Abstract
Twenty eight patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy were studied by somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) from nerve stimulation at the wrist and from skin stimulation at the first, third or fifth finger depending on the root involved. In order to evaluate the reliability of various "radicular SEP patterns" as described in the literature, absolute latencies and side-to-side differences of the brachial plexus component from the supraclavicular fossa (N9), the medullary component (N13) from the cervical vertebra Cv7, and the primary cortical component (N20, P25) were assessed. Side-to-side differences of the amplitudes of N20/P25 and of the conduction times across the intervertebral fossa (interval N9-N13) were analysed. After nerve stimulation, 68% of the patients had false negative findings on the symptomatic, while 36% had positive findings on the asymptomatic side. After segmental stimulation, 72% of the patients had false negative findings on the symptomatic, while 22% had positive findings on the asymptomatic side. It is concluded that SEPs following nerve and segmental stimulation do not reliably confirm clear-cut already established diagnoses of unilateral radiculopathy with sensory and motor deficit. Therefore, they will not be helpful in the electrophysiological investigation of cervicobrachialgias of unknown origin.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Dal-Bianco P., Mamoli B., Dorda W. Identifikationshäufigkeit und Konfigurationsvarianten der NSEP-Signal in Abhängigkeit vom Ableitort und Messzeitpunkt. EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb. 1985 Dec;16(4):206–211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eisen A., Hoirch M., Moll A. Evaluation of radiculopathies by segmental stimulation and somatosensory evoked potentials. Can J Neurol Sci. 1983 Aug;10(3):178–182. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100044875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- El Negamy E., Sedgwick E. M. Delayed cervical somatosensory potentials in cervical spondylosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1979 Mar;42(3):238–241. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.42.3.238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ganes T. Somatosensory conduction times and peripheral, cervical and cortical evoked potentials in patients with cervical spondylosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1980 Aug;43(8):683–689. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.43.8.683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Iragui V. J. The cervical somatosensory evoked potential in man: far-field, conducted and segmental components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1984 Mar;57(3):228–235. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(84)90124-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Piade J. P., Pelissier J., Georgescu M., Blotman F., Cadilhac J., Simon L. Potentiels évoqués somesthésiques de moelle et névralgie cervico-brachiale. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic. 1984 Jan;51(1):7–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siivola J., Sulg I., Heiskari M. Somatosensory evoked potentials in diagnostics of cervical spondylosis and herniated disc. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1981 Oct;52(4):276–282. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(81)90056-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stöhr M., Buettner U. W., Wiethölter H., Riffel B. Combined recordings of compound nerve action potentials and spinal cord evoked potentials in differential diagnosis of spinal root lesions. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr (1970) 1983;233(2):103–110. doi: 10.1007/BF00343431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Synek V. M. Somatosensory evoked potentials after stimulation of digital nerves in upper limbs: normative data. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1986 Nov;65(6):460–463. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(86)90025-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu Y. L., Jones S. J. Somatosensory evoked potentials in cervical spondylosis. Correlation of median, ulnar and posterior tibial nerve responses with clinical and radiological findings. Brain. 1985 Jun;108(Pt 2):273–300. doi: 10.1093/brain/108.2.273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]