Summary
Forces controlling tissue morphogenesis are attributed to cellular-driven activities, and any role for extracellular matrix (ECM) is assumed to be passive. However, all polymer networks, including ECM, can develop autonomous stresses during their assembly. Here, we examine the morphogenetic function of an ECM before reaching homeostatic equilibrium by analyzing de novo ECM assembly during Drosophila ventral nerve cord (VNC) condensation. Asymmetric VNC shortening and a rapid decrease in surface area correlate with the exponential assembly of collagen IV (Col4) surrounding the tissue. Concomitantly, a transient developmentally induced Col4 gradient leads to coherent long-range flow of ECM, which equilibrates the Col4 network. Finite element analysis and perturbation of Col4 network formation through the generation of dominant Col4 mutations that affect assembly reveal that VNC morphodynamics is partially driven by a sudden increase in ECM-driven surface tension. These data suggest that ECM assembly stress and associated network instabilities can actively participate in tissue morphogenesis.
Keywords: Drosophila, basement membrane, collagen IV, morphogenesis, central nervous system, extracellular matix, surface tension, embryonic development
Graphical abstract
Highlights
-
•
Sudden uneven Col4 assembly surrounding the fly VNC initiates tissue condensation
-
•
Col4 flows coherently on the tissue surface independently of cellular contractility
-
•
Modeling indicates that a BM-dependent increase in surface tension drives morphogenesis
-
•
Perturbations of Col4 assembly affect the rate of VNC condensation
Serna-Morales et al. demonstrate that the initiation of Drosophila VNC condensation is triggered by sudden basement membrane assembly around the tissue, which increases the surface tension independently of cellular contractile activity. Their work suggests that intrinsic stresses in an assembling basement membrane network can actively contribute forces that drive tissue morphogenesis.
Introduction
The forces controlling tissue development are attributed to cellular-driven activities.1 Any role for extracellular matrix (ECM) in modulating overall tissue shape is largely assumed to be passive by providing a substrate that allows cells to actively remodel their environment.2 However, recent work on developing zebrafish semicircular canals has revealed that ECM accumulation can have a more instructive role in shaping tissues through swelling and modulation of osmotic pressure.3 In addition, all polymer networks—including ECM—can theoretically develop autonomous stresses during their initial polymerization, and there has been speculation that out-of-equilibrium ECM behaviors may be playing a more active role during tissue morphogenesis than many would assume.4,5,6,7 Investigating these active mechanisms requires analyzing the ECM network during embryonic assembly before reaching a crosslinked, homeostatic state. Here, we exploit Drosophila embryogenesis, which involves a de novo burst of ECM polymerization midway through development,8,9 to examine the role of an out-of-equilibrium ECM network during central nervous system development. Although altering cellular activity failed to stop the initiation of ventral nerve cord (VNC) morphogenesis, we found that perturbing ECM assembly or delivery to the tissue surface severely affected the process. Live imaging of ECM polymerization during morphogenetic initiation identified a sudden coherent flow of matrix on the tissue surface—independent of cellular dynamics—in a posterior to anterior direction, which correlates with the overall motion of the tissue. In addition, finite element modeling identified that an anisotropic surface tension along the axis of ECM motion was sufficient to explain the complex shape changes associated with VNC morphogenesis. These findings show that ECM assembly can actively contribute forces that shape a developing tissue.
Results
Drosophila VNC condensation consists of two distinct temporal phases, and initial anisotropic changes in tissue morphology are independent of VNC cellular activity
During stage 15 of Drosophila development, the embryonic nerve cord undergoes a sudden reduction in length in a process called VNC condensation. Time-lapse imaging of the entire ∼12 h of condensation revealed two distinct phases in VNC morphodynamics: a rapid 1st phase when most of the morphological remodeling occurs in which the tissue shortens asymmetrically from tail to head over ∼3 h and a slower 2nd phase resulting in a symmetric reduction in length over the remaining ∼9 h of development (Figures 1A, S1A, and S1B; Video S1, parts 1–3). Analyses of tissue geometry revealed that although the 2nd phase involved a reduction in tissue volume, the change in shape during the 1st phase was isovolumetric, suggesting that at least for the 1st phase, the process is not a simple “condensation” (Figures 1B and 1C). Interestingly, it was recently reported that the scaling of VNC length with embryo length is suddenly lost after the start of condensation,10 which is likely explained by the increase in thickness of the tissue (Figures 1B and 1C). These data suggest that VNC morphogenesis involves temporally controlled and mechanistically distinct processes.
The VNC is composed of a central nerve bundle surrounded by supporting glial cells, and previous work revealed that affecting glial or neuronal activity perturbs condensation.11 However, inhibiting cell activity by driving a dominant negative (DN) Myosin-II or Rac GTPase in glia or neurons led to relatively minor effects on condensation, whereby the 1st phase was left intact (Figures S1C–S1H). In addition, tracking glial movement during the 1st phase revealed a coherent flow of cells without any cellular rearrangements that could explain the VNC morphodynamics (Figures S1I–S1L; Video S1, part 4). Consistent with these results, recent work revealed that the genetic ablation of glia or neurons and RNAi knockdown of Myosin-II in glia left the initial fast phase of VNC condensation intact12 (Figure S1D). However, unlike what was previously reported, we did not observe any oscillatory behavior during the 1st phase of condensation.12 Instead, we observed a highly coordinated anisotropic movement of VNC segments across the tissue rather than independently contracting elements. These data suggest that there are VNC cell-extrinsic forces driving the 1st phase of condensation, and we therefore set out to determine what was initiating the process.
Initiation of VNC condensation is correlated with hemocyte deposition of Col4 on the tissue surface and a sudden increase in tissue stiffness
There is an underexplored function of the ECM during Drosophila VNC morphogenesis. The VNC is ensheathed by a basement membrane (BM) composed of collagen type IV (Col4) and Laminin, and mutations in BM components perturb condensation.13,14 Correlation of VNC condensation with Col4 levels using a GFP-trap in the Col4α2 subunit revealed that the initiation of the process coincided with the embryonic induction of Col4 expression and an exponential increase in production (Figures 1D and 1E; Video S1, parts 5 and 6). By contrast, Laminin is produced at much earlier stages of embryogenesis,8,9 which led us to hypothesize that Col4 assembly was specifically involved in triggering the start of VNC morphogenesis.
Drosophila hemocytes (macrophages), which are also hypothesized to be involved in VNC condensation,9,11 are the major producers of Col4 during embryogenesis9 and their developmental dispersal from their birth in the head mesoderm coincides with the start of condensation (Video S1, part 7). Hemocytes deposit Col4 around the VNC as they disperse evenly throughout the embryo,9 which consequently results in a transient gradient of Col4 from head to tail along the tissue (Figures S2A and S2B). Interestingly, this is consistent with a recently observed head-to-tail gradient in VNC stiffness12 along with data in Drosophila egg chambers revealing that graded Col4 assembly translates into graded BM stiffness.15 This suggests that local differences in Col4 assembly can indeed lead to a mechanical gradient across the VNC surface. Subsequently, as condensation proceeds, the Col4 gradient equilibrated such that by the start of the 2nd phase, there was an even distribution of Col4 around the VNC (Figures S2A and S2B). Col4 induction also correlated with an increase in VNC stiffness from the 1st to the 2nd phase of condensation, consistent with data revealing that BM stiffness mainly depends on Col416 (Figure 2A). These data suggest that Col4 assembly was suddenly altering the mechanical properties of the tissue.
Inhibiting Col4 deposition or altering its distribution along the VNC surface prevents the initial anisotropic change in VNC morphology
Analyses of BM mutants revealed that in the absence of Laminin, which is required for subsequent BM component assembly,9 condensation is severely affected and the VNC falls apart due to cell clumping (Figures 2B–2D; Video S2, part 1). By contrast, in the absence of Perlecan, which is expressed slightly later during embryogenesis than Col4,9 condensation was slower and the 2nd phase was severely affected; however, there was a clear asymmetric 1st phase of VNC morphogenesis (Figures 2B–2D; Video S2, part 1). However, Col4 mutants had a distinct phenotype: Col4 mutant VNCs remained intact, yet deformed, and both phases of VNC condensation were severely inhibited (Figures 2B–2D; Video S2, part 1). Importantly, the 1st phase of condensation was lost in the absence of Col4 and what little condensation was present was isotropic rather than asymmetric (Figures 2C and 2D; Video S2, part 1). In addition, Col4 mutants failed to show an increase in tissue stiffness (Figure 2A). The Col4 mutant VNC phenotype was specific to Col4 assembly around the tissue as local disruption of Col4 by expression of a surface-bound matrix metalloprotease (Drosophila MMP2)17,18 with the same glial-Gal4 driver used to inhibit glial cell activity, phenocopied the Col4 mutant (Figures S2C and S2D). Genetically deleting hemocytes, a major source of embryonic Col4, also reduced VNC shortening (Figure S3). Furthermore, preventing hemocyte release from the head of the embryo by expression of Rac DN, which causes a relative overabundance of Col4 in the head and an exacerbation of the Col4 gradient9 led to an almost complete cessation of VNC condensation and abnormal deformation of the tissue (Figure S3; Video S2, parts 2 and 3). Therefore, similar to what was previously observed,11,19 disrupting hemocytes and Col4 distribution leads to a far more severe effect on VNC condensation than inhibiting VNC cellular activity.
Finite element analysis reveals that the initial anisotropic change in VNC morphology can be explained by a sudden increase in asymmetric surface tension
Polymer networks, especially in thin film organization, are known to generate stresses during assembly, which can lead to polymer motion as stresses equilibrate.20 Indeed, inhomogeneities in mixtures of ECM components in a test tube can generate forces that directly drive long-range translocation of inert particles.5,6 To determine whether BM-derived surface stress could contribute to the observed changes in VNC shape on the initiation of condensation, we developed a finite element model consisting of two materials: an internal core representing the VNC attached to the brain, which is surrounded by a thin BM shell. Simulations revealed that a uniform pressure perpendicular to the surface was sufficient to decrease the length of the tissue from tail to head. However, this also led to the constriction of the diameter of the VNC, which was not observed experimentally during the 1st phase of condensation (Figure 3A; Methods S1). In a second approach, we modeled the shell such that it instead exerted a surface tension, which can be modulated by altering its capacity to shrink and its stiffness. Consistent with the Col4-dependent increase in tissue stiffness during condensation, a simulated isotropic increase in surface tension asymmetrically reduced the tissue length; however, this also led to a reduction in tissue width and rounding of nerve cords, which was also not observed in real specimens (Figures 1B, 1C, and 3A; Methods S1). However, further simulations suggested that an anisotropic surface tension, which is predominantly along the length of the tissue, could explain the increase in width and height of the VNC during the 1st phase of condensation (Figures 1B, 1C, and 3A; Methods S1). These data suggest that a BM-dependent increase in tissue surface tension predominantly along the axis of the previously observed stiffness gradient12 (and Col4 gradient, this work) can explain the rapid anisotropic change in tissue shape during the initiation of VNC morphogenesis.
Live imaging of Col4 assembly on the VNC surface reveals a coherent viscous-like flow along the axis of the predicted increase in tissue surface tension
We subsequently live-imaged surface glial dynamics and Col4 accumulation surrounding the VNC at a high spatiotemporal resolution to determine the possible interplay between cell activity and ECM remodeling. As VNC condensation initiated, a rapid and coherent long-range flow of Col4 was observed—preceding glial motion—in a direction antiparallel to the Col4 gradient (i.e., tail to head direction), which was along the predicted predominant axis of surface tension (Figures 3B–3D and S4A–S4E; Video S3, parts 1–3). Subsequently, there was a drift in the surface glia, which are in direct contact with the overlying ECM enveloping the tissue (Figures 3B and 3C; Video S3, parts 2 and 3). At the start of condensation, the surface glia are initially spaced out on the VNC surface and not in contact with each other and eventually undergo a mesenchymal to epithelial transition to form an epithelial monolayer by the end of the 1st phase.21,22 Despite the approximate 16% decrease in VNC surface area during the 1st phase (determined from our measured change in tissue dimensions, Figures 1B and 1C), surface glial cells paradoxically increase in area as they spread themselves around the tissue,21,22 highlighting that glial cell contraction is not involved in this change in tissue geometry. We observed no obvious cell migration or cell rearrangements of glial cells that would explain the overall change in VNC morphology nor did we observe any local ECM remodeling by the underlying glial cells (Video S3, parts 2 and 3). Indeed, correlating the local alignment of particle image velocimetry (PIV) vectors of ECM and glial motion revealed that the Col4 network was moving more coherently over the tissue surface than the cells themselves (Figures 3D and 3E). In addition, the Col4 network appeared to self-assemble with polymers stretching tens of microns linking the dispersed population of glial cells (Figure 3B). Therefore, as predicted of non-uniform thin film growth with a strain or structural gradient,20 these data reveal that BM-autonomous assembly dynamics lead to long-range viscous flow and equilibration of the network.
Local disruption of the BM network or perturbation of Col4 assembly alters VNC morphodynamics
We next examined perturbations that affect ECM polymerization or network organization on VNC morphodynamics. First, modeling predicted that an increase in uniform surface tension should lead to rounder nerve cords when viewed in cross-section, which was observed in Col4 mutants (Figures S4F and S4G). This suggests that in the absence of Col4 assembly, ensheathment of the VNC by surface glia, which are hypothesized to act as a “compression sock” around the tissue,12 results in isotropic surface tension that alters VNC morphology. Simulations further suggested that local changes in surface tension should lead to global effects on condensation rate (Figure 4A; Methods S1). To confirm the presence of long-range network effects, we locally cleaved the ECM network in a narrow stripe along the VNC using a parasegmental driver23 with MMP2 expression17,18 and examined VNC motion by tracking the tail of the tissue. Cleaving the ECM network in a stripe in the middle of the VNC slowed the motion of the tail of the tissue, which was over a hundred microns distant to the site of cleavage (Figure 4B). This long-range effect suggests that a coherent and interconnected ECM network is required for VNC morphogenesis. We subsequently examined a temperature-sensitive (TS) point mutant Col4 allele (G552D)24,25 that resulted in the ECM network disintegrating when shifted to 29°C (Figures 4C and 4D). This revealed that subtle alteration of the temperature in this TS mutant was sufficient to affect the overall rate of VNC motion (Figure 4E). In addition, driving a G552D Col4 transgene specifically in hemocytes severely inhibited VNC condensation, phenocopying the Col4 mutant, confirming that hemocyte-derived Col4 is indeed essential for initiating the process (Figures 4F and 4G). In addition, expressing this same DN Col4 transgene (G552D) while also trapping hemocytes in the head partially rescued the severe condensation defect, suggesting that uneven Col4 assembly was causing this severe phenotype (Figure 4G; Video S2, part 3). We also generated an N-terminal truncation in the Col4α1 protein that removed part of the putative 7S domain (Figures 4H and 4I), which is hypothesized to be involved in multivalent interactions important for Col4 network assembly.26,27 Driving this transgene specifically in hemocytes was sufficient to perturb Col4 network formation and subtly affect condensation rate, which we speculate is due to a retardation of Col4 polymerization (Figures 4J and 4K).
Discussion
The textbook view of morphogenesis has assumed that the changes in tissue shape are driven by a limited repertoire of cell-autonomous activities (e.g., cell rearrangements, shape changes, migrations, and divisions).1 However, the supramolecular nature of ECM networks, such as BMs, that rely on underexplored covalent and noncovalent interactions for their self-assembly8,28,29,30,31 should not be neglected as sources of stress that shape an embryo. In addition, surface tension has been predicted to be a dominant force in shaping developing tissues,32 and although alterations in surface tension are assumed to be driven by epithelial activity,33 BM networks are also likely to be involved. Indeed, in the case of VNC condensation, the sudden exponential increase in Col4 formation around the VNC is behaving as a compression sleeve, which actively envelops the tissue to shrink its surface area, resulting in an initial isovolumetric shape change as surface stresses equilibrate. By contrast, in the 2nd phase of condensation, once the asymmetric Col4 network stresses have dissipated, the cells within the VNC likely take a more active part in the process with the ECM possibly playing a more stereotypical passive role.
There are many reasons why a polymer network such as the BM could generate forces during development. The polymerization process on its own, especially if there are instabilities such as concentration gradients during assembly, will lead to stress development and ECM-autonomous motion. Indeed, in vitro polymerization assays have revealed that non-uniform distributions of collagen self-assembly can generate surface tension gradients that lead to a Marangoni flow within the network.34 In addition, a mechanical mismatch between a polymer thin film (i.e., BM), and the underlying substrate can also lead to material deformations.20,35 As long-range coherent ECM motion has been observed during several developmental processes,4,7,36 nonequilibrium phenomena in an immature ECM network in flux may be playing unappreciated active roles in tissue morphogenesis.
Limitations of the study
Although our data suggest an active role for ECM assembly in generating VNC stresses that initiate morphogenesis, it is difficult to completely rule out any role for cellular activity. Nevertheless, perturbations directly affecting cells within the VNC lead to relatively minor effects and normal initiation of condensation.11,12 Conversely, BM defects are far more severe. Understanding how intrinsic stresses develop in the embryonic BM is non-trivial. It requires a biophysical dissection of nucleation/growth of the polymer network and polymer-substrate interactions, which is currently beyond the resolution limit of in vivo imaging. Our work has also left out the remainder of VNC condensation after the initial fast phase, which likely involves glia working in conjunction with the ECM, and it will be interesting to understand their interplay during this cell-dependent phase of the process.
STAR★Methods
Key resources table
REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
---|---|---|
Experimental models: Organisms/strains | ||
D. melanogaster: w1118 | Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center | RRID: BDSC_3605 |
D. melanogaster: repo-Gal4 | Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center | RRID: BDSC_7415 |
D. melanogaster: elav-Gal4 | see Luo et al.37 | N/A |
D. melanogaster: Sn-Gal4 | see Zanet et al.38 | N/A |
D. melanogaster: PS7-Gal4 | see Bowman et al.23 | N/A |
D. melanogaster: UAS-LifeActGFP | see Zamet et al.38 | N/A |
D. melanogaster: UAS-RedStinger | Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center | RRID: BDSC_8547 |
D. melanogaster: UAS-MMP2 | see Page-McCaw et al.39 | N/A |
D. melanogaster: UAS-RacN17 | Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center | RRID: BDSC_6292 |
D. melanogaster: UAS- ZipDN-GFP | see Franke et al.40 | N/A |
D. melanogaster: UAS-Zip RNAi | Vienna Drosophila Resource Center | RRID: Flybase_FBst0470845 |
D. melanogaster: UAS-Col4α2-GFP | see Van de Bor et al.41 | N/A |
D. melanogaster: UAS-LifeAct-mScarlet | This paper | N/A |
D. melanogaster: UAS-Col4α1wt-mScarlet | This paper | N/A |
D. melanogaster: UAS-Col4α1D7S-mScarlet | This paper | N/A |
D. melanogaster: UAS-Col4α1G552D-mScarlet | This paper | N/A |
D. melanogaster: fax::GFP | see Buszczak et al.42 | N/A |
D. melanogaster: repo-Cherry | Gift from C. Gabernard | N/A |
D. melanogaster: elav-mYFP | see Kohsaka et al.43 | N/A |
D. melanogaster: srpHemo-H2A::3xmCherry | see Gyoergy et al.44 | N/A |
D. melanogaster: ColIVα2 (Vkg)-GFP | see Morin et al.45 | N/A |
D. melanogaster: Df(2L)LanB1 (ΔLaminin) | see Urbano et al.14 | N/A |
D. melanogaster: Df(2L)BSC172 (ΔCol4) | Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center | RRID: BDSC_9605 |
D. melanogaster: Cg25Ck13420 | Kyoto Stock Center | RRID: DGGR_102873 |
D. melanogaster: trolnull (ΔPerlecan) | see Voigt et al.46 | N/A |
D. melanogaster: srpAS | see Rehorn et al.47 | N/A |
D. melanogaster: Col4α1G552D | see Kelemen-Valkony et al.24 | N/A |
D. melanogaster: Mhc1 | Gift from F. Schnorrer | N/A |
Oligonucleotides | ||
Primer: 5' GGGAATTGGCCGGCCA ATTAATTAAATGGGTGTCGCAGATT TGATCAAG 3' |
This paper | N/A |
Primer: 5' CGCAGACCTAGGAAAGCTA GCTTACTTGTACAGCTCGTCCATGCC 3' |
This paper | N/A |
Primer: 5' CCCCGTAATGCAGAAGAAGA 3' | This paper | N/A |
Primer: 5' GACACTGGACTCGATGGACA 3' | This paper | N/A |
Primer: 5' GACACTGGACTCGATGGACA 3' | This paper | N/A |
Primer: 5' GCTGGTATTCCCGGAGTTTC 3' | This paper | N/A |
Recombinant DNA | ||
Plasmid: pUASt-5C | General Fly Transformation Vectors | RRID: DGRC_1261 |
Plasmid: pUASt-Col4α1wt-mScarlet | see Matsubayashi et al.8 | N/A |
Plasmid: pUASt-attB | General Fly Transformation Vectors | RRID: DGRC_1419 |
Plasmid: pUASt-LifeAct-mScarlet | This paper | N/A |
Plasmid: pUASt-attB-Col4α1wt-mScarlet | This paper | N/A |
Plasmid: pUASt-attB-Col4α1D7s-mScarlet | This paper | N/A |
Plasmid: pUASt-attB-Col4α1G552D-mScarlet | This paper | N/A |
Software and algorithms | ||
LAS AF | Leica | http://leica-microsystems.com/home/ |
Zen | Carl Zeiss | https://www.zeiss.com/microscopy/int/products/microscope-software/zen-lite.html |
Zen Black | Carl Zeiss | https://www.zeiss.com/microscopy/int/products/microscope-software/zen.html#downloads |
ImageJ/Fiji | Fiji | http://fiji.sc/ |
Imaris | Bitplane | https://imaris.oxinst.com |
Abaqus | Dassaults Systèmes | https://www.3ds.com/products-services/simulia/products/abaqus/ |
MATLAB | MathWorks | https://uk.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html |
Photoshop | Adobe | https://www.adobe.com/uk/products/photoshop.html |
Illustrator | Adobe | https://www.adobe.com/uk/products/illustrator.html |
Prism | GraphPad | https://www.graphpad.com |
Excel | Microsoft | https://www.microsoft.com/en-gb/microsoft-365/excel |
Other | ||
In-Fusion Cloning | Takara Bio USA | 638920 |
Drosophila injection service | BestGene | https://thebestgene.com/ |
10S Voltalef oil | VWR | 24627.188 |
Glass-bottom dishes | WPI | https://www.wpi-europe.com/products/cell-and-tissue/fluorodish-cell-culture/fd35-100.aspx |
M205 fluorescent dissection microscope | Leica | http://leica-microsystems.com/home/ |
PLANAPO 2.0x objective for M205 | Leica | 10450030 |
LSM 880 confocal microscope | Carl Zeiss | https://www.zeiss.co.uk/microscopy/dynamic-content/news/2014/news-lsm-880.html |
63x NA 1.4 Plan-Apochromat oil objective for LSM 880 | Carl Zeiss | https://zeiss.com/corporate/int/home.html |
Cooling/Heating Plate TP-CHS-C | TOKAI HIT | https://www.tokaihit.com/products/TP-CHS-C/ |
Resource availability
Lead contact
Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Brian Stramer (brian.m.stramer@kcl.ac.uk).
Materials availability
Drosophila lines generated in this study are available from the lead contact upon reasonable request.
Experimental model and subject details
Fly stocks and preparations
Repo-Gal448 and elav-Gal437 were used to target transgene expression in the glial cells and neurons forming the VNC. Sn-Gal438 was used to express transgenes specifically in hemocytes. The parasegmental driver PS7-Gal423 was used to express transgenes in a narrow stripe along the VNC. The following UAS lines were used: UAS-LifeActGFP,38 UAS-RedStinger, UAS-MMP2,39 UAS-Rac DN,37 UAS-Myosin II DN,40 UAS-Col4a2-GFP,41 UAS-LifeAct-mScarlet, UAS-Col4a1wt-mScarlet, UAS- Col4a1D7S-mScarlet, and UAS- Col4a1G552D-mScarlet (see following sections). Fax::GFP,42 repo-Cherry (gift from Clemens Cabernard, University of Basel), and elav-mYFP43 were used to label the VNC independently of Gal4. SrpHemo-H2A::3xmCherry44 was used to label the nuclei of hemocytes independently of Gal4. The homozygous viable Col4a2-GFP45 protein trap was used to visualize Col4. The following mutant alleles and deficiencies were used: Df(2L)LanB1 (referred to as DLaminin, removing lanB1),14 Df(2L)BSC172 (referred to as DCol4, removing a chromosomal region including the two Drosophila Col IV genes vkg and Cg25C), Cg25Ck13420 (Col4a1 mutant), trolnull (referred to as DPerlecan),46 srpAS (lacking hemocytes),47 Col4a1G552D (referred as G552D and also known as DTS-L2, containing an aspartatic acid substitution in Col4a1 at G552),24 Mhc1 (gift from Frank Schnorrer and characterized for its use in imaging the Drosophila embryo in Matsubayashi et al.8). Unless used for temperature switch experiments, the flies were left to lay eggs on grape juice agar plates overnight at 25°C. Embryos were dechorionated in bleach. The appropriate genotype of the embryos was identified based on the presence of fluorescent probes and/or the absence of balancer chromosome expressing fluorescent markers. The genotypes of the embryos used in each experiment are listed in the supplemental information (Table S1).
Method details
Construction of UAS-LifeAct-mScarlet, UAS- Col4a1wt-mScarlet, UAS- Col4a1D7s-mScarlet and UAS-Col4a1G552D-mScarlet
pUASt-LifeAct-mScarlet was generated by inserting an 802 bp fragment (synthesized by eurofins Genomics) containing LifeAct followed by mScarlet-I sequences,49 and an extra 15 bp at the 3' and 5' ends allowing their insertion into the linearized NheI-PacI pUASt-5C plasmid using In-Fusion cloning strategy (Takara Bio USA, Inc.).
The construct was sequenced (eurofins Genomics) using the following sequencing primers:
5' GGGAATTGGCCGGCCAATTAATTAAATGGGTGTCGCAGATTTGATCAAG 3'
5′ CGCAGACCTAGGAAAGCTAGCTTACTTGTACAGCTCGTCCATGCC 3′
pUASt-attB-Col4a1wt-mScarlet was generated inserting a 15 kb fragment containing the Col4a1wt-mScarlet sequence from pUASt-Col4a1wt-mScarlet,8 into the linearized PacI-AvrII pUASt-attB plasmid using ligation T4 strategy (New England Biolabs, Inc.).
pUASt-attB-Col4a1D7s-mScarlet was generated by replacing a region of the 7s domain sequence of the pUASt-attB-Col4a1wt-mScarlet with a truncated version (Figure S4). A 950 bp fragment containing the 7s region was excised from the plasmid using XhoI and AsiSI sites and substituted by a 588 bp fragment (synthesized by Bio Basic USA, Inc.) containing the 7s truncated region, into the linearised XhoI-AsiSI pUASt-attB-Col4a1wt-mScarlet plasmid using ligation T4 strategy (New England Biolabs, Inc.).
The constructs were sequenced using the following sequencing primers:
5' CCCCGTAATGCAGAAGAAGA 3'
5' GACACTGGACTCGATGGACA 3'
pUASt-attB-Col4a1G552D-mScarlet was generated by replacing the sequence for the 552 Glycine of Col4a1wt sequence (GGC) of the pUASt-attB-Col4a1wt-mScarlet for a new sequence which produces an Aspartic acid (GAC). A 2003 bp region containing the wild-type version of 552 Glycine was excised from the plasmid using AsiSI and EcoNI sites and substituted by a 2003 bp fragment (synthesised by Bio Basic USA, Inc.) containing the sequence for 552 Aspartic, into the linearized AsiSI-EcoNI pUASt-attB-Col4a1wt-mScarlet plasmid using ligation T4 strategy (New England Biolabs, Inc.).
The constructs were sequenced using the following sequencing primers:
5' GACACTGGACTCGATGGACA 3'
5' GCTGGTATTCCCGGAGTTTC 3'
The plasmids obtained were injected into flies (BDSC 9744) which contain an attP-9A insertion at 3R chromosome (89E11) by BestGene.
Sample preparation and mounting for imaging
For all the confocal imaging, dechorionated embryos were mounted in a drop of Voltalef oil (VWR) between a glass coverslip covered with heptane glue and a gas-permeable Lumox culture dish (Sarstedt) as described previously.50 To image the embryos during stage 17 of embryogenesis on the confocal microscope, muscle myosin heavy chain (Mhc1) mutant embryos that do not twitch but have normal VNC condensation and expression of BM components were used as previously described.8 For the widefield imaging, the embryos were mounted in the same way but without heptane glue. For lattice light-sheet imaging, the dechorionated embryos were mounted on a 25 mm glass coverslip covered with heptane glue; the embryos were then covered with a drop of PBS and transferred to the microscope chamber, where imaging was performed in PBS. Temperature controlled experiments were performed by mounting the gas-permeable Lumox culture dish on a TOKAI HIT TP-CHS-C heating/cooling plate.
For the AFM experiments, embryos were prepared as previously described.9,51,52 After dechorionation with bleach, embryos were transferred to the heptane glue covered glass bottom of a 35 mm cell culture dish (FD35-100) which was then filled with 1x PBS. A cut was made along the dorsal midline of the embryos using an insect pin/needle, exposing the dorsal surface of the VNC.
Widefield and confocal microscopy
Widefield images were acquired every 2 min with an M205 fluorescent dissection microscope (Leica) equipped with a PLANAPO 2.0x objective. All the confocal imaging was performed using an LSM880 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss) equipped with a 63x NA 1.4 Plan-Apochromat oil objective unless stated otherwise. Tilescans (8 x 2 overlap 10%) of 40 mm Z-stacks with a zoom of 1.2 were used for PIV dynamics of the full VNC, with lateral view and temporal resolution of 10 min. For live imaging of Col4 and glia in the tail of the VNC, 20 mm Z-stacks of Col4a2-GFP and repo>LifeAct-mScarlet were acquired with a 63X objective with 2x zoom, and a temporal resolution of 5 min/frame using Optimal Airyscan mode. For simultaneous imaging of Col4 in head vs. tail of the VNC, multipoint acquisition consisting of 20 mm Z-stacks of Col4a2-GFP in head and tail regions of the same embryo were acquired with a 63X objective with 4x zoom, and a temporal resolution of 30 sec/frame using Super Resolution Airyscan mode. To visualize Col4 on the surface of the full VNC with a ventral view, tilescans (10 x 2 overlap 0%) of 20 mm Z-stacks were acquired on Super Resolution Airyscan mode with a zoom of 4. For volume measurements of the full VNC, two tiled images (overlap 10%) of 100 mm Z-stacks with a 20x air objective (Plan-Apochromat air objective, NA 0.8) were acquired with a temporal resolution of 10 min. Images were stitched using the Zen Black software and exported to the Imaris software (Bitplane) for further analysis.
Lattice light-sheet microscopy and patterned photobleaching
Lattice light-sheet imaging53,54 and photobleaching of the VNC was performed on the Multimodal Optical Scope with Adaptive Imaging Correction (MOSAIC) system developed at HHMI Janelia Research Campus (unpublished data). Experiments were performed at the HHMI Janelia Research Campus Advanced Imaging Center. For lattice light-sheet imaging, a Thorlabs 0.6 NA water dipping lens (TL20X-MPL) is used for excitation, and a Zeiss 1.0 NA water dipping objective (421452-9800) is used for detection. A square lattice pattern (Inner NA: 0.34; Outer NA: 0.4; Envelope: 3; Crop: 10) was used for generating the lattice light-sheet. Excitation was achieved via 488 nm and 560 nm laser lines, and emission was detected by two Hamamatsu Orca Flash 4.0 sCMOS cameras (dichroic: Semrock Di03-R561-t3-32x40; emissions filters: Camera 1 – Semrock 520/35 nm bandpass filter FF01-520/35-25, Semrock 561 nm notch filter NF03-561E-25; Camera 2 - Semrock 617/73 nm bandpass filter FF02-617/73-25). A system correction for the excitation and detection paths was performed as previously described.54 To image the entire depth of the VNC, a 2x2x2 tiled acquisition was performed using the “Z galvo & DO XZ stage” motion, wherein the sample stage is moved directly in line with the optical axis of the detection objective (Single tile size: 512 x 1500 x 201 voxels; voxel size: 108 x 108 x 250 nm; 50 ms per frame, total time between volumes: 5 minutes). To image the surface of the VNC, a 1x2x1 tiled acquisition was performed using the “X Stage” motion, wherein the sample stage is scanned laterally at an angle of 32.45⁰ relative to the optical axis of the detection objective (Single tile size: 512 x 1500 x 251 voxels; voxel size after deskewing: 108 x 108 x 268 nm; 50 ms per frame, total time between volumes: 2 minutes).
The 1x2x1 tiling was used for the photobleaching experiments. Prior to photobleaching, a single, tiled lattice light-sheet volume was collected. The MOSAIC configuration was then automatically switched to a custom point-scanning configuration in which a single Gaussian beam was passed through the lattice light-sheet excitation objective. This beam was dithered in both directions orthogonal to its propagation axis while simultaneously moving the sample stage in the direction of the optical axis of the excitation objective, resulting in a photobleached stripe of approximately 20 μm width perpendicular to the VNC midline. A total of 5 stripes were photobleached along the VNC midline, spaced at approximately 50 μm from each other. After the 5 stripes were photobleached, the MOSAIC configuration was automatically switched back to the lattice light-sheet imaging configuration for subsequent tiled, volumetric imaging as described above.
Atomic force microscopy (AFM)
Spherical tipped cantilevers were produced by gluing a 10 μm silica bead at the extremity of qp-CONT probes (Nanosensors). The cantilever spring constant was calibrated in liquid by thermal noise method (0.2 N/m). Measurements were performed using a custom-built system,55 based on a standard inverted microscope (Axio Observer.Z1, Zeiss) and equipped with an atomic force microscope (NanoWizard 3, JPK Instruments).
Force spectroscopy measurements using a 3 nN set point were performed on the VNC towards the head side of the tissue.
Quantification and statistical analysis
Lattice light-sheet imaging pre-processing
For lattice light-sheet movies acquired with x stage motion, deskewing is required to reconstruct the stacks in the z direction by correcting the shearing of the data during acquisition.53 The pipeline employed to this aim can be found here: https://github.com/aicjanelia/LLSM.
Tilescan stitching used the stitching-spark pipeline developed by the Saalfeld group (https://github.com/saalfeldlab/stitching-spark). The first time point of each dataset was stitched using a Fourier Shift Transform to find the best possible overlap between tiles.56 The stitched tile positions from this initial time point were then used for all other time points in the series. The entire time series was exported as blended images for further visualization and analysis.
To run particle image velocimetry (PIV) analysis on lattice light-sheet movies encompassing the whole VNC tissue from the ventral view, 3D segmentation of the tissue was required to remove unwanted signal from imaging planes outside the VNC. To this aim, a segmentation pipeline was implemented, where segmentation is performed manually in MATLAB by drawing polygons around the tissue on sparse z-planes (1 every 20 z-slices) for each time point. By using the segmented planes, a triangulated volume is created and re-sliced to obtain segmentation of intermediate slices.
VNC condensation and Col4 levels quantification by fluorescent dissection microscope
For the quantification of VNC condensation, the last position of the tail of the VNC was manually tracked on every frame (2 min time resolution) by using Fiji.57 The x and y coordinates of each point were stored and compared to the initial position of the VNC tail to quantify displacement through time.
For the quantification of relative Col4a2-GFP-trap levels through time (2 min time resolution), the average raw fluorescence intensity of each embryo in every frame was measured with Fiji, the acquired data were smoothed by calculating a 10-frame moving average.
Volume and surface measurements
To visualise the VNC and measure its volume, the glial cells of the VNC were labelled with UAS-LifeAct-mScarlet under the expression of the glia driver repo-Gal4. To determine the 3 timepoints relevant to the condensation process we proceeded as follows: the beginning of the 1st phase of condensation was determined as the first frame in which displacement of the VNC tail was observed; the end of the 1st phase was determined as 3 hours from the beginning of the 1st phase; and the end of the 2nd phase as 9 hours from the end of the 1st phase. After the frames were selected, each peripheral nerve sprouting from the VNC was manually deleted, by using the “Surface” function in Imaris and by turning the voxels from the magenta channel into zero in the selected areas. Subsequently, the volume of the VNC was obtained by generating a surface on the magenta channel with a voxel of size 2. The length, width, and height of the VNC were quantified with the Imaris function “Measurement Points”. For each embryo, the average height and width were measured at the central point of each neuromere of the VNC. We used the measured VNC dimensions to calculate the change in surface area, using an idealized shape resembling an elliptical cylinder.
Quantification of fluorescence intensity in the surface of the VNC
To quantify the Col4 gradient on the VNC surface from confocal images, we first removed the signal from the intra-cellular Col4a2-GFP inside hemocytes by discarding any signal higher than 70% of the total fluorescence intensity. We then calculated the average signal across the VNC from head to tail smoothed with a walking average over 200 μm.
Particle image velocimetry (PIV) analysis
PIV was performed with a custom MATLAB suite (https://github.com/stemarcotti/PIV) as in Davis et al.58 and Yolland et al.59 This methodology was applied on maximum intensity projected time series confocal and lattice light-sheet imaging of the VNC and was used to track the motion on the VNC surface over time. Briefly, the algorithm cross-correlates a small region of interest in a frame of reference (source area) to a larger portion of the subsequent time frame (search area), to find the best match. This operation is performed iteratively on all portions of the image at each time frame to allow for feature tracking in the entire field of view. The parameters were optimized as follows: source size 9 μm, search size 16 μm, grid size 5 μm, correlation threshold 0.5, when the entire VNC was imaged with confocal microscopy; source size 2 μm, search size 4 μm, grid size 1 μm, correlation threshold 0.3, when only a portion of the VNC was imaged with high spatiotemporal resolution with confocal microscopy; source size 5 μm, search size 10 μm, grid size 3 μm, correlation threshold 0.5, when the entire VNC was imaged on the MOSAIC system.
The obtained displacement vector field was then interpolated both spatially and temporally. The interpolation kernel parameters were set as follows: spatial kernel size 50 μm (sigma 10 μm), temporal kernel size 90 min (sigma 40 min), when the entire VNC was imaged with confocal microscopy and the MOSAIC system; spatial kernel size 10 μm (sigma 2 μm), temporal kernel size 5 frames (sigma 2 frames), when only a portion of the VNC was imaged with high spatiotemporal resolution with confocal microscopy. All colourmaps presented were generated to visualize the magnitude of feature velocity, and vectors from the interpolated field were overlaid to highlight flow direction. An average of the velocity magnitude or x component across the length of the VNC was calculated for each frame to plot kymographs.
PIV local alignment correlation
To evaluate the coherence of motion for collagen and glia, 256 random locations were selected on the non-interpolated PIV displacement vector field for each time frame. The displacement vector at each of these locations was considered as a reference, and its orientation was compared to all the neighbouring vectors over an 8 μm radius. This was done by calculating the norm of the cosine of the angle theta between the reference vector and each of the neighbouring vectors, and by subsequently obtaining an average across all these comparisons for each location. The computed cosine values were smoothed with a walking average over 5 frames (25 min). Values close to 1 indicate similar orientation between the reference and its neighbours, representing high motion coherence.
A similar approach was taken to measure the coherence of motion for collagen in the tail-to-head direction for two distinct locations at the head and tail of the VNC. For each frame, the direction of 11x11 vectors over a 3 μm-spaced grid of the interpolated PIV field was compared to the reference direction, i.e., tail-to-head direction. The cosine of the angle theta between each vector and the reference vector was calculated as a measure of coherence of motion in the tail-to-head direction, and an average calculated for each frame. Values close to 1 indicate motion in the tail-to-head direction.
Cell tracking
Confocal time-lapse movies of the glial cells forming the VNC containing labelled nuclei were tracked with the Imaris function “Spots”. The tracking was divided in two areas, anterior (head) and posterior (tail), which were defined as half of the VNC at the end of the initial 3 hours of VNC condensation. Two 3-hour periods were chosen in the first and second phase, respectively (0-3 hours and 7-10 hours from the start of VNC condensation).
The obtained tracks were analysed with custom software in MATLAB to obtain information on their directionality. The start and end (x,y) coordinates of each track within these time periods which was longer than 10 frames (100 min) were extracted. A vector was drawn between each start and end location and its angle computed to display the polar histograms (angles corresponding to zero were set on the horizontal axis from head to tail). 81 and 130 tracks were analysed for the first phase for head and tail, respectively; 219 and 206 tracks were analysed for the second phase for head and tail, respectively. The mean average velocity of all the tracks with a minimum length of 10 frames (100 min) in both areas was obtained from the Imaris function “Spots”.
Analysis of photobleaching
To analyse the anisotropic motion of the VNC when photobleaching stripes across the tissue, a line was drawn in Fiji with thickness 100 px along the midline of the VNC (perpendicular to the stripes). Intensity of the signal in the region highlighted by the linescan was obtained at two different timepoints (immediately and 30 min after photobleaching), normalised and averaged across a moving window of 150 datapoints. The five local minima corresponding to centre of the stripe were automatically located in MATLAB and used to visualized the anisotropic motion from tail to head of the tissue.
Eccentricity of VNC cross-sections
MOSAIC movies of the whole VNC with glial cells labelled were used to evaluate the eccentricity of the tissue cross-section. 3D reconstructions were obtained in Imaris and regions corresponding to 3 separate neuromers were selected for two time-points representing stage 15 and 17 of embryo development. Manual segmentation of the tissue was performed in Fiji, and the outlines were centred and aligned to the horizontal axis in MATLAB for visualisation purposes. The eccentricity was calculated in MATLAB as the ratio of the distance between the foci of the ellipse fitting the VNC outline and its major axis length. Values for eccentricity can vary between 0 (circle) and 1 (line).
AFM analysis
Analysis of the force spectroscopy curves to obtain the effective modulus was carried out in MATLAB by using custom-made algorithms as described in Marcotti et al.,60 considering a target indentation depth for the Hertz model fitting of 230 nm.
Statistics and reproducibility
Statistical tests employed are listed in the caption of relevant figure panels. Significance was indicated as follows: ‘∗∗∗∗’ for p-values lower than 0.0001, ‘∗∗∗’ lower than 0.001, ‘∗∗’ lower than 0.01, ‘∗’ lower than 0.05, ‘ns’ otherwise.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Nir Gov, Rachel Lennon, Roberto Mayor, Patrick Mesquida, and David Sherwood for advice on the manuscript and Welcome Bender for the parasegmental driver. This research was funded by the Wellcome Trust (grant number 107859/Z/15/Z) (B.M.S. and B.J.S.-S.), the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement no. 681808) (B.M.S. and S.M.), and the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT), México (E.S.-M.). The Advanced Imaging Center at Janelia Research Campus is supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.
Author contributions
Conceptualization, E.S.-M., B.J.S.-S., S.M., and B.M.S.; methodology, E.S.-M., B.J.S.-S., S.M., M.M., B.M.S., C.M.H., R.M.L., and T.-L.C.; investigation, E.S.-M., B.J.S.-S., S.M., A.B., A.D., L.M.H., M.-d.-C.D.-d.-l.-L., M.M., S.C., E.R., B.M.S., C.M.H., and R.M.L.; funding acquisition, B.M.S. and T.-L.C.; project administration, E.S.-M. and B.M.S.; writing – original draft, B.M.S.; writing – review & editing, E.S.-M., B.J.S.-S., S.M., and B.M.S.
Declaration of interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Published: April 21, 2023
Footnotes
Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2023.03.019.
Supplemental information
Data and code availability
Microscopy data reported in this paper will be shared by the lead contact upon reasonable request. The code is deposited in publicly available repositories as specified in the relevant sections below. Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.
References
- 1.Gilbert S.F. Sixth Edition. Sinauer Associates; 2000. Developmental Biology. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Walma D.A.C., Yamada K.M. The extracellular matrix in development. Development. 2020;147 doi: 10.1242/dev.175596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Munjal A., Hannezo E., Tsai T.Y., Mitchison T.J., Megason S.G. Extracellular hyaluronate pressure shaped by cellular tethers drives tissue morphogenesis. Cell. 2021;184:6313–6325.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.11.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Loganathan R., Rongish B.J., Smith C.M., Filla M.B., Czirok A., Bénazéraf B., Little C.D. Extracellular matrix motion and early morphogenesis. Development. 2016;143:2056–2065. doi: 10.1242/dev.127886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Newman S.A., Frenz D.A., Tomasek J.J., Rabuzzi D.D. Matrix-driven translocation of cells and nonliving particles. Science. 1985;228:885–889. doi: 10.1126/science.4001925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Newman S.A., Frenz D.A., Hasegawa E., Akiyama S.K. Matrix-driven translocation: dependence on interaction of amino-terminal domain of fibronectin with heparin-like surface components of cells or particles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1987;84:4791–4795. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.14.4791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zamir E.A., Rongish B.J., Little C.D. The ECM moves during primitive streak formation--computation of ECM versus cellular motion. PLoS Biol. 2008;6 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Matsubayashi Y., Sánchez-Sánchez B.J., Marcotti S., Serna-Morales E., Dragu A., Díaz-de-la-Loza M.D., Vizcay-Barrena G., Fleck R.A., Stramer B.M. Rapid homeostatic turnover of embryonic ECM during tissue morphogenesis. Dev. Cell. 2020;54:33–42.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Matsubayashi Y., Louani A., Dragu A., Sánchez-Sánchez B.J., Serna-Morales E., Yolland L., Gyoergy A., Vizcay G., Fleck R.A., Heddleston J.M., et al. A moving source of matrix components is essential for de novo basement membrane formation. Curr. Biol. 2017;27:3526–3534.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tiwari P., Rengarajan H., Saunders T.E. Scaling of internal organs during drosophila embryonic development. Biophys. J. 2021;120:4264–4276. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.05.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Olofsson B., Page D.T. Condensation of the central nervous system in embryonic Drosophila is inhibited by blocking hemocyte migration or neural activity. Dev. Biol. 2005;279:233–243. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Karkali K., Tiwari P., Singh A., Tlili S., Jorba I., Navajas D., Muñoz J.J., Saunders T.E., Martin-Blanco E. Condensation of the Drosophila nerve cord is oscillatory and depends on coordinated mechanical interactions. Dev. Cell. 2022;57:867–882.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2022.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Borchiellini C., Coulon J., Le Parco Y. The function of type IV collagen during Drosophila muscle development. Mech. Dev. 1996;58:179–191. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(96)00574-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Urbano J.M., Torgler C.N., Molnar C., Tepass U., López-Varea A., Brown N.H., de Celis J.F., Martín-Bermudo M.D. Drosophila laminins act as key regulators of basement membrane assembly and morphogenesis. Development. 2009;136:4165–4176. doi: 10.1242/dev.044263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Crest J., Diz-Muñoz A., Chen D.Y., Fletcher D.A., Bilder D. Organ sculpting by patterned extracellular matrix stiffness. eLife. 2017;6 doi: 10.7554/eLife.24958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Töpfer U., Guerra Santillán K.Y., Fischer-Friedrich E., Dahmann C. Distinct contributions of ECM proteins to basement membrane mechanical properties in Drosophila. Development. 2022;149 doi: 10.1242/dev.200456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pastor-Pareja J.C., Wu M., Xu T. An innate immune response of blood cells to tumors and tissue damage in Drosophila. Dis. Model. Mech. 2008;1:144–154. doi: 10.1242/dmm.000950. discussion 153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sui L., Alt S., Weigert M., Dye N., Eaton S., Jug F., Myers E.W., Jülicher F., Salbreux G., Dahmann C. Differential lateral and basal tension drive folding of Drosophila wing discs through two distinct mechanisms. Nat. Commun. 2018;9 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06497-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Page D.T., Olofsson B. Multiple roles for apoptosis facilitating condensation of the Drosophila ventral nerve cord. Genesis. 2008;46:61–68. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Freund L.B., Suresh S. 1st Pbk. Edition. Cambridge University Press; 2009. Thin Film Materials: Stress, Defect Formation, and Surface Evolution. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Schwabe T., Bainton R.J., Fetter R.D., Heberlein U., Gaul U. GPCR signaling is required for blood-brain barrier formation in drosophila. Cell. 2005;123:133–144. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Schwabe T., Li X., Gaul U. Dynamic analysis of the mesenchymal-epithelial transition of blood-brain barrier forming glia in Drosophila. Biol. Open. 2017;6:232–243. doi: 10.1242/bio.020669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bowman S.K., Deaton A.M., Domingues H., Wang P.I., Sadreyev R.I., Kingston R.E., Bender W. H3K27 modifications define segmental regulatory domains in the Drosophila bithorax complex. eLife. 2014;3 doi: 10.7554/eLife.02833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kelemen-Valkony I., Kiss M., Csiha J., Kiss A., Bircher U., Szidonya J., Maróy P., Juhász G., Komonyi O., Csiszár K., et al. Drosophila basement membrane collagen col4a1 mutations cause severe myopathy. Matrix Biol. 2012;31:29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2011.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kiss M., Kiss A.A., Radics M., Popovics N., Hermesz E., Csiszár K., Mink M. Drosophila type IV collagen mutation associates with immune system activation and intestinal dysfunction. Matrix Biol. 2016;49:120–131. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2015.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Duncan K.G., Fessler L.I., Bächinger H.P., Fessler J.H. Procollagen IV. Association to tetramers. J. Biol. Chem. 1983;258:5869–5877. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Siebold B., Qian R.A., Glanville R.W., Hofmann H., Deutzmann R., Kühn K. Construction of a model for the aggregation and cross-linking region (7S domain) of type IV collagen based upon an evaluation of the primary structure of the alpha 1 and alpha 2 chains in this region. Eur. J. Biochem. 1987;168:569–575. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1987.tb13455.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Horne-Badovinac S. Mobilizing the matrix for organ morphogenesis. Dev. Cell. 2020;54:1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Keeley D.P., Hastie E., Jayadev R., Kelley L.C., Chi Q., Payne S.G., Jeger J.L., Hoffman B.D., Sherwood D.R. Comprehensive endogenous tagging of basement membrane components reveals dynamic movement within the matrix scaffolding. Dev. Cell. 2020;54:60–74.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.05.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yurchenco P.D., Furthmayr H. Self-assembly of basement membrane collagen. Biochemistry. 1984;23:1839–1850. doi: 10.1021/bi00303a040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yurchenco P.D., Tsilibary E.C., Charonis A.S., Furthmayr H. Models for the self-assembly of basement membrane. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1986;34:93–102. doi: 10.1177/34.1.3510247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Thompson D.W. Cambridge University Press; 1961. On Growth and Form. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lecuit T., Lenne P.F. Cell surface mechanics and the control of cell shape, tissue patterns and morphogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007;8:633–644. doi: 10.1038/nrm2222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nerger B.A., Brun P.T., Nelson C.M. Marangoni flows drive the alignment of fibrillar cell-laden hydrogels. Sci. Adv. 2020;6 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz7748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Francis L.F., McCormick A.V., Vaessen D.M., Payne J.A. Development and measurement of stress in polymer coatings. J. Mater. Sci. 2002;37:4717–4731. doi: 10.1023/A:1020886802632. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Szabó A., Rupp P.A., Rongish B.J., Little C.D., Czirók A. Extracellular matrix fluctuations during early embryogenesis. Phys. Biol. 2011;8 doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/8/4/045006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Luo L., Liao Y.J., Jan L.Y., Jan Y.N. Distinct morphogenetic functions of similar small GTPases: drosophila Drac1 is involved in axonal outgrowth and myoblast fusion. Genes Dev. 1994;8:1787–1802. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.15.1787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zanet J., Jayo A., Plaza S., Millard T., Parsons M., Stramer B. Fascin promotes filopodia formation independent of its role in actin bundling. J. Cell Biol. 2012;197:477–486. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201110135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Page-McCaw A., Serano J., Santé J.M., Rubin G.M. Drosophila matrix metalloproteinases are required for tissue remodeling, but not embryonic development. Dev. Cell. 2003;4:95–106. doi: 10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00400-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Franke J.D., Montague R.A., Kiehart D.P. Nonmuscle myosin II generates forces that transmit tension and drive contraction in multiple tissues during dorsal closure. Curr. Biol. 2005;15:2208–2221. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.11.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Van de Bor V., Zimniak G., Papone L., Cerezo D., Malbouyres M., Juan T., Ruggiero F., Noselli S. Companion blood cells control ovarian stem cell niche microenvironment and homeostasis. Cell Rep. 2015;13:546–560. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Buszczak M., Paterno S., Lighthouse D., Bachman J., Planck J., Owen S., Skora A.D., Nystul T.G., Ohlstein B., Allen A., et al. The carnegie protein trap library: a versatile tool for Drosophila developmental studies. Genetics. 2007;175:1505–1531. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.065961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kohsaka H., Takasu E., Nose A. In vivo induction of postsynaptic molecular assembly by the cell adhesion molecule Fasciclin2. J. Cell Biol. 2007;179:1289–1300. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200705154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gyoergy A., Roblek M., Ratheesh A., Valoskova K., Belyaeva V., Wachner S., Matsubayashi Y., Sánchez-Sánchez B.J., Stramer B., Siekhaus D.E. Tools allowing independent visualization and genetic manipulation of Drosophila melanogaster macrophages and surrounding tissues. G3 (Bethesda) 2018;8:845–857. doi: 10.1534/g3.117.300452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Morin X., Daneman R., Zavortink M., Chia W. A protein trap strategy to detect GFP-tagged proteins expressed from their endogenous loci in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2001;98:15050–15055. doi: 10.1073/pnas.261408198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Voigt A., Pflanz R., Schäfer U., Jäckle H. Perlecan participates in proliferation activation of quiescent Drosophila neuroblasts. Dev. Dyn. 2002;224:403–412. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.10120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rehorn K.P., Thelen H., Michelson A.M., Reuter R. A molecular aspect of hematopoiesis and endoderm development common to vertebrates and Drosophila. Development. 1996;122:4023–4031. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.12.4023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sepp K.J., Auld V.J. Conversion of lacZ enhancer trap lines to GAL4 lines using targeted transposition in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1999;151:1093–1101. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.3.1093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bindels D.S., Haarbosch L., van Weeren L., Postma M., Wiese K.E., Mastop M., Aumonier S., Gotthard G., Royant A., Hink M.A., et al. mScarlet: a bright monomeric red fluorescent protein for cellular imaging. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:53–56. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Davis J.R., Huang C.Y., Zanet J., Harrison S., Rosten E., Cox S., Soong D.Y., Dunn G.A., Stramer B.M. Emergence of embryonic pattern through contact inhibition of locomotion. Development. 2012;139:4555–4560. doi: 10.1242/dev.082248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lee H.K., Wright A.P., Zinn K. Live dissection of Drosophila embryos: streamlined methods for screening mutant collections by antibody staining. J. Vis. Exp. 2009;34 doi: 10.3791/1647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Sánchez-Sánchez B.J., Urbano J.M., Comber K., Dragu A., Wood W., Stramer B., Martín-Bermudo M.D. Drosophila embryonic hemocytes produce laminins to strengthen migratory response. Cell Rep. 2017;21:1461–1470. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chen B.C., Legant W.R., Wang K., Shao L., Milkie D.E., Davidson M.W., Janetopoulos C., Wu X.S., Hammer J.A., 3rd, Liu Z., et al. Lattice light-sheet microscopy: imaging molecules to embryos at high spatiotemporal resolution. Science. 2014;346 doi: 10.1126/science.1257998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Liu T.L., Upadhyayula S., Milkie D.E., Singh V., Wang K., Swinburne I.A., Mosaliganti K.R., Collins Z.M., Hiscock T.W., Shea J., et al. Observing the cell in its native state: imaging subcellular dynamics in multicellular organisms. Science. 2018;360 doi: 10.1126/science.aaq1392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hirvonen L.M., Marsh R.J., Jones G.E., Cox S. Combined AFM and super-resolution localisation microscopy: investigating the structure and dynamics of podosomes. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2020;99 doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2020.151106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Preibisch S., Saalfeld S., Tomancak P. Globally optimal stitching of tiled 3D microscopic image acquisitions. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1463–1465. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Schindelin J., Arganda-Carreras I., Frise E., Kaynig V., Longair M., Pietzsch T., Preibisch S., Rueden C., Saalfeld S., Schmid B., et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Davis J.R., Luchici A., Mosis F., Thackery J., Salazar J.A., Mao Y., Dunn G.A., Betz T., Miodownik M., Stramer B.M. Inter-cellular forces orchestrate contact inhibition of locomotion. Cell. 2015;161:361–373. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Yolland L., Burki M., Marcotti S., Luchici A., Kenny F.N., Davis J.R., Serna-Morales E., Müller J., Sixt M., Davidson A., et al. Persistent and polarized global actin flow is essential for directionality during cell migration. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019;21:1370–1381. doi: 10.1038/s41556-019-0411-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Marcotti S., Reilly G.C., Lacroix D. Effect of cell sample size in atomic force microscopy nanoindentation. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2019;94:259–266. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Microscopy data reported in this paper will be shared by the lead contact upon reasonable request. The code is deposited in publicly available repositories as specified in the relevant sections below. Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.