Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1990 Jul;93(3):1071–1077. doi: 10.1104/pp.93.3.1071

Boron Deficiency in Cultured Pine Cells 1

Quantitative Studies of the Interaction with Ca and Mg

Robert Dixon Teasdale 1, Dianne Katherine Richards 1,2
PMCID: PMC1062632  PMID: 16667559

Abstract

A pronounced interaction between calcium, magnesium, and boron was found in growth studies with Pinus radiata cell cultures. Quantitative isoactivity data for the interaction was analyzed in terms of selected simple and plausible theoretical models. The data was found to be consistent with a model in which a critical acceptor molecule is activated only by binding both Ca and B at separate sites; Mg competitively displaces Ca to inactivate the acceptor. It was found that B is, surprisingly, not bound strongly (Kdiss = 450 ± 80 micromolar) and that the affinity for Ca is two orders of magnitude stronger than for Mg. Therefore only a small proportion of the acceptor will be boronated under natural conditions. Moderate levels of mannitol were found to aggravate B deficiency due to its effective removal by direct chemical complexation. At higher concentrations of mannitol (or other sugars), where osmotic contribution is significant, little B was needed to overcome growth inhibition—a result consistent with B having a primary role in cell wall biosynthesis.

Full text

PDF
1074

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Birnbaum E. H., Dugger W. M., Beasley B. C. Interaction of boron with components of nucleic Acid metabolism in cotton ovules cultured in vitro. Plant Physiol. 1977 Jun;59(6):1034–1038. doi: 10.1104/pp.59.6.1034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dugger W. M., Palmer R. L. Effect of Boron on the Incorporation of Glucose from UDP-Glucose into Cotton Fibers Grown in Vitro. Plant Physiol. 1980 Feb;65(2):266–273. doi: 10.1104/pp.65.2.266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Krueger R. W., Lovatt C. J., Albert L. S. Metabolic Requirement of Cucurbita pepo for Boron. Plant Physiol. 1987 Feb;83(2):254–258. doi: 10.1104/pp.83.2.254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sentenac H., Grignon C. A model for predicting ionic equilibrium concentrations in cell walls. Plant Physiol. 1981 Aug;68(2):415–419. doi: 10.1104/pp.68.2.415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Teasdale R. D., Dawson P. A., Woolhouse H. W. Mineral Nutrient Requirements of a Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda) Cell Suspension Culture : Evaluation of a Medium Formulated from Seed Composition Data. Plant Physiol. 1986 Dec;82(4):942–945. doi: 10.1104/pp.82.4.942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES