Skip to main content
British Journal of Industrial Medicine logoLink to British Journal of Industrial Medicine
. 1990 Jun;47(6):392–399. doi: 10.1136/oem.47.6.392

Morbidity prevalence study of workers with potential exposure to epichlorohydrin.

S P Tsai 1, S R Cowles 1, D L Tackett 1, M T Barclay 1, C E Ross 1
PMCID: PMC1035189  PMID: 2378816

Abstract

This study examined the morbidity experience from 1981 to 1988 of two cohorts (Shell cohort and Enterline cohort) of workers who had potential exposure to epichlorohydrin (ECH). The morbidity prevalence data for this study were extracted from the morbidity section of the Shell health surveillance system which included all illness and absence records in excess of five days. For both cohorts, the standardised morbidity ratios (SMRs) for all causes and all neoplasms were similar to an internal comparison group. There were no increases in heart disease morbidity for the Shell cohort (SMR = 97) or the Enterline cohort (SMR = 90). The SMRs for heart disease in the lower exposure group of the Shell cohort were 101 and 93 for the corresponding Enterline cohort. They were 92 and 87, respectively, in the higher exposure group. The increased risk of heart disease mortality reported by Enterline et al in workers more heavily exposed to ECH was not confirmed in this morbidity study. Morbidity from skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, however, was found to be increased significantly in the Shell cohort. The SMR was 98 for the lower exposure group and 195 for the higher exposure group. A review of the original morbidity reports for each case suggested that factors unrelated to exposure to ECH such as the physical demands of a particular job, amount of time outside--for example, exposure to poison ivy--and other underlying medical conditions may be of greater importance than exposure to ECH.

Full text

PDF
396

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Austin W. B., Phillips C. F. Development and implementation of a health surveillance system. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1983 Sep;44(9):638–642. doi: 10.1080/15298668391405472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beck M. H., King C. M. Allergic contact dermatitis to epichlorhydrin in a solvent cement. Contact Dermatitis. 1983 Jul;9(4):315–315. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1983.tb04400.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cooper C., Wickham C., Coggon D. Sedentary work in middle life and fracture of the proximal femur. Br J Ind Med. 1990 Jan;47(1):69–70. doi: 10.1136/oem.47.1.69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gittelsohn A., Senning J. Studies on the reliability of vital and health records: I. Comparison of cause of death and hospital record diagnoses. Am J Public Health. 1979 Jul;69(7):680–689. doi: 10.2105/ajph.69.7.680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Industrial Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES