Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1983 Jul;72(3):706–712. doi: 10.1104/pp.72.3.706

Phytochrome-Mediated Cellular Photomorphogenesis 1

John A Schaer 1, Dina F Mandoli 1, Winslow R Briggs 1
PMCID: PMC1066306  PMID: 16663071

Abstract

Red light-induced cell elongation and division in intact, etiolated oat (Avena sativa cv Lodi) seedlings have been assessed. The middle of coleoptile was especially responsive in the very low fluence range whereas the region immediately below the coleoptile tip and the two regions just above the coleoptilar node were more responsive than the entire organ in the low fluence range. These responses in the coleoptile are both the result of an increase in cell elongation. Coleoptile cell division is slightly inhibited in the very low and slightly stimulated by red light in the low fluence range.

The one-sixth of the mesocotyl closest to the node is more suppressed in its growth than is any other region in the very low fluence range. However, the low fluence response involved the entire mesocotyl equally. In the apical one-sixth of the mesocotyl, a strong suppression of cell division and a weak suppression of cell elongation occurs. In the lower five regions of the mesocotyl, red light in both fluence ranges suppresses only cell elongation. Apparently, the difference between red light-induced oat growth stimulation and suppression primarily involves differences in the response of the cell elongation process.

Full text

PDF
711

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Briggs W. R., Siegelman H. W. Distribution of Phytochrome in Etiolated Seedlings. Plant Physiol. 1965 Sep;40(5):934–941. doi: 10.1104/pp.40.5.934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Mandoli D. F., Briggs W. R. Phytochrome control of two low-irradiance responses in etiolated oat seedlings. Plant Physiol. 1981 Apr;67(4):733–739. doi: 10.1104/pp.67.4.733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Roesel H. A., Haber A. H. Studies of Effects of Light on Growth Pattern and of Gibberellin Sensitivity in Relation to Age, Growth Rate, and Illumination in Intact Wheat Coleoptiles. Plant Physiol. 1963 Sep;38(5):523–532. doi: 10.1104/pp.38.5.523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Vanderhoef L. N., Quail P. H., Briggs W. R. Red Light-inhibited Mesocotyl Elongation in Maize Seedlings: II. Kinetic and Spectral Studies. Plant Physiol. 1979 Jun;63(6):1062–1067. doi: 10.1104/pp.63.6.1062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Warner T. J., Ross J. D. Phytochrome control of maize coleoptile section elongation: the role of cell wall extensibility. Plant Physiol. 1981 Nov;68(5):1024–1026. doi: 10.1104/pp.68.5.1024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES