Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1984 Jan;74(1):117–122. doi: 10.1104/pp.74.1.117

Biological Activity of the Isomeric Forms of Helminthosporium sacchari Toxin and of Homologs Produced in Culture 1

Jonathan P Duvick 1,2,3, J M Daly 1,2,3, Z Kratky 1,2,3, V Macko 1,2,3, W Acklin 1,2,3, D Arigoni 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC1066636  PMID: 16663363

Abstract

The effect of Helminthosporium sacchari (HS) toxin isomers and related, pathogen-produced compounds on dark CO2 fixation in HS-susceptible sugar cane leaf slices was investigated. HS toxin consists of a mixture of three isomeric bis-5-O-(β-galactofuranosyl)-β-galactofuranosides (A, B, and C) differing in the position of one double bond in the sesquiterpene aglycone. Maximum inhibition of dark CO2 fixation in susceptible sugar cane (CP52-68) occurred within 30 to 40 minutes, and amounts necessary to reach 50% inhibition values typically were approximately 1.7 micromolar for natural toxin mixture (≃ 2:3:5 mixture of isomers A:B:C) and 4, 6, and 0.7 micromolar for isomers A, B, and C, respectively. Other fractions from cultures of the pathogen consist of comparable mixtures of sesquiterpene isomers but have only 1, 2, or 3 galactofuranose units (HS1, HS2, HS3) or two α-glucopyranose units as well as four β-galactofuranose units (HS6). The lower toxin homologs were not toxic to clone CP52-68, but protected sugar cane from the effects of toxin. Minimum ratios of protectant: toxin giving 95% protection were approximately 50:1, 6:1, and 12:1 for HS1, HS2, and HS3, respectively. HS2 and HS3 protected when added up to 12 minutes after toxin as well as when added with or before toxin. Some common plant galactopyranosides were not toxic and did not protect at 500:1 molar excess. The sample of HS6 was toxic at 500 micromolar, and did not protect against HS toxin. With the availability of purified, homogeneous preparations of HS toxin, homologs, and chemically modified or synthetic analogs, the dark CO2 fixation assay should prove to be a useful tool for understanding the mode of action of HS toxin.

Full text

PDF
117

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Byther R. S., Steiner G. W. Heat-induced Resistance of Sugarcane to Helminthosporium sacchari and Helminthosporoside. Plant Physiol. 1975 Sep;56(3):415–419. doi: 10.1104/pp.56.3.415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Daly J. M., Barna B. A Differential Effect of Race T Toxin on Dark and Photosynthetic CO(2) Fixation by Thin Leaf Slices from Susceptible Corn. Plant Physiol. 1980 Oct;66(4):580–583. doi: 10.1104/pp.66.4.580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Davies D. D. Control of and by pH. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1973;27:513–529. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Larkin P. J., Scowcroft W. R. Eyespot Disease of Sugarcane : INDUCTION OF HOST-SPECIFIC TOXIN AND ITS INTERACTION WITH LEAF CELLS. Plant Physiol. 1981 Mar;67(3):408–414. doi: 10.1104/pp.67.3.408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Livingston R. S., Scheffer R. P. Conversion of Helminthosporium sacchari Toxin to Toxoids by beta-Galactofuranosidase from Helminthosporium. Plant Physiol. 1983 Jun;72(2):530–534. doi: 10.1104/pp.72.2.530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Livingston R. S., Scheffer R. P. Isolation and characterization of host-selective toxin from Helminthosporium sacchari. J Biol Chem. 1981 Feb 25;256(4):1705–1710. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Strobel G. A. The helminthosporoside-binding protein of sugarcane. Its properties and relationship to susceptibility to the eye spot disease. J Biol Chem. 1973 Feb 25;248(4):1321–1328. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Strobel G. A. The relationship between membrane ATPase activity in sugarcane and heat-induced resistance to helminthosporoside. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979 Jul 5;554(2):460–468. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(79)90384-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wintermans J. F., de Mots A. Spectrophotometric characteristics of chlorophylls a and b and their pheophytins in ethanol. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1965 Nov 29;109(2):448–453. doi: 10.1016/0926-6585(65)90170-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES