Skip to main content
PMC home page
Cardiovascular Diabetology logoLink to Cardiovascular Diabetology
. 2023 Oct 17;22:278. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-02019-8

SGLT2 inhibition, circulating metabolites, and atrial fibrillation: a Mendelian randomization study

Jiang Li 1,#, Yuefeng Yu 1,#, Ying Sun 1, Bowei Yu 1, Xiao Tan 2,3, Bin Wang 1, Yingli Lu 1, Ningjian Wang 1,✉
PMCID: PMC10583416  PMID: 37848934

Abstract

Background

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have shown promise in reducing the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the results are controversial and the underlying metabolic mechanism remains unclear. Emerging evidence implied that SGLT2 inhibitors have extra beneficial metabolic effects on circulating metabolites beyond glucose control, which might play a role in reducing the risk of AF. Hence, our study aimed to investigate the effect of circulating metabolites mediating SGLT2 inhibition in AF by Mendelian randomization (MR).

Methods

A two-sample and two-step MR study was conducted to evaluate the association of SGLT2 inhibition with AF and the mediation effects of circulating metabolites linking SGLT2 inhibition with AF. Genetic instruments for SGLT2 inhibition were identified as genetic variants, which were both associated with the expression of SLC5A2 gene and glycated hemoglobin level (HbA1c). Positive control analysis on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was conducted to validate the selection of genetic instruments.

Results

Genetically predicted SGLT2 inhibition (per 1 SD decrement in HbA1c) was associated with reduced risk of T2DM (odds ratio [OR] = 0.63 [95% CI 0.45, 0.88], P = 0.006) and AF (0.51 [0.27, 0.97], P = 0.039). Among 168 circulating metabolites, two metabolites were both associated with SGLT2 inhibition and AF. The effect of SGLT2 inhibition on AF through the total concentration of lipoprotein particles (0.88 [0.81, 0.96], P = 0.004) and the concentration of HDL particles (0.89 [0.82, 0.97], P = 0.005), with a mediated proportion of 8.03% (95% CI [1.20%, 14.34%], P = 0.010) and 7.59% ([1.09%, 13.34%], P = 0.011) of the total effect, respectively.

Conclusions

This study supported the association of SGLT2 inhibition with a reduced risk of AF. The total concentration of lipoprotein particles and particularly the concentration of HDL particles might mediate this association. Further mechanistic and clinical studies research are needed to understand the mediation effects of circulating metabolites especially blood lipids in the association between SGLT2 inhibition and AF.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12933-023-02019-8.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation, Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition, Circulating metabolites, Mendelian randomization

Introduction

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are a class of oral antidiabetic drugs, which reduce serum glucose concentration by inhibiting the reabsorption of glucose in proximal tubules and promoting urinary glucose excretion. [1] Compelling evidence has shown their benefit in improving cardiovascular, heart failure, and renal outcomes. [2–5] In addition, emerging evidence suggested their potential in decreasing the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), but the results are controversial and the underlying metabolic mechanism remains unclear. [6–9].

SGLT2 inhibitors were believed to have extra beneficial metabolic effects beyond glycemic control, [10, 11] which might play an important role in improving cardiovascular and renal outcomes. Previous studies have demonstrated that SGLT2 inhibitors have remarkable effects on circulating metabolites, especially amino acids, ketone bodies, and lipids. [12–14] However, the associations between SGLT2 inhibition and circulating metabolites remain unclear, particularly for blood lipids. Some evidence implied that SGLT2 inhibition increased the total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol levels, [15, 16] whereas others failed to observe a significant change in the serum lipid profile. [17, 18] The discrepancy in these studies might be partially attributed to the limited sample size and the presence of residual confounding.

Mendelian randomization (MR) is a powerful approach that uses genetic variants associated with exposure as instruments to examine the potential causal association between exposure and outcome. MR is less likely to be affected by confounding or reverse causality, [19] as it mimics the randomized controlled trials by randomly assigning genetic variants at the time of conception. [20].

Increasing evidence suggested a correlation between metabolism disorders and the occurrence of AF. [21, 22] In a recent study that comprehensively investigated metabolomic characterization of atrial fibrillation, [23] Lu et al. found that circulating metabolites including amino acids and phospholipids might serve as biomarkers for AF onset and progression. For blood lipids, a systematic review and meta-analysis of large cohort studies found an inverse relationship between total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and HDL-cholesterol levels and AF risk. [24] These findings suggested the potential role of circulating metabolites in the pathogenies of AF.

Therefore, we hypothesized that circulating metabolites might mediate the effect of SGLT2 inhibition on AF. In the present study, we first conducted a two-sample MR to examine the association between SGLT2 inhibition and AF. Second, we performed a two-step MR study to establish the potential metabolic pathway from SGLT2 inhibition to AF through circulating metabolites, particularly blood lipids. We investigated the possible causal effect of SGLT2 inhibition on circulating metabolites, which would provide insights into the metabolic mechanism linking the effect of SGLT2 inhibition with AF.

Methods

Study design

The current study was conducted using a two-sample MR design (Fig. 1). To ensure the validity of potential causal effects, MR analyses needed to fulfill three core assumptions: [19] (1) genetic variants are robustly associated with the exposure (relevance), (2) genetic variants are independent of confounders (exchangeability), (3) genetic variants influence the outcome only through the exposure (exclusion restriction). This study was reported following the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Using Mendelian Randomization (STROBE-MR) guidelines. [25].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Overview of the study design. (a) The flowchart of evaluating the effects of circulating metabolites in mediating the effect of SGLT2 inhibition on atrial fibrillation. (b) The framework of the two-step MR. (c) The flow diagram of conducting the two-step MR step by step, which involved the selection of circulating metabolites HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; MVMR, multivariable Mendelian randomization; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; UVMR, univariable Mendelian randomization

Genetic instruments for SGLT2 inhibition

The identification of genetic variants for SGLT2 inhibition followed four steps (Fig. 1a). First, we used publicly available data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) [26] and eQTLGen Consortium [27] to select genetic variants, which were associated with mRNA expression level of the SLC5A2 (gene of SGLT2). Second, we estimated the associations of each SLC5A2 variant with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level, an indicator of glucose-lowering effect, and selected variants that are significantly associated with HbA1c (P < 1 × 10− 4). The genome-wide association study (GWAS) data of HbA1c was from 344,182 unrelated individuals of European ancestry without diabetes mellitus in the UK Biobank (Supplementary Table 1). Third, colocalization analysis was performed to confirm that SLC5A2 and HbA1c share the same causal variant. [28] Evidence for colocalization was defined as a posterior probability > 70% for a shared causal variant. [29] Finally, we clumped those genetic variants to a linkage disequilibrium (LD) of r2 < 0.8 within 250 kb using the 1,000 Genomes European reference panel.

Genetic instruments for circulating metabolites

We systematically searched 249 nuclear magnetic resonance circulating metabolites from 121,000 European ancestry participants generated by Nightingale Health. [30] These metabolic biomarker data comprises 168 biomarker absolute concentrations and 81 biomarker ratios, mainly covering lipids and lipoprotein particles sub-fractions (81%) but also amino acids, cholesterol, esterified cholesterol, free cholesterol, cholines, compounds, fatty acids, glycolysis, ketone bodies, phospholipids, lipoprotein particles size, apolipoproteins, and triglycerides. The absolute concentrations of 168 biomarkers were included for MR analysis. The full GWAS summary statistics of the 168 biomarkers were publicly available through the IEU Open-GWAS Project database with GWAS identifier ‘met-d’ (Supplementary Table 1). [31] We restricted the analyses to genetic variants of each biomarker that were at a genome-wide significant (P < 5 × 10− 8) and were independent of each other (LD r2 < 0.01 within 10,000 kb).

Study outcomes

We obtained publicly available GWAS summary data for AF from Atrial Fibrillation Genetics (AFGen) Consortium (15,979 cases and 102,776 controls, European ancestry) (Supplementary Table 1). [32] The ascertainment of AF was based on an electrocardiograph recording or outpatient diagnosis. To validate our selection of instruments for SGLT2 inhibition, positive control analysis was performed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The summary data for T2DM were from Diabetes Genetics Replication And Meta-analysis (DIAGRAM) consortium, which accumulated association summary statistics from 122 GWAS in 180,834 T2DM cases and 1,159,055 controls across five ancestry groups. We extracted European ancestry-specific GWAS data (80,154 cases and 853,816 controls) for this study. [33].

Statistical analyses

MR analysis to estimate the effects of SGLT2 inhibition on AF and T2DM

We applied two-sample univariable MR (UVMR) to estimate the effect of SGLT2 inhibition on AF and T2DM. Before MR analysis, we used Mendelian Randomization Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier (MR-PRESSO) [34] and radial MR [35] to detect and correct possible horizontal pleiotropy and heterogeneity by removing outlying genetic variants. The inverse variant weight (IVW) method was used as the main analysis, which can provide the most precise and powerful estimates when all genetic variants are valid instruments. [36, 37].

Mediation MR analysis linking SGLT2 inhibition with AF via circulating metabolites

Two-step MR was conducted to estimate the mediation effect of circulating metabolites on the association between SGLT2 inhibition and AF (Fig. 1b and c). First, we estimated the effect of SGLT2 inhibition on 168 circulating metabolites (𝞫1) using UVMR. Second, we evaluated the effect of those metabolites that showed statistically significant associations with SGLT2 inhibition on AF using UVMR. Then, we further screened the metabolites that demonstrated significant associations with AF and performed multivariable MR (MVMR) to evaluate the effect of each metabolite on AF after adjusting for the genetic effect of SGLT2 inhibition (𝞫2). The mediation proportion of each metabolite in the association between SGLT2 inhibition and AF was calculated as the product of 𝞫1and 𝞫2 divided by the total effect of SGLT2 inhibition on AF. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the mediation proportions were calculated through the delta method. [38].

Sensitivity analysis

In UVMR analysis assessing the effects of SGLT2 inhibition on AF and T2DM, we performed the MR-Egger, MR-PRESSO, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode methods as sensitivity analyses. The MR-Egger method examines whether there is directional pleiotropy based on its intercept term, where a value that differs from zero indicates that the presence of directional pleiotropy and the IVW estimate is biased. [39] In addition, the MR-PRESSO method can also determine the presence of directional pleiotropy by detecting possible outliers and recalculating estimates after removing outliers. [34] The weighted median method provides a reliable estimate if at least 50% of the instruments are valid. [40] The simple mode and weighted mode methods provide a reliable estimate when the horizontal pleiotropy in the largest cluster is zero. [41, 42] In UVMR analysis evaluating the effects of SGLT2 inhibition on metabolites and the effects of metabolites on AF, we used MR-Egger and MR-PRESSO methods to validate the robustness of the MV-IVW results. In MVMR, we performed MVMR-Egger methods to validate the robustness.

The strength of the genetic instruments was assessed by F statistics and indicates weak instruments when F statistics < 10. Cochrane’s Q statistics for IVW and the global test for MR-PRESSO were calculated to evaluate the heterogeneity between the instruments.

Role of the funding source

The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

All MR analyses were conducted with the package “TwoSampleMR”, “MendelianRandomization”, “MVMR”, “MRPRESSO”, and “RadialMR” in R software (version 4.2.2). To control for multiple testing, a two-sided P value that passed the Bonferroni corrected P value was defined as statistically significant, but P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for the effect of SGLT2 inhibition on T2DM and AF since the outcome T2DM was not the primary outcome in the present study.

Results

Effect of SGLT2 inhibition on AF and T2DM

In total, 10 independent single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected as genetic instruments for SGLT2 inhibition and the F statistics for all SNPs were greater than 16 (Supplementary Table 2). In MR analysis, we found that SGLT2 inhibition was associated with reduced risk of T2DM (odds ratio [OR] = 0.63 [95% CI 0.45, 0.88], P = 0.006) and AF (0.51 [0.27, 0.97], P = 0.039), for per 1 SD lowering of HbA1c via SGLT2 inhibition (Table 1). These results were supported by the sensitivity analysis of MR-PRESSO. There was no heterogeneity between instruments for the effect of SGLT2 inhibition on T2DM and AF (Q = 7.010, P = 0.536; Q = 1.780, P = 0.994), and no horizontal pleiotropy was detected (Egger intercept = 0.026, P = 0.115; Egger intercept = 0.012, P = 0.680).

Table 1.

MR estimates of the effect of SGLT2 inhibition on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and atrial fibrillation (AF)

Outcome Method OR (95% CI) P Q statistic P-heterogeneity Egger intercept P-intercept
T2DM IVW 0.63 (0.45, 0.88) 0.006 7.010 0.536
MR-Egger 4.11 (0.52, 32.76) 0.224 3.773 0.806 0.026 0.115
Weighted median 0.67 (0.42, 1.04) 0.077
Simple mode 0.58 (0.25, 1.34) 0.238
Weighted mode 0.92 (0,45, 1.91) 0.836
MR-PRESSO 0.63 (0.46, 0.86) 0.019 9.311 0.552
AF IVW 0.51 (0.27, 0.97) 0.039 1.780 0.994
MR-Egger 1.24 (0.02, 77.44) 0.921 1.596 0.991 0.012 0.680
Weighted median 0.57 (0.26, 1.22) 0.148
Simple mode 0.55 (0.17, 1.76) 0.342
Weighted mode 0.59 (0.21, 1.70) 0.355
MR-PRESSO 0.51 (0.38, 0.68) 0.001 2.121 0.996
Open in a new tab

Odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI), and P values were calculated for the respective method of MR analysis. The heterogeneity test in the IVW methods was performed using Cochran’s Q statistic and the global test for the MR-PRESSO method. P < 0.05 was considered significant

IVW, inverse–variance weighted; P-heterogeneity, P value for heterogeneity test; P-intercept, P value for the intercept of MR-Egger regression

Mediation MR of SGLT2 inhibition, circulating metabolites, and AF

We estimated the effect of SGLT2 inhibition on the 168 circulating metabolites and observed 20 metabolites were significantly associated with SGLT2 inhibition (Bonferroni-corrected P value threshold = 2.98 × 10− 4 [0.05/168]) (Supplementary Table 3, Fig. 2a). For compounds, we observed that SGLT2 inhibition increased the total concentration of lipoprotein particles (𝞫= 0.42 [95% CI 0.22, 0.61], P = 2.23 × 10−5). For lipoprotein particles, we found that SGLT2 inhibition increased the concentration of HDL particles especially small HDL (0.43 [0.23, 0.62], P = 1.37 × 10−5 and 0.64 [0.43, 0.84], P = 9.44 × 10−10, respectively) but decreased the concentration of very large HDL particles (-0.49 [-0.73, -0.25], P = 6.35 × 10−5).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

The forest plot of showing the effects of SGLT2 inhibition on circulating metabolites and the effects of metabolites on atrial fibrillation. (a) The effects of SGLT2 inhibition on the remaining 20 circulating metabolites selected from 168 metabolites, which were significantly associated with SGLT2 inhibition (Bonferroni-corrected P value threshold = 2.98 × 10− 4 [0.05/168]). (b) The effects of the above 20 metabolites on atrial fibrillation (Bonferroni-corrected P value threshold = 0.0025 [0.05/20]) CI, confidence interval; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; OR, odds ratio

We further estimated the effect of the 20 circulating metabolites that were significantly associated with SGLT2 inhibition on AF and found that two metabolites were significantly associated with AF (Bonferroni-corrected P value threshold = 0.0025 [0.05/20]) (Supplementary Table 4, Fig. 2b). For the total concentration of lipoprotein particles, we observed a negative association with AF (OR 0.88 [95% CI 0.81, 0.96], P = 0.002). For the concentration of HDL particles, we also observed a negative association with AF (0.88 [0.82, 0.96], P = 0.002). These results were supported by the MR-PRESSO method. There was no evidence of heterogeneity (Q = 58.332, P = 0.573; Q = 65.320, P = 0.603) and no horizontal pleiotropy (Egger intercept = -0.004, P = 0.351; Egger intercept = -0.002, P = 0.623). The genetic variants for the 20 metabolites were all strong (F statistics > 23) (Supplementary Data 1–20 are available at 10.6084/m9.figshare.23731140).

We observed an indirect effect of SGLT2 inhibition on AF through the total concentration of lipoprotein particles (OR 0.88 [95% CI 0.81, 0.96], P = 0.004) (Bonferroni-corrected P value threshold = 0.025 [0.05/2]), with a mediated proportion of 8.03% (95% CI [1.20%, 14.34%], P = 0.010) of the total effect (Table 2; Fig. 3). The indirect effect of SGLT2 inhibition on AF through the concentration of HDL particles (OR 0.89 [95% CI 0.82, 0.97], P = 0.005) had a mediated proportion of 7.59% (95% CI [1.09%, 13.34%], P = 0.011). There was no evidence of heterogeneity and no horizontal pleiotropy in these associations.

Table 2.

Multivariable MR estimates of the effect of circulating metabolites on atrial fibrillation after adjusting for SGLT2 inhibition

Circulating metabolites Method OR (95% CI) P Q statistic P-heterogeneity Egger intercept P-intercept
Compounds
Total concentration of lipoprotein particles MV-IVW 0.88 (0.81, 0.96) 0.004 62.175 0.676
MVMR-Egger 0.89 (0.82, 0.98) 0.012 62.283 0.673 0 0.928
Lipoprotein particles
Concentration of HDL particles MV-IVW 0.89 (0.82, 0.97) 0.005 67.790 0.738
MVMR-Egger 1.20 (0.83, 1.73) 0.468 66.669 0.769 -0.004 0.250
Open in a new tab

Odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI), and P values were calculated for the respective method of MR analysis. The heterogeneity test in the IVW methods was performed using Cochran’s Q statistic. P < 0.025 was considered significant

HDL, high-density lipoprotein. MV-IVW, multivariable inverse–variance weighted; MVMR-Egger, multivariable MR-Egger; P-heterogeneity, P value for heterogeneity test; P-intercept, P value for the intercept of MR-Egger regression

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

The potential causal evidence summarized from the MR analysis HDL, high-density lipoprotein

Discussion

Principal findings

In the present study, we evaluated the associations between genetically predicted SGLT2 inhibition and T2DM and AF. Furthermore, we investigated the mediating role of circulating metabolites in the association between SGLT2 inhibition and AF. Our study indicated that genetic variation in SGLT2 inhibition targets was associated with a lower risk of T2DM (OR 0.63 [95% CI 0.45, 0.88], P = 0.006, per 1 SD decrement in HbA1c) and AF (0.51 [0.27, 0.97], P = 0.039). The total concentration of lipoprotein particles might mediate 8% of the effect of SGLT2 inhibition on AF, particularly with the concentration of HDL particles mediating 7.6%.

The association between SGLT2 inhibition and AF

Large clinical trials and meta-analyses have investigated the role of SGLT2 inhibition in incident AF, but the results remain controversial. In the DECLARE-TIMI 58 trial, Dapagliflozin decreased the incidence of AF by 19% (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.81 [95% CI 0.68, 0.95]) in patients with T2DM. [6] However, there was no consistent reduction in incident AF in other randomized clinical trials. [7, 43] In the CANVAS trial, canagliflozin failed to decrease the risk of AF compared with placebo (0.84 [0.64, 1.12]) in T2DM patients. [43] Meta-analyses implied either no effect [8, 44] or possible protective effects [9, 45–49] of SGLT2 against AF. Of note, incident AF was reported as an adverse event rather than a prespecified end point and there were relatively limited AF events in previous randomized clinical trials, which influenced the robustness of the result. [50, 51] Furthermore, previous studies typically focused on patients with diabetes, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease and the protective effect of a certain SGLT2 inhibitor. It remains unclear whether these protective effects could extend to the general population and class of SGLT2 inhibition. [52, 53] Our study provided strong evidence of the protective effect of SGLT2 inhibition on AF in the general population by using a set of robust genetic instruments of SGLT2 as the instrument variables and a large GWAS for AF. Several possible mechanisms have been proposed for the protection against AF by SGLT2 inhibitors, including the modulation of risk factors and off-target actions on cardiomyocytes. [53] The former involves glucose control, weight loss, and reduction in blood pressure. [53] The latter refers to the inhibition effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on sodium-hydrogen exchanger (NHE) activity on cardiomyocytes, which interrupts the increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration and reduces the risk of AF. [53, 54].

The association between SGLT2 inhibition and circulating metabolites

The effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on blood lipids are conflicting in previous studies. [55, 56] A retrospective study by Calapkulu et al. showed that six months of dapagliflozin treatment in T2DM patients decreased total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, and triglyceride (TG) levels. [16] However, a meta-analysis of 48 randomized controlled trials demonstrated that SGLT2 inhibitors significantly increased total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, non-HDL-cholesterol, and HDL-cholesterol, and decreased TG levels in patients with T2DM. [15] In addition, some studies indicated no significant change in the lipid profile following SGLT2 administration. [17, 57, 58] A clinical trial on patients with T2DM performed by Bosch et al. revealed that empagliflozin had no significant effect on total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and LDL-cholesterol levels. [58] Inconsistencies in these studies might be related to small sample sizes, retrospective design, potential residual confounding, or short follow-up. [59] More importantly, several studies aimed at investigating the impact of SGLT2 inhibitors on lipoprotein subclasses showed that dapagliflozin treatment for three months did not alter concentrations of LDL-cholesterol, but with a remodeling of LDL particles. [60] Highly atherogenic small dense LDL decreased by 20% and less atherogenic large buoyant LDL-cholesterol increased by 18%. Nevertheless, another randomized trial found that empagliflozin after three months of treatment in patients with T2DM increased total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, LDL phospholipids, LDL apolipoprotein B and free fatty acids, but had no effect on LDL particles size. [61] These findings highlighted the importance of distinguishing lipoprotein subclass by size and lipoprotein composition in exploring the effect of SGLT2 inhibition on lipid metabolism.

In our study, we provided insights into the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on lipid metabolism by using a set of robust genetic variants of SGLT2 as the instruments and the largest circulating metabolites GWAS to date, which mainly covered blood lipids and lipoprotein particles sub-fractions. [30] We observed that SGLT2 inhibition had a significant effect on HDL subclass metabolism. SGLT2 inhibition significantly increased concentration of HDL especially small HDL but decreased levels of very large HDL. For the subclass of lipoprotein composition, we found that SGLT2 inhibition increased cholesterol, esterified cholesterol, free cholesterol, phospholipids, and total lipids levels in small HDL, but decreased these components in very large HDL (Fig. 2a). A randomized clinical trial by Fadini also found that small HDL subfraction levels increased and large HDL subfraction levels decreased after three months of treatment with dapagliflozin, though without statistical significance. [17].

The mediation effect of circulating metabolites in the association between SGLT2 inhibition and AF

Our findings support that genetically predicted total concentration of lipoprotein particles and concentration of HDL particles were associated with AF, which were consistent with previous findings from one meta-analysis [24] and several cohort studies. [62, 63] The total concentration of lipoprotein particles and concentration of HDL particles might be involved in the association between SGLT2 inhibition and AF. Oxidative stress and chronic inflammation have been proposed to mediate the protective effect of SGLT2 inhibition on AF and previous evidence suggested HDL possesses anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. [52, 64, 65] Furthermore, low HDL is an important component in metabolic syndrome, which is associated with an increased risk of AF. [63, 66] Therefore, HDL might mediate this protective effect. Our study provided genetic evidence that HDL might mediate the protective effect of SGLT2 inhibition on AF. Nevertheless, it’s worth noting that the mediation association observed might not be causal and needs to be further validated through experimental studies.

Strengths and limitations

To our knowledge, this is the first study to use MR analysis to investigate the relationship between SGLT2 inhibition, circulating metabolites, and AF in the general population. Furthermore, we provided genetic evidence on the potential mechanism of SGLT2 inhibition exerting a beneficial effect on AF through the total concentration of lipoprotein particles, primarily HDL. Nevertheless, our study had several limitations. First, genetic variants mimicking SGLT2 inhibition reflect lifelong effects of SGLT2 inhibitors, and the magnitude of these effects might not accurately reflect the magnitude of short-term effects of SGLT2 inhibitors. [67] Hence, MR analysis is more helpful to examine the direction of the potential causal effect rather than quantifying its magnitude. However, the expected direction of effects can inform potential efficacy, which can be further explored in experiments and clinical trials. Second, there are overlapped samples of GWAS for SGLT2 inhibition and the circulating metabolites, the GWAS for Nightingale Health metabolites was conducted in around 24.2% of the UK Biobank. In the case of the weak instruments, sample overlap between exposure and outcome could bias the potential causal effect estimate by introducing associations between instruments and confounders. [68] However, the genetic variants for SGLT2 inhibition in this study were strongly associated with exposure indicated by high F-statistics (all > 16), which implied that our results were unlikely biased by weak instruments. Third, the lack of large public GWAS data for lipids and lipids subfractions like metabolic profiling by Nightingale Health limited further validation of our findings. [69] Finally, as this study was performed using data from individuals of European ancestry, the generalization of these results to other populations warrants further investigation.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study supported the association between genetically predicted SGLT2 inhibition, circulating metabolites, and AF. Specifically, the total concentration of lipoprotein particles, especially HDL particle concentration, mediated the protective effect of SGLT2 inhibition on AF. These findings provided genetic evidence for the mechanisms of SGLT2 inhibition in reducing AF risk and might inform future mechanistic and clinical studies.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (177.6KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants in all the GWASs used in this study and the investigators who made these GWAS data publicly available.

Abbreviations

AF

atrial fibrillation

GWAS

genome-wide association study

HbA1c

glycated hemoglobin

HDL

high-density lipoprotein

IVW

inverse variant weight

LDL

low-density lipoprotein

MR

Mendelian randomization

MVMR

multivariable Mendelian randomization

SGLT2

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 T2DM: type 2 diabetes mellitus

UVMR

univariable Mendelian randomization

Author contributions

N.W. and Y.L. conceived and designed the study. J.L. and Y.Y. performed the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. Y.S. and B.Y. participated in data collection. X.T. and B.W. critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (2022XD017), Innovative Research Team of High-level Local Universities in Shanghai (SHSMU-ZDCX20212501), Shanghai Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau (2020074), Clinical Research Plan of Shanghai Hospital Development Center (SHDC2020CR4006).

Data Availability

The GWAS Summary statistics used in this study were publicly accessed from the IEU OpenGWAS project (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/), the GTEx Portal (https://www.gtexportal.org/), the eQTLGen Consortium (https://eqtlgen.org/) and the DIAGRAM consortium (https://diagram-consortium.org/).

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Summary-level GWAS statistics used in this study is publicly available and no specific ethical approval was required.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Jiang Li and Yuefeng Yu contributed equally to this work.

References

  • 1.Heerspink HJ, Perkins BA, Fitchett DH, Husain M, Cherney DZ. Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in the treatment of Diabetes Mellitus: Cardiovascular and kidney effects, potential mechanisms, and clinical applications. Circulation. 2016;134(10):752–72. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bhatt DL, Szarek M, Pitt B, Cannon CP, Leiter LA, McGuire DK, et al. Sotagliflozin in patients with Diabetes and chronic Kidney Disease. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(2):129–39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2030186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cannon CP, Pratley R, Dagogo-Jack S, Mancuso J, Huyck S, Masiukiewicz U, et al. Cardiovascular outcomes with Ertugliflozin in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(15):1425–35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2004967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, de Zeeuw D, Fulcher G, Erondu N, et al. Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and renal events in type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(7):644–57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP, Mosenzon O, Kato ET, Cahn A, et al. Dapagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(4):347–57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zelniker TA, Bonaca MP, Furtado RHM, Mosenzon O, Kuder JF, Murphy SA, et al. Effect of Dapagliflozin on Atrial Fibrillation in patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: insights from the DECLARE-TIMI 58 Trial. Circulation. 2020;141(15):1227–34. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhou Z, Jardine MJ, Li Q, Neuen BL, Cannon CP, de Zeeuw D, et al. Effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation in Diabetic Kidney Disease: results from the CREDENCE Trial and Meta-Analysis. Stroke. 2021;52(5):1545–56. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ouyang X, Wang J, Chen Q, Peng L, Li S, Tang X. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor may not prevent atrial fibrillation in patients with Heart Failure: a systematic review. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023;22(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01860-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li HL, Lip GYH, Feng Q, Fei Y, Tse YK, Wu MZ, et al. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and cardiac arrhythmias: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021;20(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01293-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cowie MR, Fisher M. SGLT2 inhibitors: mechanisms of cardiovascular benefit beyond glycaemic control. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17(12):761–72. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-0406-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ferrannini E, Mark M, Mayoux E. CV Protection in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial: a thrifty substrate hypothesis. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(7):1108–14. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kappel BA, Lehrke M, Schütt K, Artati A, Adamski J, Lebherz C, et al. Effect of Empagliflozin on the metabolic signature of patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation. 2017;136(10):969–72. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Katano S, Yano T, Kouzu H, Nagaoka R, Numazawa R, Yamano K, et al. Elevated circulating level of β-aminoisobutyric acid (BAIBA) in Heart Failure patients with type 2 Diabetes receiving sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01727-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Szekeres Z, Toth K, Szabados E. The effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on lipid metabolism. Metabolites. 2021;11(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 15.Sánchez-García A, Simental-Mendía M, Millán-Alanís JM, Simental-Mendía LE. Effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors on lipid profile: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 48 randomized controlled trials. Pharmacol Res. 2020;160:105068. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Calapkulu M, Cander S, Gul OO, Ersoy C. Lipid profile in type 2 diabetic patients with new dapagliflozin treatment; actual clinical experience data of six months retrospective lipid profile from single center. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019;13(2):1031–4. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2019.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fadini GP, Bonora BM, Zatti G, Vitturi N, Iori E, Marescotti MC, et al. Effects of the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin on HDL cholesterol, particle size, and cholesterol efflux capacity in patients with type 2 Diabetes: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017;16(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0529-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Katsuyama H, Hamasaki H, Adachi H, Moriyama S, Kawaguchi A, Sako A, et al. Effects of Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on metabolic parameters in patients with type 2 Diabetes: a chart-based analysis. J Clin Med Res. 2016;8(3):237–43. doi: 10.14740/jocmr2467w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Emdin CA, Khera AV, Kathiresan S. Mendelian randomization. JAMA. 2017;318(19):1925–6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Burgess S, Timpson NJ, Ebrahim S, Davey Smith G. Mendelian randomization: where are we now and where are we going? Oxford University Press; 2015. pp. 379–88. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 21.Li Y, Gray A, Xue L, Farb MG, Ayalon N, Andersson C, et al. Metabolomic Profiles, Ideal Cardiovascular Health, and risk of Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation: insights from the Framingham Heart Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023;12(12):e028022. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Qin X, Zhang Y, Zheng Q. Metabolic inflexibility as a pathogenic basis for Atrial Fibrillation. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(15). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 23.Lu C, Liu C, Mei D, Yu M, Bai J, Bao X, et al. Comprehensive metabolomic characterization of atrial fibrillation. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:911845. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.911845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Guan B, Li X, Xue W, Tse G, Waleed KB, Liu Y, et al. Blood lipid profiles and risk of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Clin Lipidol. 2020;14(1):133–42e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2019.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Skrivankova VW, Richmond RC, Woolf BAR, Yarmolinsky J, Davies NM, Swanson SA, et al. Strengthening the reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology using mendelian randomization: the STROBE-MR Statement. JAMA. 2021;326(16):1614–21. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.18236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.The GTEx Consortium atlas of genetic regulatory effects across human tissues. Science. 2020;369(6509):1318–30. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz1776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Võsa U, Claringbould A, Westra HJ, Bonder MJ, Deelen P, Zeng B, et al. Large-scale cis- and trans-eQTL analyses identify thousands of genetic loci and polygenic scores that regulate blood gene expression. Nat Genet. 2021;53(9):1300–10. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00913-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zuber V, Grinberg NF, Gill D, Manipur I, Slob EAW, Patel A, et al. Combining evidence from mendelian randomization and colocalization: review and comparison of approaches. Am J Hum Genet. 2022;109(5):767–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bakker MK, van Straten T, Chong M, Paré G, Gill D, Ruigrok YM. Anti-epileptic drug target perturbation and intracranial Aneurysm risk: mendelian randomization and colocalization study. Stroke. 2023;54(1):208–16. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.040598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ritchie SC, Surendran P, Karthikeyan S, Lambert SA, Bolton T, Pennells L, et al. Quality control and removal of technical variation of NMR metabolic biomarker data in ~ 120,000 UK Biobank participants. Sci Data. 2023;10(1):64. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-01949-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Elsworth B, Lyon M, Alexander T, Liu Y, Matthews P, Hallett J, et al. The MRC IEU OpenGWAS data infrastructure. bioRxiv. 2020. 2020.08.10.244293.
  • 32.Christophersen IE, Rienstra M, Roselli C, Yin X, Geelhoed B, Barnard J, et al. Large-scale analyses of common and rare variants identify 12 new loci associated with atrial fibrillation. Nat Genet. 2017;49(6):946–52. doi: 10.1038/ng.3843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mahajan A, Spracklen CN, Zhang W, Ng MCY, Petty LE, Kitajima H, et al. Multi-ancestry genetic study of type 2 Diabetes highlights the power of diverse populations for discovery and translation. Nat Genet. 2022;54(5):560–72. doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01058-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Verbanck M, Chen CY, Neale B, Do R. Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from mendelian randomization between complex traits and Diseases. Nat Genet. 2018;50(5):693–8. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0099-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bowden J, Spiller W, Del Greco MF, Sheehan N, Thompson J, Minelli C, et al. Improving the visualization, interpretation and analysis of two-sample summary data mendelian randomization via the Radial plot and radial regression. Int J Epidemiol. 2018;47(4):1264–78. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lin Z, Deng Y, Pan W. Combining the strengths of inverse-variance weighting and Egger regression in mendelian randomization using a mixture of regressions model. PLoS Genet. 2021;17(11):e1009922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Burgess S, Davey Smith G, Davies NM, Dudbridge F, Gill D, Glymour MM, et al. Guidelines for performing mendelian randomization investigations. Wellcome Open Res. 2019;4:186. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15555.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods. 2002;7(1):83–104. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Burgess S. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(2):512–25. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Haycock PC, Burgess S. Consistent estimation in mendelian randomization with some Invalid instruments using a weighted median estimator. Genet Epidemiol. 2016;40(4):304–14. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zheng J, Baird D, Borges MC, Bowden J, Hemani G, Haycock P, et al. Recent developments in mendelian randomization studies. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2017;4(4):330–45. doi: 10.1007/s40471-017-0128-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hartwig FP, Davey Smith G, Bowden J. Robust inference in summary data mendelian randomization via the zero modal pleiotropy assumption. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(6):1985–98. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhou Z, Lindley RI, Rådholm K, Jenkins B, Watson J, Perkovic V, et al. Canagliflozin and Stroke in type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Stroke. 2019;50(2):396–404. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Usman MS, Siddiqi TJ, Memon MM, Khan MS, Rawasia WF, Talha Ayub M, et al. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018;25(5):495–502. doi: 10.1177/2047487318755531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Fatima K, Suri A, Rija A, Kalim S, Javaid S, Arif Z et al. The effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors on Stroke and atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022:101582. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 46.Li WJ, Chen XQ, Xu LL, Li YQ, Luo BH. SGLT2 inhibitors and atrial fibrillation in type 2 Diabetes: a systematic review with meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020;19(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01105-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Li D, Liu Y, Hidru TH, Yang X, Wang Y, Chen C, et al. Protective effects of Sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors on Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter: a systematic review and Meta- analysis of Randomized Placebo-controlled trials. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021;12:619586. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.619586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sfairopoulos D, Liu T, Zhang N, Tse G, Bazoukis G, Letsas K, et al. Association between sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and incident atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter in Heart Failure patients with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Heart Fail Rev. 2023;28(4):925–36. doi: 10.1007/s10741-022-10281-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Li W, Chen X, Xie X, Xu M, Xu L, Liu P, et al. Comparison of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists for Atrial Fibrillation in type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: systematic review with Network Meta-analysis of Randomized controlled trials. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2022;79(3):281–8. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000001197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhuo M, D’Andrea E, Paik JM, Wexler DJ, Everett BM, Glynn RJ, et al. Association of Sodium-glucose Cotransporter-2 inhibitors with Incident Atrial Fibrillation in older adults with type 2 Diabetes. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(10):e2235995. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.35995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hsiao FC, Yen KC, Chao TF, Chen SW, Chan YH, Chu PH. New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in patients with type 2 Diabetes treated with novel glucose-lowering therapies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107(9):2493–9. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Karamichalakis N, Kolovos V, Paraskevaidis I, Tsougos E. A New Hope: sodium-glucose Cotransporter-2 inhibition to prevent Atrial Fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022;9(8). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 53.Shetty SS, Krumerman A. Putative protective effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on atrial fibrillation through risk factor modulation and off-target actions: potential mechanisms and future directions. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01552-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Peng X, Li L, Zhang M, Zhao Q, Wu K, Bai R, et al. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors potentially prevent Atrial Fibrillation by ameliorating Ion Handling and mitochondrial dysfunction. Front Physiol. 2020;11:912. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Piccirillo F, Mastroberardino S, Nusca A, Frau L, Guarino L, Napoli N et al. Novel antidiabetic agents and their effects on lipid Profile: a single shot for several Cardiovascular targets. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(12). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 56.Yaribeygi H, Maleki M, Reiner Ž, Jamialahmadi T, Sahebkar A. Mechanistic view on the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on lipid metabolism in Diabetic Milieu. J Clin Med. 2022;11:21. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ejiri K, Miyoshi T, Kihara H, Hata Y, Nagano T, Takaishi A, et al. Effects of luseogliflozin and voglibose on high-risk lipid profiles and inflammatory markers in Diabetes patients with Heart Failure. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):15449. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19371-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Bosch A, Ott C, Jung S, Striepe K, Karg MV, Kannenkeril D, et al. How does empagliflozin improve arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus? Sub analysis of a clinical trial. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019;18(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0839-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Osto E, Bonacina F, Pirillo A, Norata GD. Neutral effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on lipoprotein metabolism: from clinical evidence to molecular mechanisms. Pharmacol Res. 2023;188:106667. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hayashi T, Fukui T, Nakanishi N, Yamamoto S, Tomoyasu M, Osamura A, et al. Dapagliflozin decreases small dense low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and increases high-density lipoprotein 2-cholesterol in patients with type 2 Diabetes: comparison with sitagliptin. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017;16(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12933-016-0491-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Rau M, Thiele K, Korbinian Hartmann NU, Möllmann J, Wied S, Böhm M, et al. Effects of empagliflozin on lipoprotein subfractions in patients with type 2 Diabetes: data from a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Atherosclerosis. 2021;330:8–13. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.06.915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Harrison SL, Lane DA, Banach M, Mastej M, Kasperczyk S, Jóźwiak JJ, et al. Lipid levels, atrial fibrillation and the impact of age: results from the LIPIDOGRAM2015 study. Atherosclerosis. 2020;312:16–22. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2020.08.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ding M, Wennberg A, Gigante B, Walldius G, Hammar N, Modig K. Lipid levels in midlife and risk of atrial fibrillation over 3 decades-experience from the Swedish AMORIS cohort: a cohort study. PLoS Med. 2022;19(8):e1004044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Yang KC, Dudley SC., Jr Oxidative stress and atrial fibrillation: finding a missing piece to the puzzle. Circulation. 2013;128(16):1724–6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Welty FK. How do elevated triglycerides and low HDL-cholesterol affect inflammation and atherothrombosis? Curr Cardiol Rep. 2013;15(9):400. doi: 10.1007/s11886-013-0400-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lind V, Hammar N, Lundman P, Friberg L, Talbäck M, Walldius G, et al. Impaired fasting glucose: a risk factor for atrial fibrillation and Heart Failure. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021;20(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01422-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Holmes MV, Richardson TG, Ference BA, Davies NM, Davey Smith G. Integrating genomics with biomarkers and therapeutic targets to invigorate cardiovascular drug development. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18(6):435–53. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-00493-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Burgess S, Davies NM, Thompson SG. Bias due to participant overlap in two-sample mendelian randomization. Genet Epidemiol. 2016;40(7):597–608. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Julkunen H, Cichońska A, Tiainen M, Koskela H, Nybo K, Mäkelä V, et al. Atlas of plasma NMR biomarkers for health and Disease in 118,461 individuals from the UK Biobank. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):604. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36231-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1 (177.6KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The GWAS Summary statistics used in this study were publicly accessed from the IEU OpenGWAS project (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/), the GTEx Portal (https://www.gtexportal.org/), the eQTLGen Consortium (https://eqtlgen.org/) and the DIAGRAM consortium (https://diagram-consortium.org/).

Articles from Cardiovascular Diabetology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES