Skip to main content
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1981 Sep;65(9):652–656. doi: 10.1136/bjo.65.9.652

Does the Catford drum give an accurate assessment of acuity?

J Atkinson, O Braddick, E Pimm-Smith, L Ayling, R Sawyer
PMCID: PMC1039616  PMID: 7295633

Abstract

Adult emmetropes and myopes were tested with the Catford drum and the results compared with subjective (Landolt C) acuity. For he emmetropes the Catford drum was found to overestimate visual acuity by a factor of approximately 4. For myopes, and emmetropes viewing through plus lenses, the discrepancies were much larger. Since the Catford drum not only overestimates acuity but will do so by a factor which varies for different visual disorders, caution is needed in clinical interpretation of results obtained with it.

Full text

PDF
653

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arden G. B. The importance of measuring contrast sensitivity in cases of visual disturbance. Br J Ophthalmol. 1978 Apr;62(4):198–209. doi: 10.1136/bjo.62.4.198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bodis-Wollner I., Diamond S. P. The measurement of spatial contrast sensitivity in cases of blurred vision associated with cerebral lesions. Brain. 1976 Dec;99(4):695–710. doi: 10.1093/brain/99.4.695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Catford G. V., Oliver A. Development of visual acuity. Arch Dis Child. 1973 Jan;48(1):47–50. doi: 10.1136/adc.48.1.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dobson V., Teller D. Y. Visual acuity in human infants: a review and comparison of behavioral and electrophysiological studies. Vision Res. 1978;18(11):1469–1483. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(78)90001-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Harris L., Atkinson J., Braddick O. Visual contrast sensitivity of a 6-month-old infant measured by the evoked potential. Nature. 1976 Dec 9;264(5586):570–571. doi: 10.1038/264570a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hess R. F. Contrast sensitivity assessment of functional amblyopia in humans. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1979;99(3):391–397. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hess R. F., Howell E. R. The threshold contrast sensitivity function in strabismic amblyopia: evidence for a two type classification. Vision Res. 1977;17(9):1049–1055. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(77)90009-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Khan S. G., Chen K. F., Frenkel M. Subjective and objective visual acuity testing techniques. Arch Ophthalmol. 1976 Dec;94(12):2086–2091. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1976.03910040746009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Levi D. M., Harwerth R. S. Spatio-temporal interactions in anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1977 Jan;16(1):90–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sokol S. Measurement of infant visual acuity from pattern reversal evoked potentials. Vision Res. 1978;18(1):33–39. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(78)90074-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES