Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1990 Mar;92(3):733–739. doi: 10.1104/pp.92.3.733

Correlation between the Maintenance of Photosynthesis and in Situ Protoplast Volume at Low Water Potentials in Droughted Wheat 1

Mane Santakumari 1, Gerald A Berkowitz 1
PMCID: PMC1062361  PMID: 16667342

Abstract

Studies were undertaken to examine the relationship between water deficit effects on photosynthesis and the extent of protoplast volume reduction which occurs in leaves at low water potential (Ψw). This relationship was monitored in two cultivars (`Condor' and `Capelle Desprez') of cultivated wheat (Triticum aestivum) that differed in sensitivity to drought, and in a wild relative of cultivated wheat (Triticum kotschyi) that has been previously found to be `drought resistant.' When subjected to periods of water stress, Condor and T. kotschyi plants underwent osmotic adjustment; Capelle plants did not. Photosynthetic capacity was maintained to different extents in the three genotypes as leaf Ψw declined during stress; Capelle plants were most severely affected. Calculations of internal leaf [CO2] and stomatal conductance from gas exchange measurements indicated that differences in photosynthetic inhibition at low Ψw among the genotypes were primarily due to nonstomatal effects. The extent of protoplast volume reduction that occurred in leaves at low Ψw was also found to be different in the three genotypes; maintenance of protoplast volume and photosynthetic capacity in stressed plants of the genotypes appeared to be correlated. When the extent of water stress-induced inhibition of photosynthesis was plotted as a function of declining protoplast volume, this relationship appeared identical for the three genotypes. It was concluded that there is a correlative association between protoplast volume and photosynthetic capacity in leaves of wheat plants subjected to periods of water stress.

Full text

PDF
734

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berkowitz G. A., Gibbs M. Reduced osmotic potential inhibition of photosynthesis : site-specific effects of osmotically induced stromal acidification. Plant Physiol. 1983 Aug;72(4):1100–1109. doi: 10.1104/pp.72.4.1100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gupta A. S., Berkowitz G. A. Chloroplast osmotic adjustment and water stress effects on photosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 1988 Sep;88(1):200–206. doi: 10.1104/pp.88.1.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gupta A. S., Berkowitz G. A. Osmotic adjustment, symplast volume, and nonstomatally mediated water stress inhibition of photosynthesis in wheat. Plant Physiol. 1987 Dec;85(4):1040–1047. doi: 10.1104/pp.85.4.1040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gupta A. S., Berkowitz G. A., Pier P. A. Maintenance of photosynthesis at low leaf water potential in wheat : role of potassium status and irrigation history. Plant Physiol. 1989 Apr;89(4):1358–1365. doi: 10.1104/pp.89.4.1358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Johnson R. C., Mornhinweg D. W., Ferris D. M., Heitholt J. J. Leaf photosynthesis and conductance of selected triticum species at different water potentials. Plant Physiol. 1987 Apr;83(4):1014–1017. doi: 10.1104/pp.83.4.1014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Matthews M. A., Boyer J. S. Acclimation of photosynthesis to low leaf water potentials. Plant Physiol. 1984 Jan;74(1):161–166. doi: 10.1104/pp.74.1.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pier P. A., Berkowitz G. A. Modulation of water stress effects on photosynthesis by altered leaf k. Plant Physiol. 1987 Nov;85(3):655–661. doi: 10.1104/pp.85.3.655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Robinson S. P. Osmotic adjustment by intact isolated chloroplasts in response to osmotic stress and its effect on photosynthesis and chloroplast volume. Plant Physiol. 1985 Dec;79(4):996–1002. doi: 10.1104/pp.79.4.996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Santakumari M., Berkowitz G. A. Protoplast volume:water potential relationship and bound water fraction in spinach leaves. Plant Physiol. 1989 Sep;91(1):13–18. doi: 10.1104/pp.91.1.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sharkey T. D., Seemann J. R. Mild water stress effects on carbon-reduction-cycle intermediates, ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase activity, and spatial homogeneity of photosynthesis in intact leaves. Plant Physiol. 1989 Apr;89(4):1060–1065. doi: 10.1104/pp.89.4.1060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES