Skip to main content
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1984 Feb;68(2):79–84. doi: 10.1136/bjo.68.2.79

Retinal function in high refractive error assessed electroretinographically.

I Perlman, E Meyer, T Haim, S Zonis
PMCID: PMC1040262  PMID: 6691959

Abstract

The retinal function of patients with high refractive error was studied electroretinographically. Thirty-one hypermetropic patients, 7 myopic patients, and 7 patients with either unilateral or bilateral aphakia participated in the study. The ERG responses were measured in the light- and dark-adapted states. It was found that myopic eyes were characterised by subnormal amplitude but normal pattern, expressed by normal relationship between the b-wave amplitude and the a-wave amplitude. In aphakia the ERG responses were of normal amplitude and pattern. However, the hypermetropic patients could be divided into 3 groups. One group included subjects with a subnormal b-wave to a-wave relationship. The second group was characterised by a normal b- to a-wave relationship, while patients belonging to the third group exhibited supernormal b-wave to a-wave relationship. This classification of hypermetropic subjects did not correlate with the axial length of the eye or the refraction of the ocular media.

Full text

PDF
79

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BROWN K. T., WIESEL T. N. Localization of origins of electroretinogram components by intraretinal recording in the intact cat eye. J Physiol. 1961 Sep;158:257–280. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown K. T. The eclectroretinogram: its components and their origins. Vision Res. 1968 Jun;8(6):633–677. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(68)90041-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carr R. E., Ripps H., Siegel I. M., Weale R. A. Rhodopsin and the electrical activity of the retina in congenital night blindness. Invest Ophthalmol. 1966 Oct;5(5):497–507. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carr R. E., Ripps H., Siegel I. M., Weale R. A. Visual functions in congenital night blindness. Invest Ophthalmol. 1966 Oct;5(5):508–514. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hill D. A., Arbel K. F., Berson E. L. Cone electroretinograms in congenital nyctalopia with myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1974 Jul;78(1):127–136. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(74)90021-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lemagne J. M., Gagné S., Cortin P. Resistance in clinical electroretinography: its role in amplitude variability. Can J Ophthalmol. 1982 Apr;17(2):67–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Perlman I. Relationship between the amplitudes of the b wave and the a wave as a useful index for evaluating the electroretinogram. Br J Ophthalmol. 1983 Jul;67(7):443–448. doi: 10.1136/bjo.67.7.443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rodieck R. W. Components of the electroretinogram--a reappraisal. Vision Res. 1972 May;12(5):773–780. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(72)90003-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES