose-dependent response graphs used to calculate the anti-cancer IC50 are given in the S3 Data. Gallic acid, methyl gallate and ellagic acid were found to be the most active polyphenols from HCAE based on their anti-cancer activity. The individual compositional make-up of gallic acid, methyl gallate, and ellagic acid were measured using their standard curves and determined to be 227.1 ± 24.3 μg, 124.1 ± 9.4 μg, and 67 ± 6.3 μg respectively per 1mg of HCAE (S2 Data).

Table 3. Anti-cancer activity of different fractions and pure phytochemicals against colon cancer.

S No Fraction/ Compound name HCT-116 IC50(μg/ml) DLD1 IC50(μg/ml) HT-29 IC50(μg/ml)
1 HCAE 92.69 ± 7.07 70.41 ± 6.35 379.93 ± 5.29
2 HC-0 Fraction > 500 > 500 > 500
3 HC-20 Fraction 33.71 ± 4.24 15.61 ± 4.89 43.57 ± 4.98
4 HC-50 Fraction 155.5 ± 7.59 79.39 ± 4.83 141.43 ± 4.66
5 HC-80 Fraction 71.29 ± 5.4 36.53 ± 3.77 115.7 ± 4.8
6 HC-100 Fraction 14.03 ± 3.46 20.14 ± 3.99 13.32 ± 3.48
7 Shikimic acid > 500 > 500 > 500
8 Chebulic acid > 300 > 300 > 300
9 Gallic acid 37.1 ± 4.56 18.1 ± 4.63 35.06 ± 5.31
10 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural > 500 > 500 > 500
11 Protocatechuic acid > 300 > 300 > 300
12 4-O-galloyl shikimic acid 311.2 ± 6.2 179.6 ± 4.6 161 ± 4.79
13 5-O-galloyl shikimic acid 281.5 ± 5.2 136.8 ± 4.8 203.7 ± 5.8
14 Methyl gallate 38.68 ± 4.51 37.8 ± 3.39 30.71 ± 3.76
15 Corilagin 23.91 ± 3.82 63.08 ± 4.21 157.39 ± 4.34
16 1,2,6 Tri-O-galloyl β-D glucose 100.11 ± 5.29 157.5 ± 7.64 114.22 ± 4.49
17 Chebulagic acid > 250 > 250 > 400
18 Chebulinic acid 54.04 ± 5.41 22.63 ± 4.21 122.4 ± 4.02
19 Ellagic acid 10.08± 3.46 17.39± 4.89 13.1± 4.81

Foot note: Shikimic acid, chebulic acid, gallic acid, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, protocatechuic acid, 4-O-galloyl shikimic acid, 5-O-galloyl shikimic acid, methyl gallate, 1, 2, 6, Tri-O-galloyl β-D-glucose, and corilagin, were dissolved in water whereas chebulagic acid, chebulinic acid, and Ellagic acid were dissolved in DMSO.

3.9 Ellagic acid is the most active ingredient from HCAE

Dietary polyphenols are known to exert their anti-cancer activity by interfering with membrane receptors, disrupting cellular signaling cascades, enzymes in basic metabolic processes, and other targets which basically holds up the cellular machinery [64]. Many crude extracts and their active ingredient have been shown to have anti-cancer action in synergistic and individualistic manner [65]. Often, it is the presence of a particular compound that is responsible for the activity of the crude extract. Thus, a deductive approach was employed to elucidate the polyphenols from HCAE which when removed will have a greater impact on the overall anti-cancer activity of the crude water extract (Fig 8A). Using the compositional make-up of 13 phytochemicals obtained from gradient HPLC chromatogram, different mixtures of the phytochemicals were made. The Complete Mixture (CM: mixture of all 13 identified compounds) did not show much variation in its anti-cancer activity (80.4 ± 5.5 μg/ml) when compared to its crude counterpart HCAE (70.41 ± 6.35 μg/ml). Further, the cellular viabilities (IC50 values) of different mixtures (C1′-C13′) against the colon cancer cell line DLD1 revealed that subtraction of some polyphenols from the CM were more significant than others in terms of their anti-cancer activity. For instance, subtractions of individual polyphenols from the complete mixture such as C1′, C5′-C8′, C10′-C12′ observed a decrease in IC50 values in the range of 0.99% to 19% that correlates to the gain of anti-cancer activity of HCAE (Fig 8B). This increase in anti-cancer activity may be attributed to their antagonistic action. Their antagonistic action may be (a) because of these phytochemicals competing for the same protein which is crucial in pathway of killing cancer cells or (b) may be because of formation of a complex polyphenol mixture which are unable to perform their individual activities [66, 67]. On the other hand, C3′, C9′ and C13′ which corresponds to subtraction of gallic acid, corilagin and ellagic acid respectively, observed an increase in the IC50 values that signifies the loss of anti-cancer activity of HCAE. In C3′, C9′ and C13′, an increase in IC50 values by 24.2%, 12.7% and 36.3% was observed, thus making ellagic acid as the most crucial polyphenol in the phytochemical makeup of the crude HCAE extract. Cancer cells when treated with ellagic acid exhibited loss of cellular viability and distortions in cellular morphology. Ellagic acid was found to exert anti-cancer activity in a dose dependent manner on colorectal cancer cell lines HCT-116, DLD1 & HT-29 with IC50s of 10.08 ± 3.46 μg/ml, 17.39 ± 4.89 μg/ml, 13.1 ± 4.81 μg/ml respectively (Fig 8C & 8D). Ellagic acid is a well-known polyphenol which is known for its various activities that include antioxidant, neuroprotective, hepatoprotective etc., along with anti-cancer potential [63, 68].

Fig 8. Ellagic acid is the active ingredient responsible for anti-cancer activity of HCAE.

Fig 8

(A) Schematic of the deductive approach to discover the most active ingredient in HCAE. (B) The variation in anti-cancer activity after removal of compounds from HCAE. The term "CM" stands for the complete mixture, which is made up of 13 identified compounds and is created in accordance with the composition of the gradient HPLC chromatogram. (C) Colon Cancer cells (DLD1) were treated with different concentration of ellagic acid (0–50 μg/ml) and the cell viability was measured by MTT assay. The MTT curve of ellagic acid is presented with an IC50 of 17.39± 4.89 μg/ml after treatment of 48 hours. (D) DLD1 cells were examined under a microscope, and pictures were captured from various fields using the Cytell cell imaging system (GE Healthcare). Representative images are shown. (Note: C1′-Mixture except shikimic acid, C2′-Mixture except chebulic acid, C3′-Mixture-except gallic acid, C4′-Mixture except 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, C5′-Mixture except protocatechuic acid, C6′-Mixture-except 4-O-galloyl shikimic acid, C7′-Mixture except 5-O-galloyl shikimic acid, C8′-Mixture except methyl gallate, C9′-Mixture-except corilagin, C10′-Mixture except 1,2,6-Tri-O-galloyl-β-D glucose, C11′-Mixture except chebulagic acid, C12′-Mixture-except chebulinic acid, C13′-Mixture except ellagic acid).

3.10 Ellagic acid perturbs the cell cycle in cancer cells

Cancer cells treated with ellagic acid is exhibiting cellular stress with the appearance of distortion of cellular morphology. The stress linked signalling is associated with conservation of energy production and adaptation of cell with pro-survival strategies [69]. It in-turn disturbs many basic cellular functions including cell-cycle through reduction in production of various regulatory cyclins. It is well known that a mammalian cell undergoes various stages of cell growth and division [70]. The four phases present during cellular division are G1, S, G2, and M phases. The effect of ellagic acid on cell cycle progression in different colon cancer cell lines was assessed by flow cytometry analysis after staining the cells with propidium iodide (Fig 9A). The 2-D chromatogram was analysed using FCS Express software. Before treatment, the population of cells in S-phase were 17 ± 3.2%, 18.4 ± 4.1%, and 15.1 ± 6.9% for HCT-116, DLD1, and HT-29 cells respectively. Upon treatment with ellagic acid for 24h, the cell population in S-phase were 40.9 ± 6.1%, 30.8 ± 5.2%, and 31.9 ± 4.9%. The flow cytometry analysis suggests that there is an increase in the population of S-phase cells and cancer cells does not cross S-phase. Further, the protein expression levels of cyclin A2 and cyclin D1 were found to be down-regulated upon treatment with ellagic acid. Although cyclin A2 levels decreased after 24 hours of treatment, there were no significant changes in cyclin D1 expression levels, indicating that cells were arrested primarily in S-phase after 24 hours of treatment. However, after 48 hours of ellagic acid treatment, both cyclins (A2 and D1) were shown to have reduced expression levels in a dose dependent manner.

Fig 9. Ellagic acid causes cell death in cancer cells by apoptosis.

Fig 9

(A) Ellagic acid causes perturbations in cell cycle progression in cancer cells. Ellagic acid treated colon cancer cell lines at their respective IC50 concentrations for 24 hours were stained with propidium iodide and was subjected to analysis in FL-2A channel in BD FACS calibre. Ellagic acid caused degradation of genomic DNA. HCT-116 (B), DLD1 (C), and HT29 (D) cells were treated with ellagic acid shows the fragmentation of genomic DNA in the treated cells whereas the genomic DNA is intact in untreated cells. (E) Ellagic acid induces apoptosis in cancer cells. Flow cytometry analysis was performed on dual stained HCT-116, DLD-1 and HT-29 cells by BD FACS Caliber upon treatment with Haritaki churna aqueous extract for 48 hours with their respective IC50 concentrations (10.08 μg/ml, 17.39 μg/ml and 13.1 μg/ml respectively). (F) Representative Images of Untreated and treated cancer cells from panel E. (G) Ellagic acid induced death of colorectal cancer cells (DLD1) was caused by intrinsic pathway of apoptosis. DLD1 cells were treated with various concentrations (2.5, 5, 10, 15, 20 μg/ml) of ellagic acids for 24 and 48 hours of treatment. Western blotting was performed after harvesting the proteins using RIPA lysis buffer. Western blot images of several proteins related to apoptosis, necroptosis, cell cycle regulation are shown. (H) Relative expression levels of proteins related to apoptosis, necroptosis, and cell cycle regulation.

3.11 Ellagic acid induces mitochondrial apoptotic pathway in cancer cells

The colorectal cancer cells in stress due to treatment with ellagic acid can induce cell death either by undergoing apoptosis, necrosis, autophagy or necroptosis. As caspase dependent apoptosis is the most common form of programmed cell death (PCD), we first checked DNA fragmentation/laddering which is a hallmark of apoptosis. Treatment of cells with ellagic acid resulted in DNA fragments that was detected by DNA laddering assay (Fig 9B–9D). It was further confirmed by dual staining of treated cells by acridine orange and propidium iodide is done to differentiate the live healthy cells from the apoptotic cells. Untreated cells were shown to have prominently healthy cells ranging from 94–99% in different cell lines (Fig 9E). The cells treated with ellagic acid were shown to have changed in the distribution of cells. The early apoptotic was seen in a range of 5–12% compared to 0–1% in the untreated cells. There was also an increase in the late apoptotic cells which were seen in a range of 24–32% compared to 0–1% in the untreated cells. The FACS analysis was also confirmed by fluorescence imaging of the dually stained cells (Fig 9F). Further, immunoblotting of caspase 3 and its cleaved form obtained from DLD1 cells treated ellagic acid at 24h and 48 h revealed increased expression of cleaved caspase 3 (17–19 kDa) in a dose dependent manner (Fig 9G & 9H). Caspase 3 can be cleaved by two main pathways, the mitochondrial pathway via release of cytochrome-c or death receptor pathway via caspase 8 activation [71]. An increase in cytochrome-c expression was seen after 24 and 48 hours of ellagic acid treatment, indicating that the killing is caused via the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway. The formation of cleaved caspase 3 resulted in the cleavage of PARP-1 (poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1) to form cleaved PARP-1, an 89 kDa cleaved fragment indicating onset of apoptosis upon treatment with ellagic acid. The cells undergoing DNA damage/fragmentation or induction of ROS can lead to an over expression of pro-apoptotic proteins and simultaneously decrease anti-apoptotic proteins such as Bcl2 [72]. Hence, treatment with ellagic acid also down-regulated Bcl2. Additionally, the bioactive polyphenol was shown to downregulate caspase 8 and cleaved caspase 8 upon treatment, ruling out the possibility of killing cancer cells via classical death receptor pathway including TNFR1, TNFR2, and Fas receptors. Necroptosis is a type of controlled cell death caused by the activation of death receptors and the downregulation of caspase 8 [73]. The hallmark proteins of necroptosis, RIP (Receptor interacting protein kinase) and MLKL (Mixed lineage kinase domain-like), as well as their phosphorylated versions, p-RIP and p-MLKL, were shown to be down-regulated by ellagic acid treatment demonstrating no evidence of necroptosis (Fig 9G & 9H) (S1 Raw images).

The current study is aimed at exploring the anti-cancer properties and the bio-active molecules responsible from Haritaki churna. Ayurvedic formulations are of different types [1]. Based on the number of herbs used it can be either a single herb formulation or polyherbal formulation. Apart from this, they are also characterized based on their method of preparation such as ark, avaleh, churna, etc [74]. The search for new compounds from natural resources has gained popularity in the past. The discovery of drugs such as taxol, vincristine, etc., has motivated researchers to look for new drugs that are effective, economic, and have fewer side effects. The eminence of natural compounds depends on the careful selection of plants, their taxonomical data, and even information from ancient medicine [75]. There are a lot of plants available in ayurvedic medicine which is used in preparing different types of formulations. One of the most famous is Haritaki which is used in many formulations. Haritaki churna (prepared from plants of Terminalia chebula Retz.) is mainly used for treating gastro-intestinal disorders such as constipation, gastric ulcers, etc. Haritaki is used in manufacturing a single herb formulation consisting only of its principal plant or is also used to prepare polyherbal formulation such as Arkeshwara ras, Panchakola, Sapthaparna Rasagenthi Leyham Triphala [1012, 19, 7680]. There have been no studies reported on the anti-cancer activity of Haritaki (Terminalia chebula Retz.) as an ayurvedic formulation. However, there are many studies in which the researchers have shown the anti-cancer activity on the extracts of Terminalia chebula fruit. The study done by Saleem et al used the 70% methanolic extracts of Terminalia chebula Retz. and attributed the anti-cancer activity of their extract to the presence of chebulinic acid, tannic acid, and ellagic acid [61]. This complies with our results as we have shown that gallic acid, ellagic acid, and chebulinic acid to be among the major polyphenols present in our ayurvedic formulation. Similar types of studies were reported on the alcoholic extracts of Terminalia chebula. All three studies attributed their anti-cancer activity on different types of cancer cell lines to the presence of polyphenols in their extracts [49, 81, 82]. Haritaki churna aqueous extract (HCAE) has anti-cancer properties where it is shown that HCAE helps in reducing cellular viability in a dose-dependent manner.

The polyphenols are known to have anti-oxidant properties and can exert chemo preventive effects towards different cancers. It does so by almost involving the whole spectrum of cell machinery such as inhibiting DNA synthesis, production of ROS, modulating cell survival pathways, cell cycle arrest, interference with membrane receptors, interaction with enzymes involved in metastasis & tumour promotion, etc. [83, 84]. The anti-cancer activity of HCAE investigated in this study in essence is due to polyphenols, with ellagic acid being the most potent one. The cell viability assays conducted on colorectal cancer cells suggests that ellagic acid unequivocally decreases their growth at lower concentrations and kills them at higher concentrations. These promising results are in agreement with the previously published results in which ellagic acid is shown to have effect on numerous cancer cells [62, 63, 8587]. Further, ellagic acid was observed to have induced fragmentation of DNA which is a hallmark of apoptosis. Release of cytochrome-c from mitochondria, increased expression of cleaved caspase 3 and reduced expressions of caspase 8 and Bcl2 were observed indicating ellagic acid induced mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis. Consistent with our study, various apoptosis related events such as down regulation of Bcl-XL, cytochrome-c release from mitochondria, activation of caspase-9 and increase in expression of cleaved caspase-3 have occurred in Caco2 cells upon treatment with ellagic acid [88]. Several other colorectal cancer cells such as HCT-15, HCT-116, SW480, LoVo, HT-29 have observed similar fate when treated with ellagic acid [63, 85, 89]. Ellagic acid induced apoptosis is also linked with decreased levels of matrix metalloproteases (MMP2, MMP9) indicating suppression of metastatic potential of cancer cells. Accumulated evidence suggest that changes in cell cycle machinery can either induce or prevent apoptosis [90]. Cyclin D1 controls cancer cells’ ability to adhere, invade, and metastasize in addition to its role in controlling the cell cycle [91]. Cyclin D1 overexpression and aberrations in wnt/β-catenin pathway is strongly linked to colorectal malignancies [92], and targeting this route with ellagic acid might be beneficial in the treatment of CRCs. Ellagic acid in this study was found to arrest cells specifically in S-phase in different colorectal cancer cell lines which correlated with reduced expression levels of cyclin A2 and cyclin D1. Our findings are in coherence with already published literature in which ellagic acid is found to promote cell cycle arrest and induce apoptosis by modulating PI3K/Akt pathway in colorectal cancer cells [93]. In a similar manner, ellagic acid was able to halt cell cycle in G0/G1-phase in MCF-7 (breast cancer cells) which was a result of the polyphenol modulating TGF-β/smads pathway [94]. Transcriptional profiling of ellagic acid treated Caco2 cells revealed changes in expression levels of cell cycle genes such as CCNB, CCNB1IP1 when there was arrest in S and G2/M phases of cell cycle [95]. This preliminary study sheds light on the ability of ellagic acid on interrupting basic cell machinery such as cell survival pathways, apoptosis regulation, cell proliferation pathways, etc.

4 Conclusions

Ayurvedic medicine makes use of many herbs and plants. One such plant is Haritaki (Terminalia chebula Retz.) which is considered one of the most important medicinal plants in ayurveda. Our study discovered that Haritaki churna is a potent anti-cancer ayurvedic formulation, and it has been noticed that Haritaki churna has been consistent in displaying anti-cancer action across different cancer cells, and it is stable under simulated gastric and intestinal circumstances. The loss of cellular viability of cancer cells was attributed to the presence of the high amount of polyphenols present in the HCAE. Gallic acid, methyl gallate, corilagin, chebulinic acid, and ellagic acid were the compounds contributing to the anti-cancer activity of HCAE. Using a deductive method, it was discovered that ellagic acid was the most active compound in HCAE. Further, ellagic acid was also shown to induce apoptosis and arrest cell cycle which suggests its involvement in interruption of basic cellular machinery related to DNA synthesis and regulation of apoptosis. The increase in cytochrome-c expression, cleavage of caspase 3, and its target PARP-1 in a dose and time dependent manner shows that ellagic acid triggers cell death via the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis, which is a feature of various chemotherapeutic treatments.

Supporting information

S1 Data. NMR and LC-MS data for compounds isolated from HCAE.

(DOCX)

S2 Data. Purity of compounds isolated from HCAE and quantification of GA, MG and EA in HCAE using standard curves.

(DOCX)

S3 Data. Cell viability assays for fractions and compounds isolated from HCAE against colorectal cancer (DLD1, HCT-116 and HT-29) cell lines.

(DOCX)

S1 Raw images. Raw images of western blots.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the technical support from central instrument facility “(CIF) of IIT Guwahati.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Susruta S. An English translation of the Sushruta samhita, based on original Sanskrit text: Рипол Классик; 1963. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kaur G, Gupta V, Bansal P. Innate antioxidant activity of some traditional formulations. Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research. 2017;8(1):39. doi: 10.4103/2231-4040.197393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wanjari MM, Mishra S, Dey YN, Sharma D, Gaidhani SN, Jadhav AD. Antidiabetic activity of Chandraprabha vati–A classical Ayurvedic formulation. Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicine. 2016;7(3):144–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2016.08.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Balkrishna A, Ranjan R, Sakat SS, Sharma VK, Shukla R, Joshi K, et al. Evaluation of polyherbal ayurvedic formulation ‘Peedantak Vati’for anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties. Journal of ethnopharmacology. 2019;235:361–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2019.01.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Arora P, Ansari S, Anjum V, Mathur R, Ahmad S. Investigation of anti-asthmatic potential of Kanakasava in ovalbumin-induced bronchial asthma and airway inflammation in rats. Journal of ethnopharmacology. 2017;197:242–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2016.07.082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ganesan R, Doss HM, Rasool M. Majoon ushba, a polyherbal compound ameliorates rheumatoid arthritis via regulating inflammatory and bone remodeling markers in rats. Cytokine. 2016;77:115–26. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2015.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Timbadiya MJ, Nishteswar K, Acharya R, Nariya MB. Experimental evaluation of antipyretic and analgesic activities of Amalakyadi Gana: An Ayurvedic formulation. Ayu. 2015;36(2):220. doi: 10.4103/0974-8520.175554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.George SK, Rajesh R, Kumar S, Sulekha B, Balaram P. A polyherbal ayurvedic drug–Indukantha Ghritha as an adjuvant to cancer chemotherapy via immunomodulation. Immunobiology. 2008;213(8):641–9. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2008.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tiwari V, Saba K, Veeraiah P, Jose J, Lakhotia SC, Patel AB. Amalaki Rasayana improved memory and neuronal metabolic activity in AβPP-PS1 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of biosciences. 2017;42(3):363–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nafiujjaman M, Nurunnabi M, Saha SK, Jahan R, Lee Y-k, Rahmatullah M. Anticancer activity of Arkeshwara Rasa-A herbo-metallic preparation. Ayu. 2015;36(3):346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shamsi TN, Parveen R, Fatima S. Panchakola Reduces Oxidative Stress in MCF-7 Breast Cancer and HEK293 Cells. Journal of dietary supplements. 2018;15(5):704–14. doi: 10.1080/19390211.2017.1386255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ranga RS, Girija R, Nur-e-Alam M, Sathishkumar S, Akbarsha MA, Thirugnanam S, et al. Rasagenthi lehyam (RL) a novel complementary and alternative medicine for prostate cancer. Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology. 2004;54(1):7–15. doi: 10.1007/s00280-004-0770-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chinchu J, Mohan MC, Kumar BP. Anti-obesity and lipid lowering effects of Varanadi kashayam (decoction) on high fat diet induced obese rats. Obesity Medicine. 2020;17:100170. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bafna P, Bodhankar S. Gastrointestinal effects of Mebarid®, an ayurvedic formulation, in experimental animals. Journal of ethnopharmacology. 2003;86(2–3):173–6. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(03)00048-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Varma SR, Sivaprakasam TO, Mishra A, Kumar LS, Prakash N, Prabhu S, et al. Protective effects of triphala on dermal fibroblasts and human keratinocytes. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0145921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145921 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Baskaran UL, Martin SJ, Mahaboobkhan R, Prince SE. Protective role of Triphala, an Indian traditional herbal formulation, against the nephrotoxic effects of bromobenzene in Wistar albino rats. Journal of integrative medicine. 2015;13(2):115–21. doi: 10.1016/S2095-4964(15)60165-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sireeratawong S, Jaijoy K, Soonthornchareonnon N. Evaluation of anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive activity of Triphala recipe. African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines. 2013;10(2):246–50. doi: 10.4314/ajtcam.v10i2.8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang W, Liu T, Yang L, Ma Y, Dou F, Shi L, et al. Study on the multi-targets mechanism of triphala on cardio-cerebral vascular diseases based on network pharmacology. Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy. 2019;116:108994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cheriyamundath S, Mahaddalkar T, Save SN, Choudhary S, Hosur RV, Lopus M. Aqueous extract of Triphala inhibits cancer cell proliferation through perturbation of microtubule assembly dynamics. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2018;98:76–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nigam M, Mishra AP, Adhikari‐Devkota A, Dirar AI, Hassan MM, Adhikari A, et al. Fruits of Terminalia chebula Retz.: A review on traditional uses, bioactive chemical constituents and pharmacological activities. Phytotherapy Research. 2020;34(10):2518–33. doi: 10.1002/ptr.6702 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bag A, Bhattacharyya SK, Chattopadhyay RR. The development of Terminalia chebula Retz.(Combretaceae) in clinical research. Asian Pacific journal of tropical biomedicine. 2013;3(3):244–52. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(13)60059-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Deka SJ, Roy A, Ramakrishnan V, Manna D, Trivedi V. Danazol has potential to cause PKC translocation, cell cycle dysregulation, and apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Chemical biology & drug design. 2017;89(6):953–63. doi: 10.1111/cbdd.12921 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Deka SJ, Mamdi N, Manna D, Trivedi V. Alkyl cinnamates induce protein kinase C translocation and anticancer activity against breast cancer cells through induction of the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis. Journal of breast cancer. 2016;19(4):358–71. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2016.19.4.358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Böyum A. Isolation of mononuclear cells and granulocytes from human blood. Isolation of monuclear cells by one centrifugation, and of granulocytes by combining centrifugation and sedimentation at 1 g. Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation Supplementum. 1968;97:77–89. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Klein S. The use of biorelevant dissolution media to forecast the in vivo performance of a drug. The AAPS journal. 2010;12(3):397–406. doi: 10.1208/s12248-010-9203-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Singleton VL, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventós RM.[14] Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent. Methods in enzymology. 299: Elsevier; 1999. p. 152–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhishen J, Mengcheng T, Jianming W. The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food chemistry. 1999;64(4):555–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sreevidya N, Mehrotra S. Spectrophotometric method for estimation of alkaloids precipitable with Dragendorff’s reagent in plant materials. Journal of AOAC international. 2003;86(6):1124–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ernst O, Zor T. Linearization of the Bradford protein assay. JoVE (Journal of Visualized Experiments). 2010;(38):e1918. doi: 10.3791/1918 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Das B, Al-Amin M, Russel S, Kabir S, Bhattacherjee R, Hannan J. Phytochemical screening and evaluation of analgesic activity of Oroxylum indicum. Indian journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2014;76(6):571. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Anazetti MC, Melo PS, Durán N, Haun M. Comparative cytotoxicity of dimethylamide-crotonin in the promyelocytic leukemia cell line (HL60) and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Toxicology. 2003;188(2–3):261–74. doi: 10.1016/s0300-483x(03)00089-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liu C-P, Tsai W-J, Lin Y-L, Liao J-F, Chen C-F, Kuo Y-C. The extracts from Nelumbo nucifera suppress cell cycle progression, cytokine genes expression, and cell proliferation in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Life sciences. 2004;75(6):699–716. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2004.01.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.de Lima RMT, Dos Reis AC, de Oliveira Santos JV, de Oliveira Ferreira JR, de Oliveira Filho JWG, Dias ACS, et al. Antitumoral effects of [6]-gingerol [(S)-5-hydroxy-1-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-3-decanone] in sarcoma 180 cells through cytogenetic mechanisms. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2020;126:110004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Verhoeckx K, Cotter P, López-Expósito I, Kleiveland C, Lea T, Mackie A, et al. The impact of food bioactives on health: in vitro and ex vivo models. 2015. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Suganthy N, Muniasamy S, Archunan G. Safety assessment of methanolic extract of Terminalia chebula fruit, Terminalia arjuna bark and its bioactive constituent 7-methyl gallic acid: In vitro and in vivo studies. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2018;92:347–57. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.12.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Usuki T, Yasuda N, Yoshizawa-Fujita M, Rikukawa M. Extraction and isolation of shikimic acid from Ginkgo biloba leaves utilizing an ionic liquid that dissolves cellulose. Chemical Communications. 2011;47(38):10560–2. doi: 10.1039/c1cc13306c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lee H-S, Jung S-H, Yun B-S, Lee K-W. Isolation of chebulic acid from Terminalia chebula Retz. and its antioxidant effect in isolated rat hepatocytes. Archives of Toxicology. 2007;81(3):211–8. doi: 10.1007/s00204-006-0139-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dao NT, Jang Y, Kim M, Nguyen HH, Pham DQ, Le Dang Q, et al. Chemical Constituents and Anti-influenza Viral Activity of the Leaves of Vietnamese Plant Elaeocarpus tonkinensis. Records of Natural Products. 2019;13(1). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Luo W, Zhao M, Yang B, Shen G, Rao G. Identification of bioactive compounds in Phyllenthus emblica L. fruit and their free radical scavenging activities. Food Chemistry. 2009;114(2):499–504. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.López-Martínez LM, Santacruz-Ortega H, Navarro R-E, Sotelo-Mundo RR, González-Aguilar GA. A 1H NMR investigation of the interaction between phenolic acids found in Mango (Manguifera indica cv Ataulfo) and Papaya (Carica papaya cv Maradol) and 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) Free Radicals. PloS one. 2015;10(11):e0140242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ishimaru K, Nonaka G-I, Nishioka I. Gallic acid esters of proto-quercitol, quinic acid and (−)-shikimic acid from quercus mongolica and q. myrsin aefolia. Phytochemistry. 1987;26(5):1501–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Anil M, Nandini P. Simultaneous isolation and identification of phytoconstituents from Terminalia chebula by preparative chromatography. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research. 2010;2(5):97–103. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yakubu OF, Adebayo AH, Dokunmu TM, Zhang Y-J, Iweala EE. Cytotoxic effects of compounds isolated from Ricinodendron heudelotii. Molecules. 2019;24(1):145. doi: 10.3390/molecules24010145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Anand O, Lawrence XY, Conner DP, Davit BM. Dissolution testing for generic drugs: an FDA perspective. The AAPS journal. 2011;13(3):328–35. doi: 10.1208/s12248-011-9272-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Honda S, Ishida R, Hidaka K, Masuda T. Stability of polyphenols under alkaline conditions and the formation of a xanthine oxidase inhibitor from gallic acid in a solution at pH 7.4. Food Science and Technology Research. 2019;25(1):123–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.You BR, Moon HJ, Han YH, Park WH. Gallic acid inhibits the growth of HeLa cervical cancer cells via apoptosis and/or necrosis. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2010;48(5):1334–40. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.02.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bernhaus A, Fritzer-Szekeres M, Grusch M, Saiko P, Krupitza G, Venkateswarlu S, et al. Digalloylresveratrol, a new phenolic acid derivative induces apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in human HT-29 colon cancer cells. Cancer letters. 2009;274(2):299–304. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.09.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Liang C-z, Zhang X, Li H, Tao Y-q, Tao L-j, Yang Z-r, et al. Gallic acid induces the apoptosis of human osteosarcoma cells in vitro and in vivo via the regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways. Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals. 2012;27(10):701–10. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2012.1245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Shankara BR, Ramachandra Y, Rajan SS, Ganapathy PS, Yarla NS, Richard S, et al. Evaluating the anticancer potential of ethanolic gall extract of Terminalia chebula (Gaertn.) Retz.(combretaceae). Pharmacognosy research. 2016;8(3):209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lee H-L, Lin C-S, Kao S-H, Chou M-C. Gallic acid induces G1 phase arrest and apoptosis of triple-negative breast cancer cell MDA-MB-231 via p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase/p21/p27 axis. Anti-cancer drugs. 2017;28(10):1150–6. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000565 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Chaudhuri D, Ghate NB, Singh SS, Mandal N. Methyl gallate isolated from Spondias pinnata exhibits anticancer activity against human glioblastoma by induction of apoptosis and sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 activation. Pharmacognosy Magazine. 2015;11(42):269. doi: 10.4103/0973-1296.153078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ahmad S, Sukari MA, Ismail N, Ismail IS, Abdul AB, Bakar MFA, et al. Phytochemicals from Mangifera pajang Kosterm and their biological activities. BMC complementary and alternative medicine. 2015;15(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12906-015-0594-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Huang C-Y, Chang Y-J, Wei P-L, Hung C-S, Wang W. Methyl gallate, gallic acid-derived compound, inhibit cell proliferation through increasing ROS production and apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Plos one. 2021;16(3):e0248521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kamatham S, Kumar N, Gudipalli P. Isolation and characterization of gallic acid and methyl gallate from the seed coats of Givotia rottleriformis Griff. and their anti-proliferative effect on human epidermoid carcinoma A431 cells. Toxicology reports. 2015;2:520–9. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2015.03.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Afsar T, Trembley JH, Salomon CE, Razak S, Khan MR, Ahmed K. Growth inhibition and apoptosis in cancer cells induced by polyphenolic compounds of Acacia hydaspica: Involvement of multiple signal transduction pathways. Scientific reports. 2016;6(1):1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Jia L, Jin H, Zhou J, Chen L, Lu Y, Ming Y, et al. A potential anti-tumor herbal medicine, Corilagin, inhibits ovarian cancer cell growth through blocking the TGF-β signaling pathways. BMC complementary and alternative medicine. 2013;13(1):1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Li X, Deng Y, Zheng Z, Huang W, Chen L, Tong Q, et al. Corilagin, a promising medicinal herbal agent. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2018;99:43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.01.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Deng Y, Li X, Li X, Zheng Z, Huang W, Chen L, et al. Corilagin induces the apoptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma cells through the mitochondrial apoptotic and death receptor pathways. Oncology reports. 2018;39(6):2545–52. doi: 10.3892/or.2018.6396 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zhang Y-J, Nagao T, Tanaka T, Yang C-R, Okabe H, Kouno I. Antiproliferative activity of the main constituents from Phyllanthus emblica. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 2004;27(2):251–5. doi: 10.1248/bpb.27.251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Liu Z, WANG D-c, CHEN Y-w, Ren L, Li K, Zhang W. Experiment studies on the pharmacodynamics experiment by corilagin. Cancer Research On Prevention and Treatment. 2002:05. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Saleem A, Husheem M, Härkönen P, Pihlaja K. Inhibition of cancer cell growth by crude extract and the phenolics of Terminalia chebula retz. fruit. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2002;81(3):327–36. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(02)00099-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zhao J, Li G, Bo W, Zhou Y, Dang S, Wei J, et al. Multiple effects of ellagic acid on human colorectal carcinoma cells identified by gene expression profile analysis. International journal of oncology. 2017;50(2):613–21. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2017.3843 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ceci C, Lacal PM, Tentori L, De Martino MG, Miano R, Graziani G. Experimental evidence of the antitumor, antimetastatic and antiangiogenic activity of ellagic acid. Nutrients. 2018;10(11):1756. doi: 10.3390/nu10111756 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Han X, Shen T, Lou H. Dietary polyphenols and their biological significance. International journal of molecular sciences. 2007;8(9):950–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Greenwell M, Rahman P. Medicinal plants: their use in anticancer treatment. International journal of pharmaceutical sciences and research. 2015;6(10):4103. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.6(10).4103-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Yin N, Ma W, Pei J, Ouyang Q, Tang C, Lai L. Synergistic and antagonistic drug combinations depend on network topology. PloS one. 2014;9(4):e93960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093960 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Budman DR, Calabro A, Kreis W. Synergistic and antagonistic combinations of drugs in human prostate cancer cell lines in vitro. Anti-cancer drugs. 2002;13(10):1011–6. doi: 10.1097/00001813-200211000-00005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Sharifi-Rad J, Quispe C, Castillo CMS, Caroca R, Lazo-Vélez MA, Antonyak H, et al. Ellagic Acid: A Review on Its Natural Sources, Chemical Stability, and Therapeutic Potential. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2022;2022. doi: 10.1155/2022/3848084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 69.Fulda S, Gorman AM, Hori O, Samali A. Cellular stress responses: cell survival and cell death. International journal of cell biology. 2010;2010. doi: 10.1155/2010/214074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Vermeulen K, Van Bockstaele DR, Berneman ZN. The cell cycle: a review of regulation, deregulation and therapeutic targets in cancer. Cell proliferation. 2003;36(3):131–49. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2184.2003.00266.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Lossi L. The concept of intrinsic versus extrinsic apoptosis. Biochemical Journal. 2022;479(3):357–84. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20210854 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Dhanasekaran DN, Reddy EP. JNK signaling in apoptosis. Oncogene. 2008;27(48):6245–51. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Karlowitz R, van Wijk SJ. Surviving death: emerging concepts of RIPK3 and MLKL ubiquitination in the regulation of necroptosis. The FEBS Journal. 2023;290(1):37–54. doi: 10.1111/febs.16255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Joshi VK, Joshi A, Dhiman KS. The Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India, development and perspectives. Journal of ethnopharmacology. 2017;197:32–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2016.07.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Hostettmann K, Terreaux C. Search for new lead compounds from higher plants. CHIMIA International Journal for Chemistry. 2000;54(11):652–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Sandhya T, Lathika K, Pandey B, Mishra K. Potential of traditional ayurvedic formulation, Triphala, as a novel anticancer drug. Cancer letters. 2006;231(2):206–14. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.01.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Kaur S, Michael H, Arora S, Härkönen PL, Kumar S. The in vitro cytotoxic and apoptotic activity of Triphala—an Indian herbal drug. Journal of ethnopharmacology. 2005;97(1):15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2004.09.050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Jagetia GC, Baliga MS. Evaluation of anticancer activity of the alkaloid fraction of Alstonia scholaris (Sapthaparna) in vitro and in vivo. Phytotherapy Research: An International Journal Devoted to Pharmacological and Toxicological Evaluation of Natural Product Derivatives. 2006;20(2):103–9. doi: 10.1002/ptr.1810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Sandhya T, Mishra K. Cytotoxic response of breast cancer cell lines, MCF 7 and T 47 D to triphala and its modification by antioxidants. Cancer letters. 2006;238(2):304–13. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Shi Y, Sahu RP, Srivastava SK. Triphala inhibits both in vitro and in vivo xenograft growth of pancreatic tumor cells by inducing apoptosis. BMC cancer. 2008;8(1):1–16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Lee S-H, Ryu SY, Choi SU, Lee CO, No Z, Kim S-K, et al. Hydrolysable tannins and related compound having cytotoxic activity from the fruits of Terminalia chebula. Archives of Pharmacal Research. 1995;18(2):118–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Deena Priscilla H, Jasmine R. Evaluation of in vitro anticancer activity of Terminalia chebula and Identification of Phytocompounds by GC MS analysis. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research. 2016;8(7):683–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kampa M, Nifli A-P, Notas G, Castanas E. Polyphenols and cancer cell growth. Reviews of physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology. 2007:79–113. doi: 10.1007/112_2006_0702 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Briguglio G, Costa C, Pollicino M, Giambò F, Catania S, Fenga C. Polyphenols in cancer prevention: New insights. International Journal of Functional Nutrition. 2020;1(2):1-. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Losso JN, Bansode RR, Trappey A II, Bawadi HA, Truax R. In vitro anti-proliferative activities of ellagic acid. The Journal of nutritional biochemistry. 2004;15(11):672–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2004.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Li LW, Na C, Tian SY, Chen J, Ma R, Gao Y, et al. Ellagic acid induces HeLa cell apoptosis via regulating signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 signaling. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2018;16(1):29–36. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.6182 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Chung Y-C, Lu L-C, Tsai M-H, Chen Y-J, Chen Y-Y, Yao S-P, et al. The inhibitory effect of ellagic acid on cell growth of ovarian carcinoma cells. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2013;2013. doi: 10.1155/2013/306705 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Larrosa M, Tomás-Barberán FA, Espín JC. The dietary hydrolysable tannin punicalagin releases ellagic acid that induces apoptosis in human colon adenocarcinoma Caco-2 cells by using the mitochondrial pathway. The Journal of nutritional biochemistry. 2006;17(9):611–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2005.09.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kao T-Y, Chung Y-C, Hou Y-C, Tsai Y-W, Chen C-H, Chang H-P, et al. Effects of ellagic acid on chemosensitivity to 5-fluorouracil in colorectal carcinoma cells. Anticancer research. 2012;32(10):4413–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Pucci B, Kasten M, Giordano A. Cell cycle and apoptosis. Neoplasia. 2000;2(4):291–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.neo.7900101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Javed A, Yarmohammadi M, Korkmaz KS, Rubio-Tomás T. The Regulation of Cyclins and Cyclin-Dependent Kinases in the Development of Gastric Cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24(3):2848. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032848 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Zhao H, Ming T, Tang S, Ren S, Yang H, Liu M, et al. Wnt signaling in colorectal cancer: Pathogenic role and therapeutic target. Molecular Cancer. 2022;21(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12943-022-01616-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Umesalma S, Nagendraprabhu P, Sudhandiran G. Ellagic acid inhibits proliferation and induced apoptosis via the Akt signaling pathway in HCT-15 colon adenocarcinoma cells. Molecular and cellular biochemistry. 2015;399(1):303–13. doi: 10.1007/s11010-014-2257-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Chen H-S, Bai M-H, Zhang T, Li G-D, Liu M. Ellagic acid induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis through TGF-β/Smad3 signaling pathway in human breast cancer MCF-7 cells. International journal of oncology. 2015;46(4):1730–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.González‐Sarrías A, Espín JC, Tomás‐Barberán FA, García‐Conesa MT. Gene expression, cell cycle arrest and MAPK signalling regulation in Caco‐2 cells exposed to ellagic acid and its metabolites, urolithins. Molecular nutrition & food research. 2009;53(6):686–98. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200800150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Chun-Hua Wang

8 Feb 2023

PONE-D-22-33541Extraction, phytochemical characterization and anti-cancer mechanism of Haritaki Churna: An ayurvedic formulation.PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Trivedi,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 25 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Chun-Hua Wang

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that this submission includes NMR spectroscopy data. We would recommend that you include the following information in your methods section or as Supporting Information files:

a) The make/source of the NMR instrument used in your study, as well as the magnetic field strength. For each individual experiment, please also list: the nucleus being measured; the sample concentration; the solvent in which the sample is dissolved and if solvent signal suppression was used; the reference standard and the temperature.

b) A list of the chemical shifts for all compounds characterised by NMR spectroscopy, specifying, where relevant: the chemical shift (δ), the multiplicity and the coupling constants (in Hz), for the appropriate nuclei used for assignment.

c)The full integrated NMR spectrum, clearly labelled with the compound name and chemical structure.

We also strongly encourage authors to provide primary NMR data files, in particular for new compounds which have not been characterised in the existing literature. Authors should provide the acquisition data, FID files and processing parameters for each experiment, clearly labelled with the compound name and identifier, as well as a structure file for each provided dataset. See our list of recommended repositories here: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories

3. Please note that PLOS ONE has specific guidelines on code sharing for submissions in which author-generated code underpins the findings in the manuscript. In these cases, all author-generated code must be made available without restrictions upon publication of the work. Please review our guidelines at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/materials-and-software-sharing#loc-sharing-code and ensure that your code is shared in a way that follows best practice and facilitates reproducibility and reuse.

4. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript: 

"This work was supported by the Department of Science and Technology (DST-SERB) grant to V.T. MR acknowledges the financial support in the form of a fellowship from Indian Institute of Technology- Guwahati, Assam, India."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. 

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows: 

"The author(s) received no specific funding for this work."

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

5. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

""Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

6. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels. 

  

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

7. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Partly

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors could improve the overall language of this manuscript to increase readability.

>Introduction: The introduction section of this study fails to relate with the previous study accurately. Rewrite this section and relate why this study is novel and its importance.

>Conclusion: This section is not properly written. You are suggested to write the major findings and its significance in few sentences.

>Some figures are blurry. Include figures with correct resolution.

Reviewer #2: I read with interest the paper and I believe that authors have taken into account a topic worthy to be investigated.

A good match between in vitro investigation and chemical characterization is clearly highlighted.

In my review I want to underline the strenghts, but I need to raise some fundamental limits of the work.

Strenghts:

I appreciate how authors planned the work, aiming first to provide with a simple but well performed protocol that was able to obtain some practical (and thus sounding) preclinical results.

Indeed the fact that authors studied the actual preparation used in ayurveda (i.e. maybe water is not the best solvent to extract Terminalia, but it is the solvent that practioners use), they considered the gastric stability, the effectiveness of phytocomplex, fractions and single compounds and tested samples in cancer and normal cell lines are all together basic good experimental practices in phytotherapy, too often underrated.

Limits:

I have to admit that this work opened many different interesting scientific questions, but many things remain unsolved.

The chemical characterization has been done but, due to the lack of reference standards, the quantification of ellagic acid as well other effective compounds is missing.

Authors should have completed the gastrointestonal stability simulation, by adding the simulation of the activity of bile salts and pancreatin at pH 6.8-7.2.

Finally, molecular mechanism were not investigated.

Please check carefully spelling errors.

Reviewer #3: The pictures in the article are not clear and the pixels do not meet the publication requirements.

The purity of the compound is not high.

Neither the fraction nor the compound activity is very strong.

Reviewer #4: This manuscript reports the extraction, phytochemical characterization, and anti-cancer mechanism of Haritaki Churna. The anti-cancer activity, safety, toxicity, stability analysis of Haritaki churna was tested, and the active ingredient significantly contributed into anti-cancer effect of HCAE was isolated and improved to played activity by degrading the genomic DNA and inducing the cellular viability,The overall logic of the paper is clear.Personally, the manuscript might require little revision prior to be considered to be acceptable or not due to that:

1. In figure 4, the retention time of B, and D need to be increased for easy observation about all compounds in the condition.

2. In figure 5, the structure of the compound is recommended to be beautified in the same format.

3. The accuracy of the mass spectrometry data in the article needs to be improved to four decimal places, and needs to be consistent, such as line 338 and 341.

4. In 3.5, please add the amount of each fraction separated.

Reviewer #5: The current study reported that the ayurvedic formulation, Haritaki churna (HC), has anti-cancer activity in different cancer cell lines and potential mechanisms. The authors checked the bioavailability of HC and it’s activity against different cancer cell lines. They further explored the active pharmaceutical ingredient in HC, tested the contributions of those phytochemicals, and found that Ellagic acid significantly contributes to the anti-cancer effect of HCAE. However, the present form can’t be accepted for publication.

1. The manuscript needs to be polished the English grammar or spelling by a native speaker.

Inconsistent hyphenation throughout the manuscript. Like anti-cancer vs anticancer, gastro-intestinal vs gastrointestinal, etc. Both ways are acceptable, but you have to keep consistent.

American English and British English are mixed used.

Grammar and punctuation mistakes everywhere

2. The last decade has seen remarkable progress in cancer research, with a significant update to many theories. But most of the citations here have been published for more than ten years.

The format of references is seriously inconsistent. For instance, ref 37 is in a different form from ref 36.

3. All experiment data need to have supported tables or figures, for section 3.1, no tables or figures are cited.

4. Section 3.3, the authors stated, “HC aqueous extract had not affected the cellular viability of HEK-293 cells up to concentration of 300 µg/ml. In addition, it is not affecting the cellular morphology as well (Figure 2B).”.

However, we can see significant changes in morphology in HEK293 in Figure 2B. And there is no discussion for these changes.

5. Figure 5, since there are different subfigures, please cite them separately according to the results.

6. Section 3.9, “This increase in anticancer activity may be attributed to their antagonistic action. Their antagonistic action may be (a) because of these phytochemicals competing for the same protein which is crucial in pathway of killing cancer cells or (b) may be because of formation of a complex polyphenol mixture which are unable to perform their individual activities. “

References to support this discussion are missing.

7. Section 3.10. Three independent repeated experiments are needed to get the mean ± SD/ SEM and reliable results. While the results here seem only come from a one-off experiment.

8. Current data is not strong enough to make the conclusion that “ellagic acid is capable of arresting cell cycle progression in S-phase and induction of apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells”

More experiment such as Western Bloting to check the cell cyle stage-dependant makers is needed, such as Cyclin A, Cyclin B…

The same for apoptosis, more experimental evidence is needed.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Marco Biagi

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: No

Reviewer #5: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 May 31;18(5):e0286274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286274.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


5 Apr 2023

From 11.03.2023

Dr. Vishal Trivedi

Professor,

Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering

Indian Institute of Technology-Guwahati

Guwahati-Assam India-781039

To

The Editor,

Plos One

Dear Editor,

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to submit a revised draft of our manuscript titled “Extraction, phytochemical characterization and anti-cancer mechanism of Haritaki Churna: An ayurvedic formulation” to Plos One journal We appreciate the time and work you and the reviewers put into giving useful criticism on the paper. We have been able to incorporate changes to reflect most of the suggestions provided by the reviewers. We have highlighted the changes within the manuscript.

The revised manuscript has sufficient merit to be published in your Journal. We have no conflict of interest in any part of this article and none of the material has been published or is under consideration elsewhere.

All authors have contributed to, seen, and approved the final, submitted version of the manuscript.

With best regards,

Vishal Trivedi

Response to reviewer

Reviewer 1:

Comment 1: The authors could improve the overall language of this manuscript to increase readability.

Response: English is edited, corrected by online English editing software Grammarly and another colleague proof read the manuscript. Language is of journal’s desired standard.

Comment 2: Introduction: The introduction section of this study fails to relate with the previous study accurately. Rewrite this section and relate why this study is novel and its importance.

Response to comment 2: The introduction section has been modified as per the requirement. (L56-L80)

Comment 3: Conclusion: This section is not properly written. You are suggested to write the major findings and its significance in few sentences.

Response to comment 3: As suggested, The conclusion section has been modified as per the requirement. (L626-639)

Comment 4: Some figures are blurry. Include figures with correct resolution

Response to comment 4: The figures re-submitted to journal are of publication quality with high resolution of 300 dpi. All the figures have been prepared again as per journal requirements.

Reviewer 2:

Comment 1: The chemical characterization has been done but, due to the lack of reference standards, the quantification of ellagic acid as well other effective compounds is missing.

Response to comment 1: Quantification of gallic acid, methyl gallate and ellagic was done using the respective standards. The standard curves were drawn after spiking different concentrations of GA, MG and EA in a gradient HPLC chromatogram. The calibration curve of different phytochemical was used to quantify. This data is included in supplementary data-2. The write up of quantification of GA, MG and EA are included in main manuscript from Line 477-481.

Comment 2: Authors should have completed the gastrointestinal stability simulation, by adding the simulation of the activity of bile salts and pancreatin at pH 6.8-7.2.

Response to comment 2:

• In order to test the efficacy of HC and HCAE in simulated intestinal fluids (SIF), two types of dissolution media were used that could mimic the condition in fasted (FaSSIF) and fed state (FeSSIF). These dissolution media primarily contain bile salts and pancreatin at pH 6.5 and pH 5.8

• The recipe to prepare FaSSIF and FeSSIF have been included in Materials and methods section as section 2.6.2 and 2.6.3

• HC was extracted in FaSSIF and FeSSIF and no significant changes in the compositional make up of the extracts when compared to its aqueous extract. Further, HCAE was incubated in FaSSIF and FeSSIF from 0-6 hours at a time interval of 2 hours. A decrease in reduction in intensity of compound 11, 12 (chebulagic acid and chebulinic acid) and an increase in intensity of compound 13 (ellagic acid) was observed with progression of incubation periods. The increase in intensity of ellagic acid in HCAE incubated with FaSSIF and FeSSIF showed reduction in IC50 values when tested on DLD1 cancer cells for 48 hours of treatment.

• The write up explaining the result have been discussed in section 3.7 from Line 424-440

• A new figure (Figure 7) have been included in manuscript to explain the results of effect of simulated intestinal conditions on HCAE

Comment 3: Finally, molecular mechanism was not investigated.

Response to comment 3:

• Molecular mechanism explaining the death of colorectal cancer cells is discussed in section 3.11. Further, the in-depth mechanism of killing of DLD1 cancer cells upon treatment with ellagic acid was discussed with respect to up-regulation and down-regulation of apoptotic, necroptotic and cell signaling proteins through western blotting.

• The write up of results of western blotting experiments are discussed in section 3.10 & 3.11 from Line 521-563

• Two new panels (9G & 9H) have been added in Figure 9

Comment 4: Please check carefully spelling errors.

Response to comment 4: Spelling errors have been corrected wherever necessary. English is edited, corrected by online English editing software Grammarly and another colleague proof read the manuscript. Language is of journal’s desired standard.

Reviewer 3:

Comment 1: The pictures in the article are not clear and the pixels do not meet the publication requirements.

Response to comment 1: The figures re-submitted to journal are of publication quality with high resolution of 300 dpi. All the figures have been prepared again as per journal requirements

Comment 2: The purity of the compound is not high.

Response: I agree with your observation as few minor peaks are appearing in HPLC chromatogram of isolated phytochemicals from HCAE (Supplementary data 2). The most of the phytochemicals isolated from HCAE and used in the current study are more than 95% pure. It is known that the isolated pure phytochemicals from plant are prone to degradation, modification (oxidation) and appearance of additional peaks on the HPLC chromatogram could be due to these reasons. The compound present in minor peaks is very less and may not cause any significant impact on the anti-cancer activity reported by us.

Comment 3: Neither the fraction nor the compound activity is very strong.

Response to comment 3: The individual fractions anti-cancer activities has been discussed section 3.8. All the fractions are not active, but fraction 2 and fraction 5 show greater activity than the aqueous extract. Since it was a deductive approach, we were able to rule out certain fractions that were not as good as fractions 2 and 5. Further, individual anti-cancer activities of each compound have also been reported in the manuscript which correlate with the previously published literature.

Reviewer 4:

Comment 1: In figure 4, the retention time of B, and D need to be increased for easy observation about all compounds in the condition.

Response to comment 1: Figure 4 have been updated. The retentions times of all the fractions now show from 0 to 30 minutes

Comment 2: In figure 5, the structure of the compound is recommended to be beautified in the same format.

Response to comment 2: Figure 5 have been beautified as per requirement.

Comment 3: The accuracy of the mass spectrometry data in the article needs to be improved to four decimal places, and needs to be consistent, such as line 338 and 341.

Response to comment 3: The accuracy of the mass spectrometer data has been updated to four decimals in section 2.13 and section 3.6

Comment 4: In 3.5, please add the amount of each fraction separated.

Response to comment 4: The amount of each fraction separated is added in section 3.5 from Line 350-352

Reviewer 5:

Comment 1: The manuscript needs to be polished the English grammar or spelling by a native speaker.

Inconsistent hyphenation throughout the manuscript. Like anti-cancer vs anticancer, gastro-intestinal vs gastrointestinal, etc. Both ways are acceptable, but you have to keep consistent.

American English and British English are mixed used.

Response to comment 1: English grammatical mistakes were corrected through out the manuscript and consistency of single language system is maintained.

Comment 2: The last decade has seen remarkable progress in cancer research, with a significant update to many theories. But most of the citations here have been published for more than ten years.

Response to comment 2: The citations with reference to cancer research have been updated wherever applicable. New references have been added and old references have been removed.

Comment 3: All experiment data need to have supported tables or figures, for section 3.1, no tables or figures are cited.

Response to comment 3: Table 1 has been cited in section 3.1 and has been updated in line 297

Comment 4: Section 3.3, the authors stated, “HC aqueous extract had not affected the cellular viability of HEK-293 cells up to concentration of 300 µg/ml. In addition, it is not affecting the cellular morphology as well (Figure 2B). However, we can see significant changes in morphology in HEK293 in Figure 2B. And there is no discussion for these changes.

Response to comment 4: “Blebbing in HEK-293 cells treated with higher concentration (500µg/ml) of HCAE was observed (Figure 2B). However, these protrusions have been found in HEK-293 cells at doses greater than those necessary to kill colorectal cancer cells”. The discussion pertaining to comment 4 have been updated in Line 328-330

Comment 5: Figure 5, since there are different subfigures, please cite them separately according to the results.

Response to comment 5: Subfigures of figure 5 have been cited next to the names of the compounds identified in section 3.6

Comment 6: Section 3.9, “This increase in anticancer activity may be attributed to their antagonistic action. Their antagonistic action may be (a) because of these phytochemicals competing for the same protein which is crucial in pathway of killing cancer cells or (b) may be because of formation of a complex polyphenol mixture which are unable to perform their individual activities. References to support this discussion are missing

Response to comment 6: Relevant reference supporting the statement is been added in the revised manuscript.

Comment 7: Section 3.10. Three independent repeated experiments are needed to get the mean ± SD/ SEM and reliable results. While the results here seem only come from a one-off experiment.

Response to comment 7: Standard deviation values for the experiment discussed in section 3.10 have been updated in Line 524-526

Comment 8: Current data is not strong enough to make the conclusion that “ellagic acid is capable of arresting cell cycle progression in S-phase and induction of apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells” More experiment such as Western Blotting to check the cell cycle stage-dependent makers is needed, such as Cyclin A, Cyclin B…

The same for apoptosis, more experimental evidence is needed.

Response to comment 8:

• Molecular mechanism explaining the death of colorectal cancer cells is discussed in section 3.11. Further, the in-depth mechanism of killing of DLD1 cancer cells upon treatment with ellagic acid was discussed with respect to up-regulation and down-regulation of apoptotic, necroptotic and cell signaling proteins through western blotting.

• Western blotting of caspase 8, cleaved caspase 8, caspase 3, cleaved caspase 3, PARP-1, Bcl2, cytochrome-c, MLKL, p-MLKL, RIP, and p-RIP have been included in the results section which rule out extrinsic pathway of apoptosis and necroptosis happening upon treatment with ellagic acid at different concentration for 24 and 48 hours.

• Further, expression levels of cyclin A2 and cyclin D1 were recorded using western blotting. Cyclin A2 levels lowered in both time points, but cyclin D1 was predominantly lowered in 48 hours of treatment.

• The write up of results of western blotting experiments are discussed in section 3.10 & 3.11 from Line 521-563

• Two new panels (9G & 9H) have been added in Figure 9 showing the western blot results obtained.

• The discussion and conclusion section have also been updated with reference to the new data included in the manuscript.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Chun-Hua Wang

12 May 2023

Extraction, phytochemical characterization and anti-cancer mechanism of Haritaki Churna: An ayurvedic formulation.

PONE-D-22-33541R1

Dear Dr. Trivedi,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Chun-Hua Wang

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #5: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #5: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #5: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #5: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #5: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #5: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #5: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Chun-Hua Wang

22 May 2023

PONE-D-22-33541R1

Extraction, phytochemical characterization and anti-cancer mechanism of Haritaki Churna: An ayurvedic formulation.

Dear Dr. Trivedi:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Chun-Hua Wang

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data. NMR and LC-MS data for compounds isolated from HCAE.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Data. Purity of compounds isolated from HCAE and quantification of GA, MG and EA in HCAE using standard curves.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Data. Cell viability assays for fractions and compounds isolated from HCAE against colorectal cancer (DLD1, HCT-116 and HT-29) cell lines.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Raw images. Raw images of western blots.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES