Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1988 Nov;88(3):618–625. doi: 10.1104/pp.88.3.618

Interaction of Heat and Salt Shock in Cultured Tobacco Cells 1

H Michael Harrington 1,2, David M Alm 1,2
PMCID: PMC1055634  PMID: 16666358

Abstract

Cultured tobacco cells (Nicotiana tabacum L. var Wisconsin-38) developed tolerance to otherwise nonpermissive 54°C treatment when heat-shocked at 38°C (2 h) but not at 42°C. Heat-shocked cells (38°C) exhibited little normal growth when the 54°C stress came immediately after heat shock and normal growth when 54°C stress was administered 8 hours after heat shock. Heat shock extended the length of time that the cells tolerated 54°C. Tobacco cells developed tolerance to otherwise lethal 2% NaCl treatment when salt-shocked (1.2% NaCl for 3 hours). The time course for salt tolerance development was similar to that of thermotolerance. Heat-shocked cells (38°C) developed tolerance of nonpermissive salt stress 8 hours after heat shock. Alternatively, cells heat-shocked at 42°C exhibited immediate tolerance to lethal salt stress followed by a decline over 8 hours. Radioactive methionine incorporation studies demonstrated synthesis of heat shock proteins at 38°C. The apparent molecular weights range from 15 to 115 kilodaltons with a protein complex in the 15 to 20 kilodalton range. Synthesis of heat shock proteins appeared to persist at 42°C but with large decreases in incorporation into selected heat shock protein. During salt shock, the synthesis of normal control proteins was reduced and a group of salt shock proteins appeared 3 to 6 h after shock. Similarities between the physiology and salt shock proteins/heat shock proteins suggest that both forms of stress may share common elements.

Full text

PDF
625

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ericson M. C., Alfinito S. H. Proteins Produced during Salt Stress in Tobacco Cell Culture. Plant Physiol. 1984 Mar;74(3):506–509. doi: 10.1104/pp.74.3.506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gamborg O. L. The effects of amino acids and ammonium on the growth of plant cells in suspension culture. Plant Physiol. 1970 Apr;45(4):372–375. doi: 10.1104/pp.45.4.372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Harrington H. M., Henke R. R. Amino Acid Transport into Cultured Tobacco Cells: I. LYSINE TRANSPORT. Plant Physiol. 1981 Feb;67(2):373–378. doi: 10.1104/pp.67.2.373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Heikkila J. J., Papp J. E., Schultz G. A., Bewley J. D. Induction of heat shock protein messenger RNA in maize mesocotyls by water stress, abscisic Acid, and wounding. Plant Physiol. 1984 Sep;76(1):270–274. doi: 10.1104/pp.76.1.270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hurkman W. J., Tanaka C. K. The effects of salt on the pattern of protein synthesis in barley roots. Plant Physiol. 1987 Mar;83(3):517–524. doi: 10.1104/pp.83.3.517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kanabus J., Pikaard C. S., Cherry J. H. Heat Shock Proteins in Tobacco Cell Suspension during Growth Cycle. Plant Physiol. 1984 Jul;75(3):639–644. doi: 10.1104/pp.75.3.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Key J. L., Lin C. Y., Chen Y. M. Heat shock proteins of higher plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jun;78(6):3526–3530. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.6.3526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lin C. Y., Roberts J. K., Key J. L. Acquisition of Thermotolerance in Soybean Seedlings : Synthesis and Accumulation of Heat Shock Proteins and their Cellular Localization. Plant Physiol. 1984 Jan;74(1):152–160. doi: 10.1104/pp.74.1.152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lindquist S. The heat-shock response. Annu Rev Biochem. 1986;55:1151–1191. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.55.070186.005443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mansfield M. A., Key J. L. Synthesis of the low molecular weight heat shock proteins in plants. Plant Physiol. 1987 Aug;84(4):1007–1017. doi: 10.1104/pp.84.4.1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. ROSEN H. A modified ninhydrin colorimetric analysis for amino acids. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1957 Mar;67(1):10–15. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(57)90241-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ramagopal S. Differential mRNA transcription during salinity stress in barley. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Jan;84(1):94–98. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.1.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ramagopal S. Salinity stress induced tissue-specific proteins in barley seedlings. Plant Physiol. 1987 Jun;84(2):324–331. doi: 10.1104/pp.84.2.324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Singh N. K., Handa A. K., Hasegawa P. M., Bressan R. A. Proteins Associated with Adaptation of Cultured Tobacco Cells to NaCl. Plant Physiol. 1985 Sep;79(1):126–137. doi: 10.1104/pp.79.1.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Vierling E., Key J. L. Ribulose 1,5-Bisphosphate Carboxylase Synthesis during Heat Shock. Plant Physiol. 1985 May;78(1):155–162. doi: 10.1104/pp.78.1.155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wu M. T., Wallner S. J. Heat stress responses in cultured plant cells : development and comparison of viability tests. Plant Physiol. 1983 Jul;72(3):817–820. doi: 10.1104/pp.72.3.817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES