Skip to main content
PhytoKeys logoLink to PhytoKeys
. 2023 Jul 13;229:131–138. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.229.106466

A new species of Amorphophallus (Araceae) from northeastern Thailand

Wilawan Promprom 1, Wannachai Chatan 1,, Pattana Pasorn 1, Narueset Prasertsri 1, Thinnakon Angkahad 1
PMCID: PMC10359917  PMID: 37485010

Abstract

Amorphophallussakonnakhonensis Chatan & Promprom, a new species from northeastern Thailand, is described and illustrated. The new species is most similar to A.harmandii Engl. & Gehrm. and A.linearis Gagnep., but it is distinguished by the combination of characters as follows: clear differences with A.harmandii are shorter style; disc-like, slightly smooth surface, concave centre, ca. 0.2 × 0.1 mm stigma; slightly cylindrical, slightly narrower upper part of staminate flower zone; slightly cylindrical to elongate-fusiform, erect or slightly erect, creamy white appendix. The clearly distinct morphology with A.linearis are disc-like, slightly smooth surface, concave centre, ca. 0.2 × 0.1 mm stigma; elliptic or obovate leaflet; 1–3 cm long, creamy white appendix. The preliminary conservation status was assessed, and the distinct characteristics of similar species were discussed.

Key words: Amorphophallussakonnakhonensis , Araceae, aroid, plant diversity, plant taxonomy

Introduction

Amorphophallus Blume ex Decne. (Decaisne 1834) is a genus in the family Araceae that contains about 200–250 species (Hetterscheid 2012; Claudel et al. 2017; POWO 2023) and which is distributed from tropical west Africa, subtropical eastern Himalayas, throughout subtropical and tropical Asia into tropical western Pacific and northeastern Australia (Hetterscheid and Ittenbach 1996; Sedayu et al. 2010; Hetterscheid 2012), and 62 species are currently recorded for Thailand (POWO 2023). Amorphophallus species usually grow in tropical humid forests, seasonal forests, grass savannahs and secondary forests. Commonly, the members of Amorphophallus do not produce their leaves and inflorescences simultaneously (i.e. the inflorescence is produced first and lasts for a short period, and then the leaf is produced, and leaves are only produced for one year for some species.)

During field surveys of plant diversity and medicinal plants in northeastern Thailand in 2019–2022, and our investigations in Sakon Nakhon Province, we collected Amorphophallus specimens which were not readily identifiable. After the herbarium specimens and living plants were carefully investigated, we concluded that these were not representatives of any previously-named plant species. Consequently, a new species is described here.

Materials and methods

Plant material was collected during field surveys in Khok Si Suphan District, Sakon Nakhon Province in 2019–2022. Morphological observations of the new species were carried out on living plants from the field, as well as on herbarium specimens in BKF and BK. This study consulted the relevant taxonomic literature (such as Gagnepain 1942; Hetterscheid and Ittenbach 1996; Li et al. 2010; Hetterscheid 2012, etc.). The preliminary conservation status of the new species was assessed by applying the criteria (IUCN 2022) given.

Taxonomic treatment

. Amorphophallus sakonnakhonensis

Chatan & Promprom sp. nov.

6D858CB7-05B8-5EBE-AC22-2B5315111D0A

urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77323169-1

Figs 1 , 2 , 3 , 4

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Amorphophallussakonnakhonensis Chatan & Promprom. A habitat and habit B habit.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Amorphophallussakonnakhonensis Chatan & Promprom. A whole plant B, C tuber and inflorescence from the same plant D spadix E infructescence and fruits F seeds.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Amorphophallussakonnakhonensis Chatan & Promprom. A whole plant B, C tuber and inflorescence from the same plant D seeds E spadix F staminate flowers G pistillate flowers H infructescence and fruits I fruit.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Distribution of Amorphophallussakonnakhonensis Chatan & Promprom (green circle).

Type.

Thailand. Sakon Nakhon Province: Khok Sri Suphan District, northeastern Thailand, 300–320 m elev., 16°59'45.5"N, 104°15'46.9"E, 24 April 2021, W. Chatan 2897 (holotype: BKF!; isotype: BK!); Khok Sri Suphan District, northeastern Thailand, W. Chatan 3073 (paratype: BKF!), 16°59'45.5"N, 104°15'49"E, 29 June 2022.

Diagnosis.

Amorphophallussakonnakhonensis is most similar to A.harmandii Engl. & Gehrm. and A.linearis Gagnep. The essential differences with A.harmandii are shorter style (ca. 1 mm vs. 2–3 mm long); disc-like, slightly smooth surface, concave centre, ca. 0.2 × 0.1 mm stigma vs. depressed, shallowly bilobed, ca 0.6 × 1.5 mm; slightly cylindrical, narrower upper part staminate flower zone vs. fusiform-conical or lageniform with distinctly dilated basal haft; slightly cylindrical to elongate-fusiform, erect or slightly erect, creamy white appendix vs. very narrowly conical, near myosuroid or fusiform conical or slightly sigmoidally curved forward in the lower half, white or greenish yellow.

The essential differences with A.linearis are disc-like, slightly smooth surface, concave centre, ca. 0.2 × 0.1 mm stigma vs. capitate, globose, 1.0–1.3 × 0.9–1.5 mm; elliptic or obovate leaflet vs. linear less often lanceolate; 1–3 cm long, creamy white appendix vs. 18–50 cm long, creamy white or green.

Description.

Perennial herb, narrowly elongated, not branching, 5–10 cm long and 0.4–1.0 cm diam., skin light yellowish to yellowish brown with few or many fibrous lateral roots. Both flowering and leafing plants of small stature, up to 12 cm high. Leaves solitary. Petiole 2.5–2.8 × 0.2–0.3 cm, smooth, white near base and greenish-purple or dark dull red to dark red or rust-coloured at upper part; leaf blade up to 10 cm diam., rachis narrowly winged throughout; leaflet elliptic or obovate, ca. 0.5–3.0 × 0.3–0.5 cm, adaxial side green, abaxial side pale green, apex acuminate. Inflorescence solitary, developed before leaf; peduncle 3.0–5.5 cm long, 2.0–2.5 mm diam., white near base and greenish to greenish-purple at upper part; spathe broadly ovate, both sides dull greenish yellow or creamy white excepting for the deep purple red or bluish purple at base adaxially, 2.0–2.2 × 1.5–1.8– cm, erect, embracing and close to spadix and upper part moving slightly away from spadix during anthesis, smooth on both surfaces, except for lower part verrucate adaxially; spadix subequal or longer than spathe, 2–3 cm long; pistillate and staminate flower zones contiguous, but flowers are slightly distant from each other at connection zone. Pistillate flower zone cylindrical, ca. 1.0 × 0.5 cm, axis green, most flowers slightly distant from each other; ovary depressed, shallow bilobed, ca. 1 × 1 mm, light green; style short, thick, ca. 1 mm long; stigma ca. 0.2 × 0.1 mm, creamy or yellowish, disc-like, surface slightly smooth, centre concave. Staminate flower zone slightly cylindrical, 1.5–2.0 × 0.6–0.8 cm, upper part narrower; staminate flowers fused to a synandrium consisting of 3–5 stamens, creamy or yellowish; filaments united into a short column, ca. 1.0 × 0.8–1.2 mm, whitish or creamy. Appendix slightly cylindrical to elongate-fusiform, 1–3 × 0.8–1.0 cm, erect or slightly erect, creamy white; apex obtuse to slightly acute; surface smooth. Berry green when young and mature, conical to broadly pyriform, shallowly bilobed, ca. 0.5 × 0.5 cm, upper part elongated, odourless, surface verrucate. Seed ellipsoid or ovoid, 2.5–3.5 × 1.0–1.3 mm, apex conical.

Flowering and fruiting.

Flowering in May–June and fruiting in June–August.

Distribution.

The new species is endemic to Thailand and is known from only the type locality, Khok Sri Suphan District, Sakon Nakhon Province, northeastern Thailand (Fig. 4).

Ethymology.

Specific epithet of A.sakonnakhonensis refers to the type locality, Sakon Nakhon Province, northeastern Thailand.

Vernacular name.

The Vernacular name of the new species is Buk Noi.

Preliminary conservation status.

According to the fieldwork, one population of Amorphophallussakonnakhonensis was found at the type locality in Khok Sri Suphan District, Sakon Nakhon Province, northeastern Thailand. However, further explorations are needed for a proper conservation assessment because more information on its distribution and population status is required. Therefore, the species has been preliminarily assigned to Data Deficient (DD) category according to The Guidelines for Using The IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria (IUCN, 2022).

Discussion.

Amorphophallussakonnakhonensis Chatan & Promprom is similar to A.harmandii Engl. & Gehrm. (Engler 1911) and A.linearis Gagnep. (Gagnepain 1941), the plants from Thailand and Indochina (Hetterscheid 2012). The new species would be placed in subgenus. Metandrium (Claudel et al. 2017), based on the hypothesis on the phylogenetic affinity of the species, which clearly lies with the A.harmandii alliance, close to that species, particularly seen by the near-unique fruits (green, warty). Similarities to A.harmandii and A.linearis consist of the narrowly elongated tuber, spadix longer than spathe, and contiguous nature of the staminate and pistillate flower zones. The different morphological characters are described below. The main differences of the new species from A.harmandii are that it has shorter style; disc-like, slightly smooth surface, concave centre stigma; slightly cylindrical staminate flower zone; slightly cylindrical to elongate-fusiform, erect or slightly erect, creamy white appendix. The new species is also different from A.linearis by its disc-like, slightly smooth surface, concave centre stigma; elliptic or obovate leaflet; 1–3 cm long, creamy white appendix. In addition, the size of these organs of the new species are smaller or slightly smaller, including tuber, petiole, leaf blade, peduncle, spathe, spadix, staminate flower zone and appendix. More details of morphological differences amongst A.sakonnakhonensis, A.harmandii Engl. & Gehrm. and A.linearis Gagnep. are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Morphological differences amongst Amorphophallussakonnakhonensis, A.harmandii Engl. & Gehrm. and A.linearis Gagnep.

Characters Amorphophallussakonnakhonensis Chatan & Promprom A.harmandii Engl. & Gehrm. A.linearis Gagnep.
Tuber 5–10 cm long and 0.4–1.0 cm diam., not branching ca 40 cm long and 2 cm diam., not or occasionally branching 10–45 cm long and 1–2 cm diam., not or occasionally branching
Petiole 2.5–2.8 × 0.2–0.3 cm 20–80 cm by 4–10 mm 25–85 by 0.5–1.5 cm
Leaf blade up to 10 cm diam. 36–74 cm diam. 30–80 cm diam.
Leaflet elliptic or obovate, ca 0.5–3.0 × 0.3–0.5 cm elliptic, elliptic-lanceolate or lanceolate, 2–20 × 1–7 cm linear, less often lanceolate, 3–17 × 0.2–1.0 cm
Peduncle 3.0–5.5 cm long, 2.0–2.5 mm diam. peduncle 6–18 cm long, 3–4 mm diam. 19–55 cm long, 0.3–1 cm diam.
Spathe broadly ovate, 2.0–2.2 × 1.5–1.8 cm, smooth on both surfaces, except for the base verrucate adaxially ovate to orbicular, 5–13 × 5–10.5 cm, base densely verrucate, verrucae small adaxially elongate-triangular or lanceolate, 7–16 × 3.5–6 cm, base within densely clothed with irregular, laterally compressed, ridge-like, sometimes flaky, often confluent, warts, often with short or long hair-like branches
Spadix 2–3 cm long 8–15 cm long 12–57 cm long
Female flowers slightly distant from each other; style ca. 1 mm long; disc-like, slightly smooth surface, concave centre, ca. 0.2 × 0.1 mm stigma closed to each other; style 2–3 mm long; depressed, shallowly bilobed, ca 0.6 × 1.5 mm stigma closed to each other; style 1–2 mm long; capitate globose, 1.0–1.3 × 0.9–1.5 mm stigma
Staminate flower zone size 1.5–2.0 × 0.6–0.8 cm; slightly cylindrical, narrower upper part 3–6 × 1–1.7 cm; fusiform-conical or lageniform with distinctly dilated basal haft 2.5–8 × 0.4–2 cm; conical or slightly lageniform
Appendix slightly cylindrical to elongate-fusiform;
1–3 × 0.8–1.0 cm,
erect or slightly erect;
creamy white, never green
very narrowly conical, near myosuroid or fusiform conical or slightly sigmoidally curved forward in the lower half; 5–18 cm × 5–16 mm; creamy white or greenish yellow myosuroid, base slightly narrowed, 18–50 × 0.5–1.6 cm, at first erect, nodding after anthesis; creamy white or green;

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Amorphophallus sakonnakhonensis

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to the curators and officers of BK and BKF for providing information on the type specimens investigated in this study. Thanks for the linguistic advice from Dr. Jolyon Dodgson, Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University. Many thanks for valuable comments from editor and reviewers.

Citation

Promprom W, Chatan W, Pasorn P, Prasertsri N, Angkahad T (2023) A new species of Amorphophallus (Araceae) from northeastern Thailand. PhytoKeys 229: 131–138. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.229.106466

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This research project was financially supported by Mahasarakham University (Fast Track 2020).

Author contributions

Conceptualization: WC. Data curation: PP, NP, WP, WC. Formal analysis: TA, WP. Funding acquisition: WC.

Author ORCIDs

Wilawan Promprom https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8821-2267

Wannachai Chatan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3941-7626

Pattana Pasorn https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3808-7331

Narueset Prasertsri https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1798-1291

Thinnakon Angkahad https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1439-8518

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  1. Claudel C, Buerki S, Chatro LW, Antonelli A, Alvarez N, Hetterscheid WLA. (2017) Large-scale phylogenetic analysis of Amorphophallus (Araceae) derived from nuclear and plastid sequences reveals new subgeneric delineation. Journal of the Linnean Society, Botany 184: 32–45. 10.1093/botlinnean/box013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Decaisne MJ. (1834) Description d´une herbier de l´ile de Timor. Nouvelles Annales du Museum d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris 3: 333–501. [Google Scholar]
  3. Engler A. (1911) Araceae-Lasioideae. Das Pflanzenreich 48 (IV. 23C). Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany, 1–130.
  4. Gagnepain F. (1941) Aracées nouvelles Indochinoises. In: Humbert H. (Ed.) Notulae Systematicae (Paris) (Vol.9 (3)). Laboratoire de phanérogamie (Muséum national d’histoire naturelle), Paris, France, 116–140.
  5. Gagnepain F. (1942) Aracées. In: Lecomte H. (Ed.) Flore générale de l’Indo-Chine (Vol.6). Laboratoire de phanérogamie (Muséum national d’histoire naturelle), Paris, France, 1075–1196.
  6. Hetterscheid WLA. (2012) Amorphophallus (Araceae). In: Santisuk T, Larsen K. (Eds) Flora of Thailand (Vol.11, Part 2). Prachachon, Bangkok, Thailand, 130–186.
  7. Hetterscheid WLA, Ittenbach S. (1996) Everything you always wanted to know about Amorphophallus. Aroideana 19: 7–131. [Google Scholar]
  8. IUCN (2022) Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria (Version 13). Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf/
  9. Li H, Zhu G, Boyce PC, Murata J, Hetterscheid WLA, Bogner J, Jacobsen N. (2010) Araceae. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, Hong DY. (Eds) Flora of China (Vol.23). Science Press, Beijing, and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, China, USA, 3–79.
  10. POWO (2023) Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/
  11. Sedayu A, Eurlings MCM, Gravendeel B, Hetterscheid WLA. (2010) Morphological character evolution of Amorphophallus (Araceae) based on a combined phylogenetic analysis of trnL, rbcL and LEAFY second intron sequences. Botanical Study 51: 473–490. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Amorphophallus sakonnakhonensis

Data Availability Statement

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.


Articles from PhytoKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES