Skip to main content
The Journal of Forensic Odonto-stomatology logoLink to The Journal of Forensic Odonto-stomatology
. 2023 Aug 1;41(2):30–41.

Artificial intelligence in forensic medicine and forensic dentistry

Marin Vodanović 1, 2, Marko Subašić 3, Denis Milošević 3, Ivan Galić 4, Hrvoje Brkić 1,2
PMCID: PMC10473456  PMID: 37634174

Abstract

This review article aims to highlight the current possibilities for applying Artificial Intelligence in modern forensic medicine and forensic dentistry and present the advantages and disadvantages of its use. For this purpose, the relevant academic literature was searched using PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus. The application of Artificial Intelligence in forensic medicine and forensic dentistry is still in its early stages. However, the possibilities are great, and the future will show what is applicable in daily practice. Artificial Intelligence will improve the accuracy and efficiency of work in forensic medicine and forensic dentistry; it can automate some tasks; and enhance the quality of evidence. Disadvantages of the application of Artificial Intelligence may be related to discrimination, transparency, accountability, privacy, security, ethics and others. Artificial Intelligence systems should be used as a support tool, not as a replacement for forensic experts.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence,

Keywords: Machine Learning,

Keywords: Forensic Medicine,

Keywords: Forensic Dentistry

INTRODUCTION

Artificial Intelligence increasingly permeates the lives of modern humans, and it is increasingly difficult to find areas where it is not present in at least some form. We find it in our smartphones, cars, aeroplanes, banks, healthcare, agriculture, science, entertainment, and almost everywhere; it is becoming, in some ways, frighteningly ubiquitous. All of this is not happening (at least for now) because Artificial Intelligence is so intelligent and superior, but instead because we humans are inventive, innovative, and curious, but also often lazy, too comfortable, and unwilling to look critically at the future.

The best and most recent example of this is Open Al ChatGPT. The chatbot ChatGPT (Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer) was introduced to the public in November 2022; from then until now, its use has spread rapidly around the world, gaining several million users in just a few weeks and is considered the fastest-growing application of all time. (1) People first recognized it as a new way of entertainment. However, they quickly realized how useful it could be. They started using it increasingly as a fast and reliable assistant in doing their daily work tasks, whose shortcomings were more or less rightly neglected compared to the benefits it offers. In a very short time, it became a topic of discussion in leading scientific journals such as Nature. (2) There is still debate about the extent to which it may be used, for example, in writing scientific articles and whether it should be cited as an author. Research has shown that Open Al ChatGPT can independently write a scientific summary at such a level of quality that human experts can no longer distinguish which summaries are written by humans and which by Artificial Intelligence. (3)

To gain a better grasp of Artificial Intelligence, it is essential to clarify the distinctions among Artificial Intelligence, deep learning, machine learning, and data science. Although these fields are interconnected, each has its own unique characteristics. Artificial Intelligence serves as the overarching domain, encompassing a wide range of techniques and methodologies designed to create intelligent machines capable of performing tasks that typically require human intelligence, such as visual perception, speech recognition, decision-making, and natural language processing. Within Artificial Intelligence, machine learning and deep learning operate as subsets. (4) Data science, on the other hand, draws from all of these fields to extract insights and knowledge from data.

Artificial Intelligence branches out into various areas, including expert systems, robotics, and natural language processing. Deep learning, a subfield of Artificial Intelligence, employs neural networks inspired by the structure of the human brain to acquire knowledge from vast datasets. By automatically identifying and extracting features from raw data like images, sounds, and text, deep learning algorithms can make predictions or decisions. Notable applications of deep learning encompass image recognition, speech recognition, and natural language processing.

Machine learning, another subfield of Artificial Intelligence, concentrates on developing algorithms and statistical models that enable computers to learn from data without explicit programming. Machine learning techniques can be supervised (learning from labeled data), unsupervised (learning from unlabeled data), or semi-supervised (learning from a combination of labeled and unlabeled data). Use cases for machine learning include recommendation systems, fraud detection, and predictive modeling.

Data science, an interdisciplinary domain, merges statistical and computational techniques with specialized knowledge in various fields to extract insights and knowledge from data. It encompasses a wide array of activities, including data acquisition, cleaning and preprocessing, exploratory data analysis, statistical modeling, and machine learning. Data science finds applications in diverse sectors such as healthcare, finance, social media, and e-commerce.

Various studies show that people's opinions about Artificial Intelligence are divided and that almost half of people fear it. In contrast, the other half enthusiastically welcome it in their daily use. (5)

Artificial Intelligence can be used in a variety of everyday applications, including:

  • · Personal assistants for smartphones such as Siri, Bixby, and Alexa

  • · Chatbots for online customer service

  • · Image and voice recognition in cameras and virtual assistants

  • · Recommendation systems in streaming services and e-commerce websites

  • · Fraud detection in banking and financial services

  • · Predictive maintenance in manufacturing and industry

  • · Self-driving cars and transportation

  • · Healthcare, e.g., medical diagnosis and personalized treatment plans

  • · Speech translation and natural language processing in communications.

These are just a few examples, but Artificial Intelligence has the potential to be used in many other areas as well.

The fears that Artificial Intelligence raises in people are mostly related to potential job loss, loss of privacy and lack of security, the possibility of misperceptions, lack of transparency, lack of understanding of how it works, lack of warmth and understanding that human contact provides, and numerous ethical issues that its application raises in everyday life. (6, 7)

Artificial Intelligence has long been used in various fields of medicine and dentistry. In medicine, it is used in radiology (810), in the diagnosis and treatment of various diseases and conditions (in gastroenterology (11), oncology (12), cardiology (13), dermatology (14), intensive care (15) and others), for new drug discovery and development (16), as an aid in clinical decision-making (17), in personalized medicine (18), for chronic disease monitoring (19), for predictive analysis (20), and, of course, in numerous medical researches (21). In dentistry, Artificial Intelligence is used in numerous fields (22), such as dental radiology (23, 24), dental diagnostics (25), dental therapy planning (26), orthodontics (27), dental prosthodontics (28), periodontology (29), endodontics (30), oral pathology (31), dental implantology (32), dental robotics (33), and other areas of dentistry (3437).

A broader practical application of Artificial Intelligence in forensic medicine and forensic dentistry has yet to emerge. This paper aims highlight the current possibilities of applying Artificial Intelligence in modern forensic medicine and forensic dentistry. For this purpose, the relevant academic literature was searched using PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus. The keywords for searching these databases were: Artificial Intelligence; Machine Learning; Forensic Medicine; Forensic Dentistry. This review paper analysed and used articles that met the stated conditions. All articles used are listed in the reference list.

APPLICATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FORENSIC MEDICINE

Forensic medicine is a branch of medicine that combines medicine and law. It involves the application of medical knowledge, skills, and competencies for judicial and legal purposes, which may or may not include criminal matters. For example, forensic medicine is concerned with, among other things, the investigation of deaths (forensic thanatology), the determination of the cause of injury or death, the examination of evidence, the examination of living persons, e.g., in cases of sexual offences, the preparation of wound reports, age estimation, and the assessment of the physical and mental condition of persons involved in legal cases.

Considering that Artificial Intelligence has long been used in medicine, but also in law, where it is already widely used to find relevant documents and evidence in legal disputes, it is logical to expect its application in forensic medicine. (38, 39)

Artificial Intelligence can be used in forensic medicine and related fields in several ways (40):

  • · Autopsy analysis: Artificial Intelligence algorithms can be used to analyze medical images, and help identify injury patterns, diseases, postmortem interval estimation, and cause of death. (4044)

  • · Age and sex estimation: Artificial Intelligence can be trained to assist forensic experts in age estimation based on various parameters. (45, 46)

  • · Facial recognition: Artificial Intelligence algorithms can be trained to recognize facial features at crime scenes and compare them to a database of known offenders. (4751)

  • · Forensic toxicology: Artificial Intelligence can analyze the sample more accurately, and the method will be less time-consuming than the traditional way of analysis and can also be combined with robotics to automate some aspects of toxicology testing. (40, 52)

  • · DNA analysis and "omics" data mining: omics is the suffix used in various branches of biology such as genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, toxicogenomics, etc.; Artificial Intelligence can be used for more efficient investigation of such data. (40, 53, 54)

  • · Fingerprint analysis: Artificial Intelligence can be used to automate the process of fingerprint analysis and match fingerprints found at a crime scene with those in a database. (55)

  • · Gunshot analysis: Artificial Intelligence algorithms can analyze audio recordings of gunshots to determine the type of firearm used and the number of shots fired. (56, 57)

  • · Digital forensics: Artificial Intelligence can be used to analyze digital devices and data to uncover hidden evidence and track criminal activity. (58, 59)

Overall, Artificial Intelligence can help forensic professionals work more efficiently, accurately, and objectively, leading to better investigative results. (6062)

APPLICATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FORENSIC DENTISTRY

As in forensic medicine, Artificial Intelligence is increasingly used in forensic dentistry. Although this is mainly a practical application with a relatively narrow purpose, there are also examples, albeit rare, where Artificial Intelligence has become almost commonplace in the work of forensic dentists. Artificial Intelligence-based technologies used in forensic dentistry include deep neural networks, Artificial neural networks, machine learning, and computer technology. (63)

Artificial Intelligence can be used in a variety of ways to improve forensic dentistry, including:

  • · Dental identification: Artificial Intelligence can assist forensic dentists in analyzing dental images, such as radiographs, in identifying and matching individuals based on their teeth and jaws. (6468)

  • · Age and sex estimation: Artificial Intelligence can be used to analyze dental images to help forensic dentists estimate the age and sex of individuals. (67, 69)

  • · Facial reconstruction: Artificial Intelligence can be used to create 3D models of teeth and jaws for use in the facial reconstruction of unidentified remains. (70)

  • · Bite mark analysis: Artificial Intelligence can be used to analyze and match bite marks that can be used as evidence in criminal cases. (67)

  • · Dental databases: Artificial Intelligence can be used to search and match dental data in databases, which can help identify individuals.

  • · Chatbots: Artificial Intelligence-powered chatbots can be used to answer questions and educate people about forensic dentistry.

  • · Automation of tasks: Artificial Intelligence can be used to automate specific tasks such as dental image analysis, reducing the need for manual human labour and increasing the speed and accuracy of identification. (71)

Artificial Intelligence is a technology still evolving in forensic dentistry, and its utility depends on the particular use case and implementation. It is also essential that adequate regulations and controls are in place to ensure that AI systems are safe, effective, and ethical.

APPLICATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN AGE ESTIMATION

Age determination is a necessary procedure in forensic medicine and forensic dentistry. The appropriate procedure choice depends on many factors, including the material available for analysis, the time and facilities available, and, of course, the experience of the expert. No ideal, universal method for age estimation can be applied universally.

One of the goals of forensic work is to estimate the age of individuals in order to establish their biological profile, which is critical in criminal investigations and disaster scenarios because skeletal remains are often fragmented and complex to identify. (72) Both anthropological methods and new biochemical techniques must be used to to estimate age accurately. For subadult individuals, age is estimated using forensic anthropology and dentistry methods based on changes in bones and teeth caused by growth and development. In contrast, age estimation in adults is based primarily on degenerative changes in bones and teeth and is less accurate than in subadult individuals. Because age estimation becomes less accurate with age, alternative methods have been developed to estimate adult age by examining biochemical changes resulting from the physiological ageing process. While these biochemical methods are accurate, they also have limitations. Therefore, the combined use of anthropological and biochemical methods can lead to more accurate age estimation. (73)

An ideal age estimation method should have the following characteristics:

Accuracy, reliability, noninvasiveness, ease of use, inclusiveness, acceptability, privacy, cost-effectiveness, and speed. Accuracy: The method should provide accurate results consistent with actual age. Reliability: Results should be consistent regardless of the individual or circumstances and should not vary significantly from one measurement to the next. Non-invasive: The method should be non-invasive, i.e. nobody samples should be taken, or the person should not be exposed to harmful substances. Easy to use: The method should be easy to use, requiring minimal training and resources and no special equipment. Comprehensive: The method should be able to estimate the age of individuals from a wide range of age groups, races, and ethnicities. Acceptability: The method should be socially and culturally acceptable to the individual and should not discriminate against any particular group. Privacy: The method should protect the individual's privacy and not reveal personal information beyond age. Cost-effectiveness: The method should be cost-effective and not require a significant financial investment. Speed: The method should produce results in a reasonable amount of time without undue delay or inconvenience to the individual. (74) The methods most commonly used by forensic anthropologists to estimate age in adults are based on examination of the pubic symphysis, sternal rib end, the auricular surface of the ilium, teeth, and cranial sutures. (75) Several parameters are used in forensic dentistry for age estimation in adults. These include tooth wear, absence/presence of wisdom teeth, a fusion of cranial sutures (palatal), degeneration of jaw bones, radiographic appearance of tooth roots on radiographs, transparency of root dentin, presence of secondary dentin, etc. (76) In addition, for age estimation in subadult individuals in forensic dentistry, we can use the development and eruption of deciduous and permanent teeth and the degree of root development, including the closure of the apical foramen. (77)

Artificial Intelligence can be used to estimate age by analyzing various features of a person, such as images of their face, teeth, or bones (78). The Artificial Intelligence system can be trained to recognize patterns and features associated with different ages and then use this knowledge to estimate the age of an unknown person. In dental age estimation, Artificial Intelligence can be used to analyze dental images, such as x-rays, to estimate a person's age based on the development and wear of their teeth. (63, 7985) In skeletal age estimation, Artificial Intelligence can be used to analyze skeletal images such as X-rays or CT to estimate a person's age based on the development and degeneration of their bones. (8688) Seo et al. used a deep-focus approach for bone age estimation from lateral cephalograms. They included 900 participants aged 4 - 18 years, and the regression model for estimating bone age from segmented cervical vertebrae images yielded average mean absolute error and root mean squared error values of 0.300 and 0.390 years. (89) Artificial Intelligence can be used to estimate facial age: Artificial Intelligence can be used to analyze images of a person's face, such as photographs, to estimate their age based on the appearance of wrinkles, skin texture, and other features. (90) In addition, Artificial Intelligence can build predictive models to estimate a person's age based on various data, such as images, measurements, and demographic information.

Today, several Artificial Intelligence-based algorithms have been developed to determine a person's age or skeletal remains. These algorithms typically use different types of radiographs for these purposes. (79, 91, 92) Kluck et al. used Artificial Intelligence for hand and wrist skeletal age estimation. They concluded that the results of skeletal age estimation by artificial intelligence were generally more outstanding than the results of skeletal age estimation performed by humans using the Greulich and Pyle method. (93) Many conventional methods for determining tooth age have also been tested in the environment provided by Artificial Intelligence. (79, 94) Shen et al. tested Cameriere's method for determining tooth age on a sample of 748 children. They concluded that the accuracy of tooth age determination was higher with machine learning methods based on Cameriere's maturation stages than with Cameriere's formula. The study results suggest that machine learning algorithms may be better than the traditional Cameriere formula. (95) Third molars are very often used for age estimation. Upalananda and Wantanajittikul developed a semi-automated technique to assess the developmental stage of mandibular third molars. The overall accuracy of this method was 82.5%, whereas the accuracy in each developmental stage ranged from 87.5% to 97.5%. (96)

It is important to note that age estimation is complex, and no single method can provide an exact age. Therefore, various methods, including Artificial Intelligence, should be used to obtain the most accurate age estimate. In addition, age estimation may be more difficult in children younger than three years of age than in adults because dental and skeletal development is different in children. Artificial Intelligence can be used to automate specific tasks such as analyzing imaging and patient data, reducing the need for manual labour and increasing the speed and reliability of the process.

APPLICATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN SEX DETERMINATION

Sex determination is an essential aspect of forensic medicine and is performed in a variety of situations, such as criminal investigations, when determining the sex of a victim or suspect can help with identification; in the identification of victims of mass disasters; in missing person cases, when determining the sex of the remains can help with identification and provide closure for families; in genealogical research, sex determination can help confirm family relationships and establish family trees; in specific medical investigations, such as autopsies, sex determination is performed to determine the cause of death and to gather additional information about the person's anatomy and physiology. Sex determination in forensic medicine must be performed with extreme care and accuracy to ensure that the results are reliable and not influenced by bias or error. Several parameters can be used to determine the sex of a person in forensic science, depending on the state of preservation of the material being examined. If the state of preservation is good, examination of the external genitalia, such as the presence or absence of a penis and testes, can be used to determine sex. In addition, other parameters may be used. Skeletal structure: The size and shape of bones, such as the pelvis, can explain a person's sex. Cranial measurements: Cranial measurements, such as the size of the forehead, jaw, and brow ridge, can also help determine sex. Dental characteristics: Differences in tooth size, shape, and eruption between males and females can be used. DNA analysis is a very accurate method of determining the sex of an individual. It involves analyzing the presence of the Y chromosome, which is present in males. Hormones such as testosterone and estrogen are present in different amounts in males and females and can be used to determine sex. The accuracy of sex determination can vary depending on the methods used and the individual's developmental stage. A combination of several methods is often used to increase the accuracy of the results. Sex determination in forensic dentistry in children without distinct sexual characteristics is complicated and challenging, almost impossible.

Artificial Intelligence can be used for sex determination by analyzing various features of a person, such as images of the face, teeth, or bones. (39, 69, 85) Research performed by Oura et al. about deep learning in sex estimation from knee radiographs reached the highest overall testing accuracy of 90.3% in sex estimation. (97) The Artificial Intelligence system can be trained to recognize patterns and features associated with different sex and then use this knowledge to determine the sex of an unknown person. Artificial Intelligence and artificial neural networks (98) can be used to analyze dental images, such as x-rays, to determine a person's sex based on the size, shape, and development of their teeth and jaws. (99, 100) Artificial Intelligence can be used to analyze skeletal images such as X-rays or CT to determine a person's sex based on their bones' size, shape, and development. (101) In addition, Artificial Intelligence can be used to analyze images of a person's face, such as photographs, to determine sex based on wrinkles, skin texture, and other features. Bianchi et al. developed a semi-automatic method for estimating sex based on the shape of the crown of upper posterior teeth. (102)

Sometimes, Artificial Intelligence can be used to create predictive models that estimate a person's sex based on various data, such as images, measurements, and demographic information. In some instances, Artificial Intelligence can automate some tasks, such as analyzing imaging and patient data, reducing the need for manual labour and increasing the speed and accuracy of the sex determination process.

Sex determination is a complex process, primarily using only dental material. To increase reliability and accuracy, other methods such as skeletal sexing, facial sexing, and predictive models should also be used. Artificial Intelligence-based sex determination is a technology still under development, and its accuracy may vary depending on the specific use case and the quality of the data used to train the system.

APPLICATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN DENTAL IDENTIFICATION

Tooth identification is important in dental identification because teeth are unique to each individual and provide a reliable way to identify a person. (103). Teeth are not only unique in size and shape, but also have specific patterns of grooves and ridges that can be used for identification. (104) In forensic science, dental identification can be used to identify human remains in cases where other forms of identification are not possible, such as in mass disasters or when a body is decomposed or mutilated. (105) Dental identification involves comparing dental records, including radiographs, dental charts, and dental models, with the body's teeth to determine a match. Dental identification is considered one of the most reliable forms of identification because teeth are often well preserved even in the presence of fire, trauma, or other destructive forces. In addition, dental records are often available and can provide quick and accurate identification. Therefore, tooth identification is an essential part of dental identification and plays a critical role in forensic science, providing evidence that can help solve crimes and assist families in missing persons cases.

There are several ways in which Artificial Intelligence can be helpful in tooth identification. (64) Identification of individual teeth on x-rays: Artificial Intelligence can independently identify specific tooth types on radiographs with a high degree of precision and reliability. (106110) In addition, recently there has been an increasing amount of research indicating the possibility of Artificial Intelligence recognizing the types of dental implants on radiographs. (111, 112) Image analysis: Artificial Intelligence can help forensic dentists analyze dental images, such as x-rays, to identify and match individuals based on their teeth and jaws. (113) Dental databases: Artificial Intelligence can be used to search and match dental records in databases, which can help identify individuals. Automation: Artificial Intelligence can be used to automate certain tasks, such as dental image analysis, which can significantly reduce the need for manual labor and improve the speed and accuracy of the identification process. (114) Predictive analytics: Artificial Intelligence can help predict the likelihood of certain dental conditions and diseases based on a patient's data, contributing to prevention and treatment. Age estimation: Artificial Intelligence can be used to analyze dental images to help forensic dentists estimate the age of individuals, which can be helpful in cases where the person's identity is unknown. Facial reconstruction: Artificial Intelligence can be used to create 3D models of teeth and jaws, which can help in facial reconstruction of unidentified remains.

APPLICATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE DETECTION OF BITE PERPETRATORS

Bite mark analysis is a forensic science concerned with examining and comparing human bite marks on the skin, food, or other objects. (115) The goal of bite mark analysis is to determine if a particular person caused the bite mark and to provide evidence that can be used in court. (116) The bite mark analysis typically involves taking and preserving the bite mark, examining and documenting the bite mark, comparing the bite mark to known dental impressions or records, and interpreting and analyzing the results. (117)

Artificial Intelligence can be helpful in bite mark analysis in several ways. (118, 119) Image enhancement: Artificial Intelligence can enhance images of bite marks, making it easier for forensic dentists to analyze them and identify patterns and features. Matching: Artificial Intelligence can be used to analyze and match bite marks, which can be used as evidence in criminal cases. A person can be classified as a suspect or ruled out by comparing bite marks found on a victim or object with a suspect's dental records. Automation Artificial Intelligence can automate specific tasks like analyzing dental images. This can have a positive impact on the speed and accuracy of the identification process and reduce the possibility of human error and the need for manual labour. Predictive analytics: Artificial Intelligence can help predict the likelihood of certain dental conditions and diseases based on patient data, contributing to their prevention and treatment. Dental databases: Artificial Intelligence can be used to search and match dental records in databases, which can help identify individuals. Age estimation: Artificial Intelligence can be used to analyze dental images to help forensic dentists estimate the age of individuals in the context of bite marks, which can be helpful in cases where the individual's identity is unknown.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of Artificial Intelligence in forensic medicine and forensic dentistry is still in its early stages. However, the possibilities are tremendous, and the future will show what is applicable in daily practice.

  • · The use of Artificial Intelligence in forensic dentistry has several advantages: Improved accuracy and efficiency: Artificial Intelligence can help forensic dentists analyze large amounts of dental data, such as imaging and patient records, to identify and match individuals more quickly and accurately.

  • · Automation of tasks: Artificial Intelligence can be used to automate certain tasks, such as dental image analysis, which can reduce the need for manual labour and increase the speed and accuracy of identification.

  • · Improving the quality of evidence: Artificial Intelligence can be used to enhance images and better represent teeth and jaws, which can help improve the quality of evidence in forensic cases.

In addition, as mentioned earlier, Artificial Intelligence can be used to analyze dental images to assist forensic dentists in estimating the age of individuals; Artificial Intelligence can be used to create 3D models of teeth and jaws that can be used to assist in the facial reconstruction of unidentified remains; Artificial Intelligence can be used to analyze and match bite marks, which can be used as evidence in criminal cases; Artificial Intelligence can be used to assist in searching and matching dental records in databases, which can help identify individuals.

In addition to the advantages, the application of Artificial Intelligence also has some disadvantages, which may be related to discrimination, transparency, accountability, privacy, security, ethics and others. Bias and discrimination: Artificial Intelligence systems can perpetuate and even amplify bias and discrimination in the data on which they have been trained. This can lead to misidentification or misestimation of the age and sex of individuals and even misidentification of bite marks. Lack of transparency and accountability: It can be challenging to understand how Artificial Intelligence systems make decisions, making it difficult to explain or hold them accountable. All of this makes them difficult to use as evidence in court. Privacy and security concerns: Artificial Intelligence systems require large amounts of patient data to function, which can lead to privacy and security concerns, especially given the proliferation of electronic dental records. Dependence on technology: Artificial Intelligence may become a crutch that forensic dentists rely on too heavily, to the point that some may only be able to perform tasks with the assistance of Artificial Intelligence. Currently, this problem is in its infancy, with few examples of Artificial Intelligence being used daily in the work of forensic dentists. Limited understanding: Artificial Intelligence systems may be limited in their understanding of context and may need help understanding nuances and subtleties of human oral health and disease, especially in the legal context required by forensic dentistry. Job displacement: Artificial Intelligence can automate specific tasks, such as analysing dental imaging and patient data, leading to job displacement and unemployment. In some fields, job displacement has become a severe problem, but this is different from the work of forensic dentists. Ethical concerns: Artificial Intelligence can raise ethical concerns such as autonomy and decision-making in healthcare. Ethical issues will become more critical as the application of Artificial Intelligence becomes more prevalent in forensic medicine and forensic dentistry. Ethical issues are primarily related to the origin of the samples on which Artificial Intelligence is trained.

It is essential to consider these potential advantages and disadvantages when developing and implementing Artificial Intelligence systems in forensic medicine and forensic dentistry and to have regulations and controls in place to mitigate potential negative impacts. It is also essential to ensure that Artificial Intelligence systems are used as a support tool rather than a replacement for forensic experts.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was funded by the Croatian Science Foundation under the project: Tooth Analysis in Forensic and Archeological Research IP-2020-02-9423.

Footnotes

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Schroeder S. ChatGPT is the fastest growing app of all time [Internet]. Mashable. 2023 [cited 2023 Feb 14]. Available from: https://mashable.com/article/chatgpt-fastest-growing
  • 2.Stokel-Walker C. ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove. Nature. 2023. January 18;613(7945):620–1. 10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Else H. Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Nature. 2023. January 12;613(7944):423–423. 10.1038/d41586-023-00056-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vodanović M, Subašić M, Milošević D, Savić Pavičin I. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Dentistry. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2023. March 27;57(1):70–84. 10.15644/asc57/1/8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rainie L, Funk C, Nolan H. How Americans think about artificial intelligence [Internet]. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. 2022 [cited 2023 Feb 14]. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2022/03/17/how-americans-think-about-artificial-intelligence/
  • 6.Haenlein M, Kaplan A. A Brief History of Artificial Intelligence: On the Past, Present, and Future of Artificial Intelligence. Calif Manage Rev. 2019. July 17;61:000812561986492. 10.1177/0008125619864925 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kumar N, Kharkwal N, Kohli R, Choudhary S. Ethical aspects and future of artificial intelligence. In: 2016 International Conference on Innovation and Challenges in Cyber Security (ICICCS-INBUSH). 2016. p. 111–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zinchenko V, Chetverikov S, Akhmad E, Arzamasov K, Vladzymyrskyy A, Andreychenko A, et al. Changes in software as a medical device based on artificial intelligence technologies. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022;17(10):1969–77. 10.1007/s11548-022-02669-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhou LQ, Wang JY, Yu SY, Wu GG, Wei Q, Deng YB, et al. Artificial intelligence in medical imaging of the liver. World J Gastroenterol. 2019. February 14;25(6):672–82. 10.3748/wjg.v25.i6.672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Seah J, Brady Z, Ewert K, Law M. Artificial intelligence in medical imaging: implications for patient radiation safety. Br J Radiol. 2021. October 1;94(1126):20210406. 10.1259/bjr.20210406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kröner PT, Engels MM, Glicksberg BS, Johnson KW, Mzaik O, van Hooft JE, et al. Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: A state-of-the-art review. World J Gastroenterol. 2021. October 28;27(40):6794–824. 10.3748/wjg.v27.i40.6794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mitsala A, Tsalikidis C, Pitiakoudis M, Simopoulos C, Tsaroucha AK. Artificial Intelligence in Colorectal Cancer Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment. A New Era. Curr Oncol. 2021. April 23;28(3):1581–607. 10.3390/curroncol28030149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yasmin F, Shah SMI, Naeem A, Shujauddin SM, Jabeen A, Kazmi S, et al. Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and detection of heart failure: the past, present, and future. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2021. December 22;22(4):1095–113. 10.31083/j.rcm2204121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Du-Harpur X, Watt FM, Luscombe NM, Lynch MD. What is AI? Applications of artificial intelligence to dermatology. Br J Dermatol. 2020. September;183(3):423–30. 10.1111/bjd.18880 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.El-Kareh R, Sittig DF. Enhancing diagnosis through technology: Decision support, artificial intelligence, and beyond. Crit Care Clin. 2022. January;38(1):129–39. 10.1016/j.ccc.2021.08.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gupta R, Srivastava D, Sahu M, Tiwari S, Ambasta RK, Kumar P. Artificial intelligence to deep learning: machine intelligence approach for drug discovery. Mol Divers. 2021;25(3):1315–60. 10.1007/s11030-021-10217-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Garcia-Vidal C, Sanjuan G, Puerta-Alcalde P, Moreno-García E, Soriano A. Artificial intelligence to support clinical decision-making processes. EBioMedicine. 2019. July 11;46:27–9. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.07.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ho D, Quake SR, McCabe ERB, Chng WJ, Chow EK, Ding X, et al. Enabling technologies for personalized and precision medicine. Trends Biotechnol. 2020. May;38(5):497–518. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Xie Y, Lu L, Gao F, He Sjiang, Zhao H juan, Fang Y, et al. Integration of Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, and Wearable Technology for Chronic Disease Management: A New Paradigm in Smart Healthcare. Curr Med Sci. 2021;41(6):1123–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Letourneau-Guillon L, Camirand D, Guilbert F, Forghani R. Artificial Intelligence Applications for Workflow, Process Optimization and Predictive Analytics. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2020. November 1;30(4):e1–15. 10.1016/j.nic.2020.08.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ramkumar PN, Kunze KN, Haeberle HS, Karnuta JM, Luu BC, Nwachukwu BU, et al. Clinical and Research Medical Applications of Artificial Intelligence. Arthroscopy [Internet]. 2020 Aug 21 [cited 2023 Jan 30]; Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7441013/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 22.Fatima A, Shafi I, Afzal H, Díez IDLT, Lourdes DRSM, Breñosa J, et al. Advancements in Dentistry with Artificial Intelligence: Current Clinical Applications and Future Perspectives. Healthcare (Basel). 2022. October 31;10(11):2188. 10.3390/healthcare10112188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Heo MS, Kim JE, Hwang JJ, Han SS, Kim JS, Yi WJ, et al. Artificial intelligence in oral and maxillofacial radiology: what is currently possible? Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021. March 1;50(3):20200375. 10.1259/dmfr.20200375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Putra RH, Doi C, Yoda N, Astuti ER, Sasaki K. Current applications and development of artificial intelligence for digital dental radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2022. January 1;51(1):20210197. 10.1259/dmfr.20210197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lian L, Zhu T, Zhu F, Zhu H. Deep Learning for Caries Detection and Classification. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021. September 13;11(9):1672. 10.3390/diagnostics11091672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Khanagar SB, Al-Ehaideb A, Vishwanathaiah S, Maganur PC, Patil S, Naik S, et al. Scope and performance of artificial intelligence technology in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning, and clinical decision-making - A systematic review. J Dent Sci. 2021. January;16(1):482–92. 10.1016/j.jds.2020.05.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bichu YM, Hansa I, Bichu AY, Premjani P, Flores-Mir C, Vaid NR. Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in orthodontics: a scoping review. Prog Orthod. 2021. July 5;22:18. 10.1186/s40510-021-00361-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bernauer SA, Zitzmann NU, Joda T. The Use and Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Prosthodontics: A Systematic Review. Sensors (Basel). 2021. October 5;21(19):6628. 10.3390/s21196628 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Papantonopoulos G, Takahashi K, Bountis T, Loos BG. Artificial Neural Networks for the Diagnosis of Aggressive Periodontitis Trained by Immunologic Parameters. PLoS One. 2014. March 6;9(3):e89757. 10.1371/journal.pone.0089757 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Asiri AF, Altuwalah AS. The role of neural artificial intelligence for diagnosis and treatment planning in endodontics: A qualitative review. Saudi Dent J. 2022. May;34(4):270–81. 10.1016/j.sdentj.2022.04.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ilhan B, Lin K, Guneri P, Wilder-Smith P. Improving Oral Cancer Outcomes with Imaging and Artificial Intelligence. J Dent Res. 2020. March;99(3):241–8. 10.1177/0022034520902128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lee JH, Jeong SN. Efficacy of deep convolutional neural network algorithm for the identification and classification of dental implant systems, using panoramic and periapical radiographs: A pilot study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. June 26;99(26):e20787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ahmad P, Alam MK, Aldajani A, Alahmari A, Alanazi A, Stoddart M, et al. Dental Robotics: A Disruptive Technology. Sensors (Basel). 2021. May 11;21(10):3308. 10.3390/s21103308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Junaid N, Khan N, Ahmed N, Abbasi MS, Das G, Maqsood A, et al. Development, Application, and Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Cephalometric Landmark Identification and Diagnosis: A Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel). 2022. December 5;10(12):2454. 10.3390/healthcare10122454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Calazans MAA, Ferreira FABS, Alcoforado M de LMG, Santos AD, Pontual ADA, Madeiro F. Automatic Classification System for Periapical Lesions in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography. Sensors (Basel). 2022. August 28;22(17):6481. 10.3390/s22176481 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Agrawal P, Nikhade P. Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: Past, Present, and Future. Cureus. •••;14(7):e27405. 10.7759/cureus.27405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Stavrianos C, Dietrich EM, Stavrianos I, Petalotis N. The Role of Dentistry in the Management of Mass Disasters and Bioterrorism. Acta Stomatol Croat Int J Oral Sci Dent Med. 2010. June 18;44(2):110–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rangaiah M. 7 Applications of AI in Law Industry | Analytics Steps [Internet]. [cited 2023 Feb 14]. Available from: https://www.analyticssteps.com/blogs/artificial-intelligence-law-industry
  • 39.Oliva A, Grassi S, Vetrugno G, Rossi R, Della Morte G, Pinchi V, et al. Management of Medico-Legal Risks in Digital Health Era: A Scoping Review. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;8:821756. 10.3389/fmed.2021.821756 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wankhade TD, Ingale SW, Mohite PM, Bankar NJ. Artificial Intelligence in Forensic Medicine and Toxicology: The Future of Forensic Medicine. Cureus. 2022. August;14(8):e28376. 10.7759/cureus.28376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ogawara T, Usui A, Homma N, Funayama M. Diagnosing Drowning in Postmortem CT Images Using Artificial Intelligence. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2022. December 14;259(1):65–75. 10.1620/tjem.2022.J097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mapundu MT, Kabudula CW, Musenge E, Olago V, Celik T. Performance evaluation of machine learning and Computer Coded Verbal Autopsy (CCVA) algorithms for cause of death determination: A comparative analysis of data from rural South Africa. Front Public Health. 2022;10:990838. 10.3389/fpubh.2022.990838 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lyu J, Shi H, Zhang J, Norvilitis J. Prediction model for suicide based on back propagation neural network and multilayer perceptron. Front Neuroinform. 2022;16:961588. 10.3389/fninf.2022.961588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fleischer H, Lutter C, Büttner A, Mittelmeier W, Thurow K. Semi-Automated Determination of Heavy Metals in Autopsy Tissue Using Robot-Assisted Sample Preparation and ICP-MS. Molecules. 2021. June 23;26(13):3820. 10.3390/molecules26133820 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zolotenkova GV, Rogachev AI, Pigolkin YI, Edelev IS, Borshchevskaya VN, Cameriere R. Age Classification in Forensic Medicine Using Machine Learning Techniques. Sovrem Tekhnologii Med. 2022;14(1):15–22. 10.17691/stm2022.14.1.02 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ortiz AG, Soares GH, da Rosa GC, Biazevic MGH, Michel-Crosato E. A pilot study of an automated personal identification process: Applying machine learning to panoramic radiographs. Imaging Sci Dent. 2021. June;51(2):187–93. 10.5624/isd.20200324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Thurzo A, Kosnáčová HS, Kurilová V, Kosmeľ S, Beňuš R, Moravanský N, et al. Use of Advanced Artificial Intelligence in Forensic Medicine, Forensic Anthropology and Clinical Anatomy. Healthcare (Basel). 2021. November 12;9(11):1545. 10.3390/healthcare9111545 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Howard JJ, Rabbitt LR, Sirotin YB. Human-algorithm teaming in face recognition: How algorithm outcomes cognitively bias human decision-making. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0237855. 10.1371/journal.pone.0237855 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Macarulla Rodriguez A, Geradts Z, Worring M. Likelihood Ratios for Deep Neural Networks in Face Comparison. J Forensic Sci. 2020. July;65(4):1169–83. 10.1111/1556-4029.14324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Fydanaki A, Geradts Z. Evaluating OpenFace: an open-source automatic facial comparison algorithm for forensics. Forensic Sci Res. 2018;3(3):202–9. 10.1080/20961790.2018.1523703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wang H, Song W, Liu W, Song N, Wang Y, Pan H. A Bayesian Scene-Prior-Based Deep Network Model for Face Verification. Sensors (Basel). 2018. June 11;18(6):1906. 10.3390/s18061906 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hansen SL, Nielsen MKK, Linnet K, Rasmussen BS. Simple implementation of muscle tissue into routine workflow of blood analysis in forensic cases - A validated method for quantification of 29 drugs in postmortem blood and muscle samples by UHPLC-MS/MS. Forensic Sci Int. 2021. August;325:110901. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Veldhuis MS, Ariëns S, Ypma RJF, Abeel T, Benschop CCG. Explainable artificial intelligence in forensics: Realistic explanations for number of contributor predictions of DNA profiles. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2022. January;56:102632. 10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102632 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Huang L, Xu C, Yang W, Yu R. A machine learning framework to determine geolocations from metagenomic profiling. Biol Direct. 2020. November 23;15(1):27. 10.1186/s13062-020-00278-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Leone M. From Fingers to Faces: Visual Semiotics and Digital Forensics. Int J Semiot Law. 2021;34(2):579–99. 10.1007/s11196-020-09766-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Singh RB, Zhuang H. Measurements, Analysis, Classification, and Detection of Gunshot and Gunshot-like Sounds. Sensors (Basel). 2022. November 25;22(23):9170. 10.3390/s22239170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Nijhawan R, Ansari SA, Kumar S, Alassery F, El-Kenawy SM. Gun identification from gunshot audios for secure public places using transformer learning. Sci Rep. 2022. August 2;12(1):13300. 10.1038/s41598-022-17497-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ghioni R, Taddeo M, Floridi L. Open source intelligence and AI: a systematic review of the GELSI literature. AI Soc. 2023. January 28;•••:1–16. 10.1007/s00146-023-01628-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kraetzer C, Siegel D, Seidlitz S, Dittmann J. Process-Driven Modelling of Media Forensic Investigations-Considerations on the Example of DeepFake Detection. Sensors (Basel). 2022. April 20;22(9):3137. 10.3390/s22093137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Pathirannahalage I, Vidanapathirana M, Subasinghe A. Artificial Intelligence for Forensic Medicine. Medico-Leg J Sri Lanka. 2022. December 31;10:17. 10.4038/mljsl.v10i2.7469 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ahmed Alaa El-Din E. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN FORENSIC SCIENCE : INVASION OR REVOLUTION? Egypt Soc Clin Toxicol J. 2022. December 1;10(2):20–32. 10.21608/esctj.2022.158178.1012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Alladio E, Poggiali B, Cosenza G, Pilli E. Multivariate statistical approach and machine learning for the evaluation of biogeographical ancestry inference in the forensic field. Sci Rep. 2022. May 28;12(1):8974. 10.1038/s41598-022-12903-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Mohammad N, Ahmad R, Kurniawan A, Mohd Yusof MYP. Applications of contemporary artificial intelligence technology in forensic odontology as primary forensic identifier: A scoping review. Front Artif Intell. 2022. December 6;5:1049584. 10.3389/frai.2022.1049584 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Heinrich A, Güttler F, Wendt S, Schenkl S, Hubig M, Wagner R, et al. Forensic Odontology: Automatic Identification of Persons Comparing Antemortem and Postmortem Panoramic Radiographs Using Computer Vision. Röfo Fortschr Geb Röntgenstr Nuklearmed. 2018. December;190(12):1152–8. 10.1055/a-0632-4744 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Eto N, Yamazoe J, Tsuji A, Wada N, Ikeda N. Development of an artificial intelligence-based algorithm to classify images acquired with an intraoral scanner of individual molar teeth into three categories. PLoS One. 2022;17(1):e0261870. 10.1371/journal.pone.0261870 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Matsuda S, Miyamoto T, Yoshimura H, Hasegawa T. Personal identification with orthopantomography using simple convolutional neural networks: a preliminary study. Sci Rep. 2020. August 11;10(1):13559. 10.1038/s41598-020-70474-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Khanagar SB, Vishwanathaiah S, Naik S, Al-Kheraif A, Devang Divakar D, Sarode SC, et al. Application and performance of artificial intelligence technology in forensic odontology - A systematic review. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2021. February;48:101826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Thurzo A, Jančovičová V, Hain M, Thurzo M, Novák B, Kosnáčová H, et al. Human Remains Identification Using Micro-CT, Chemometric and AI Methods in Forensic Experimental Reconstruction of Dental Patterns after Concentrated Sulphuric Acid Significant Impact. Molecules. 2022. June 23;27(13):4035. 10.3390/molecules27134035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Albernaz Neves J, Antunes-Ferreira N, Machado V, Botelho J, Proença L, Quintas A, et al. An Umbrella Review of the Evidence of Sex Determination Procedures in Forensic Dentistry. J Pers Med. 2022. May 13;12(5):787. 10.3390/jpm12050787 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Pham CV, Lee SJ, Kim SY, Lee S, Kim SH, Kim HS. Age estimation based on 3D post-mortem computed tomography images of mandible and femur using convolutional neural networks. PLoS One. 2021;16(5):e0251388. 10.1371/journal.pone.0251388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Saleh O, Nozaki K, Matsumura M, Yanaka W, Miura H, Fueki K. Texture-Based Neural Network Model for Biometric Dental Applications. J Pers Med. 2022. November 25;12(12):1954. 10.3390/jpm12121954 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Adserias-Garriga J, Zapico SC. Age Assessment in Forensic Cases: Anthropological, Odontological and Biochemical Methods for Age Estimation in the Dead. Mathews J Forensic Res. 2018. January 8;1(1):1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Alkass K, Buchholz BA, Ohtani S, Yamamoto T, Druid H, Spalding KL. Age estimation in forensic sciences: application of combined aspartic acid racemization and radiocarbon analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2010. May;9(5):1022–30. 10.1074/mcp.M900525-MCP200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Marconi V, Iommi M, Monachesi C, Faragalli A, Skrami E, Gesuita R, et al. Validity of age estimation methods and reproducibility of bone/dental maturity indices for chronological age estimation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of validation studies. Sci Rep. 2022. September 16;12(1):15607. 10.1038/s41598-022-19944-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Priya E. Methods of Skeletal Age Estimation used by Forensic Anthropologists in Adults: A Review. Foresic Res Criminol. Int J. 2017. February 20;4. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Brkić H, Miličević M, Petrovečki M. Forensic Determination of Dental Age of Adults. Acta Stomatol Croat Int J Oral Sci Dent Med. 2008. September 15;42(3):267–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Brkić H, Škavić J, Strinović D. Post Mortem Identification of a Body by Use of Dental Evidence. Acta Stomatol Croat Int J Oral Sci Dent Med. 1994. September 15;28(3):231–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Li Y, Huang Z, Dong X, Liang W, Xue H, Zhang L, et al. Forensic age estimation for pelvic X-ray images using deep learning. Eur Radiol. 2019. May;29(5):2322–9. 10.1007/s00330-018-5791-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Shen S, Yuan X, Wang J, Fan L, Zhao J, Tao J. Evaluation of a machine learning algorithms for predicting the dental age of adolescent based on different preprocessing methods. Front Public Health. 2022;10:1068253. 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1068253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Zaborowicz K, Biedziak B, Olszewska A, Zaborowicz M. Tooth and Bone Parameters in the Assessment of the Chronological Age of Children and Adolescents Using Neural Modelling Methods. Sensors (Basel). 2021. September 8;21(18):6008. 10.3390/s21186008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Cieślińska K, Zaborowicz K, Zaborowicz M, Biedziak B. Evaluation of the Second Premolar’s Bud Position Using Computer Image Analysis and Neural Modelling Methods. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. November 18;19(22):15240. 10.3390/ijerph192215240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.De Tobel J, Radesh P, Vandermeulen D, Thevissen PW. An automated technique to stage lower third molar development on panoramic radiographs for age estimation: a pilot study. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2017. December 1;35(2):42–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Banjšak L, Milošević D, Subašić M. Implementation of artificial intelligence in chronological age estimation from orthopantomographic X-ray images of archaeological skull remains. Bull Int Assoc Paleodont. 2020. December 22;14(2):122–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Milošević D, Vodanović M, Galić I, Subašić M. Automated estimation of chronological age from panoramic dental X-ray images using deep learning. Expert Syst Appl. 2022. March 1;189:116038. 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116038 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Milošević D, Vodanović M, Galić I. SubašIć M. A Comprehensive Exploration of Neural Networks for Forensic Analysis of Adult Single Tooth X-Ray Images. IEEE Access. 2022;10:70980–1002. 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3187959 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Zaborowicz M, Zaborowicz K, Biedziak B, Garbowski T. Deep Learning Neural Modelling as a Precise Method in the Assessment of the Chronological Age of Children and Adolescents Using Tooth and Bone Parameters. Sensors (Basel). 2022. January 14;22(2):637. 10.3390/s22020637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Mutasa S, Chang PD, Ruzal-Shapiro C, Ayyala R. MABAL: a Novel Deep-Learning Architecture for Machine-Assisted Bone Age Labeling. J Digit Imaging. 2018. August;31(4):513–9. 10.1007/s10278-018-0053-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Amasya H, Yildirim D, Aydogan T, Kemaloglu N, Orhan K. Cervical vertebral maturation assessment on lateral cephalometric radiographs using artificial intelligence: comparison of machine learning classifier models. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020. July;49(5):20190441. 10.1259/dmfr.20190441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Seo H, Hwang J, Jung YH, Lee E, Nam OH, Shin J. Deep focus approach for accurate bone age estimation from lateral cephalogram. J Dent Sci. 2023. January;18(1):34–43. 10.1016/j.jds.2022.07.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Hu Z, Wen Y, Wang J, Wang M, Hong R, Yan S. Facial Age Estimation With Age Difference. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2017. July;26(7):3087–97. 10.1109/TIP.2016.2633868 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Kim S, Lee YH, Noh YK, Park FC, Auh QS. Age-group determination of living individuals using first molar images based on artificial intelligence. Sci Rep. 2021. January 13;11(1):1073. 10.1038/s41598-020-80182-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Wang X, Liu Y, Miao X, Chen Y, Cao X, Zhang Y, et al. DENSEN: a convolutional neural network for estimating chronological ages from panoramic radiographs. BMC Bioinformatics. 2022. October 14;23 Suppl 3:426. 10.1186/s12859-022-04935-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Kluck DG, Makarov MR, Kanaan Y, Jo CH, Birch JG. Comparison of “Human” and Artificial Intelligence Hand-and-Wrist Skeletal Age Estimation in an Epiphysiodesis Cohort. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023. February 1;105(3):202. 10.2106/JBJS.22.00833 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Banar N, Bertels J, Laurent F, Boedi RM, De Tobel J, Thevissen P, et al. Towards fully automated third molar development staging in panoramic radiographs. Int J Legal Med. 2020. September;134(5):1831–41. 10.1007/s00414-020-02283-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Shen S, Liu Z, Wang J, Fan L, Ji F, Tao J. Machine learning assisted Cameriere method for dental age estimation. BMC Oral Health. 2021. December 15;21(1):641. 10.1186/s12903-021-01996-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Upalananda W, Wantanajittikul K, Na Lampang S, Janhom A. Semi-automated technique to assess the developmental stage of mandibular third molars for age estimation. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2023. January 2;55(1):23–33. 10.1080/00450618.2021.1882570 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Oura P, Junno JA, Hunt D, Lehenkari P, Tuukkanen J, Maijanen H. Deep learning in sex estimation from knee radiographs – A proof-of-concept study utilizing the Terry Anatomical Collection. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2023. March 1;61:102211. 10.1016/j.legalmed.2023.102211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Oliva G, Pinchi V, Bianchi I, Focardi M, Paganelli C, Zotti R, et al. Three-Dimensional Dental Analysis for Sex Estimation in the Italian Population: A Pilot Study Based on a Geometric Morphometric and Artificial Neural Network Approach. Healthcare (Basel). 2021. December 22;10(1):9. 10.3390/healthcare10010009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Milošević D, Vodanović M, Galić I, Subašić M. Automated Sex Assessment of Individual Adult Tooth X-Ray Images. In: 2021 12th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis (ISPA). 2021. p. 72–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Franco A, Porto L, Heng D, Murray J, Lygate A, Franco R, et al. Diagnostic performance of convolutional neural networks for dental sexual dimorphism. Sci Rep. 2022. October 14;12(1):17279. 10.1038/s41598-022-21294-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Vila-Blanco N, Varas-Quintana P, Aneiros-Ardao Á, Tomás I, Carreira MJ. Automated description of the mandible shape by deep learning. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021. December;16(12):2215–24. 10.1007/s11548-021-02474-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Bianchi I, Oliva G, Vitale G, Bellugi B, Bertana G, Focardi M, et al. A Semi-Automatic Method on a Small Italian Sample for Estimating Sex Based on the Shape of the Crown of the Maxillary Posterior Teeth. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. January;11(6):845. 10.3390/healthcare11060845 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Saxena S, Sharma P, Gupta N. Experimental studies of forensic odontology to aid in the identification process. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2010. July;2(2):69–76. 10.4103/0975-1475.81285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Kaul B, Vaid V, Gupta S, Kaul S. Forensic Odontological Parameters as Biometric Tool: A Review. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(3):416–9. 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1967 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Jayakrishnan JM, Reddy J, Vinod Kumar RB. Role of forensic odontology and anthropology in the identification of human remains. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2021;25(3):543–7. 10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_81_21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Tuzoff DV, Tuzova LN, Bornstein MM, Krasnov AS, Kharchenko MA, Nikolenko SI, et al. Tooth detection and numbering in panoramic radiographs using convolutional neural networks. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019. May;48(4):20180051. 10.1259/dmfr.20180051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Bilgir E, Bayrakdar İŞ, Çelik Ö, Orhan K, Akkoca F, Sağlam H, et al. An artifıcial ıntelligence approach to automatic tooth detection and numbering in panoramic radiographs. BMC Med Imaging. 2021. August 13;21(1):124. 10.1186/s12880-021-00656-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Görürgöz C, Orhan K, Bayrakdar IS, Çelik Ö, Bilgir E, Odabaş A, et al. Performance of a convolutional neural network algorithm for tooth detection and numbering on periapical radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2022. March 1;51(3):20210246. 10.1259/dmfr.20210246 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Kılıc MC, Bayrakdar IS, Çelik Ö, Bilgir E, Orhan K, Aydın OB, et al. Artificial intelligence system for automatic deciduous tooth detection and numbering in panoramic radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021. September 1;50(6):20200172. 10.1259/dmfr.20200172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Estai M, Tennant M, Gebauer D, Brostek A, Vignarajan J, Mehdizadeh M, et al. Deep learning for automated detection and numbering of permanent teeth on panoramic images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2022. February 1;51(2):20210296. 10.1259/dmfr.20210296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Vyas S, Barmak BA, Galluci GO, Att W, et al. Artificial intelligence applications in implant dentistry: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Jun 15;S0022-3913(21)00272-9. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 112.Kohlakala A, Coetzer J, Bertels J, Vandermeulen D. Deep learning-based dental implant recognition using synthetic X-ray images. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2022. October;60(10):2951–68. 10.1007/s11517-022-02642-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Kaya E, Gunec HG, Gokyay SS, Kutal S, Gulum S, Ates HF. Proposing a CNN Method for Primary and Permanent Tooth Detection and Enumeration on Pediatric Dental Radiographs. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022. July 1;46(4):293–8. 10.22514/1053-4625-46.4.6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Choi HR, Siadari TS, Kim JE, Huh KH, Yi WJ, Lee SS, et al. Automatic detection of teeth and dental treatment patterns on dental panoramic radiographs using deep neural networks. Forensic Sci Res. 2022;7(3):456–66. 10.1080/20961790.2022.2034714 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Daniel MJ, Pazhani A. Accuracy of bite mark analysis from food substances: A comparative study. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2015;7(3):222–6. 10.4103/0975-1475.172442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Verma AK, Kumar S, Bhattacharya S. Identification of a person with the help of bite mark analysis. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2013;3(2):88–91. 10.1016/j.jobcr.2013.05.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.van der Velden A, Spiessens M, Willems G. Bite mark analysis and comparison using image perception technology. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2006. June;24(1):14–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Domínguez-Rodrigo M, Baquedano E. Distinguishing butchery cut marks from crocodile bite marks through machine learning methods. Sci Rep. 2018. April 10;8(1):5786. 10.1038/s41598-018-24071-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Cifuentes-Alcobendas G, Domínguez-Rodrigo M. Deep learning and taphonomy: high accuracy in the classification of cut marks made on fleshed and defleshed bones using convolutional neural networks. Sci Rep. 2019. December 12;9(1):18933. 10.1038/s41598-019-55439-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Forensic Odonto-stomatology are provided here courtesy of International Organization of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology

RESOURCES