Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ZooKeys logoLink to ZooKeys
. 2023 Sep 8;1179:107–122. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1179.105734

Taxonomic insights into Panopeuslacustris Desbonne (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura) based on morphological and molecular data

Jani Jarquín-González 1,✉, Martha Valdez-Moreno 2, Rigoberto Rosas-Luis 1,3
PMCID: PMC10504639  PMID: 37719774

Abstract

The genus Panopeus belongs to the family Panopeidae and comprises a group of brachyuran crabs native to the American continent (except for P.africanus). However, taxonomic problems related to the presence of cryptic species have made it difficult to recognize the species and advance the biological knowledge of this group. Herein, a detailed description based on morphological and molecular data is provided for the species P.lacustris for the first time. Additionally, new morphological characters are proposed for the discrimination of the species. It is strongly suggested to increase the knowledge of the gene pool of the group, explore new morphological characters, and update the species descriptions to advance the group’s knowledge. This proposal will serve as a reference for future studies aimed at clarifying the taxonomic, conservation and ecological status of the species of Panopeus.

Key words: COI gen, Mexican Caribbean, Morphology, Taxonomy, True crabs

Introduction

The genus Panopeus H. Milne Edwards, 1834 belongs to the family Panopeidae Ortmann, 1893 and comprises a group of brachyuran crabs native to the American continent (except for P.africanus A. Milne-Edwards, 1867) and which are among the most abundant and conspicuous invertebrates of marine and coastal habitats (Benedict and Rathbun 1891; Schubart et al. 2000). They are mainly associated with soft sediment bottoms with seagrasses, mangrove forests, and oyster beds. However, according to Williams (1983), the exact ecological roles of Panopeus species could be uncertain because of imprecise taxonomic identifications.

Morphologically, they are distinguished by having five lateral teeth in the carapace, of which the first two can be partially fused; unequal chelipeds; and a prominent basal tooth on the dactylus in the major chela (Rathbun 1930; Williams 1983). But taxonomic and morphological problems related to the presence of cryptic species have made it difficult to recognize the species and advance the biological knowledge of this group (Williams 1983; Schubart et al. 2000). Martin and Abele (1986) point out that the morphology and ornamentation of the male gonopod are valid taxonomic characters in the differentiation of genera and species since they do not reflect adaptations to the habitat or types of feeding. According to Thoma et al. (2014), additional studies are necessary to include new morphological characters and genetic data to clarify the taxonomic status and the evolutionary relationships of Panopeus species. This method has been widely used to verify and delimit closely related species and groups of marine organisms, including decapods (Meyer et al. 2013; Magalhães et al. 2016; Yuan et al. 2022). According to Matzen da Silva et al. (2011), in decapods the maximum distance value of interspecific divergence, using COI gene, corresponds to 4.6% approximately.

Panopeus contains 16 species distributed in the Eastern Pacific, Western Atlantic, and Eastern Atlantic (Table 1). Eleven species were described between 1834 and 1880, and five species between 1915 and 1983. After this, the genus has not been revised and updated, and no new species have been recognised. A detailed description of P.lacustris is presented, and distributional and genetic information is added.

Table 1.

Species of the genus Panopeus including taxonomic (authorities, type locality, type status and museum respository), ecological (general distribution, type of habitat) and molecular data (BOLDSYSTEMS accession numbers available in dx.doi.org/10.5883/DS-PANOPE01).

Species Type Locality Type Material Distribution Habitat Bin
Panopeusafricanus A. Milne-Edwards, 1867 Gabon and Angola, Africa Syntype USNM 20263 Eastern Atlantic—Portugal and Spain to Angola (Manning and Holthuis 1981) Oyster cultch, intertidal, lagoon, river’s mouth (Manning and Holthuis 1981) BOLD:ADK5484
Panopeusamericanus de Saussure, 1857 Guadeloupe, Antilles Syntypes MHNG-ARTO-16417 to MHNG-ARTO-16422 Western Atlantic—USA (Florida), Gulf of Mexico, Antilles, north of South America, and Brazil (Almeida et al. 2010; Hollier 2018; Mantelatto et al. 2020) Under rocks, on mud beaches and in mangroves, on sand, mud, and shell bottoms. 0–25 m (Almeida et al. 2010) BOLD:ADU0973, BOLD:ADX1970
Panopeusaustrobesus Williams, 1983 Paranagua, Brazil Holotype USNM 59462 Western Atlantic—Brazil (Mantelatto et al. 2020) Sandy mud flats, under scattered rocks (Williams 1983) BOLD:ADT6599
Panopeusboekei Rathbun, 1915 Tumble-Down-Dick Bay, Netherlands Antilles Syntype RMNH.CRUS.D.2226 Western Atlantic—Antilles (St Thomas, St Eustatius, Bonaire, Curaçao) (Poupin 2018) Lagoon, mangrove, stony bottom, sand, among algae. 0–15 m (Rathbun 1930; Poupin 2018) -
Panopeuschilensis H. Milne Edwards & Lucas, 1843 Chile Syntype USNM 20264 Eastern Pacific—From Mexico (Sonora) to Chile (Hendrickx 1995) Among rocks. Intertidal (Rathbun 1930) BOLD:ADT4346
Panopeusconvexus A. Milne-Edwards, 1880 Chile Type probably in MNHN Eastern Pacific—Chile (Rathbun 1930) - -
Panopeusdiversus Rathbun, 1933 San Felipe, Baja California, Mexico Holotype USNM 67570 Eastern Pacific—Gulf of California (Hendrickx 1995) - -
Panopeusharttii Smith, 1869 Abrolhos Reefs, Brazil Syntype MCZH CRU-4806 Western Atlantic—USA (Florida), Southern Mexican Caribbean, Cuba, Virgin Islands, islands of the Caribbean Arc, Aruba, and Brazil. Central Atlantic—Ascension Island (Jarquín-González et al. 2022). Coralline reefs, rocky bottoms, dead coral. On calcareous algae blocks, and on Halimeda sp. 0–25 m (Jarquín-González et al. 2022) BOLD:AAX2632
Panopeusherbstii H. Milne Edwards, 1834 North American coast Type probably in MNHN Western Atlantic—USA (Massachusetts to Florida), Gulf of Mexico, Antilles, Caribbean Sea, north of South America, and Brazil (Mantelatto et al. 2020) Mangrove roots, sponges, coralline reefs. In muddy, shells or rocky bottom. In oyster beds. 0–22 m (Williams 1983) BOLD:ACC3621
Panopeuslacustris Desbonne in Desbonne & Schramm, 1867 Guadeloupe, Antilles Unknown Western Atlantic—USA (Georgia to Florida), Bermuda, Bahamas, Gulf of Mexico, Mexican Caribbean, Panama, Colombia, Cuba, Jamaica, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, islands of the Caribbean Arc, islands off Venezuela, and Brazil. Western Pacific: Hawaii (Abele and Kim 1986; Jarquín-González et al. 2022) Sandy and rocky beach, coralline reef (Porites sp.), and sabellarid reef. In Coralline rocks in Thalassiatestudinum beds. In sponge on mangrove. 0–2 m (Jarquín-González et al. 2022) BOLD:ACU0442
Panopeusmeridionalis Williams, 1983 Punta Carretas, Uruguay Holotype USNM 99846 Western Atlantic— Uruguay and Argentina (Spivak et al. 2019) Rocky coast (Williams 1983) -
Panopeusobesus Smith, 1869 Egmont Key, Florida, USA Syntype YPM IZ 000901.CRB Western Atlantic—USA (North Carolina to Florida), and Gulf of Mexico (Williams 1983) Mangrove roots. Marsh edge, shallow intertidal, and subtidal waters (Williams 1983) BOLD:ACC3621
Panopeusoccidentalis de Saussure, 1857 Guadeloupe, Antilles Syntypes MHNG-ARTO-16427-MHNG-ARTO-16429 Western Atlantic: from USA (North Carolina) to Brazil (Hollier 2018; Jarquín-González et al. 2022) Sandy, rocky and shells bottoms. Among rocks, mangrove roots, sponges, ascidians, and macroalgae. 1–20 m depth (Jarquín-González et al. 2022) BOLD:AAX2632
Panopeuspurpureus Lockington, 1877 Magdalena Bay, Baja California, Mexico Unknown Eastern Pacific—From Mexico (Baja California) to Peru (Hendrickx 1995; Vargas and Cortés 2019) Rocky intertidal zone, sandy beach, estuary, mangrove, coralline reef (Vargas and Cortés 2019) BOLD:ADT4345
Panopeusrugosus A. Milne-Edwards, 1880 Bahia, Brazil Type probably in MNHN Western Atlantic—Florida, Gulf of Mexico, Central America, West Indies, northern South America, and Brazil. Eastern Pacific—Panama Canal (Hendrickx 1995; Almeida et al. 2010) Estuaries, under tree trunks, rocks, and rubble, inside decaying tree trunks Also found in fresh water. In the intertidal and shallow subtidal (Almeida et al. 2010) BOLD:ADT6599
Panopeussimpsoni Rathbun, 1930 Saint George’s Sound, Florida, USA Holotype USNM 56382 Western Atlantic—Gulf of Mexico and Southern Mexican Caribbean (Williams 1983; Jarquín-González et al. 2022) Shallow intertidal and subtidal waters (Abele and Kim 1986) BOLD:ACC3621
Open in a new tab

Material and methods

Specimens identified as Panopeus sp. from El Uvero, 18°57.240'N, 87°36.900'W, Quintana Roo, Mexico (Fig. 1), and deposited in the Reference Collection of Benthos (ECOSUR) of El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Chetumal, Mexico were reviewed.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Location of El Uvero, in the State of Quintana Roo, on the Mexican Caribbean.

Morphological characteristics were observed using Zeiss Stemi DV4 stereoscopic microscope. For structures such as gonopods and maxillipeds, the dissection of appendages was generally performed on the right side of the body; the pieces were mounted in glycerol and sealed with transparent nail varnish. Photographs were taken using an Olympus SZX10 stereoscopic microscope, a Martin Microscope Company MDSLR-BX camera-microscope adapter, and a Canon EOS Rebel T3i digital reflex camera. Between 20 and 50 photos were taken of each specimen and its structures. Subsequently, focus stacking was performed with Helicon Focus v. 8.1.0 software. The morphological identification was based on the works of Rathbun (1930) and Williams (1983), while the morphological terminology followed that used by Davie et al. (2015).

Molecular analyses were performed to differentiate the Panopeus species and recognize their genetic divergence values. A small piece of muscle (1–3 mm3) was used to get the genomic DNA. A lysis buffer was used to digest the sample’s tissue with proteinase K, and the sample was digested in an oven for 12 h at 56 °C. The extraction was done through a 1.0 mm PALL glass fiber plate (Ivanova et al. 2006).

Cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene segment with an approximate length of 650 bp (Hebert et al. 2003) was amplified using the zooplankton primers (Prosser et al. 2013). DNA barcoding was conducted at Macrogen (Seoul, Republic of Korea). Sequence data, electropherograms, trace files, primer details, photographs, life stages, and collection localities for specimens using in the molecular analysis are available at BOLDSYSTEMS https://www.boldsystems.org within the dataset Panopeus from the Southern Mexican Caribbean and other regions of the Western Atlantic and Central Pacific (DS-PANOPE01) (https://www.doi.org/10.5883/DS-PANOPE01, accessed on July 13, 2023).

All the sequences obtained were compared with COI sequences previously published using the specimen identification tool in the Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD) (Sarmiento-Camacho and Valdez-Moreno 2018). Similarity values >98% were considered for all identified species, which confirmed their placement under different Barcode index numbers (BINs) (Ratnasingham and Hebert 2013). The criteria to assign taxonomic level identification using BOLD was a similarity value >99% (Sarmiento-Camacho and Valdez-Moreno 2018). To elaborate the ID tree, the COI gene sequences obtained in this work were used, as well as the sequences available in BOLDSYSTEMS under the following criteria: no taxonomic identification conflict, having geographical coordinates, and having high quality sequences.

All sequences were aligned using the ClustalW method (Thompson et al. 1994); the best substitution model was determined according to the lowest Bayesian information criterion score. As a result, a Tamura 3-parameter was used, using a discrete Gamma distribution (+G) with five rate categories as a model to construct a tree using the maximum likelihood analysis. The Kimura 2-parameter model was used to calculate the genetic divergences between the species (Kimura 1980). All studies used MEGA 11 software (Tamura et al. 2021).

Results

Order Decapoda Latreille, 1802

Infraorder Brachyura Latreille, 1802

Genus Panopeus H. Milne Edwards, 1834

. Panopeus lacustris

Desbonne in Desbonne & Schramm, 1867

8D40991B-3714-5974-9BA1-24EC7AD4E2E9

Figs 2 , 3 , 4 , 5

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Panopeuslacustris. ECOSUR-C1117, non-ovigerous female, 28.9 mm A body, dorsal view B body, ventral view C frontal margin D first two coalescent teeth E lateral teeth of the carapace F frontal view. ECOSUR C1195, non-ovigerous female, 9.5 mm G maxilliped H maxilliped 2 I maxilliped 3 J spot on isquium of maxilliped 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Panopeuslacustris. ECOSUR-C1117, non-ovigerous female, 28.9 mm A, B spots and spines in merus of chelipeds C major chela D minor chela.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

Panopeuslacustris. ECOSUR-C1197, male, 12.5 mm A body, dorsal view B body, dorsal view C frontal view D frontal margin E first two coalescent teeth F pollex and dactylus of chelipeds.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Open in a new tab

Panopeuslacustris. ECOSUR-C1197, male, 12.5 mm A, B gonopods 1 C detail of right gonopod 1 D detail of left gonopod 1 E gonopods 2.

Material examined.

Mexico • non-ovigerous female, 28.9 mm; Mexico, Quintana Roo, El Uvero; 18°57.240'N, 87°36.900'W; depth 0.5 m; 28 Jan. 2021; collectors Víctor Conde, Astrid Te leg.; in coralline rocks under Thalassiatestudinum; ECOSUR-C1117 • non-ovigerous female, 9.5 mm; same collection data as for preceding; ECOSUR-C1195 • one male, 19.3 mm; same collection data as for preceding; ECOSUR-C1196 • one male, 12.5 mm; same collection data as for preceding; ECOSUR-C1197.

Diagnosis

(emended for Williams, 1983). Carapace smooth or with a few setae, with transverse lines of granules, coarse granules on ocular and hepatic regions and along anterolateral margins. With five lateral teeth, the first two coalesced, separated by a shallow rounded notch (variable in depth). The second tooth is broader than the first, but the tips are almost equally prominent (variable in form). Third, fourth and fifth lateral teeth with prominent or semi-prominent acute tips. Third, maxilliped with one red or orange spot on the ventral surface side of the ischium. Cheliped with two distal spines in merus. The palm of chelipeds with a reticulated pattern of small purple granules. The reticulate pattern of color on the outer surface of the palm is continuous or not on its lower half. With random dark spots below the midline of the palm, ventral side of the palm, and ventral side of the cheliped merus. Dactylus of cheliped with a prominent proximal tooth. Pereopods are setose. Female: Abdomen setose, with six pereonites. Male: Abdomen with five pereonites. Gonopod 1 has two distal rows of conic spines that increase in thickness as they approach the anterior part of the outer margin, with six subdistal slender spinules on the inner margin.

Description.

Non-ovigerous female, ECOSUR-C1117, 28.9 mm (Fig. 2A, B). Carapace reddish-brown with creamy-white areas, smooth, surface finely granulate, hexagonal, convex, feebly areolated, with some lines of granules on hepatic and epigastric regions.

The frontal margin is sinuous and granulose, with a median closed fissure and rounded outer angles. First and second lateral teeth coalescent, separated by a shallow rounded notch. The first tooth is small, triangular, and has a prominent tip. The second tooth is broader than the first, convex, with a semi-prominent acute tip. The third tooth is convex, not outstanding, with semi-prominent acute tip. The fourth tooth is convex and outstanding, with a prominent acute tip. The fifth tooth is smaller than the fourth, outstanding spiniform (Fig. 2C–E).

Orbits suboval, wide; orbital region granular; dorsal inner orbital angle separated from the front by a shallow notch. Eyestalk stout, covered with fine granules. Antennular fossettes (Fig. 2F) are subrectangular and flattened; antennules are stout, folding transversely. The basal segment of the antenna is subrectangular; the flagellum is slender, tip reaches an exorbital angle. Epistome broad at base and pointed distally. Posterior margin of endostome with oblique ridges.

First and second maxillipeds with a few monochromatic chromatophores (Fig. 2G, H). The third maxilliped (Fig. 2I, J) completely covers the buccal orifice. Ischium subrectangular, granular, with a medial groove on dorsal surface; inner margin crenulated and setose; outer margin with rounded proximal projection; with one proximal orange spot on the ventral surface. Merus subquadrate, granular. Exopod narrow, longer than broad; inner margin with subdistal projection rounded and setose; outer margin with short distal setae.

Abdomen setose, with all pleonites well defined; first, second and third pleonite longer than broad fourth and fifth pleonites similar, broader than long; sixth pleonite is the largest, sinuous. Telson is subtriangular, broad, with rounded angles and a similar length to the sixth pleonite.

Chelipeds are unequal, robust, and finely granulate. Merus is broader than carpus, with two distal spines, no setose, and few dark spots ventrally (Fig. 3A, B). Carpus without groove parallel to the distal margin; reticulated pattern present only dorsolaterally; with one pointed tooth on the inner side. Palm with subdistal broad and triangular lobe near dactylus articulation; the reticulate pattern of color present dorsolaterally and does not continue on its lower half; with random dark spots below the midline of the palm, also present on its ventral side. The dark color of pollex does not continue on the palm. Major chela (Fig. 3C), pollex with seven teeth; with cusps raised above a straight line drawn between the angle at the juncture of a finger with anterior margin of palm and tip of the finger; first four teeth very broad; first and second teeth flattened, not separated, with blunt cusp probably due to wear; the third tooth is the largest of all, with a pointed cusp; fourth article broader than following teeth, with blunt cusp; fifth and seventh teeth smaller than sixth tooth, with blunt cusp each one. Dactylus of major chela, with one proximal tooth, prominent, longer than broad, with blunt cusp; with two reduced teeth; with one medial pointed process.

Minor chela (Fig. 3D) with a few small proximal teeth on the inner margin of the pollex. Pollex and dactylus of both chelipeds with white tips.

Ambulatory legs all setose dorsodistally; with dactylus small, broad, and orange tip. Second, third, and fourth pereopods with merus shorter than carpus; carpus inflated, longer than broad; propodus longer than merus, less inflated than carpus. Fifth pereopod is shorter than all, with merus and carpus of similar width; with propodus as long as merus.

Male, ECOSUR-C1197, 12.5 mm (Fig. 4A–C, E). The male morphology is like the female, but there are still some differences. The color of the carapace is dark-brown with creamy-white areas.

The frontal margin is rectilinear (Fig. 4D). With a row of setae on the posterolateral and hind margins. Abdomen with five pereonites (the third, fourth and fifth pereonites fused), with a few small setae.

The third pleonite with similar width but is shorter than the fourth pleonite; the fourth pleonite is shorter than the fifth pleonite; the fifth pleonite is twice as long as broad. Chelipeds (Fig. 4E), merus with similar length of the carpus; the reticulate pattern does not continue on its lower half, except in the minor chela, which slightly exceeds. Ambulatory legs are less setose than in females. Gonopod 1 (Fig. 5A–D), long and slender; slightly curving laterally; outer margin with two distal rows of conic spines that increase in thickness as they approach the anterior part of the outer margin; inner margin with six subdistal slender spinules. An accessory process long; dorsally expanded, with numerous ventrolateral spinules; anterior part narrow, ringed. The medial process is slightly sigmoidal, with subdistal spinules on the outer margin and robust proximal setae on the outer margin. Lateral approach bifid, with both teeth well developed. Gonopod 2 (Fig. 5E) is small, slightly sigmoidal.

Remarks.

Comparing morphological descriptions between specimens of Panopeuslacustris from Mexico, the USA, and the Virgin Islands, these were similar because they have a transverse line of granules on the carapace, the front margin of the carapace is granular and finely divided, the first two anterolateral carapace teeth are coalesced and separated by a round notch, the cheliped has broad proximal teeth on the pollex, and the pereopods are setose. Even so, there are some structural differences between them: P.lacustris from El Uvero, Mexico has a dark-brown or reddish-brown with creamy-white areas color pattern, while P.lacustris from Guadeloupe is dirty purple, and for Florida, USA, and St. Croix, VI the specimens are greyish; in P.lacustris from El Uvero, the carapace has some setae, whereas in P.lacustris from Guadeloupe, Florida, and St. Croix it is generally smooth. Table 2 provides more morphological comparisons.

Table 2.

Morphological comparison based on specimens of P.lacustris from the Western Atlantic.

P.lacustris Current work P.lacustris Desbonne 1867 P.lacustris Williams (1983)
Locality El Uvero, Quintana Roo, Mexico Guadeloupe, Antilles Florida, USA and St Croix, Virgin Island
Carapace– Dorsal coloring pattern Dark-brown or reddish-brown with creamy-white areas Dirty purple Grayish
Carapace– Setation With few setae Smooth or with few setae Smooth
Carapace– Frontal margin Granulose, with median closed fissure Granulose, with median closed fissure Granulose, with median closed fissure
Carapace–Transverse lines of granules Present Present Present
Carapace– First and second anterolateral teeth Coalesced Coalesced Coalesced
Carapace– Coalesced first and second anterolateral teeth Separated by shallow rounded notch - Separated by deep rounded notch
Carapace–Tips of lateral teeth Generally acute - Rectangular to acute
Third maxilliped– Spot color of ischium Orange - Red
Cheliped–Palm: Reticulate pattern on outer surface continues over its lower half No - Yes
Cheliped–Palm: Dark spots below the midline of the palm Present - -
Cheliped–Pollex: Shape of proximal teeth Broad - Broad
Cheliped–Dactylus: Proximal tooth shape Subrectangular - Rounded
Pereopods–Setation Setose Setose Setose
Open in a new tab
Molecular analysis

Molecular analysis based on the COI gene for specimens of P.lacustris from the Southern Mexican Caribbean (El Uvero, Quintana Roo), Western Atlantic (Bocas del Toro, Panama), and Central Pacific (Hawaii, USA) shows that they belong to the same taxonomic identity because their intraspecific divergence value was 0.27% (N = 11), which according to Matzen da Silva et al. (2011) and Jarquín-González et al. (2022), remains below the range of intraspecific divergence (3.7–4.9%) reported in decapods. Additionally, P.lacustris showed an interspecific genetic variation of 5.78% with P.herbstii and 7.57% with P.occidentalis, confirming that they are distinct taxonomic entities (Fig. 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Open in a new tab

COI identification tree shows the clustering of P.lacustris, P.herbstii and P.occidentalis from the Southern Mexican Caribbean, Western Atlantic and Central Pacific. Numbers on the branches indicate bootstrap support after 500 replications. The numbers after the names are BINs.

Discussion

Historically, Panopeus has been recognized as a taxonomically complex and cryptic group (Williams 1983; Schubart et al. 2000; Thoma et al. 2014). This assumption is valid because, for 40 years, no new species have been recognized, no detailed updated taxonomic revisions have been made, and no complete updated taxonomic corrections have been made for this genus.

According to Rathbun (1930), Williams (1965, 1983), Spivak and Luppi (2005) and Marochi and Masunari (2011) identification of Panopeus species can be performed using morphological characteristics such as the anterolateral teeth of the carapace, the presence or absence of granules in the carapace and chelipeds, the presence and coloring of the spot on the ischium of the third maxilliped, the presence or absence of a reticulate pattern of coloration on the external surface of the chelipeds, and the teeth shape of the pollex in the mayor chela. However, these morphological characteristics only have been analyzed in a few species (e.g., P.austrobesus, P.herbstii, P.lacustris, P.meridionalis, P.obesus and P.simpsoni) of the 16 that make up the genus.

According to Martin and Abele (1986), the male gonopod is a beneficial morphological characteristic for separating species and genera within Panopeidae. Unfortunately, the morphology of this structure is not detailed or illustrated in most Panopeus species but only available for P.africanus, P.americanus, P.austrobesus, P.chilensis, P.meridionalis and P.obesus (Martin and Abele 1986; Spivak and Luppi 2005; Marochi and Masunari 2011; Thoma et al. 2014), and currently for P.lacustris. In this study it was possible to detect some morphological characteristics that could be useful in the recognition of the species, these are: the presence and quantity of chromatophores in mouthparts (e.g., first and second maxillipeds), and the ornamentation of the merus of cheliped (e.g., setae, spines, presence, or absence of spots); however, it is necessary to explore the morphological variation between and within species to corroborate its usefulness. To standardize and update the morphological information of the species of the genus Panopeus, it is recommended considering the morphological characters proposed by Williams (1983), Martin and Abele (1986), and this work.

Regarding molecular analysis, it is suggested to obtain genetic material for the species P.boekei, P.convexus, P.diversus and P.meridionalis since they do not have nuclear or mitochondrial sequences; complement the information associated with the genetic sequences of the species, including the collection site, type of habitat and photographs; and, resolve conflicts of identification for some COI sequences of the genus, for example, the species P.americanus presented two different BINs (BOLD:ADU0973, BOLD:ADX1970).

In addition, Thoma et al. (2014) mention that despite the species P.herbstii, P.obesus and P.simpsoni being currently considered different species (based on allozymes, hemocyanins, ecological and morphological differences), the available sequences of the mitochondrial (e.g., COI, 16S) gene do not help distinguish between them, probably because they have recently separated and have accumulated few mutations. Probably the same could be happening with the species P.harttii and P.occidentalis since they share the same BIN (BOLD:AAX2632).

It is fundamental to increase the knowledge of the gene pool of the group and the morphological characters that help separate species; these aspects will facilitate more detailed studies to detect general distribution patterns, link different life stages, and recognize cryptic species. With this, the taxonomic identification of Panopeus species will be precise.

Conclusion

It is a priority that redescriptions of the species begin to be carried out, or provide detailed descriptions for male and female specimens, incorporate new morphological characteristics, and include genetic sequences. In this way, it will be possible to advance the taxonomic, and consequently other areas as ecological and conservation knowledge of the genus Panopeus. Furthermore, these results reinforce that studies with morphological and molecular approaches are useful for studying the biological diversity of marine and coastal decapods as previously detected for members of these group and allies.

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Panopeus lacustris

Acknowledgements

We thank Alma Estrella García Morales (ECOSUR) for helping us process DNA barcoding as part of the CONAHCYT network Mexican Barcode of Life (MEXBOL). Thanks to José Ángel Cohuo Colli (ECOSUR) for taking pictures of organisms and morphological structures. Special thanks are given to Luis Fernando Carrera-Parra (ECOSUR) for supporting the material deposited in the Coastal Benthos Reference Collection. Thanks to Víctor Conde and Astrid Te for helping us to collect biological material. Thanks to Adriana Cruise for her support in the corrections of the English language.

Citation

Jarquín-González J, Valdez-Moreno M, Rosas-Luis R (2023) Taxonomic insights into Panopeus lacustris Desbonne (Crustacea, Decapoda, Brachyura) based on morphological and molecular data. ZooKeys 1179: 107–122. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1179.105734

Funding Statement

This work was supported partially by the projects “Cephalopods and Crustaceans of the Mexican CaribbeanSea”, and “Isotopic Niches of key marine invertebrates to Understanding the Degradation of coral reefs in the Caribbean (ORDECYT-PRONACES/1312440/2020)”

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This research was funded by CONAHCYT with the project FORDECYT-PRONACES/1312440/2020 entitled Nichos isotópicos de invertebrados marinos clave para entender la degradación de los arrecifes coralinos del Caribe, and the postdoctoral research grant “Estancias Posdoctorales por México 2021–2022” (JJG).

Author contributions

Jani Jarquín González (JJG), Martha Valdez Moreno (MVM), Rigoberto Rosas Luis (RRL). Conceptualization, JJG, MVM and RRL; Methodology, JJG, MVM and RRL; Software, JJG and MVM; Resources, RRL and MVM; Writing—original draft preparation, JJG; Writing—Review & Editing, MVM and RRL.

Author ORCIDs

Jani Jarquín-González https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8492-1725

Martha Valdez-Moreno https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5369-1667

Rigoberto Rosas-Luis https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7785-7120

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

References

  1. Abele LG, Kim W. (1986) An Illustrated Marine Decapod Crustacea of Florida. Department of Environmental Regulation, State of Florida, 784 pp. [Google Scholar]
  2. Almeida AO, Souza GBG, Boehs G, Bezerra LE. (2010) A shallow-water anomuran and brachyuran crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda) from southern Bahia, Brazil. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research (Chile) 38(3): 329–376. 10.3856/vol38-issue3-fulltext-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Benedict JE, Rathbun MJ. (1891) The genus Panopeus. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 14(858): 355–385[, 6 pls]. 10.5479/si.00963801.14-858.355 [DOI]
  4. Davie PJF, Guinot D, Ng PKL. (2015) Anatomy and functional morphology of Brachyura. In: Castro P, Davie PJF, Guinot D, Schram F, Von Vaupel Klein C. (Eds) Treatise on Zoology – Anatomy, Taxonomy, Biology – The Crustacea, complementary to the volumes translated from the French of the Traité de Zoologie, 9(C) (I), Decapoda: Brachyura (Part 1).Brill, Leiden, Boston, 11–163. 10.1163/9789004190832_004 [DOI]
  5. Desbonne I. (1867) Crustacés de la Guadeloupe, d’après un manuscrit du Docteur Isis Desbonne comparé avec les échantillons de Crustacés de sa collection et les dernières publications de MM. Henri de Saussure et William Stimpson. Premiere partie.Brachyures. Imprimerie du Gouvernment, Basse-Terre, 60 pp. 10.5962/bhl.title.10402 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. (2003) Biological Identifications through DNA Barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences 270(1512): 313–321. 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hendrickx M. (1995) Checklist of brachyuran crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda) from the Eastern Tropical Pacific. Bulletin de l’Institut royal des sciences naturelles de Belgique. Biologie 65: 125–150. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hollier J. (2018) The Decapoda (Crustacea) described by Henri de Saussure. Revue Suisse de Zoologie 125: 291–298. 10.5281/zenodo.1414227 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ivanova NV, Dewaard JR, Hebert PDN. (2006) An Inexpensive, Automation-Friendly Protocol for Recovering High-Quality DNA. Molecular Ecology Notes 6(4): 998–1002. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01428.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jarquín-González J, Valdez-Moreno M, Rosas-Luis R. (2022) An approach to the diversity of Achelata and Brachyura (Crustacea, Decapoda) from the Southern Mexican Caribbean. Diversity (Basel) 14(8): 649. 10.3390/d14080649 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kimura M. (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16(2): 111–120. 10.1007/BF01731581 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Magalhães T, Robles R, Felder DL, Mantelatto FL. (2016) Integrative taxonomic study of the Purse crab genus Persephona Leach, 1817 (Brachyura: Leucosiidae): Combining morphology and molecular data. PLoS ONE 11(4): e0152627. 10.1371/journal.pone.0152627 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  13. Manning RB, Holthuis LB. (1981) West African Brachyuran crabs. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 306(306): 1–353. 10.5479/si.00810282.306 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mantelatto FL, Tamburus AF, Magalhães T, Buranelli RC, Terossi M, Negri M, Castilho AL, Costa RC, Zara FJ. (2020) Checklist of decapod crustaceans from the coast of the São Paulo State (Brazil) supported by integrative molecular and morphological data: III. Infraorder Brachyura Latreille, 1802. Zootaxa 4872(1): 1–108. 10.11646/zootaxa.4872.1.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Marochi MZ, Masunari S. (2011) Os caranguejos Eriphiidae, Menippidae, Panopeidae e Pilumnidae (CrustaceaBrachyura) de águas rasas do litoral do Paraná, com chave pictórica de identificação para as espécies. Biota Neotropica 11(3): 21–33. 10.1590/S1676-06032011000300001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Martin JW, Abele LG. (1986) Notes on male pleopod morphology in the Brachyuran crab family Panopeidae Ortmann, 1893, sensu Guinot (1978) (Decapoda). Crustaceana 50(2): 182–198. 10.1163/156854086X00205 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Matzen da Silva J, Creer S, dos Santos A, Costa AC, Cunha MR, Costa FO, Carvalho GR. (2011) Systematic and evolutionary insights derived from mtDNA COI barcode diversity in the Decapoda (Crustacea: Malacostraca). PLoS ONE 6(5): e19449. 10.1371/journal.pone.0019449 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  18. Meyer R, Weis A, Melzer RR. (2013) Decapoda of southern Chile: DNA barcoding and integrative taxonomy with focus on the genera Acanthocyclus and Eurypodius. Systematics and Biodiversity 11(3): 389–404. 10.1080/14772000.2013.833143 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Poupin J. (2018) Les crustacés Décapodes des Petites Antilles, avec de nouvelles observations pour St. Martin, La Guadeloupe et La Martinique. Patrimoines Naturels, Paris, France, 264 pp. [Google Scholar]
  20. Prosser S, Martínez-Arce A, Elías-Gutiérrez M. (2013) A new set of primers for COI amplification from freshwater microcrustaceans. Molecular Ecology Resources 13: 1151–1155. 10.1111/1755-0998.12132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rathbun MJ. (1930) The cancroid crabs of America of the families Euryalidae, Portunidae, Atelecyclidae, Cancridae, and Xanthidae. Bulletin of the United States National Museum (i–xvi): 1–609[, 85 figs, 230 pls]. 10.5479/si.03629236.152.i [DOI]
  22. Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN. (2013) A DNA-based registry for all animal species: The Barcode Index Number (BIN) system. PLoS ONE 8(7): e66213. 10.1371/journal.pone.0066213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  23. Sarmiento-Camacho S, Valdez-Moreno M. (2018) DNA barcode identification of commercial fish sold in Mexican markets. Genome 61(6): 457–466. 10.1139/gen-2017-0222 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Schubart C, Neigel J, Felder D. (2000) Molecular phylogeny of mud crabs (Brachyura: Panopeidae) from the northwestern Atlantic and the role of morphological stasis and convergence. Marine Biology 137(1): 11–18. 10.1007/s002270000325 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Spivak ED, Luppi TA. (2005) Southern range extension of two western Atlantic intertidal mud crabs: Panopeusmeridionalis and Eurypanopeusdepressus (Crustacea: Brachyura: Panopeidae) in Argentinian waters. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 118(3): 551–557. 10.2988/0006-324X(2005)118[551:SREOTW]2.0.CO;2 [DOI]
  26. Spivak ED, Farias NE, Ocampo EH, Lovrich GA, Luppi TA. (2019) Annotated catalogue and bibliography of marine and estuarine shrimps, lobsters, crabs and their allies (Crustacea: Decapoda) of Argentina and Uruguay (Southwestern Atlantic Ocean). Frente Maritimo 26: 1–178. http://hdl.handle.net/11336/121964 [Google Scholar]
  27. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. (2021) MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 11. Molecular Biology and Evolution 38(7): 3022–3027. 10.1093/molbev/msab120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Thoma BP, Guinot D, Felder DL. (2014) Evolutionary relationships among American mud crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Xanthoidea) inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial markers, with comments on adult morphology. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 170(1): 86–109. 10.1111/zoj.12093 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. (1994) CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22(22): 4673–4680. 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Vargas R, Cortés J. (2019) New records of marine decapods and stomatopods in Área de Conservación Guanacaste (ACG): Four years of marine biodiversity inventorying. Marine Biodiversity Records 12(1): 21. 10.1186/s41200-019-0181-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Williams AB. (1965) Marine decapod crustaceans of the Carolinas. Fishery Bulletin 65(1): 1–298. [Google Scholar]
  32. Williams AB. (1983) The mud crab Panopeusherbstii, s.l. Partition into six species (Decapoda: Xanthidae). Fish Bulletin 81(4): 863–882. [Google Scholar]
  33. Yuan Z, Jiang W, Sha Z. (2022) A review of the common crab genus Macromedaeus Ward, 1942 (Brachyura, Xanthidae) from China Seas with description of a new species using integrative taxonomy methods. PeerJ 10: e12735. 10.7717/peerj.12735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Panopeus lacustris
zookeys.1179.105734-treatment1.xml (32.7KB, xml)

Data Availability Statement

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.

Articles from ZooKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES