Abstract
Photoactivatable protecting groups (PPGs) have become powerful materials for controlling the activity of biologically important molecules in the biomedical field. However, designing PPGs that can be efficiently activated by biologically benign visible and NIR light with fluorescence monitoring is still a great challenge. Herein, we report o-hydroxycinnamate-based PPGs that can be activated by both visible (one-photon) and NIR (two-photon) light for controlled drug release with real-time monitoring. Thus, a photoremovable 7-diethylamino o-hydroxycinnamate group is covalently attached to an anticancer drug, gemcitabine, to establish a photoactivatable prodrug system. Upon excitation by visible (400–700 nm) or NIR (800 nm) light, the prodrug efficiently releases drug which is quantified by monitoring the formation of a strongly fluorescent coumarin reporter. The prodrug is taken up by the cancer cells and interestingly accumulates within mitochondria as determined by FACS and fluorescence microscopy imaging. Further, the prodrug demonstrates photo-triggered, dose-dependent, and temporally controlled cell death upon irradiation with both visible and NIR light. This photoactivatable system could be useful and adapted in the future for the development of advanced therapies in biomedicine.
We report a photoactivatable o-hydroxycinnamate–gemcitabine prodrug that shows an efficient drug release with real-time monitoring, and dose- and temporally-controlled photocytotoxicity upon visible (one-photon) or NIR (two-photon) light irradiation.
Introduction
Controlling the activity of biologically important compounds with light is a constantly growing concern and has gained immense interest in chemical biology and medicinal chemistry.1–4 Light has the power to manipulate biological processes in living systems with high spatial and temporal precision. In this regard, photolabile (also commonly termed as photoactivatable, photoremovable, photoreleasable, or photocleavable) protecting groups (PPGs) or photocaged compounds (PCs) have received enormous attention for the controlled release of biological effector molecules to induce biochemical function.6–11 These compounds can be conjugated with effector molecules to mask their biological functions. The biological activities of such molecules can be restored upon removal of these photoactivatable groups by irradiation with a suitable wavelength of light. To date, various PPGs or PCs have been developed based on o-nitrobenzyl,7–14 coumarinyl,5,7–11,15–17 anthracenyl,7–10,18,19 quinolinyl,7–10,20,21p-hydroxyphenacyl,7–10,22o-hydroxycinnamate,8–10,23–27 rhodamine,10,28 cyanine,8,10,11,29 BODIPY,8,10,11,30etc. These compounds are successfully used for non-invasive spatiotemporal control over the release of biologically important compounds such as anticancer agents, antibiotics, biomolecules, neurotransmitters, fragrances, fluorescent probes, etc. However, most of these PPGs or PCs require high-energy UV light for their removal, which limits their biological and medical applications, since UV light is harmful to biomatter and has a quite narrow penetration potential in human tissues.8,10,16,23 Therefore, the development of new PPGs that can be efficiently activated by biologically and chemically benign visible and near-infrared (NIR) light is highly desired to achieve deeper tissue penetration and to diminish phototoxicity.
In recent years, o-hydroxycinnamate (oHC)-based photocaged systems have received ample attention because of their (i) ease of synthesis, (ii) clean and rapid photo-uncaging capability, (iii) applicability for two-photon uncaging efficiencies by NIR light irradiation, (iv) facile conjugation with alcohols and amines without forming a carbonate bond, which is highly labile in physiological conditions, and (v) resulting photoproduct coumarin derivatives which are strongly fluorescent that served as a fluorescent reporter for the real-time monitoring of the release of substrates.23,26 The photo-uncaging capabilities of the oHC systems were first described by Porter et al. to accomplish photochemical activation of serine proteinase enzymes.24,31,32 Jullien et al. have utilized the photo-triggering ability of oHC for the release of caged substrates such as alcohol in real-time by monitoring the formation of fluorescent coumarin reporter by irradiation with two-photon light.25,33,34 Singh and co-workers have developed a fluorescent version of oHC by attaching it to an excited-state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) moiety to achieve image-guided delivery of the caged substrate in biological systems and also to monitor the photo-triggered release of the caged substrate in real-time.26 Recently, this group has demonstrated another efficient photoactivatable system based on a carbazole-fused oHC platform for the dual uncaging of alcohols (same or different) upon one- and two-photon irradiation with real-time monitoring capability.35 Zhang and Wang's group first demonstrated temporally controlled anticancer drug release using an oHC system where the drug release was sequentially triggered by internal stimulus with nitroreductase followed by external stimulus with UV light.36 However, the above system releases drug upon UV light irradiation which is not suitable for therapeutic applications. To address this, recently our group has made an effort to develop an organelle-targeted oHC-based photoactivatable drug delivery system, wherein the drug release was achieved by both UV (one-photon) or biologically benign NIR (two-photon) light irradiation with fluorescence monitoring.37 Although this system can be activated by NIR light, poor drug release capability (32% drug release after 22 min irradiation) was observed that results in lower photocytotoxicity. Moreover, the released coumarin product is inapplicable for in vivo bioimaging since it emits at the UV region (λem = 385 nm). Hence, the design of new oHC-based photoactivatable prodrug systems that can be efficiently activated by NIR light and are capable of performing real-time bioimaging in the visible region along with high NIR photocytotoxicity is highly desirable for potential biomedical applications.
In this study, we have designed a photoactivatable oHC prodrug which showed efficient and temporally controlled drug release upon visible and NIR light irradiation (Scheme 1). In our design strategy, the photoactivatable oHC was conjugated with an anticancer drug, gemcitabine (GMC), to establish the oHC-GMC prodrug. The prodrug was efficiently activated by both visible (400–700 nm) and NIR (800 nm) light, showing drug release of 89% and 77% with 20 min and 11 min irradiation, respectively. The release of drug can be monitored by the formation of the strongly fluorescent coumarin reporter that emits at the visible region which is appropriate for bioimaging applications (λem = 475 nm). Interestingly, our oHC-GMC prodrug preferentially internalized in the mitochondria of cancer cells and demonstrated light-triggered temporally controlled drug release which can be observed by fluorescence microscopy imaging. Further, the prodrug exhibited dose-dependent and temporally controlled cell death upon irradiation with visible or NIR light, while negligible cell death was observed in the absence of light.
Scheme 1. Previous work37 and current study on a photoactivatable o-hydroxycinnamate-doxorubicin/gemcitabine (oHC-DOX/GMC) prodrug which upon irradiation with UV/visible (one-photon) or NIR (two-photon) light releases anticancer drug (DOX/GMC) with real-time monitoring by the formation of fluorescent coumarin reporter in living cells.
Results and discussion
Synthesis and photophysical properties of oHC-GMC
In order to achieve efficient drug release under visible and NIR light, we have synthesized a photoactivatable oHC-based prodrug system. For this, the photoremovable 4-(diethylamino)-2-hydroxycinnamic acid (oHC) was covalently conjugated with a model anticancer drug gemcitabine (GMC) to establish oHC-GMC (Scheme 2). Briefly, commercially available 4-(diethylamino)-2-hydroxybenzaldehyde was reacted with carboethoxymethylidenetriphenylphosphorane by the Wittig reaction to obtain the photoactivatable 4-(diethylamino)-2-hydroxy-trans-cinnamic ester (1) and its subsequent hydrolysis yielded 4-(diethylamino)-2-hydroxy-trans-cinnamic acid (2). An EDC/HOBt coupling of the carboxylic acid group of compound 2 with GMC provided a photoactivatable oHC-GMC prodrug. All the compounds were synthesized in a straightforward way and were easy to purify.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of o-hydroxycinnamate–gemcitabine (oHC-GMC) prodrug.
The photophysical properties of compound 2 and oHC-GMC were studied in 10% DMSO in phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH 7.3). Compound 2 showed absorption bands at 263 nm and 359 nm, while oHC-GMC showed bands at 266 nm and 380 nm (Fig. 1, S1 and Table S1†). The shifting of the band from 359 nm in 2 to 380 nm in oHC-GMC suggested the conjugation of compound 2 to GMC. The absorption band that appeared at 380 nm in oHC-GMC was used for photoexcitation. Notably, the tail of this absorption band extends beyond 500 nm into the visible region which has been utilized for its photoexcitation by visible light. Interestingly, the photoproduct coumarin compound of oHC-GMC exhibited an emission at 475 nm which is appropriate for bioimaging applications as compared to that in a previous report with an emission of 385 nm (ref. 37) (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1. Absorbance spectrum (black) of the lowest-energy absorption band of oHC-GMC (10 μM) and emission spectrum (red) for the photoproduct coumarin compound of oHC-GMC (50 μM) in 1 : 9 DMSO and phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH 7.3) at 25 °C. The emission spectrum was recorded at an excitation wavelength of 385 nm (λem = 475 nm).
Photo-triggered drug release properties of oHC-GMC
The photo-triggered drug (GMC) release by oHC-GMC was studied by spectroscopic techniques such as absorption and emission spectroscopy and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). For this, oHC-GMC solution was irradiated with visible light (400–700 nm, 11 mW) for 0–20 min and the release of GMC was monitored by absorption spectroscopy. The absorbance of oHC-GMC was found to gradually decrease with increasing photoirradiation time and become saturated after 20 min (Fig. 2a). Further, the drug release by oHC-GMC was also examined by emission spectroscopy by recording the emission spectra of the coumarin reporter (λex = 385 nm) after irradiation with visible light for 0–20 min (see Scheme 1 and Fig. 2b and c). The results showed that the emission intensity of coumarin reporter at 475 nm gradually increased and was eventually saturated at 20 min photoirradiation. The drug release determined by emission spectroscopy upon photoirradiation was found to be 89%. However, there was no change in emission spectra observed without photoirradiation, suggesting that the coumarin product was not formed, which implied no drug release. Hence, our photo-triggered oHC-GMC system showed controlled drug release with real-time monitoring by measuring the fluorescence intensity of the formed coumarin product. In addition, the drug release was also evaluated by monitoring the photochemical conversion from oHC-GMC to GMC using RP-HPLC (Fig. 2d and e). Before photoirradiation, a single peak of oHC-GMC was observed in the HPLC chromatogram at a retention time of 3.7 min. However, the intensity of the peak at 3.7 min gradually decreased upon photoirradiation, whereas a new peak was developed at 8.9 min corresponding to GMC. The HPLC results suggested 78% conversion of oHC-GMC to GMC upon 20 min exposure to visible light. In general, the oHC-GMC prodrug undergoes trans-to-cis photoisomerization followed by lactonization to form a fluorescent coumarin product, thereby facilitating the release of GMC.23,33,37
Fig. 2. (a) Absorption and (b) emission spectra of oHC-GMC in 1 : 9 DMSO/PBS (100 mM, pH 7.3) upon irradiation with visible light (400–700 nm, 11 mW) at 25 °C. Each time the sample was exposed to light for 2 min before measuring the absorption and emission spectra. The emission (λex = 385 nm) spectra of oHC-GMC before (red line) and after 20 min irradiation (black line) are highlighted. (c) Kinetic curve at λem 475 nm for the release of GMC from oHC-GMC in the dark (■) or under light (
) irradiation. (d) HPLC monitoring of the progress of the release of GMC from oHC-GMC in 1 : 9 MeCN/PBS (100 mM, pH 7.3) under visible light (400–700 nm, 11 mW) irradiation at 25 °C. (e) Quantitative monitoring of the conversion of oHC-GMC (50 μM) to GMC in 1 : 9 MeCN/PBS (100 mM, pH 7.3) at 25 °C under visible light irradiation.
Next, we determined the uncaging quantum yields of oHC-GMC upon irradiation with visible light. The uncaging quantum yield (Φu) of E-to-Z photoisomerization of oHC-GMC after one-photon excitation with visible light was determined to be 0.028 (±0.007%), which is comparable to that of other reported oHC-based systems wherein the photo-uncaging studies were performed under UV light (Table S1†).33–35
We also investigated the effect of pH on the drug release profile from oHC-GMC after irradiation with visible light in order to determine its potential application in biological medium (Fig. S2†). Thus, drug release studies were carried out over a wide pH range of 4–9 and the release of GMC was determined by measuring the fluorescence intensity of coumarin product after photoirradiation. It was observed that the drug release is pH-dependent, which increased with the increase in pH. The maximum drug release was determined between pH 7 and 9. In contrast, very little drug release was observed under acidic conditions at pH 4, which is in accordance with the literature.27 Hence, our oHC-GMC system is suitable for drug release studies under physiological pH conditions (pH 7.3), where the drug release was found to be maximum.
Cellular uptake and photo-triggered in vitro drug release of oHC-GMC
Before determining the cellular uptake, the lipophilicity (log Po/w) of oHC-GMC was determined by measuring its partition coefficient in an n-octanol/water system.37,38 The log Po/w value of oHC-GMC was found to be 2.1, suggesting its moderately lipophilic nature (Table S1†). Then, we investigated the uptake of oHC-GMC in human lung carcinoma (A549) cells at different time points using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis (Fig. 3a). The maximum uptake of prodrug was found at 1 h.
Fig. 3. (a) Uptake of oHC-GMC (10 μM) in A549 cells at different incubation time points (30 min, 1 h, and 2 h) determined by FACS analysis. The control represents untreated cells. (b) Monitoring the intracellular drug release by oHC-GMC (10 μM) in A549 cells upon photoexposure to visible light (400–700 nm, 11 mW) for different time points by measuring the blue fluorescence intensity of the photoproduct coumarin compound determined by fluorescence microscopy imaging. Scale bar = 20 μm. (c) The graph represents the drug release as a function of irradiation time from oHC-GMC (10 μM) in A549 cells by measuring the fluorescence intensity of the photoproduct coumarin corresponding to the fluorescence images shown in (b).
Next, we evaluated and monitored the photo-triggered drug release by oHC-GMC in cancer cells by fluorescence microscopy imaging (Fig. 3b). For this, the cultured A549 cells were incubated with 10 μM concentration of oHC-GMC at 37 °C for 1 h, washed with PBS followed by irradiation with visible light (400–700 nm, 11 mW) for 0, 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 min and further incubated at 37 °C for 10 min before fluorescence imaging. Upon irradiation with light for 2 min, a very weak blue fluorescence was developed and the intensity of the blue fluorescence increased with increasing exposure time (Fig. 3c). These results indicated that the drug release can be modulated by varying the exposure time to light that can be simply monitored by measuring the fluorescence intensity of the coumarin reporter in living cells, providing real-time monitoring of temporally controlled drug release.
Subcellular localization studies
To investigate the subcellular localization of oHC-GMC, we performed a co-localization study using organelle staining dye by fluorescence microscopy imaging. Accordingly, the cells were incubated with oHC-GMC (10 μM) and then irradiated with visible light for 10 min, followed by incubation with mitochondrial (Mito Red, 100 nM) staining dye (Fig. 4a). The overlap of the blue fluorescence intensity of the photoproduct coumarin reporter (Fig. 4a(A)) with the red fluorescence of Mito Red dye (Fig. 4a(B)) appeared as a pink color (Fig. 4a(C)). Further, the degree of co-localization was also determined using a scatter plot which showed 59% overlap of the blue and red signals (Fig. 4a(D)). The results suggested that the released photoproduct fluorescent coumarin reporter, i.e., 7-diethylamino coumarin (see Scheme 1), accumulated in the mitochondria of cancer cells, which is well supported by literature reports.39,40 However, we cannot conclude that the photo-uncaging reaction or the coumarin release took place in the mitochondria. The photo-uncaging can occur within the cytoplasm followed by the diffusion of the photoproduct coumarin compound to the mitochondria. In order to examine whether the photo-uncaging reaction happened within the mitochondria, we checked the subcellular localization of the oHC-GMC prodrug in the cells prior to photoirradiation. The accumulation of prodrug within mitochondria will lead to a change in the mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), designated by ΔΨm. To determine the change in the MMP, we used JC-1, a membrane-permeable mitochondria-selective dye which emits red and green fluorescence in its aggregate and monomeric states, respectively.41 In a healthy polarized mitochondrion having high membrane potentials, JC-1 exists in the form of J-aggregates and emits red fluorescence, whereas in a depolarized mitochondrion having low membrane potentials, JC-1 exists in the form of a J-monomer and emits green fluorescence. The ratio of red to green fluorescence of JC-1 is frequently employed for detecting the change in the MMP. Thus, we monitored the change in ΔΨm by measuring the fluorescence of JC-1 (red)/JC-1 (green) upon treatment of A549 cells with oHC-GMC (10 μM) prodrug by FACS analysis (Fig. 4b). The control cells exhibited red fluorescence, indicating that the mitochondrial membrane retains a high potential. In contrast, the cells treated with oHC-GMC showed a marked decrease in ΔΨm, as evidenced by the shifting of fluorescence from red to green, suggesting depolarization of mitochondria. The percentage of cells with mitochondrial membrane depolarization increased with the incubation time of oHC-GMC from 13.9 ± 1.1% at 30 min to 82.3 ± 8.5% at 1 h as compared to the control cells (5.3 ± 1.1%). The above results clearly suggested that our prodrug targets mitochondria without its functionalization with the mitochondria-targeting moiety. This result is also further corroborated by co-localization studies which revealed that upon photoexposure to oHC-GMC, the photoproduct coumarin compound accumulated in the mitochondria of cancer cells (Fig. 4a). The uptake of oHC-GMC prodrug into cells possibly takes place through a diffusion mechanism.40 The lipophilic nature of our prodrug and its depolarizing effects on mitochondria could be the cause of its accumulation within mitochondria.39,42–44 Recently, mitochondria-targeted drug delivery systems have gained considerable interest since the mitochondrial dysfunction is responsible for a variety of human diseases including cancer and it also plays a pivotal role in cell death by initiating apoptosis, which is regarded as a major mode of cell death in cancer therapy.45,46 Hence, our designed prodrug could be a promising candidate for the effective treatment of cancer.
Fig. 4. (a) Subcellular localization of the photoproduct coumarin compound of oHC-GMC in A549 cells examined by fluorescence microscopy. A549 cells treated with oHC-GMC (10 μM) followed by photolysis with visible light (400–700 nm, 11 mW) for 10 min: (A) fluorescence image of formed coumarin product after photolysis of oHC-GMC (λex/λem = 350/460 nm), (B) mitochondrial staining with Mito Red dye (λex/λem = 550/580 nm), (C) upon merging of images A and B, and (D) scatter plot representing the extent of co-localization. Scale bar = 20 μm. (b) Effects of oHC-GMC (10 μM) on MMP analyzed by FACS analysis. A549 cells were treated for 30 min and 1 h, then stained with JC-1 dye.
Visible-light-induced photocytotoxicity of oHC-GMC
The photocytotoxicity effect of oHC-GMC was evaluated in human lung carcinoma (A549) and human breast cancer (MCF7) cells using MTT assay (Fig. 5 and S3†). Thus, the cells were incubated with oHC-GMC at different concentrations for 1 h and then irradiated with visible light (400–700 nm, 11 mW) for 30 min, followed by further incubation for 72 h before treatment with the MTT reagent. The results showed a photo-triggered dose-dependent cell viability that decreased with the increase in concentration of the oHC-GMC prodrug (Fig. 5a). Control experiments were performed where the cells were irradiated with light or treated with oHC-GMC without light irradiation. Negligible cytotoxicity was observed in both cases, indicating that there was no drug release from oHC-GMC in the absence of light. The IC50 values of the oHC-GMC prodrug in A549 and MCF7 cells in visible light were determined to be 5.05 ± 0.30 μM and 5.45 ± 0.27 μM, respectively, whereas the prodrug showed negligible cytotoxicity in the dark up to the tested concentration of 20 μM (Fig. 5a and S3†). Further, the cell viability of oHC-GMC was determined by varying the exposure time to light. For this, cells were treated with prodrug (5 μM) and irradiated for different time points (0, 10, 20, and 30 min). A temporally controlled cell death was observed, wherein the cell viability decreased with increase in irradiation time (Fig. 5b). In contrast, there was no effect of light on IC50 values of free GMC observed in both A549 (IC50 = 0.65 ± 0.03 μM in light and 0.75 μM ± 0.05 in the dark) and MCF7 cells (IC50 = 1.36 ± 0.07 μM in light and 1.46 ± 0.08 μM in the dark) (Fig. S4†). Hence, we conclude that the cytotoxicity of our prodrug can be regulated by adjusting the irradiation time period or concentration which is not possible to achieve with the free drug.
Fig. 5. Cell viability as determined by MTT assay in A549 cells treated (a) with different concentrations of oHC-GMC prodrug in the absence (black bar) or presence (red bar) of visible light (400–700 nm, 11 mW) for 30 min of irradiation and (b) without (−) or with (+) the oHC-GMC prodrug (5 μM) by varying the exposure time of light irradiation.
NIR-light-triggered drug release and photocytotoxicity of oHC-GMC
The results of our visible-light-induced drug release and photocytotoxicity of the oHC-GMC prodrug further encouraged us to study its drug release and photocytotoxicity properties with NIR light irradiation (Fig. 6). NIR-light-triggered drug release systems are ideal in terms of clinical applications since NIR light has a far greater depth of penetration into biological tissues and less harmful effects on human tissues than visible or UV light.47,48 Thus, the solution of oHC-GMC was irradiated with two-photon NIR light (800 nm, 50 mW) from a femtosecond laser and the drug release properties were monitored by absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy (Fig. 6a and b and S5†). Interestingly, our oHC-GMC prodrug showed efficient drug release, which was determined to be 77% by fluorescence spectroscopy, upon irradiation with NIR light for 11 min. This result is remarkable and better than that of a previously reported oHC-based system which demonstrated only 32% drug release after 22 min of NIR light irradiation.37 We have also determined the two-photon uncaging cross section (δu) for E-to-Z photoisomerization of oHC-GMC with two-photon excitation at 800 nm using the formula δu = Φu(2) × ε(2). The δu value of our system was found to be 1.6 GM at 800 nm (1 GM = 10−50 cm4 s per photon), which is an order of magnitude larger than the 0.1 GM limit that was cited as a key factor for successful use in biological systems (Table S1†). The δu value of our caged system is similar to that of other oHC-based systems reported in the literature.25,33,35 Hence, the uncaging cross section of oHC-GMC suggested its suitability for biological application.
Fig. 6. (a) Time-resolved fluorescence spectra of oHC-GMC (50 μM) in 1 : 9 DMSO/PBS (100 mM, pH 7.3) upon irradiation with two-photon NIR femtosecond laser light (800 nm, 50 mW) at 25 °C. Each time the sample was irradiated for 1 min before measuring the fluorescence spectra with an excitation wavelength of 385 nm (λem = 475 nm). The emission spectra of oHC-GMC, before (red line) and after (black line) 11 min irradiation are highlighted. (b) Kinetics of drug release (%) from oHC-GMC (50 μM) in the dark (■) or under two-photon light (
) irradiation determined by measuring the emission (λem = 475 nm) of coumarin product. (c) Cell viability as determined by MTT assay in A549 cells treated with different concentrations of oHC-GMC prodrug in the absence (■) or presence (
) of two-photon NIR light (800 nm, 50 mW) for 10 min of irradiation. (d) Cell viability as determined by MTT assay in A549 cells treated without (−) or with (+) the oHC-GMC prodrug (10 μM) by varying the irradiation time of two-photon NIR light (800 nm, 50 mW).
Next, we evaluated the photocytotoxicity effect of oHC-GMC on cancer cells irradiated with two-photon NIR light by MTT assay (Fig. 6c and d). Accordingly, A549 cells treated with different concentrations of oHC-GMC were incubated for 1 h and then exposed to two-photon NIR light (800 nm, 50 mW) for 10 min, followed by further incubation for 72 h before MTT addition. Interestingly, our prodrug also showed good photocytotoxicity under NIR light to A549 cells with an IC50 value of 12.52 ± 0.62 μM, while no cytotoxicity was observed in the dark (Fig. 6c). On the other hand, there was no difference in the cytotoxicity of GMC observed in the dark (IC50 = 0.75 ± 0.05 μM) and under NIR light (IC50 = 0.80 ± 0.04 μM) to A549 cells (Fig. S6†). Further, the cell viability of oHC-GMC (10 μM) was determined by varying the irradiation time points (0, 5, 10, and 20 min) in NIR light (Fig. 6d). A temporally controlled cell death was observed and the cell viability decreased with the increase in two-photon NIR light irradiation time, which was found to be 35%, 47%, and 57% at 5, 10, and 20 min, respectively, whereas minimal cytotoxicity was determined with the cells irradiated with NIR light without treatment with oHC-GMC. Again, the cell death by our prodrug with NIR light is higher than that reported in the oHC-based system.37 Hence our oHC-GMC prodrug is a promising system demonstrating NIR-triggered temporally controlled efficient drug release and significant photocytotoxicity activity which could be useful for potential therapeutic applications in medicinal chemistry.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we have reported a photoactivatable prodrug (oHC-GMC) which showed on-demand, temporally controlled, and efficient drug release with real-time monitoring and photocytotoxicity activity under both visible (one-photon) and NIR (two-photon) light. The prodrug efficiently releases drug upon irradiation with visible light for 20 min, resulting in 89% drug release. Furthermore, the efficient drug release (77%) by the prodrug was determined by irradiation with NIR light for just 11 min which is better than that of other reported oHC-based systems. Moreover, the drug release can be monitored by the formation of the strongly fluorescent by-product coumarin reporter. The prodrug targets mitochondria without its functionalization to a mitochondria-targeting moiety, which was determined by FACS analysis and fluorescence microscopy imaging. The oHC-GMC showed light-triggered, dose-dependent, and temporally controlled cell death, whereas negligible cell death was observed in the absence of light. In contrast, no effect of light on the cytotoxicity of free GMC was observed. Our developed photoactivatable oHC-GMC prodrug system is superior to other oHC-based systems in literature reports in both the context of drug release and photocytotoxicity by either visible or NIR light irradiation. We envision that this type of photoactivatable system could be useful and in the future could find its application for developing advanced therapy.
Experimental section
Materials
Toluene, MeCN, EtOH, DMF and DMSO were used as HPLC grade without further drying. 4-(Diethylamino)-2-hydroxybenzaldehyde, carboethoxymethylidenetriphenylphosphorane, diisopropylethyl amine (DIPEA), sodium phosphate dibasic and sodium phosphate monobasic were purchased from Alfa-Aesar. Pyridine, Mito Red dye, and 5,5′,6,6′-tetrachloro-1,1′,3,3′-tetraethylbenzimidazolylcarbocyanine iodide (JC-1) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, and 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC) and 1-hydroxybenzotriazole hydrate (HOBt) were sourced from SRL. Gemcitabine hydrochloride was purchased from TCI Chemicals (India) Pvt. Ltd and sodium hydroxide was obtained from Central Drug House (CDH). Trypsin, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), fetal bovine serum (FBS), 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), penicillin–streptomycin solution (pen-strep), and 35 mm glass bottom plates were procured from Thermo Fischer Scientific. A thin-layer chromatograph (TLC) system was sourced from Merck, Germany. A visible light source (LED lamp, 400–700 nm, 15 W) was procured from Philips, India. The purity of compounds 1 and 2 was found to be ≥95% by NMR and high-resolution mass spectra, while the purity of the final compound (oHC-GMC) utilized for biological evaluation was determined to be ≥95% by NMR, high-resolution mass spectra and RP-HPLC.
Synthesis and characterization
Synthesis of compound 1
4-(Diethylamino)-2-hydroxybenzaldehyde (50 mg, 0.26 mmol, 1 eq.) and carboethoxymethylidenetriphenylphosphorane (135.2 mg, 0.39 mmol, 1.5 eq.) in 1 mL of dry toluene was heated at 60 °C under an argon atmosphere in the dark for 9 h. Then, the reaction mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature, and subsequently toluene was evaporated under reduced pressure. The obtained crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatography using hexane/EtOAc (2 : 1) to afford the product as a light-yellow solid (65.5 mg, 96%).
1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 7.94 (d, J = 12.9 Hz, 1H), 7.31 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 6.37 (d, J = 12.9 Hz, 1H), 6.24 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 6.08 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 4.25 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 3.34 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 4H), 1.33 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.16 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 6H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 169.38, 157.46, 150.77, 141.08, 130.82, 111.86, 109.69, 104.99, 98.13, 60.23, 44.60, 14.57, 12.78. ESI-MS (m/z): calculated 264.1600 [M + H]+, found 264.1608.
Synthesis of compound 2
Compound 1 (65.5 mg, 0.25 mmol, 1 eq.) was dissolved in 2 mL of EtOH and 1.2 mL of 2 M NaOH and stirred at 50 °C in the dark for 24 h. Then the reaction mixture was cooled to RT and diluted with EtOAc. The reaction mixture was acidified with 1.0 M HCl to keep a pH of 1 to 3. The aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 20 mL). The combined organic phase was further washed with brine (25 mL), dried over anhydrous MgSO4, filtered and evaporated to achieve the product as a yellow solid (43.8 mg, 74%).
1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) 11.72 (s, 1H), 9.79 (s, 1H), 7.68 (d, J = 11.9 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 6.18 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 2H), 6.14 (s, 1H), 3.31 (q, J = 7.0 Hz, 4H), 1.09 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 6H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) 168.87, 158.43, 150.26, 140.45, 130.19, 111.14, 108.82, 103.91, 97.34, 43.87, 12.59. ESI-MS (m/z): calculated 274.0846 [M + K]+, found 274.0945.
Synthesis of oHC-GMC
Compound 2 (17.2 mg, 0.074 mmol, 1.1 eq.), EDC (16.6 mg, 0.086 mmol, 1.3 eq.), HOBt (12.4 mg, 0.8 mmol, 1.2 eq.) and pyridine (10 μL, 0.124 mmol, 1.9 eq.) were taken in 200 μL of DMF and allowed to stir at RT for 3 h under an argon atmosphere. To the above mixture, gemcitabine hydrochloride (20 mg, 0.066 mmol, 1 eq.) and DIPEA (46.6 μL, 0.266 mmol, 4 eq.) in 200 μL of DMF were added and the mixture was continuously stirred at RT for 24 h in the dark. Then, the solvent was dried to give an oily crude product which was dissolved in DCM and washed with water. The organic fraction was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and evaporated. The obtained yellow green powder was further purified by preparative TLC using DCM/MeOH (20 : 1) to furnish a green powder as a final product (13.2 mg, 37%).
1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 7.89 (m, 1H), 7.72 (d, J = 12.6 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (s, 1H), 6.82 (dd, J = 7.3, 5.3 Hz, 1H), 6.30 (m, 2H), 6.04 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 5.34 (t, J = 3.8 Hz, 1H), 4.28 (dd, J = 7.0, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 4.20 (dd, J = 5.5, 1.8 Hz, 2H), 3.34 (q, J = 5.5 Hz, 4H), 1.17 (t, J = 5.7 Hz, 6H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 169.38, 161.72, 151.63, 147.49, 142.07, 141.96, 140.10, 137.15, 132.28, 132.20, 128.71, 125.53, 121.39, 118.70, 113.29, 105.45, 81.18, 70.03, 61.49, 41.70, 13.80. IR (ATR) ν (cm−1): 3186 br, 2920 w, 1724 w (C O), 1660 m (C C), 1575 s (N–H), 1271 m (C–O–C), 987 m, 786 m, 688 w. ESI-MS (m/z): calculated 481.1899 [M + H]+, found 481.1928.
Visible-light-triggered drug release by absorption spectroscopy
The drug release by oHC-GMC upon photoirradiation was monitored by absorption spectroscopy. For this, oHC-GMC (10 μM) was dissolved in 1 : 9 DMSO/PBS (100 mM, pH 7.3) and taken in a quartz cuvette. Then the solution in the cuvette was exposed to visible light (400–700 nm, 11 mW) at a distance of 2 cm for 0–20 min. Each time, the solution was exposed to light for 2 min at 25 °C and the absorption spectra were recorded just after photoirradiation.
Visible-light-triggered drug release by fluorescence spectroscopy
The light-triggered drug release profile of oHC-GMC was also examined by fluorescence spectroscopy. oHC-GMC (50 μM) dissolved in 1 : 9 DMSO/PBS (100 mM, pH 7.3) was irradiated with visible light (400–700 nm, 11 mW) at a distance of 2 cm for 0–20 min. The fluorescence spectra of oHC-GMC were measured after each photoirradiation for 2 min at 25 °C. The drug release from oHC-GMC was monitored by recording the emission intensity of coumarin reporter (λex = 385 nm and λem = 475 nm). For the dark control experiment, a similar protocol was followed without exposure of oHC-GMC to visible light.
Visible-light-triggered drug release by HPLC
The drug release of oHC-GMC was also further monitored by HPLC. Thus, oHC-GMC (50 μM) in 1 : 9 MeCN/PBS (100 mM, pH 7.3) was taken in a quartz cuvette and irradiated with visible light (400–700 nm, 11 mW) at a distance of 2 cm at RT. After each photoirradiation, an aliquot (10 μL) was taken from the oHC-GMC solution and analyzed by RP-HPLC using MeCN/water (1 : 1) both containing 0.1% TFA in the mobile phase at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1. The chromatograms were analyzed at 254 nm. The relative percentage of photoinduced conversion of oHC-GMC to GMC was determined by comparing their relative HPLC peak areas at each time point.
Determination of photo-uncaging or photoconversion quantum yields30,49
The photo-uncaging or photoconversion quantum yield (Φu) is defined as the probability of photoconversion after absorption of a photon or the ratio of the conversion rate (Rp) of the absorption rate of photons (Rabs):
where τp = decay constant (min) in the exponential fit of the decaying absorption values for the reactant.
σ λ = absorption cross section (cm2); it is related to the molar absorption coefficient by the equation σλ = (1000)2.303ελ/NA
I λ = irradiance at the sample (mW cm−2)
λ = irradiation wavelength (nm)
h = Planck's constant
c = speed of light
The photo-uncaging or photoconversion quantum yields (Φu) were determined by monitoring the changes in absorbance values of oHC-GMC and its photoproduct coumarin compound over time. oHC-GMC (50 μM) in 1 : 9 MeCN/PBS (100 mM, pH 7.3) was taken in a quartz cuvette and irradiated with visible light (400–700 nm, 11 mW) or two-photon NIR light (800 nm, 50 mW). After each photoirradiation, an aliquot (10 μL) was taken from the oHC-GMC solution and analyzed by RP-HPLC. The formation of the photoproduct coumarin and disappearance of oHC-GMC were quantified in terms of the absorption peak area of the chromatograms. The time constant τp was determined from the exponential fit of the disappearance of the oHC-GMC prodrug which was used to calculate the photo-uncaging quantum yield (Φu). The two-photon uncaging cross section (δu) with two-photon excitation at 800 nm was determined using the formula δu = Φu(2) × ε(2).
Cell culture
Human lung carcinoma (A549) and human breast cancer (MCF7) cells were procured from the National Center for Cell Science (NCCS) Pune. The cells were cultured in high-glucose Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin–streptomycin at 37 °C in a CO2 incubator (5% CO2). When the cells reached 90% confluency, the cells were trypsinized, centrifuged and redispersed in complete medium. The cells were seeded in 96-well microplates (at a density of 9000 cells per well) or in glass well 35 mm μ-dishes (at a density of 2 × 105 cells per dish) and grown at 37 °C for 24 h in a 5% CO2 incubator.
Cellular uptake
A549 cells were seeded in 6 well plates at a density of 1.5 × 105 cells per well. The cells were washed twice with PBS and incubated with 10 μM oHC-GMC (prepared in complete culture medium containing 1% DMSO) for 0, 0.5, 1 and 2 h at 37 °C. Following incubation, the medium was removed and replaced with 200 μL of PBS and irradiated with visible light (400–700 nm, 11 mW) for 10 min. After irradiation the cells were again washed with PBS followed by trypsinization and resuspended in 500 μL of HBSS (Hanks' balanced salt solution). Then the blue fluorescence of the photoproduct (i.e., coumarin reporter) of oHC-GMC in A549 cells was determined using a flow cytometer (FACS-LSR Fortessa; BD Biosciences, USA). Approximately 10 000 cells were counted for each sample and BD FACS-DIVA Software was used to obtain the cells for each measurement. The analysis was done using FlowJo software (Tree Star).
Cellular imaging with real-time monitoring of drug release
The intracellular drug release was determined by recording the intracellular blue fluorescence intensity of the formed coumarin reporter upon photoirradiation of oHC-GMC inside the cells. For this, A549 cells were seeded in a 12-well culture plate at a density of 2 × 105 cells per well one day prior to the experiments. Then the cells were treated with oHC-GMC (10 μM) and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in the dark. After that, the medium was removed from the wells and the cells were washed with cold PBS (2 × 2 mL) followed by irradiation with visible light (400–700 nm, 11 mW) for different time periods (0, 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 min). Further, the cells were incubated for 10 min before performing microscopy imaging using an inverted fluorescence microscope (Olympus IX70, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a digital camera (DP71, Olympus). The fluorescence was analyzed using the blue channel. The increase in fluorescence intensity due to the release of drug was evaluated with ImageJ and is given as a mean value of 30 cells. Data points were fitted to an exponential equation.
Subcellular release
The subcellular release of the photoproduct coumarin reporter of oHC-GMC in the intracellular medium was determined by fluorescence microscopy. Accordingly, A549 cells were seeded in 35 mm 6 well plates at a density of 2.5 × 105 cells per well one day prior to the experiments. The cells were incubated with oHC-GMC (10 μM) in DMEM complete medium for 1 h at 37 °C. Then the cells were washed with PBS which was replaced with 1 mL PBS before irradiation with visible light (400–700 nm, 11 mW) for 10 min. Following light irradiation, PBS was replaced with medium and then incubated with Mito Red (100 nM) for 15 min. The medium was then removed and the cells were washed thoroughly with PBS (3 × 2 mL) before microscopy imaging was performed using an inverted fluorescence microscope (Olympus IX70, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a digital camera (DP71, Olympus). The fluorescence of the photoproduct coumarin reporter was analyzed with a DAPI filter (λex/λem = 350/460 nm), and the Mito Red fluorescence was analyzed with a TRITC filter set (λex/λem = 550/580 nm). The extent of co-localization was calculated by a scatter plot using Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC).
Mitochondrial accumulation of oHC-GMC
Mitochondrial accumulation of oHC-GMC was assessed by monitoring the change in MMP (ΔΨm) using JC-1 dye. JC-1 dye tends to aggregate in healthy mitochondria and exhibits red fluorescence,41 whereas in depolarized mitochondria, this dye accumulates in the cytoplasm and emits green fluorescence. Thus, the loss of ΔΨm can be determined in healthy (polarized) and unhealthy (depolarized) cells by measuring the ratio of red-to-green fluorescence of JC-1. Hence, A549 cells at a density of 1.5 × 105 cells were seeded in 35 mm dishes. After 24 h, the cells were treated with oHC-GMC (10 μM) for 30 min and 1 h. Post-treatment, the cells were washed twice with 1× PBS. The cells were then trypsinized and harvested by centrifugation at 400g for 15 min at RT. To each cell pellet, 0.5 mL of freshly prepared JC-1 (5 μg mL−1) working solution was added. The cells were gently resuspended by pipetting the solution, incubated at 37 °C in a CO2 incubator for 15 min. The cells were then washed twice with 1× assay buffer and finally resuspended in 500 μL of 1× assay buffer for measurement. JC-1 was excited at 488 nm and emission was monitored at 515–545 nm (green) and 570–600 nm (red) using BD FACS Aria immediately after staining. 10 000 events were acquired for each sample. The analysis was done using FlowJo software (Tree Star, USA).
Photocytotoxicity assay under visible light
The photocytotoxicity activity of oHC-GMC in A549 and MCF7 cells was evaluated under visible light (400–700 nm, 11 mW) by MTT assays. For this, different concentrations of oHC-GMC and GMC were prepared in complete culture medium containing ≤1% DMSO. The cells were cultured at a density of 9000 cells per well in 96 well cell culture plates with DMEM (200 μL) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Then, the medium in the 96 well cell cultured plates was removed and replaced with 200 μL of medium containing different concentrations of oHC-GMC or GMC and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in a CO2 incubator in the dark. After that the medium was removed and the cells were washed twice with PBS and replaced with 200 μL of PBS. Next, the cells were irradiated with or without visible light for 10, 20, and 30 min. Following irradiation, the PBS was replaced with 200 μL of complete medium and then further incubated in the dark for 72 h. Subsequently, the cells were washed with PBS followed by addition of 200 μL of DMEM and 20 μL of MTT solution (5 mg mL−1 in PBS) to each well and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. Then the medium was discarded and replaced with 200 μL of DMSO in each well to dissolve the formazan crystals formed. The cell viability was determined by measuring the absorbance at 570 nm using a SpectraMax M2 microtitre plate reader (Molecular Devices LLC, USA). For the dark control set, a similar procedure was followed without exposure of oHC-GMC or GMC to visible light. The data obtained were analysed with Origin Pro 8.5 software.
NIR-triggered drug release by absorption spectroscopy
The drug release from oHC-GMC upon photoirradiation with two-photon light (excitation at 800 nm, average power ∼50 mW) for 0–20 min was monitored by absorption spectroscopy. For this, a 10 μM solution of oHC-GMC in 1 : 9 DMSO/PBS (100 mM, pH 7.3) was taken in a quartz cuvette and exposed to NIR light each time before measuring the absorption spectra. While irradiating the sample, we ensured maximum exposure of the sample to the laser light by making light pass through the solution from the top.
NIR-triggered drug release by fluorescence spectroscopy
The NIR-triggered drug release was examined by irradiation with two-photon light (excitation at 800 nm, average power ∼50 mW) from a femtosecond laser as described in the literature.37 Briefly, oHC-GMC (50 μM) solution in 1 : 9 DMSO/PBS (100 mM, pH 7.3) was irradiated with two-photon light (800 nm, 50 mW) for 0–11 min. Here again, during sample irradiation, we ensured maximum exposure of the sample to the laser light by making light pass through the solution from the top. Each time, the sample solution was irradiated for 1 min before measuring the fluorescence spectra using an Edinburgh Instruments F900 spectrophotometer. The drug release by oHC-GMC was monitored by measuring the emission intensity of coumarin reporter (λex = 385 nm and λem = 475 nm). For the dark control set, a similar procedure was followed without exposure of oHC-GMC to two-photon light.
Photocytotoxicity assay under NIR light
The photocytotoxicity experiments with NIR light followed a similar protocol to that described in the section Photocytotoxicity assay under visible light. Briefly, the cultured A549 cells (9000 cells per well) in 96 well plates containing 100 μL DMEM were treated with different concentrations of oHC-GMC or GMC and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in a CO2 incubator in the dark. Then the medium was removed from the cultured plates and replaced with 200 μL of PBS. Subsequently, the cells were irradiated with NIR femtosecond laser light using two-photon excitation at 800 nm (50 mW) for 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 min. After photoexposure, the PBS was removed and replaced with 200 μL of medium, and the cells were further incubated for 72 h in the dark. Next, the cells were washed with PBS followed by addition of 200 μL of fresh culture medium and 20 μL of MTT solution (5 mg mL−1 in PBS) to each well and incubated for 2 h. The medium was then discarded and 200 μL of DMSO was added to each well to dissolve the formazan crystals formed by the living cells. The cell viability was determined by measuring the absorbance at 570 nm. For the dark control experiment, a similar protocol was followed without exposure of oHC-GMC or GMC to NIR light. The results were analysed using the Origin Pro 8.5 software.
Author contributions
P. K. S. conceptualized the project, designed the experiments, and wrote and edited the manuscript. Aj. G. synthesized and characterized the compounds and performed the experiments in extracellular and intracellular medium, analyzed the experimental data, and wrote the manuscript. N. S. assisted in synthesis and characterization of compounds and drug release studies in extracellular medium. Ar. G. assisted in synthesis of compounds and two-photon NIR experiment. N. D. helped in performing experiments under two-photon NIR light. S. K. edited the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
P. K. S. acknowledges MHRD-STARS (Project Code: MoE-STARS/STARS-1/374) for financial support. We thank AIRF, JNU, for the instrumentation facilities. Aj. G. gratefully acknowledges MHRD-STARS for a fellowship. Ar. G. acknowledges UGC for a fellowship. We thank Prof. P. K. Chowdhury, IIT Delhi, for generously allowing us to use the spectrofluorometer and absorption spectrophotometer. The authors would also like to thank M. K. Gupta, Amity University, Noida, for the help in FACS data collection.
Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available Methods, relevant experimental procedures, characterization data, cytotoxicity studies, figures and table. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d2md00438k
References
- Brieke C. Rohrbach F. Gottschalk A. Mayer G. Heckel A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012;51:8446–8476. doi: 10.1002/anie.201202134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ankenbruck N. Courtney T. Naro Y. Deiters A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017;57:2768–2798. doi: 10.1002/anie.201700171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vickerman B. M. Zywot E. M. Tarrant T. K. Lawrence D. S. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2021;5:816–834. doi: 10.1038/s41570-021-00326-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kowalik L. Chen J. K. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2017;13:587–598. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elamri I. Abdellaoui C. Bains J. K. Hohmann K. F. Gande S. L. Stirnal E. Wachtveitl J. Schwalbe H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:10596–10603. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c02817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Corrie J. E. T., Furuta T., Givens R. S., Yousef A. L. and Goeldner M., Photoremovable Protecting Groups Used for the Caging of Biomolecules, WILEY-VCH, Weinheim, 2005 [Google Scholar]
- Pelliccioli A. P. Wirz J. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2002;1:441–458. doi: 10.1039/b200777k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klán P. Šolomek T. Bochet C. G. Blanc A. Givens R. Rubina M. Popik V. Kostikov A. Wirz J. Chem. Rev. 2013;113:119–191. doi: 10.1021/cr300177k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bochet C. G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1. 2002;2:125–142. [Google Scholar]
- Weinstain R. Slanina T. Kand D. Klán P. Chem. Rev. 2020;120:13135–13272. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bardhan A. Deiters A. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2019;57:164–175. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2019.03.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aujard I. Benbrahim C. Gouget M. Ruel O. Baudin J.-B. Neveu P. Jullien L. Chem. – Eur. J. 2006;12:6865–6879. doi: 10.1002/chem.200501393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shah S. Sasmal P. K. Lee K. B. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2014;2:7685–7693. doi: 10.1039/C4TB01436G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Procházková E. Šimon P. Straka M. Filo J. Majek M. Cigáň M. Baszczyňski O. Chem. Commun. 2021;57:211–214. doi: 10.1039/D0CC06928K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Furuta T. Wang S. S. Dantzker J. L. Dore T. M. Bybee W. J. Callaway E. M. Denk W. Tsien R. Y. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999;96:1193–1200. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bojtár M. Kormos A. Kis-Petik K. Kellermayer M. Kele P. Org. Lett. 2019;21:9410–9414. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b03624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- López-Corrales M. Rovira A. Gandioso A. Bosch M. Nonell S. Marchán V. Chem. – Eur. J. 2020;26:16222–16227. doi: 10.1002/chem.202002314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wells L. A. Brook M. A. Sheardown H. Macromol. Biosci. 2011;11:988–998. doi: 10.1002/mabi.201100001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Günay K. A. Ceccato T. L. Silver J. S. Bannister K. L. Bednarski O. J. Leinwand L. A. Anseth K. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019;58:9912–9916. doi: 10.1002/anie.201901989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Asad N. Deodato D. Lan X. Widegren M. B. Phillips D. L. Du L. Dore T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017;139:12591–12600. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b06363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hennig A.-L. K. Deodato D. Asad N. Herbivo C. Dore T. M. J. Org. Chem. 2020;85:726–744. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.9b02780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singh A. K. Kundu M. Roy S. Roy B. Shah S. S. Nair A. V. Pal B. Mondal M. Singh N. D. P. Chem. Commun. 2020;56:9986–9989. doi: 10.1039/D0CC01903H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gupta A. Gautam A. Sasmal P. K. J. Med. Chem. 2022;65:5274–5287. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turner A. D. Pizzo S. V. Rozakis G. W. Porter N. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987;109:1274–1275. doi: 10.1021/ja00238a062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gagey N. Neveu P. Jullien L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007;46:2467–2469. doi: 10.1002/anie.200604598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paul A. Mengji R. Chandy O. A. Nandi S. Bera M. Jana A. Anoop A. Singh N. D. P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017;15:8544–8552. doi: 10.1039/C7OB02280H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Abramov A. Maiti B. Keridou I. Puiggalí J. Reiser O. Díaz D. D. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2021;42:2100213. doi: 10.1002/marc.202100213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paul A. Mengji R. Bera M. Ojha M. Jana A. Singh N. D. P. Chem. Commun. 2020;56:8412–8415. doi: 10.1039/D0CC03524F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nani R. R. Gorka A. P. Nagaya T. Yamamoto T. Ivanic J. Kobayashi H. Schnermann M. ACS Cent. Sci. 2017;3:329–337. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.7b00026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jang Y. Kim T.-I. Kim H. Choi Y. Kim Y. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2019;2:2567–2572. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.9b00259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turner A. D. Pizzo S. V. Rozakis G. Porter N. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988;110:244–250. doi: 10.1021/ja00209a040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jones P. B. Porter N. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999;121:2753–2761. doi: 10.1021/ja9842518. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gagey N. Neveu P. Benbrahim C. Goetz B. Aujard I. Baudin J. B. Jullien L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:9986–9998. doi: 10.1021/ja0722022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gagey N. Emond M. Neveu P. Benbrahim C. Goetz B. Aujard I. Baudin J.-B. Jullien L. Org. Lett. 2008;10:2341–2344. doi: 10.1021/ol800284g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Venkatesh Y. Srivastava H. K. Bhattacharya S. Mehra M. Datta P. K. Bandyopadhyay S. Singh N. D. P. Org. Lett. 2018;20:2241–2244. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b00090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feng W. Gao C. Liu W. Ren H. Wang C. Ge K. Li S. Zhou G. Li H. Wang S. Jia G. Li Z. Zhang J. Chem. Commun. 2016;52:9434–9437. doi: 10.1039/C6CC02932A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Key reference:; Singh N. Gupta A. Prasad P. Sah R. K. Singh A. Kumar S. Singh S. Gupta S. Sasmal P. K. J. Med. Chem. 2021;64:17813–17823. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gupta A. Prasad P. Gupta S. Sasmal P. K. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12:35967–35976. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c11161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo D. Chen T. Ye D. Xu J. Jiang H. Chen K. Wang H. Liu H. Org. Lett. 2011;11:2884–2887. doi: 10.1021/ol200908r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holmila R. J. Vance S. A. Chen X. Wu H. Shukla K. Bharadwaj M. S. Mims J. Wary Z. Marrs G. Singh R. Molina A. J. Poole L. B. King S. B. Furdui C. M. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:6635. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24493-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smiley S. T. Reers M. Mottola-Hartshorn C. Mei L. Chen A. Smith T. W. Steele G. D. Chen A. L. B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1991;88:3671–3675. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.9.3671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jose J. Loudet A. Ueno Y. Barhoumi R. Burghardt R. C. Burgess K. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010;8:2052–2059. doi: 10.1039/B925845K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frantz M.-C. Wipf P. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2010;51:462–475. doi: 10.1002/em.20554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Catalán M. Olmedo I. Faúndez J. Jara J. A. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:8684. doi: 10.3390/ijms21228684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chan D. C. Cell. 2006;125:1241–1252. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang P. Song J. H. Song D. K. Zhang J. Hao C. Cell. Signalling. 2006;18:1528–1535. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2005.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dabrowski J. M. Arnaut L. G. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2015;14:1765–1780. doi: 10.1039/c5pp00132c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ash C. Dubec M. Donne K. Bashford T. Lasers Med. Sci. 2017;32:1909–1918. doi: 10.1007/s10103-017-2317-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lord S. J. Conley N. R. Lee H.-I. D. Samuel R. Liu N. Twieg R. J. Moerner W. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:9204–9205. doi: 10.1021/ja802883k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.








