Skip to main content
PMC home page
British Journal of Industrial Medicine logoLink to British Journal of Industrial Medicine
. 1991 Mar;48(3):185–192. doi: 10.1136/oem.48.3.185

Factors influencing vibration sense thresholds used to assess occupational exposures to hand transmitted vibration.

N Harada 1, M J Griffin 1
PMCID: PMC1035347  PMID: 2015210

Abstract

The effects of various conditions, including temporary threshold shifts (TTS) induced by exposure to vibration on vibration sense thresholds, have been investigated. The vibration sense thresholds of five subjects were measured on the middle fingertip of the left hand. A contactor with a diameter of 7 mm was surrounded by three alternative plates with holes of different sizes. The contact force was controlled at either 1 N, 2 N, or 3 N. For the TTS test, the left hand was exposed to vibration at 20 ms-2 rms for five minutes. The frequencies of both the exposure to vibration and the vibration threshold test were in the range 16 Hz to 500 Hz. Using a surround around the contactor greatly reduced the vibration sense threshold at 16 Hz and 31.5 Hz but increased the threshold at 125 Hz, 250 Hz, and 500 Hz. An effect of contact force was seen only at the higher frequencies; larger contact forces led to lower thresholds at 125 Hz, 250 Hz, and 500 Hz. As temperature of the finger skin decreased, the vibration thresholds increased, with the changes at higher frequencies greater than those at lower frequencies. The TTS at 16 Hz and 31.5 Hz measured 0.5 minutes after exposure to vibration (TTS0.5) were highest after exposures to vibration at lower frequencies. The TTS0.5 at 63 Hz was similar after exposure to all frequencies. The TTS0.5 values at 125 Hz, 250 Hz, and 500 Hz were highest after exposures to vibration at 125 Hz and 250 Hz. It was apparent that the physiological characteristics of vibration sensation at low and high frequencies differed significantly. These findings suggest that two representative frequencies can be used when evaluation the neurological effects of occupational exposures to vibration by means of vibration sense thresholds.

Full text

PDF
186

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bjerker N., Kylin B., Lidström I. M. Changes in the vibratory sensation threshold after exposure to powerful vibration. Ergonomics. 1972 Jul;15(4):399–406. doi: 10.1080/00140137208924442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brammer A. J., Piercy J. E., Auger P. L. Assessment of impaired tactile sensation. A pilot study. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1987 Aug;13(4):380–384. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brammer A. J., Piercy J. E., Auger P. L., Nohara S. Tactile perception in hands occupationally exposed to vibration. J Hand Surg Am. 1987 Sep;12(5 Pt 2):870–875. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(87)80252-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brammer A. J., Taylor W., Piercy J. E. Assessing the severity of the neurological component of the hand-arm vibration syndrome. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1986 Aug;12(4 Spec No):428–431. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gescheider G. A., Capraro A. J., Frisina R. D., Hamer R. D., Verrillo R. T. The effects of a surround on vibrotactile thresholds. Sens Processes. 1978 Jun;2(2):99–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gescheider G. A., Frisina R. D., Verrillo R. T. Selective adaptation of vibrotactile thresholds. Sens Processes. 1979 Mar;3(1):37–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harada N. Esthesiometry, nail compression and other function tests used in Japan for evaluating the hand-arm vibration syndrome. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1987 Aug;13(4):330–333. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harada N., Matsumoto T. Validity of various function tests performed in Japan as a screening test for vibration syndrome. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1984;54(4):283–293. doi: 10.1007/BF00378581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Harada N., Yamada S., Matsumoto T. Changes of the vibratory sensation threshold in workers using vibrating tools. Sangyo Igaku. 1976 Jul;18(4):395–402. doi: 10.1539/joh1959.18.395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Harada N. [Studies on the changes in the vibratory sensation threshold at the fingertip in relation to some physical parameters of exposed vibration. Part 1. A study on the methods of vibration exposure and measurement of the vibratory sensation threshold (author's transl)]. Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 1978 Dec;33(5):699–703. doi: 10.1265/jjh.33.699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Harada N. [Studies on the changes in the vibratory sensation threshold at the fingertip in relation to some physical parameters of exposed vibration. Part 2. A study on the equal TTS curves of the vibratory sensation and the hygienic allowable limit of portable mechanized tool (author's transl)]. Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 1978 Dec;33(5):706–717. doi: 10.1265/jjh.33.706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hayward R. A., Griffin M. J. Measures of vibrotactile sensitivity in persons exposed to hand-arm vibration. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1986 Aug;12(4 Spec No):423–427. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Johansson R. S., Landström U., Lundström R. Responses of mechanoreceptive afferent units in the glabrous skin of the human hand to sinusoidal skin displacements. Brain Res. 1982 Jul 22;244(1):17–25. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(82)90899-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Johansson R. S. Tactile sensibility in the human hand: receptive field characteristics of mechanoreceptive units in the glabrous skin area. J Physiol. 1978 Aug;281:101–125. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lundström R., Johansson R. S. Acute impairment of the sensitivity of skin mechanoreceptive units caused by vibration exposure of the hand. Ergonomics. 1986 May;29(5):687–698. doi: 10.1080/00140138608968303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nishiyama K., Watanabe S. Temporary threshold shift of vibratory sensation after clasping a vibrating handle. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1981;49(1):21–33. doi: 10.1007/BF00380805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Vallbo A. B., Johansson R. S. Properties of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the human hand related to touch sensation. Hum Neurobiol. 1984;3(1):3–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Verrillo R. T., Gescheider G. A. Effect of prior stimulation on vibrotactile thresholds. Sens Processes. 1977 Aug;1(4):292–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Verrillo R. T. Psychophysics of vibrotactile stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am. 1985 Jan;77(1):225–232. doi: 10.1121/1.392263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Verrillo R. T. The effect of surface gradients on vibrotactile thresholds. Sens Processes. 1979 Mar;3(1):27–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Industrial Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES