Skip to main content
PMC home page
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1991 Dec;66(6):443–447. doi: 10.1136/hrt.66.6.443

Effect of left bundle branch block on diastolic function in dilated cardiomyopathy.

H B Xiao 1, C H Lee 1, D G Gibson 1
PMCID: PMC1024819  PMID: 1772710

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To assess the diastolic effect of left bundle branch block in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. DESIGN--Retrospective study of M mode and Doppler echocardiograms along with electrocardiogram and phonocardiogram. SETTING--Tertiary referral cardiac centre. PATIENT PARTICIPANTS--Fifty two patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, all with functional mitral regurgitation. Twelve with left bundle branch block (group 1) were compared with 40 without (group 2). RESULTS--Mean (SD) age 60 (15) v 55 (18) years, left ventricular end diastolic dimension 72 (9) v 70 (7) mm, and heart rate 88 (15) v 84 (15) beats/min were similar in both groups. In patients with left bundle branch block the electromechanical delay, 50 (20) v 70 (20) ms, was shorter (p less than 0.05) whereas the preejection contraction time, measured from the onset of mitral regurgitation to that of aortic ejection, 130 (40) v 70 (20) ms (p less than 0.01), and left ventricular relaxation time, A2 to the end of mitral regurgitation, 130 (30) v 80 (30) ms (p less than 0.01), were both prolonged. Ejection time itself was similar, 230 (40) v 235 (40) ms. Thus the overall duration of mitral regurgitation was increased (495 (90) v 390 (60) ms (p less than 0.01], which made filling time shorter (190 (45) v 325 (90) ms (p less than 0.01]. In patients with left bundle branch block, unlike those without, contraction and relaxation times both shortened as RR interval fell; this made the duration of mitral regurgitation more sensitive to heart rate. Filling time was less than 200 ms in eight out of 12 patients with left bundle branch block and four out of 40 patients without (p less than 0.001). CONCLUSION--Left bundle branch block prolongs rather than delays mitral regurgitation by increasing pre-ejection and relaxation times. This directly impairs diastolic function by shortening the time available for the left ventricule to fill to an extent likely to limit stroke volume.

Full text

PDF
446

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baragan J., Fernandez-Caamano F., Sozutek Y., Coblence B., Lenègre J. Chronic left complete bundle-branch block. Phonocardiographic and mechanocardiographic study of 30 cases. Br Heart J. 1968 Mar;30(2):196–202. doi: 10.1136/hrt.30.2.196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen W., Gibson D. Mechanisms of prolongation of pre-ejection period in patients with left ventricular disease. Br Heart J. 1979 Sep;42(3):304–310. doi: 10.1136/hrt.42.3.304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen W., Gibson D. Relation of isovolumic relaxation to left ventricular wall movement in man. Br Heart J. 1979 Jul;42(1):51–56. doi: 10.1136/hrt.42.1.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gibson D. G., Prewitt T. A., Brown D. J. Analysis of left ventricular wall movement during isovolumic relaxation and its relation to coronary artery disease. Br Heart J. 1976 Oct;38(10):1010–1019. doi: 10.1136/hrt.38.10.1010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Keren G., Katz S., Strom J., Sonnenblick E. H., LeJemtel T. H. Noninvasive quantification of mitral regurgitation in dilated cardiomyopathy: correlation of two Doppler echocardiographic methods. Am Heart J. 1988 Sep;116(3):758–764. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(88)90334-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kreulen T. H., Gorlin R., Herman M. V. Ventriculographic patterns and hemodynamics in primary myocardial disease. Circulation. 1973 Feb;47(2):299–308. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.47.2.299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ng K. S., Gibson D. G. Impairment of diastolic function by shortened filling period in severe left ventricular disease. Br Heart J. 1989 Oct;62(4):246–252. doi: 10.1136/hrt.62.4.246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ng K. S., Gibson D. G. Relation of filling pattern to diastolic function in severe left ventricular disease. Br Heart J. 1990 Apr;63(4):209–214. doi: 10.1136/hrt.63.4.209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Shaver J. A., Rahko P. S., Grines C. L., Boudoulas H., Wooley C. F. Effects of left bundle branch block on the events of the cardiac cycle. Acta Cardiol. 1988;43(4):459–467. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Strauss R. H., Stevenson L. W., Dadourian B. A., Child J. S. Predictability of mitral regurgitation detected by Doppler echocardiography in patients referred for cardiac transplantation. Am J Cardiol. 1987 Apr 1;59(8):892–894. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)91114-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES