Skip to main content
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1982 May;66(5):292–302. doi: 10.1136/bjo.66.5.292

Corneal graft rejection: a new rabbit model and cyclosporin-A.

P A Hunter, A Garner, K R Wilhelmus, N S Rice, B R Jones
PMCID: PMC1039783  PMID: 7041957

Abstract

In order to test the efficacy of topically applied cyclosporin-A in preventing corneal allograft rejection, existing rabbit models were modified to produce a new model in which the allograft reaction could be consistently initiated solely as a result of corneal transfer without any additional means of sensitisation. With this model, which reflects clinical corneal grafting more closely than many previous models, cyclosporin-A 1% drops applied to the recipient eye 5 times daily for 4 weeks inhibited corneal graft rejection. When cyclosporin-A 1% drops were applied to corneal allografts for 13 weeks, 44% of grafts remained clear 180 days after transplantation. No side effects were observed that could be attributed to topically applied cyclosporin-A.

Full text

PDF

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BABEL J., BOURQUIN J. B. Experimental research with corneal heterografts. Br J Ophthalmol. 1952 Oct;36(10):529–536. doi: 10.1136/bjo.36.10.529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BILLINGHAM R. E., BOSWELL T. Studies on the problem of corneal homografts. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1953 Jul 15;141(904):392–406. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1953.0049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Castroviejo R. Keratoplasty-Microscopic Study of the Corneal Grafts. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1937;35:355–385. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coster D. J. Factors affecting the outcome of corneal transplantation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1981 Mar;63(2):91–97. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Coster D. J., Shepherd W. F., Fook T. C., Rice N. S., Jones B. R. Prolonged survival of corneal allografts in rabbits treated with cyclosporin A. Lancet. 1979 Sep 29;2(8144):688–689. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(79)92082-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ehlers N., Ahrons S. Corneal transplantation and histocompatibility. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1971;49(4):513–527. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1971.tb02957.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Foster C. S., Allansmith M. R. Lack of blood group antigen A on human corneal endothelium. Am J Ophthalmol. 1979 Feb;87(2):165–170. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(79)90136-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Green C. J., Allison A. C., Precious S. Induction of specific tolerance in rabbits by kidney allografting and short periods of cyclosporin-A treatment. Lancet. 1979 Jul 21;2(8134):123–125. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(79)90005-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Khodadoust A. A. Lamellar corneal transplantation in the rabbit. Am J Ophthalmol. 1968 Dec;66(6):1111–1117. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(68)90820-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lorenzetti D. W., Kaufman H. E. Experimental production of graft reactions with suppression by topical corticosteroids. Arch Ophthalmol. 1966 Aug;76(2):274–281. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1966.03850010276020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Polack F. M. Effect of azathioprine (imuran) on corneal graft reaction. Am J Ophthalmol. 1967 Aug;64(2):233–244. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(67)92517-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Salisbury J. D., Gebhardt B. M. Blood group antigens on human corneal cells demonstrated by immunoperoxidase staining. Am J Ophthalmol. 1981 Jan;91(1):46–50. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(81)90347-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Shepherd W. F., Coster D. J., Fook T. C., Rice N. S., Jones B. R. Effect of cyclosporin A on the survival of corneal grafts in rabbits. Br J Ophthalmol. 1980 Mar;64(3):148–153. doi: 10.1136/bjo.64.3.148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Stark W. J., Taylor H. R., Bias W. B., Maumenee A. E. Histocompatibility (HLA) antigens and keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1978 Nov;86(5):595–604. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(78)90174-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES