SUMMARY
The majority of the world population carry the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori. Fortunately, most individuals experience only low-grade or no symptoms, but in many cases the chronic inflammatory infection develops into severe gastric disease, including duodenal ulcer disease and gastric cancer. Here we report on a protective mechanism where H. pylori attachment and accompanying chronic mucosal inflammation can be reduced by antibodies that are present in a vast majority of H. pylori carriers. These antibodies block binding of the H. pylori attachment protein BabA by mimicking BabA’s binding to the ABO blood group glycans in the gastric mucosa. However, many individuals demonstrate low titers of BabA blocking antibodies, which is associated with an increased risk for duodenal ulceration, suggesting a role for these antibodies in preventing gastric disease.
Keywords: Helicobacter pylori, BabA, adhesion, ABO blood group antigens, glycan mimicry, duodenal ulcer disease, gastric cancer, broadly blocking antibody
INTRODUCTION
Chronic life-long infection by Helicobacter pylori is the main cause of chronic active gastritis, which can lead to severe clinical conditions including gastric and duodenal ulcer disease and gastric cancer. All these diseases except gastric cancer have become curable by H. pylori eradication 1,2; however, gastric cancer remains a major threat to human life with about 1.2 million new cases every year with a poor survival rate, with ~25 million deaths since the year 2000 3–5. About 5–10% of H. pylori-infected individuals experience duodenal ulcer disease, which, although curable, can perforate causing bleeding with a high mortality 6. Patients with ulcers or gastric cancer typically carry the more virulent “triple-positive infections” characterized by H. pylori bearing the CagA onco-effector protein, the VacA toxin, and the Blood group Antigen Binding (BabA) attachment protein (adhesin) 7,8. BabA is a member of the H. pylori outer membrane protein family and binds to the ABO/Lewis b (Leb) blood group antigens expressed in the gastro-intestinal lining, including the gastric epithelium 9–12. BabA exhibits rapid and diversifying selection through amino acid substitutions in its Leb-carbohydrate binding domain (CBD) that adapts its binding preferences for different human populations and ABO blood group phenotypes 11,13,14. The rapid mutation and selection in BabA also allow for adaptation to the individual and optimal binding to the different locations and microenvironments in the stomach, including adaptation to shifts in acidity caused by diseases such as peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer and adaptation by shifts in its binding affinity 14. As a consequence, BabA exhibits extensive global diversity where nearly every infected individual will harbor a strain of H. pylori possessing a unique BabA sequence. H. pylori infections induce high antibody titers against several dominant antigens, such as its urease enzyme, but these antibodies fail to clear the infection. Hence, H. pylori infections instead become persistent and life-long. By contrast, most H. pylori outer membrane proteins, including BabA, are reported to be weakly antigenic 15–17. Immunoglobulin G is induced by gastro-intestinal (GI) pathogens also in the gut and by H. pylori virulence factors in both the gastric antrum and the corpus mucosa 18,19. Therefore, we tested ~1000 patient sera and found that the vast majority exhibited blocking IgG antibodies (Abs) that inhibited BabA-mediated Leb binding. Surprisingly, the patient sera turned out to efficiently block Leb-binding of world-wide H. pylori strains, suggesting the presence of broadly blocking IgG Abs (bbAbs). We also found that patients with duodenal ulcer disease (DU) exhibited low titers of bbAbs. This result suggests that the IgG-mediated blocking activity is protective throughout the GI tract. To identify the bbAb binding epitopes in BabA, we cloned a human antibody, Anti-BabA, denoted as ABbA, from healthy H. pylori carriers and co-crystalized it with BabA. The co-crystal structure showed that ABbA and Leb bind to the same residues in the BabA CBD. Thus, ABbA is resistant to microbial antigen variation and instead performs fulminant glycan mimicry to block and compete with BabA-mediated Leb binding to reduce mucosal attachment of H. pylori. Our results indicate that the host’s blocking antibody response has co-evolved with H. pylori as a way of tolerating chronic infection and reducing the risk for overt gastric disease by mitigating mucosal inflammation. We believe that the bbAbs reported here offer translational applications in treatment and predictive diagnostics for individuals at risk for severe gastric disease.
RESULTS
Human serum antibodies block ABO/Leb binding and attachment of H. pylori bacteria to the gastric mucosa
To test if human immune responses during chronic H. pylori infection raise factors that reduce bacterial adherence, we tested sera from six individuals, four of whom were ELISA positive for H. pylori and two of whom were H. pylori negative. We found that three of the four positive sera samples fully inhibited or reduced epithelial attachment of the clinical isolate H. pylori J166 to the human gastric mucosa (Figure 1A). Two tests were used to identify the nature of the serum samples’ inhibitory activity. First, the inhibitory activity was scored as the serum dilution at which half maximal H. pylori bacterial binding to Leb was lost, i.e., the 50% Inhibition Titer (IT50). Hence, the IT50s tightly reflected the strength of the serum samples in inhibition of H. pylori attachment to the gastric mucosa (Figure 1B). Second, the IgG antibodies were specifically desorbed from the serum sample, which resulted in >95% loss of the inhibitory activity (Figure 1C), suggesting that the broadly blocking activity resides in the IgG antibody fraction. These results show that individuals with H. pylori infection can raise attachment-blocking IgG antibodies that inhibit Leb binding and thus reduce H. pylori adherence to the gastric mucosa.
Worldwide high prevalence of serum IT50s.
The results from Figure 1A suggest that many individuals infected by H. pylori might be positive for Leb IT50s. Thus, in a pilot study we tested a group of 38 asymptomatic carriers of H. pylori infection from the Karolinska University Hospital (KI), Sweden, and found that 22 (58%) of the sera reduced Leb binding with IT50s that ranged 100-fold, from ~10 to >2000 (Figure 1D). To determine if most individuals who are ELISA-positive for H. pylori raise antibodies that inhibit Leb binding, we tested 742 individual serum samples from both healthy individuals and from patients with gastric disease. For the IT50 tests, we used two H. pylori strains, 17875/Leb and J166, described in Tables S1B-E), with high 11 vs. low (Figure S1D and Figure S2B) Leb-binding affinity, respectively. First, we tested a group of 322 volunteers, all ELISA positive, i.e., H. pylori carriers, from the Kalixanda Study of the Swedish general adult population, an essentially “gastric healthy” cohort 20. We found that the Kalixanda serum samples similarly ranged 100-fold in IT50s and identified 270 (84%) IT50-positive sera whereas the remaining 16% did not demonstrate IT50s above background and were defined as negative (Figure 1E). Notably, the IT50s demonstrated a strong correlation with the presence of antibodies against the onco-marker CagA (Figure S1Eii), whereas the IT50-positive sera did not correlate with the H. pylori ELISA titers (Figure S1Eiii). Second, for comparison, 420 patients with H. pylori infection and gastric disease from Ukraine, the US, and Mexico were tested, and 56%, 59%, and 72% were IT50-positive, respectively (Figure S1F). Leb binding tests showed that 81% (26/32) of the Mexican H. pylori clinical isolates bound to Leb (Table S2B), and the corresponding sera IT50s correlated with Leb binding (Wilcoxon p = 0.036) (Figure S1G). Thus, the worldwide high prevalence of IT50s against Leb binding closely mirrors the 60%–80% world-wide prevalence of Leb binding among H. pylori isolates 11.
Serum IT50s increase with age.
The IT50s in the Kalixanda population increased from mid-age to high-age in both women and men, with two exceptions – in the 31-40-year age group men had 4-fold higher IT50s (Wilcoxon rank, p = 0.028) (Figure 1F). It is noteworthy that the IT50 augmentations coincided with men’s age of onset of DU 20,21, where the age-matched increased IT50s might constitute protective antibody responses, as only 5% of the Kalixanda individuals had macroscopic gastric lesions 20. To test if the IT50 increases with age also at the individual level, we tested serum samples collected from two individuals in the timespans from 39 to 65 years of age and from 62 to 80 years of age, respectively. Similar to the Kalixanda cohort, both individuals’ IT50s increased by age and reached a high plateau at ~55–65 years of age. In contrast, the ELISA levels did not change, which agreed with the lack of correlation between ELISA and IT50 (Figure 1G and Figure S1Eiii). This suggests that the IT50s do not level out or decrease at higher age either on the population level or on the individual level. To understand how early IT50s develop, we tested children from 3 to 17 years of age (all ELISA-positive H. pylori carriers). We found that 47% (17/36) of the sera demonstrated IT50s from 5 years of age (Figure 1H). The combined results showed that antibodies that inhibit Leb binding are formed already at an early age in response to H. pylori infections and are present and active throughout the lifespan.
The serum IT50 antibodies bind to structural BabA epitopes.
To characterize the epitope preferences for the antibodies that block Leb binding, we tested serum samples from each of the KI/Sweden, Ukraine, US, Mexico, and Kalixanda populations. The sera samples from all six global populations detected the Blood group Antigen Binding (BabA) protein, but only under semi-native conditions, suggesting that the antibodies do not recognize the denatured, linear epitopes but preferentially bind to structural epitopes in BabA (Figure 1I and Figure S1H).
Thus, testing of the 780 global individual H. pylori carriers suggested that (1) blocking antibodies (IT50s) are present in a vast majority of individuals, (2) IT50 levels are highly individual and do not correlate with the ELISA level, (3) the IT50 responses are more prominent against the oncogenic CagA-positive H. pylori infections, (4) the IT50s are active over the lifetime of the individual, and (5) the IT50s are raised against world-wide conserved structural BabA epitopes instead of antigenic variable linear epitopes.
The serum IT50 is derived from the activity of broadly blocking antibodies
To determine if the individual IT50 can also block Leb-binding of global, phylo-distant H. pylori strains, six Swedish serum samples (stars in Figure 1D) were tested against 12 H. pylori isolates from Europe, Asia, and the Americas, including the IT50 reference strains 17875/Leb and J166 (Figures 2A and 2B). All six serum samples inhibited Leb binding of all 12 strains, i.e., all individual sera exhibited broadly blocking antibody activity (Figure 2A). The IT50s against strain 17875/Leb reflected the general inhibition strength of the six serum samples. Notably, the two LOW inhibitory sera preferentially inhibited the H. pylori strains J166 and I9, which were lower in Leb binding affinity (Figure S1D and 14). Reciprocally, the four HIGH inhibitory sera were less discriminating in inhibiting the 12 strains (Figure S2A). The results on the sera broadly blocking antibody activities help explain why the series of 780 global serum samples were so efficient in inhibiting strains 17875/Leb and J166 (Figures 1 and S1) that both originate from Europe (Figure 2B and22.
H. pylori with higher-affinity Leb-binding is a risk factor for overt gastric disease
To understand how Leb binding affinity affects the serum inhibition of H. pylori attachment to the gastric mucosa, we exposed strains 17875/Leb and J166, with high vs. low Leb binding affinity, respectively, to serum from individual 1 from Figures 1A and 1B. A 25-fold dilution of the serum reduced the attachment of strain J166 10-fold compared to strain 17875/Leb (p < 0.0001) (Figure 3A). Thus, the low-affinity Leb-binding strain J166 was more efficiently inhibited by serum antibodies in terms of both Leb binding (Figure 2A) and attachment to the gastric mucosa (Figure 3A). Thus, we re-analyzed the series of Swedish H. pylori isolates from patients with GA or DU for their Leb affinity 11 because the CagA, VacA, BabA “triple positive” virulence markers are present in almost all DU and gastric cancer strains 7,8. Indeed, the DU strains demonstrated higher binding affinity (Wilcoxon p ≤ 0.05) (Figure 3B and Table S2A). Similarly, the Mexican Leb-binding DU isolates demonstrated higher binding strength compared to the GA isolates (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 0.0015) (Figure S3A).
Low IT50 is a risk factor for overt gastric disease
Because more blocking antibodies, i.e., higher IT50s, are required to prevent the HIGH-affinity Leb-binding H. pylori strains from adhering to the gastric mucosa, and because the “triple-positive strains” with BabA of HIGH Leb-binding strength constitute a risk factor for overt gastric disease, we next tested if a low individual IT50 can be regarded a risk factor for overt gastric disease. Importantly, during gastric cancer (GC) progression and loss of gastric acidity, the H. pylori infections often fade and disappear, with a parallel decrease or loss of antibodies against H. pylori 23. Thus, the IT50s from patients with GC could be erroneously low. Instead, DU patients were chosen for this investigation because the chronic H. pylori infection can readily adapt to the acidified environment. Hence, we selected a series of 79 serum samples from age-matched patients with DU or Non-Atrophic “healthier” Gastritis (NAG) from Mexico. First, the IT50s ranged several 100-fold, but the NAG sera displayed generally higher IT50s (Figure S3B), whereas the general ELISA titers were similar (Figure S3C). Second, we calculated the full range of odds ratios (ORs) and their p-values for sera samples with high vs. low IT50 for the NAG vs. DU group. By using sliding windows and ROC diagrams, we identified IT50 ~30 as a risk factor (Rf) for DU, by strain 17875/Leb, where the highest OR of 4.75 coincided with the highest significance (Figures 3C and 3Di). We also tested the high-affinity Leb-binding Mc1204 isolate from the cognate Mexican group and identified IT50 ~15 as an Rf where the highest OR of 3.74 coincided with the highest significance (Figures 3Dii and S3Di), i.e., the two strains produced similar low IT50s as Rfs. The critical ORs were confirmed by ROC diagrams (Figure S3E) and by permutation tests (Figure S3F). This series of results suggest that individuals with low IT50 serum levels are at a higher risk for DU. Notably, the 1:15 serum dilution required to completely block attachment to the gastric mucosa of the high affinity binding strain 17875 (Figure 3A) corresponded to IT50~10 when tested using 17875. Thus, the IT50 serum titers must exceed the critical Rf IT50 ~30 in order to provide for the IT50~10 level of adherence blocking efficacy in the gastric mucosal lining. To understand how the Rf IT50 ~30 relates to gastric disease in populations worldwide, we next aligned the IT50s of all individuals from Kalixanda, Ukraine, USA, and Mexico. This identified a ~30% higher prevalence of individuals with protective IT50s >30 in the healthier Kalixanda general adult population compared to the global gastric disease patients and hence a predisposition for lower IT50 among individuals with gastric disease (Figure 3E and Table S4). Our results suggest that DU patients often carry the high-affinity Leb-binding H. pylori, i.e., the strains that require higher IT50 sera for blocking of Leb binding and hence reduction of H. pylori attachment; however, the DU group of patients often presented with lower and thus insufficient IT50 titers of protective bbAbs.
Cloning and identification of the bbAbs
For a better understanding of the mAbs that correspond to the human sera IT50s, we next cloned and expressed the natural blocking mAbs from their original source, i.e., from individuals with high IT50s. First, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected from the three volunteer donors with the highest IT50s – namely, individuals 6, 10, and 16 in Figure 1D. Their antibody repertoires were then cloned into a phage-display library, and 14 single-chain variable fragment (scFv)-phages were bio-panned and isolated using the 17875/Leb BabA protein as the affinity matrix (denoted as ABbAs (Anti-BabAs). Six of the clones (43%) had identical sequences, so this mAb was denoted ABbA(1) (Figure S4A). To determine if ABbA(1) functionally corresponds to the inhibitory antibodies in serum, two tests were performed with an expressed ABbA(1)-scFv 24. First, the ABbA(1)-scFv was found to strongly inhibit Leb binding with an inhibitory concentration 50% (IC50) of 27 ng/mL (Figure S4B). Second, ABbA(1)-scFv was found to bind specifically to 17875/Leb bacteria but not to the isogenic babA-minus mutants (Figure S4C). Thus, ABbA(1) exhibited both the necessary affinity and specificity properties. Then, for improved stability and avidity, ABbA(1)-scFv was expressed as a human IgG1 antibody, denoted ABbA(1)-IgG mAb (and named ABbA). Three tests were performed to determine if ABbA itself demonstrated broadly blocking Ab activity. ABbA was tested against the series of 12 global H. pylori strains (from Figure 2A). Notably, ABbA reduced both the Leb binding (Figure 4A) and the attachment to human gastric mucosa (Figure 4B) of the majority (9/12) of world-wide H. pylori strains from Figure 2A and hence exhibited a broadly blocking activity. Thus, ABbA can protect the mucosa from H. pylori attachment. Third, to understand the epitope preferences that might explain the broadly blocking ABbA properties, we applied the semi-native-immunoblot method and found that ABbA bound only to folded structural BabA epitopes and not to denatured linear epitopes. Thus, the ABbA mAb binds BabA similarly to the human (polyclonal) serum antibodies from infected individuals (Figure 4C vs. Figure 1I and Figure S1H). Finally, the efficacy, specificity, and affinity of the IgG mAb was assessed by five different tests. First, the ABbA-IgG efficacy increased ~15-fold in IC50 concentration compared to ABbA-scFv (Figure S4B). Second, ABbA bound specifically to BabA but did not recognize the non-Leb-binding BabB paralog (Figure S4D). Third, electron microscopy showed that ABbA bound specifically to BabA on the surface of H. pylori bacteria (Figure S4E). Fourth, ITC tests demonstrated an affinity (Kd) to BabA of 10 nM (Figures S4Fi and S4Fii). Fifth, SPR tests showed the notably ~5-fold higher affinity to BabA of 2 nM (Figure S4G), which is a valid affinity for mAbs with potential for translational applications. Thus, the ABbA mAb exhibited similar high-affinity binding and specificity for BabA as the polyclonal patient sera with a remarkably efficient broadly blocking activity for worldwide H. pylori strains. How then does IT50 relate to the pool of bbAbs similar to ABbA in the blood circulation? Titration of a dilution series of ABbA mixed with sera from an IT50-negative individual showed that an IT50 = 70 equals ~1 µg/mL of ABbA (Figure 4D). Because human sera contains ~10 mg/mL IgG, the ABbA pool constitutes 1/10,000 part of the total IgG content or ~5mg mAbs, similar to ABbA out of the ~50g of total serum IgG in circulation. This series of results suggest that ABbA exhibits similar high-affinity binding for BabA as the polyclonal patient sera and that ABbA shows a remarkably broad binding-blocking and attachment-blocking activity for worldwide H. pylori strains.
ABbA performs glycan mimicry in its broadly blocking binding to structural epitopes
The ABbA binding epitope in BabA was identified in five consecutive steps. First, a BabA library was panned for ABbA binding, which identified a minimal 260aa fragment that included the full CBD (Figures 5A and S5A). Second, for detailed binding epitope mapping, a series of rabbit sera were raised against short peptides that sequentially overlapped with the CBD domain of strain 17875/Leb (Figure 5Bi). Only a single serum sample, denoted TB4, successfully outcompeted both the ABbA and the Leb binding (Figures 5Bii and 5Biii, respectively). The dual inhibition ability of TB4 serum suggested that the Leb-binding epitope architecture in the CBD tightly overlaps with the ABbA-binding epitopes because the critical Leb-binding DSS-Triad residues in the CBD Entrance loop are all present in the TB4 peptide and thus constitute binding epitopes for the TB4 serum (Figure 5Biv). However, in contrast to the bbAb activity of ABbA, the TB4 serum only blocked Leb binding of the cognate strain 17875/Leb and poorly inhibited worldwide isolates (Figure 5A vs. Figure S5C). This fundamental difference relates to the high degree of antigenic variation in the Entrance loop (Figure S5D). These results argue that human antibody responses against linear epitopes are not efficient in protecting against adaptive microbes that exhibit high mutation and amino acid substitution rates, in contrast to ABbA, which is less sensitive to antigenic variation due to its preference for structural binding epitopes. Third, for identification of the ABbA binding epitope in BabA, the ABbA co-complex crystal structure with BabA was determined to 2.76 Å resolution (Materials & Methods and Table S5). The BabA body domain is formed by a 4+3-helix bundle with a four-stranded β-plate insertion that forms the CBD located at the top of the body domain (Figure 5Ci). In the CBD, the CL2 cysteine loop and the Key-loop (DL1) and Entrance-loop (DL2) all contribute with binding sites for Leb (Figures 5Cii and 5D and S5E). The principal determinant of ABO/Leb antigens, the α1.2 secretor fucose, is bound by a pocket formed by the conserved CL2 loop, whereas Leb’s reducing end is bound by the DSS-Triad in the Entrance-loop 13,25 (Figures 5Cii and S5F). In the co-crystal structural model, ABbA binding targets these same three areas where the variable heavy (VH) residue W102 perfectly inserts into the α1.2 secretor fucose loci whereas VH residue L31 resides in a pocket formed by V231 in a position equivalent to the α1.4 Lewis fucose. In addition, VH binds to both D206 and N208 in the Key-loop and to the DSS triad (Figures 5Cii and 5D). Thus, ABbA competes with Leb in binding to BabA through functional glycan mimicry and binds the majority of amino acid residues in the CBD that are critical for Leb binding. Notably, ABbA W102 and L31 provide surrogates for the secretor and Lewis fucose by filling the two hydrophobic pockets, glycan mimicry 1 (GM1) and 2 (GM2), respectively, where the hydrophobic determinants of the L-enantiomeric fucose residues reside. Furthermore, in the third glycan mimicry domain (GM3), ABbA binds the DSS-Triad. Fourth, the glycan mimicry property was tested by mutagenesis, where BabA with the DSS-Triad replaced with AAA was expressed in H. pylori. The AAA mutant demonstrated complete loss of both ABbA and Leb binding. A single DSS vs. DAS mutant similarly lost all ABbA and Leb binding (Figures S5G and S5H).
Thus, the triple-locus glycan mimicry performance of ABbA provides a universal fit to the CBD despite its polymorphic landscape, and this works “hand-in-glove” to protect the ABbA mAb from immune escape and to help explain its broadly blocking properties.
Functional identification of the world-wide extended ABbA binding epitope.
To better understand the global broadly blocking repertoire of BabA epitopes for ABbA, we tested the ABbA efficiency in inhibition of Leb binding with 146 H. pylori world-wide clinical isolates. First, the IC50 of ABbA was found to range >100-fold, from efficient inhibition in 48% of strains (IC50s <1 nM) to no inhibition in 18% of the strains (IC50s >100 nM) (Table S6). Second, the ABbA binding strength was tested by 125I-labeled ABbA and was also found to range 100-fold (Table S6). Third, the IC50 and ABbA binding strength were found to strongly correlate (Figure S6A). Thus, less ABbA is needed for inhibition of Leb binding of the clinical isolates that exhibit stronger ABbA binding. Fourth, the ABbA and Leb binding strengths were found to correlate among worldwide strains (Figure S6B). However, the ABbA binding strength was higher for European, medium for Asian, and lower for the Indigenous American/Latin American H. pylori isolates (p < 0.001) (Figures 6A and S6C). This difference could be a consequence of the phylogenetic distance between the Old and the New World and hence be related to BabA antigenic variation, or it may be a consequence of functional adaptation to the difference in predominant ABO blood group phenotypes. This idea was supported by the finding that the Indigenous American/Latin American blood group O or A specialist binding strains were 7-fold more prevalent in the ABbA low binding strength group (p < 0.001) (Figure 6B). Furthermore, 81% of the Indigenous American/Latin American specialist strains were low, whereas 38% were high in ABbA binding strength (Figure 6C), i.e., H. pylori strains with adaptation to the specialist preference in binding were more prevalent in the ABbA low binding strength group (p < 0.0017). To better understand the global diversity in ABbA glycan mimicry, we aligned the BabA sequences according to their ABbA binding strength (Table S7). The alignment showed that low ABbA binding strength was associated with amino acid substitutions located in BabA’s Leb-binding landscape, where charged residues are replaced with small neutral or large hydrophobic amino acids (Figure 6D vs. Figure 5D). The high substitution level in these epitope positions corresponds to their high positive selection activity, i.e., positions where nucleotide mutations preferentially result in amino acid substitutions 11. These findings suggest that the lower ABbA binding strength and hence reduced epitope fit in the New World/Americas is a consequence of functional adaptation of the BabA binding preferences to the ABO blood group phenotypes in the local populations. Thus, rapid adaptation in BabA binding preference with critical amino acid residue replacements can lower the binding strength of the bbAbs with subsequent reduced immuno-protection, which is in line with the pandemic GC prevalence in South America 22.
Binding of the bbAbs to H. pylori is acid sensitive
In the gastric mucosa, H. pylori adherence needs to be synchronized with the desquamation and rapid turnover of the gastric epithelium. Close to the cell surfaces the pH is buffered by the bicarbonate system, but the pH quickly drops in the mucus layer towards the stomach lumen and its extremely acidic gastric juice. In the mucus layer, H. pylori adheres to the Leb glycosylated desquamated epithelial cells and large mucins 26 until the bacteria reach the critical acidic zone where BabA binding is inactivated and H. pylori breaks free from the Leb entanglement. Unusually well adapted to its environment, BabA binding is fully reversible after acid exposure, which allows for the detached H. pylori bacteria to return to the buffered environment where they reattach to the epithelium. In other words, H. pylori use the pH gradient for recycling of infection and thus are constantly functionally bio-panning for the next generation of fittest H. pylori 14. Two tests were performed to determine if BabA has adapted acid sensitivity in binding to also evade bbAbs. First, ABbA-IgG and ABbA-scFv were pH titrated for binding, and both showed a pH50 = 3.5 (the pH at which half the maximal ABbA binding was lost). Thus, ABbA binding is most similar in acid sensitivity to Leb binding by 17875/Leb (which also has pH50 = 3.5) (Figure 6E) and hence similar to the median pH50 = 3.7 for clinical H. pylori isolates 14. Second, to characterize the general acid sensitivity in serum antibodies that bind to H. pylori bacterial cells, the purified serum IgGs from individuals 1 (Figures 1A and 1B) and 10 (Figure 1D) were similarly pH50 titrated. The IgGs from both individual 1 and 10 were almost a full pH unit more acid sensitive in H. pylori binding (pH50 = 4.3/4.4) compared to ABbA (Figure 6E). The glycan mimicry performed by ABbA constitutes the most plausible explanation for the identical acid resistance in Leb and ABbA binding, with the “hand-in-glove-fit” to critical Leb binding residues such as the DSS-triad in the CBD with the aspartic acid (D) responding quickly to pH changes due to its acidic pKa ~3.5.
DISCUSSION
Human responses to H. pylori infection are well recognized to raise high levels of humoral and cell-mediated immunity, and although these antibodies form the basis for the clinical diagnostics, the immune responses fail to eradicate the infection and also fail to protect against reinfection after antibiotic treatment. H. pylori is inherited over the generations from our parents, i.e., through vertical dissemination in contrast to horizontal pandemics, and thus is persistent over the lifespan. The chronic outcome is understandable considering that H. pylori, over the millennia of human infections, has established multiple mechanisms to evade our immune responses through fast and confluent adaptation by high mutation rates and antigenic variation 27 combined with dysregulation of T-cell responses (reviewed in 28). The many escape routes are reflected in both the shortcomings of conventional H. pylori vaccine development 29 and the high re-infection rate in many parts of the world after eradication of infection with antibiotics 30,31. Fortunately, our results demonstrate that in the vast majority of H. pylori-infected individuals the humoral immune system responds with broadly blocking antibodies (bbAbs) (Figures 1 and S1) that target conserved structural epitopes in the Leb-binding domain in the otherwise highly polymorphic BabA adhesin. By doing so, the bbAbs perform functional glycan mimicry and can reduce H. pylori mucosal adherence by competing with and weakening the BabA-mediated Leb binding (Figure 5C). Glycan mimicry has been suggested for mAbs that compete with the sialic acid mono-saccharide residue of the influenza haemagglutinin ligand 32. In comparison, ABbA takes full advantage of the glycan mimicry strategy and performs mimicry of the two critical Leb-fucose residues located in the bottom and the wall of the CBD and, in addition, mimics the lactose in the Leb-core chain in the upper part of the CBD. Thus, ABbA performs “wall-to-wall” triple-locus glycan mimicry, and this strategy allows ABbA to function despite numerous amino acid substitutions in BabA over the lifetime of the individual. As a proof of concept in this work, the triple glycan mimicry enabled ABbA to block most of the world-wide H. pylori strains despite the unprecedented high level of polymorphism in BabA. Notably, this glycan mimicry mechanism that blocks mucosal adherence does not constitute an Achilles heel for H. pylori infections per se because our immune system nevertheless does not manage to eradicate the H. pylori infection. Similarly, the ~30% of H. pylori infections in Western-Europe and the United States among individuals with predominant non-atrophic gastritis, where H. pylori does not express BabA and does not bind Leb, are still persistent over the lifespan 7,10,33. However, the glycan mimicry of bbAbs can suppress the adherent-inflammatory lifestyle of H. pylori among those individuals who carry the triple-positive H. pylori infection, which express BabA/VacA/CagA and are highly associated with DU and GC. In this way, and without being able to eradicate the infectious burden, the humoral immune system can constrain the mucosal inflammatory stress of the H. pylori infection, resulting in a more balanced and “commensal” level of bacteria, and importantly, with a resultant lowered risk for severe gastric disease. But how about the GI-protective IgA? Perhaps surprisingly, there is no increased prevalence of severe gastric disease/cancer in IgA-deficient individuals (which is a common affliction affecting about 1/800 individuals), and this argues that IgA and/or secretory IgA are not major intestinal immune protectors against chronic inflammatory H. pylori infection 34,35. Humoral bbAb mediated protection is further illustrated by the elevated IT50 at older age (Figure 1F), which might be a compensation for the reduced T-cell reactivity seen in elderly people 36,37. In addition, we show that individuals with low IT50 are at higher risk for DU, which suggests that even though the etiology of DU is the H. pylori infection, the cause of DU is a consequence of suboptimal humoral responses, i.e., DU is an immunodeficiency disease with insufficiently induced levels of protective bbAbs. The risk for DU is also increased in this group because they often harbor H. pylori with greater binding strength with consequential unbalanced and augmented inflammation pressure. It is noteworthy that the higher binding affinities among DU strains might be a consequence of the low and hence less protective IT50 levels among individuals who develop DU disease.
We have previously shown that Leb-binding at buffered pH provides for tight adherence to the gastric epithelium 14, which allows for access to essential nutrients and iron 38,39. The many decades of unsuccessful development of H. pylori vaccines based on conventional antigen compositions can be better understood by our new results on how H. pylori makes use of the pH gradient in the mucus layer for a daily “acid wash cleaning” in order to rid itself of antibodies and acid-sensitive complement factors. After which, H. pylori can return, fully “immuno-recycled”, to its protected niche in the epithelial lining, as illustrated in Video S1 (https://play.umu.se/media/t/0_bf1lh9gt). Our results for the protective bbAbs suggest translational applications for non-antibiotic treatment regimens based on therapeutic bbAbs such as ABbA and predictive diagnostics such as IT50 for individuals who are at risk for severe gastric disease.
STAR * METHODS
RESOURCE AVAILABILITY
Lead contact
Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Thomas Borén (thomas.boren@umu.se).
Materials availability
Strains and plasmids generated in this study are available upon request to the lead contact, Thomas Borén (thomas.boren@umu.se).
Data and code availability
Genome sequencing data for H. pylori CCUG 17875 and its plasmid are available from GenBank with the accession number CP090367 and CP0903678, respectively. The ABbA-BabA co-crystal coordinates are available by the Accession code: PDB ID 7ZQT. All other data are available in the main text or the supplemental information. Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.
EXPERIMENTAL MODEL AND SUBJECT DETAILS
The Supplementary Materials and Methods includes the following topics:
H. pylori Strains and Media
Blood Group Antigens and Conjugates
Serum Samples: Human sera collection, poly clonal rabbit sera, mice sera of infected and vaccinated FVB/n mice, and histological tests of Leb mouse gastric mucosa.
Monoclonal ABbA-IgG
In situ binding by H. pylori In situ binding of H. pylori to human gastric mucosa histo-tissue sections, and inhibition of in situ H. pylori binding by human sera and by ABbA-IgG.
Radio-immuno Analysis (RIA): BabA binding properties, inhibition titers (IT50s), ABbA-Ig inhibition capacity (IC50), and analysis of 125I-ABbA and Leb competitive RIA.
SDS-PAGE and Immunoblot detection.
Isolation, purification, and expression of ABbA-IgG: cDNA synthesis and PCR of human variable regions, ScFv-library construction, selection of BabA-binding scFvs by phage display, and construction of a human IgG; ABbA-IgG binding properties by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) and surface plasmon resonance (SPR); immuno-EM and detection of BabA by ABbA; construction of a BabA phage library; and selection of ABbA-IgG-binding BabA fragments.
The BabA protein co-crystallized with ABbA-IgG (Fab).
Genetic complementation by shuttle vector-expressed recombinant BabA and DSS mutants in H. pylori.
Amplification and analysis of BabA sequences.
Amino acid positions in the BabA CBD that modulate ABbA binding strength.
Acid sensitivity in Leb-binding and ABbA binding.
1. H. pylori strains
Laboratory strains:
H. pylori 17875/Leb is an isolated single clone of H. pylori CCUG17875, and it binds to ABO/Leb antigens with high Leb-binding affinity, but not to sialylated antigens 41. The 17875babA1A2 strain is a null mutant with the two babA1 and babA2 genes deleted from H. pylori CCUG17875, referred to as the babA1A2-mutant 10. The H. pylori CCUG17874 binds sialylated antigens but not the ABO/Leb antigens 42.
Clinical H. pylori isolates:
The H. pylori isolates from Sweden (29 strains), Germany (4 strains), Spain (13 strains), Japan (13 strains), Alaska (11 strains), and Peru (38 strains) have been previously described 11. The 13 Indian strains
The H. pylori isolates Sw44, Sw103, S864, J533, A714, A723, P330, P436 have been previously described 11, and the 13 Indian strains including isolate I9 and the J166 strain have been described in 14 and 43, respectively. The 32 (Table S2B) Mexican isolates from the UMAE Pediatria IMSS in Mexico City were isolated from patients with GA (n = 13) or DU (n = 13). The H. pylori Ch1 strain was isolated from a Chinese individual with a family history of gastric cancer. H. pylori USU101 and a Rhesus macaque passage clone USU101∆babA with a natural babA deletion were as described 14,44.
2. H. pylori culture media
Cultures were performed with blood agar plates, and H. pylori cultures were grown in a mixed-gas incubator under micro-aerophilic conditions as described 42.
3. Blood group antigen conjugates.
Two different types of fucosylated blood group antigen conjugates were used, namely 1) semi-synthetic Leb and ALeb-glycoconjugates (Leb-HSA and ALeb-HSA, respectively) with natural purified oligosaccharides covalently linked to human serum albumin (Isosep AB, Tullinge, Sweden) or 2) oligosaccharides synthesized by S. Oscarson (co-author) and conjugated to HSA. The conjugates were used for the radio-immuno assay (RIA) binding experiments.
4. Serum samples
4.1. Human subjects and sera
Procedures involving human subjects were approved by the following boards. The series of sera from the Karolinska Institutet Hospital was approved by ethical permits Dnr 185/93 and 2013/1255. The Kalixanda study was approved by the Umeå University ethics committee permit Dno. 98–99, §156/98. The series of adult sera from Sumy, Ukraine, was approved by the local ethics committee of Sumy Council “Sumy Regional Clinical Hospital” permit protocol 2/5, 15 February 2019. The series of pediatric sera from Sumy, Ukraine, were approved by ethical permit protocol №11/1 of the Institutional Bioethics Committee of the Medical Institute of Sumy State University from 26 November, 2020. The series of serum samples from Baylor College of Medicine were made anonymous and approved by the IRB at Baylor College of Medicine. The series of serum samples from Mexico City was approved by ethical permit IMSS, Mexico; 2008-785-001. Informed consent was obtained from all human participants or legal guardians of participating minors.
4.1.1. Karolinska Institute (KI) series.
Serum samples from volunteer donors were tested by H. pylori ELISA 34, and 36/72 (50%) were positive (Table S1A). Additional follow-up serum samples were collected four times for individual 16 and three times for individual patient 36 over ~30 years (Figure 1D).
4.1.2. Kalixanda series.
A total of 322 sera samples were obtained from volunteers, and ELISA analysis demonstrated that all sera were H. pylori positive with individual signal intensity, and 74% of the samples were CagA positive 20. Of these, 161 samples were collected from men with a median age of 59 years and 161 samples were collected from women with a median age of 61 years (Table S1B).
4.1.3. Ukraine, adult series.
A total of 104 sera samples were collected from patients with gastric diseases at Sumy Regional Clinical Hospital. The sera were tested by ELISA, and 79 of them (76%) were defined as H. pylori positive. The 20 men and 59 women were from 20 to 79 years of age (Table S1C).
4.1.4. Ukraine, children series.
A total of 135 serum samples were obtained from a children’s sera collection at Regional Children’s Hospital and St. Zinaida City Children’s Hospital in Sumy, Ukraine. The patients were tested by ELISA, and 36 of them (27%) were defined as H. pylori positive. The 14 girls and 22 boys (39% girls and 61% boys) were from 3 to 17 years of age (Table S1F).
The Ukrainian sera samples were analyzed with an anti-H. pylori ELISA (IgG) test system (EUROIMMUN, a PerkinElmer company, Medizinische Labordiagnostika AG, Lübeck, Germany).
4.1.5. Mexico series 1.
A total of 200 ELISA-positive serum samples from patients with gastric disease were obtained from Mexico UMAE Pediatria. Of these, 200 H. pylori ELISA-positive serum samples were tested. The patient group included 82 men from 30 to 81 years of age and 118 women from 30 to 86 years of age (Table S1E).
4.1.6. Mexico series 2.
A total of 79 serum samples from patients with NAG or DU diagnosis were obtained from Mexico UMAE Pediatria from patients with defined gastric disease. Among these, 35 patients had NAG, including 19 men (33–82 years of age) and 16 women (30–79 years of age), and 44 patients had DU, including 26 men (38–86 years of age) and 18 women (27–79 years of age) (Table S3).
4.1.7. The US series.
A total of 141 H. pylori ELISA-positive serum samples from patients with gastric disease at Baylor College of Medicine (Houston, TX, USA) were subjected to further investigation (Table S1D).
Sera and antibodies
4.2. Sera from rabbits immunized with synthesized peptides (Figure 5).
For epitope mapping, rabbit sera were raised against 7 peptides located in the BabA CBD (Figure S5B). Peptides were synthesized, and Cys residues were added to peptides 1–6 for keyhole limpet hemocyanin conjugation and used in four consecutive subcutaneous immunizations (Agrisera AB, Vännäs, Sweden). Each rabbit serum sample was quality tested and shown by immunoblot to bind BabA.
4.3. Polyclonal rabbit sera for immunoblot detection of BabA and BabB (Figure S3G and Figure S4Eiii and iv and Figure S5F).
BabA and BabB proteins were detected with the polyclonal anti-BabA VITE antibody and VIRA antibody, respectively, diluted 1:6000 and secondary HRP-goat antibody diluted 1:1000 (DakoCytomation, Denmark A/S) according to 14.
4.4. Monoclonal ABbA-IgG (Figure 4, 5, and 6).
Monoclonal ABbA-IgG was initially expressed and produced in Schneider cells 45 and later by Absolute Antibody Ltd., Oxford Center for Innovation (New Road, Oxford, 0X1 1BY, United Kingdom) using transient expression in HEK293 cells.
5. Blocking buffer and blocking solution.
“Blocking buffer” contained 1% BSA (SCA Cohn fraction V, SWAB, Sweden) in PBS-Tween = PBS-T (PBS, pH 7.4, 0.05% (v/v) Tween-20). For preparation of “SIA-buffer”, 1% BSA was oxidized by 10 mM sodium periodate in 0.1 M acetic acid buffer (pH 4.5) for 1 h. The reaction was stopped by incubating for 30 min in 20 mM sodium bisulfite and 0.125 M potassium phosphate. The solution was then dialyzed against deionized water overnight at 4°C. For SIA blocking buffer, the periodate-treated BSA was mixed with PBS-T. For SIA blocking solution, the periodate-treated BSA was mixed with 150 mM sodium chloride/0.05% Tween. The two different preparations were then filtered through 0.22 µm filters, aliquoted, and kept at –20°C.
THE FOLLOWING METHODS ARE PRESENTED IN EXPERIMENTAL ORDER AND ACCORDING TO THE SECTION HEADINGS
1. In situ binding of H. pylori to human gastric mucosa histo-tissue sections (Figure S1A).
Bacteria were labelled with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), and in vitro bacterial adhesion was tested as described 42. Slides were mounted with DAKO fluorescent mounting media (DAKO North America, Inc., CA, USA) and imaged with a Zeiss Axio Imager Z1 microscope (Carl Zeiss AB, Stockholm, Sweden) or the Leica Thunder microscopes. FITC-labelled H. pylori were digitalized from at least 3 identical fields of view from serial sections to quantify bacterial attachment. All images were evaluated by ImageJ. Briefly, micro-picts were subjected to the threshold in order to separate objects of interest from the background and quantified by “Analyze particles”. Graphs and curves were created using GraphPad Prism 9 (San Diego, USA)
1.1. Inhibition of in situ H. pylori binding by human sera (Figure 1A and S1B).
Inhibition tests were performed with the in situ binding methods as described above with the following modifications. FITC-labeled bacteria were first mixed with sera in SIA buffer at the dilutions shown in the figures on a slowly rocking table for 1 h at room temperature and then processed as described 42. The attachment of bacterial cells was digitalized and quantified as described above.
1.2. Inhibition of in situ H. pylori binding by ABbA-IgG (Figure 4B).
Inhibition of bacterial attachment by ABbA-IgG was carried out as described above with slight modifications. FITC-labeled bacteria were first mixed with different dilutions of ABbA-IgG diluted in SIA buffer, incubated on a rocking table for 2 h at room temperature, and then processed, digitalized, and quantified as described above.
2. Tests of inhibition titer (IT50) and of ABbA IC50 and binding affinity by RIA and ITC and SPR.
2.1. Labeling of Leb-HSA and ALeb-HSA by 125I.
The Leb-HSA and ALeb-HSA conjugates (IsoSep AB, Tullinge, Sweden) were I125-labeled (I125-Leb-conjugate) using the chloramine-T method 42.
2.2. Labeling of human sera IgG and ABbA-IgG by 125I.
Labeling of human sera IgG and monoclonal ABbA-IgG was done according to the chloramine-T method with slight modifications. Briefly, 1 µl of 125I (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) was added to 2 µg of sera/ABbA-IgG in 50 µl K2HPO4/KH2PO4 buffer (pH 7.4). Labeling was started by the addition of 20 μL 0.6 mg/mL chloramine-T and stopped by the addition of 100 μL 1 mg/mL Na2S2O5 and 200 μL KI (9.6 mg/mL) after 20 and 40 seconds, respectively. 125I-labeled sera/ABbA-IgG was purified with a PD-10 column (GE Healthcare, Sweden), and the fractions with the highest radioactivity were pooled.
The stability of the labeled IgGs was determined by radioimmune binding assay of bacterial suspensions with the target proteins present in excess. Typical binding for the radiolabeled monoclonal IgG was greater than 90% towards the 17875/Leb strain. The procedure was repeated on multiple days post labeling in order to monitor the rate of degradation due to the harsh conditions of the labeling protocol. All experiments with radiolabeled IgGs were performed within 5 days after labeling.
2.3. Analysis of BabA binding properties by RIA.
125I-labeled Leb-HSA conjugate (“hot conjugate”) or I125-labeled Leb-HSA diluted with unlabeled conjugate (“cocktail”) 42 was mixed with 1 mL of bacterial suspension (OD600 = 0.1) in blocking buffer. Following incubation, the bacteria were pelleted by centrifugation at 13,000 × g, and the 125I in the pellet and in the supernatant was measured using the 2470 Wizard2 Automatic Gamma counter (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) giving a measure of binding activity (% binding).
2.4. Analysis of sera inhibition titers (IT50) by RIA.
Serum samples from 960 H. pylori-infected patients were tested for their ability to inhibit the binding of radiolabeled Leb-HSA conjugate (I125-Leb-conjugate) to selected H. pylori strains. In order to compare IT50s fairly between strains with varying maximum binding properties, all strains were calibrated in a pilot experiment to find the dilution corresponding to 10% I125-Leb-conjugate binding. To ensure consistency of bacterial numbers and to aid pellet recovery, strains were diluted with H. pylori 17874, which does not bind Leb. For example, 17875/Leb at an OD600nm = 1.0 (2.5 × 109 CFU/mL) was diluted 1:900 with H. pylori 17874 to reach 10% binding. Serial dilutions of the serum were made in blocking buffer, and 50 µL of I125-Leb conjugate (0.01 ng/µL) was added to a final volume of 500 µL. After addition of 500 µL of the 17875/Leb and 17874 mixture, the tubes were rotated for 17 h at room temperature. Samples were centrifuged (13,000 x g for 13 min), and the I125-Leb-conjugates in the pellet and supernatant were measured to ascertain the bound and free conjugate amounts, respectively. The relative titer of the tested serum was defined as the dilution titer sufficient to reduce Leb binding to half the maximum value as determined by binding of the Leb conjugate in the absence of serum (IT50).
A micro-scale assay was established in a conical polystyrene 96-well plate (Thermo Scientific, Germany) that allowed the determination of the inhibitory titer with only 3 µL of serum. For each serum sample, a 1:3 serial dilution series (starting from 1:33) was established in 6 wells of the 96-well plate with a final volume of 60 µL. Then, 60 µL was added to each well of a mixture consisting of 1 ng of I125-Leb conjugate and a suspension of H. pylori 17875/Leb (OD600 = 0.1) as well as H. pylori 17874 (OD600 = 0.1). All samples were diluted in blocking buffer. The 96-well plate was rotated for 17 h at room temperature and then centrifuged (4,000 x g for 5 min), and the I125-Leb-conjugate was measured separately in the pellet and supernatant to determine the IT50.
This micro-scale assay was additionally adapted to be performed like the original assay in 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes. The procedure was identical to the 96-well assay with the difference that the centrifugation conditions post incubation were done according to the original assay at 13,000 x g for 13 min. IT50s were calculated identically as for the previous assay variations.
2.5. Analysis of ABbA-IgG inhibition capacity (IC50).
The ABbA-IgG and ABbA-scFv inhibition capacities were measured as described in Section 2.2.4 with slight modification. The known concentration of ABbA-IgG was used to calculate the IC50, i.e., the concentration of antibody that provides 50% inhibition of H. pylori binding.
2.6. Analysis of ABbA-IgG binding properties by ITC and SPR (Figures S4E and S4F).
ITC was performed on an Auto-ITC200 from Malvern Panalytical (Malvern, UK). Recombinant BabA from H. pylori 17875/Leb was stabilized by adding hexa-lysine and myc-tag to the BabA protein C-terminus as described previously 25. Experiments were performed at 25°C in PBS with 10 µM of BabA and injection of 50 µM ABbA-IgG. The titrations were repeated three times with high feedback and a filter period of 5 s. For each experiment, 19 automated injections of 2 μL each were performed (duration 0.8 s) with 300 s intervals between each injection with a stirring speed of 1000 rpm. Calorimetric data were plotted and fitted using a single-site binding model with MicroCal PEAQ-ITC Analysis from Malvern Panalytical (Malvern, UK).
SPR experiments were performed on a Biacore 3000 system (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden). ABbA-IgG was immobilized on a CM5 chip at around 50 RU levels by standard amine coupling at pH 5. Recombinant BabA from H. pylori 17875/Leb was injected for 2 min over the surface at concentrations of 66 nM or 40 nM at two- or three-fold dilutions in PBS + 0.005% Tween-20 at 25°C. Regeneration was done by injection of 10 mM glycine (pH 1.7) for 18 s. Dissociation and rate constants were determined by global fitting with Scrubber2 software (Biological Software, Australia). The experiment was repeated three times and presented as the average value.
2.7. Analysis of 125I-ABbA and Leb competitive RIA (Figures 5Bii and 5Biii).
For competitive RIA assays, the ABbA-IgG was labeled as described in Section 2.2.2. To measure whether ABbA-IgG could compete with the anti-peptide rabbit serum for BabA-binding, I125-ABbA-IgG1 (0.13 nM, ~20.000 cpm) was incubated with titrated amounts of rabbit serum (1:100 to 1:1600) with constant amounts of H. pylori 17875/Leb (OD600nm = 0.002) and H. pylori 17874 (OD600nm = 0.1). After overnight incubation at 4°C, the bacteria were pelleted, and γ-emission was measured in the supernatant (free fraction of I125-ABbA-IgG1) and pellet (bound fraction). For measuring Leb competition, 1 μg/mL radiolabeled Leb (~25.000 cpm) was added instead of I125-ABbA-IgG1. Dilutions were made in blocking buffer (1% BSA in T-PBS).
2.8. Analysis of ABbA-IgG inhibition capacity corresponding to IT50 (Fig 4D).
Given that the antibodies in the patient serums contain antibodies with a binding efficiency on the same level as the ABbA IgG mAb, we devised the term “ABbA IgG-like antibodies” in order to assign more quantitative values and to more understandably talk about the relationship between IT50 (unknown concentration) and IC50 (known concentration). For example, “What level/concentration of “ABbA like IgG” would a patient have if their IT50 corresponds to 100?” Given that the IC50 of ABbA is 12.86 ng/mL, and that we know that this concentration corresponds to the same level of binding as the IT50, we calculate in reverse to find the stock concentration of “ABbA like IgGs” in the serum:
This is the likely concentration of “ABbA like IgGs” in a patient’s serum that has an IT50 of 100.
2.9. Analysis of odds ratios (ORs) by sliding window calculation (Figures 3C and S3E)
We started out by creating a database containing 4 entries derived from the milder symptoms of the infection (gastritis, G) and the more severe symptom of the infection (duodenal ulcer, DU). Both of these are further divided into High or Low depending on the selected cut-off value for the OR calculations.
The measurable parameter is the patient serum IT50 level, i.e. “How many times we can dilute the serum and inhibit 50% of the binding”. Depending on the test-strain, the IT50 for a given serum will change depending on strain’s Leb-binding affinity (see IT50 method). Because there is currently no definition of what a High or Low IT50 is in terms of antibodies towards the H. pylori binding adhesin, we want nature to tell us “is there a numerical value of these IT50 for any given strain that indicates whether an individual patient is at risk for more severe disease progression?”
We had 60 patients evenly/randomly divided between the DU and G diagnoses. These patients had serum IT50s tested against multiple strains of different affinities for the Leb conjugate. For example, with the CCUG 17875/Leb strain (high affinity) we had IT50s ranging from 1 (serums that inhibits, but does not reach the 50% binding mark) and up to a few hundred. The mean and median IT50 was around 75. So, we started testing the cut-off values at 2, and then slid our way up towards 150.
For every step we created an entry in the database. The first step was the temporarily defined “cut-off” (in this first entry it is equal to 2). The script then counted all observations of patient with the G diagnoses that had an IT50 below the current cut-off into the “Low G group”, everything with a G diagnose and above the cut-off was sorted into the “High G group”, and the same procedure was applied for the sera samples of DU diagnoses. For each tested cut-off we were then left with 4 values that told us how the patients were distributed among the 4 groups, and a row-name was created corresponding to the cut-off it was calculated for.
The slider increased 1 more step and it iterated itself and created another entry for the cut-off equal to 3, and then continued to do so until we ran across all of the different cut-offs we needed assessed by that particular test-strain. Because a sample could only move from the Low group to the High group, once a sample had moved into the High group it could never end up in another group again. So, after a certain time there were very few samples left that could “move” into another group. This means that we always reached a point where there was no point in checking above a certain value as things would change with very low frequencies.
The final Table was then comprised of rows containing the cut-off value and the patient distribution among the 4 groups.
The OR was then calculated by dividing the ratio of “low DU/high DU” by the ratio of “low G/High G”. If the OR was equal to or close 1 this meant that there was no difference between the 2 different diagnoses and the patients’; IT50s. If the OR was greater than 1 this indicated that a high IT50 was connected to a milder diagnosis (G), and if the OR was less than 1 this indicated that a high IT50 was connected to a worse diagnosis (DU).
For each of the different cut-offs, we ran a Fisher’s exact t-test to test for significance, because low and high ORs did not necessarily correlate with significant observations.
The ORs across the whole tested range for each strain was illustrated in a window containing all the ORs and how the OR changed as the cut-off level increased. On the second (right) Y-axis, the corresponding significance from the ORs was plotted. The classical 0.05 and 0.01 p-values were plotted as horizontal lines to visually show where (if anywhere) the ORs were presented as significant.
At these points we suggest that these cut-offs potentially could be used to indicate whether a patient should seek eradication (or future vaccine) treatment of their H. pylori infection or whether their own immune system will most likely be able to keep the infection in balance i.e., without disease progression.
3. SDS-PAGE and immunoblot detection of denatured or semi-native BabA.
SDS-PAGE was performed with 7.5% or 10% Mini-PROTEAN TGX Gels (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Bacterial extracts оr the BabA protein solution were applied in Laemmli buffer under non-reducing, semi-native conditions and mild heating at 37°C for 30 min or under denaturing conditions (5% β-mercaptoethanol or 10 mM DTT and 10 min boiling) prior to loading onto the gels. For immunoblots, proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA) and blocked with 5% skim milk. Detection of native/recombinant BabA with human sera or ABbA-scFv on immunoblots was as described above, with the human sera being diluted 1:1000 and incubated overnight at 4°C. Secondary antibody HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) was diluted 1:1000 or ECL sheep anti-human HRP-conjugated (GE-Healthcare, USA) was diluted 1:5000 and incubated with the membrane for 1 h at room temperature. Bound ABbA-scFv was detected by incubation of the membrane with biotinylated murine anti-myc mAb 9E10 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) followed by a streptavidin-HRP conjugate. Signals were developed with ECL chemiluminescence (SuperSignal West Pico, Thermo Scientific/Pierce, IL, Rockford, USA). For visualization of the signal, the Bio-Rad ChemiDoc™ Touch Imaging System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc) was used.
4. Purification of human IgG.
A volume of 200 µl of human serum (total protein concentration 5 mg/mL) was diluted with 2.8 mL of binding buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.0). The sample was applied by a syringe onto a 1 mL HiTrap Protein G High Performance column (Cytiva, USA). The flow-through fraction with a total protein concentration of 4 mg/mL was saved for RIA analysis. The column was washed with 10 column volumes of binding buffer, and IgG was eluted as a 1 mL fraction with 10 mM glycine (pH 2.7) into tubes containing 100 µl 1M Tris (pH 9.0) and ≈2.5 mg/mL of protein. The protein concentration in the plasma and the flow through was determined by Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purified IgG fraction concentrations were determined by absorbance at 280 nm with a Nanodrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, In., USA). Human IgG was identified by immunoblotting with sheep anti-human HRP-conjugated antibody (GE Healthcare, USA) diluted 1:5000. The human IgG was detected as the 55 kDa heavy chain (HC) and the 30 kDa light chain (LC).
5. Isolation, purification, and expression of ABbA-IgG (Figure 4).
5.1. cDNA synthesis and PCR of human variable regions.
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 10 mL of patient blood were isolated on a Ficoll gradient, and total RNA was extracted using standard protocols (RNeasy-Mini, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). First-strand cDNA was synthesized with an oligo-d(T) primer (Amersham Biosciences, Buckingham, UK), and human variable immunoglobulin genes were amplified via PCR in 50 µL reactions containing 1 µL cDNA, 200 µM dNTPs, 5 µL 10x reaction buffer, 1 U polymerase (BD-Advantage2, BD Biosciences Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA), and the appropriate family-based sense and antisense primers (500 nM) for 36 cycles (15 s denaturation at 94°C, 30 s annealing at 65°C, and 30 s extension at 72°C). The sense and antisense primers were described elsewhere 46–48. For VL-chain amplification, the sense primers were extended at the 5′ end by the sequence TAC AGGATCCACGCGTA in order to introduce an MluI restriction site, and the antisense primer was extended with TGACAAGCTTGCGGCCGCG for introduction of a Not I site. For VH-chain amplification, the sense primers were extended with GAATAGGCCATGGCG (Nco I site) and the antisense primer with CAGTCAAGCTT (Hind III site). The antisense primers annealed at the 5’ ends of the CH1 and constant Kappa regions, respectively. All amplifications were performed independently for each of the family-specific sense primers. The PCR products were pooled, gel-extracted (QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit, Qiagen), and digested with Mlu I and Not I (New England Biolabs, USA) for cloning of VL chains and with Nco I and Hind III for cloning of VH chains. After digestion, the fragments were gel purified again and stored at –20°C.
5.2. ScFv library construction.
The phagemid vector pSEX81-phOx 24 was digested with Mlu I and Not I and separated from the phOx scFv cassette by extraction in a 0.7% agarose gel. One hundred nanograms of the digested vector were ligated with 10 ng of the purified VL chains in a final volume of 40 µL with 1 U ligase (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) at 16°C overnight. Plasmid DNA was ethanol precipitated and electroporated into the E. coli strain XL1-Blue (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), and the bacteria were grown for 1 h in 1 mL SOC media (LB plus 0.1 M glucose) for recovery. The bacteria were subsequently plated on SOBGAT plates (0.1 M glucose, 100 µg/mL ampicillin, 12.5 µg/mL tetracycline) and incubated overnight at 37°C. Colonies were scraped off, and vector DNA containing the VL chain repertoire was isolated using anion exchange chromatography columns (Macherey & Nagel, Germany). For cloning of the VH chains, vector DNA was digested with Hind III and Nco I (New England Biolabs), ligated with the appropriately digested VH-encoding genes, transformed into XL1-Blue cells, and grown as described above. Independent colonies were scraped off and stored in 25% glycerol at –80°C as the final scFv library.
5.3. Selection of BabA-binding scFvs by phage display (fig S4A).
Phage scFvs were retrieved from the libraries essentially as described 49 using helper phage M13KO7 (New England Biolabs, USA) for packaging. Panning was performed in Maxisorb Immunotubes (Nunc, Wiebaden, Germany) coated overnight with 5 µg of purified BabA (according to 14) at 4°C and blocked with PBS containing 2% (w/v) low-fat dried skimmed milk (2% M-PBS). Tubes coated with BSA were used as negative controls. For selection, phage-scFvs (1012 CFUs) were blocked by the addition of an equal volume of PBS containing 4% milk (w/v) to the tubes and incubation with constant rolling for 2 h at room temperature. The solution was subsequently discarded, and the tubes were washed 10 times with PBS in the first panning round. With subsequent panning rounds, washing stringency was increased by vortexing 10 times with 0.1% Tween 20 in PBS. Bound phages were eluted by addition of 1 mL 0.1 M triethylamine (pH 11.5) for 5 min with gentle agitation and neutralization with 0.5 mL 1 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.4). The neutralized mixture was used to infect 20 mL of exponential-phase E. coli XL1-Blue grown in 2YT media (12.5 µg/mL tetracycline) at 37°C. After incubation for 15 min at 37°C without shaking, the bacteria were shaken for 45 min, plated on SOBGAT plates, and incubated overnight at 37°C. The bacteria were harvested and stored in aliquots at –80°C, representing a phagemid-packaged scFv-library. For the subsequent panning round, phages were produced by inoculation of 10 mL LBGAT media with an aliquot of the library in order to reach an OD600nm = 0.4. The titers of eluted phage containing either helper phage or the phagemid genomes were determined by CFU titration on LB plus kanamycin (70 µg/mL) or LB plus ampicillin (100 µg/mL) plates, respectively, essentially as described50. The enrichment of specific binders during the selection procedure was determined by dividing the number of phage that were eluted from BabA-coated immunotubes by the number of phage that were eluted from BSA-coated immunotubes (the enrichment factor was 55 in the second and 2381 in the third panning rounds).
5.4. ELISA screening with scFv-gIII fusion proteins.
BabA-specific scFvs were screened by taking advantage of the pIII protein encoded in the phagemid vector essentially as described 51. Briefly, production of scFv-gIII fusion proteins in logarithmically growing bacteria was induced with 100 µM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) for 16 h at 30°C. Bacteria were centrifuged and the pellet was incubated in Spheroblast solution (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, with 20% sucrose and 1 mM EDTA) for 20 min on ice, followed by centrifugation at 30,000 x g for 45 min at 4°C. The supernatant, representing the periplasmic extract, was diluted with an equal volume of 4% M-PBS and used for ELISA. Wells (Nunc Microtitre plates, Wiesbaden, Germany) were coated with 200 ng of BabA overnight at 4°C in 50 mM Na2CO3-NaHCO3 (pH 9.6). After blocking with 2% M-PBS, the periplasmic extract was added and incubated for 4 h at room temperature. Antigen-bound scFv-pIII fusion protein was detected by incubation with a mouse mAb specific for pIII (MobiTec, Göttingen, Germany 24 for 1 h at room temperature followed by an HRP-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse antibody (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) for 1 h at room temperature. Colorization was performed with 0.42 mM 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (Merck-Germany) in substrate buffer (83 mM sodium acetate, 17 mM citric acid (pH 4.9), and 0.004% H2O2). After all incubation steps, the ELISA wells were washed three times with blocking buffer. As a negative binding control, a 2-phenyloxazolone (anti-phOx) scFv was expressed in the same phagemid vector and analyzed using ELISA-coated, phOx-conjugated BSA.
5.5. Subcloning into the prokaryotic expression vector pOPE101 (Figure S4).
The entire scFv expression cassette from the phagemid vector pSEX81 was subcloned into the prokaryotic expression vector pOPE101 (Genbank #Y14585) via the Nco I and Not I sites. The C-terminal myc and (His)6 tags allowed detection and IMAC purification, respectively. Purification from the periplasmic space was performed as described 24.
5.5. Production of a complete human antibody (Figures 4 and S4).
Variable regions were cloned into the insect cell expression vector pMThIgG1-V carrying the constant regions of the human IgG1 heavy chain and human kappa chain 24. PCR was performed using the VL chain primer pair VL5′SfiI (TTA CTC GCC TGG CCG TCG TGG CCT TTG TTG GCC TCT CGC TGG GCG ACA TCC AGA TGA CCC AGT C) and VL3′BsiWI (AGC GTA CGT ACG TTT GAT TTC CAC CTT GGT CC) and the VH chain primer pair VH5′SnaBI (GAT GTC TAC GTA GGC CTC TCG CTG GGC CAG GTG CAG CTG GTC CAG TC) and VH3′ApaI (ACC GAT GGG CCC TTG GTG GAG GCG GAG GAG ACG GCG ACC AGG G). PCR was performed with 100 ng of the phagemid vector as the template, 25 pmol each of the VL and VH primer pair, 2 µM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs, and 10 U of Taq polymerase (Promega). After an initial denaturation at 94°C for 2 min, 32 cycles were run with 15 s at 94°C, 30 s at 62°C, and 30 s at 72°C, with a final elongation step of 5 min at 72°C. PCR products were purified with the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen) and digested with the appropriate restriction enzymes prior to cloning. A stable antibody-secreting S2 Schneider cell line (Invitrogen) was established as previously described 45, and antibodies in the media were purified and enriched using protein G columns (GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA). The purity and functionality of the purified antibodies were analyzed by Coomassie staining and ELISA, respectively.
5.7. Immunoelectron microscopy and detection of BabA by ABbA (Figure S4G).
Bacterial cells from H. pylori 17875/Leb and the 17875babA1A2 mutant were grown and adjusted in PBS to an OD600 of 1. An aliquot of each strain was resuspended in 2% BSA in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer for 15 min, centrifuged, and resuspended with ABbA-IgG or an irrelevant anti-HCV antibody of the same human IgG1-isotype diluted 1:1 in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate plus 0.1% BSA and incubated for 60 min. After incubation, the bacteria were washed twice in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate plus 0.1% BSA and resuspended in the same buffer containing protein A conjugated to 10-nm gold particles (GE Healthcare) and incubated for 45 min. The incubation was terminated by adding glutaraldehyde to a final concentration of 1%, and the samples were fixed overnight at 4°C. Bacteria were subsequently pelleted and small aliquots were resuspended in distilled water. Small drops (3 µL) were placed on formvar-coated grids and allowed to attach for 5 min. Excess water was removed with filter paper and then the grids were air-dried for 5 min and then examined on a Tecnai 10 electron microscope (Fei, Eindhoven, Netherlands) at 100 kV, and the images were recorded on photographic film.
5.8. Construction of a random BabA shotgun gene-fragment library (Figure 5A).
The phagemid vector pSEX81(phOx) was prepared for blunt end ligation by digestion with PvuII and EcoRV followed by agarose gel purification. The purified vector was treated with shrimp alkaline phosphatase (NEB, USA) to prevent self-ligation. The full-length babA gene from H. pylori strain 17875/Leb was excised from a midi-plasmid preparation by restriction enzyme digestion and purified on an 0.8% agarose gel. The purified babA gene was sonicated with a Covaris S sonicator to obtain DNA fragments with a size of 400, 800, or 1500 bp. DNA fragments were polished by treatment with T4 DNA polymerase, and 5′-ends were subsequently phosphorylated by T4 polynucleotide kinase (Next End Repair Module, NEB, USA). Fragments were purified on a Qiagen column (PCR purification kit) and ligated overnight with 200 ng of the prepared phagemid pSEX81 plasmid. Electroporation and library preparation were performed as described in 49–51, and aliquots were stored at –80°C.
5.9. Selection of ABbA-IgG-binding BabA fragments by phage display (Figure 5A).
Phage display selection was performed essentially as described in 49–51, except that Hyperphage M13KO7∆pIII was used for phage packaging (Progen-Heidelberg, Germany) and immunotubes were coated with 10 μg ABbA-IgG or HSA-Leb.
6. The BabA protein co-crystallized with ABbA-IgG (Fab) (Figure 5C and Figure S5E, Table S5).
To generate the BabA-ABbA complex, purified BabAAD (residues 25 to 460 of mature BabA) and ABbA-Fab were mixed at a 1:1 stoichiometric ratio. Crystal formation of the BabA-ABbA complex was enhanced by use of nanobody Nb-ER19 as described in 13,52. Nb-ER19 is a camelid VHH single domain antibody that binds the 3+4 alpha domain of BabAAD, stabilizes BabAAD, and facilitates its crystallization. Binding of Nb-ER19 is distant from the CBD and does not interfere with the binding of glycan receptors or of ABbA to BabA. BabAAD and Nb-ER19 were produced and purified as described previously 13. The ABbA-Fab was generated using the Pierce Fab Preparation Kit according to the manufacturer′s instructions (ThermoScientific, cat#44985). The BabA-ABbA-Nb-ER19 complex (40 mg/mL in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and 10 mM NaCl) was crystallized in 15% PEG6000, 0.1 M NaAc (pH 5.5), and 0.2 M CaCl2 by sitting drop vapor diffusion. For data collection, crystals were cryo-protected by brief transfer into the crystallization buffer supplemented with 15% glycerol, after which crystals were loop mounted and flash cooled in liquid nitrogen. X-ray diffraction data were collected from a single crystal at beamline ID29 of the ESRF (date 31/08/2014) at a wavelength of 1.072 Å to a final resolution of 2.7 Å. Diffraction data were integrated and scaled using XDS and XSCALE 53, and the structure was solved by molecular replacement using Phaser 54 and BabAAD-Nb-ER19 (PDB: 5F7W) and an unrelated FAB (PDB: 1S5H) as search models. The final model was obtained after iterative cycles of manual building using Coot 55 and maximum likelihood refinement against the X-ray data using Phenix Refine 56 resulting in a model that contained two copies of the BabAAD-ABbA-Nb-ER19 complex per asymmetric unit, with an R and free R-factor of 22.9% and 28.3%, respectively, and 98.9% of the residues were in allowed regions of the Ramachandran plot. The BabA crystal structure was displayed with DNASTAR/Lasergene Protean 3D Software.
Data collection | BabAAD-Nb19-ABBA |
---|---|
Space group | P 1 21 1 |
Cell dimensions | |
a, b, c (Å) | 99.7, 68.4, 176.6 |
α, β, γ (°) | 90.0, 104.4, 90.0 |
Resolution (Å) | 39.45–2.70 (2.77–2.70)* |
R meas | 6.0 (88.4)* |
I/σI | 15.1 (2.1)* |
CC1/2 | 99.9 (86.4)* |
Completeness (%) | 99.2 (99.3)* |
Redundancy | 4.3 (4.5)* |
Refinement | |
Resolution (Å) | 39.5–2.7 |
No. reflections | 63297 |
Rwork/ Rfree | 22.9 / 28.3 |
No. atoms | |
Protein | 13995 |
Water | 4 |
B-factors | |
Protein | 110.6 |
Water | 95.5 |
R.m.s deviations | |
Bond lengths (Å) | 0.01 |
Bond angles (º) |
Highest resolution shell is shown in parenthesis.
7. Shuttle vector design, genetic complementation by conjugation, and recombinant expression of the S234A and D233A-S234A-S235A (DSS mutants) BabA in H. pylori (Figure S5G).
The H. pylori shuttle vector pIB6 is based on the pHel3 plasmid 57 that has been further modified to contain the alpA promoter upstream of a multiple cloning site where the various babA alleles were introduced 14,58. The babA gene from 17875/Leb was cloned into the shuttle vector pIB6 and transformed into the H. pylori P1∆babA strain as described by 14. The pIB6-babA17875/Leb was used for the mutagenesis procedure where the S234A mutant and the DSS mutants were constructed by PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis using Genscript (Piscataway, NJ, USA). Fragments were re-cloned in pIB6 using NdeI and NotI restriction sites to make up the shuttle vector plasmids (SV) SVS234A and SVDSS/AAA that were transformed into the dapA-negative E. coli strain β2150. This “donor” strain is strictly dependent on exogenously supplied diaminopimelic acid. Hence, the removal of diaminopimelic acid provides an efficient counter-selection against this donor. All “donor” strains with the various babA shuttle vector plasmids were conjugated into the H. pylori strain P1∆babA. Plasmids from transformed H. pylori clones were re-isolated, and the full babA sequence from each mutant type was sequenced at MWG Operon, Germany. The tested clones showed the correct sequence.
8. Amplification and analysis of BabA sequences.
Bacterial cells of strains listed in Table S7 were grown, and colonies were removed from the plates, washed, and re-suspended in 1 mL of PBS to OD600nm = 1.0. This suspension was used to isolate genomic DNA according to the manufacturer’s instructions (DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit, Qiagen). BabA fragments covering nucleotide 1 to approximately nucleotide 1200 were amplified by PCR with 4 µL of genomic DNA as the template and a combination of either one of the two forward primers babA2–271 11 (5′-ATC CAA AAA GGA GAA AAA ACA TGA AA-3′) or babA2-Leader (5′-GCT TTT AGT TTC CAC TTT GAG-3′) and either one of the two reverse primers J11R (5′-TGT GTG CCA CTA GTG CCA GC-3`) or A26R (5′-TTG CTC CAC ATA GGC GCA C-3′). The PCR fragments were ligated into pGEM-T (Promega, Madison, CA, USA) and sequenced with T7 and SP6 promoter-specific primers. Nucleotide sequences were determined by the dideoxy chain-termination method of Sanger using the Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) or using the services of Eurofins (Ebersberg, Germany). Assembly and sequence analysis was performed with Vector NTI version 10 (Invitrogen). Sequences that originated from Aspholm et al. 11 are indicated by stars. Sequences that originated from Bugaytsova et al. 14 are indicated by triangles. Mexican Mc1215, Mc1207, and Mc1201 were sequenced by the J. Torres lab (co-author). Sequence analysis including alignments using the ClustalW algorithm was performed using DNASTAR/Lasergene MegAlign Pro Software.
9. Amino acid positions in the BabA CBD that modulate ABbA binding affinity (Figure 6D and Table S7).
The amino acid residues were derived from BabA alignments of 123 strains from world-wide populations. The alignments were based on high-affinity binding strains that bind ABbA >20% vs. low-affinity binding strain that bind ABbA <2%. The amino acid configuration and composition at each position is expressed in terms of the relative size of the amino acid 1-letter code.
10. Genome sequencing of strain CCUG17875
DNA was extracted from bacterial biomass using a modified Marmur procedure 59. The short read library was prepared using the Illumina DNA PCR-Free protocol aiming for insert sizes of 550 bp and was subsequently sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq v3 chemistry generating 2*300 bp reads. Libraries for long read sequencing were barcoded using the SQK-RBK004 Rapid Barcoding Kit and sequenced on the Oxford Nanopore MinION platform, flow cell version FLO-MIN106. Raw Fast5 files were base called and demultiplexed using the Guppy software v. 4.2.2. Hybrid assemblies of Illumina and ONT reads were performed using the Unicycler software v0.4.8 60. The de novo assembly produced a circular, complete chromosome of 1,635,834 bp and a plasmid of 8,108 bp. Genome sequencing data for H. pylori CCUG 17875 and its plasmid are available from GenBank under BioProject PRJNA793037 with accession number CP090367 and CP0903678, respectively.
11. Construction of the phylogenetic tree (Figure 2B).
The phylogenetic distance was calculated based on kmer sharing using mash v. 2.0. (REF: Mash: fast genome and metagenome distance estimation using MinHash 61). The tree was generated using RapidNJ v. 2.3.2. Genomic sequences used as worldwide references were:
Genome | GenBank Accession |
---|---|
26695 | GCA_000008525.1 |
51 | GCA_000011725.1 |
908 | GCA_000148665.1 |
Aklavik117 | GCA_000315955.1 |
ausabrJ05 | GCA_001653435.1 |
ELS37 | GCA_000255955.1 |
F30 | GCA_000270025.1 |
Gambia94/24 | GCA_000185205.1 |
HPAG1 | GCA_000013245.1 |
HUP-B14 | GCA_000259235.1 |
India7 | GCA_000185185.1 |
J99 | GCA_013177275.1 |
K26A1 | GCA_001653455.1 |
L7 | GCA_001653375.1 |
NCTC 11637 | GCA_900478295.1 |
P12 | GCA_000021465.1 |
PNG84A | GCA_001653475.1 |
Shi112 | GCA_000277405.1 |
SouthAfrica7 | GCA_000185245.1 |
J166 | GCA_000685625.1 |
USU101 | GCA_006874685.1 |
12. Acid sensitivity in H. pylori BabA-mediated Leb binding and Leb inhibition (Figure 6E).
Acid sensitivity of H. pylori binding was performed according to 14. Acid sensitivity of scFv and ABbA binding to the BabA of H. pylori 17875/Leb was assessed by incubation of the radiolabeled scFvs or ABbA-IgG in nine buffers with pH ranging from 2.0 to 6.0 with 0.5 pH unit increments (as described in 14). The assay was performed by mixing 890 µl of pure pH buffer, 10 µl of radiolabeled scFv or ABbA-IgG in the corresponding pH buffer, and 100 µl of bacterial suspensions (OD600 = 1.0) in blocking-buffer (pH 7.4). The obtained suspension was incubated on a rocking table at room temperature for 1 h, and the cells were pelleted by centrifugation. CPMs in the pellet and supernatant were measured using the 2470 Wizard2 Gamma Counter (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA), and binding at each pH was determined as described in 2.3. Analysis of BabA binding properties by RIA.
13. QUANTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Data were analyzed using Graphpad Prism 9.0 (Graph Pad software, La Jolla, CA, USA) or R, version 4.0.2 (R Core Team, 2020). Depending on the experimental design and type of variables under investigation, different methods were utilized. Statistical significance regarding group comparisons was investigated via either unpaired or paired Student’s t-test or the Wilcoxon signed rank test, while associations between variables were tested using Pearson and/or Spearman correlation or Odds Ratios. Further classification performance was assessed using Area Under the Curve (AUC) in a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and by permutation tests. Details on the tests used can be found in the respective figure legends. P-values < 0.05 were considered significant (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001), and p > 0.05 was non-significant (NS). Tests were two-tailed unless otherwise stated.
Supplementary Material
KEY RESOURCES TABLE.
REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
---|---|---|
Antibodies | ||
Rabbit polyclonal Anti-BabA sera | Alexej Schmidt | This study |
Goat Anti-Rabbit Immunoglobulins/HRP | DAKO | Cat# P044801-2 |
Goat Anti-Mouse Immunoglobulins/HRP | DAKO | Cat# P044701-2 |
Human IgG, HRP-linked whole Ab (from sheep) | Amersham ECL | Cat# NA933-1ML |
Biotin Anti-Myc tag antibody [9E10] | Abcam | Cat# ab81658 |
Bacterial strains | ||
Helicobacter pylori CCUG17875 | Culture Collection University of Gothenburg | Cat# 17875 |
Helicobacter pylori CCUG17874 | Culture Collection University of Gothenburg | Cat# 17874 |
Chemicals | ||
BSA | Sigma | Cat# A7030 |
EDTA | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# AM9261 |
Manganese (II) chloride | Sigma | Cat# 244589-10G |
DAPI | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# 62248 |
Urea | Sigma | Cat# U0631-1KG |
Trypsin | Promega | Cat# V5111 |
Acetonitrile (ACN) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# A9554 |
DNase I | Sigma | Cat# 4716728001 |
b-mercaptoethanol | Gibco | Cat# 21985 |
FITC | Sigma | Cat # 46950-250MG-F |
Mayers HTX | Histolab | Cat# 01825 |
Eosin Y 0,2% | Histolab | Cat# 01650 |
Formaldehyde 4% Buffered | Histolab | Cat# 02178 |
Lewis b HSA; Lacto-N-difucohexaose I-APD, HAS conjugate | IsoSep AB | Cas# 61/08-0005 |
Dithiothreitol | Sigma | Cat# 10197777001 |
Critical commercial assays | ||
Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# 23225 |
Halt Protease Inhibitor Cocktail, EDTA-Free | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# 78439 |
LabSafe GEL Blue | G-biosciences | Cat# 786-35 |
7.5% Mini-PROTEAN® TGX™ Precast Protein Gels, 10-well, 30 µL | Bio-Rad | Cat# 4561023 |
HiTrap Protein G High Performance column | Cytiva | Cat# 17040401 |
Disposable PD-10 Desalting Columns | Cytiva | Cat# 11768488 |
Immun-Blot® PVDF Membrane | Bio-Rad | Cat# 1620177 |
SuperSignal™ West Pico PLUS Chemiluminescent Substrate | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# 34577 |
Nunc™ 96-Well Polystyrene Round Bottom Microwell Plates | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# 262162 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank T. Ny for valuable discussions; The Biochemical Imaging Centre Umeå (BICU) within the National Microscopy Infrastructure (NMI); The Protein Expertise Platform (PEP) at Umeå University; S. Dübel for providing plasmids. We thank Ö. Furberg (NoPolo.se) for the digital movie and illustration and M. Borén and E. Morrow for the figure work. This research work was supported by the Swedish Medical Research Council (VR) (2017–02183), Cancerfonden (CF) (CAN 2018/807, and 21/1875), the Umeå University Biotechnology Fund, the J.C. Kempe and Seth M. Kempe Memorial Foundation to TB, and the Erling-Persson Family Foundation to TB, LH, and RMo, and was in part performed within The Ukrainian-Swedish Research Center SUMEYA. The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the ERASMUS program (EU funding) for PhD student exchange within the collaboration between Umeå University and Sumy State University (grant 2017-1-SE01-KA107-034386). The work was also supported by the VR (2019–01598) and the CF (20 0964 PjF) and Region Västerbotten (ALF) to ML; the VR, the Swedish Society of Medicine, the Norrbotten County Council, Astra Zeneca R&D, the Orion Research Foundation, and the Finnish Medical Foundation to JR; the US NIH (R21AI140038) to DSM; and the Science Foundation Ireland Awards 16/RC/3889 and 13/IA/1959 to SO. Structural studies were supported by the Flanders Research Foundation (FWO; grants G033717N and G1521517N). We acknowledge access to the ESRF and are grateful to the staff at the ID29 beamline.
Abbreviations:
- scFv
single chain fragment variable
- mAb
monoclonal antibody
- bbAb
broadly blocking antibody
- Rf
Risk factor
- CBD
carbohydrate binding domain
- GM
glycan mimicry
- DU
duodenal ulcer disease
- GA
gastritis
Footnotes
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Supplemental information can be found online at XXX
Figures S1 to S6
DECLARATION OF INTERESTS
The authors declare the following competing interests: T. Borén and L. Hammarström are founders of Helicure AB and, own the IP-rights to the anti-BabA ABbA-IgG1 (US patent US8025880B2) and own the IP-rights to the gastric cancer vaccine and diagnostics described in the two manuscripts by Bugaytsova et al., 2023 (Patent Application SE 2350423-6).
Reference for R; R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
REFERENCES
- 1.Malfertheiner P., Link A., and Selgrad M. (2014). Helicobacter pylori: perspectives and time trends. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 11, 628–638. 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Graham D.Y. (2014). History of Helicobacter pylori, duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer and gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 20, 5191–5204. 10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Polk D.B., and Peek R.M. Jr. (2010). Helicobacter pylori: gastric cancer and beyond. Nat Rev Cancer 10, 403–414. 10.1038/nrc2857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Liou J.M., Malfertheiner P., Lee Y.C., Sheu B.S., Sugano K., Cheng H.C., Yeoh K.G., Hsu P.I., Goh K.L., Mahachai V., et al. (2020). Screening and eradication of Helicobacter pylori for gastric cancer prevention: the Taipei global consensus. Gut 69, 2093–2112. 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R.L., Torre L.A., and Jemal A. (2018). Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68, 394–424. 10.3322/caac.21492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Soreide K., Thorsen K., Harrison E.M., Bingener J., Moller M.H., Ohene-Yeboah M., and Soreide J.A. (2015). Perforated peptic ulcer. Lancet 386, 1288–1298. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00276-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gerhard M., Lehn N., Neumayer N., Boren T., Rad R., Schepp W., Miehlke S., Classen M., and Prinz C. (1999). Clinical relevance of the Helicobacter pylori gene for blood-group antigen-binding adhesin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96, 12778–12783. 10.1073/pnas.96.22.12778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Su Y.L., Huang H.L., Huang B.S., Chen P.C., Chen C.S., Wang H.L., Lin P.H., Chieh M.S., Wu J.J., Yang J.C., and Chow L.P. (2016). Combination of OipA, BabA, and SabA as candidate biomarkers for predicting Helicobacter pylori-related gastric cancer. Sci Rep 6, 36442. 10.1038/srep36442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Boren T., Falk P., Roth K.A., Larson G., and Normark S. (1993). Attachment of Helicobacter pylori to human gastric epithelium mediated by blood group antigens. Science 262, 1892–1895. 10.1126/science.8018146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ilver D., Arnqvist A., Ogren J., Frick I.M., Kersulyte D., Incecik E.T., Berg D.E., Covacci A., Engstrand L., and Boren T. (1998). Helicobacter pylori adhesin binding fucosylated histo-blood group antigens revealed by retagging. Science 279, 373–377. 10.1126/science.279.5349.373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Aspholm-Hurtig M., Dailide G., Lahmann M., Kalia A., Ilver D., Roche N., Vikstrom S., Sjostrom R., Linden S., Backstrom A., et al. (2004). Functional adaptation of BabA, the H. pylori ABO blood group antigen binding adhesin. Science 305, 519–522. 10.1126/science.1098801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Linden S., Nordman H., Hedenbro J., Hurtig M., Boren T., and Carlstedt I. (2002). Strain- and blood group-dependent binding of Helicobacter pylori to human gastric MUC5AC glycoforms. Gastroenterology 123, 1923–1930. 10.1053/gast.2002.37076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Moonens K., Gideonsson P., Subedi S., Bugaytsova J., Romao E., Mendez M., Norden J., Fallah M., Rakhimova L., Shevtsova A., et al. (2016). Structural Insights into Polymorphic ABO Glycan Binding by Helicobacter pylori. Cell Host Microbe 19, 55–66. 10.1016/j.chom.2015.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bugaytsova J.A., Bjornham O., Chernov Y.A., Gideonsson P., Henriksson S., Mendez M., Sjostrom R., Mahdavi J., Shevtsova A., Ilver D., et al. (2017). Helicobacter pylori Adapts to Chronic Infection and Gastric Disease via pH-Responsive BabA-Mediated Adherence. Cell Host Microbe 21, 376–389. 10.1016/j.chom.2017.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Haas G., Karaali G., Ebermayer K., Metzger W.G., Lamer S., Zimny-Arndt U., Diescher S., Goebel U.B., Vogt K., Roznowski A.B., et al. (2002). Immunoproteomics of Helicobacter pylori infection and relation to gastric disease. Proteomics 2, 313–324. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kimmel B., Bosserhoff A., Frank R., Gross R., Goebel W., and Beier D. (2000). Identification of immunodominant antigens from Helicobacter pylori and evaluation of their reactivities with sera from patients with different gastroduodenal pathologies. Infect Immun 68, 915–920. 10.1128/IAI.68.2.915-920.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Meinke A., Storm M., Henics T., Gelbmann D., Prustomersky S., Kovacs Z., Minh D.B., Noiges B., Stierschneider U., Berger M., et al. (2009). Composition of the ANTIGENome of Helicobacter pylori defined by human serum antibodies. Vaccine 27, 3251–3259. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.01.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kamada N., Sakamoto K., Seo S.U., Zeng M.Y., Kim Y.G., Cascalho M., Vallance B.A., Puente J.L., and Nunez G. (2015). Humoral Immunity in the Gut Selectively Targets Phenotypically Virulent Attaching-and-Effacing Bacteria for Intraluminal Elimination. Cell Host Microbe 17, 617–627. 10.1016/j.chom.2015.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Futagami S., Takahashi H., Norose Y., and Kobayashi M. (1998). Systemic and local immune responses against Helicobacter pylori urease in patients with chronic gastritis: distinct IgA and IgG productive sites. Gut 43, 168–175. 10.1136/gut.43.2.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Aro P., Storskrubb T., Ronkainen J., Bolling-Sternevald E., Engstrand L., Vieth M., Stolte M., Talley N.J., and Agreus L. (2006). Peptic ulcer disease in a general adult population: the Kalixanda study: a random population-based study. Am J Epidemiol 163, 1025–1034. 10.1093/aje/kwj129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kang J.Y. (1990). Age of onset of symptoms in duodenal and gastric ulcer. Gut 31, 854–857. 10.1136/gut.31.8.854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Munoz-Ramirez Z.Y., Pascoe B., Mendez-Tenorio A., Mourkas E., Sandoval-Motta S., Perez-Perez G., Morgan D.R., Dominguez R.L., Ortiz-Princz D., Cavazza M.E., et al. (2021). A 500-year tale of co-evolution, adaptation, and virulence: Helicobacter pylori in the Americas. ISME J 15, 78–92. 10.1038/s41396-020-00758-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ekstrom A.M., Held M., Hansson L.E., Engstrand L., and Nyren O. (2001). Helicobacter pylori in gastric cancer established by CagA immunoblot as a marker of past infection. Gastroenterology 121, 784–791. 10.1053/gast.2001.27999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dubel S., Breitling F., Fuchs P., Braunagel M., Klewinghaus I., and Little M. (1993). A family of vectors for surface display and production of antibodies. Gene 128, 97–101. 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90159-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hage N., Howard T., Phillips C., Brassington C., Overman R., Debreczeni J., Gellert P., Stolnik S., Winkler G.S., and Falcone F.H. (2015). Structural basis of Lewis(b) antigen binding by the Helicobacter pylori adhesin BabA. Sci Adv 1, e1500315. 10.1126/sciadv.1500315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schreiber S., Konradt M., Groll C., Scheid P., Hanauer G., Werling H.O., Josenhans C., and Suerbaum S. (2004). The spatial orientation of Helicobacter pylori in the gastric mucus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101, 5024–5029. 10.1073/pnas.0308386101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Falush D., Kraft C., Taylor N.S., Correa P., Fox J.G., Achtman M., and Suerbaum S. (2001). Recombination and mutation during long-term gastric colonization by Helicobacter pylori: estimates of clock rates, recombination size, and minimal age. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98, 15056–15061. 10.1073/pnas.251396098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Salama N.R., Hartung M.L., and Muller A. (2013). Life in the human stomach: persistence strategies of the bacterial pathogen Helicobacter pylori. Nat Rev Microbiol 11, 385–399. 10.1038/nrmicro3016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sutton P., and Boag J.M. (2019). Status of vaccine research and development for Helicobacter pylori. Vaccine 37, 7295–7299. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Soto G., Bautista C.T., Roth D.E., Gilman R.H., Velapatino B., Ogura M., Dailide G., Razuri M., Meza R., Katz U., et al. (2003). Helicobacter pylori reinfection is common in Peruvian adults after antibiotic eradication therapy. J Infect Dis 188, 1263–1275. 10.1086/379046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Morgan D.R., and Torres J. (2013). The stratification of gastric cancer risk in Latin America. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 78, 125–126. 10.1016/j.rgmx.2013.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wu N.C., and Wilson I.A. (2020). Influenza Hemagglutinin Structures and Antibody Recognition. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 10. 10.1101/cshperspect.a038778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yamaoka Y., Souchek J., Odenbreit S., Haas R., Arnqvist A., Boren T., Kodama T., Osato M.S., Gutierrez O., Kim J.G., and Graham D.Y. (2002). Discrimination between cases of duodenal ulcer and gastritis on the basis of putative virulence factors of Helicobacter pylori. J Clin Microbiol 40, 2244–2246. 10.1128/JCM.40.6.2244-2246.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bogstedt A.K., Nava S., Wadstrom T., and Hammarstrom L. (1996). Helicobacter pylori infections in IgA deficiency: lack of role for the secretory immune system. Clin Exp Immunol 105, 202–204. 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1996.d01-745.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mellemkjaer L., Hammarstrom L., Andersen V., Yuen J., Heilmann C., Barington T., Bjorkander J., and Olsen J.H. (2002). Cancer risk among patients with IgA deficiency or common variable immunodeficiency and their relatives: a combined Danish and Swedish study. Clin Exp Immunol 130, 495–500. 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2002.02004.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Marquez E.J., Chung C.H., Marches R., Rossi R.J., Nehar-Belaid D., Eroglu A., Mellert D.J., Kuchel G.A., Banchereau J., and Ucar D. (2020). Sexual-dimorphism in human immune system aging. Nat Commun 11, 751. 10.1038/s41467-020-14396-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.D’Elios M.M., Manghetti M., De Carli M., Costa F., Baldari C.T., Burroni D., Telford J.L., Romagnani S., and Del Prete G. (1997). T helper 1 effector cells specific for Helicobacter pylori in the gastric antrum of patients with peptic ulcer disease. J Immunol 158, 962–967. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Huang J.Y., Sweeney E.G., Sigal M., Zhang H.C., Remington S.J., Cantrell M.A., Kuo C.J., Guillemin K., and Amieva M.R. (2015). Chemodetection and Destruction of Host Urea Allows Helicobacter pylori to Locate the Epithelium. Cell Host Microbe 18, 147–156. 10.1016/j.chom.2015.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Skoog E.C., Martin M.E., Barrozo R.M., Hansen L.M., Cai L.P., Lee S.J., Benoun J.M., McSorley S.J., and Solnick J.V. (2020). Maintenance of Type IV Secretion Function During Helicobacter pylori Infection in Mice. mBio 11. 10.1128/mBio.03147-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Falush D., Wirth T., Linz B., Pritchard J.K., Stephens M., Kidd M., Blaser M.J., Graham D.Y., Vacher S., Perez-Perez G.I., et al. (2003). Traces of human migrations in Helicobacter pylori populations. Science 299, 1582–1585. 10.1126/science.1080857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mahdavi J., Sonden B., Hurtig M., Olfat F.O., Forsberg L., Roche N., Angstrom J., Larsson T., Teneberg S., Karlsson K.A., et al. (2002). Helicobacter pylori SabA adhesin in persistent infection and chronic inflammation. Science 297, 573–578. 10.1126/science.1069076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Aspholm M., Kalia A., Ruhl S., Schedin S., Arnqvist A., Linden S., Sjostrom R., Gerhard M., Semino-Mora C., Dubois A., et al. (2006). Helicobacter pylori adhesion to carbohydrates. Methods Enzymol 417, 293–339. 10.1016/S0076-6879(06)17020-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Solnick J.V., Hansen L.M., Canfield D.R., and Parsonnet J. (2001). Determination of the infectious dose of Helicobacter pylori during primary and secondary infection in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Infect Immun 69, 6887–6892. 10.1128/IAI.69.11.6887-6892.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Liu H., Fero J.B., Mendez M., Carpenter B.M., Servetas S.L., Rahman A., Goldman M.D., Boren T., Salama N.R., Merrell D.S., and Dubois A. (2015). Analysis of a single Helicobacter pylori strain over a 10-year period in a primate model. Int J Med Microbiol 305, 392–403. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2015.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Johansson D.X., Drakenberg K., Hopmann K.H., Schmidt A., Yari F., Hinkula J., and Persson M.A. (2007). Efficient expression of recombinant human monoclonal antibodies in Drosophila S2 cells. J Immunol Methods 318, 37–46. 10.1016/j.jim.2006.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Marks J.D., Hoogenboom H.R., Bonnert T.P., McCafferty J., Griffiths A.D., and Winter G. (1991). By-passing immunization. Human antibodies from V-gene libraries displayed on phage. J Mol Biol 222, 581–597. 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90498-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Schmidt A., Muller D., Mersmann M., Wuest T., Gerlach E., Garin-Chesa P., Rettig W.J., Pfizenmaier K., and Moosmayer D. (2001). Generation of human high-affinity antibodies specific for the fibroblast activation protein by guided selection. Eur J Biochem 268, 1730–1738. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Welschof M., Terness P., Kolbinger F., Zewe M., Dubel S., Dorsam H., Hain C., Finger M., Jung M., Moldenhauer G., and et al. (1995). Amino acid sequence based PCR primers for amplification of rearranged human heavy and light chain immunoglobulin variable region genes. J Immunol Methods 179, 203–214. 10.1016/0022-1759(94)00286-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Schier R., Bye J., Apell G., McCall A., Adams G.P., Malmqvist M., Weiner L.M., and Marks J.D. (1996). Isolation of high-affinity monomeric human anti-c-erbB-2 single chain Fv using affinity-driven selection. J Mol Biol 255, 28–43. 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Koch J., Breitling F., and Dubel S. (2000). Rapid titration of multiple samples of filamentous bacteriophage (M13) on nitrocellulose filters. Biotechniques 29, 1196–1198, 2002. 10.2144/00296bm08. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mersmann M., Schmidt A., Tesar M., Schoneberg A., Welschof M., Kipriyanov S., Terness P., Little M., Pfizenmaier K., and Moosmayer D. (1998). Monitoring of scFv selected by phage display using detection of scFv-pIII fusion proteins in a microtiter scale assay. J Immunol Methods 220, 51–58. 10.1016/s0022-1759(98)00144-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Subedi S., Moonens K., Romao E., Lo A., Vandenbussche G., Bugaytsova J., Muyldermans S., Boren T., and Remaut H. (2014). Expression, purification and X-ray crystallographic analysis of the Helicobacter pylori blood group antigen-binding adhesin BabA. Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun 70, 1631–1635. 10.1107/S2053230X14023188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kabsch W. (2010). Xds. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66, 125–132. 10.1107/S0907444909047337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.McCoy A.J., Grosse-Kunstleve R.W., Adams P.D., Winn M.D., Storoni L.C., and Read R.J. (2007). Phaser crystallographic software. J Appl Crystallogr 40, 658–674. 10.1107/S0021889807021206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Emsley P., and Cowtan K. (2004). Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 60, 2126–2132. 10.1107/S0907444904019158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Afonine P.V., Grosse-Kunstleve R.W., Echols N., Headd J.J., Moriarty N.W., Mustyakimov M., Terwilliger T.C., Urzhumtsev A., Zwart P.H., and Adams P.D. (2012). Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 68, 352–367. 10.1107/S0907444912001308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Heuermann D., and Haas R. (1998). A stable shuttle vector system for efficient genetic complementation of Helicobacter pylori strains by transformation and conjugation. Mol Gen Genet 257, 519–528. 10.1007/s004380050677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Jimenez-Soto L.F., Clausen S., Sprenger A., Ertl C., and Haas R. (2013). Dynamics of the Cag-type IV secretion system of Helicobacter pylori as studied by bacterial co-infections. Cell Microbiol 15, 1924–1937. 10.1111/cmi.12166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Salvà Serra F., Salvà-Serra F., Svensson-Stadler L., Busquets A., Jaén-Luchoro D., Karlsson R., Moore R. B., E., and Gomila M. (2018). A protocol for extraction and purification of high-quality and quantity bacterial DNA applicable for genome sequencing: a modified version of the Marmur procedure. Protocol Exchange. 10.1038/protex.2018.084. [DOI]
- 60.Wick R.R., Judd L.M., Gorrie C.L., and Holt K.E. (2017). Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13, e1005595. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ondov B.D., Treangen T.J., Melsted P., Mallonee A.B., Bergman N.H., Koren S., and Phillippy A.M. (2016). Mash: fast genome and metagenome distance estimation using MinHash. Genome Biol 17, 132. 10.1186/s13059-016-0997-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Robin X., Turck N., Hainard A., Tiberti N., Lisacek F., Sanchez J.C., and Muller M. (2011). pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 77. 10.1186/1471-2105-12-77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Solnick J.V., Hansen L.M., Salama N.R., Boonjakuakul J.K., and Syvanen M. (2004). Modification of Helicobacter pylori outer membrane protein expression during experimental infection of rhesus macaques. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101, 2106–2111. 10.1073/pnas.0308573100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ladner R.C. (2007). Mapping the epitopes of antibodies. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 24, 1–30. 10.1080/02648725.2007.10648092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Celli J.P., Turner B.S., Afdhal N.H., Keates S., Ghiran I., Kelly C.P., Ewoldt R.H., McKinley G.H., So P., Erramilli S., and Bansil R. (2009). Helicobacter pylori moves through mucus by reducing mucin viscoelasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106, 14321–14326. 10.1073/pnas.0903438106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Genome sequencing data for H. pylori CCUG 17875 and its plasmid are available from GenBank with the accession number CP090367 and CP0903678, respectively. The ABbA-BabA co-crystal coordinates are available by the Accession code: PDB ID 7ZQT. All other data are available in the main text or the supplemental information. Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.