Skip to main content
Health Services Research logoLink to Health Services Research
. 1990 Jun;25(2):349–360.

Simple counts of the number of basic ADL dependencies for long-term care research and practice.

S S Travis 1, W J McAuley 1
PMCID: PMC1065632  PMID: 2113045

Abstract

General acceptance of a patterned progression of dependency in activities of daily living has led to the widespread practice of simply counting the individual's basic ADL dependencies to reflect his or her self-care needs and level of impairment. This method is convenient, and it is practical to the extent that individuals do fit a scaled pattern of dependency that allows some meaningful comparison among individuals and between groups to be made. This research, based on 3,611 Medicaid cases in Virginia, reports that 36 percent of those individuals screened for nursing home admission do not match a commonly accepted pattern of dependency. The analyses include a logistic regression procedure to explain the characteristics of the "ADL divergent" cases and a Guttman scaling procedure on the ADL data for the sample. Results of the analyses indicate that a Guttman scaling procedure does as well as, but not better than, the original Katz ADL scale, with both scales describing approximately two-thirds of the cases in the sample.

Full text

PDF
354

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. German P. S. Measuring functional disability in the older population. Am J Public Health. 1981 Nov;71(11):1197–1199. doi: 10.2105/ajph.71.11.1197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. KATZ S., FORD A. B., MOSKOWITZ R. W., JACKSON B. A., JAFFE M. W. STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION. JAMA. 1963 Sep 21;185:914–919. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Katz S., Akpom C. A. A measure of primary sociobiological functions. Int J Health Serv. 1976;6(3):493–508. doi: 10.2190/UURL-2RYU-WRYD-EY3K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Katz S., Downs T. D., Cash H. R., Grotz R. C. Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist. 1970 Spring;10(1):20–30. doi: 10.1093/geront/10.1_part_1.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Travis S. S., McAuley W. J. Medicaid elders in a rehabilitative trajectory. Rehabil Nurs. 1987 Mar-Apr;12(2):77–81. doi: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.1987.tb00561.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Weissert W., Wan T., Livieratos B., Katz S. Effects and costs of day-care services for the chronically ill: a randomized experiment. Med Care. 1980 Jun;18(6):567–584. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198006000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wyler A. R., Masuda M., Holmes T. H. Seriousness of illness rating scale. J Psychosom Res. 1968 Mar;11(4):363–374. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(68)90033-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Health Services Research are provided here courtesy of Health Research & Educational Trust

RESOURCES