Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
. 1991 Mar;45(1):59–64. doi: 10.1136/jech.45.1.59

Factors associated with non-participation of women in a breast cancer screening programme in a town in northern Italy.

F Donato 1, A Bollani 1, R Spiazzi 1, M Soldo 1, L Pasquale 1, S Monarca 1, L Lucini 1, G Nardi 1
PMCID: PMC1060703  PMID: 2045747

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE--The aim was to investigate the reasons for the high percentage of women refusing to attend a breast cancer screening programme in the Health District of Brescia, Italy. DESIGN--This was a survey of a sample of non-attenders to the programme, who were interviewed using a structured questionnaire. SETTING--Non-attenders all lived in a central area of the town near the screening centre. PARTICIPANTS--Of the 612 non-attenders eligible for interview, 183 could not be interviewed: one had died, 86 were away from home at two different visits, 32 were no longer resident at the known address, eight had serious health problems, 17 had undergone mastectomy, and 39 refused the interview. Overall, a total of 429 of the 612 eligible women were interviewed (70.1%). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS--Attenders and non-attenders were compared with respect to demographic and socioeconomic factors, use of preventive medicine, and prevalence of risk factors for breast cancer. The response was higher among less educated women, married and widowed women, and those born in the province than among more educated, single or divorced, and immigrant women. Most of the women interviewed gave practical reasons for non-participation, but lack of interest/distrust and fear/worry/anxiety also seemed important. The number of non-attenders who had had a Papanicolaou test within the previous three years was three times higher than those who had had mammography, suggesting that non-attenders were more interested in types of preventive medicine other than screening for breast cancer by mammography. Attenders and non-attenders appeared similar as regards distribution of conventional breast cancer risk factors. CONCLUSIONS--Greater effort in the information campaign might increase the participation rate in screening for breast cancer, although to a lesser extent than expected: if non-attenders potentially recruitable in our screening were added to attenders, overall compliance of the programme was about 75%, lower than that observed in some programmes in northern Europe.

Full text

PDF
60

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Albanes D., Weinberg G. B., Boss L., Taylor P. R. A survey of physicians' breast cancer early detection practices. Prev Med. 1988 Sep;17(5):643–652. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(88)90057-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alghisi A., Donato F., Lucini L., Marcianò P., Miccichè C., Nardi G., Nardi M. E., Pasini M., Spiazzi R. Breast cancer screening in an urban population in northern Italy. Tumori. 1990 Feb 28;76(1):22–25. doi: 10.1177/030089169007600105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Andersson I., Aspegren K., Janzon L., Landberg T., Lindholm K., Linell F., Ljungberg O., Ranstam J., Sigfússon B. Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial. BMJ. 1988 Oct 15;297(6654):943–948. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6654.943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bassett L. W., Bunnell D. H., Cerny J. A., Gold R. H. Screening mammography: referral practices of Los Angeles physicians. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986 Oct;147(4):689–692. doi: 10.2214/ajr.147.4.689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Berrino F., Chiappa L., Oliverio S., Todeschin P., Turolla E., Vegetti P. Study of women who did not respond to screening for cervical cancer. Tumori. 1979 Apr 30;65(2):143–155. doi: 10.1177/030089167906500202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Calnan M. Explaining participation in programmes for the early detection of breast cancer. Community Med. 1984 Aug;6(3):204–209. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a043713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Collette H. J., Day N. E., Rombach J. J., de Waard F. Evaluation of screening for breast cancer in a non-randomised study (the DOM project) by means of a case-control study. Lancet. 1984 Jun 2;1(8388):1224–1226. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)91704-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Day N. E., Baines C. J., Chamberlain J., Hakama M., Miller A. B., Prorok P. UICC project on screening for cancer: report of the workshop on screening for breast cancer. Meeting held in Helsinki, Finland, on April 7-9, 1986. Int J Cancer. 1986 Sep 15;38(3):303–308. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910380302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Day N. E., Williams D. R., Khaw K. T. Breast cancer screening programmes: the development of a monitoring and evaluation system. Br J Cancer. 1989 Jun;59(6):954–958. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1989.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ferraroni M., La Vecchia C., Pagano R., Negri E., Parazzini F., Decarli A. Pattern of cervical screening utilization in Italy. Tumori. 1989 Oct 31;75(5):420–422. doi: 10.1177/030089168907500504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fox S. A., Klos D. S., Tsou C. V. Underuse of screening mammography by family physicians. Radiology. 1988 Feb;166(2):431–433. doi: 10.1148/radiology.166.2.3336718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. French K., Porter A. M., Robinson S. E., McCallum F. M., Howie J. G., Roberts M. M. Attendance at a breast screening clinic: a problem of administration or attitudes. 1982 Aug 28-Sep 4Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 285(6342):617–620. doi: 10.1136/bmj.285.6342.617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Frisell J., Glas U., Hellström L., Somell A. Randomized mammographic screening for breast cancer in Stockholm. Design, first round results and comparisons. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1986;8(1):45–54. doi: 10.1007/BF01805924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hobbs P., Smith A., George W. D., Sellwood R. A. Acceptors and rejectors of an invitation to undergo breast screening compared with those who referred themselves. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1980 Mar;34(1):19–22. doi: 10.1136/jech.34.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kelsey J. L. A review of the epidemiology of human breast cancer. Epidemiol Rev. 1979;1:74–109. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lundgren B. Population screening for breast cancer by single-view mammography in a geographic region in Sweden. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1979 Jun;62(6):1373–1379. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Maclean U., Sinfield D., Klein S., Harnden B. Women who decline breast screening. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1984 Dec;38(4):278–283. doi: 10.1136/jech.38.4.278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Palli D., Del Turco M. R., Buiatti E., Carli S., Ciatto S., Toscani L., Maltoni G. A case-control study of the efficacy of a non-randomized breast cancer screening program in Florence (Italy). Int J Cancer. 1986 Oct 15;38(4):501–504. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910380408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rutledge D. N., Hartmann W. H., Kinman P. O., Winfield A. C. Exploration of factors affecting mammography behaviors. Prev Med. 1988 Jul;17(4):412–422. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(88)90040-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shapiro S., Venet W., Strax P., Venet L., Roeser R. Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1982 Aug;69(2):349–355. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tabar L., Fagerberg G., Duffy S. W., Day N. E. The Swedish two county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer: recent results and calculation of benefit. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1989 Jun;43(2):107–114. doi: 10.1136/jech.43.2.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Verbeek A. L., Hendriks J. H., Holland R., Mravunac M., Sturmans F., Day N. E. Reduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography. First results of the Nijmegen project, 1975-1981. Lancet. 1984 Jun 2;1(8388):1222–1224. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)91703-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. de Waard F., Collette H. J., Rombach J. J., Baanders-van Halewijn E. A., Honing C. The DOM project for the early detection of breast cancer, Utrecht, The Netherlands. J Chronic Dis. 1984;37(1):1–44. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(84)90123-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES