Skip to main content
International Journal of Molecular Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Sciences
. 2023 Nov 22;24(23):16594. doi: 10.3390/ijms242316594

Novel CRYGC Mutation in Conserved Ultraviolet-Protective Tryptophan (p.Trp131Arg) Is Linked to Autosomal Dominant Congenital Cataract

Flora Delas 1, Samuel Koller 1, Silke Feil 1, Ivanka Dacheva 2, Christina Gerth-Kahlert 3,*,, Wolfgang Berger 1,4,5,*,
Editors: Salvatore Saccone, Hiroshi Tomita
PMCID: PMC10706789  PMID: 38068917

Abstract

Congenital cataract (CC), the most prevalent cause of childhood blindness and amblyopia, necessitates prompt and precise genetic diagnosis. The objective of this study is to identify the underlying genetic cause in a Swiss patient with isolated CC. Whole exome sequencing (WES) and copy number variation (CNV) analysis were conducted for variant identification in a patient born with a total binocular CC without a family history of CC. Sanger Sequencing was used to confirm the variant and segregation analysis was used to screen the non-affected parents. The first de novo missense mutation at c.391T>C was identified in exon 3 of CRYGC on chromosome 2 causing the substitution of a highly conserved Tryptophan to an Arginine located at p.Trp131Arg. Previous studies exhibit significant changes in the tertiary structure of the crystallin family in the following variant locus, making CRYGC prone to aggregation aggravated by photodamage resulting in cataract. The variant can be classified as pathogenic according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) criteria (PP3 + PM1 + PM2 + PS2; scoring 10 points). The identification of this novel variant expands the existing knowledge on the range of variants found in the CRYGC gene and contributes to a better comprehension of cataract heterogeneity.

Keywords: congenital cataract, CRYGC, crystallin, whole exome sequencing, conserved tryptophan, UV damage

1. Introduction

Congenital cataract (CC), referring to any light scattering due to clouding of the crystalline lens detected at birth, is one of the leading causes of treatable childhood blindness and amblyopia worldwide [1,2,3]. It affects one to nine newborns per 10,000 live births globally [4]. Approximately 50% of CCs are inherited [5]. Inherited cataracts can phenotypically be distinguished by localization (i.e., polar, nuclear, lamellar, cortical, total), type of opacity (i.e., solid, pulverulent, blue dot, crystalline), and presence of sutural opacity (affecting y-sutures of the fetal lens nucleus), and are described accordingly: anterior polar, posterior polar, lamellar, cortical, nuclear, aculeiform, total, pulverulent, cerulean, or polymorphic cataracts [6]. Inherited CC may manifest independently (70%), with other ocular abnormalities (e.g., microphthalmia being the most common) (15%), or in conjunction with other systemic findings i.e., syndromic (15%) [7,8]. They are predominantly inherited in an autosomal dominant manner, therefore particularly penetrant, and display an extensive genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity; thus, it challenging to establish a genotype–phenotype correlation in CC [8,9]. The detection efficiency of genetic variants in familial and sporadic cataracts varies greatly. Panel-based sequencing shows a detection rate of around 75% in familial cases and ranges from 26% to 68% in sporadic cases [10,11]. Unknown genetic and nongenetic factors contribute to sporadic cases [11]. Whole exome sequencing (WES) has been shown to offer a higher diagnostic yield compared to a panel-based analysis, and according to recent studies, WES represents the genetic test of choice rather than whole genome sequencing (WGS) [9,12]. To date, the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) documented the identification of 49 loci and 37 genes associated with isolated CC (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/omim/ (accessed on 9 July 2023)). These associated genes can broadly be grouped into cytoplasmic proteins (i.e., crystallins), membrane proteins (i.e., connexins, aquaporins), cytoskeletal proteins, and DNA/RNA-binding proteins (i.e., transcription factors) [13,14].

Crystallin proteins make up over 90% of the soluble human lens protein; they are non-renewable, thus unusually stable serving a lifetime, and play a pivotal role in maintaining lens transparency and the refractive index of the lens [15,16]. Numerous mutations in the 12 crystallin (CRY) genes have been identified, accounting for almost 50% of all autosomal dominant inherited cataracts in humans described thus far [14]. There are three groups of crystallin proteins, α-, β-, and γ-crystallins. α-crystallins are small heat shock proteins. They exert their chaperone function by binding to unfolded or damaged β- and γ-crystallins to prevent their aggregation, preserving lens transparency [13]. β- and γ-crystallins function as structural proteins and contain Greek key domains as secondary protein structures [13]. A primary distinction between β- and γ-crystallins lies in their ability to assemble into oligomers. While γ-crystallins solely occur to be monomeric, β-crystallins have the capacity to form various oligomeric structures, like homomers or heteromers, ranging from dimers to octamers [17]. It is known that the Greek key domains in γ-crystallin contain four highly conserved Tryptophan (Trp) residues (i.e., Trp43, Trp69, Trp131, and Trp157), crucial for both protein stability and enabling ultraviolet radiation (UV) absorption with minimal protein damage (as in protein aggregation), which maintains lens transparency, ensuring UV protection for the retina [17,18]. Extensive photodamage to Trp residues within β- and γ-crystallin has widely been implicated as a contributing factor in the development of age-related cataracts [19]. The four conserved Trp residues display an efficient fluorescence quenching mechanism, which is understood to be an evolved property of protein folding, allowing UV absorption with minimal protein photodamage and delayed cataract formation [18].

In this study, we identified a de novo missense mutation in the crystallin γC (CRYGC) gene using WES, causing a substitution of one of the highly conserved Tryptophan at p.Trp131Arg in a patient with congenital nuclear cataract.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient

The index patient was identified through the cataract genetic study. The cataract genetic study at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, together with the Institute of Medical Molecular Genetics, University of Zurich, aims to characterize congenital cataracts by phenotype and genotype identification. Patients are identified and recruited through close collaboration with other ophthalmic centers in Switzerland. A detailed retrospective chart review was performed. In addition, the father received an undilated eye examination. Blood samples were collected from the index patient and both parents. The study adhered to the Good Clinical Practices and followed the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki [20]. Approval for genetic testing in human patients was awarded to the Institute of Medical Molecular Genetics by the Cantonal Ethics Committee of Zurich (Ref-No. 2019-00108). Written consent of the legal guardian of the patient was obtained.

2.2. Genes of Interest

The gene list of Rechsteiner et al. 2021 [9] was expanded through the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) as well as a current literature search (Supplementary Material, Table S1). The gene list compiles cataract-associated candidate genes (syndromic and non-syndromic phenotypes), as well as cataract-associated genes in animal models.

2.3. Exome Sequencing and Analysis

We performed exome sequencing and analysis as previously described [9,21,22]. In brief, DNA was isolated from venous blood samples using the Chemagic DNA Blood Kit (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA), fragmentation was executed using M220 Sonicator (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA), and library preparation was performed using the IDT-Illumina TruSeq DNA Exome protocol (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA and Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, USA). Paired-end sequencing (2 × 75 bp) was executed using the NextSeq 550 instrument (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The reads were aligned to the human genome (GRCh37) and variant calling was accomplished using Burrows–Wheeler Aligner (BWA) v0.7.17 on BaseSpace Onsite (Illumina). AlamutBatch version 1.10 (Interactive Biosoftware, Rouen, France) was used for variant annotation. Copy number variations (CNVs) within the genes of interest (Table S1) were collected from exome coverage depth data (Sequence Pilot version 5.0; JSI Medical Systems GmbH, Ettenheim, Germany). Variants with a heterozygous allele frequency > 1%, a homozygous allele frequency > 0.01% (gnomAD heterozygous, and homozygous frequency of all populations; https://gnomad.broadinsitute.org/ (accessed on 12 June 2023)), and a Combined Annotation-Dependent Depletion (CADD) score ≤ 20 were discarded.

2.4. Segregation Analysis

Segregation analysis was performed using Sanger sequencing as described in detail by Haug et al. (2021) [21]. In brief, the region of interest was amplified by PCR. Cycle sequencing was performed on the PCR products using BigDye™ Terminator V1.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), followed by ethanol precipitation purification, and sequencing on a SeqStudio (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) capillary sequencer.

3. Results

3.1. Case Presentation

The patient was diagnosed with an abnormal red reflex at the age of 2.5 months and referred for further evaluation to the Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen. Examination revealed a bilateral symmetrical dense and almost complete nuclear cataract not allowing fundus visibility. No associated ocular anomalies were diagnosed, particularly no microcornea or microphthalmia. The child was born on term, was developing well, and did not show any dysmorphic and/or systemic features. The family history did not reveal CCs, developmental and/or ocular anomalies, and consanguinity is not known. Lensectomy with primary posterior capsulotomy and anterior vitrectomy were performed in both eyes immediately after the diagnosis, within one week apart. The postoperative course in the left eye was complicated by increased inflammation despite intensive topical antibiotic and steroid treatment. After a second surgical intervention with detailed synechiolysis, no further complications occurred. Refractive correction was achieved by contact lens correction and bifocal glasses for near. Convergent strabismus and amblyopia in the right eye were diagnosed at the age of 13 months. Additionally, a secondary high-frequency pendular nystagmus to the left was described. Amblyopia treatment with patching therapy was initiated. Bilateral aphakic glaucoma was diagnosed at the age of 17 months and treated with topical anti-glaucomatous medication. The patient received cyclophotocoagulation in the right eye at three years of age. Intraocular pressure was controlled by topical medication until the last follow-up at the age of 10 years. The optic nerve displayed an increased cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) of 0.8 in the right eye. At this age, visual acuity (Snellen decimal) with contact lenses (right eye 10.75 diopters (dpt), left eye 14.5 dpt) and near correction of +6.0 dpt measured 0.2 and 0.3 at distance, and 0.3 and 0.4 at near, for the right and left eye, respectively.

3.2. Segregation Analysis

An index patient WES data analysis of the selected genes (n = 278) revealed a total of 475 variants (12 deletions, 1 insertion, 6 duplications, and 456 substitutions). Due to the index patient being the only affected family member, we focused our filtering on de novo and recessive variants. Filtering for variants with heterozygous allele frequency ≤ 1% and homozygous allele frequency ≤ 0.01% revealed seven variants with a CADD score ≥ 20, one of which was revealed to be classified as pathogenic (PP3 + PM1 + PM2 + PS2; scoring 10 points) by means of the standard guidelines of interpretations according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) [23] and highly damaging (score of 0.983 HumVar, sensitivity: 0.56; specificity: 0.94) according to PolyPhen2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph/ (accessed on 9 June 2023)). The identified variant, located in exon 3 (c.391T>C) of CRYGC (RefSeq NM_ 020989.4), causes a protein change from a highly conserved Tryptophan across species (Figure 1) with a phyloP score of 7.02 (indicating a high level of evolutionary conservation) to Arginine in codon 131 (p.Trp131Arg) (Table 1). No mosaicism was found in either blood sample; however, germline mosaicism remains unknown. Due to absence of the variant in both parents, it is considered de novo and has been verified using Sanger Sequencing as indicated (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Amino acid conservation across species (https://www.ensembl.org/index.html (accessed on 4 September 2023)). The Tryptophan (W; marked red) affected by the identified variant is highly conserved among species. Dark blue indicates high, medium blue indicates moderate, light blue indicates minor and white indicates low conservation across species.

Table 1.

Disease-causing variant identified by WES.

Gene CRYGC
cDNA NM_020989.4:c.391T>C
Predicted amino acid change p.Trp131Arg
Zygosity het
gnomAD n/a
Mode of inheritance ad
Region Exon 3
ACMG pathogenic (PP3 + PM1 + PM2 + PS2) [23]

Acronyms: ACMG, American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics; het, heterozygous; n/a, not available; ad, autosomal dominant.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Sanger Sequencing variant verification.

4. Discussion

The CRYGC protein, like all γ-crystallins, exhibits a distinctive structural arrangement with a two-domain β-structure, consisting of four Greek key motifs that are remarkably similar in their folding pattern, displaying a high degree of symmetry and strong stability consequently [24]. As indicated in Table 2, 41 disease-causing mutations have been identified in CRYGC thus far, all of which cause various types of CC with or without microphthalmia. Most CRYGC mutations display a severe disruption of protein stability and symmetry due to either a frameshift or stop gain mutation (Table 2). Chen et al. (2009) [18] revealed significant findings on the ability to effectively quench excited states through electrostatic interactions of four highly conserved Tryptophans (Trp 43, Trp69, Trp131, and Trp 157) on a protein basis, to be an evolved property of all γ-crystallins to maintain the tertiary structure as a form of UV protection. Thus far, only 14 CRYGC missense mutations have been published, none of which affect these highly conserved Tryptophans (Table 2).

Table 2.

Previously described disease-causing CRYGC variants.

Exon/
Intron
cDNA Amino Acid Change Coding Effect Protein
Domain
Phenotype Reference
Exon 2 NM_020989.4:c.13A>C p.Thr5Pro missense 1st Greek key Coppock-like CC Heon et al. (1999) [25]; Berry et al. (2020) [26]
Exon 2 NM_020989.4:c.17T>C p.Phe6Ser missense 1st Greek key Lamellar CC Astiazaran et al. (2018) [27]
Exon 2 NM_020989.4:c.83C>T p.Pro28Leu missense 1st Greek key Nuclear CC + microphthalmos + nystagmus Jiao, et al. (2022) [28]
Exon 2 NM_020989.4:c.110G>C p.Arg37Pro missense 1st Greek key CC NFS Zhang et al. (2019) [29]
Exon 2 NM_020989.4:c.134T>C p.Leu45Pro missense 2nd Greek key Non-syndromic CC Gillespie et al. (2014) [10]; Fu et al. (2021) [30]
Exon 2 NM_020989.4:c.136T>G p.Tyr46Asp missense 2nd Greek key Nuclear CC Zhong et al. (2017) [31]; Fu et al. (2021) [30]
Exon 2 NM_020989.4:c.143G>A p.Arg48His missense 2nd Greek key Nuclear pulverulent CC; unilateral CC + optic disc coloboma Kumar et al. (2011) [32]; Sun et al. (2017) [33]
Exon 2 NM_020989.4: c.164A>G p.Gln55Arg missense 2nd Greek key CC NFS Karahan et al. (2021) [34]
Exon 2 NM_020989.4:c.173T>C p.Leu58Pro missense 2nd Greek key CC NFS Moon et al. (2021) [35]
Exon 2 NM_020989.4:c.233C>T p.Ser78Phe missense 2nd Greek key CC + microcornea Li et al. (2018) [36]
Exon 3 NM_020989.4:c.280G>A p.Glu94Lys missense 3rd Greek key Unilateral total CC Li et al. (2016) [37]
Exon 3 NM_020989.4:c.385G>T p.Gly129Cys missense 4th Greek key CC NFS Li et al. (2012) [38]; Xi et al. (2015) [39]
Exon 3 NM_020989.4:c.497C>T p.Ser166Phe missense 4th Greek key Nuclear CC + microphthalmos Prokudin et al. (2014) [40]; Zhong et al. (2017) [31]; Fan et al. (2020) [41]; Ma et al. (2016) [42]
Exon 3 NM_020989.4:c.502C>T p.Arg168Trp missense 4th Greek key Lamellar/nuclear CC + peripupillary iris atrophy, nystagmus, Santhiya et al. (2022) [43]; Gonzaez-Huerta et al. (2007) [44]; Devi et al. (2008) [45]
Exon 3 NM_020989.4:c.327C>A p.Cys109Ter nonsense 3rd Greek key Nuclear CC Yao et al. (2008) [46]
Exon 3 NM_020989.4:c.337C>T p.Gln113Ter nonsense 3rd Greek key Nuclear CC Li et al. (2016) [37]
Exon 3 NM_020989.4:c.382G>T p.Glu128Ter nonsense 3rd Greek key Nuclear CC Kandaswamy et al. (2020) [47]
Exon 3 NM_020989.4:c.402C>G p.Tyr134Ter nonsense 4th Greek key CC NFS Gillespie et al. (2014) [10]
Exon 3 NM_020989.4:c.403G>T p.Glu135Ter nonsense 4th Greek key CC + microcornea Patel et al. (2017) [48]
Exon 3 NM_020989.4:c.417C>G p.Tyr139Ter nonsense 4th Greek key Total CC + microphthalmos Reis et al. (2013) [49]
Exon 3 NM_020989.4:c.417C>A p.Tyr139Ter nonsense 4th Greek key Nuclear CC + microcornea Zhong et al. (2017) [31]
Exon 3 NM_020989.4:c.432C>G p.Tyr144Ter nonsense 4th Greek key Nuclear CC Zhong et al. (2017) [31]; Sun et al. (2017) [33]; Taylan Sekeroglu et al. (2020) [50]
Exon 3 NM_020989.4:c.470G>A p.Trp157Ter nonsense 4th Greek key Nuclear CC + microcornea Zhang et al. (2009) [51]; Kessel et al. (2021) [52]
Exon 3 NM_020989.4:c.471G>A p.Trp157Ter nonsense 4th Greek key Nuclear CC + microcornea Guo et al. (2012) [53]
Exon 3 NM_020989.4:c.505A>T p.Arg169Ter nonsense 4th Greek key Nuclear CC Zhong et al. (2017) [31]
Intron 1 NM_020989.4:c.10-1G>A splicing CC NFS Zhuang et al. (2019) [54]
Exon 2 NM_020989.4:c.119_123dupGCGGC p.Cys42AlafsTer63 frameshift 2nd Greek key Zonular pulverulent CC Ren et al. (2000) [55]
Exon 2 NM_020989.4:c.124delT p.Cys42AlafsTer61 frameshift 2nd Greek key Total CC ± microphthalmos Kondo et al. (2013) [56]
Exon 2 NM_020989.4:c.130delA p.Met44CysfsTer59 frameshift 2nd Greek key Total CC + microcornea Sun et al. (2017) [33]
Exon 2 NM_020989.4:c.157_161dup-GCGGC p.Gln55ValfsTer50 frameshift 2nd Greek key CC NFS Reis et al. (2013) [49]
Exon 2 NM_020989.4:c.179delG p.Arg60GlnfsTer43 frameshift 2nd Greek key Nuclear CC Berry et al. (2020) [26]
Exon 2 NM_020989.4:c.192delC p.Asp65ThrfsTer38 frameshift 2nd Greek key CC NFS Fan et al. (2020) [41]
Exon 2 NM_020989.4:c.193delG p.Asp65ThrfsTer38 frameshift 2nd Greek key Nuclear CC Zhong et al. (2017) [31]
Exon 3 NM_020989.4:c.320_321del-AA p.Glu107GlyfsTer56 frameshift 3rd Greek key Total CC Rechsteiner et al. (2021) [9]
Exon 3 NM_020989.4:c.328_329del-CCinsT p.Pro110SerfsTer37 frameshift 3rd Greek key Lamellar CC Ma et al. (2016) [42]
Exon 3 NM_020989.4:c.386_389dup-GCTG p.Cys130TrpfsTer35 frameshift 4th Greek key Nuclear CC ± microphthalmos Zhou et al. (2022) [57]
Exon 3 NM_020989.4:c.394delG p.Val132SerfsTer15 frameshift 4th Greek key Total CC + microphthalmos Peng et al. (2022) [13]
Exon 3 NM_020989.4:c.423delG p.Arg142GlyfsTer5 frameshift 4th Greek key Nuclear CC Zhong et al. (2017) [31]
Exon 3 NM_020989.4:c.423dupG p.Arg142AlafsTer22 frameshift 4th Greek key Nuclear CC Zhong et al. (2017) [31]
Exon 3 NM_020989.4:c.425_432dup p.Leu145GlyfsTer5 frameshift 4th Greek key Nuclear CC + microphthalmos + iris malformations Fernández-Alcalde et al. (2021) [58]
Exon 3 NM_020989.4:c.438delG p.Arg147GlyfsTer32 frameshift 4th Greek key Nuclear CC Fernandez-Alcade et al. (2021) [58]

Acronyms: CC, congenital cataract; NFS, not further specified.

Out of all crystallin families, only five mutations in conserved Tryptophans have been published thus far (Table 3). Wang et al. (2011) [59] reported the first human γ-crystallin mutation in one of the four conserved Trp residues, p.Trp43Arg in CRYGD, in a Chinese family with autosomal dominant nuclear CC, revealing notable alteration in the tertiary structure despite a lack of secondary structural changes, as well as protein aggregation upon UV radiation of the CRYGD mutant. Ji et al. (2013) [60], on the contrary, described a very similar x-ray structure between the wild-type CRYGD and the p.Trp43Arg mutant. Instead, a significant change in the stability and solubility behavior has been demonstrated, particularly in terms of protein folding and unfolding dynamics, being responsible for cataract formation (i.e., protein precipitation and aggregation) [60]. Interestingly, there is a link between the p.Trp43Arg CRYGD mutant and UV-damaged wild-type CRYGD (i.e., in age-related cataract), displaying similar precipitation dynamics in vitro [60]. Rao et al. (2013) [61] demonstrated that UV light, in the later stages of gestation of mouse fetuses, plays a significant role in activating melanopsin-expressing retinal ganglion cells, thus preparing the fetal eye for vision by regulating retinal neuron number. They measured visceral cavity photon flux to be sufficient to activate certain regulating signals for retinal development in the fetal mouse eye [61]. Many studies cover the overall effect of UV radiation in pregnancy, but none indicate the effect of direct UV on the unborn child, let alone the fetal lens. Though UVA (320–400 nm) can penetrate to the dermis [62], it ultimately remains unknown how much UV effectively reaches the human fetal lens. Hence, the UV protective character of conserved Tryptophans in crystallins resembles an observation on the protein basis of these crystallin mutations only.

Table 3.

Previously described disease-causing point mutations in conserved Tryptophans of crystallins.

Gene Exon cDNA Amino Acid Change Coding
Effect
Protein Domain Phenotype Reference
CRYGD Exon 2 NM_006891.4:c.127T>C p.Trp43Arg missense 2nd Greek Key Nuclear CC Wang et al. (2011) [59]; Ji et al. (2013) [60]
CRYBB2 Exon 4 NM_000496.3:c.177G>C p.Trp59Arg missense 2nd Greek Key Total CC Santhiya et al. (2010) [63]; Zhao et al. (2017) [17]
CRYBB2 Exon 6 NM_000496.3:c.451T>C p.Trp151Arg missense 4th Greek key Progressive CC Xu et al. (2021) [64]
CRYBB2 Exon 6 NM_000496.3:c.453G>C p.Trp151Cys missense 4th Greek key Progressive membranous CC Chen et al. (2013) [65]; Zhao et al. (2017) [17]
CRYBB2 Exon 6 NM_000496.3:c.453G>T p.Trp151Cys missense 4th Greek key Nuclear CC Santhiya et al. (2004) [66]

Acronyms: CC, congenital cataract.

Mutations in two conserved Tryptophans were also found to be responsible for CC in β-crystallins like CRYBB2, in which mutations at p.Trp59Arg and p.Trp151Arg/Cys were reported to cause a significant change in the structural integrity and stability of β-crystallin, even more so than γ-crystallins [17,63,64,65,66] (Table 3). Xu et al. (2021) [64] identified a family with progressive cortical CC due to a Trp151Arg mutation in CRYBB2, displaying that the mutant protein increasingly misfolds, exposing hydrophobic side chains in the fourth Greek key, making it prone to aggregate. Interestingly, a complete prevention or reverse effect was described in vitro after lanosterol application to the pTrp151Arg mutant, posing a potential therapy option for CC patients with p.Trp151Arg mutations in CRYBB2 [64]. However, children born with a dense CC may not be the target patient cohort for this approach.

To the best of our knowledge, we describe the first human nuclear CC caused by a novel de novo missense mutation at a highly conserved Tryptophan position, p.Trp131Arg, in the CRYGC gene, hypothesizing a similar disruption in the tertiary structure and solubility and stability dynamics in CRYGC. Functional assays would be necessary to provide conclusive evidence for pathogenicity of this specific variant.

5. Conclusions

We identified a novel de novo missense variant, c.391T>C, within exon 3 in CRYGC causing congenital nuclear cataract in a patient. Our findings expand the current understanding of the range of variants present in CRYGC and contribute crucial insight into the heterogeneity of inherited cataracts in the pediatric population.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the patient and family for their participation and cooperation in this study.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms242316594/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.G.-K. and W.B.; methodology, S.K., C.G.-K. and W.B.; validation, F.D., S.K. and S.F., formal analysis, F.D., S.K. and S.F.; investigation, F.D., S.K. and S.F.; resources, C.G.-K. and W.B.; writing—original draft preparation, F.D.; writing—review and editing, F.D., S.K., C.G.-K., I.D. and W.B.; visualization, F.D.; supervision, S.K., C.G.-K. and W.B.; project administration, C.G.-K. and W.B.; funding acquisition, C.G.-K. and W.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study adhered to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and obtained approval from the Cantonal Ethics Committee of Zurich (Ref-No. 2019-00108, 18 March 2019). Genetic testing on human patients was granted approval by the Federal Office for Public Health (FOPH) in Switzerland and entrusted to the Institute of Medical Molecular Genetics. The legal guardian of the participant was provided with comprehensive and informed explanations regarding the study procedures and their voluntary participation was obtained.

Informed Consent Statement

Signed informed consent was obtained from the legal guardians of the subject involved in the analysis.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no involvement in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, manuscript writing, or the decision to publish the results.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by a grant from the Hedy Glor-Meyer Stiftung of the University Hospital Zurich Foundation.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Jain I.S., Pillay P., Gangwar D.N., Dhir S.P., Kaul V.K. Congenital Cataract: Etiology and Morphology. J. Pediatr. Ophthalmol. Strabismus. 1983;20:238–242. doi: 10.3928/0191-3913-19831101-06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wu X., Long E., Lin H., Liu Y. Prevalence and Epidemiological Characteristics of Congenital Cataract: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:28564. doi: 10.1038/srep28564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Messina-Baas O., Cuevas-Covarrubias S.A. Inherited Congenital Cataract: A Guide to Suspect the Genetic Etiology in the Cataract Genesis. Mol. Syndromol. 2017;8:58–78. doi: 10.1159/000455752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sheeladevi S., Lawrenson J.G., Fielder A.R., Suttle C.M. Global Prevalence of Childhood Cataract: A Systematic Review. Eye. 2016;30:1160–1169. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pichi F., Lembo A., Serafino M., Nucci P. Genetics of Congenital Cataract. Dev. Ophthalmol. 2016;57:1–14. doi: 10.1159/000442495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Reddy M.A., Francis P.J., Berry V., Bhattacharya S.S., Moore A.T. Molecular Genetic Basis of Inherited Cataract and Associated Phenotypes. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2004;49:300–315. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2004.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yi J., Yun J., Li Z.K., Xu C.T., Pan B.R. Epidemiology and Molecular Genetics of Congenital Cataracts. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2011;4:422–432. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2011.04.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Berry V., Georgiou M., Fujinami K., Quinlan R., Moore A., Michaelides M. Inherited Cataracts: Molecular Genetics, Clinical Features, Disease Mechanisms and Novel Therapeutic Approaches. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2020;104:1331–1337. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rechsteiner D., Issler L., Koller S., Lang E., Bähr L., Feil S., Rüegger C.M., Kottke R., Toelle S.P., Zweifel N., et al. Genetic Analysis in a Swiss Cohort of Bilateral Congenital Cataract. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021;139:691–700. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.0385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gillespie R.L., O’Sullivan J., Ashworth J., Bhaskar S., Williams S., Biswas S., Kehdi E., Ramsden S.C., Clayton-Smith J., Black G.C., et al. Personalized Diagnosis and Management of Congenital Cataract by Next-Generation Sequencing. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:2124–2137.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tavtigian S.V., Deffenbaugh A.M., Yin L., Judkins T., Scholl T., Samollow P.B., De Silva D., Zharkikh A., Thomas A. Comprehensive Statistical Study of 452 BRCA1 Missense Substitutions with Classification of Eight Recurrent Substitutions as Neutral. J. Med. Genet. 2006;43:295–305. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2005.033878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jackson D., Malka S., Harding P., Palma J., Dunbar H., Moosajee M. Molecular Diagnostic Challenges for Non-Retinal Developmental Eye Disorders in the United Kingdom. Am. J. Med. Genet. Part C Semin. Med. Genet. 2020;184:578–589. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Peng Y., Zheng Y., Deng Z., Zhang S., Tan Y., Hu Z., Tao L., Luo Y. Case Report: A de Novo Variant of CRYGC Gene Associated with Congenital Cataract and Microphthalmia. Front. Genet. 2022;13:866246. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.866246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shiels A., Hejtmancik J.F. Molecular Genetics of Cataract. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2015;134:203–218. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2015.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Santana A., Waiswol M. The Genetic and Molecular Basis of Congenital Cataract. Arq. Bras. Oftalmol. 2011;74:136–142. doi: 10.1590/S0004-27492011000200016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bloemendal H., De Jong W., Jaenicke R., Lubsen N.H., Slingsby C., Tardieu A. Ageing and Vision: Structure, Stability and Function of Lens Crystallins. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2004;86:407–485. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2003.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhao W.J., Xu J., Chen X.J., Liu H.H., Yao K., Yan Y. Bin Effects of Cataract-Causing Mutations W59C and W151C on ΒB2-Crystallin Structure, Stability and Folding. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017;103:764–770. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chen J., Callis P.R., King J. Mechanism of the Very Efficient Quenching of Tryptophan Fluorescence in Human ΓD- and ΓS-Crystallins: The γ-Crystallin Fold May Have Evolved to Protect Tryptophan Residues from Ultraviolet Photodamage. Biochemistry. 2009;48:3708–3716. doi: 10.1021/bi802177g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Robman L., Taylor H. External Factors in the Development of Cataract. Eye. 2005;19:1074–1082. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Association W.M. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. JAMA. 2013;310:2191–2194. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Haug P., Koller S., Maggi J., Lang E., Feil S., Wlodarczyk A., Bähr L., Steindl K., Rohrbach M., Gerth-Kahlert C., et al. Whole Exome Sequencing in Coloboma/Microphthalmia: Identification of Novel and Recurrent Variants in Seven Genes. Genes. 2021;12:65. doi: 10.3390/genes12010065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lang E., Koller S., Bähr L., Töteberg-Harms M., Atac D., Roulez F., Bahr A., Steindl K., Feil S., Berger W., et al. Exome Sequencing in a Swiss Childhood Glaucoma Cohort Reveals CYP1B1 and FOXC1 Variants as Most Frequent Causes. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 2020;9:47. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.7.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Richards S., Aziz N., Bale S., Bick D., Das S., Gastier-Foster J., Grody W.W., Hegde M., Lyon E., Spector E., et al. Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation of Sequence Variants: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. Off. J. Am. Coll. Med. Genet. 2015;17:405–424. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Blundell T., Lindley P., Miller L., Moss D., Slingsby C., Turnell B., Wistow G. The molecular structure and stability of the eye lens: X-ray Analysis of y-Crystallin II. Nature. 1981;289:773. doi: 10.1038/289771a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Héon E., Priston M., Schorderet D.F., Billingsley G.D., Girard P.O., Lubsen N., Munier F.L. The Gamma-Crystallins and Human Cataracts: A Puzzle Made Clearer. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1999;65:1261–1267. doi: 10.1086/302619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Berry V., Ionides A., Pontikos N., Georgiou M., Yu J., Ocaka L.A., Moore A.T., Quinlan R.A., Michaelides M. The Genetic Landscape of Crystallins in Congenital Cataract. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2020;15:333. doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-01613-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Astiazarán M.C., García-Montaño L.A., Sánchez-Moreno F., Matiz-Moreno H., Zenteno J.C. Next Generation Sequencing-Based Molecular Diagnosis in Familial Congenital Cataract Expands the Mutational Spectrum in Known Congenital Cataract Genes. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2018;176:2637–2645. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.40524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jiao X., Viswanathan M., Bobrova N.F., Romanova T.V., Hejtmancik J.F. Molecular Genetic Analysis of Ukrainian Families with Congenital Cataracts. Child. 2022;10:51. doi: 10.3390/children10010051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhang J., Sun D., Wang Y., Mu W., Peng Y., Mi D. Identification of a novel CRYGC mutation in a pedigree affected with congenital cataracts. Zhonghua Yixue Yichuanxue Zazhi = Chin. J. Med. Genet. 2019;36:697–700. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1003-9406.2019.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fu C., Xu J., Yang X., Chen X., Yao K. Cataract-Causing Mutations L45P and Y46D Impair the Thermal Stability of ΓC-Crystallin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2021;539:70–76. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.12.096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhong Z., Wu Z., Han L., Chen J. Novel Mutations in CRYGC Are Associated with Congenital Cataracts in Chinese Families. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:189. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00318-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kumar M., Agarwal T., Khokhar S., Kumar M., Kaur P., Roy T.S., Dada R. Mutation Screening and Genotype Phenotype Correlation of α-Crystallin, γ-Crystallin and GJA8 Gene in Congenital Cataract. Mol. Vis. 2011;17:693–707. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sun Z., Zhou Q., Li H., Yang L., Wu S., Sui R. Mutations in Crystallin Genes Result in Congenital Cataract Associated with Other Ocular Abnormalities. Mol. Vis. 2017;23:977–986. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Karahan M., Demirtaş A.A., Erdem S., Ava S., Tekeş S., Keklikçi U. Crystalline Gene Mutations in Turkish Children with Congenital Cataracts. Int. Ophthalmol. 2021;41:2847–2852. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-01843-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Moon D., Park H.W., Surl D., Won D., Lee S.T., Shin S., Choi J.R., Han J. Precision Medicine through Next-Generation Sequencing in Inherited Eye Diseases in a Korean Cohort. Genes. 2022;13:27. doi: 10.3390/genes13010027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Li J., Leng Y., Han S., Yan L., Lu C., Luo Y., Zhang X., Cao L. Clinical and Genetic Characteristics of Chinese Patients with Familial or Sporadic Pediatric Cataract. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2018;13:94. doi: 10.1186/s13023-018-0828-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li D., Wang S., Ye H., Tang Y., Qiu X., Fan Q., Rong X., Liu X., Chen Y., Yang J., et al. Distribution of Gene Mutations in Sporadic Congenital Cataract in a Han Chinese Population. Mol. Vis. 2016;22:589–598. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li X.-Q., Cai H.-C., Zhou S.-Y., Yang J.-H., Xi Y.-B., Gao X.-B., Zhao W.-J., Li P., Zhao G.-Y., Tong Y., et al. A Novel Mutation Impairing the Tertiary Structure and Stability of ΓC-Crystallin (CRYGC) Leads to Cataract Formation in Humans and Zebrafish Lens. Hum. Mutat. 2012;33:391–401. doi: 10.1002/humu.21648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Xi Y.-B., Chen X.-J., Zhao W.-J., Yan Y.-B. Congenital Cataract-Causing Mutation G129C in ΓC-Crystallin Promotes the Accumulation of Two Distinct Unfolding Intermediates That Form Highly Toxic Aggregates. J. Mol. Biol. 2015;427:2765–2781. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Prokudin I., Simons C., Grigg J.R., Storen R., Kumar V., Phua Z.Y., Smith J., Flaherty M., Davila S., Jamieson R. V Exome Sequencing in Developmental Eye Disease Leads to Identification of Causal Variants in GJA8, CRYGC, PAX6 and CYP1B1. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2014;22:907–915. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fan F., Luo Y., Wu J., Gao C., Liu X., Mei H., Zhou X. The Mutation Spectrum in Familial versus Sporadic Congenital Cataract Based on Next-Generation Sequencing. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020;20:361. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01567-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ma A.S., Grigg J.R., Ho G., Prokudin I., Farnsworth E., Holman K., Cheng A., Billson F.A., Martin F., Fraser C., et al. Sporadic and Familial Congenital Cataracts: Mutational Spectrum and New Diagnoses Using Next-Generation Sequencing. Hum. Mutat. 2016;37:371–384. doi: 10.1002/humu.22948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Santhiya S.T., Shyam Manohar M., Rawlley D., Vijayalakshmi P., Namperumalsamy P., Gopinath P.M., Löster J., Graw J. Novel Mutations in the Gamma-Crystallin Genes Cause Autosomal Dominant Congenital Cataracts. J. Med. Genet. 2002;39:352–358. doi: 10.1136/jmg.39.5.352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gonzalez-Huerta L.M., Messina-Baas O.M., Cuevas-Covarrubias S.A. A Family with Autosomal Dominant Primary Congenital Cataract Associated with a CRYGC Mutation: Evidence of Clinical Heterogeneity. Mol. Vis. 2007;13:1333–1338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Devi R.R., Yao W., Vijayalakshmi P., Sergeev Y.V., Sundaresan P., Hejtmancik J.F. Crystallin Gene Mutations in Indian Families with Inherited Pediatric Cataract. Mol. Vis. 2008;14:1157–1170. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yao K., Jin C., Zhu N., Wang W., Wu R., Jiang J., Shentu X. A Nonsense Mutation in CRYGC Associated with Autosomal Dominant Congenital Nuclear Cataract in a Chinese Family. Mol. Vis. 2008;14:1272–1276. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kandaswamy D.K., Vasantha K., Graw J., Santhiya S.T. A Novel CRYGC E128* Mutation Underlying an Autosomal Dominant Nuclear Cataract in a South Indian Kindred. Ophthalmic Genet. 2020;41:556–562. doi: 10.1080/13816810.2020.1807027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Patel N., Anand D., Monies D., Maddirevula S., Khan A.O., Algoufi T., Alowain M., Faqeih E., Alshammari M., Qudair A., et al. Novel Phenotypes and Loci Identified through Clinical Genomics Approaches to Pediatric Cataract. Hum. Genet. 2017;136:205–225. doi: 10.1007/s00439-016-1747-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Reis L.M., Tyler R.C., Muheisen S., Raggio V., Salviati L., Han D.P., Costakos D., Yonath H., Hall S., Power P., et al. Whole Exome Sequencing in Dominant Cataract Identifies a New Causative Factor, CRYBA2, and a Variety of Novel Alleles in Known Genes. Hum. Genet. 2013;132:761–770. doi: 10.1007/s00439-013-1289-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Taylan Sekeroglu H., Karaosmanoglu B., Taskiran E.Z., Simsek Kiper P.O., Alikasifoglu M., Boduroglu K., Coskun T., Utine G.E. Molecular Etiology of Isolated Congenital Cataract Using Next-Generation Sequencing: Single Center Exome Sequencing Data from Turkey. Mol. Syndromol. 2020;11:302–308. doi: 10.1159/000510481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zhang L., Fu S., Ou Y., Zhao T., Su Y., Liu P. A Novel Nonsense Mutation in CRYGC Is Associated with Autosomal Dominant Congenital Nuclear Cataracts and Microcornea. Mol. Vis. 2009;15:276–282. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kessel L., Bach-Holm D., Al-Bakri M., Roos L., Lund A., Grønskov K. Genetic Disease Is a Common Cause of Bilateral Childhood Cataract in Denmark. Ophthalmic Genet. 2021;42:650–658. doi: 10.1080/13816810.2021.1941128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Guo Y., Su D., Li Q., Yang Z., Ma Z., Ma X., Zhu S. A Nonsense Mutation of CRYGC Associated with Autosomal Dominant Congenital Nuclear Cataracts and Microcornea in a Chinese Pedigree. Mol. Vis. 2012;18:1874–1880. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Zhuang J., Cao Z., Zhu Y., Liu L., Tong Y., Chen X., Wang Y., Lu C., Ma X., Yang J. Mutation Screening of Crystallin Genes in Chinese Families with Congenital Cataracts. Mol. Vis. 2019;25:427–437. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ren Z., Li A., Shastry B.S., Padma T., Ayyagari R., Scott M.H., Parks M.M., Kaiser-Kupfer M.I., Hejtmancik J.F. A 5-Base Insertion in the GammaC-Crystallin Gene Is Associated with Autosomal Dominant Variable Zonular Pulverulent Cataract. Hum. Genet. 2000;106:531–537. doi: 10.1007/s004390000289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kondo Y., Saitsu H., Miyamoto T., Lee B.J., Nishiyama K., Nakashima M., Tsurusaki Y., Doi H., Miyake N., Kim J.H., et al. Pathogenic Mutations in Two Families with Congenital Cataract Identified with Whole-Exome Sequencing. Mol. Vis. 2013;19:384–389. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zhou Z., Zhao L., Guo Y., Zhuang J., Zhuo N., Chen H., Liu J., Wang L. A Novel Mutation in CRYGC Mutation Associated with Autosomal Dominant Congenital Cataracts and Microcornea. Ophthalmol. Sci. 2022;2:100093. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2021.100093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Fernández-Alcalde C., Nieves-Moreno M., Noval S., Peralta J.M., Montaño V.E.F., Del Pozo Á., Santos-Simarro F., Vallespín E. Molecular and Genetic Mechanism of Non-Syndromic Congenital Cataracts. Mutation Screening in Spanish Families. Genes. 2021;12:580. doi: 10.3390/genes12040580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wang B., Yu C., Xi Y.B., Cai H.C., Wang J., Zhou S., Zhou S., Wu Y., Yan Y.B., Ma X., et al. A Novel CRYGD Mutation (p.Trp43Arg) Causing Autosomal Dominant Congenital Cataract in a Chinese Family. Hum. Mutat. 2011;32:1939–1947. doi: 10.1002/humu.21386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ji F., Jungs J., Koharudin L.M.I., Gronenborn A.M. The Human W42R ΓD-Crystallin Mutant Structure Provides a Link between Congenital and Age-Related Cataracts. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:99–109. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.416354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Rao S., Chun C., Fan J., Kofron J.M., Yang M.B., Hegde R.S., Ferrara N., Copenhagen D.R., Lang R.A. A Direct and Melanopsin-Dependent Fetal Light Response Regulates Mouse Eye Development. Nature. 2013;494:243–246. doi: 10.1038/nature11823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Pérez-Sánchez A., Barrajón-Catalán E., Herranz-López M., Micol V. Nutraceuticals for Skin Care: A Comprehensive Review of Human Clinical Studies. Nutrients. 2018;10:403. doi: 10.3390/nu10040403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Santhiya S.T., Kumar G.S., Sudhakar P., Gupta N., Klopp N., Illig T., Söker T., Groth M., Platzer M., Gopinath P.M., et al. Molecular Analysis of Cataract Families in India: New Mutations in the CRYBB2 and GJA3 Genes and Rare Polymorphisms. Mol. Vis. 2010;16:1837–1847. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Xu J., Wang H., Wang A., Xu J., Fu C., Jia Z., Yao K., Chen X. ΒB2 W151R Mutant Is Prone to Degradation, Aggregation and Exposes the Hydrophobic Side Chains in the Fourth Greek Key Motif. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Mol. Basis Dis. 2021;1867:166018. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2020.166018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Chen W., Chen X., Hu Z., Lin H., Zhou F., Luo L., Zhang X., Zhong X., Yang Y., Wu C., et al. A Missense Mutation in CRYBB2 Leads to Progressive Congenital Membranous Cataract by Impacting the Solubility and Function of ΒB2-Crystallin. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e81290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Santhiya S.T., Manisastry S.M., Rawlley D., Malathi R., Anishetty S., Gopinath P.M., Vijayalakshmi P., Namperumalsamy P., Adamski J., Graw J. Mutation Analysis of Congenital Cataracts in Indian Families: Identification of SNPs and a New Causative Allele in CRYBB2 Gene. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2004;45:3599–3607. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.


Articles from International Journal of Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES