Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

bioRxiv logoLink to bioRxiv
[Preprint]. 2023 Oct 23:2023.10.19.563208. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2023.10.19.563208

Expression of Lanthipeptides in Human Cells

Sara M Eslami 1, Imran R Rahman 2, Wilfred A van der Donk 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC10634679  PMID: 37961259

Abstract

Cyclic peptides represent a burgeoning area of interest in therapeutic and biotechnological research. In opposition to their linear counterparts, cyclic peptides, such as certain ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs), are more conformationally constrained and less susceptible to proteolytic degradation. The lanthipeptide RiPP cytolysin L forms a covalently enforced helical structure that may be used to disrupt helical interactions at protein-protein interfaces. Herein, an expression system is reported to produce lanthipeptides and structurally diverse cytolysin L derivatives in mammalian cells. Successful targeting of lanthipeptides to the nucleus is demonstrated. In vivo expression and targeting of such peptides in mammalian cells may allow for screening of lanthipeptide inhibitors of native protein-protein interactions.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihpp-2023.10.19.563208v1-f0001.jpg

Introduction

Cyclic peptides represent a burgeoning area of interest in therapeutic and biotechnological research.18 In opposition to their linear counterparts, cyclic peptides are more conformationally constrained and less susceptible to proteolytic degradation.9 Such peptides therefore present unique opportunities in the design of protein-protein interaction (PPI) inhibitors and enhanced or novel bioactivities.4,6,1013 As the catalogue of ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs) continues to grow,14 an ever-expanding area of research has focused on the biotechnological applications of RiPP structures and pathways.14,15

Current methods for the generation of cyclic peptide libraries that can be interrogated for target binding or disrupting PPIs include phage display, bacterial display, yeast display, mRNA display, split-intein circular ligation of peptides and proteins (SICLOPPS), and split-and-pool synthesis.1,8,10,1624 Methods such as mRNA display and split-and-pool synthesis use in vitro peptide screening, making them particularly applicable for extracellular targets. Conversely, in cellulo cyclization using SICLOPPS allows identification of intracellular functional inhibitors of PPIs using monocyclic peptides.8,25 Display technologies for enzymatically cyclized, polycyclic peptides have been developed in bacteria,17 phage,18,19, and yeast19 but have also typically been screened against extracellular targets. Finally, while a method for intracellular RiPP production combined with a bacterial reversed two-hybrid screen was successfully developed in E. coli,26 expression of enzymatically produced, multi-cyclic peptides has not been reported in mammalian cells.27 Such technology could be valuable because target proteins would be in their native environment in terms of PPIs and post-translational modifications.8 First identified in 1934, the two-component lanthipeptide cytolysin is a toxin produced by Enterococcus faecalis, an opportunistic pathogen which, upon infection, may cause endocarditis, urinary tract infections, endophthalmitis, and alcoholic hepatitis.2830 Isolation of the pAD1 plasmid encoding the genes for cytolysin biosynthesis revealed that two peptides, CylLL and CylLS are modified by a single LanM enzyme (CylM), and subsequently cleaved into their mature bioactive forms (CylLL” and CylLS”) via the consecutive actions of the proteolytic activators CylB and CylA.31,32 Structural characterization showed that both peptides are class II lanthipeptides, with CylLL” containing three (methyl)lanthionines and CylLS” containing two thioether rings (Figure 1A).33,34 With the successful expression of cytolysin in an E. coli heterologous host, both CylLL” and CylLS” were demonstrated to be amenable to mutagenesis and structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies.35 Although cytolysin SAR has been explored, showing that the lanthipeptide synthetase CylM is tolerant towards changes in its substrate sequence, little has been done in pursuit of applying CylLL” or CylLS” for biotechnological applications. Given the covalently enforced helical structure of CylLL” due to three thioether staples as determined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy (Figure 1B),36 and the frequent occurrence of helices at the interface in PPIs,3740 CylLL” may be suitable as a template for disrupting protein-protein interactions.

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

Structure of the two-component cytolysin composed of CylLL” and CylLS” (A) and the two-component lanthipeptide haloduracin (B). Dehydrated residues are shown in blue while Cys residues involved in ring formation are shown in red. The hinge region of CylLL” is outlined in green. (C) NMR structure of the CylLL” subunit and (D) general biosynthetic machinery of class II lanthipeptides.

Class II lanthipeptides are biosynthesized in bacteria as ribosomally synthesized precursor peptides (LanA) with a leader peptide that is important for recognition by the LanM lanthionine synthetases, and a core peptide that is converted to the final mature structure (Figure 1D).41 The LanM proteins first dehydrate Ser and Thr residues in the core peptide by phosphorylating the side chain alcohols followed by phosphate elimination to form dehydroalanine (Dha) and dehydrobutyrine (Dhb), respectively.42 The same LanM protein then catalyzes Michael-type addition of the thiols of Cys residues to the Dha and Dhb residues.43 In the case of cytolysin, the substrate peptides are denoted CylLL and CylLS and the synthetase is CylM.33 The leader peptide can be removed with the protease CylA.44 In the case of haloduracin β, part of another class II two-component lanthipeptide (Figure 1C), the substrate is HalA2 and the enzyme HalM2.45

Herein, we describe the heterologous expression of CylLL and HalA2 with their modification enzymes CylM and HalM2 in mammalian cells leading to the successful installation of multiple macrocyclic thioether linkages. We also show successful localization of the lanthipeptides to the nucleus, demonstrating the potential in nuclear targeted PPI disruption. Our work provides a method for cyclic peptide generation in mammalian cells, illustrating the applicability and utility of this system for future biotechnological applications.

Results

CylLL” adopts a helical secondary structure in a biologically relevant environment

Of the two cytolysin components, the longer CylLL” forms a helical structure with the first helix comprised of rings A and B connected via a glycine linker (hinge region) to the second helix containing ring C (Figure 1B). The presence of such secondary structures is common within hemolytic peptides that target cell membrane components.4653 Importantly, CylLL” requires the presence of CylLS” for cytolytic and antimicrobial activity and requires removal of the leader peptide to be activated. Hence, we did not anticipate production of modified CylLL, which still contains the leader peptide, to be toxic to the cell. Previous NMR structural analysis revealed that the two CylLL” helices can adopt either an extended, linear conformation, or a more compact conformation with the second helix hinged at an angle. The secondary structure of CylLL” was determined in methanol which may have favored helix formation.29,36 To determine if helicity of the peptide is maintained in a physiologically relevant environment, the peptide was dissolved in PBS buffer and analyzed via circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy. Analysis of the spectrum demonstrated local minima at 208 nm and 222 nm indicative of an alpha helical secondary structure (Figure 2). With this confirmation of helical conformation of the post-translationally modified peptide in buffer, expression of CylLL and CylM was pursued in a HEK293 adherent cell line.

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Circular dichroism analysis of CylLL” in PBS. Five scans were obtained with PBS as a blank. Wavelengths were monitored from 200 – 250 nm. Data were smoothed with a Savitsky-Golay filter and visualized in R with loess smoothing (span = 0.2).

Design of a lanthipeptide mammalian expression vector

A multi-cistronic vector under the control of the constitutive CMV promoter was used for expression of CylLL (Figure S1). Due to differential codon usage and biases between bacteria and mammalian cells, the genes encoding the lanthipeptide synthetase CylM and its precursor peptide CylLL were codon optimized for Homo sapiens expression and commercially synthesized (see Supporting Information for sequences).54 The genes encoding CylM and CylLL were separated by the ribosomal-skipping, self-cleaving P2A peptide; P2A was chosen due to the observed higher expression of the second gene as well as high self-cleavage efficiency of the peptide.5557 To expand the versatility of our construct, we also included a FLAG tag and a Yellow Fluorescence-Activating and absorption-Shifting Tag (Y-FAST) at the N-terminus of the peptide. Y-FAST is a small protein which fluoresces upon binding of its fluorogenic substrate.58 While the FLAG-tag enables fixed cell immunofluorescence, the advantage of Y-FAST is the potential for dynamic and reversible live-cell imaging. Finally, an N-terminal hexa-His tag was added to the N-terminus of the peptide to allow for purification via Ni2+ affinity chromatography. The construct did not contain a selection marker and hence all data shown are from transient transfection. A second plasmid system was constructed with the same design but containing codon-optimized genes encoding HalA2 and HalM2.

Expression of lanthipeptides in mammalian cells

After expression, the peptides were purified from the cell lysate by metal affinity chromatography. Initial attempts at production of modified CylLL in HEK293 cells resulted in a fully eight-fold dehydrated peptide with a glutathione adduct (Figure S2). Glutathione (GSH) adducts to dehydroamino acids (Dha/Dhb) have been observed previously during heterologous production of lanthipeptides in E. coli.5962 LanC-like proteins (LanCL) have been shown to add GSH to peptides in mammalian cells, and indeed in vitro LanCL also adds GSH to CylLL.63 To determine the location of the GSH adduct produced in HEK293 cells, a chymotrypsin digest was performed followed by matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS). A resultant 1719 Da fragment was analyzed via LIFT fragmentation and shown to correspond to the non-glutathionylated C-terminal portion of the core peptide (Fig. S2). This observation indicated that the GSH adduct was located in the N-terminal portion of the core peptide. Since GSH adducts are more frequently observed on Dha than on Dhb residues because of the higher reactivity of the former, we hypothesized Dha15 (from dehydration of Ser15) to be glutathionylated. Therefore, Ser15 was mutated to Thr and subsequent expression of CylLL-S15T in a suspension cell line derivative of HEK293 (Expi293) demonstrated full modification (eight dehydrations) without GSH adducts (Figure 3; Fig. S3A). Furthermore, assessment of potentially uncyclized Cys residues by reaction with iodoacetamide (IAA)64 did not show any adducts indicating full cyclization (Figure S3A).

Figure 3:

Figure 3:

High resolution MS/MS of CylLL”-S15T modified by CylM (A) and HalA2 modified by HalM2 (B) in Expi293 cells. Dehydrated residues are indicated in lower-case. CylLL-S15T and HalA2 were digested with CylA and GluC, respectively, prior to HPLC purification and MS analysis.

Following successful production of modified CylLL, we applied the method to the production of another class II lanthipeptide, haloduracin β (Halβ). This peptide was chosen as previous research has shown the tolerance of the modifying enzyme HalM2.19,65 HalA2 expressed together with the synthetase HalM2 in Expi293 cells was fully dehydrated (Figure 3). Incubation of HalM2-modified HalA2 with N-ethylmaleimide (NEM)66 revealed no NEM adducts indicating complete cyclization (Supp. Figure 3B).

Bioactivity of lanthipeptides produced in mammalian cells

To confirm successful formation of CylLL”-S15T and Halβ with correct ring patterns, we tested the peptides produced in Expi293 for bioactivity. CylLL” in concert with CylLS” (obtained from bacterial expression)33 demonstrated robust antimicrobial activity towards Gram-positive bacteria. However, we did not observe growth inhibition when testing the CylLL”-S15T mutant against the indicator strain Lactococcus lactis sp. cremoris. This observation may be explained by a previous report that mutation of Ser15 severely attenuates anti-microbial activity.35 We also assayed Halβ produced in Expi293 for inhibitory activity against the indicator strain L. lactis CNRZ 117 when combined with Halα (Figure 1C) produced in E. coli.67 The α and β subunits alone did not inhibit L. lactis but when combined, we observed a zone of inhibition indicating correct structural formation of the β subunit in Expi293 cells (Figure 4).

Figure 4:

Figure 4:

Bioactivity of Halβ produced in mammalian cells. The Halβ core peptide contained two amino acids from the leader peptide (Ala-Gln), but previous studies have demonstrated that even six residues from the leader peptide did not abolish synergistic antimicrobial activity of Halβ when combined with Halα.68 Each peptide was tested at 100 pmol individually or combined (α + β) against the indicator strain L. lactis CNRZ 117. A deionized H2O negative control was included.

CylLL mutant peptides are expressed and modified in mammalian cells

CylLL-S15T was used as a template to generate an NDT (D = A/G/T) mutant library. The five mutated positions were chosen along the same helical face spanning the A and B rings of CylLL-S15T (Figure 5). Previous lanthipeptide libraries have employed NNK, NWY, and NDT degenerate codons.19,26,65 For this study, NDT codons were chosen for the following reasons. Firstly, it leads to a more diverse array of amino acids including both positively and negatively charged residues (Gly, Val, Leu, Ile, Cys, Ser, Arg, His, Asp, Asn, Phe, Tyr). Secondly, no stop codons are introduced, and thirdly each codon encodes one amino acid thereby preventing overrepresentation of a single amino acid.

Figure 5:

Figure 5:

Design of the NDT mutant library of CylLL” (A) NMR structure with mutated residues shown in blue and the position of mutated S15T residue in pink. B) Frequency of NDT encoded amino acids at each mutation site in the sequenced library.

Deep sequencing revealed a library size of 1.74 × 105 unique sequences, representing ~70% coverage of the theoretical library size (2.5 × 105). The decreased coverage may be explained by reduced transformation efficiency as well as the observation of a slight overrepresentation of the template sequence during library generation. Generally, however, the distribution of amino acids at the variable positions was near the statistical prediction (Fig. 5B). To determine if CylM could successfully modify CylLL-S15T derivatives in mammalian cells, five sequences from the NDT library were chosen randomly for expression in Expi293 cells. Of the five sequences, four were fully modified after co-expression with CylM (Table 1). Dehydrations were confirmed via high resolution tandem mass spectrometry (HR-MSMS) and cyclization was confirmed via iodoacetamide (IAA) assessment of the presence of free thiols (Figure 6). Tandem MSMS data for the four peptides supported similar ring patterns to that of CylL” (Supp. Figures 47). Mutation of a hinge region residue (Gly23) to Ser in variant 3 did not affect the ring pattern (Supp. Fig. 5).

Table 1:

CylLL”-S15T NDT variants

Variant Sequence # of dehydrations
1 TTPNCAFAATNAASTAACIWVGHGIFTGVTVVVSLKHC −7, −6
2 TTPDCARAATLAASTAACGWVGSGIFTGVTVVVSLKHC −7, −6
3 TTPFCASAATNAASTAACNWVGGGIFTGVTVVVSLKHC −8, −7
4 TTPICARAATLAASTAACNWVGHGIFTGVTVVVSLKHC −8, −7
5 TTPHCAVAATYAASTAACFWVGHGIFTGVTVVVSLKHC −5

Figure 6.

Figure 6

MALDI-TOF mass spectra of CylLL-S15T NDT variants modified in Expi293 cells by CylM before (black) and after (blue) iodoacetamide (IAA) reaction. Peptides were expressed in Expi293 cells and purified via Ni-NTA chromatography and analytical HPLC prior to IAA reaction. Reactions were desalted via C4 ziptip.

Lanthipeptides can be targeted to the nucleus in mammalian cells

Given the successful modification ofHalA2 and CylLL-S15T and its variants, we next focused on targeted localization of modified CylLL-S15T and HalA2 within mammalian cells. Nuclear targeting was chosen because transcription factor interactions are located within the nucleus that may be targets of PPI inhibition. A nuclear localization signal (KKKRKV) was appended to the N-terminus of the FLAG-tagged precursor peptides. Immunostaining of transfected HEK293 cells with an anti-FLAG antibody demonstrated colocalization of CylLL-S15T and HalA2 with the nuclear stain DAPI compared to the untargeted controls (Figure 7). To confirm nuclear-targeted lanthipeptides were still fully modified, nuclear localized CylLL and CylM were expressed in Expi293 cells and subsequent purification confirmed full dehydration of the peptide (Supp. Figure 7).

Figure 7:

Figure 7:

Confocal microscopy of untargeted and nuclear-targeted CylLL-S15T and HalA2. HEK293 cells were fixed and permeabilized two days post-transfection. The following stains were used. DAPI (blue, nucleus), phalloidin-488 (green, actin), and mouse Anti-FLAG primary antibody with goat anti-mouse Fluor647 secondary antibody (red, CylLL). Immunofluorescence was visualized at 63X magnification using an LSM880 confocal microscope.

Discussion

Herein we have described a method for the successful production of polycyclic lanthipeptides in mammalian cells as well as the successful nuclear localization of these peptides. Owing to their stability and structural diversity, cyclic peptides have garnered much interest for their therapeutic potential.4,69 Previous research has employed display and screening technologies to identify enzymatically generated polycyclic PPI inhibitors in bacteria and yeast.27 In vivo expression of such peptides in mammalian cells may allow for functional screening against native protein-protein interactions.

In 2013, the Arora group identified 7,308 helices present at protein interaction interfaces; further analysis revealed over 1,000 helical dimers involved in PPIs of enzymes, transcription factors, and other proteins of interest.70,71 Many of these interactions, such as that between MYC-MAX transcription factors, are critical in promoting cell proliferation in tumors; dysregulation of MYC-MAX activity has been shown to increase cancer progression with up to 70% of cancers bearing this hallmark.71,72 Disrupting such secondary structures can be accomplished through small molecules, antibodies, or peptides. However, both small molecules and antibodies have limitations in efficacy. Small molecule compounds cannot easily mimic the extended, globular 3-dimensional interfaces and also face high rates of clearance; antibodies, due to their large size, are mainly employed in disrupting extracellular PPIs.73 Helical and/or cyclic peptides may fill the gap because of their secondary structures, comparatively small sizes, and resistance to proteolytic cleavage.

Our results demonstrate the utility of lanthipeptide biosynthetic enzymes in the production of a diverse set of polycyclic structures within mammalian cells. Consequently, this method may expand the scope of therapeutic targets accessible to enzymatically generated polycyclic peptides.

Materials and Methods

Buffers and media

The pH of all buffers was adjusted using 1 M or 5 M NaOH and HCl and passed through a 0.2 μm filtration device. LanA resuspension buffer (B1) contained 6.0 M guanidine hydrochloride, 0.5 mM imidazole, 500 mM NaCl, 20 mM NaH2PO4 in DI H2O and the pH was adjusted to pH 7.5. LanA wash buffer (B2) contained 20 mM NaH2PO4, 30 mM imidazole, 300 mM NaCl in DI H2O and the pH was adjusted to pH 7.5. LanA elution buffer (EB) contained 20 mM Tris HCl, 1.0 M imidazole, and 100 mM NaCl in DI H2O and the pH was adjusted to pH 7.5. LanM start buffer contained 20 mM Tris HCl, 1 M NaCl, pH 7.6 and LanM final buffer was made up of 20 mM HEPES, 300 mM KCl, pH 7.5. A 1X solution of Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (PBS) was used.

Expression and purification of protease CylA

A culture of 10 mL LB with 10 μL of kanamycin solution (50 mg/mL; Kan50) was inoculated with E. coli BL21 containing pRSF_His-CylA44 from a frozen stock and incubated overnight at 37 °C, with shaking. A 1 L culture of Terrific Broth (TB) with 1 mL of Kan50 was inoculated with 10 mL of the overnight culture and incubated at 37 °C, with shaking at 220 rpm. The culture was induced with 500 μM IPTG (1 M stock) at mid-log phase and allowed to incubate overnight at 18 °C, with shaking at 200 rpm. After incubation, the culture was pelleted at 4500 g for 15 min and the resulting pellet was resuspended in 40 mL of LanM start buffer with lysozyme and allowed to incubate for 20 min on ice. Lysis was performed via sonication (39% amplitude, 4.4 s on, 9.9 s off) for at least 5 min. The lysate was pelleted at 13,000 g for 30 min and filtered through a 0.45 μm filter. Purification was performed using immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) with a 5 mL HisTrap column and an AKTA FPLC. The following conditions were used: the column was equilibrated with 2 – 3 column volumes (CV) of LanM start buffer followed by loading of the lysate; Buffer A = LanA B2, Buffer B = Elution buffer. The column was washed with 10% B for 2 CV, 15% B for 4 CV, and 50% B for 4 CV. Fractions containing CylA were determined via SDS-PAGE with a 4%−20% Tris gel at 200 V and collected, concentrated, and the buffer exchanged into LanM final buffer using a 30 kDa MWCO amicon filter. Aliquots were stored in LanM final buffer with 10% glycerol at −80 °C.

Expression and purification of CylLL in HEK293 cells

The plasmid construct encoding CylM and CylLL under a constitutive promoter was used to transfect HEK293 cells using Turbofect transfection reagent. HEK293 cells were grown in a 100 mm culture dish and were 70% – 90% confluent at the time of transfection. Cell media was changed 3 – 4 h post-transfection followed by an overnight incubation at 37 °C, 5% CO2. After incubation, media was aspirated and the cells were washed with cold 1X PBS. After PBS removal, 5 mL of Pierce IP lysis buffer and ½ of a Pierce protease inhibitor tablet was added to each 100 mm dish and allowed to incubate for 5 – 10 min at 4 °C. The cell lysate was pelleted at 1000 g for 5 min and the supernatant was purified via Ni resin affinity chromatography. The supernatant was washed with 3 CV of LanM start buffer with 25 mM imidazole and the peptide eluted in 1 CV of LanM start buffer with 0.5 M imidazole. The elution was treated with 5 – 10 μL of 1.6 μg/μL CylA and allowed to incubate overnight at room temperature. After acidification with 50% TFA/H2O, the elution was filtered through a 0.45 μm filter and purified on an Agilent 1260 Infinity analytical HPLC (aHPLC) with a Luna C8 (100 A) analytical column. The following conditions were used with a flow rate of 0.80 mL/min. with solvent A containing H2O + 0.1% TFA and solvent B containing ACN + 0.1% TFA: 2% B for 5 min., 2% B – 100% B over 20 min., 100% B for 5 min. UV absorbance was monitored at 220 nm and 254 nm. Fractions were collected manually and analyzed via matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometry and LIFT fragmentation using a Bruker UltrafleXtreme.

Generation of CylLL-S15T

Site-directed mutagenesis was performed using overlapping primers. The following polymerase chain reaction (PCR) conditions were used with Phusion polymerase in a 50 μL reaction volume. Each reaction contained 1X Phusion HF buffer, 1 M betaine, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 0.5 μM of each primer, 0.5 μL polymerase, at least 10 ng of DNA template, and DI H2O added up to 50 μL. Initial denaturation was performed for 2 min at 95 °C, followed by 26 cycles of denaturation (20 s, 95 °C), annealing (30 s, 69.8 °C), and elongation (7 min., 72 °C), and a final elongation step (72 °C) for 10 min. Successful amplification was confirmed via gel electrophoresis. After amplification, 1 μL of Dpn1 enzyme was added to each 50 μL reaction and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h, followed by a Qiagen PCR cleanup per the manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequently, 5 μL of amplified product was added to 50 μL of chemically competent NEBTurbo cells. Cells were kept on ice for 30 min., followed by heat shock at 42 °C for 30 s and recovery with 1 mL LB for 1 h. After recovery, cells were pelleted and ~ 700 μL of supernatant was removed; the pellet was resuspended in the remaining liquid, of which 50 μL was plated onto LB/Amp100. Following overnight incubation at 37 °C, single colonies were used to inoculate 10 mL LB/Amp100 and grown overnight at 37 °C. Plasmid extraction (Qiagen miniprep) was performed on the overnight cultures and plasmids were sequenced to determine successful mutagenesis.

Expression and purification of lanthipeptides in Expi293 cells

Expi293 cells were transfected with expression plasmids per the manufacturer’s instructions. Expression enhancers 1 and 2 were added, per manufacturer’s instructions, 19 – 21 h post-transfection followed by 4 days of incubation at 37 °C, 8% CO2. Cells were pelleted at 1000 g for 5 min and the resulting supernatant was removed. To each cell pellet, 3 – 5 mL of Pierce IP lysis buffer was added and allowed to incubate with gentle agitation at room temperature for 5 min. The lysate was pelleted at 1000 g for 5 min and the supernatant was purified via Ni-NTA affinity chromatography and analytical HPLC as described above.

Generation of an CylLL-S15T NDT mutant library

A primer containing degenerate NDT codons at five amino acid positions along CylLL-S15T was used to create a mutant library. The following polymerase chain reaction (PCR) conditions were used with Phusion polymerase in a 50 μL reaction volume aliquoted into 9 μL. Each reaction contained 1X Phusion HF buffer, 1 M betaine, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 0.125 μM of each primer, 0.5 μL polymerase, at least 10 ng of DNA template, and DI H2O added up to 50 μL. Initial denaturation was performed for 2 min at 95 °C, followed by 26 cycles of denaturation (20 s, 95 °C), annealing (30 s, 58 °C), and elongation (30 s, 72 °C), and a final elongation step (72 °C) for 5 min. Successful amplification was confirmed via gel electrophoresis. After amplification, 1 μL of Dpn1 enzyme was added to each 50 μL reaction and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h, followed by a Qiagen PCR cleanup per the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR linearized vector and NDT library inserts were assembled via Gibson Assembly (GA) per the manufacturer’s instructions and subsequently dialyzed against DI H2O using 0.02 μm membrane. ElectroMAX DH10B cells were transformed with the dialyzed GA reactions (2 reactions, 20 μL each) and recovered with 880 μL of Super Optimal broth with Catabolite repression (SOC) media for 1.5 – 2 h. Post-recovery, 100 μL of transformants were plated on Amp100 at 10−3 and 10−4 dilutions and incubated overnight at 37 °C. The remaining cells were used to inoculate 9 mL of LB (100 μg/mL Amp), incubated overnight at 37 °C, and the library DNA isolated using a Qiagen miniprep kit. NextGen sequencing was performed via SeqCenter and the reads analyzed using a custom Python script.

Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy

CylLL” was resuspended to 14.8 μM in 1X PBS. Samples were loaded into a 2 mm, Quartz spectrophotometer cell (Starna Cells, cat. no. 1-Q-2) and measured using an Olis Cary-16 circular dichroism spectrometer. Wavelengths in the range of 200 nm – 250 nm were monitored. Five scans were obtained and averaged for each sample. The data were smoothed with a Savitsky-Golay correction in RStudio.

High-resolution tandem mass spectrometry

Dried peptide samples were suspended in 0.1% formic acid/5% acetonitrile and injected into an UltiMate 3000 rsnLC coupled to a Q Exactive HF-X mass spectrometer (Thermo). Peptides were separated using a 25 cm Acclaim PepMap 100 C18 column (2 μm particle size, 75 μm ID) over the course of 45 min using mobile phases of 0.1% formic acid (A) and 0.1% formic acid in 80% acetonitrile (B); the gradient ran from 5% B to 60% B at 300 nL/min, followed by column washing and re-equilibration. Throughout the course of the run, the column was maintained at 50 °C. The mass spectrometer was operated in the positive mode in a data-dependent manner, where full MS1 scans from 350 to 2000 m/z were acquired at 120k resolution (3e6 AGC, 60 ms IT). MS2 scans of the top 15 most abundant ions were acquired at 45k resolution after HCD fragmentation (30 NCE; 5e4 AGC, 35 ms IT). The isolation width was 1.0 m/z, and the dynamic exclusion window was 15 s.

  • AGC: automatic gain control

  • IT: max injection time

  • NCE: normalized collision energy

Bioactivity assay of haloduracin

Modified core peptides were resuspended in sterile, DI H2O. The concentrations were then estimated using Pierce Quantitative Colorimetric Peptide Assay according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Agar well diffusion assays were used to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of the modified peptide cores against L. lactis CNRZ 117. A starter culture of indicator strain was grown static in M17 medium supplemented with 0.5% glucose under aerobic conditions at 30 °C overnight. Agar plates were prepared by combining molten M17 agar (cooled to 42 °C) supplemented with 0.5% glucose and 300 μL of overnight bacterial culture to yield a final volume of 40 mL. The seeded agar was poured into a sterile Petri dish and allowed to solidify at room temperature after which 100 pmol of modified peptides were spotted onto the agar plates. Plates were incubated at 30 °C overnight, and antimicrobial activity was qualitatively determined by the presence or absence of a zone of growth inhibition.

Iodoacetamide (IAA) reaction conditions

Purified CylM-modified CylLL-S15T mutants were resuspended in 100 μL of DI H2O and sonicated in a water bath for at least 5 min. To a 50 μL reaction, 5 μL of 100 mM TCEP, 5 μL of 200 mM KH2PO4 buffer pH 7.5, and 30 μL of peptide were added. The reaction was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C to allow for reduction of disulfide bonds, prior to addition of 5 μL of 100 mM IAA (in KH2PO4). Following IAA addition, the reaction was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Reactions were purified with C4 ziptip and analyzed via MALDI-TOF MS.

N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) assay

To a 50 μL reaction, 25 μL of DI H2O, 5 μL of 100 mM TCEP, 5 μL of 1 M citrate buffer (100 mM EDTA, pH 6), and 10 μL of peptide were added; it was assumed 100 μg of peptide was present when resuspended in DI H2O to a concentration of 100 μM. The reaction was incubated for 10 – 30 min at 37 °C to allow for reduction of disulfide bonds, prior to addition of 5 μL of 100 mM NEM (dissolved in ethanol). Following NEM addition, the reaction was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Reactions were purified with C4 ziptip and analyzed via MALDI-TOF MS.

Confocal microscopy

All steps were performed at room temperature. Cell media was removed and the cells were washed twice with 1 mL of 1X PBS. Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min and washed three times with 1 mL 1X PBS each time. Cells were then permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 (in 1X PBS) for 10 min and washed three times with 1 mL 1X PBS each time. Cells were blocked with 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 h and washed two-three times with 1X PBS. Primary anti-FLAG antibody (8146T, Cell Signaling Technologies) diluted 1:1000 in 1X PBS-T and incubated for 3 h. After primary antibody removal and washing (3x with 1 mL 1X PBS), goat anti-mouse-Fluor647 secondary antibody (A-21235, ThermoFisher) was diluted 1:1000 in 1X PBS-T and incubated for 1 h. Following another a wash step (3x with 500 μL 1X PBS), the coverslips were placed onto a slide containing ~ 7 μL of mounting media containing DAPI. The coverslip was allowed to cure for 30 min and the edges were sealed onto the slide with clear nail polish. Slides were stored at − 20 °C until visualization. Immunofluorescence was visualized using a Zeiss LSM880 microscope with 63X magnification and immersion oil (Immersol 518F). Images were analyzed using Zen software (2.3 SP1).

Supplementary Material

Supplement 1
media-1.pdf (672.5KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Roy J. Carver Biotechnology Center (CBC) and proteomics core at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign for high resolution mass spectrometry services. We also thank the Core Facilities at the Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology for the use of a confocal microscope and helpful advice.

Funding Sources

This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health (Grant R01 AI144967 to W.A.v.d.D.). S.M.E and I.R.R. are recipients of a NIGMS-NIH Chemistry-Biology Interface Training Grant (5T32-GM070421). A Bruker UltrafleXtreme mass spectrometer used was purchased with support from the National Institutes of Health (S10 RR027109).

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health (Grant R01 AI144967 to W.A.v.d.D.). S.M.E and I.R.R. are recipients of a NIGMS-NIH Chemistry-Biology Interface Training Grant (5T32-GM070421). A Bruker UltrafleXtreme mass spectrometer used was purchased with support from the National Institutes of Health (S10 RR027109).

Footnotes

Supporting Information. Supporting figures and tables. This material is available free of charge via the Inter-net at http://pubs.acs.org.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

REFERENCES

  • (1).Joo S. H. Cyclic peptides as therapeutic agents and biochemical tools. Biomol. Ther. 2012, 20, 19–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Walensky L. D.; Bird G. H. Hydrocarbon-stapled peptides: principles, practice, and progress. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 6275–6288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).White A. M.; Craik D. J. Discovery and optimization of peptide macrocycles. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2016, 11, 1151–1163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Zorzi A.; Deyle K.; Heinis C. Cyclic peptide therapeutics: past, present and future. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2017, 38, 24–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Naylor M. R.; Bockus A. T.; Blanco M. J.; Lokey R. S. Cyclic peptide natural products chart the frontier of oral bioavailability in the pursuit of undruggable targets. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2017, 38, 141–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Vinogradov A. A.; Yin Y.; Suga H. Macrocyclic peptides as drug candidates: recent progress and remaining challenges. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 4167–4181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Cyclic Peptides: from Bioorganic Synthesis to Applications; Koehnke J.; Naismith J.; van der Donk W. A., Eds.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Sohrabi C.; Foster A.; Tavassoli A. Methods for generating and screening libraries of genetically encoded cyclic peptides in drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2020, 4, 90–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Craik D. J.; Fairlie D. P.; Liras S.; Price D. The future of peptide-based drugs. Chem. Biol. Drug. Des. 2013, 81, 136–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Tavassoli A. SICLOPPS cyclic peptide libraries in drug discovery. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2017, 38, 30–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Majumdar S.; Siahaan T. J. Peptide-mediated targeted drug delivery. Med. Res. Rev. 2012, 32, 637–658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Tombling B. J.; Zhang Y.; Huang Y. H.; Craik D. J.; Wang C. K. The emerging landscape of peptide-based inhibitors of PCSK9. Atherosclerosis 2021, 330, 52–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Tucker T. J.; Embrey M. W.; Alleyne C.; Amin R. P.; Bass A.; Bhatt B.; Bianchi E.; Branca D.; Bueters T.; Buist N.; Ha S. N.; Hafey M.; He H.; Higgins J.; Johns D. G.; Kerekes A. D.; Koeplinger K. A.; Kuethe J. T.; Li N.; Murphy B.; Orth P.; Salowe S.; Shahripour A.; Tracy R.; Wang W.; Wu C.; Xiong Y.; Zokian H. J.; Wood H. B.; Walji A. A Series of Novel, Highly Potent, and Orally Bioavailable Next-Generation Tricyclic Peptide PCSK9 Inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 16770–16800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Montalbán-López M.; Scott T. A.; Ramesh S.; Rahman I. R.; van Heel A. J.; Viel J. H.; Bandarian V.; Dittmann E.; Genilloud O.; Goto Y.; Grande Burgos M. J.; Hill C.; Kim S.; Koehnke J.; Latham J. A.; Link A. J.; Martínez B.; Nair S. K.; Nicolet Y.; Rebuffat S.; Sahl H.-G.; Sareen D.; Schmidt E. W.; Schmitt L.; Severinov K.; Süssmuth R. D.; Truman A. W.; Wang H.; Weng J.-K.; van Wezel G. P.; Zhang Q.; Zhong J.; Piel J.; Mitchell D. A.; Kuipers O. P.; van der Donk W. A. New developments in RiPP discovery, enzymology and engineering. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2021, 38, 130–239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Do T.; Link A. J. Protein engineering in ribosomally synthesized and posttranslationally modified peptides (RiPPs). Biochemistry 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Passioura T.; Suga H. A RaPID way to discover nonstandard macrocyclic peptide modulators of drug targets. Chem. Comm. 2017, 53, 1931–1940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Bosma T.; Kuipers A.; Bulten E.; de Vries L.; Rink R.; Moll G. N. Bacterial display and screening of posttranslationally thioether-stabilized peptides. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 6794–6801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Urban J. H.; Moosmeier M. A.; Aumüller T.; Thein M.; Bosma T.; Rink R.; Groth K.; Zulley M.; Siegers K.; Tissot K.; Moll G. N.; Prassler J. Phage display and selection of lanthipeptides on the carboxy-terminus of the gene-3 minor coat protein. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Hetrick K. J.; Walker M. C.; van der Donk W. A. Development and application of yeast and phage display of diverse lanthipeptides. ACS Cent. Sci. 2018, 4, 458–467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Vinogradov A. A.; Shimomura M.; Goto Y.; Ozaki T.; Asamizu S.; Sugai Y.; Suga H.; Onaka H. Minimal lactazole scaffold for in vitro thiopeptide bioengineering. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Vinogradov A. A.; Shimomura M.; Kano N.; Goto Y.; Onaka H.; Suga H. Promiscuous enzymes cooperate at the substrate level en route to lactazole A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 13886–13897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Vinogradov A. A.; Zhang Y.; Hamada K.; Chang J. S.; Okada C.; Nishimura H.; Terasaka N.; Goto Y.; Ogata K.; Sengoku T.; Onaka H.; Suga H. De Novo Discovery of Thiopeptide Pseudo-natural Products Acting as Potent and Selective TNIK Kinase Inhibitors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Fleming S. R.; Himes P. M.; Ghodge S. V.; Goto Y.; Suga H.; Bowers A. A. Exploring the post-translational enzymology of PaaA by mRNA display. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 5024–5028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Heinis C.; Rutherford T.; Freund S.; Winter G. Phage-encoded combinatorial chemical libraries based on bicyclic peptides. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5, 502–507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Foster A. D.; Ingram J. D.; Leitch E. K.; Lennard K. R.; Osher E. L.; Tavassoli A. Methods for the creation of cyclic peptide libraries for use in lead discovery. J. Biomol. Screen. 2015, 20, 563–576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Yang X.; Lennard K. R.; He C.; Walker M. C.; Ball A. T.; Doigneaux C.; Tavassoli A.; van der Donk W. A. A lanthipeptide library used to identify a protein-protein interaction inhibitor. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2018, 14, 375–380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Bosma T.; Rink R.; Moosmeier M. A.; Moll G. N. Genetically encoded libraries of constrained peptides. ChemBioChem 2019, 20, 1754–1758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Todd E. W. A comparative serological study of streptolysins derived from human and from animal infections, with notes on pneumococcal h ae molysin, tetanolysin and staphylococcus toxin. J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 1934, 39, 299–321. [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Van Tyne D.; Martin M. J.; Gilmore M. S. Structure, function, and biology of the Enterococcus faecalis cytolysin. Toxins (Basel) 2013, 5, 895–911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Duan Y.; Llorente C.; Lang S.; Brandl K.; Chu H.; Jiang L.; White R. C.; Clarke T. H.; Nguyen K.; Torralba M.; Shao Y.; Liu J.; Hernandez-Morales A.; Lessor L.; Rahman I. R.; Miyamoto Y.; Ly M.; Gao B.; Sun W.; Kiesel R.; Hutmacher F.; Lee S.; Ventura-Cots M.; Bosques-Padilla F.; Verna E. C.; Abraldes J. G.; Brown R. S. Jr.; Vargas V.; Altamirano J.; Caballeria J.; Shawcross D. L.; Ho S. B.; Louvet A.; Lucey M. R.; Mathurin P.; Garcia-Tsao G.; Bataller R.; Tu X. M.; Eckmann L.; van der Donk W. A.; Young R.; Lawley T. D.; Starkel P.; Pride D.; Fouts D. E.; Schnabl B. Bacteriophage targeting of gut bacterium attenuates alcoholic liver disease. Nature 2019, 575, 505–511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Gilmore M. S.; Segarra R. A.; Booth M. C.; Bogie C. P.; Hall L. R.; Clewell D. B. Genetic structure of the Enterococcus faecalis plasmid pAD1-encoded cytolytic toxin system and its relationship to lantibiotic determinants. J. Bacteriol. 1994, 176, 7335–7344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (32).Segarra R. A.; Booth M. C.; Morales D. A.; Huycke M. M.; Gilmore M. S. Molecular characterization of the Enterococcus faecalis cytolysin activator. Infect. Immun. 1991, 59, 1239–1246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (33).Tang W.; van der Donk W. A. The sequence of the enterococcal cytolysin imparts unusual lanthionine stereochemistry. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2013, 9, 157–159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Tang W.; Jiménez-Osés G.; Houk K. N.; van der Donk W. A. Substrate control in stereoselective lanthionine biosynthesis. Nat. Chem. 2015, 7, 57–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (35).Rahman I. R.; Sanchez A.; Tang W.; van der Donk W. A. Structure-activity relationships of the enterococcal cytolysin. ACS Infect. Dis. 2021, 7, 2445–2454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (36).Bobeica S. C.; Zhu L.; Acedo J. Z.; Tang W.; van der Donk W. A. Structural determinants of macrocyclization in substrate-controlled lanthipeptide biosynthetic pathways. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 12854–12870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (37).Whitty A.; Kumaravel G. Between a rock and a hard place? Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006, 2, 112–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (38).Murray J. K.; Gellman S. H. Targeting protein-protein interactions: lessons from p53/MDM2. Biopolymers 2007, 88, 657–686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (39).Arkin M. R.; Whitty A. The road less traveled: modulating signal transduction enzymes by inhibiting their protein-protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2009, 13, 284–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (40).Gavenonis J.; Sheneman B. A.; Siegert T. R.; Eshelman M. R.; Kritzer J. A. Comprehensive analysis of loops at protein-protein interfaces for macrocycle design. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014, 10, 716–722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (41).Oman T. J.; van der Donk W. A. Follow the leader: the use of leader peptides to guide natural product biosynthesis. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2010, 6, 9–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (42).Chatterjee C.; Miller L. M.; Leung Y. L.; Xie L.; Yi M.; Kelleher N. L.; van der Donk W. A. Lacticin 481 synthetase phosphorylates its substrate during lantibiotic production. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15332–15333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (43).Xie L.; van der Donk W. A. Post-Translational Modifications during Lantibiotic Biosynthesis. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2004, 8, 498–507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (44).Tang W.; Bobeica S. C.; Wang L.; van der Donk W. A. CylA is a sequence-specific protease involved in toxin biosynthesis. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 46, 537–549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (45).McClerren A. L.; Cooper L. E.; Quan C.; Thomas P. M.; Kelleher N. L.; van der Donk W. A. Discovery and in vitro biosynthesis of haloduracin, a two-component lantibiotic. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103, 17243–17248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (46).Saravanan R.; Bhunia A.; Bhattacharjya S. Micelle-bound structures and dynamics of the hinge deleted analog of melittin and its diastereomer: implications in cell selective lysis by D-amino acid containing antimicrobial peptides. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1798, 128–139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (47).Ramamoorthy A.; Thennarasu S.; Lee D.-K.; Tan A.; Maloy L. Solid-state NMR investigation of the membrane-disrupting mechanism of antimicrobial peptides MSI-78 and MSI-594 derived from magainin 2 and melittin. Biophys. J. 2006, 91, 206–216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (48).Matsuzaki K.; Sugishita K.; Harada M.; Fujii N.; Miyajima K. Interactions of an antimicrobial peptide, magainin 2, with outer and inner membranes of Gram-negative bacteria. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Biomembr. 1997, 1327, 119–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (49).Gesell J.; Zasloff M.; Opella S. J. Two-dimensional 1H NMR experiments show that the 23-residue magainin antibiotic peptide is an α-helix in dodecylphosphocholine micelles, sodium dodecylsulfate micelles, and trifluoroethanol/water solution. J. Biomol. NMR 1997, 9, 127–135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (50).Hamada T.; Matsunaga S.; Fujiwara M.; Fujita K.; Hirota H.; Schmucki R.; Guntert P.; Fusetani N. Solution structure of polytheonamide B, a highly cytotoxic nonribosomal polypeptide from marine sponge. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 12941–12945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (51).Porcelli F.; Buck B.; Lee D.; Hallock K. J.; Ramamoorthy A.; Veglia G. Structure and orientation of pardaxin determined by NMR experiments in model membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 45815–45823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (52).Wang G. Structures of human host defense cathelicidin LL-37 and its smallest antimicrobial peptide KR-12 in lipid micelles. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 32637–32643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (53).Beevers A. J.; Dixon A. M. Helical membrane peptides to modulate cell function. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 2146–2157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (54).Gustafsson C.; Govindarajan S.; Minshull J. Codon bias and heterologous protein expression. Trends in Biotechnology 2004, 22, 346–353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (55).Liu Z.; Chen O.; Wall J. B. J.; Zheng M.; Zhou Y.; Wang L.; Vaseghi H. R.; Qian L.; Liu J. Systematic comparison of 2A peptides for cloning multi-genes in a polycistronic vector. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (56).Mizuguchi H.; Xu Z.; Ishii-Watabe A.; Uchida E.; Hayakawa T. IRES-dependent second gene expression is significantly lower than cap-dependent first gene expression in a bicistronic vector. Mol. Ther. 2000, 1, 376–382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (57).Kuzmich A. I.; Vvedenskii A. V.; Kopantzev E. P.; Vinogradova T. V. Quantitative comparison of gene co-expression in a bicistronic vector harboring IRES or coding sequence of porcine teschovirus 2A peptide. Russ. J. Bioorganic Chem. 2013, 39, 406–416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (58).Plamont M. A.; Billon-Denis E.; Maurin S.; Gauron C.; Pimenta F. M.; Specht C. G.; Shi J.; Querard J.; Pan B.; Rossignol J.; Moncoq K.; Morellet N.; Volovitch M.; Lescop E.; Chen Y.; Triller A.; Vriz S.; Le Saux T.; Jullien L.; Gautier A. Small fluorescence-activating and absorption-shifting tag for tunable protein imaging in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2016, 113, 497–502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (59).Bothwell I. R.; Caetano T.; Sarksian R.; Mendo S.; van der Donk W. A. Structural analysis of class I lanthipeptides from Pedobacter lusitanus NL19 reveals an unusual ring pattern. ACS Chem. Biol. 2021, 16, 1019–1029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (60).Van Staden A. D. P.; Faure L. M.; Vermeulen R. R.; Dicks L. M. T.; Smith C. Functional expression of GFP-fused class I lanthipeptides in Escherichia coli. ACS Synth. Biol. 2019, 8, 2220–2227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (61).Ayikpoe R. S.; Shi C.; Battiste A. J.; Eslami S. M.; Ramesh S.; Simon M. A.; Bothwell I. R.; Lee H.; Rice A. J.; Ren H.; Tian Q.; Harris L. A.; Sarksian R.; Zhu L.; Frerk A. M.; Precord T. W.; van der Donk W. A.; Mitchell D. A.; Zhao H. A scalable platform to discover antimicrobials of ribosomal origin. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 6135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (62).Lee H.; Wu C.; Desormeaux E. K.; Sarksian R.; van der Donk W. A. Improved production of class I lanthipeptides in Escherichia coli. Chem. Sci. 2023, 14, 2537–2546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (63).Lai K. Y.; Galan S. R. G.; Zeng Y.; Zhou T. H.; He C.; Raj R.; Riedl J.; Liu S.; Chooi K. P.; Garg N.; Zeng M.; Jones L. H.; Hutchings G. J.; Mohammed S.; Nair S. K.; Chen J.; Davis B. G.; van der Donk W. A. LanCLs add glutathione to dehydroamino acids generated at phosphorylated sites in the proteome. Cell 2021, 184, 2680–2695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (64).Li B.; Cooper L. E.; van der Donk W. A. In vitro studies of lantibiotic biosynthesis. Methods Enzymol. 2009, 458, 533–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (65).Guo E.; Fu L.; Fang X.; Xie W.; Li K.; Zhang Z.; Hong Z.; Si T. Robotic construction and screening of lanthipeptide variant libraries in Escherichia coli. ACS Synth. Biol. 2022, 11, 3900–3911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (66).Bobeica S. C.; van der Donk W. A. The enzymology of prochlorosin biosynthesis. Methods Enzymol. 2018, 604, 165–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (67).Oman T. J.; van der Donk W. A. Insights into the mode of action of the two-peptide lantibiotic haloduracin. ACS Chem. Biol. 2009, 4, 865–874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (68).Cooper L. E.; McClerren A. L.; Chary A.; van der Donk W. A. Structure-activity relationship studies of the two-component lantibiotic haloduracin. Chem. Biol. 2008, 15, 1035–1045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (69).Buckton L. K.; Rahimi M. N.; McAlpine S. R. Cyclic peptides as drugs for intracellular targets: The next frontier in peptide therapeutic development. Chem. Eur. J. 2021, 27, 1487–1513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (70).Bergey C. M.; Watkins A. M.; Arora P. S. HippDB: a database of readily targeted helical protein–protein interactions. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 2806–2807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (71).Watkins A. M.; Wuo M. G.; Arora P. S. Protein–protein interactions mediated by helical tertiary structure motifs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 11622–11630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (72).Duffy M. J.; O’Grady S.; Tang M.; Crown J. MYC as a target for cancer treatment. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2021, 94, 102154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (73).Rezaei Araghi R.; Keating A. E. Designing helical peptide inhibitors of protein–protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Struc. Biol. 2016, 39, 27–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (74).Brademan D. R.; Riley N. M.; Kwiecien N. W.; Coon J. J. Interactive peptide spectral annotator: A versatile web-based tool for proteomic applications. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2019, 18, S193–S201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1
media-1.pdf (672.5KB, pdf)

Articles from bioRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES