Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2023 Oct 18;11(6):e00492-23. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00492-23

Vibrio parahaemolyticus becomes lethal to post-larvae shrimp via acquiring novel virulence factors

Shuang Liu 1,2,3, Wei Wang 1,2, Tianchang Jia 1,2, Lusheng Xin 1,2,3, Ting-ting Xu 1,2,3, Chong Wang 1,2, Guosi Xie 1,2,3, Kun Luo 1,2, Jun Li 4, Jie Kong 1,2,3, Qingli Zhang 1,2,3,
Editor: Philip N Rather5
PMCID: PMC10714935  PMID: 37850796

ABSTRACT

Translucent post-larvae disease (TPD), caused by Vibrio parahaemolyticus (Vp TPD), has become an emerging shrimp disease, affecting more than 70%–80% of coastal shrimp nurseries in China in spring 2020. Here, we investigated the key virulence factors of Vp TPD by analyzing protein fragments, related genomic information, as well as experimental challenge tests. After investigating the toxic effects of purified protein fragments with different molecular weights (MWs) from Vp TPD, we found that only the protein fragments with MW >100 kDa showed similar lethality to live Vp TPD in the experimental challenge test using post-larvae shrimp. Meanwhile, similar histopathological changes exhibiting in the hepatopancreas and midgut of the diseased individuals were observed in the post-larvae shrimp challenged with either bacterial protein fragments (MW >100 kDa) or live Vp TPD. Based on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and mass spectrometry analyses, two novel proteins, Vibrio high virulent protein (VHVP)-1 and VHVP-2, were identified as the candidates of key virulence factors to cause TPD. Moreover, VHVP-1 and VHVP-2 were found to be encoded by two genes (vhvp-1 and vhvp-2) tandemly located on a 187,791-bp plasmid and were predicted to depend on the same promoter following a comparative genomic analysis. Further epidemiological investigation and challenge test indicated that the V. parahaemolyticus isolate carrying only the vhvp-1 gene and lacking vhvp-2 gene could not cause mortality of experimental Penaeus vannamei post-larvae. The mutant (Δvhvp-2) by deleting vhvp-2 gene could only cause 4.92% of accumulative mortality of post-larvae that is similar to the non-Vp TPD Vibrio strain. Additionally, the complemented strains, Δvhvp-2/pBT3-vhvp-2 and Δvhvp-2/pwtCas9-vhvp-2, showed similar virulence to the wild-type Vp TPD. The results demonstrated that V. parahaemolyticus becomes lethal to post-larval shrimp by acquiring the VHVP-2 virulence factor. This study sheds light on further investigations of the pathogenic mechanism of Vp TPD and the development of strategies for early diagnosis of TPD in shrimp hatcheries.

IMPORTANCE

As a severe emerging shrimp disease, TPD has heavily impacted the shrimp aquaculture industry and resulted in serious economic losses in China since spring 2020. This study aimed to identify the key virulent factors and related genes of the Vp TPD, for a better understanding of its pathogenicity of the novel highly lethal infectious pathogen, as well as its molecular epidemiological characteristics in China. The present study revealed that a novel protein, Vibrio high virulent protein-2 (MW >100 kDa), is responsible to the lethal virulence of V. parahaemolyticus to shrimp post-larvae. The results are essential for effectively diagnosing and monitoring novel pathogenic bacteria, like Vp TPD, in aquaculture shrimps and would be beneficial to the fisheries department in early warning of Vp TPD emergence and developing prevention strategies to reduce economic losses due to severe outbreaks of TPD. Elucidation of the key virulence genes and genomics of Vp TPD could also provide valuable information on the evolution and ecology of this emerging pathogen in aquaculture environments.

KEYWORDS: translucent post-larvae disease (TPD), Vibrio parahaemolyticus-causing TPD (Vp TPD), shrimp, novel virulence factor, Vibrio high virulent protein (VHVP)


From late 2019 to early 2020, a new shrimp disease called translucent post-larvae disease (TPD) or glass post-larvae disease appeared in the southern coastal provinces of China. TPD became more and more prevalent in shrimp post-larvae, causing collapse of 70%–80% coastal shrimp nurseries in China in the spring of 2020 (1 3). A highly virulent Vibrio parahaemolyticus strain (Vp-JS20200428004-2) was identified as the responsible pathogen for the infectious TPD and was provisionally named as V. parahaemolyticus causing TPD, or Vp TPD (4). Vp TPD was highly lethal in particular to post-larvae at 4–7 days old (PL4–PL7). The cumulative mortality of the infected post-larvae could reach up to 100% in 3 days in a typical disease case. The infected shrimp post-larvae exhibited typical clinical syndromes, such as pale or colorless hepatopancreas and empty digestive tract, which made the diseased individuals to become transparent and translucent; therefore, these diseased individuals were named “translucent post-larvae” or “glass post-larvae” by local farmers (4).

Vp TPD infection in the Penaeus vannamei post-larvae could cause obvious histopathological changes that are similar to some degree to those of acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease (AHPND). The epithelial cells of hepatopancreatic tubules and midgut were necrotic and sloughed off. A large number of colonized bacteria could be observed in hepatopancreas and midgut under microscope (4). Whereas, the toxicity of Vp TPD (vp-HL-202005) to the post-larvae of P. vannamei was about 1,000 times higher than that of the V. parahaemolyticus strain causing AHPND (3).

Until 2023, the prevalence of TPD was still common in P. vannamei nurseries and farms in the coastal provinces of China. Even though some antibiotics were reported to be able to kill or inhibit Vp TPD, the demand of antibiotic-free shrimp production prompted the high preference of biosecurity measures, including early detection and disinfection treatment to prevent the occurrence and prevalence of the TPD. Therefore, there is an urgent need to investigate the key virulence factor of Vp TPD for developing effective diagnostic techniques and further prevention strategies of TPD.

In the present study, we first carried out investigations for the key virulent proteins with different molecular weights that contribute to the pathogenicity of Vp TPD to P. vannamei post-larvae via experimental challenge tests. Then, the virulent protein fragments as potential virulence factors of Vp TPD were characterized by mass spectrometry and genome sequencing. Meanwhile, we also investigated the presence of Vibrio high virulent protein (VHVP) virulence factor in different Vibrio isolates as well as its occurrence in the TPD cases in different shrimp farms from different geographical areas of China. The results of our current study should shed insights into the molecular pathogenic mechanisms of Vp TPD in P. vannamei post-larvae.

RESULTS

Inactivation of Vp TPD

We first tested the effect of thermal inactivation and ultrasonic disruption to inactivate Vp TPD. The culture of Vp TPD (7.1 × 10E8 CFU/mL) was treated for inactivation by different combinations of two methods, ultrasonic disruption (U) and heating (H) at 65°C for 45 min. The lysate protein extract obtained by ultrasonic disruption of Vp TPD (>100 kDa) was inactivated too. The viability of inactivated Vp TPD was tested by inoculating different treatments onto agar plates, and no bacteria grew on the plates from the treatment groups of Vp TPD + U and H, Vp TPD + U and H (>100 kDa), and Vp TPD + U (>100 kDa), which indicated that Vp TPD could be effectively inactivated via various combination methods of sonication and pasteurization in the present study.

Pathogenicity of the candidate virulence factors of Vp TPD determined by the challenge test

The cumulative mortality rates of challenged P. vannamei post-larvae with both live Vp TPD and its protein fractions with different molecular weights are shown in Fig. 1b. During a 40-h experimental period, no death occurred in the negative control (NC) group; however, dead post-larval shrimps in the group challenged with 7.1 × 105 CFU/mL of Vp TPD were observed at 8 h, and the mortality reached 100% after 24 h of challenge. The mortality of shrimps in the group of Vp TPD + U (>100 kDa) began at 16 h post of challenge and then reached 90% after 32 h. In contrast, the cumulative mortality of post-larvae in all the groups of Vp TPD + U (50–100 kDa), Vp TPD + U (30–50 kDa), Vp TPD + U (10–30 kDa), and Vp TPD + U (<10 kDa) did not exceed 10% even after 32 h of challenge (Fig. 1b). The results indicated that only Vp TPD + U (>100 kDa) proteins showed a similar virulent effects to P. vannamei post-larvae as live Vp TPD, which means the efficient virulence factors of Vp TPD should be in the fraction (MW >100 kDa) of the lysate protein extract by ultrasonic disruption of Vp TPD + U.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Pathogenicity analysis of Vp TPD proteins of different molecular weights to Penaeus vannamei post-larvae. (a) Schematic of the protocols used to obtain Vp TPD proteins of different molecular weights. (b) Cumulative mortality of P. vannamei post-larvae induced by different molecular weights of Vp TPD proteins in the immersion challenge test. Each group contained three experimental tanks as three replicates. For each replicate, 15 shrimps were challenged by immersion with 1× PBS buffer (negative control), live Vp TPD (positive control), and the proteins of Vp TPD with different molecular weights (Vp TPD + U [>100 kDa], Vp TPD + U [50–100 kDa], Vp TPD + U [30–50 kDa], Vp TPD + U [10–30 kDa], Vp TPD + U[(<10 kDa]), respectively. Cumulative mortality of shrimp was shown as the mean and SD of three replicate data for each experimental group. For each replicate, healthy shrimps were immersed in a concentration of 7.1 × 105 CFU/mL live Vp TPD (infected group) or in a concentration of protein fractions with different molecular weights extracted from 7.1 × 105 CFU/mL Vp TPD. (c) Histopathological photographs of hepatopancreas and intestine of P. vannamei post-larvae from the live Vp TPD-challenged group (positive control) and 1× PBS-challenged group (negative control). (d) Histopathological photographs of hepatopancreas and intestine of P. vannamei post-larvae from Vp TPD + U (>100 kDa) challenged group at different time points post infection (including 8 hpi, 16 hpi, 24 hpi, 32 hpi, and 40 hpi).

Histopathological analysis of samples from different challenged groups

Histopathological examination revealed severe necrosis and sloughing of epithelial cells in both hepatopancreatic tubules and midgut of the infected post-larvae with live Vp TPD at 24 h post challenge (Fig. 1c). In the group challenged with Vp TPD + U (>100 kDa), mild necrosis and sloughing of epithelial cells were observed in both hepatopancreatic tubules and midgut at 16 and 24 h post challenge, and severe necrosis and sloughing of epithelial cells occurred at 32 and 40 h post challenge (Fig. 1d); the most severe histopathological changes were seen in the midgut at 32 h post challenge, and severe necrosis of epithelial cells causes epithelial cells to fall off the basement membrane of the midgut and scatter into the cavity of the midgut (Fig. 1d). In contrast, there were no obvious histopathological changes in the hepatopancreatic tubules and midgut of the post-larval individuals from the control group (Fig. 1c).

Identification of Vp TPD virulence factors by SDS-PAGE and mass spectrometry analysis

To screen the candidate virulence factors from this ultrasonic disruption lysate protein extract with molecular weight >100 kDa in Vp TPD, the SDS-PAGE analysis showed three bands representing three major proteins in the Vp TPD + U portion (MW >100 kDa) (Fig. 2a). The three bands, designated as Vp TPD_4-2-1, Vp TPD_4-2-2, Vp TPD_4-2-3, were then excised from the gel and projected for further analysis by using a mass spectrometer and were identified as insecticidal toxin complex protein (GenBank: WP_269169668.1), virulence protein (GenBank: APX09935.1) (Fig. 2b and c), and aconitate hydratase B (GenBank: KIT24301.1), respectively. Finally, both Vp TPD_4-2-1 and Vp TPD_4-2-2 were selected as the candidate virulence factors I and II of Vp TPD for further analysis, and Vp TPD_4-2-3 was excluded from subsequent analyses, as aconitate hydratase B is not a virulence protein according to previous reports.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

SDS-PAGE and mass spectrometry analysis of Vp TPD. (a) Schematic of protein sample analysis of Vp TPD. (b) Vp TPD proteins revealed by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis. Lane 1, Vp TPD; lane M, protein molecular weight marker (kDa). The major proteins in Vp TPD with molecular weights >100 kDa, Vp TPD_4-2-1, Vp TPD_4-2-2, and Vp TPD_4-2-3, were identified as insecticidal toxin complex protein (GenBank: WP_269169668.1), virulence protein (GenBank: APX09935.1), and aconitate hydratase B (GenBank: KIT24301.1), respectively. (c) Identification of Vp TPD virulence proteins by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis. Sequences in red font are the peptide sequences identified by mass spectrometry. (d) Identification of Vp TPD proteins by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis. Part of the secondary mass spectrum of the sequence in red font.

Genome sequencing and comparative genome analysis of Vp TPD and non-Vp TPD strains

To better understand the genetic information of the virulence factors of Vp TPD, a comparative genome analysis of Vp TPD and non-Vp TPD strains was carried out, and sequencing results showed that the complete genome of Vp TPD consisted of two circular chromosomes (Fig. 3a) and three plasmids (Fig. 3c). The two circular chromosomes are 3,527,627 bp (chromosome 1) and 1,887,516 bp (chromosome 2) in length, respectively. The three plasmids of Vp TPD are 212,543 bp, 187,791 bp, and 60,506 bp, respectively. Whereas, the complete genome of the non-Vp TPD strain (Vp 1616) consisted of two circular chromosomes (Fig. 3b) and without plasmids. The two circular chromosomes are 3,288,162 bp (chromosome 1) and 1,923,178 bp (chromosome 2), respectively. The comparative analysis of genomic information between Vp TPD and Vp 1616 demonstrated that two putative virulent factor genes (GE005140 and GE005139) only presented in the Vp TPD but not in Vp 1616. According to the results of multiple sequence alignment using the online Blastx program on the NCBI web, the two putative virulent factor genes (GE005140 and GE005139) were found to encode the deduced candidate virulence factors I and II, which shared 100% and 99.49% amino acid sequences identity with the insecticidal toxin protein (GenBank: WP_269169668.1) and the virulence protein (GenBank: APX09935.1), respectively.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Circular genome and plamid maps of chromosomes of Vp TPD and Vp 1616, and domain structure of gene vhvp-1 and vhvp-2 of Vp TPD. (a) Circular genome maps of chromosome 1 and chromosome 2 of Vp TPD. From inner to outer, the first circle represents the genomic length in 5 kb; the second and third circles represent the COG function category of the protein-coding sequence on the forward and reverse strands, respectively; the fourth circle represents the repetitive sequence; the fifth circle represents tRNA and rRNA, blue is tRNA, and purple is rRNA; the sixth circle represents the GC content; the innermost circle is the GC skew, dark gray represents the area where the G content is greater than C, and the red represents the area where the C content is greater than G. (b) Circular genome maps of chromosome 1 and chromosome 2 of Vp 1616. The outermost circle represents the positional coordinates of the genome sequence. From outside to inside, they are coding genes, gene function annotation results (including COG, KOG, eggNOG, KEGG, and GO database annotation results information), ncRNA, genome GC content, and genome GC skew value distribution. Circular genome maps of chromosome 1 and chromosome 2 of Vp 1616. The outermost circle represents the positional coordinates of the genome sequence. From outside to inside, they are coding genes, gene function annotation results (including COG, KOG, eggNOG, KEGG, and GO database annotation result information), ncRNA, genome GC content, and genome GC skew value distribution. (c) Circular maps of plasmid 1, plasmid 2, and plasmid 3 of Vp TPD. From inner to outer, the first circle represents the genomic length in 5 kb; the second and third circles represent the COG function category of the protein-coding sequence on the forward and reverse strand, respectively; the fourth circle represents the repetitive sequence; the fifth circle represents tRNA and rRNA, where blue is tRNA, and purple is rRNA; the sixth circle represents the GC content; the innermost circle is the GC skew, dark gray represents the area where the G content is greater than C, and the red represents the area where the C content is greater than G. (d) Genome map of plasmid 2 (187,791 bp) of Vp TPD. The black circle represents the position of the putative virulence genes of vhvp-1 (GE005140) and vhvp-2 (GE005139) in the genome. (e) The deduced conserved domain structure of the proteins encoded by vhvp-1 and vhvp-2 in plasmid 2. VRP1 super family, Salmonella virulence plasmid 28.1 kDa A protein; Neuramin, neuraminidase-like domain; TcA, TcA receptorbinding domain; TcA_TcB_BD, Tc toxin complex TcA C-terminal TcB-binding domain. SpvB, Salmonella virulence plasmid 65 kDa B protein; TcdB, bacterial insecticide toxin TcdB.

Sequence characterization of the unique virulence factors of Vp TPD

Based on the comparative genomic and mass spectrometry analysis, two putative virulent proteins of Vp TPD_4-2-1 and Vp TPD_4-2-2, which were encoded by GE005140 and GE005139 in Vp TPD, respectively, were named as putative VHVP-1 and VHVP-2. The genes of GE005140 (vhvp-1) and GE005139 (vhvp-2) were found to be tandemly located on a 187,791-bp plasmid of the Vp TPD genome and are predicted to depend on the same promoter in the plasmid by using the classic bacterial sigma70 promoter recognition program. According to the open reading frame (ORF ) finder analysis (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/orffinder/) of the vhvp genes, VHVP-1 was composed of 2,544 amino acid residues, with a predicted molecular mass of 283.37 kDa and a predicted pI of 4.69, and VHVP-2 was composed of 1,421 amino acid residues, with a predicted molecular mass of 161.34 kDa and a predicted pI of 4.63. Prediction by the online Conserved Domain Search Service (CD Search) in NCBI revealed that VHVP-1 possessed the conserved domains of Tc toxin complex TcA C-terminal TcB-binding domain (Pfam ID: CL39627), TcA receptor-binding domain (Pfam ID: CL139842.1), neuraminidase-like domain (Pfam ID: pfam18413), and Salmonella virulence plasmid 28.1 kDa A protein (Pfam ID: CL21676) (Fig. 3e). Meanwhile, VHVP-2 was found to contain the conserved domains of Salmonella virulence plasmid 65 kDa B protein (SpvB, Pfam ID: pfam03534), insecticide toxin TcdB middle/C-terminal region (Pfam ID: pfam12255), and insecticide toxin TcdB middle/N-terminal region domain (Pfam ID: cl13663) (Fig. 3e). VHVP-1 and VHVP-2 shared 45.16%–99.49% and 71.85%–100% overall sequence identity with other bacterial virulence factors, respectively.

Detection of Vp TPD by PCR

In order to develop a PCR detection method for Vp TPD, PCR primers were designed for targeting vhvp-1 and vhvp-2 genes (Fig. 4a; Table 3). Both DNA samples from the Vp TPD isolate and shrimp tissues suffered with TPD could be amplified and produced 362, 351, and 303 bp amplicons using the Vp TPD-vhvp-1-F1/R1, Vp TPD-vhvp-2-F1/R1, and Vp TPD-vhvp-2-F2/R2 primer sets, respectively (Fig. 4a). Specificity analysis of the primers was performed by using DNA samples from the non-Vp TPD strains, including V. parahaemolyticus-0421B, Pseudoalteromonas flavipulchra (CDM8), V. parahaemolyticus causing AHPND (Vp AHPND, 20200610006-16), V. alginolyticus (20150606001-2), V. harveyi (20170902102-3), V. owensii (20150709001-2), and V. campbellii (20150606027-2). The results showed that no expected PCR products were amplified when using DNA from non-Vp TPD strains as templates, which indicated that the PCR primer sets are only specific for Vp TPD (Fig. 4b).

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Sites schematic of PCR primers of Vp TPD virulence factor genes and the molecular epidemiological analysis based on vhvp gene of Vp TPD. (a) Schematic of the Vp TPD virulence factor (vhvp) gene vhvp-1 and vhvp-2 and the detection primers targeting the vhvp genes. (b) Electrophoretogram of molecular detection of the vhvp genes encoding the conserved domain of TcdA in vhvp-1 gene, SpvB and TcdB in vhvp-2 gene in different marine pathogens. Lane 1, Vp TPD; lane 2, Vibrio parahaemolyticus-0421B; lane 3, Pseudoalteromonas (CDM8); lane 4, Vibrio parahaemolyticus causing AHPND (20200610006-16); lane 5, Vibrio alginolyticus (20150606001-2); lane 6, Vibrio harveyi (20170902102-3); lane 7, Vibrio owensii (20150709001-2); lane 8, Vibrio campbellii (20150606027-2); lane M, molecular weight marker (bp). (c) Vp TPD prevalence in different shrimp aquaculture regions with different prevalence rates (left). Vp TPD prevalence rates in different sampling province in the TPD epidemiological survey (right). Shrimp samples were collected from the shrimp farms in Hebei, Shandong, Jiangsu, Hainan, Xinjiang, Hunan, Hubei, and Guangdong provinces of China from April, 2020 to 2021. Vp TPD prevalence rates in the histogram only represent the positive detection rate of the vhvp-2 gene in the collected samples and not the actual prevalence condition of the TPD in the local areas. The map in panel C was created using ArcGIS 10.4.

Epidemiological analysis of Vp TPD

A total number of 179 shrimp samples were collected from different shrimp farms in China. Field epidemiological investigations and laboratory histopathological analyses revealed that the TPD occurred in shrimp farms in Hebei, Shandong, Jiangsu, Hainan, and Xinjiang provinces (Fig. 4c). All DNA samples extracted from 179 shrimp samples were subjected to molecular epidemiological investigations using the specific Vp TPD PCR assay. The PCR results showed that the targeted vhvp-1 (containing VRP1, neuraminidase, and TcA domains) and vhvp-2 gene (containing SpvB and TcdB domains) could only be amplified in the shrimp samples with typical TPD cases but not from the healthy or non-TPD shrimp samples (Fig. 4c). In addition, the V. parahaemolyticus isolate 20211213002-3 that was isolated from shrimp farm in Hunan Province and carry only the vhvp-1 gene but no vhvp-2 gene could not cause mortality of experimental P. vannamei post-larvae in the challenge test (Fig. 5a). The results showed that the vhvp-2 gene, rather than the vhvp-1 gene, is the actual key virulence gene in the Vp TPD.

Fig 5.

Fig 5

Identifying the key virulence factor of Vp TPD. (a) Cumulative mortality of Penaeus vannamei post-larvae immersed in NC, Vp TPD, and Vibrio parahaemolyticus strain 20211213002-3. P. vannamei post-larvae were immersed with the wild-type Vibrio parahaemolyticus strain Vp TPD carrying vhvp-2 gene or the Vibrio parahaemolyticus strain 20211213002-3 lacking vhvp-2 gene at the same pathogen dose. Shrimps were monitored daily for mortality. Cumulative shrimp mortality was shown as the average mean and SD of two replicate data for each experimental group. (b) Cumulative mortality of P. vannamei post-larvae immersed in NC, Vp TPD, Δvhvp-2, Δvhvp-2/pwtCas9-vhvp-2, and Δvhvp-2/pBT3-vhvp-2. The post-larvae of P. vannamei were immersed with Vp TPD, the vhvp-2 gene deletion mutant ∆vhvp-2, or the vhvp-2 gene complement strain Δvhvp-2/pwtCas9-vhvp-2 and Δvhvp-2/pBT3-vhvp-2 at the same pathogen dose. Shrimps were monitored daily for mortality. Cumulative mortality of shrimp was shown as the average mean and SD of three replicate data for each experimental group. (c) Schematic of the procedures used to identify the key virulence factor of Vp TPD.

Confirmation of the key virulence factor of Vp TPD

The nucleotide sequence of the coding sequences (CDS) of the vhvp-2 gene shared 100% to 71.85% sequence identity with its homologs in Vibrio campbellii, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Photobacterium damselae, Vibrio owensii, Photobacterium iliopiscarium, Aliivibrio fischeri, Yersinia ruckeri, and Enterobacter asburiae. To confirm the key virulence factor of Vp TPD, an isogenic mutant of Vp TPD (∆vhvp-2) was constructed. And in the ∆vhvp-2, including the entire insecticide toxin TcdB middle/N-terminal region domain, from the 106th amino acid residue of conserved domain of the Salmonella virulence plasmid 65 kDa B protein to the 79th residue of the conserved domain of the insecticide toxin TcdB middle/C-terminal region was successfully deleted. The lethal effects of ∆vhvp-2 and Vp TPD to post-larval shrimp were compared by experimental challenge, and the results showed that at the same dose of pathogen, Vp TPD caused 81.89% mortality at 32 h post challenge, ∆vhvp-2 caused 4.92% mortality, while the negative control caused no death (Fig. 5b). The cumulative mortality induced by Vp TPD was significantly different from that of ∆vhvp-2 and NC. Furthermore, the mortality induced by NC was significantly lower than the two complement strains Δvhvp-2/pBT3-vhvp-2 and Δvhvp-2/pwtCas9-vhvp-2, and the wild-type Vp TPD (Fig. 5b). The results indicate that the protein of VHVP-2 is key to the pathogenic effect of Vp TPD, and therefore it was considered as the key virulence factor of Vp TPD.

DISCUSSIONS

TPD, a new emerging disease mainly affecting the post-larvae of shrimp with typical syndromes of pale or colorless hepatopancreas and digestive tract, had become an urgent threat to the shrimp farming industry in China (4). In a recent study, a novel V. parahaemolyticus (Vp TPD) was confirmed as the causative agent of the emerging TPD based on the isolation, identification, and testing of the pathogenic agent, according to the four criteria of Koch’s postulates (4). However, the pathogenic mechanism of Vp TPD was not fully understood yet, which limited the effective prevention and control of Vp TPD in actual shrimp farming practice. In this study, we carried out in-depth investigations, including immersion challenge tests, mass spectrometry analysis, histopathological analysis, and comparative genomic analysis, in order to identify the specific virulence factors of Vp TPD causing translucent post-larvae disease in P. vannamei. The results showed that novel toxin protein, designated as VHVP-2 (MW >100 kDa), containing the conserved domains of Salmonella virulence plasmid protein, insecticidal toxin complex protein, and neuraminidase, was the key virulence factor of Vp TPD (Fig. 5c).

The immersion challenge tests in the present study showed that a specific protein fraction, in which MW >100 kDa from the lysate of Vp TPD, could cause a similar lethality to the shrimp post-larvae as the live pure culture of Vp TPD. This result initially indicated that the virulence factor of Vp TPD should be in the protein fraction with MW >100 kDa. In addition, the supernatant of Vp TPD culture did not show any significant virulent effects to shrimp post-larvae in comparison to that of PBS in our experimental challenge tests, which indicated that the key virulent protein of Vp TPD was likely not secretory (data not shown) under the cultured condition of the present study. Previous studies reported that SDS-PAGE and mass spectrometry analysis have been widely applied for the identification of bacteria virulent proteins with different sizes. For example, PirA- and PirB-like proteins of 13 kDa and 50 kDa were identified as the virulence factor of Vp AHPND by SDS-PAGE and LC-MS/MS in the investigation of the shrimp pathogen of AHPND (5). In addition, proteomic analysis using LC-MS/MS was also applied to elucidate the pathogenesis of Edwardsiella tarda (6) as well as to map lysine acetylation sites in revealing their virulent role in V. alginolyticus (7). Similarly, SDS-PAGE and mass spectrometry analysis were also successfully applied in the present study to identify virulent proteins of Vp TPD. Among three major protein fragments (MW >100 kDa) in Vp TPD based on SDS-PAGE analysis, two of them (Vp TPD_4-2-1 and Vp TPD_4-2-2) were found to share high sequence similarity with the known virulence factor by mass spectrometry analysis, and they were determined to be the candidate virulence factor of Vp TPD. Interestingly, the highly homologous proteins of the candidate virulence protein of Vp TPD, including WP_269169668.1 and APX09935.1, were submitted to NCBI GenBank by other researchers in 2017, suggesting that the strains carrying them should have started to spread in some areas of the world before 2017 or earlier. Regarding the bacteria strains carrying the homologous virulent protein, their distribution, transmission mode, and their pathogenic effects to aquatic animals are worthy of further investigation.

It has been well recognized that the methodologies, such as genome sequencing, comparative genomic analysis, and proteomic analysis, play crucial roles in investigating the pathogenesis of AHPND in shrimp (8 11). For example, genome sequence analysis was used to reveal two virulence genes (pirA- and pirB-like) of VpAHPND in the plasmid pVA1 of VpAHPND (8, 10, 12, 13), and proteomic analysis confirmed the pir toxin-like proteins encoded by the two genes (5). Moreover, comparative genome analysis further addressed that the virulence genes carrying the transferable plasmids not only exist in VpAHPND but also in other non-V. parahaemolyticus AHPND strains and also contribute to its pathogenesis (13 15). For example, a draft genome sequence showed that a V. harveyi isolate could cause AHPND in shrimp in northern Vietnam (16). Studies showed that plasmid-mediated interspecies transfer of the hazard genes could have occurred in different Vibrio species, including V. parahaemolyticus, V. campbellii, and V. owensii (17, 18) and that conjugative transfer of the AHPND-causing pVA1-type plasmid carrying the hazard genes is mediated by a novel self-encoded type IV secretion system (19). Such methodologies provide direct guidelines for uncovering the virulence factors and pathogenic mechanism of Vp TPD. Our current study based on the abovementioned methods demonstrated that the plasmid containing the virulent vhvp gene of Vp TPD also carried traG, traE, traB, traC, and other binding transfer-related genes (data not shown), indicating that the virulence gene of vhvp in Vp TPD might be able to transfer via conjugation among different Vibrio species. Our recent nationwide epidemiological surveys (the data are not shown) also revealed that the vhvp gene was identified in a variety of dominant Vibrio species, including V. natriformis, V. Campbellii, and V. alginolyticus, which were isolated from diseased shrimps with typical TPD symptoms. Our findings suggest that TPD was caused by different pathogens carrying the same transferable vhvp genes, and therefore we need to pay more attention on the Vp TPD for its higher risk of horizontal transmission.

The conjoint analysis of mass spectrometry, complete genome sequencing, and comparative genome of Vp TPD indicated the amino acid sequence of the two potential virulence factors of Vp TPD (Vp TPD_4-2-1 and Vp TPD_4-2-2) annotated by mass spectrometry analysis shared 100% and 99.49% identity with the deduced protein sequence of the two potential candidate virulence genes, GE005140 and GE005139, in the Vp TPD plasmid. Thus, the Vp TPD_4-2-1 and Vp TPD_4-2-2 proteins were determined to be the putative key toxins of Vp TPD, and the genes of GE005140 (vhvp-1) and GE005139 (vhvp-2) in the 187,791 bp plasmid were identified as the putative virulence genes of Vp TPD. Vp TPD vhvp-1 genes were predicted to encode the four conserved protein domains including SpvA (GenBank: CL21676), neuraminidase (GenBank: pfam18413), TcA receptor binding (GenBank: CL139842.1), and TcA/TcB super family (GenBank: cl39627), and Vp TPD vhvp-2 genes were predicted to encode the three conserved domains including SpvB (GenBank: pfam03534), TcdB_toxin_midC (GenBank: pfam12255), and TcdB_toxin_midN superfamily (GenBank: cl13663).

The Spv protein has been identified as one of the most important virulence factors of Salmonella (20 22), and the SpvB protein was reported to act as an intracellular toxin that covalently modified monomeric actin, leading to loss of F-actin filaments and depolymerization of the cytoskeleton in Salmonella-infected human macrophages (23 25). The C-terminal domain of SpvB was reported to contain ADP-ribosyl transferase activity, which modifies G-actin monomers and prevents their polymerization into F-actin filaments (25, 26), and SpvB has been shown to increase cell damage mainly through its F-actin depolymerization-associated function and induction of apoptotic cell death (27-28, 29). The insecticidal toxin complex protein was composed of several subunits including TcA, TcB, TcC, and TcD; TcA facilitates receptor-toxin interaction and membrane permeation; TcB and TcC form a toxin-encapsulating cocoon (30 32). It has been reported that the TcdB toxin may act synergistically with another glycosylating toxin, TcdA. First, TcdA acts to disrupted epithelial integrity and then allows TcdB to enter and mediate toxic effects within the host (31, 33, 34). In addition, TcdB has been shown to disrupt epithelial integrity and cause tissue damage in human colon explants (35, 36). During infection, it is likely that TcdB first engages NECTIN3 and frizzled proteins to enter and intoxicate the colonic epithelium. Following epithelial damage or loss of tight junctions, the toxin could gain access to CSPG4 in the subepithelial myofibroblasts, causing further mucosal damage (37 39). A previous study on Vp TPD showed that necrosis and sloughing of the epithelial cells occurred in the hepatopancreatic tubules and midgut of naturally infected or immersion-challenged P. vannamei post-larval individuals (4). Correspondingly, the same histopathological changes, including necrosis and sloughing of the hepatopancreatic and enteric epithelial cells, also occurred in P. vannamei post-larvae from the live Vp TPD-challenged group and the >100 kDa proteins of Vp TPD-challenged group in the present study. That is, the above pathological changes in the TPD-affected shrimp individuals were consistent with the known pathological characteristics induced by the predicted novel virulence gene vhvp-2, encoding the domains of Spv plasmid toxin and Tc toxins. The epidemiological studies indicated that the vhvp-2 gene was only present in the diseased shrimps with typical TPD syndromes. Moreover, experiments of deletion and complement mutants of the vhvp-2 gene in Vp TPD further confirmed that the vhvp-2 gene plays a key role in the realization of Vp TPD virulence. Meanwhile, the results of the epidemiological investigation and challenge test indicated that the V. parahaemolyticus isolate carrying only the vhvp-1 gene and lacking vhvp-2 gene could not cause mortality of experimental P. vannamei post-larvae. All the abovementioned results indicated that vhvp-2 was the key virulence gene of Vp TPD in P. vannamei. The functional mechanism of the virulence factor VHVP-2 in causing the shedding of intestinal epithelial cells of Vp TPD-infected shrimp deserves further investigation.

Salmonella infection (salmonellosis) is a common bacterial disease that affects intestinal tract of animals and humans (40), and the most frequent infection route in humans is through consuming contaminated water or foods (41, 42). Recent reports have shown that farmed shrimps may serve as potential reservoirs and carriers of Salmonella bacteria and, therefore, pose a potential risk to public health (43 47). The present study showed that Vp TPD becomes lethally virulent to shrimp post-larvae because it acquired vhvp-2 gene encoding the domain of Salmonella virulence plasmid 28.1 kDa A protein and 65 kDa B protein (SpvB). Meanwhile, these results suggested that the shrimp infected by Vp TPD could pose potential risks to public health as well as the other farmed or wild animals via spreading the virulent vhvp-2 gene in the aquatic environment.

In summary, we preliminarily demonstrated that a novel virulence protein, VHVP-2, was the key toxin of Vp TPD, and it was encoded by vhvp-2 gene located on a 187,892-bp plasmid of the Vp TPD genome. This means that the opportunistic pathogen V. parahaemolyticus becomes lethally virulent to shrimp post-larvae by acquiring the virulence factor of VHVP-2. In addition, this study established a PCR detection method of Vp TPD for early warning of TPD. These results proved new insights into the pathogenic mechanism of Vp TPD and provided the first molecular detection method for Vp TPD. The present study would be helpful for further investigation of Vp TPD in terms of its diagnostic technique and pathogenic mechanism, as well as for the prevention and control of TPD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experiment shrimp

The specific pathogen-free P. vanmamei post-larvae (PL3, body length 4–6 mm) were collected from the Haixingnong Shrimp Breeding Northern Base of BLUMP Seed Industry Technology Co., Ltd in Weifang, Shandong Province. P. vanmamei post-larvae were acclimated to the laboratory conditions for 2 days in 10 L glass tanks with continuous aeration (at 24°C, salinity 26 ± 3 g/L), fed three times a day with pelleted commercial feed, and then used for the challenge test.

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

V. parahaemolyticus of Vp TPD (Vp-JS20200428004-2) was isolated from moribund P. vannamei suffering from translucent post-larvae disease and stored in 15% (vol/vol) glycerol tubes at −80°C in the authors’ laboratory (4). The strain was inoculated into tryptic soy broth tubes (Land Bridge Technology, Beijing, China), supplemented with 2% NaCl, and incubated for 12 h at 28°C, 200 rpm (shaking). E. coli strains were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and grown in Luria-Bertani broth medium at 37°C. Ampicillin, kanamycin, and chloramphenicol concentrations were supplemented at 100, 50, and 34 µg/mL, respectively. The bacterial strains in this study were listed in Table 1. The two Escherichia coli strains DH5α λpir and S17–1 λpir were provided by professor Qiyao Wang from East China University of Science and Technology.

TABLE 1.

The bacterial strains used in this study

Strains Temperature Source or reference
V. parahaemolyticus strains
Vp TPD (Vp-JS20200428004-2) 28°C Zou et al. (4)
 Δvhvp-2 28°C This study
 Δvhvp-2/pwtCas9-vhvp-2 28°C This study
 Δvhvp-2/pBT3-vhvp-2 28°C This study
Escherichia coli strains
 DH5α λpir 37°C Ma et al. (48)
 S17–1 λpir 37°C Ma et al. (48)

Inactivation of Vp TPD

Following the abovementioned steps, both of the lysate protein extracts by ultrasonic disruption of Vp TPD + U and the upper filtrate of lysate protein extract by ultrasonic disruption of Vp TPD + U (MW >100 kDa) were prepared. After being filtered through a 0.22 µm pore size syringe filter, the liquid of lysate protein extract by ultrasonic disruption of Vp TPD + U was treated by heating at 65°C for 45 min and designed as the group of Vp TPD + U and H. The upper filtrate portion of Vp TPD + U (>100 kDa) with the same heat treatment was used as the group of Vp TPD + U and H (>100 kDa). To determine the inactivation effect of different inactivation methods on Vp TPD, the viable bacteria in pure cultured Vp TPD (Vp TPD), the inactivated Vp TPD treated by ultrasonic disruption treatment (Vp TPD + U), and the inactivated Vp TPD treated by ultrasonic disruption and pasteurization (Vp TPD + U and H) were investigated by using plate-spreading technique.

Preparation of Vp TPD protein fragments with different molecular weights

The pure culture of Vp TPD was centrifuged at 6,000 rpm for 10 min, the pellet was washed twice with 1× PBS and then resuspended in 1× PBS. The concentration of Vp TPD was adjusted to 1.0 of OD600 (approximately equivalent to 109 CFU/mL) using a microplate reader, and the accurate concentration of Vp TPD was then confirmed by plate colony counting method. The Vp TPD preparation was used as live Vp TPD for experimental challenge with immersion method. To obtain different molecular weight proteins of Vp TPD, the Vp TPD suspension was disrupted using an ultrasonic homogenizer (Xinzhi, Ningbo, China), and the Vp TPD ultrasonic disruption liquid was then filtered through a 0.22-µm filter to eliminate residuals of Vp TPD. The filtrate was then transferred to an ultrafiltration tube with a cut-off molecular weight of 100 kDa and centrifuged at 5,000 × g for 20 min. After centrifugation, the liquid in the upper portion above the filter in the ultrafiltration tube was resuspended and washed, then pooled together as the larger bacterial proteins (Vp TPD + U, MW >100 kDa). The filtrated part of the liquid at the bottom of the ultrafiltration tube was transferred to a new ultrafiltration tube with a cut-off molecular weight of 50 kDa and centrifuged at 7,500 × g for 20 min. Similarly, the top portion of liquid was resuspended and collected as the group of Vp TPD + U (MW: 50–100 kDa). Following the same abovementioned protocols, the groups of Vp TPD + U (MW: 30–50 kDa), Vp TPD + U (MW:10–30 kDa), and Vp TPD + U (MW <10 kDa) were prepared by using proper size ultrafiltration tubes, respectively. The procedure and protocol for preparing the different molecular weight proteins of Vp TPD for experimental challenge are shown in Fig. 1a.

SDS-PAGE analysis of the lysate protein extract of ultrasonic disrupted Vp TPD

The lysate protein extracts Vp TPD were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis using the SurePAGE precast gel (GenScript, Nanjing, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Then the gel was visualized after being stained with Coomassie brilliant blue R-250.

Identification of virulence factor using mass spectrometer

To identify the suspected virulent factor(s) causing TPD, the target bands with a molecular weight greater than 100 kDa were excised from the gel using a sterile scalpel and then subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis of the protein, according to the previous methods (49 51). The digested samples were analyzed through mass spectrometer by using Easy-nLC 1200 (Thermo Scientific, P/N LC140) and Orbitrap Exploris 480 (Thermo Scientific, P/N BRE725533). Following extraction of the mass spectra data with Proteome Discover software, the database was searched using the Sequest search engine. The search parameters were as follows: the database was the Vibrio protein library; trypsin digestion, the maximum missed cut was 2; the mass error of the primary precursor ion was 10 ppm; the mass error of the secondary fragment ion was 0.02 Da; methionine (M) oxidation and asparagine (N) deamination were set as variable modifications as described in the previous research (52).

Genomic DNA preparation and whole-genome sequencing

To clarify the virulence genes encoding the unique virulence protein of Vp TPD, the complete genome sequencing and comparative genome analysis of Vp TPD and a non-virulent V. parahaemolyticus isolate (ATCC 33847, designed as Vp 1616) were carried out. The genomic DNAs of Vp TPD and Vp 1616 were extracted using TIANamp Bacteria DNA Kit (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd, Beijing, China) and sequenced using Biomarker Technologies Corporation (Beijing, China) Nanopore Sequencing Technology Platform. The genome sequences of Vp TPD (GenBank: SRR23329176) and Vp 1616 (GenBank: CP127846 and CP127847) have been deposited to NCBI.

Genome composition prediction, comments, and comparative genome analysis

Genome composition prediction was mainly divided into three sections including coding regions, non-coding RNA, and repetitive sequences. Repetitive sequences were predicted based on the principle of de novo sequencing using Tandem Repeats Finder (TRF) (53). Coding regions in the genome were identified using Glimmer (54), then related genes were predicted. All predicted genes were used as an input for NR, Swiss-Prot, GO, Cluster of Orthologous Groups (COG), EuKaryotic Orthologous Groups (KOG), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) databases (55, 56). The deduced proteins from the Vp TPD strain genome were aligned to that of the Vp 1616 strain genome using Blastp software (v2.5.0).

Plasmid construction, gene deletion, and complementation

The plasmid pDM4 was provided by professor Qiyao Wang from East China University of Science and Technology. The plasmids pBT3 and pwtCas9 were provided by professor Li Sun from Institute of Oceanology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The plasmids, as well as the primers used in detecing and gene deletion, were listed in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. The primers used for the complementation experiment are 5139-C-F (5'-AGAAAAGAATTCAAAAGATCTAAAGAGGAGAAAGGATCTATGCAAAATATAAATAATCTG-3') and 5139-C-R (5'-GCCTGGAGATCCTTACTCGAGTCATGCGGTATCGTTTTCATCTTCATTGA-3'), respectively. The primers used for the gene overexpression experiment are 5139-OE-F (5'-GGAGATATACATATGGATATCATGCAAAATATAAATAATCTGAAAC-3') and 5139-OE-R (5'-GTGGTGGTGCTCGAGGATATCTCATGCGGTATCGTTTTC-3'), respectively.

TABLE 2.

The plasmids used in this study

Plasmid Source or reference Antibiotic used in this study
pDM4 Ma et al. (48) 34 µg/mL chloramphenicol
pBT3 Zhang et al. (57) 100 µg/mL ampicillin
pwtCas9 Liu et al. (58) 100 µg/mL ampicillin
pDM4vhvp-2 This study 34 µg/mL chloramphenicol
pBT3vhvp-2 This study 100 µg/mL ampicillin
pwtCas9vhvp-2 This study 100 µg/mL ampicillin

TABLE 3.

The PCR primers based on the vhvp gene for detecting Vp TPD a

Targeted gene Name of primers Sequence of primers (5′−3′) Source
vhvp-1 Vp TPD-vhvp-1-F1 GAGGAGAGTGTTGACCGAAATC This study
Vp TPD-vhvp-1-R1 CTGCGCCAGTAGTAACGATAAG
vhvp-2 Vp TPD-vhvp-2-F1 GGAGTATTGGTGGGCTGAAA This study
Vp TPD-vhvp-2-R1 GGTAGGCATGGACCGTAAAG
vhvp-2 Vp TPD- vhvp-2-F2 CTAAGCCTTGGCTCCTGAAA This study
Vp TPD-vhvp-2-R2 CGGTCAGAATATCGGTATCGTAAA
vhvp-2 Δ5139upF
Δ5139upR
Δ5139doF
Δ5139doR
TTAGTCGACGGAGTATTGGTGGGCTGAAA (SalI)
TCCATACTCATGGTAGGCATGGACCGTAAAG
CCATGCCTACCATGAGTATGGACTGCCGTTAAG
GGAAGATCTGTCAGCAAAGTATCTCGGTAAGA (BglII)
This study
a

Underlined nucleotides are restriction sites of the enzymes indicated in the brackets at the ends.

For deletion of the virulence gene (vhvp) of Vp TPD, pDM4 was used for in-frame deletion as previously described (59). In brief, fragments upstream and downstream of the CDS of the vhvp-2 gene were amplified and overlapped by PCR and then inserted into pDM4 at the indicated endonuclease sites (Table 3). The deletion mutant, Δvhvp-2, was generated by two-step homologous recombination and verified by PCR and sequencing.

For the construction of the vhvp-2 gene complement strain, pBT3 was used as previously reported (60). Briefly, the vhvp-2 gene was cloned with primers 5139 C-F/5139 C-R and then inserted into pBT3 at the EcoRV site. The resulting plasmid pBT3-vhvp-2 was then electroporated into Δvhvp-2 to yield the complement strain Δvhvp-2/pBT3-vhvp-2. Positive colonies were selected based on the ampicillin resistance, PCR, and sequencing analyses.

For gene overexpression, the PCR product of vhvp-2 gene was inserted into pwtCas9 bacterial between the BglII and XhoI sites to allow inducible expression of the gene under a tetracycline promoter. The resulting plasmid was introduced into the indicated Δvhvp-2 strain by electroporation. Where appropriate, the expression was induced by the addition of 2 µL of anhydrotetracycline.

Experimental challenge by immersion

The healthy post-larvae of P. vannamei were randomly divided into seven groups (negative control, PBS), positive control (live Vp TPD), Vp TPD + U (>100 kDa), Vp TPD + U (50–100 kDa), Vp TPD + U (30–50 kDa), Vp TPD + U (10–30 kDa), Vp TPD + U (<10 kDa), 15 shrimp individuals per group with three replicates for each group. The average body length of the shrimp was 5.5 mm ± 0.2 mm (n = 10). The immersion challenge test was performed as previously described by Tran et al. (61) with minor modifications. To determine the pathogenicity of the virulent protein fractions of Vp TPD with different molecular weights to post-larvae of P. vannamei, mortalities were monitored every 8 h for 40 h. The moribund shrimps were also collected for histopathological analysis.

V. parahemolyticus Δvhvp-2 was cultured as above described and harvested at OD600 1.0. For Δvhvp-2 motility analysis, P. vannamei (P5-P7) were randomly divided into three groups (10 shrimps/group). Shrimps from group 1 (NC) were immersed in seawater. The shrimps in the groups 2 and 3 were similarly immersed with 900 µL of Vp TPD and Δvhvp-2, respectively, in 900 mL seawater, and the mortalities of shrimp were recorded for 32 h.

V. parahemolyticus Vp TPD, Δvhvp-2/pBT3-vhvp-2, and Δvhvp-2/pwtCas9-vhvp-2 were cultured as above described and collected at OD600 0.5. To examine the mortality-inducing capacity of the V. parahemolyticus strains, shrimps from four groups (10 shrimps/group) were immersed with Vp TPD, Δvhvp-2/pBT3-vhvp-2, and Δvhvp-2/pwtCas9-vhvp-2, and their mortalities were recorded as described above for 32 h.

Histopathology

The moribund post-larval shrimps were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA)–phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (PFA-PBS) fixative solution for 24 h and then dehydrated through a gradient of ethanol solutions (4). The treated shrimps were then immediately embedded in paraffin. Paraffin sections (3 µm) of each sample were prepared and stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H&E), according to the routine histological procedures described by Lightner (62). The histopathological changes of each sample were visualized and recorded using the Pannoramic MIDI section scanning system (3DHISTECH Ltd, Budapest, Hungary).

PCR detection of Vp TPD

Based on the sequences of Vp TPD, three pairs of PCR primers (Vp TPD -vhvp-1-F1/R1, Vp TPD-vhvp-2-F1/R1, and Vp TPD-vhvp-2-F2/R2, Table 3) were designed to detect the virulence gene of vhvp in the strain of Vp TPD. Total genomic DNA extracted from Vp TPD was used as a template for the PCR assay. The reaction mixture contained 1 µL genomic DNA, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 1.5 mM dNTP, 0.4 µM primers (Vp TPD -vhvp-1-F1/R1, Vp TPD-vhvp-2-F1/R1, or Vp TPD-vhvp-2-F2/R2), 2.5 U TaKaRa EX Taq DNA polymerase (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). The PCR was performed at 94°C for 4 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 58°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 40 s, ending with 72°C for 7 min. The PCR products were then analyzed in a 1.5% agarose gel containing GeneFinder (Bio-V, Xiamen, China). The expected PCR amplicons of the three sets of primers (Vp TPD -vhvp-1-F/R, Vp TPD-vhvp-2-F1/R1, and Vp TPD-vhvp-2-F2/R2) were 362 bp, 351 bp, and 303 bp in length, respectively.

Epidemiological analysis of Vp TPD

Shrimp samples were collected from the shrimp farms in Hebei, Shandong, Jiangsu, Hainan, Xinjiang, Hunan, Hubei, and Guangdong provinces of China from April 2020 to 2021. The samples collected from each pond were divided into three parts: the first part was preserved in 95% ethanol for nucleic acid preparation, the second part was used for histopathological assay, and the third part was used for bacterial isolation. The dominant bacterial strains were isolated from the samples, according to the method described previously (4). Shrimp samples were disinfected with 75% alcohol, washed three times with 1× PBS buffer (pH 7.2; Solarbio, Shanghai, China), and then homogenized in 1× PBS buffer. Bacteria in the homogenized liquid were inoculated onto Marine 2216 agar plates for further growth at 28°C. The dominant bacterial strains were further proliferated in Marine 2216 broth and then used for genomic DNA preparation. The PCR method was applied for diagnosis of the presence of Vp TPD in the DNA samples acquired directly from the shrimp tissues or from the bacterial cultures from the shrimp samples.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were performed in triplicate. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, USA). Data were analyzed using Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

Supplementary Material

Reviewer comments
reviewer-comments.pdf (695.3KB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank Professor Li Sun from Institute of Oceanology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences for her generous help in the experiment of complement mutant of VpTPD, thank Professor Qiyao Wang from East China University of Science and Technology for his generous help in the experiment of isogenic mutant of VpTPD, and thank Dr. Xiao Fan and Dr. Yongwei Yan for their generous help in the genomic sequence search and analysis.

This work was supported by the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund, CAFS (no. 2020TD39; 2021XT0602), earmarked fund for CARS-48, Project of Species Conservation from the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs-Marine fisheries resources collection and preservation, Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund, YSFRI, CAFS (no. 20603022021022 & 20603022023009), and Qingdao Postdoctoral Researcher Applied Research Project.

Q.Z. designed the study. S.L., W.W., T.-T.X., T.J., W.W., and C.W. executed the experiment. K.L. and J.K. supplied the SPF shrimp post-larvae. S.L. and L.X. screened the location of related genes in the genome. G.X. helps to isolate the original VpTPD strain. S.L. wrote the manuscript. Q.Z. and J.L. revised the manuscript. All authors interpreted the data, critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual contents, and approved the final version.

Contributor Information

Qingli Zhang, Email: zhangql@ysfri.ac.cn.

Philip N. Rather, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

DATA AVAILABILITY

All the high-throughput sequencing has been deposited in GenBank, and the accession numbers have been listed in the context of the paper. The genome sequences of VpTPD (GenBank: SRR23329176) and Vp1616 (GenBank: CP127846 and CP127847) obtained in the present study have been deposited at NCBI.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00492-23.

OPEN PEER REVIEW. reviewer-comments.pdf.

An accounting of the reviewer comments and feedback.

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00492-23.SuF1

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. L H . 2020. Shrimp hatcheries in China hit by ‘glass post-larvae’: under currentnews. Available from: https://www.undercurrentnews.com/2020/04/22/shrimp-hatcheries-in-china-hit-by-glass-post-larvae
  • 2. L H 2020. Chinese scientists confirm new virus causes shrimp ‘glass post-larvae’’. Available from: https://www.undercurrentnews.com/2020/05/08/Chinese-scientists-confirm-new-virus-causes-shrimp-glass-post-larvae
  • 3. Yang F, Xu LM, Huang WZ, Li F. 2022. Highly lethal Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains cause acute mortality in Penaeus vannamei post-larvae. Aquaculture 548:737605. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737605 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Zou Y, Xie G, Jia T, Xu T, Wang C, Wan X, Li Y, Luo K, Bian X, Wang X, Kong J, Zhang Q. 2020. Determination of the infectious agent of translucent post-larva disease (TPD) in Penaeus vannamei Pathogens 9:741. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9090741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Han JE, Tang KFJ, Tran LH, Lightner DV. 2015. Photorhabdus insect-related (Pir) toxin-like genes in a plasmid of Vibrio parahaemolyticus, the causative agent of acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease (AHPND) of shrimp. Dis Aquat Organ 113:33–40. doi: 10.3354/dao02830 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Rao PSS, Tan YP, Zheng J, Leung KY. 2006. Unraveling Edwardsiella tarda pathogenesis using the proteomics approach. Methods Biochem Anal 49:237–244. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Pang H, Li W, Zhang W, Zhou S, Hoare R, Monaghan SJ, Jian J, Lin X. 2020. Acetylome profiling of Vibrio alginolyticus reveals its role in bacterial virulence. J Proteomics 211:103543. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2019.103543 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lee C-T, Chen I-T, Yang Y-T, Ko T-P, Huang Y-T, Huang J-Y, Huang M-F, Lin S-J, Chen C-Y, Lin S-S, Lightner DV, Wang H-C, Wang AH-J, Wang H-C, Hor L-I, Lo C-F. 2015. The opportunistic marine pathogen Vibrio parahaemolyticus becomes virulent by acquiring a plasmid that expresses a deadly toxin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:10798–10803. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1503129112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Zhang X, Sun J, Chen F, Qi H, Chen L, Sung YY, Huang Y, Lv A, Hu X. 2021. Phenotypic and genomic characterization of a Vibrio parahaemolyticus strain causing disease in Penaeus vannamei provides insights into its niche adaptation and pathogenic mechanism. Microb Genom 7:000549. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000549 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Prithvisagar KS, Krishna Kumar B, Kodama T, Rai P, Iida T, Karunasagar I, Karunasagar I. 2021. Whole genome analysis unveils genetic diversity and potential virulence determinants in Vibrio parahaemolyticus associated with disease outbreak among cultured Litopenaeus vannamei (Pacific white shrimp) in India. Virulence 12:1936–1949. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2021.1947448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Luangtrakul W, Boonchuen P, Jaree P, Kumar R, Wang H-C, Somboonwiwat K. 2021. Cytotoxicity of Vibrio parahaemolyticus AHPND toxin on shrimp hemocytes, a newly identified target tissue, involves binding of toxin to aminopeptidase N1 receptor. PLoS Pathog 17:e1009463. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Dong X, Wang H, Zou P, Chen J, Liu Z, Wang X, Huang J. 2017. Complete genome sequence of Vibrio campbellii strain 20130629003S01 isolated from shrimp with acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease. Gut Pathog 9:31. doi: 10.1186/s13099-017-0180-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Wang H-C, Lin S-J, Mohapatra A, Kumar R, Wang H-C. 2020. A review of the functional annotations of important genes in the AHPND-causing pVA1 plasmid. Microorganisms 8:996. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8070996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Dong X, Song J, Chen J, Bi D, Wang W, Ren Y, Wang H, Wang G, Tang KFJ, Wang X, Huang J. 2019. Conjugative transfer of the pVA1-Type plasmid carrying the pirAB (vp) genes results in the formation of new AHPND-causing Vibrio. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 9:195. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Dong X, Bi D, Wang H, Zou P, Xie G, Wan X, Yang Q, Zhu Y, Chen M, Guo C, Liu Z, Wang W, Huang J. 2017. pirABvp-Bearing Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio campbellii pathogens isolated from the same AHPND-affected pond possess highly similar pathogenic plasmids. Front Microbiol 8:1859. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kondo H, Van PT, Dang LT, Hirono I. 2015. Draft genome sequence of non-Vibrio parahaemolyticus acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease strain KC13.17.5, isolated from diseased shrimp in Vietnam. Genome Announc 3:e00978-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00978-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kumar V, Roy S, Behera BK, Bossier P, Das BK. 2021. Acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease (AHPND): virulence, pathogenesis and mitigation strategies in shrimp aquaculture. Toxins (Basel) 13:524. doi: 10.3390/toxins13080524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Dong X, Chen J, Song J, Wang H, Wang W, Ren Y, Guo C, Wang X, Tang KFJ, Huang J. 2019. Evidence of the horizontal transfer of pVA1-type plasmid from AHPND-causing V. campbellii to non-AHPND V. owensii. Aquaculture 503:396–402. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.01.016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Wang D, Wang L, Bi D, Song J, Wang G, Gao Y, Tang KFJ, Meng F, Xie J, Zhang F, Huang J, Li J, Dong X. 2022. Conjugative transfer of acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease-causing pVA1-Type plasmid is mediated by a novel self-encoded Type IV secretion system. Microbiol Spectr 10:e0170222. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01702-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Guiney DG, Fierer J. 2011. The role of the spv genes in salmonella pathogenesis. Front Microbiol 2:129. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Buckner MMC, Croxen MA, Arena ET, Finlay BB. 2011. A comprehensive study of the contribution of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium SPI2 effectors to bacterial colonization, survival and replication in typhoid fever, macrophage and epithelial cell infection models. Virulence 2:208–216. doi: 10.4161/viru.2.3.15894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Chu Y, Gao S, Wang T, Yan J, Xu G, Li Y, Niu H, Huang R, Wu S. 2016. A novel contribution of SpvB to pathogenesis of Salmonella Typhimurium by inhibiting autophagy in host cells. Oncotarget 7:8295–8309. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Sun L, Yang S, Deng Q, Dong K, Li Y, Wu S, Huang R. 2020. Salmonella effector SpvB disrupts intestinal epithelial barrier integrity for bacterial translocation. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 10:606541. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.606541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Hochmann H, Pust S, von Figura G, Aktories K, Barth H. 2006. Salmonella enterica SpvB ADP-ribosylates actin at position arginine-177-characterization of the catalytic domain within the SpvB protein and a comparison to binary clostridial actin-ADP-ribosylating toxins. Biochemistry 45:1271–1277. doi: 10.1021/bi051810w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Lesnick ML, Reiner NE, Fierer J, Guiney DG. 2001. The Salmonella SpvB virulence gene encodes an enzyme that ADP‐ribosylates actin and destabilizes the cytoskeleton of eukaryotic cells. Mol Microbiol 39:1464–1470. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02360.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Lesnick ML, Guiney DG. 2001. The best defense is a good offense--salmonella deploys an ADP-ribosylating toxin. Trends Microbiol 9:2–4. doi: 10.1016/s0966-842x(00)01902-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Harterink M, da Silva ME, Will L, Turan J, Ibrahim A, Lang AE, van Battum EY, Pasterkamp RJ, Kapitein LC, Kudryashov D, Barres BA, Hoogenraad CC, Zuchero JB. 2017. DeActs: genetically encoded tools for perturbing the actin cytoskeleton in single cells. Nat Methods 14:479–482. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Yang S, Deng Q, Sun L, Dong K, Li Y, Wu S, Huang R. 2019. Salmonella effector SpvB interferes with intracellular iron homeostasis via regulation of transcription factor NRF2. FASEB J 33:13450–13464. doi: 10.1096/fj.201900883RR [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Ai K, Gotoh H, Eguchi M, Okada N, Matsuura S, Matsui H, Danbara H, Kikuchi Y. 2003. Intracellular expression of the Salmonella plasmid virulence protein, SpvB, causes apoptotic cell death in eukaryotic cells. Microb Pathog 35:43–48. doi: 10.1016/s0882-4010(03)00066-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Chandrasekaran R, Lacy DB. 2017. The role of toxins in Clostridium difficile infection. FEMS Microbiol Rev 41:723–750. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fux048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Lyerly DM, Lockwood DE, Richardson SH, Wilkins TD. 1982. Biological activities of toxins A and B of Clostridium difficile. Infect Immun 35:1147–1150. doi: 10.1128/iai.35.3.1147-1150.1982 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Steinemann M, Schlosser A, Jank T, Aktories K. 2018. The chaperonin TRiC/CCT is essential for the action of bacterial glycosylating protein toxins like Clostridium difficile toxins A and B. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:9580–9585. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1807658115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Mitchell TJ, Ketley JM, Haslam SC, Stephen J, Burdon DW, Candy DC, Daniel R. 1986. Effect of toxin A and B of Clostridium difficile on rabbit ileum and colon. Gut 27:78–85. doi: 10.1136/gut.27.1.78 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Lyerly DM, Saum KE, MacDonald DK, Wilkins TD. 1985. Effects of Clostridium difficile toxins given intragastrically to animals. Infect Immun 47:349–352. doi: 10.1128/iai.47.2.349-352.1985 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Riegler M, Sedivy R, Pothoulakis C, Hamilton G, Zacherl J, Bischof G, Cosentini E, Feil W, Schiessel R, LaMont JT. 1995. Clostridium difficile toxin B is more potent than toxin A in damaging human colonic epithelium in vitro. J Clin Invest 95:2004–2011. doi: 10.1172/JCI117885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Savidge TC, Pan W-H, Newman P, O’brien M, Anton PM, Pothoulakis C. 2003. Clostridium difficile toxin B is an inflammatory enterotoxin in human intestine. Gastroenterology 125:413–420. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(03)00902-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. LaFrance ME, Farrow MA, Chandrasekaran R, Sheng J, Rubin DH, Lacy DB. 2015. Identification of an epithelial cell receptor responsible for Clostridium difficile TcdB-induced cytotoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:7073–7078. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1500791112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Tao L, Zhang J, Meraner P, Tovaglieri A, Wu X, Gerhard R, Zhang X, Stallcup WB, Miao J, He X, Hurdle JG, Breault DT, Brass AL, Dong M. 2016. Frizzled proteins are colonic epithelial receptors for C. difficile toxin B. Nature 538:350–355. doi: 10.1038/nature19799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Gupta P, Zhang Z, Sugiman-Marangos SN, Tam J, Raman S, Julien JP, Kroh HK, Lacy DB, Murgolo N, Bekkari K, Therien AG, Hernandez LD, Melnyk R 2. 2017. Functional defects in Clostridium difficile TcdB toxin uptake identify CSPG4 receptor-binding determinants. J Biol Chem 292:17290–17301. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.806687 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Giannella, R.A. 1996. Chapter 21 Salmonella . In Baron, S. , Ed., Medical Microbiology, 4th Edition, University of Texas Medical Branch at; Galveston, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Vågene ÅJ, Herbig A, Campana MG, Robles García NM, Warinner C, Sabin S, Spyrou MA, Andrades Valtueña A, Huson D, Tuross N, Bos KI, Krause J. 2018. Salmonella enterica genomes from victims of a major sixteenth-century epidemic in Mexico. Nat Ecol Evol 2:520–528. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0446-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Galán JE. 2021. Salmonella Typhimurium and inflammation: a pathogen-centric affair. Nat Rev Microbiol 19:716–725. doi: 10.1038/s41579-021-00561-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Hamilton KA, Chen A, de-Graft Johnson E, Gitter A, Kozak S, Niquice C, Zimmer-Faust AG, Weir MH, Mitchell J, Gurian P. 2018. Salmonella risks due to consumption of aquaculture-produced shrimp. Microb Risk Anal 9:22–32. doi: 10.1016/j.mran.2018.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Beshiru A, Igbinosa IH, Igbinosa EO. 2019. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance and virulence gene elements of Salmonella serovars from ready-to-eat (RTE) shrimps. Front Microbiol 10:1613. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01613 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Akiyama T, Khan AA, Cheng CM, Stefanova R. 2011. Molecular characterization of Salmonella enterica serovar Saintpaul isolated from imported seafood, pepper, environmental and clinical samples. Food Microbiol 28:1124–1128. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2011.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Beshiru A, Okareh OT, Okoh AI, Igbinosa EO. 2020. Detection of antibiotic resistance and virulence genes of Vibrio strains isolated from ready-to-eat shrimps in Delta and Edo States, Nigeria. J Appl Microbiol 129:17–36. doi: 10.1111/jam.14590 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Hounmanou YMG, Dalsgaard A, Sopacua TF, Uddin GMN, Leekitcharoenphon P, Hendriksen RS, Olsen JE, Larsen MH. 2020. Molecular characteristics and zoonotic potential of Salmonella Weltevreden from cultured shrimp and tilapia in Vietnam and China. Front Microbiol 11:1985. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01985 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Ma R, Liu Y, Gan J, Qiao H, Ma J, Zhang Y, Bu Y, Shao S, Zhang Y, Wang Q. 2022. Xenogeneic nucleoid-associated EnrR thwarts H-NS silencing of bacterial virulence with unique DNA binding. Nucleic Acids Res 50:3777–3798. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Shevchenko A, Jensen ON, Podtelejnikov AV, Sagliocco F, Wilm M, Vorm O, Mortensen P, Shevchenko A, Boucherie H, Mann M. 1996. Linking genome and proteome by mass spectrometry: large-scale identification of yeast proteins from two dimensional gels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:14440–14445. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Calderaro A, Arcangeletti M-C, Rodighiero I, Buttrini M, Gorrini C, Motta F, Germini D, Medici M-C, Chezzi C, De Conto F. 2014. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry applied to virus identification. Sci Rep 4:6803. doi: 10.1038/srep06803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Xiu L, Zhang C, Wu Z, Peng J. 2017. Establishment and application of a universal coronavirus screening method using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Front Microbiol 8:1510. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Zhao L, Zhang Z, Wang M, Sun J, Li H, Malakar PK, Liu H, Pan Y, Zhao Y. 2018. New insights into the changes of proteome and microbiome of shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) stored in acidic electrolyzed water ice. J Agric Food Chem 66:4966–4976. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b00498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC, Salzberg SL. 2007. Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics 23:673–679. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Li R, Li Y, Zheng H, Luo R, Zhu H, Li Q, Qian W, Ren Y, Tian G, Li J, Zhou G, Zhu X, Wu H, Qin J, Jin X, Li D, Cao H, Hu X, Blanche H, Cann H, Zhang X, Li S, Bolund L, Kristiansen K, Yang H, Wang J, Wang J. 2010. Building the sequence map of the human pan-genome. Nat Biotechnol 28:57–63. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1596 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Blin K, Shaw S, Steinke K, Villebro R, Ziemert N, Lee SY, Medema MH, Weber T. 2019. antiSMASH 5.0: updates to the secondary metabolite genome mining pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 47:W81–W87. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz310 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Zhang W, Sun K, Cheng S, Sun L. 2008. Characterization of DegQVh, a serine protease and a protective immunogen from a pathogenic Vibrio harveyi strain. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:6254–6262. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00109-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Liu X, Wang X, Sun B, Sun L. 2022. The involvement of thiamine uptake in the virulence of Edwardsiella piscicida. Pathogens 11:464. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11040464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Milton DL, O’Toole R, Horstedt P, Wolf-Watz H. 1996. Flagellin A is essential for the virulence of Vibrio anguillarum. J Bacteriol 178:1310–1319. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.5.1310-1319.1996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Li MF, Du YT, Jin CD, Li XP, Sun YY. 2012. Edwardsiella piscicida Ail1: an outer membrane protein required for host infection. Fish Shellfish Immunol 32:586–592. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2012.01.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Tran L, Nunan L, Redman RM, Mohney LL, Pantoja CR, Fitzsimmons K, Lightner DV. 2013. Determination of the infectious nature of the agent of acute hepatopancreatic necrosis syndrome affecting penaeid shrimp. Dis Aquat Organ 105:45–55. doi: 10.3354/dao02621 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Lighter DV. 1996. A handbook of shrimp pathology and diagnostic procedures for diseases of cultured penaeid shrimp. World Aquaculture Society. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Reviewer comments
reviewer-comments.pdf (695.3KB, pdf)
OPEN PEER REVIEW. reviewer-comments.pdf.

An accounting of the reviewer comments and feedback.

DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00492-23.SuF1

Data Availability Statement

All the high-throughput sequencing has been deposited in GenBank, and the accession numbers have been listed in the context of the paper. The genome sequences of VpTPD (GenBank: SRR23329176) and Vp1616 (GenBank: CP127846 and CP127847) obtained in the present study have been deposited at NCBI.


Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES