Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2023 Jun 20;131(6):067009. doi: 10.1289/EHP11120

Association between First Trimester Exposure to Ambient PM2.5 and NO2 and Congenital Heart Defects: A Population-Based Cohort Study of 1,342,198 Live Births in Canada

Stéphane Buteau 1,2,, Paige Veira 3, Marianne Bilodeau-Bertrand 1, Nathalie Auger 1,3,4,5
PMCID: PMC10281560  PMID: 37339064

Abstract

Background:

The extent to which ambient air pollution contributes to the pathogenesis of congenital heart defects remains uncertain.

Objective:

We investigated whether first trimester exposure to ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) was associated with the risk of critical and noncritical heart defects in a large population-based cohort of births.

Methods:

We carried out a retrospective cohort study of children conceived between 2000 and 2016 in Quebec, Canada. Heart defects were identified via data from the Maintenance and Use of Data for the Study of Hospital Clientele registry. The main exposures were average concentration of PM2.5 and NO2 in a) the first trimester and b) the month of conception. Exposures were estimated at the residential postal code. Associations with critical and noncritical heart defects were assessed using logistic regression models, adjusted for maternal and infant characteristics. We considered single- and two-pollutant models and assessed modifying effects of maternal comorbidity, including preexisting hypertension, preeclampsia, anemia, and diabetes.

Results:

The cohort comprised 1,342,198 newborns, including 12,715 with heart defects. Exposure in the first trimester and month of conception yielded similar results; both were associated with a greater risk of heart defects. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) for any heart defect per interquartile range increase were 1.02 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.05) for PM2.5 and 1.10 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.13) for NO2. Associations with atrial septal defects were 1.08 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.14) for PM2.5 and 1.19 (95% CI: 1.12, 1.25) for NO2. Corresponding ORs for ventricular septal defects and individual critical heart defects were not significant. PM2.5 (OR=1.11; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.17) and NO2 (OR=1.23; 95% CI: 1.17, 1.31) exposure were associated with a greater risk of heart defects in mothers with comorbidity.

Discussion:

In this population-based cohort, prenatal exposure to ambient air pollution during the first trimester was associated with an increased risk of heart defects, particularly atrial septal defects. The association with heart defects was greater in mothers with comorbidity. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP11120

Introduction

Congenital heart anomalies are prevalent and account for nearly one-third of birth defects.1 In North America, 1.5% of newborns have heart defects.2 Heart defects are a leading cause of disability and infant mortality, but their etiology is poorly understood.3 Although it is established that genes are involved in many congenital anomalies, the contribution of modifiable risk factors is unclear.4,5 Approximately 50% of heart defects cannot be linked to a specific cause, and the proportion of potentially preventable cases could be as high as 30%.5

Environmental exposures are thought to play a role in the development of congenital heart anomalies. Several studies have reported associations between air pollutants and the risk of heart defects, including atrial septal defects, coarctation of the aorta, and tetralogy of Fallot.615 However, lack of statistical power and problems with exposure assessment have been major limitations of this work.1618 In most studies, exposures are assigned using monitoring stations nearest to the residence or include only subjects within a fixed radius. These methods of assessing exposure do not account for spatial variation of pollutants, which may lead to considerable exposure misclassification. In this study, we assessed whether spatiotemporal concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM2.5<2.5μm in aerodynamic diameter) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) were associated with the risk of critical and noncritical heart defects in a large population-based cohort of births in Canada.

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Population

We performed a retrospective cohort study of all hospital deliveries in the province of Quebec, Canada, using health administrative data. We restricted the cohort to newborns conceived between 2000 and 2016, the period when pollution data were collected. The cohort captures most of the population given that 98% of newborns in Quebec are delivered in hospital. Data were obtained from the Maintenance and Use of Data for the Study of Hospital Clientele registry, which contains discharge summaries with diagnostic information for all hospitalizations in Quebec. The data are coded by trained hospital archivists and validated through rigorous algorithms.19 Maternal chart numbers were recorded on newborn discharge summaries, which allowed us to link mothers with their infants. We excluded stillbirths because information on heart defects was not available. Given that the data were anonymized and the study conformed to the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans,20 our research institution issued a waiver from ethical review.

Congenital Heart Defects

The primary outcome included heart defects documented at delivery. Heart defects were identified during ultrasound screening in the second or third trimester or during clinical examination upon delivery. Heart defects were documented on physician discharge summaries and coded using diagnostic codes in the 9th and 10th revisions of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-921 and ICD-1022), and procedure codes in the Canadian Classification of Diagnostic, Therapeutic, and Surgical Procedures23 and Canadian Classification of Health Interventions24 (Table 1).

Table 1.

International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes for heart defect.

ICD-9 codesa ICD-10 codesa
Critical heart defect
 Tetralogy of Fallot 745.2 (47.81) Q21.3 (1.HP.87, 1.LD.84)
 Transposition of great vessels 745.1 Q20.1–Q20.3, Q20.50
 Truncus arteriosus 745.0 (47.83) Q20.0, Q21.4 (1.LA.84)
 Hypoplastic left heart 746.7 Q23.4
 Common ventricle 745.3 Q20.4
 Coarctation of aorta 747.1 Q25.1
 Other critical 746.01, 746.1, 746.2, 747.41 Q22.0, Q22.4, Q22.5, Q26.2
Noncritical heart defect
 Endocardial cushion 745.6 (47.55, 47.64, 47.74) Q21.2 (1.LC.84)
 Ventricular septum 745.4 (47.54, 47.63, 47.73) Q21.0, Q21.8 (1.HR.80)
 Atrial septum 745.5 (47.52, 47.53, 47.62, 47.72) Q21.1 (1.HN.80)
 Valve 746.00, 746.02, 746.09, 746.3–746.6 Q22.1–Q22.3, Q22.8–Q23.3, Q23.8, Q23.9
 Aorta 747.2 Q25.2–Q25.4
 Pulmonary artery 747.3 Q25.5–Q25.7
 Heterotaxy 746.87, 759.3 Q20.58, Q20.6, Q24.0, Q24.1, Q89.3
 Other Any defects in 745–746, 747.1–747.4 not listed above Any defects in Q20–Q24.9, Q25.1–Q26.4, Q26.8, Q26.9 not listed above

Note: ICD-9, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision21; ICD-10, .International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision.22

a

Values in parentheses refer to procedure codes (Canadian Classification of Diagnostic, Therapeutic, and Surgical Procedures23; Canadian Classification of Health Interventions24).

We classified heart defects as critical (tetralogy of Fallot, coarctation of the aorta, transposition of great vessels, truncus arteriosus, hypoplastic left heart, common ventricle, other) or noncritical (atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, endocardial cushion defect, pulmonary artery defects, heterotaxy, other).25 Critical defects require urgent intervention at birth and may cause severe sequalae or death if not treated promptly.26

We further evaluated four specific types of defects that were the focus of prior studies on heart defects and air pollution exposure: tetralogy of Fallot, coarctation of the aorta, atrial septal defects, and ventricular septal defects.16 Anomalies were not mutually exclusive. Because the atrium may not fully develop before 37 wk of gestation, we restricted the analysis of atrial septal defects to term births only.27

Air Pollution Exposure

Organogenesis in humans occurs in the first trimester of pregnancy, with different organ systems having varying periods of susceptibility to teratogenic agents. Except for the atrial septum, the fetal heart is fully formed by the 10th week of gestation.27 We therefore considered the first trimester of pregnancy as the critical window of exposure. We estimated the start and end date of the first trimester for each fetus. To calculate the date of conception, we subtracted the gestational age from the date of birth, and added 2 wk to account for the timing of ovulation after the last menstrual period. The date of birth and gestational age in completed weeks were documented on the infant chart. Gestational age was determined by dating ultrasounds in the first trimester.

The exposures of interest were ambient PM2.5 and NO2, two principal ambient air pollutants. We considered two exposure metrics: a) average concentration of pollutants in the month of conception and b) average exposure in the first trimester defined as the month of conception and the two following months. These exposures were assessed using spatially resolved monthly mean concentrations of ambient PM2.5 and NO2 extracted from the Canadian Urban Environmental Health Research Consortium.2830 Exposures were assigned to newborns using the mother’s six-digit residential postal code and date of conception. Exposure data were measured at the postal code, a fine geographic level that covers one side of a street block in urban areas, although areas covered may be greater in rural settings.

Monthly PM2.5 concentrations were estimated at a 0.01°×0.01° resolution (1km×1km) from satellite observations of aerosol optical depth based on the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Terra satellite.29 Estimates were calibrated using an optimal estimation algorithm incorporating ground-based observations in conjunction with a geographically weighted regression of urban land cover, elevation, and aerosol composition.29 The annual estimates from this model closely agree with long-term cross-validated ground measurements at fixed-site monitors across North America (r2=0.70).29

Ambient NO2 concentrations at residential postal codes were estimated from a national land-use regression model developed from fixed-site measurements at Environment Canada’s National Air Pollution Surveillance (NAPS) system.28,31 The model included satellite estimates of NO2, road length, industrial land use, and summer rainfall, and incorporated a distance–decay gradient based on proximity to highways and major roads to account for fine-scale geographic variability of NO2 from vehicle emissions. The model explained 73% of the variation in 2006 annual NAPS NO2 measurements. Monthly estimates were produced using ratios of measured monthly data over the measured annual average from NAPS stations across Canada.

Statistical Analysis

We assessed the association between prenatal exposure to ambient PM2.5 and NO2 and the odds of congenital heart defects using multivariable logistic regression. A directed acyclic graph (DAG) outlining the conceptual relation between congenital heart defects and first trimester exposure to ambient PM2.5 and NO2 is provided in Figure S1. We treated the two main exposure metrics, including a) average concentration in the month of conception, and b) average concentration in the first trimester, as continuous variables and assessed Pearson correlation coefficients. We fitted single-pollutant models, as well as two-pollutant models accounting for coexposure to PM2.5 and NO2.

Models were adjusted for the following covariates to be consistent with previous studies7,14,32,33: sex, birth year, maternal age (continuous), parity (zero, one, or two or more), multiple birth (yes/no), season of conception (fall, winter, spring, summer), rural or urban residence, and neighborhood material deprivation quintile (an index based on census data for average personal income, employment rate, and population without a high school diploma34). Although not all these variables are confounders in the typical sense, we adjusted for them nevertheless given that they may reduce bias from conditioning on live birth, as illustrated in the DAG (Figure S1).35,36 For the same reason, we adjusted the models for maternal comorbidity (treated as one variable; yes/no), including anemia, obesity, preeclampsia, preexisting hypertension, preexisting diabetes types 1 or 2, epilepsy or mood disorders, and substance use disorders (tobacco, alcohol, illicit drugs). These morbidities may be involved in pregnancy loss and are associated with a greater risk of heart defects.37,38 We obtained data for all these morbidities from the Maintenance and Use of Data for the Study of Hospital Clientele registry. We did not include gestational diabetes as a comorbidity because the onset of hyperglycemia is usually in the second trimester after the fetal heart has formed.

For all continuous variables (i.e., each pollutant and maternal age), we assessed nonlinearity of the relationship with heart defects using natural cubic splines with 3 degrees of freedom. We examined spline plots and compared the fit of linear and spline models using the Akaike information criterion.

In sensitivity analysis, we excluded newborns with multiple congenital anomalies. Because some studies suggest that air pollutants may have a greater effect on birth outcomes in women with preexisting morbidity,39,40 we carried out subgroup analyses to assess modifying effects of different the comorbidities listed above. We used Cochran’s Q test to assess heterogeneity across subgroups.41 We also assessed modifying effects of season of conception, given that hot temperature4244 and infection (respiratory/influenza)45 may influence the risk of heart defects. We performed subgroup analyses according to urban and rural residence because pollution mixtures in urban areas may differ. For the same reason, we assessed whether associations varied when we restricted the data to Montreal, the most populated region in Quebec. All statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.1.1; R Development Core Team).

Results

The cohort included 1,342,198 newborns conceived between 2000 and 2016 (Table 2). A total of 12,715 newborns were diagnosed with heart defects, for a prevalence of 9.5 cases [95% confidence interval (CI): 9.3, 9.6] per 1,000 births. Of 12,715 newborns diagnosed with heart defects, 2,592 had multiple anomalies. Maternal age (>40 y), multiple birth, and comorbidity were associated with a higher prevalence of heart defects.

Table 2.

Prevalence of any heart defects according to maternal and infant characteristics, Quebec (Canada), 2000–2016 (newborns, N=1,342,198; defects, N=12,715).

Newborns (n) Any heart defect
Defects (n) Prevalence per 1,000 (95% CI)
Maternal age (y)
<20 36,272 370 10.2 (9.2, 11.2)
 20–29 651,009 5,861 9.0 (8.9, 9.2)
 30–39 618,098 5,983 9.7 (9.4, 9.9)
40 36,819 501 13.6 (12.4, 14.8)
Comorbidity
 Any 180,454 3,013 16.7 (16.1, 17.3)
 Obesity 28,095 417 14.8 (13.4, 16.3)
 Diabetes type 1 or 2 11,161 429 38.4 (34.9, 42.0)
 Preeclampsia, gestational hypertension 47,146 719 15.3 (14.1, 16.4)
 Preexisting hypertension 20,936 340 17.6 (15.6, 19,6)
 Epilepsy and mood disorders 7,076 119 16.8 (13.8, 19.8)
 Anemia 70,969 1,476 15.3 (14.1, 16.4)
 Substance use disorder 24,175 273 11.3 (10.0, 12.6)
 Multiple comorbidities 21,104 569 27.0 (24.8, 29.1)
 No comorbidity 1,161,744 9,702 8.4 (8.2, 8.5)
Multiple birth
 Yes 38,890 769 19.8 (18.4, 21.2)
 No 1,303,308 11,946 9.2 (9.0, 9.3)
Parity
 0 668,966 6,435 9.6 (9.6, 9.9)
 1 465,008 4,208 9.1 (9.1, 9.3)
2 208,224 2,072 10.0 (9.5, 10.4)
Infant sex 1,342,198 12,715 9.5 (9.3, 9.6)
 Male 688,118 6,501 9.5 (9.2, 9.7)
 Female 654,080 6,214 9.5 (9.3, 9.7)
Neighborhood deprivation
 Low 240,032 2,082 8.7 (8.5, 9.2)
 Low-moderate 262,147 2,383 9.1 (8.3, 9.0)
 Moderate 259,752 2,431 9.4 (9.0, 9.7)
 Moderate-high 260,031 2,485 9.6 (9.2, 9.9)
 High 271,773 2,863 10.5 (10.2, 10.9)
 Unknown 48,463 471 9.7 (8.9, 10.6)
Residence
 Urban 1,076,888 10,249 9.5 (9.3, 9.7)
  Montreal 359,423 3,840 10.7 (10.3, 11.0)
 Rural 249,055 2,323 9.3 (9.0, 9.7)
Season of conception
 Winter 402,516 3,890 9.7 (9.1, 9.8)
 Spring 384,725 3,714 9.7 (9.4, 10.1)
 Summer 415,559 4,007 9.4 (9.1, 9.7)
 Fall 417,892 3,972 9.3 (9.0, 9.6)
Time period
 2000–2009 701,193 6,954 9.9 (9.7, 10.1)
 2010–2016 641,005 5,761 9.0 (8.8, 9.2)

Note: CI, confidence interval.

Average monthly exposures to pollutants in the first trimester were 8.0μg/m3 [interquartile range (IQR): 3.3μg/m3] for PM2.5 and 11.3 ppb (IQR: 11.4 ppb) for NO2 (Table 3). Exposures in the month of conception and first trimester were highly correlated (r=0.81 for PM2.5 and 0.97 for NO2) (Table S1).

Table 3.

Distribution of ambient PM2.5 and NO2 in the month of conception and first trimester of pregnancy among 1,342,198 newborns in Quebec (Canada), 2000–2016.

Mean SD Percentile of distribution IQR
5th 25th 50th 75th 95th
PM2.5 (μg/m3)
 First trimester 8.0 2.7 3.6 6.3 8.1 9.6 12.4 3.3
 Month of conception 7.9 3.2 3.1 5.8 7.7 9.8 13.1 4.0
NO2 (ppb)
 First trimester 11.3 8.6 2.3 4.6 8.74 16.0 28.8 11.4
 Month of conception 11.3 8.8 2.2 4.6 8.6 15.8 29.3 11.2

Note: IQR, interquartile range, NO2, nitrogen dioxide; PM2.5, fine particulate matter of aerodynamic diameter <2.5μm; SD, standard deviation.

For both PM2.5 and NO2, we found no evidence of nonlinearity in the relationship with heart defects (Figure S2 and Table S3), but the association between maternal age and heart defects was nonlinear (Figure S3). Air pollutant exposure in the first trimester was associated with greater odds of heart defects (Table 4). In single-pollutant models, the estimated odds ratio (OR) for an increase of 1 IQR was 1.02 for PM2.5 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.05) and 1.10 for NO2 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.13). Exposures in the month of conception yielded similar results; adjusted ORs were 1.01 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.04) for PM2.5 and 1.10 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.13) for NO2. In two-pollutant models, the association between NO2 and heart defects increased slightly (OR=1.11; 95% CI: 1.08, 1.15), whereas the association for PM2.5 was attenuated (OR=0.98; 95% CI: 0.96, 1.00).

Table 4.

Association of ambient PM2.5 and NO2 in the month of conception and first trimester of pregnancy with risk of any heart defect, Quebec (Canada), 2000–2016.

OR per IQR increment (95% CI)a
PM2.5 NO2
Monthly average in first trimester
 Single-pollutant model 1.02 (1.00, 1.05) 1.10 (1.07, 1.13)
 Two-pollutant model 0.98 (0.95, 1.00) 1.11 (1.08, 1.15)
Monthly average at conception
 Single-pollutant model 1.01 (0.99, 1.04) 1.10 (1.07, 1.13)
 Two-pollutant model 0.98 (0.96, 1.00) 1.11 (1.08, 1.15)

Note: CI, confidence interval; IQR, interquartile range; NO2, nitrogen dioxide; OR, odds ratio; PM2.5, fine particulate matter of aerodynamic diameter <2.5μm.

a

Logistic regression models for 1-IQR change in air pollutant levels, adjusted for maternal age, parity, sex, multiple birth, material deprivation, birth year, rural/urban residence, maternal comorbidity, and season of conception. IQR increments are 3.3μg/m3 for ambient PM2.5 and 11.4 ppb for ambient NO2.

There were in total 1,400 critical and 12,053 noncritical heart defects (Table 5). Exposure to pollutants in the first trimester was associated with noncritical heart defects. Adjusted ORs for noncritical defects were 1.03 per IQR increment in PM2.5 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.05) and 1.11 per IQR increment in NO2 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.14). PM2.5 (OR=1.08; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.14) and NO2 (OR=1.19; 95% CI: 1.12, 1.25) were both associated with the risk of atrial septal defects. However, there was no association with ventricular septal defects. Associations appeared to be present with tetralogy of Fallot for PM2.5 and with coarctation of the aorta for both pollutants, but CIs included the null owing to the small number of cases. Excluding newborns with multiple anomalies did not meaningfully influence associations for noncritical heart defects and coarctation of the aorta, but tetralogy of Fallot no longer appeared associated with air pollution (Table S4).

Table 5.

Association between ambient PM2.5 and NO2 in the first trimester of pregnancy and odds of critical and noncritical heart defects, Quebec (Canada), 2000–2016.

Defects (n) OR per IQR increment (95% CI)a
PM2.5 NO2
Noncritical heart defect
 Any 12,053 1.03 (1.00, 1.05) 1.11 (1.08, 1.14)
 Ventricular septal defect 4,332 0.94 (0.90, 0.98) 1.00 (0.95, 1.05)
 Atrial septal defect 3,136 1.08 (1.03, 1.14) 1.18 (1.12, 1.25)
Critical heart defect
 Any 1,400 1.01 (0.94, 1.09) 0.97 (0.89, 1.06)
 Tetralogy of Fallot 345 1.04 (0.89, 1.22) 0.93 (0.77, 1.11)
 Coarctation of the aorta 343 1.02 (0.87, 1.19) 1.10 (0.92, 1.31)

Note: CI, confidence interval; IQR, interquartile range; NO2, nitrogen dioxide; OR, odds ratio; PM2.5, fine particulate matter of aerodynamic diameter <2.5μm.

a

Single-pollutant logistic regression models for 1-IQR change in air pollutant levels, adjusted for maternal age, parity, sex, multiple birth, material deprivation, birth year, rural/urban residence, maternal comorbidity, and season of conception. IQR increments are 3.3μg/m3 for ambient PM2.5 and 11.4 ppb for ambient NO2.

Assessment of modifying effects of maternal comorbidity revealed significant heterogeneity (Table 6). PM2.5 in the first trimester was associated with an OR of 1.11 for heart defects among mothers with any comorbidity (95% CI: 1.06, 1.17), but an OR of 0.99 among mothers without comorbidity (95% CI: 0.97, 1.02) (Cochran’s Q p<0.001). For NO2, ORs were 1.23 for mothers with comorbidity (95% CI: 1.17, 1.31) and 1.06 for mothers without comorbidity (95% CI: 1.03, 1.09) (Cochran’s Q p<0.001). The association between air pollutants and heart defects was stronger among women with anemia [ORPM2.5=1.21 (95% CI: 1.13, 1.31); ORNO2=1.28 (95% CI: 1.18, 1.38)], epilepsy and mood disorders [ORPM2.5=1.24 (95% CI: 0.95, 1.62); ORNO2=1.54 (95% CI: 1.13, 2.10)], preexisting hypertension [ORPM2.5=1.20 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.41); ORNO2=1.15 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.36)], and preeclampsia [ORPM2.5=1.07 (95% CI: 0.95, 1.19); ORNO2=1.21 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.36)].

Table 6.

Association between exposure to PM2.5 and NO2 in the first trimester of pregnancy and congenital heart defects in 1,342,198 newborns born to women with and without comorbidity in Quebec (Canada), 2000–2016.

Defects (n) PM2.5 NO2
OR per IQR increment (95% CI)a Cochran’s Q p-value OR per IQR increment (95% CI)a Cochran’s Q p-value
Any comorbidity <0.001 <0.001
 Yes 3,013 1.11 (1.06, 1.17) 1.23 (1.17, 1.31)
 No 9,702 0.99 (0.97, 1.02) 1.06 (1.03, 1.09)
Obesity 0.24 0.22
 Yes 417 0.93 (0.81, 1.09) 0.96 (0.78, 1.19)
 No 12,298 1.02 (1.00, 1.05) 1.10 (1.07, 1.13)
Preexisting diabetes (type 1 or 2) 0.61 0.13
 Yes 429 1.05 (0.91, 1.21) 0.97 (0.83, 1.14)
 No 12,286 1.02 (1.00, 1.05) 1.09 (1.06, 1.12)
Preeclampsia 0.38 0.08
 Yes 719 1.07 (0.95, 1.19) 1.21 (1.08, 1.36)
 No 11,996 1.02 (0.99, 1.04) 1.09 (1.06, 1.12)
Preexisting hypertension 0.03 0.48
 Yes 340 1.20 (1.03, 1.41) 1.15 (0.96, 1.36)
 No 12,375 1.01 (0.99, 1.04) 1.09 (1.06, 1.12)
Epilepsy and mood disorders 0.12 0.03
 Yes 119 1.24 (0.95, 1.62) 1.54 (1.13, 2.10)
 No 12,596 1.01 (0.99, 1.04) 1.09 (1.06, 1.12)
Anemia <0.001 <0.001
 Yes 1,476 1.21 (1.13, 1.31) 1.28 (1.18, 1.38)
 No 11,239 0.99 (0.96, 1.02) 1.06 (1.02, 1.09)
Substance use disorder 0.86 0.23
 Yes 273 1.01 (0.85, 1.20) 0.96 (0.77, 1.20)
 No 12,442 1.02 (1.00, 1.05) 1.09 (1.06, 1.13)

Note: CI, confidence interval; IQR, interquartile range; NO2, nitrogen dioxide; OR, odds ratio; PM2.5, fine particulate matter of aerodynamic diameter <2.5μm.

a

Single-pollutant logistic regression model for 1-IQR change in air pollutant levels, adjusted for maternal age, parity, sex, multiple birth, material deprivation, birth year, rural/urban residence, and season of conception. IQR increments are 3.3μg/m3 for ambient PM2.5 and 11.4 ppb for ambient NO2.

Additional subgroup analysis showed positive associations with any heart defect in Montreal [ORPM2.5=1.03 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.09); ORNO2=1.13 (95% CI: 1.06, 1.20)], but no association outside Montreal [ORPM2.5=0.98 (95% CI: 0.95, 1.01); ORNO2=0.97 (95% CI: 0.92, 1.02)] (Table S5). NO2 was more strongly associated with heart defects among women who conceived in the spring.

Discussion

In this population-based cohort, exposure to PM2.5 and NO2 in the first trimester was associated with the risk of noncritical heart defects, particularly atrial septal defects. There was evidence of a possible association with critical heart defects, including coarctation of the aorta, although the prevalence of these anomalies was low. The association with heart defects was greater in women with comorbidity. Women with anemia who were exposed to higher levels of pollution were more likely to have fetal heart defects. Women with epilepsy or mood disorders, hypertensive disorders, and preeclampsia who were exposed to pollution also tended to have a greater risk of fetal heart defects, although power was limited for these comorbidities. This study suggests that prenatal exposure to air pollution may increase the risk of noncritical heart defects, particularly in susceptible women.

The mechanisms by which air pollution may lead to heart defects have yet to be established. Congenital heart defects arise in the first trimester during migration and differentiation of neural crest cells, and septation of the primordial heart into the atrial and ventricular compartments.46 Because cardiogenesis begins shortly after conception, with the heart continuing to form throughout the first trimester, exposures that affect cardiac development in the first trimester may be more important than exposures at conception alone. In particular, first trimester exposures that interrupt septation may result in incomplete or partial closure of the primary atrial foramen or secondary atrial septum, leading to atrial septal defects.27 Ventricular septal defects may develop following disruption in transcription of genes that code for growth factors involved in forming the outflow tract and atrioventricular canal.46 Pollutants may interfere in cardiogenesis by causing placental inflammation and oxidative stress, and generating reactive oxygen and nitrogen species that alter DNA and mRNA expression.47 Another hypothesis is that air pollutants impede the normal migration of neural crest cells into the heart.43 Epigenetic mechanisms are also thought to be involved.47

However, epidemiological studies of heart defects have provided only mixed support for these pathways, in addition to being limited in number and lacking power. In the largest review and meta-analysis of air pollution and congenital heart defects, NO2 and PM2.5 exposures were not associated with atrial septal defects16; meta-estimates of associations were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.90, 1.06) per 10-ppb increase in NO2 and 1.08 (95% CI: 0.87, 1.34) per 10-μg/m3 increase in PM2.5. These meta-estimates derived from positive associations reported in 49,4850 of 10 studies69,11,32,4851 for NO2, and in 37,9,52 of 5 studies7,9,11,32,52 for PM2.5. In our analysis, both PM2.5 and NO2 were associated with a greater risk of atrial septal defects at term. A potential source of heterogeneity in findings could relate to the process of cardiogenesis. The atrium starts forming in the fifth gestational week and continues to mature in the second and third trimesters before closing.27 In preterm infants, atrial septal defects are due to physiological immaturity and are not pathological.53 Preterm atrial septal defects were excluded from our analyses; however, to our knowledge, previous studies included preterm births.

For ventricular septal defects, our findings showed null or negative associations, which is consistent with most previous studies.7,11,14,32,50,51 In one meta-analysis, the pooled effect estimates were 1.04 (95% CI: 0.87, 1.25; n=5 studies) for a 10-μg/m3 increase in PM2.5 and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.91, 1.44; n=11 studies) for a 10-ppb increase in NO2.16 Although restriction to live-born infants could explain the absent or inverse association we found with ventricular septal defects, a large numbers of terminations would need to be missing differentially in terms of exposure to induce a sufficiently large bias.35,54 Moreover, adjustment for maternal comorbidities and other covariates that are common causes of heart defects and fetal loss may have helped minimize live-birth bias.35,36

Analyses of critical heart defects suggest that PM2.5 and NO2 may increase the risk of tetralogy of Fallot and coarctation of the aorta. Despite having more cases than in any previous studies, prevalence of these anomalies remained low, resulting in wider CIs. A meta-analysis appears to support the possibility that NO2 exposure increases the risk of tetralogy of Fallot (pooled OR=1.11; 95% CI: 0.95, 1.30) and coarctation of the aorta (pooled OR=1.12; 95% CI: 0.99, 1.18).16 However, individual studies have provided inconsistent results in terms of direction of the association. For PM2.5, positive associations with tetralogy of Fallot have been reported in most studies,7,9,11,13 resulting in a meta-estimate of 1.12 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.28) per 10-μg/m3 increment in PM2.5.16

The modifying role of maternal comorbidity remains poorly understood. Prior studies have paid limited attention to comorbidity. In China, an analysis of 61,884 women exposed to NO2 suggested that risks of heart defects were greater in women with higher prepregnancy body mass index, diabetes, or thyroid disease.40 Our analysis of >1.3 million women with 12,700 heart defects indicates that comorbidity may be a modifier. PM2.5 and NO2 had a greater association with heart defects in children born to women with anemia, epilepsy and mood disorders, preeclampsia, and preexisting hypertension. Associations with heart defects were most prominent for anemia, a hematologic disorder closely linked with cardiac development. Embryonic hypoxia due to anemia is associated with abnormal angiogenesis, placental oxidative stress, and inflammation through reactive oxygen species.55 Reduced iron intake is associated with increased risk of congenital heart defects in pregnant women, and NO2 and PM2.5 are associated with anemia in adults.56,57 Similarly, preeclampsia and hypertension may lead to endothelial dysfunction that modifies the impact of pollutants on the developing heart.55 Maternal hypertension is associated with uteroplacental insufficiency, fetal cardiac vascular dysfunction, and cell death, which are common mechanisms linking pollution with heart defects.37,47 Both preeclampsia and hypertension are associated with an increased risk of heart defects.37,38 Patients with epilepsy and psychiatric disorders may be susceptible given that they may be treated with medications that are potentially teratogenic.58

In general, NO2 was more strongly associated with heart defects than PM2.5. NO2 is mainly emitted by road traffic and industrial burning and is a marker of traffic pollution in urban areas.59 In contrast, ambient PM2.5 is a heterogenous mixture that may make associations with heart defects harder to detect. Nevertheless, both pollutants were more strongly associated with heart defects in Montreal, where road traffic is greater. Associations may be attenuated in rural areas where postal codes are larger, thus contributing to exposure misclassification.

Most prior studies used routine fixed monitoring stations to assign exposures based on the nearest monitor6,8,13,14,33,48,49 or the average (or distance-weighted average) of measurements at multiple stations in the study area or within a subjectively defined cutoff distance from the residence.3,15,32,50 Monitoring sites could be as far as 30 or 50km from the residence.3,50 These exposure assessment methods do not adequately capture spatial variation in PM2.5 and NO2 concentrations, causing considerable exposure misclassification for spatially heterogenous pollutants such as NO2. In contrast, we used air pollution exposure estimates that captured both spatial and temporal variation.

We had high coverage of heart defects, but did not include stillbirths, and did not have data for miscarriages, terminations, and stillbirths, or heart defects detected later in childhood. There may be uncertainty in conception dates, but analyses of correlated windows of exposure yielded similar results. We had monthly exposure data and thus could not assess exposures specifically between weeks 3 and 8 of gestation, the period when heart defects form. However, we do not expect an influence on estimated associations given that exposures during the month of conception and first trimester were strongly correlated and yielded similar estimates of association. We could not account for movement or activity patterns that may attenuate estimates.60 We adjusted for a number of risk factors, but cannot rule out residual confounding from unmeasured risk factors, such as family history, or pharmacotherapy.

In this large population-based cohort study, maternal exposure to PM2.5 and NO2 in the first trimester was associated with an increased risk of noncritical heart defects, particularly atrial septal defects. Mothers with comorbidities, particularly anemia, epilepsy and mood disorders, preeclampsia, and preexisting hypertension were more susceptible. Further studies addressing the role of maternal comorbidity are needed to consolidate our findings. Future work should also aim to establish critical windows of exposure and the exact pathways affecting fetal heart development.

Supplementary Material

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (PJT-162300 to N.A.), Public Health Agency of Canada (6D02363004 to N.A.), and Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé (296785 to N.A.).

Ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) estimates indexed to DMTI Spatial Inc. postal codes were provided by the Canadian Urban Environmental Health Research Consortium (CANUE).

References

  • 1.van der Linde D, Konings EEM, Slager MA, Witsenburg M, Helbing WA, Takkenberg JJM, et al. 2011. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(21):2241–2247, PMID: , 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). 2020. Congenital Heart Defects (CHDs) Data & Statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/heartdefects/data.html [accessed 15 February 2022].
  • 3.Padula AM, Tager IB, Carmichael SL, Hammond SK, Yang W, Lurmann F, et al. 2013. Ambient air pollution and traffic exposures and congenital heart defects in the San Joaquin Valley of California. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 27(4):329–339, PMID: , 10.1111/ppe.12055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Patel SS, Burns TL. 2013. Nongenetic risk factors and congenital heart defects. Pediatr Cardiol 34(7):1535–1555, PMID: , 10.1007/s00246-013-0775-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.WHO (World Health Organization). 2020. Congenital anomalies. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/congenital-anomalies [accessed 15 February 2022].
  • 6.Dadvand P, Rankin J, Rushton S, Pless-Mulloli T. 2011. Ambient air pollution and congenital heart disease: a register-based study. Environ Res 111(3):435–441, PMID: , 10.1016/j.envres.2011.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Huang CC, Chen BY, Pan SC, Ho YL, Guo YL. 2019. Prenatal exposure to PM2.5 and congenital heart diseases in Taiwan. Sci Total Environ 655:880–886, PMID: , 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hwang BF, Lee YL, Jaakkola JJK. 2015. Air pollution and the risk of cardiac defects: a population-based case-control study. Medicine (Baltimore) 94(44):e1883, PMID: , 10.1097/MD.0000000000001883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lavigne E, Lima I, Hatzopoulou M, Van Ryswyk K, Decou ML, Luo W, et al. 2019. Spatial variations in ambient ultrafine particle concentrations and risk of congenital heart defects. Environ Int 130:104953, PMID: , 10.1016/j.envint.2019.104953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ren Z, Zhu J, Gao Y, Yin Q, Hu M, Dai L, et al. 2018. Maternal exposure to ambient PM10 during pregnancy increases the risk of congenital heart defects: evidence from machine learning models. Sci Total Environ 630:1–10, PMID: , 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schembari A, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Salvador J, de Nazelle A, Cirach M, Dadvand P, et al. 2014. Traffic-related air pollution and congenital anomalies in Barcelona. Environ Health Perspect 122(3):317–323, PMID: , 10.1289/ehp.1306802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stingone JA, Luben TJ, Daniels JL, Fuentes M, Richardson DB, Aylsworth AS, et al. 2014. Maternal exposure to criteria air pollutants and congenital heart defects in offspring: results from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Environ Health Perspect 122(8):863–872, PMID: , 10.1289/ehp.1307289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhang B, Liang S, Zhao J, Qian Z, Bassig BA, Yang R, et al. 2016. Maternal exposure to air pollutant PM2.5 and PM10 during pregnancy and risk of congenital heart defects. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 26(4):422–427, PMID: , 10.1038/jes.2016.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhang B, Zhao J, Yang R, Qian Z, Liang S, Bassig BA, et al. 2016. Ozone and other air pollutants and the risk of congenital heart defects. Sci Rep 6:34852, PMID: , 10.1038/srep34852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang Q, Sun S, Sui X, Ding L, Yang M, Li C, et al. 2021. Associations between weekly air pollution exposure and congenital heart disease. Sci Total Environ 757:143821, PMID: , 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hu CY, Huang K, Fang Y, Yang XJ, Ding K, Jiang W, et al. 2020. Maternal air pollution exposure and congenital heart defects in offspring: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chemosphere 253:126668, PMID: , 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ravindra K, Chanana N, Mor S. 2021. Exposure to air pollutants and risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Sci Total Environ 765:142772, PMID: , 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vrijheid M, Martinez D, Manzanares S, Dadvand P, Schembari A, Rankin J, et al. 2011. Ambient air pollution and risk of congenital anomalies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect 119(5):598–606, PMID: , 10.1289/ehp.1002946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ministry of Health and Social Services. 2021. Med-Echo System Normative Framework—Maintenance and Use of Data for the Study of Hospital Clientele. Quebec, Quebec, Canada: Government of Quebec. https://publications.msss.gouv.qc.ca/msss/fichiers/2000/00-601_modif2021.pdf [accessed 15 February 2022]. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. 2022. Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans—TCPS2 (2022). https://ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique_tcps2-eptc2_2022.html [accessed 15 February 2022].
  • 21.WHO. 1978. International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Basic Tabulation List with Alphabetic Index. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/39473 [accessed 15 February 2022].
  • 22.WHO. 2016. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision. http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2016/en [accessed 15 February 2022].
  • 23.Statistics Canada, Health Division. 1986. Canadian Classification of Diagnostic, Therapeutic, and Surgical Procedures. https://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/9.844913/publication.html [accessed 15 February 2022].
  • 24.Canadian Institute for Health Information. 2022. Canadian Classification of Health Interventions (CCI). Alphabetical Index and Tabular List. https://secure.cihi.ca/estore/productSeries.htm?pc=PCC1860 [accessed 15 February 2022].
  • 25.Auger N, Bilodeau-Bertrand M, Tith RM, Arbour L. 2019. Bariatric surgery and the risk of congenital anomalies in subsequent pregnancies. Am J Clin Nutr 110(5):1168–1174, PMID: , 10.1093/ajcn/nqz195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mahle WT, Newburger JW, Matherne GP, Smith FC, Hoke TR, Koppel R, et al. 2009. Role of pulse oximetry in examining newborns for congenital heart disease: a scientific statement from the AHA and AAP. Pediatrics 124(2):823–836, PMID: , 10.1542/peds.2009-1397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Moore KL, Persaud TVN, Shiota K. 2000. Color Atlas of Clinical Embryology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hystad P, Villeneuve PJ, Goldberg MS, Crouse DL, Johnson K, Canadian Cancer Registries Epidemiology Research Group. 2015. Exposure to traffic-related air pollution and the risk of developing breast cancer among women in eight Canadian provinces: a case–control study. Environ Int 74:240–248, PMID: , 10.1016/j.envint.2014.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.van Donkelaar A, Martin RV, Li C, Burnett RT. 2019. Regional estimates of chemical composition of fine particulate matter using a combined geoscience-statistical method with information from satellites, models, and monitors. Environ Sci Technol 53(5):2595–2611, PMID: , 10.1021/acs.est.8b06392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Brook JR, Setton EM, Seed E, Shooshtari M, Doiron D, CANUE—the Canadian Urban Environmental Health Research Consortium. 2018. The Canadian Urban Environmental Health Research Consortium—a protocol for building a national environmental exposure data platform for integrated analyses of urban form and health. BMC Public Health 18(1):114, PMID: , 10.1186/s12889-017-5001-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.DMTI Spatial Inc. 2015. CanMap Postal Code Suite v2015.3. [Computer file.] Markham: DMTI Spatial Inc. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Agay-Shay K, Friger M, Linn S, Peled A, Amitai Y, Peretz C, et al. 2013. Air pollution and congenital heart defects. Environ Res 124:28–34, PMID: , 10.1016/j.envres.2013.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ritz B, Yu F, Fruin S, Chapa G, Shaw GM, Harris JA, et al. 2002. Ambient air pollution and risk of birth defects in southern California. Am J Epidemiol 155(1):17–25, PMID: , 10.1093/aje/155.1.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pampalon R, Hamel D, Gamache P, Philibert MD, Raymond G, Simpson A, et al. 2012. An area-based material and social deprivation index for public health in Québec and Canada. Can J Public Health 103(8 suppl 2):S17–S22, PMID: , 10.1007/BF03403824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Liew Z, Olsen J, Cui X, Ritz B, Arah OA. 2015. Bias from conditioning on live birth in pregnancy cohorts: an illustration based on neurodevelopment in children after prenatal exposure to organic pollutants. Int J Epidemiol 44(1):345–354, PMID: , 10.1093/ije/dyu249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Neophytou AM, Kioumourtzoglou MA, Goin DE, Darwin KC, Casey JA. 2021. Educational note: addressing special cases of bias that frequently occur in perinatal epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 50(1):337–345, PMID: , 10.1093/ije/dyaa252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ramakrishnan A, Lee LJ, Mitchell LE, Agopian AJ. 2015. Maternal hypertension during pregnancy and the risk of congenital heart defects in offspring: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Cardiol 36(7):1442–1451, PMID: , 10.1007/s00246-015-1182-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Auger N, Fraser WD, Healy-Profitós J, Arbour L. 2015. Association between preeclampsia and congenital heart defects. JAMA 314(15):1588–1598, PMID: , 10.1001/jama.2015.12505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lavigne E, Yasseen AS III, Stieb DM, Hystad P, van Donkelaar A, Martin RV, et al. 2016. Ambient air pollution and adverse birth outcomes: differences by maternal comorbidities. Environ Res 148:457–466, PMID: , 10.1016/j.envres.2016.04.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yang Y, Lin Q, Liang Y, Ruan Z, Acharya BK, Zhang S, et al. 2020. Maternal air pollution exposure associated with risk of congenital heart defect in pre-pregnancy overweighted women. Sci Total Environ 712:136470, PMID: , 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kaufman JS, MacLehose RF. 2013. Which of these things is not like the others? Cancer 119(24):4216–4222, PMID: , 10.1002/cncr.28359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Auger N, Fraser WD, Sauve R, Bilodeau-Bertrand M, Kosatsky T. 2017. Risk of congenital heart defects after ambient heat exposure early in pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect 125(1):8–14, PMID: , 10.1289/EHP171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Agay-Shay K, Friger M, Linn S, Peled A, Amitai Y, Peretz C, et al. 2013. Ambient temperature and congenital heart defects. Hum Reprod 28(8):2289–2297, PMID: , 10.1093/humrep/det244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lin S, Lin Z, Ou Y, Soim A, Shrestha S, Lu Y, et al. 2018. Maternal ambient heat exposure during early pregnancy in summer and spring and congenital heart defects—a large US population-based, case-control study. Environ Int 118:211–221, PMID: , 10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Xia YQ, Zhao KN, Zhao AD, Zhu JZ, Hong HF, Wang YL, et al. 2019. Associations of maternal upper respiratory tract infection/influenza during early pregnancy with congenital heart disease in offspring: evidence from a case-control study and meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 19(1):277, PMID: , 10.1186/s12872-019-1206-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Bartelings MM, Deruiter MC, Poelmann RE. 2005. Basics of cardiac development for the understanding of congenital heart malformations. Pediatr Res 57(2):169–176, PMID: , 10.1203/01.PDR.0000148710.69159.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mazzoli-Rocha F, Fernandes S, Einicker-Lamas M, Zin WA. 2010. Roles of oxidative stress in signaling and inflammation induced by particulate matter. Cell Biol Toxicol 26(5):481–498, PMID: , 10.1007/s10565-010-9158-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gilboa SM, Mendola P, Olshan AF, Langlois PH, Savitz DA, Loomis D, et al. 2005. Relation between ambient air quality and selected birth defects, seven county study, Texas, 1997–2000. Am J Epidemiol 162(3):238–252, PMID: , 10.1093/aje/kwi189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Strickland MJ, Klein M, Correa A, Reller MD, Mahle WT, Riehle-Colarusso TJ, et al. 2009. Ambient air pollution and cardiovascular malformations in Atlanta, Georgia, 1986–2003. Am J Epidemiol 169(8):1004–1014, PMID: , 10.1093/aje/kwp011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hansen CA, Barnett AG, Jalaludin BB, Morgan GG. 2009. Ambient air pollution and birth defects in Brisbane, Australia. PLoS One 4(4):e5408, PMID: , 10.1371/journal.pone.0005408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Pedersen M, Garne E, Hansen-Nord N, Hjortebjerg D, Ketzel M, Raaschou-Nielsen O, et al. 2017. Exposure to air pollution and noise from road traffic and risk of congenital anomalies in the Danish National Birth Cohort. Environ Res 159:39–45, PMID: , 10.1016/j.envres.2017.07.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Girguis MS, Strickland MJ, Hu X, Liu Y, Bartell SM, Vieira VM, et al. 2016. Maternal exposure to traffic-related air pollution and birth defects in Massachusetts. Environ Res 146:1–9, PMID: , 10.1016/j.envres.2015.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Garne E. 2006. Atrial and ventricular septal defects—epidemiology and spontaneous closure. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 19(5):271–276, PMID: , 10.1080/14767050500433817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Heinke D, Rich-Edwards JW, Williams PL, Hernandez-Diaz S, Anderka M, Fisher SC, et al. 2020. Quantification of selection bias in studies of risk factors for birth defects among live births. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 34(6):655–664, PMID: , 10.1111/ppe.12650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sliwa K, Mebazaa A. 2014. Possible joint pathways of early pre-eclampsia and congenital heart defects via angiogenic imbalance and potential evidence for cardio-placental syndrome. Eur Heart J 35(11):680–682, PMID: , 10.1093/eurheartj/eht485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Elbarbary M, Honda T, Morgan G, Guo Y, Guo Y, Kowal P, et al. 2020. Ambient air pollution exposure association with anaemia prevalence and haemoglobin levels in Chinese older adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(9):3209, PMID: , 10.3390/ijerph17093209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Yang J, Kang Y, Cheng Y, Zeng L, Shen Y, Shi G, et al. 2020. Iron intake and iron status during pregnancy and risk of congenital heart defects: a case-control study. Int J Cardiol 301:74–79, PMID: , 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.11.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Etemad L, Moshiri M, Moallem SA. 2012. Epilepsy drugs and effects on fetal development: potential mechanisms. J Res Med Sci 17(9):876–881, PMID: . [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bourdrel T, Bind MA, Béjot Y, Morel O, Argacha JF. 2017. Cardiovascular effects of air pollution. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 110(11):634–642, PMID: , 10.1016/j.acvd.2017.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ritz B, Wilhelm M, Hoggatt KJ, Ghosh JKC. 2007. Ambient air pollution and preterm birth in the environment and pregnancy outcomes study at the University of California, Los Angeles. Am J Epidemiol 166(9):1045–1052, PMID: , 10.1093/aje/kwm181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES