Skip to main content
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1990 Dec;74(12):712–716. doi: 10.1136/bjo.74.12.712

Peripheral contrast sensitivity in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

F Falcão-Reis 1, E O'Donoghue 1, R Buceti 1, R A Hitchings 1, G B Arden 1
PMCID: PMC1042273  PMID: 2275933

Abstract

Contrast sensitivity has been measured in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension, the latter graded into high, medium, and low risk clinical groups. Measurements were made centrally and peripherally at 10 degrees, 15 degrees, 20 degrees, and 25 degrees off-axis at each of the four meridians 45 degrees, 135 degrees, 225 degrees, and 315 degrees. A sine wave grating of 1.9 cycles/degree, reversing at 1 Hz was used. It was displayed on a 100-Hz refresh rate monitor. Normal values were established to compare those from 41 eyes from patients with either primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) with minimal field loss detectable on a Humphrey perimeter, or raised IOP and/or disc changes but no field loss (OH). Those with POAG had normal central contrast sensitivity, but at 20 degrees and 25 degrees eccentricity the values were greater than 2 standard deviations above the normal mean. This was also the case for high risk OH, but not for low risk patients. All the high risk patients except one who had abnormal peripheral contrast sensitivity had possible field defects (threshold elevation at one or more points more than 5 but less than 10 dB above normal mean). Only one of those with normal peripheral contrast sensitivity had such 'suspect points'. The results are assessed in terms of screening of glaucoma suspects.

Full text

PDF
715

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Airaksinen P. J., Lakowski R., Drance S. M., Price M. Color vision and retinal nerve fiber layer in early glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986 Feb 15;101(2):208–213. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(86)90597-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson D. R. Glaucoma: the damage caused by pressure. XLVI Edward Jackson memorial lecture. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989 Nov 15;108(5):485–495. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(89)90423-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arden G. B., Jacobson J. J. A simple grating test for contrast sensitivity: preliminary results indicate value in screening for glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1978 Jan;17(1):23–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Atkin A., Bodis-Wollner I., Wolkstein M., Moss A., Podos S. M. Abnormalities of central contrast sensitivity in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1979 Aug;88(2):205–211. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(79)90467-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Becker B., Morton W. R. Topical epinephrine in glaucoma suspects. Am J Ophthalmol. 1966 Aug;62(2):272–277. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(66)91483-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Drance S. M. Doyne Memorial Lecture, 1975. Correlation of optic nerve and visual field defects in simple glaucoma. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1975 Jul;95(2):288–296. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Epstein D. L., Krug J. H., Jr, Hertzmark E., Remis L. L., Edelstein D. J. A long-term clinical trial of timolol therapy versus no treatment in the management of glaucoma suspects. Ophthalmology. 1989 Oct;96(10):1460–1467. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(89)32688-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gündüz K., Arden G. B., Perry S., Weinstein G. W., Hitchings R. A. Color vision defects in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Quantification with a computer-driven color television system. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988 Jul;106(7):929–935. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1988.01060140075028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hart W. M., Jr, Silverman S. E., Trick G. L., Nesher R., Gordon M. O. Glaucomatous visual field damage. Luminance and color-contrast sensitivities. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990 Feb;31(2):359–367. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jay J. L., Allan D. The benefit of early trabeculectomy versus conventional management in primary open angle glaucoma relative to severity of disease. Eye (Lond) 1989;3(Pt 5):528–535. doi: 10.1038/eye.1989.84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Korth M., Horn F., Storck B., Jonas J. B. Spatial and spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity of normal and glaucoma eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1989;227(5):428–435. doi: 10.1007/BF02172893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lundh B. L., Lennerstrand G. Eccentric contrast sensitivity loss in glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1981 Feb;59(1):21–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1981.tb06705.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mundorf T. K., Zimmerman T. J., Nardin G. F., Kendall K. S. Automated perimetry, tonometry, and questionnaire in glaucoma screening. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989 Nov 15;108(5):505–508. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(89)90425-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Quigley H. A., Addicks E. M., Green W. R. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III. Quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982 Jan;100(1):135–146. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1982.01030030137016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Quigley H. A., Dunkelberger G. R., Green W. R. Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989 May 15;107(5):453–464. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(89)90488-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Regan D., Neima D. Low-contrast letter charts as a test of visual function. Ophthalmology. 1983 Oct;90(10):1192–1200. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(83)34407-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Trick G. L., Bickler-Bluth M., Cooper D. G., Kolker A. E., Nesher R. Pattern reversal electroretinogram (PRERG) abnormalities in ocular hypertension: correlation with glaucoma risk factors. Curr Eye Res. 1988 Feb;7(2):201–206. doi: 10.3109/02713688808995749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Vaegan, Halliday B. L. A forced-choice test improves clinical contrast sensitivity testing. Br J Ophthalmol. 1982 Aug;66(8):477–491. doi: 10.1136/bjo.66.8.477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Yablonski M. E., Zimmerman T. J., Kass M. A., Becker B. Prognostic significance of optic disk cupping in ocular hypertensive patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 1980 Apr;89(4):585–592. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(80)90071-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES