Skip to main content
The British Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to The British Journal of Ophthalmology
. 1979 Apr;63(4):238–242. doi: 10.1136/bjo.63.4.238

Refraction as a means of predicting squint or amblyopia in preschool siblings of children known to have these defects.

R M Ingram, C Walker
PMCID: PMC1043457  PMID: 435440

Abstract

215 preschool siblings of children presenting with squint/amblyopia were screened by refraction after cycloplegia. The presence of +2.00 or more D of spherical hypermetropia in both eyes, or +1.00 or more D sphere or cylinder of anisometropia was significantly associated (P=0.0779%) with that child being identified 2+ years later as having either squint or amblyopia or both. Astigmatism of +1.50 or more D in either eye was significantly associated with anisometropia (P=0.000 0013%). If bilateral hypermetropia of +2.00 or more DS and/or +1.50 or more D of astigmatism in either eye had been taken as criteria for abnormality (ignoring anisometropia), there was a more significant association (P=0.0025%) between refraction and squint/amblyopia in these siblings. Such a child had 4 times more chance of having a visual defect than one who had no error of refraction when screened. These findings suggest that an environmental factor such as blurred vision may be relatively more important as a cause of squint/amblyopia than a genetically determined neurological abnormality.

Full text

PDF
241

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ANDRE A., HACOURT J., MOUREAU P., WEEKERS R. Contribution à l'étiologie du strabisme concomitant et de l'amblyopie par l'étude de jumeaux uni- et bivitellins. Ophthalmologica. 1956 Oct;132(4):209–229. doi: 10.1159/000302929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Atkinson J., Braddick O., Moar K. Development of contrast sensitivity over the first 3 months of life in the human infant. Vision Res. 1977;17(9):1037–1044. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(77)90007-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. HIRSCH M. J. A skiascopic procedure for visual screening surveys. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1950 Dec;27(12):587–591. doi: 10.1097/00006324-195012000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ikeda H., Tremain K. E. Amblyopia resulting from penalisation: neurophysiological studies of kittens reared with atropinisation of one or both eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 1978 Jan;62(1):21–28. doi: 10.1136/bjo.62.1.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ingram R. M. Refraction as a basis for screening children for squint and amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 1977 Jan;61(1):8–15. doi: 10.1136/bjo.61.1.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ingram R. M., Traynar M. J., Walker C., Wilson J. M. Screening for refractive errors at age 1 year: a pilot study. Br J Ophthalmol. 1979 Apr;63(4):243–250. doi: 10.1136/bjo.63.4.243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kvapilíková K. Refrakcní vady u dvojcat. Cesk Oftalmol. 1970 Sep;26(5):282–287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. LITVINOVA M. P., VOLOKITENKO A. E., PIKALOVA L. D. REFRAKTSIIA I BINOCULIARNOE ZRENIE U DETE I DOSHKOL'NOGO VOZRASTA. Oftalmol Zh. 1964;19:87–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mitchell D. E., Freeman R. D., Millodot M., Haegerstrom G. Meridional amblyopia: evidence for modification of the human visual system by early visual experience. Vision Res. 1973 Mar;13(3):535–558. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(73)90023-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Seba J. Zur Methodik der objektiven Untersuchung schielverdächtiger Kleinkinder. Ophthalmologica. 1970;160(6):421–429. doi: 10.1159/000306048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sorsby A., Benjamin B. Modes of inheritance of errors of refraction. J Med Genet. 1973 Jun;10(2):161–164. doi: 10.1136/jmg.10.2.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sorsby A., Leary G. A., Fraser G. R. Family studies on ocular refraction and its components. J Med Genet. 1966 Dec;3(4):269–273. doi: 10.1136/jmg.3.4.269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. TYSER P. A., LETCHWORTH T. W. A study in visual defects in young children. Br Med J. 1949 Nov 5;2(4635):1022–1022. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4635.1022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Von Noorden G. K. Factors involved in the production of amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 1974 Mar;58(3):158–164. doi: 10.1136/bjo.58.3.158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Whitteridge D. The Bowman Lecture, 1977. The cortical contribution to binocular vision. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1977 Apr;97(1):39–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wiesel T. N., Hubel D. H. Ordered arrangement of orientation columns in monkeys lacking visual experience. J Comp Neurol. 1974 Dec 1;158(3):307–318. doi: 10.1002/cne.901580306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Winstanley R. A. Amblyopia may be preventable. Sight Sav Rev. 1966 Winter;36(4):212–215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES