Significance
Extremely dense harmful algal blooms (HABs) are an increasing problem globally. How microscopic, single-celled organisms can reach such high abundances is still poorly understood. Over 50 y ago, it was postulated that motile dinoflagellates could form dense blooms through their vertical swimming, which gave them a competitive advantage over other phytoplankton. We tested this hypothesis with innovative in situ observations during a dense bloom. The motile dinoflagellates swam downward at night into the deep nutrient pool, and upward during the day to photosynthesize. Decreases of nutrients in deep waters were proportional to increases in organism abundance, directly linking organism behavioral and metabolic activities. These observations demonstrate that vertical migration is central to the formation of exceptionally dense dinoflagellate HABs.
Keywords: harmful algal blooms, Oceanography, coastal water quality
Abstract
Harmful algal blooms (HABs) are increasing globally, causing economic, human health, and ecosystem harm. In spite of the frequent occurrence of HABs, the mechanisms responsible for their exceptionally high biomass remain imperfectly understood. A 50-y-old hypothesis posits that some dense blooms derive from dinoflagellate motility: organisms swim upward during the day to photosynthesize and downward at night to access deep nutrients. This allows dinoflagellates to outgrow their nonmotile competitors. We tested this hypothesis with in situ data from an autonomous, ocean-wave-powered vertical profiling system. We showed that the dinoflagellate Lingulodinium polyedra’s vertical migration led to depletion of deep nitrate during a 2020 red tide HAB event. Downward migration began at dusk, with the maximum migration depth determined by local nitrate concentrations. Losses of nitrate at depth were balanced by proportional increases in phytoplankton chlorophyll concentrations and suspended particle load, conclusively linking vertical migration to the access and assimilation of deep nitrate in the ocean environment. Vertical migration during the red tide created anomalous biogeochemical conditions compared to 70 y of climatological data, demonstrating the capacity of these events to temporarily reshape the coastal ocean’s ecosystem and biogeochemistry. Advances in the understanding of the physiological, behavioral, and metabolic dynamics of HAB-forming organisms from cutting-edge observational techniques will improve our ability to forecast HABs and mitigate their consequences in the future.
Harmful algal blooms (HABs) are a global problem, impacting human health, ecosystem function, and water quality. HAB outbreaks are estimated to cost at least tens of millions of dollars annually in the United States alone (1, 2). Major strides have been made in elucidating the biochemical pathways for toxin production, developing monitoring, tracking, and response strategies in key locations, and improving modeling capacity (3–5). However, the biotic and abiotic factors that lead to the extreme biomass density of HABs are not yet fully understood, complicating efforts to forecast their occurrence and impact (6–8).
Dinoflagellate blooms often occur during strongly stratified ocean conditions (9). Nutrient concentrations in the upper, relatively warm, sunlit waters become depleted through uptake by the phytoplankton community. These upper waters are separated from the deeper, cold, dark, and nutrient-rich waters by a strong density gradient that inhibits the upward physical transport of nutrients. Many HAB-forming dinoflagellate species—like Lingulodinium polyedra (formerly Lingulodinium polyedrum; Gonyaulax polyedra)—are active swimmers (10–12). Early field and laboratory observations documented diel vertical migrations (DVMs) of dinoflagellates, in which organisms accumulated near the surface during daylight hours and swam to depth at night (13–15). Based on observational evidence provided by Holmes et al. (16), Eppley et al. (17) were the first to hypothesize that this migration behavior might allow dinoflagellates to form extremely dense blooms by gaining access to light at the surface during the day, and nutrients at depth during the night—deriving a competitive advantage over nonmotile photoautotrophic organisms during periods of strong, vertical stratification.
In the 50 y since Eppley et al. (17) was published, laboratory experiments have supported the DVM-bloom hypothesis, demonstrating that dinoflagellates can vertically migrate and that their migrations depend on light, nutrient distributions, stratification, and turbulence (e.g., refs. 17–20). However, despite extensive laboratory research, the DVM-bloom hypothesis has never been conclusively tested in the field.
Field confirmation of the DVM-bloom hypothesis requires evidence that the dinoflagellates vertically migrate, that the dinoflagellates take up nutrients from below the euphotic zone during this migration, and that dinoflagellate abundances increase in proportion to the nutrient uptake. The lack of conclusive field evidence of the DVM-bloom hypothesis is primarily due to two impediments: 1) the need for concurrent in situ measurements of biological, physical, nutrient, and light conditions, and 2) the requirement for those data to be collected with adequate resolution in time and space to separate variability due to physical forcing [e.g., currents, internal waves (IWs)] from variability mediated by biological processes. Here, we use data acquired by a moored autonomous profiler to provide field evidence testing—and supporting—the DVM-bloom hypothesis (17).
Blooms of the dinoflagellate L. polyedra have been fairly common in the Southern California Bight (SCB) for at least 120 y, often growing to cell densities high enough to change the color of the water during the day (hence the term “red tide,” ref. 21) and generate bioluminescence at night (22–26). An unusually intense L. polyedra red tide occurred in the SCB and Northern Baja California waters in the spring of 2020 (Fig. 1A). At its peak, the bloom reached nine million cells per liter at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO) Pier, with chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) concentrations of 897 mg m−3 on April 27 (27, 28). These are the highest values of Chl-a ever measured at Scripps Pier in nearly 40 y of monitoring, and represent roughly 1,000 times the average Chl-a value found in the region (27).
Near-surface images collected by an in situ Imaging FlowCytobot (IFCB, see Methods) at the Del Mar (DM) mooring (Fig. 1B) showed that L. polyedra biomass increased rapidly in early April, while other taxa did not (SI Appendix, Fig. S1). By early May, satellite-detected Chl-a concentrations were >50 mg m−3 (>50 times prebloom values; Fig. 1A). At this time, L. polyedra was the most abundant organism in the IFCB measurements, contributing >80% of the total plankton carbon biomass during daytime (SI Appendix, Fig. S1). At Scripps Pier, L. polyedra cell counts regularly exceeded 1 million cells l−1 in early May, with near-surface Chl-a concentrations over 90 mg m−3 (27). The decay of the bloom in mid-May (SI Appendix, Fig. S1) led to local anoxia and extensive fish and crustacean mortality in the region (29).
Depth-Time-Resolved Measurements during the Red Tide
To investigate the interplay of biogeochemical patterns, organismal behavior, and physical dynamics during the peak of the L. polyedra bloom, we moored a Wirewalker (WW) ocean-wave-powered autonomous profiler adjacent to the DM mooring, ~4 km offshore coastal San Diego (Fig. 1A, Methods, refs. 30 and 31). The WW payload consisted of an integrated suite of sensors to simultaneously measure in situ nitrate, multispectral irradiance, biooptical water properties and hydrographic properties. The WW mooring yielded full-depth (100 m) profiles of light, nitrate concentration, Chl-a fluorescence, optical backscatter, temperature, salinity, and density at 1-m vertical resolution every 15 min for a period of 2 wk (Methods).
These data allowed us to quantify the relationships between dinoflagellate vertical migration, light, and nitrate concentration. Our analyses revealed the cyclic downward vertical migration of dinoflagellates at night, coincident with the loss of nitrate at depth, and proportional increases in the vertically integrated Chl-a and turbidity of the bloom. Toward the end of our data record, the deep nitrate pool was so depleted that the dinoflagellate bloom began to dissipate.
The 2020 bloom event began during unusual conditions in Southern California coastal waters. Anomalously high rainfall in March and April was followed by a prolonged sunny and calm period through mid-May—an uncommon springtime combination (SI Appendix, Fig. S2). The resulting cooccurrence of intense freshwater input and record heating led to record-high sea surface temperatures (>26 °C, https://cdip.ucsd.edu/), and strong subsurface stratification (Fig. 1 C and D)—conditions that are known to favor dinoflagellate bloom initiation (9, 32).
Vertical Migration of Dinoflagellates
In the WW time series, periodically elevated Chl-a concentrations were observed down to ca. 30 to 40-m depth, tens of meters deeper than the measured euphotic zone (Fig. 2 and SI Appendix, Fig. S4), with patches of high Chl-a moving vertically across isopycnal surfaces with a near-daily rhythm (Fig. 1E). A daily rhythm was also apparent in the near-surface (~4 m depth) IFCB L. polyedra cell counts (high during the day, low at night), directly linking the WW Chl-a measurements with L. polyedra abundances (Fig. 2A). Over a week, nitrate became depleted at depths where Chl-a concentrations were periodically high, leading to the nitracline deepening by more than 10 m (Fig. 1F)—an abnormal situation for these coastal waters (see below; ref. 33).
Vertical motions from IWs—waves analogous to surface waves, but propagating along density surfaces in the ocean interior—caused ~20-m vertical fluctuations (peak-to-trough amplitude) of the Chl-a, nitrate, and density distributions (Fig. 1 C–F). Plotting the data in an isopycnal vertical coordinate removes these vertical motions (Fig. 2 and SI Appendix, section 6). For the remainder of this paper, all data are mapped onto isopycnals and plotted against the mean depths of the isopycnals as the vertical coordinate (SI Appendix, section 6). This transformation makes it clear that coherent patches of high Chl-a moved downward from the surface, across isopycnals, to >30-m depth with a ~daily periodicity (Fig. 2B). This descent of Chl-a was most obvious on sunny days (Fig. 2 A and B). Given the dominance of Chl-a by L. polyedra during the bloom (SI Appendix, Fig. S1), and the clear correlations of fluctuations in IFCB-based L. polyedra cell concentration and WW-measured Chl-a (Fig. 2A), these Chl-a patches most likely reflected layers of L. polyedra that were migrating vertically.
The L. polyedra organisms started their descent from the surface around sunset (6:00 PM local time; Fig. 2 A and B), moving downward at ~380 μm s−1—about 1.4 m h−1—often slowing at depth during the subsequent daylight hours. The dense dinoflagellate aggregations arrived at the maximum migration depth (30 to 40 m) after ~18 to 24 h of downward swimming (Fig. 2B). These swimming speeds closely match laboratory measurements of L. polyedra swimming (100 to 400 μm s−1; refs. 17, 34, and 35), and are 10 times greater than their sinking speeds (~35 μm s−1; ref. 16). On cloudy days with less incoming solar radiation (May 9 and May 10, 2020, Fig. 2A), the subsurface vertical migration was much less apparent (no coherent Chl-a paths), suggesting that the intensity of daily solar radiation is an important trigger for vertical migration.
Subeuphotic Zone Nitrate Loss
The downward migration of the dinoflagellates terminated at the depth of the nitracline (strongest vertical gradient in nitrate concentration), where nitrate increased from undetectable levels to >10 mmol m−3 over only 2 to 3 m (Fig. 2B). At the beginning of our measurements, the nitracline was at a mean-isopycnal depth of ~30 m (Fig. 2C). Subeuphotic zone nitrate concentrations then decreased over time, resulting in a deepening of the nitracline from an isopycnal depth of ~30 m to ~40 m over a few days. Eventually, nitrate concentrations became undetectable at the maximum L. polyedra migration depth, far below the euphotic zone (Fig. 2C contours; Methods).
The loss of subeuphotic zone nitrate is apparent in comparisons of historical nitrate and temperature data to data gathered by the WW during the 2020 bloom. Measurements collected over 70 y (CalCOFI program, 1951 to 2020, Methods), 5 km from the study site, show the nitrate-temperature relationship to be extremely stable over time (Fig. 3), with a climatological relationship of the nitracline with the 14 °C isotherm (also in ref. 36). Our WW observations revealed a clear deficit of nitrate relative to those climatological values between temperatures of 11 °C and 14 °C during the bloom (Fig. 3). In the deeper, cold waters (<11 °C), the nitrate concentrations during the L. polyedra bloom were consistent with climatological values, suggesting that conditions remained typical for the area in the waters below the maximum migration depth of the dinoflagellates.
The nitrate deficit layer was roughly 25 m in vertical extent, extending from the base of the euphotic zone at ~15 m depth down to ~40 m depth. The maximum nitrate deficit for a given temperature was 14 mmol N m−3 relative to climatology (Fig. 3), reflecting a profound change in the distributions of inorganic nutrients during the bloom.
Relating the Nitrate Deficit to Vertical Migration and Phytoplankton Growth
We hypothesized that the subeuphotic zone nitrate deficit was created through nitrate uptake by the downward-migrating dinoflagellates. To test this, we quantified the amount and rate of nitrate loss due to biological uptake, independent of fluctuations driven by physical forcing, such as horizontal and vertical advection of nitrate gradients due to coastal currents and IWs.
Transformation to an isopycnal coordinate reference frame removes vertical fluctuations due to IWs, as described above. To remove nitrate fluctuations driven by currents acting on existing horizontal nitrate gradients, we tracked nitrate changes in individual water parcels defined by their unique temperature and salinity properties (SI Appendix, section 8). The oscillating horizontal currents caused individual water parcels to appear multiple times on an isopycnal at the mooring, allowing us to track nitrate changes separately for each parcel as a function of depth and time. This technique largely removed the effects of horizontal advection of nitrate variability at the mooring location (see Fig. 2C contours), allowing us to obtain estimates of the depth- and time-dependent biologically driven loss rates of nitrate. It also allowed us to obtain error estimates for our calculations (SI Appendix, Eqs. S9, S10, S12, S14, and S15).
Successive nitrate measurements in the same water masses allowed estimation of the biological nitrate loss rates, (mmol N m−3 d−1; SI Appendix, section 9). During a representative 2.5 d, from local noon on May 6th to local midnight on May 8th, the mode of nitrate loss rate was ~6 mmol N m−3 d−1 in the nitracline. The depth-integrated average nitrate loss rate was 31 ± 4 mmol N m−2 d−1 (434 ± 56 mg N m−2 d−1), which is 10 times greater than the previously estimated physical nitrogen supply rates over the inner shelf of SCB (36), and 20 times the vertical nitrate flux rate based on the Biologically Effective Upwelling Transport Index (37) at the sample time—emphasizing that the high nitrate demand during the red tide could not be met by typical physical nutrient delivery mechanisms. Integrating in time generates estimates of the amount of nitrate taken up by the dinoflagellates, (mmol N m−3) (SI Appendix, section 9 and Fig. S9). ranged from 0 to more than 12 mmol N m−3 in the ~10 to 13 m thick layer below the euphotic zone (Fig. 4A).
Fluctuations of nitrate in the layer of nitrate loss (Fig. 4A) coincide in time and space with the maximum migration depths of L. polyedra (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, the calculated nitrate loss rates are consistent with nitrate uptake rates reported from lab experiments with L. polyedra (1 to 4 mmol N m−3 d−1; ref. 38 and 39), and the estimated average N:Chl-a ratio of 5.3 is within the expected range for L. polyedra (40). Importantly, the time series of depth-integrated nitrate loss, , was significantly correlated with the time series of increases in both depth-integrated Chl-a concentration (R = 0.81, P < 0.0001) and depth-integrated turbidity measured at 532 nm (R = 0.82, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 4B)—directly linking the loss of nitrate to the gains of Chl-a and organic particle loads. The consistency of estimated nitrate loss rates with lab measurements of L. polyedra’s nitrate uptake rates, and the correlations of nitrate loss with increases in both Chl-a and turbidity, provide strong support for the hypothesis that the nitrate loss was caused by the uptake by L. polyedra as they migrated vertically into the subeuphotic zone nitrate pool. This nitrate uptake depleted the subeuphotic zone nitrate concentrations and deepened the nitracline (Fig. 4A). The measured descent rates of the Chl-a patches showed a maximum of ~35 m d−1 vertical travel; we suggest that the deepening of the nitracline eventually put it beyond the reach of the dinoflagellates’ daily migration, contributing to the eventual demise of the bloom.
Summary
Eppley et al. (17) hypothesized that exceptionally dense blooms can form by dinoflagellates migrating upward during the day to photosynthesize, and downward at night to take up nitrate and other nutrients from the deep nutrient pool below the euphotic zone. Despite laboratory experiments supporting this DVM-bloom hypothesis, a comprehensive test of this hypothesis in the field has been lacking. With a moored, multisensor autonomous profiling vehicle deployed during an intense red tide in Southern California, we showed 1) that the bloom-forming dinoflagellates vertically migrated, 2) that they took up nutrients from below the euphotic zone during the deep phase of the migration, and 3) that dinoflagellate abundances subsequently increased in proportion to the nutrient uptake. These observations confirm that vertical migration played a key role in maintaining the extreme biomass of the bloom.
Vertical migration allows dinoflagellates to acquire essential nutrients from below the waters in the euphotic zone. This enables motile dinoflagellates to overcome the inverse depth gradients of light and nutrients, and provides them a competitive advantage over nonmotile species in strongly stratified conditions. In the case reported here, the nitracline was ultimately forced to a depth far below the euphotic zone, suggesting that nonmotile phytoplankton such as the typically dominant diatom species would be starved of inorganic nutrients at depths with sufficient sunlight for photosynthesis and growth. The dense, prolonged bloom we observed in 2020 produced historically anomalous subsurface nutrient deficits, showing the potential of HABs to reshape the environmental and biogeochemical character of the coastal ocean. The continued development of autonomous systems equipped with high-resolution physical and biogeochemical sensors will advance our understanding of the interplay between environmental conditions and the behavior and metabolic needs of bloom-forming organisms. Including these biophysical feedbacks in numerical models is necessary to improve our ability to forecast HABs.
Methods
Our data were acquired by a moored ocean-wave-powered WW profiler, the long-term Del Mar Mooring (DM), the California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations (CalCOFI) program, and the Southern California Coastal Ocean Observing System. The WW is an autonomous vertical profiling system that allows the collection of high-resolution upper-ocean physical and biogeochemical properties (30, 31, 41). The WW was equipped with a conductivity-temperature-depth sensor (RBR Concerto), nitrate sensor (Submersible Ultraviolet Nitrate Analyzer (SUNA V2), Sea-Bird Scientific (SBE)), Chl-a fluorescence and optical backscatter sensor (SBE ECOPuck), and irradiance sensor (SBE OCR-504). The SUNA estimates nitrate concentration (unit: μM, 1 μM = 1 mmol m−3) based on the absorption spectrum of the water sample in the ultraviolet (UV) light region (42). Data analysis procedures for raw nitrate data quality control, nonphotochemical quenching correction for fluorescence, calculation of photosynthetically available radiation (PAR), and estimation of turbidity are presented in Supplementary Information (SI Appendix, sections 3–5). The SUNA was configured to sample with a duty cycle of 20 min h−1 with a 1 Hz sampling rate. All other sensors onboard the WW had a sampling frequency of 6 Hz. Power demands of the sensor suite required battery replacement weekly. Biooptical sensors malfunctioned during the first week deployment and therefore are not analyzed here. Over the two week period from May 5, 2020 to May 21, 2020, the gridded WW data had 1-m vertical resolution and ~15-min temporal resolution, determined by the sampling rate of SUNA and vertical speed of the WW, respectively.
The DM mooring (Fig. 1A) is a full water column physical–biogeochemical mooring maintained by the Ocean Time-Series Group at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography. It continuously measures ocean temperature, salinity, currents, oxygen concentration, fluorescence, and nutrients. Phytoplankton images (Fig. 1B) were captured at approximately 4-m depth by an IFCB (43, 44)—an automated underwater imaging system that captures high-resolution images of suspended particles, including L. polyedra. IFCB data from the DM are available at https://ifcb-data.whoi.edu/timeline?dataset=SIO_Delmar_mooring. Images were automatically analyzed following approaches previously developed for IFCB data (44, 45, with update to version 4 products). Biovolume was determined for each plankton target in IFCB images according to the distance map algorithm of Moberg and Sosik (46). Each biovolume was converted to cell carbon following the relationships described by Menden–Deuer and Lessard (47), and then carbon concentration in each sample was determined by summing up contributions from all plankton targets with equivalent spherical diameter ≥5 μm and dividing by the volume of seawater imaged. The IFCB is sensitive enough to reliably quantify cells above the 5-μm lower limit and is able to image cells up to ~180-μm. Phytoplankton in each IFCB sample were identified to species or genus levels with automated image classification approaches (convolutional neural network with Inception v3 architecture, initialized with weights from ImageNet, and fine-tuned with human labeled IFCB images). Kahru et al. (27) examined the daily average abundance of L. polyedra inferred from the IFCB and found correspondence with nearby microscope counts and satellite-measured Chl-a during this red tide.
The CalCOFI program is a long-term ocean monitoring program that has collected full water-column samples at specific stations off the coast of California since 1949 (quarterly since 1984). We used data collected at the innermost station on Line 93.3, located at 32.956 oN 117.305 oW, ~5 km from the DM location.
The CalCOFI and WW nitrate vs. temperature PDFs (Fig. 3) were calculated with nitrate data in 0.25 °C temperature bins and 1 mmol m−3 nitrate bins.
To convert from depth to isopycnal coordinates, raw physical and biogeochemical variables from each individual WW profile were interpolated onto uniformly gridded density bins (density interval of 0.02 kg m−3) (SI Appendix, Figs. S5 and S6). Mean isopycnal depths were calculated as the time-averaged interpolated depth for each gridded density bin over the course of the study period (SI Appendix, section 6).
To remove the effects of horizontal along-isopycnal advection from biological processes, for each isopycnal, data were binned by their level of spice (Temperature/Salinity properties; ref. 48) with a 0.005-kg m−3 interval. Points in the same spice bin on an isopycnal were assumed to be the same water mass (SI Appendix, Fig. S8). The rates of change of nitrate ( , units: mmol N m−3 d−1) were estimated from nitrate concentration changes within each individual water mass by first fitting an exponential function to pairs of nitrate measurements separated by a time interval (determined by the reappearance of a particular water mass at the mooring): . These fits gave estimates of —the nitrate-specific rate of change (units: d−1). The predicted biologically driven nitrate loss was then calculated by temporally iterating over a uniform time interval δt (details in SI Appendix, Fig. S9). The nitrate loss rate was determined by a temporal differentiation of the predicted nitrate loss (SI Appendix, Fig. S9). The associated error for each estimated quantity followed SE propagation procedures (SI Appendix).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
The funding for the study was provided by the Southern California Coastal Ocean Observing System (National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration award #NA21NOS0120088 and #NA16NOS0120022) to A.J.L., U.S., K.D., and B.Z. T.L.S. was supported by Office of Naval Research grant N00014-17-1-2391. H.M.S. was supported by the Simons Foundation (561126). The deployment of the IFCB at the Del Mar mooring was supported by a US NSF award to U.S., A.D.B., and colleagues (OCE-1810932) and H.M.S. (OCE-1810927). We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of Alexi Shalapyonok to the success of IFCB deployments on the mooring, as well as Tyler Hughen and Riley Baird’s contribution to fielding the Wirewalker-nitrate system.
Author contributions
A.J.L., C.R.A., U.S., and K.D. designed research; B.Z. and A.J.L. performed research; B.Z., P.J.S.F., U.S., A.D.B., and H.M.S. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; B.Z., A.J.L., P.J.S.F., T.L.S., and H.M.S. analyzed data; and B.Z., A.J.L., P.J.S.F., T.L.S., C.R.A., U.S., K.D., A.D.B., and H.M.S. wrote the paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Footnotes
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
Data, Materials, and Software Availability
Wirewalker observational data for this paper are available through Dryad: https://doi.org/10.6076/D1SW2S (49). Del Mar mooring and CalCOFI data are available at https://mooring.ucsd.edu/delmar1/delmar1_15/ (50) and https://calcofi.org/data/oceanographic-data/bottle-database/ (51), respectively.
Supporting Information
References
- 1.Ritzman J., et al. , Economic and sociocultural impacts of fisheries closures in two fishing-dependent communities following the massive 2015 US West Coast harmful algal bloom. Harmful Algae 80, 35–45 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Anderson D. M., et al. , Marine harmful algal blooms (HABs) in the United States: History, current status and future trends. Harmful Algae 102, 101975 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Franks P. J. S., Recent advances in modelling of harmful algal blooms. Global Ecol. Oceanogr. Harmful Algal Blooms 359–377 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brunson J. K., et al. , Biosynthesis of the neurotoxin domoic acid in a bloom-forming diatom. Science 361, 1356–1358 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ralston D. K., Stephanie K. M., Modeling harmful algal blooms in a changing climate. Harmful Algae 91, 101729 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Anderson D. M., Allan D. C., Gustaaf M. H., Progress in understanding harmful algal blooms: Paradigm shifts and new technologies for research, monitoring, and management. Annu. Rev. Marine Sci. 4, 143–176 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Anderson C. R., et al. , “Living with harmful algal blooms in a changing world: Strategies for modeling and mitigating their effects in coastal marine ecosystems” in Coastal and Marine Hazards, Risks, and Disasters, Shroder J. F., Ellis J. T., Sherman D. J., Eds. (Elsevier, 2015), pp. 495–561. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kenitz K. M., et al. , Environmental and ecological drivers of harmful algal blooms revealed by automated underwater microscopy. Limnol. Oceanogr. 68, 598–615 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 9.Spilling K., et al. , Shifting diatom—dinoflagellate dominance during spring bloom in the Baltic Sea and its potential effects on biogeochemical cycling. Front Marine Sci. 5, 327 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lewis J., Richard H., Lingulodinium polyedrum (Gonyaulax polyedra) a blooming dinoflagellate. Oceanogr. Marine Biol. 35, 89 (1997). [Google Scholar]
- 11.Berdalet E., et al. Understanding harmful algae in stratified systems: Review of progress and future directions. 101, 4–20 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jeong H. J., et al. , A hierarchy of conceptual models of red-tide generation: Nutrition, behavior, and biological interactions. Harmful Algae 47, 97–115 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hasle G. R., Phototactic vertical migration in marine dinoflagellates. Oikos 2, 162–175 (1950). [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kamykowski D., Zentara S.-J., The diurnal vertical migration of motile phytoplankton through temperature gradients. Limnol. Oceanogr. 22, 148–151 (1977). [Google Scholar]
- 15.Heaney S. I., Eppley R. W., Light, temperature and nitrogen as interacting factors affecting diel vertical migrations of dinoflagellates in culture. J. Plankton Res. 3, 331–344 (1981). [Google Scholar]
- 16.Holmes R. W., Williams P. M., Eppley R. W., RED WATER IN LA JOLLA BAY, 1964–1966 1. Limnol. Oceanogr. 12, 503–512 (1967). [Google Scholar]
- 17.Eppley R. W., Holm-Harisen O., Strickland J. D. H., Some observations on the vertical migration ofdinoflagellates. J. Phycol. 4, 333–340 (1968). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kamykowski D., Laboratory experiments on the diurnal vertical migration of marine dinoflagellates through temperature gradients. Marine Biol. 62, 57–64 (1981). [Google Scholar]
- 19.Peacock M. B., Kudela R. M., Evidence for active vertical migration by two dinoflagellates experiencing iron, nitrogen, and phosphorus limitation. Limnol. Oceanogr. 59, 660–673 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sengupta A., Carrara F., Stocker R., Phytoplankton can actively diversify their migration strategy in response to turbulent cues. Nature 543, 555–558 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dierssen H. M., et al. , Red and black tides: Quantitative analysis of water-leaving radiance and perceived color for phytoplankton, colored dissolved organic matter, and suspended sediments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 51, 2646–2659 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 22.Torrey H. B., An unusual occurrence of dinoflagellata on the California coast. Am. Nat. 36, 187–192 (1902). [Google Scholar]
- 23.Allen W. E., “Red Water” along the west coast of the United States in 1938. Science 88, 55–56 (1938). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Allen W. E., Twenty years’ statistical studies of marine plankton dinoflagellates of southern California. Am. Midland Nat. 26, 603–635 (1941). [Google Scholar]
- 25.Allen W. E., “Red Water” in La Jolla Bay in 1942. Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. 62, 262–264 (1943). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Allen W. E., “Red Water” in La Jolla Bay in 1945. Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc. 65, 149–153 (1946). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kahru M., et al. , Satellite detection of dinoflagellate blooms off California by UV reflectance ratios. Elem Sci. Anth 9, 00157 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wilson J. M., et al. , Substantial microbial community shifts in response to an exceptional harmful algal bloom in coastal Southern California. Elem Sci. Anth 10, 00088 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shipley K., et al. , Metabolic rates in the Agua Hedionda Lagoon during the 2020 Southern California red tide event. Elem Sci. Anth 10, 00018 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pinkel R., et al. , The Wirewalker: A vertically profiling instrument carrier powered by ocean waves. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 28, 426–435 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lucas A. J., Pinkel R., Alford M., Ocean wave energy for long endurance, broad bandwidth ocean monitoring. Oceanography 30, 126–127 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 32.Smayda T. J., Turbulence, watermass stratification and harmful algal blooms: An alternative view and frontal zones as “pelagic seed banks”. Harmful Algae 1, 95–112 (2002). [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lucas A. J., et al. , The green ribbon: Multiscale physical control of phytoplankton productivity and community structure over a narrow continental shelf. Limnol. Oceanogr. 56, 611–626 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hand W. G., Collard P. A., Davenport D., The effects of temperature and salinity change on swimming rate in the dinoflagellates, Gonyaulax and Gyrodinium. Biol. Bull 128, 90–101 (1965). [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mayali X., et al. , Bacteria-induced motility reduction in Lingulodinium Polyedrum (Dinophyceae). J. Phycol. 44, 923–928 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lucas A. J., Franks P. J. S., Dupont C. L., Horizontal internal-tide fluxes support elevated phytoplankton productivity over the inner continental shelf. Limnol. Oceanogr. Fluids Environ. 1, 56–74 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jacox M. G., et al. , Coastal upwelling revisited: Ekman, Bakun, and improved upwelling indices for the US West Coast. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 123, 7332–7350 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 38.Eppley R. W., Harrison W. G., "Physiological ecology of Gonyaulax polyedra, a red water dinoflagellate off southern California" in Proc. 1st conf. toxic dinoflagellate blooms, LoCicero V., Ed. (M.S.T.F., Wakefield, MA, 1975), pp. 11–22. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Harrison W. G., Nitrate metabolism of the red tide dinoflagellate Gonyaulax polyedra Stein. J. Exp. Marine Biol. Ecol. 21, 199–209 (1976). [Google Scholar]
- 40.Prézelin B. B., Samuelsson G., Matlick H. A., Photosystem II photoinhibition and altered kinetics of photosynthesis during nutrient-dependent high-light photoadaptation in Gonyaulax polyedra. Marine Biol. 93, 1–12 (1986). [Google Scholar]
- 41.Rainville L., Pinkel R., Wirewalker: An autonomous wave-powered vertical profiler. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 18, 1048–1051 (2001). [Google Scholar]
- 42.Johnson K. S., Coletti L. J., In situ ultraviolet spectrophotometry for high resolution and long-term monitoring of nitrate, bromide and bisulfide in the ocean. Deep Sea Res. Part I: Oceanogr. Res. Papers 49, 1291–1305 (2002). [Google Scholar]
- 43.Olson R. J., Sosik H. M., A submersible imaging-in-flow instrument to analyze nano-and microplankton: Imaging FlowCytobot. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 5, 195–203 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sosik H. M., Olson R. J., Automated taxonomic classification of phytoplankton sampled with imaging-in-flow cytometry. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 5, 204–216 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sosik H. M., et al. , hsosik/ifcb-analysis: IFCB-Analysis software system, initial formal release at v2 feature stage (Version v2.0, Zenodo, 2016), 10.5281/zenodo.153978. Deposited 2016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Moberg E. A., Sosik H. M., Distance maps to estimate cell volume from two-dimensional plankton images. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 10, 278–288 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 47.Menden-Deuer S., Lessard E. J., Carbon to volume relationships for dinoflagellates, diatoms, and other protist plankton. Limnol. Oceanogr. 45, 569–579 (2000). [Google Scholar]
- 48.Flament P., A state variable for characterizing water masses and their diffusive stability: Spiciness. Progress Oceanogr. 54, 493–501 (2002). [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zheng B., et al. , Wirewalker data collected during the 2020 Southern California red tide. Dryad. 10.6076/D1SW2S. Accessed 1 February 2021. [DOI]
- 50.Del Mar mooring data. https://mooring.ucsd.edu/delmar1/delmar1_15/. Accessed 1 February 2021.
- 51.CalCOFI data. https://calcofi.org/data/oceanographic-data/bottle-database/. Accessed 1 February 2021.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Wirewalker observational data for this paper are available through Dryad: https://doi.org/10.6076/D1SW2S (49). Del Mar mooring and CalCOFI data are available at https://mooring.ucsd.edu/delmar1/delmar1_15/ (50) and https://calcofi.org/data/oceanographic-data/bottle-database/ (51), respectively.