Skip to main content
Journal of Medical Genetics logoLink to Journal of Medical Genetics
. 1983 Aug;20(4):290–299. doi: 10.1136/jmg.20.4.290

Chiasma distribution, genetic lengths, and recombination fractions: a comparison between chromosomes 15 and 16.

N Saadallah, M Hultén
PMCID: PMC1049122  PMID: 6620330

Abstract

The chiasma distribution of bivalents 15 and 16 identified at diakinesis by a quadruple staining technique including DA-DAPI fluorescence has been investigated in two human males. The study has shown that chiasmata are not distributed at random. Both chromosomes have distally localised chiasmata, but in the long arm of chromosome 15 chiasmata are also found to be localised proximally, adjacent to the centromere. Genetic lengths and recombination fractions have been calculated from chiasma distribution data for the major bands of chromosomes 15 and 16 under the assumptions that there is no chromatid interference, no chiasma movement, and no difference between mitotic and meiotic band positions. The localisation of chiasmata implies much discrepancy in recombination patterns between the acrocentric chromosome 15 and the submetacentric chromosome 16.

Full text

PDF
295

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Caspersson T., Hultén M., Lindsten J., Zech L. Identification of chromosome bivalents in human male meiosis by quinacrine mustard fluorescence analysis. Hereditas. 1972;67(1):147–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1971.tb02368.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Francke U., Oliver N. Quantitative analysis of high-resolution trypsin-giemsa bands on human prometaphase chromosomes. Hum Genet. 1978 Dec 18;45(2):137–165. doi: 10.1007/BF00286957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hultén M. A., Palmer R. W., Laurie D. A. Chiasma derived genetic maps and recombination fractions: chromosome 1. Ann Hum Genet. 1982 May;46(Pt 2):167–175. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1982.tb00707.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hultén M. Chiasma distribution at diakinesis in the normal human male. Hereditas. 1974;76(1):55–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1974.tb01177.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hultén M., Lindsten J. Cytogenetic aspects of human male meiosis. Adv Hum Genet. 1973;4:327–387. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-8261-8_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kanda N., Kato H. Analysis of crossing over in mouse meiotic cells by BrdU labelling technique. Chromosoma. 1980;78(1):113–121. doi: 10.1007/BF00291910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Laurie D. A., Palmer R. W., Hultén M. A. Chiasma derived genetic lengths and recombination fractions: chromosomes 2 and 9. Ann Hum Genet. 1982 Jul;46(Pt 3):233–244. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1982.tb00715.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ruddle F. H. A new era in mammalian gene mapping: somatic cell genetics and recombinant DNA methodologies. Nature. 1981 Nov 12;294(5837):115–120. doi: 10.1038/294115a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Schweizer D., Ambros P., Andrle M. Modification of DAPI banding on human chromosomes by prestaining with a DNA-binding oligopeptide antibiotic, distamycin A. Exp Cell Res. 1978 Feb;111(2):327–332. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(78)90177-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shaw D. D., Knowles G. R. Comparative chiasma analysis using a computerised optical digitiser. Chromosoma. 1976 Dec 16;59(2):103–127. doi: 10.1007/BF00328480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Medical Genetics are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES