Skip to main content
Health Services Research logoLink to Health Services Research
. 1987 Feb;21(6):715–739.

Comments on HCFA hospital death rate statistical outliers. Health Care Financing Administration.

M S Blumberg
PMCID: PMC1068986  PMID: 3106265

Abstract

In March 1986, the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) released ten lists of death-rate "outlier" hospitals, one for all 1984 Medicare discharges and nine for specific DRGs. Recent Medicare hospital discharge abstracts have substantially undercounted in-hospital deaths, with large variations by state. Apart from the proportion of a hospital's cases in 80 DRGs, the predictive models had no measures of case severity based on diagnosis or procedure. Having DRG 123 (all deaths from acute myocardial infarction) as an independent variable in the all-death regression model probably accounted for much of its high r2. Inclusion of an independent variable for average length of stay (ALOS) favored hospitals in higher ALOS states by higher predicted death rates. Model bias also favored lower-risk hospitals. Small numbers of predicted deaths for specific DRGs limited low-volume hospitals on these outlier lists to those with high ratios of actual to predicted deaths. On six of the nine DRG-specific outlier lists, a total 1,222 hospitals had unfavorable residuals, while only 8 were favorable. Ten recommendations are given to increase reliability of future outcome analyses.

Full text

PDF
739

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blumberg M. S. Risk adjusting health care outcomes: a methodologic review. Med Care Rev. 1986 Fall;43(2):351–393. doi: 10.1177/107755878604300205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brewster A. C., Karlin B. G., Hyde L. A., Jacobs C. M., Bradbury R. C., Chae Y. M. MEDISGRPS: a clinically based approach to classifying hospital patients at admission. Inquiry. 1985 Winter;22(4):377–387. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Francis A. M., Polissar L., Lorenz A. B. Care of patients with colorectal cancer. A comparison of a health maintenance organization and fee-for-service practices. Med Care. 1984 May;22(5):418–429. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198405000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Garber A. M., Fuchs V. R., Silverman J. F. Case mix, costs, and outcomes. Differences between faculty and community services in a university hospital. N Engl J Med. 1984 May 10;310(19):1231–1237. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198405103101906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gonnella J. S., Hornbrook M. C., Louis D. Z. Staging of disease. A case-mix measurement. JAMA. 1984 Feb 3;251(5):637–644. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lubitz J., Riley G., Newton M. Outcomes of surgery among the Medicare aged: mortality after surgery. Health Care Financ Rev. 1985 Summer;6(4):103–115. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pettengill J., Vertrees J. Reliability and validity in hospital case-mix measurement. Health Care Financ Rev. 1982 Dec;4(2):101–128. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Restuccia J. D., Gertman P. A comparative analysis of appropriateness of hospital use. Health Aff (Millwood) 1984 Summer;3(2):130–138. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.3.2.130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Scitovsky A. A. "The high cost of dying": what do the data show? Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1984 Fall;62(4):591–608. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Health Services Research are provided here courtesy of Health Research & Educational Trust

RESOURCES