Skip to main content
Epidemiology and Community Health logoLink to Epidemiology and Community Health
. 1979 Mar;33(1):84–90. doi: 10.1136/jech.33.1.84

The influence of a premarital conception and various obstetric complications on subsequent prenatal health behaviour.

J B McKinlay, S M McKinlay
PMCID: PMC1060909  PMID: 467402

Abstract

This paper is a companion to an earlier report on prenatal visiting patterns in Aberdeen, Scotland (McKinlay, 1970). It examines the following three main questions: (1) Is the emerging trend towards later maternity care among young nulliparae largely due to those who delay because of premarital conception? (2) If premarital conception is primarily responsible for this trend, is this pattern of visiting behaviour continued in subsequent pregnancies, and what variation is there in such behaviour--between, for example, different socioeconomic groups and age groups? (3) Does the presence of one or more obstetric complications associated with a first pregnancy or birth have an effect on subsequent prenatal health behaviour, and does this effect, if present, interact with, say, socioeconomic status, or the legal status of the first pregnancy? The paper concludes with a discussion of some policy implications of the findings.

Full text

PDF
89

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BAIRD D., ILLSLEY R. Environment and childbearing. Proc R Soc Med. 1953 Feb;46(2):53–59. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BAIRD D. Preventive medicine in obstetrics. N Engl J Med. 1952 Apr 10;246(15):561–568. doi: 10.1056/NEJM195204102461501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BAIRD D., THOMSON A. M., DUNCAN E. H. L. The causes and prevention of stillbirths and first week deaths. II. Evidence from Aberdeen clinical records. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1953 Feb;60(1):17–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1953.tb06407.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gill D. G., Illsley R., Koplik L. H. Pregnancy in teenage girls. Soc Sci Med. 1970 Apr;3(4):549–574. doi: 10.1016/0037-7856(70)90026-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McKinlay J. B. The new late comers for antenatal care. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1970 Feb;24(1):52–57. doi: 10.1136/jech.24.1.52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Tokuhata G. K., Digon E., Mann L. Prenatal care and obstetric abnormalities. Experiences of 185,000 Pennsylvania births. J Chronic Dis. 1973 Mar;26(3):163–185. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(73)90088-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. YANKAUER A., GOSS K. G., ROMEO S. M. An evaluation of prenatal care and its relationship to social class and social disorganization. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1953 Aug;43(8):1001–1010. doi: 10.2105/ajph.43.8.1001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Epidemiology and Community Health are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES