Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability of self reports of smoking during pregnancy. METHODS: Residual sera from early and late antenatal blood samples were tested for cotinine for all pregnancies over a six month period. Over an overlapping 12 month period, a postal questionnaire on smoking was also sent to all new mothers (n = 4857) when their baby was 4-8 weeks old. Smoking status from obstetric booking notes was also obtained. RESULTS: The cotinine-validated smoking prevalence was 31.3% for the first trimester and 27.7% for the third trimester. Questionnaire self reported prevalences were 19.2% and 15.7% for the first and third trimesters respectively, and 18.9% for obstetric booking. Of cotinine-validated smokers, 22% denied smoking-self deceivers. Of mothers who replied to the questionnaire, a half appeared to systematically under report the amount they smoked. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly a quarter of smoking pregnant women did not report smoking. Moreover, of those who did, the amount smoked was often under reported. This tendency to under report may rise as pressures to stop smoking increase. Accurate measures of smoking prevalence in pregnant women will require objective testing.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bardy A. H., Seppälä T., Lillsunde P., Koskela P., Gref C. G. Objectively measured tobacco exposure among pregnant women in Finland in 1986 and 1990. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994 Jan;73(1):30–34. doi: 10.3109/00016349409013389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cummings S. R., Richard R. J. Optimum cutoff points for biochemical validation of smoking status. Am J Public Health. 1988 May;78(5):574–575. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.5.574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haley N. J., Axelrad C. M., Tilton K. A. Validation of self-reported smoking behavior: biochemical analyses of cotinine and thiocyanate. Am J Public Health. 1983 Oct;73(10):1204–1207. doi: 10.2105/ajph.73.10.1204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jarvis M. J., Tunstall-Pedoe H., Feyerabend C., Vesey C., Saloojee Y. Comparison of tests used to distinguish smokers from nonsmokers. Am J Public Health. 1987 Nov;77(11):1435–1438. doi: 10.2105/ajph.77.11.1435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kendrick J. S., Zahniser S. C., Miller N., Salas N., Stine J., Gargiullo P. M., Floyd R. L., Spierto F. W., Sexton M., Metzger R. W. Integrating smoking cessation into routine public prenatal care: the Smoking Cessation in Pregnancy project. Am J Public Health. 1995 Feb;85(2):217–222. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.2.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kornitzer M., Vanhemeldonck A., Bourdoux P., de Backer G. Belgian heart disease prevention project: comparison of self-reported smoking behaviour with serum thiocyanate concentrations. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1983 Jun;37(2):132–136. doi: 10.1136/jech.37.2.132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sillett R. W., Wilson M. B., Malcolm R. E., Ball K. P. Deception among smokers. Br Med J. 1978 Oct 28;2(6146):1185–1186. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6146.1185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]