Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol. 2023 Nov 15;211(10):1450–1458. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2200682

T Cell Receptor Pathway Mutations in Mature T Cell Lymphomas

Yue Zhang 1,2,*, Kathleen Cheng 1,2,*, Jaehyuk Choi 1,2
PMCID: PMC10715708  NIHMSID: NIHMS1908071  PMID: 37931208

Abstract

Mature T cell lymphomas are heterogenous neoplasms that are aggressive and resistant to treatment. Many of these cancers retain immunological properties of their cell-of-origin. They express cytokines, cytotoxic enzymes, and cell surface ligands normally induced by T cell receptor (TCR) signaling in untransformed T cells. Until recently, their molecular mechanisms were unclear. Recently, high-dimensional studies have transformed our understanding of their cellular and genetic characteristics. Somatic mutations in the TCR signaling pathway drive lymphomagenesis by disrupting auto-inhibitory domains, increasing affinity to ligands, and/or inducing TCR-independent signaling. Collectively, most of these mutations augment signaling pathways downstream of the TCR. Emerging data suggest these mutations not only drive proliferation but also determine lymphoma immunophenotypes. For example, RHOA mutations are sufficient to induce disease relevant CD4+ T follicular helper cell phenotypes. Herein, we describe how mutations in the TCR signaling pathway elucidate lymphoma pathophysiology but also provide insights into broader T cell biology.

Introduction

Mature T cell lymphomas (TCLs) are a heterogeneous group of aggressive and poorly understood neoplasms(1). Broadly, there are >30 types distinguished by cell of origin, clinical presentation, and molecular markers. TCLs can originate from lymph nodes or from extranodal tissue, such as the skin or the gastrointestinal tract(2). The majority originate from memory CD4+ T cells and have features of CD4+ T cell effector states(3, 4). For example, angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphomas (AITLs) have features of T follicular helper cells (Tfh)(5); anaplastic large cell lymphomas (ALCL) may have features of T helper 17 (TH17) cells(6); adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL), regulatory T cells (Treg)(7); and peripheral T cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), TH1 or TH2 cells(8). Extranodal TCLs, such as cutaneous T cell lymphomas, are thought to arise from tissue resident memory cells(9). Less commonly, lymphomas are derived from cytotoxic T cells, such as γ T cells and CD8+ T cells(10). For the sake of brevity, we will not review the clinical aspects required to diagnose and/or treat these entities in full detail. For more information, please see the review by Cortes and Palomero(11).

Poor survival outcomes in T cell lymphomas are partly linked to an incomplete understanding of their disease biology. Recently, high-dimensional -omics have provided foundational insights into their pathophysiology. While our understanding of the circuitry remains incomplete, most TCLs harbor recurrent mutations in the TCR signaling pathway. These likely contribute to disease pathophysiology by promoting proliferation and by altering the effector molecules expressed by the malignant T cell. These immunologically active molecules are clinically relevant as they contribute to disease phenotypes. For instance, cytotoxic T cell lymphomas produce cytotoxic enzymes which lead to ulcerated tumors(12). Herein we will describe the recurrent mutations in the T cell receptor signaling pathway and their effects on protein structure, signaling, and immunophenotypes.

Proximal TCR Signaling

The TCR complex contains two TCR chains, six cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3) chains, and either a CD4 or CD8 co-receptor. There are four TCR genes in humans (α, β, γ, and δ) that form heterodimers. The CD3 complex is composed of γ, δ, ε, and ζ subunits containing cytosolic immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs (ITAMs) that mediate intracellular signals. Non-covalent hydrophobic interactions associate the TCR heterodimer with the CD3 complex(13).

Antigens are presented by nucleated or antigen-presenting cells on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I or class II, respectively. TCR ligands are MHC molecules containing a peptide in the binding groove(14). Engagement of the TCR-MHC complex with sufficient affinity activates a series of protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs). LCK and FYN are Src-family PTKs that contain an Src homology 4 (SH4) lipid attachment domain, SH3, SH2, and tyrosine kinase (TK) domain(1517). Upon TCR engagement, LCK is recruited to the immune synapse and subsequently phosphorylates the TCR CD3-associated ITAMs to recruit another PTK, ZAP-70, and to initiate signal transduction(16). FYN and ITK are subject to gain-of-function point mutations and translocations in TCLs. These proximal PTKs activate scaffolding proteins (e.g., LAT, GADS, and SLP-76) that recruit and activate downstream enzymes such as PLCγ1, VAV1, and RHOA. Signals converge at hubs such as the CARD11/BCL10/MALT1 (CBM) complex and activate downstream nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFAT), activator protein-1 (AP-1), nuclear factor kappa-light-chain enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathways(1820). These pathways mediate multiple aspects of TCR-dependent biology, including both T cell proliferation and production of pro-proliferative cytokines such as interleukin-2 (IL-2)(21). Broadly, most TCR mutations in lymphomas activate one or more of the signaling pathways downstream of the TCR, e.g., the NFAT, AP-1, and NF-κB pathways (Figure 1).

Figure 1. T cell receptor signaling pathway members and frequency of SNVs and CNVs in AITL, ATL, CTCL, and PTCL-NOS.

Figure 1.

T cell signaling pathway members discussed previously are shown. Proximal PTKs activate scaffolding proteins (e.g., LAT, GADS, and SLP-76) that recruit and activate downstream enzymes such as PLCγ1, VAV1, and RHOA. Signals converge at hubs such as the CARD11/BCL10/MALT1 (CBM) complex and activate downstream nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFAT), activator protein-1 (AP-1), nuclear factor kappa-light-chain enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathways. A red border signifies genes with oncogenic mutations described above. A blue border denotes a tumor suppressor role in TCLs. The SNV and CNV frequencies in a cohort of AITL, ATL, CTCL, and PTCL-NOS (including Tfh-PTCL) samples as previously described are shown(28, 29, 40, 60, 62, 63, 95, 129). Red: AITL; Yellow: ATL; Blue: CTCL; Purple: PTCL-NOS. The SNV frequency is displayed for AITL, ATL, CTCL, and PTCL-NOS in the first row in darker color. The CNV frequency is displayed for ATL, CTCL, and PTCL-NOS in the second row in lighter color.

FYN contributes to proximal TCR signaling by phosphorylating ZAP70 and other substrates(22, 23). It is kept in an inactive basal state by C-terminal Src kinase (CSK), which phosphorylates FYN at the C-terminus p.Y531, providing a phosphotyrosine to bind to the FYN SH2 domain. The SH3 domain binds the linker between the SH2 and kinase domain; altogether, these interactions restrict the movement of the kinase domain, inhibiting catalytic activity(2426). Sequential biochemical interactions disentangle the inhibitory domains from the kinase domain during TCR signaling(27). For example, a conserved tryptophan between the linker and kinase domain interacts with a hydrophobic region in the αC helix and the residue rotates out of the helix during activation(27). FYN is mutated in 3–4% of AITL, ATL, and PTCL-NOS (Figure 1)(24, 28, 29). Mutations cluster in the SH3, SH2, and the C-terminus domains are predicted to prevent the inhibitory intramolecular interactions between 1) the C-terminus and the SH2 domain or 2) between the SH3 domain and linker region(Figure 2A)(24, 28). For example, SH2 domain mutations (p.L174R, p.R176C) prevent its binding to the phosphorylated p.Y531, while the C-terminal truncations or mutations (p.Y531H) eliminate the phosphorylation site critical for the autoinhibitory SH2-C-terminus interaction (Figure 2B)(24).

Figure 2. SNVs in TCR signaling pathway members disrupt key regulatory domains.

Figure 2.

The mutation locations within protein domains are shown in the lollipop diagrams (created with trackViewer(130)). The pie graph above a mutation position contains the percentage of the mutations within a gene that lie at the location for each TCL(26, 47, 69, 75, 131). They are ordered, from bottom to top, as AITL (red), ATL (yellow), CTCL (blue), and PTCL-NOS (purple). The autoinhibition mechanisms of TCR pathway members are shown in the structural diagrams. Point mutations affecting key domains are marked with a lightning bolt. Truncating mutations are marked with a stop figure. The left figures labeled “inhibited” show the interactions at basal state. The right figure labeled “activated” show the active conformation and the effects of mutations. A. Point mutations of FYN frequently occur in the SH3, SH2, and kinase domains. The most commonly mutated sites are p.R96 and p.R176. B. FYN is autoinhibited by the SH2 domain interacting with the C-terminus Y527 and SH3 domain interacting with the SH2-kinase linker domain. The Trp264 residue interacts with the αC helix of the kinase domain. During activation, the kinase domain is free to bind substrate. C-terminus mutations/truncations or mutations in the SH2 or SH3 domains disrupt the inhibitory interaction. C. Point mutations in PLCG1 frequently occur in the PH, catalytic, and C2 domains. The most commonly mutated sites are p.R48, p.S345, p.E1163, and p.D1165. D. The PLCG1 p.Y783 site is phosphorylated during activation and frees the catalytic core by binding to the C-SH2 domain. Mutations in the catalytic core or in the PH domain disrupt the autoinhibitory interface, allowing the catalytic core to access substrate. E. Point mutations in VAV1 frequently occur in the acidic linker region, PH, ZF, and C-SH3 domains. The most commonly mutated site is p.E556. F. VAV1 autoinhibition is mediated by Ac, PH, and CH domains that block the DH domain active site. Mutations in the Ac or DH domain disrupt the autoinhibition. Truncating or point mutations in the C-terminal SH3 domain are also frequently seen in TCLs. G. Point mutations in RHOA frequently occur in the GTP binding domains. The most commonly mutated site is p.G17. H. Point mutations in PRKCB frequently occur in the protein kinase domains. The most commonly mutated site is p.D427. I. PRKCB features a C1b domain that sequesters the essential p.F629 residue from the active site during autoinhibition. Mutations in the protein kinase N-lobe allow activation independent of upstream kinases. J. Point mutations in CARD11 frequently occur in the coiled coil and inhibitory domains. The most commonly mutated sites are p.D401 and p.E626. K. CARD11 forms an autoinhibited structure featuring multiple interactions with the inhibitory domain (ID). Phosphorylation of the domain activates CARD11. Mutations affecting the ID domain or linker region enables autonomous activation of CARD11.

Interleukin-2 tyrosine kinase (ITK) belongs to the Tec family of protein kinases. It is activated and recruited to the membrane by two mechanisms(30, 31). ZAP70 phosphorylates the adaptors LAT and SLP-76, which contain binding sites for the SH2 and SH3 domains of ITK(32). Simultaneously, co-stimulation through CD28 activates PI3K and produces PIP3, the attachment site of the ITK plekstrin homology (PH) domain. Activated ITK subsequently phosphorylates phospholipase C gamma (PLCγ1)(33, 34). In PTCL-NOS, there are recurrent ITK-SYK fusions linking the PH and TH domains of ITK with the kinase domain of the spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK)(35). The PH domain of ITK enables the fusion transcript to constitutively localize to lipid rafts near the sites of TCR signaling. This appears to be sufficient to enable phosphorylation of proximal signaling proteins in a TCR independent manner (36).

PLCG1

Following activation by proximal PTKs, PLCγ1 catalyzes the conversion of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) to inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG). PLCγ1 consists of an N-terminal PH region, an EF region, a catalytic X-Y domain with a γ1-specific array of SH2 and SH3 modules, and a C2 domain(37). Point mutations in PLCG1 are frequent in T cell neoplasms: 11% of AITL, 36% of ATL, 10% of CTCL, and 9% of PTCL-NOS (Figure 1)(28, 29, 38). They occur in the loop regions of the TIM-barrel surfaces that form the active site opening and in the C2, cSH2, and PH domains (Figure 2C)(39). These mutations increase production of IP3 and uniformly activate NFAT and AP-1, but variably activate NF-κB(38, 40, 41).

Normally, PLCγ1 is maintained in an inactive state by auto-inhibitory interactions between the catalytic X-Y domain and inhibitory C2, PH, and two SH2 domains, preventing the DH domain from binding lipid substrates (Figure 2D)(39, 42). Phosphorylation of p.Y783 disrupts the autoinhibitory interface and enables hydrolysis at the active site. p.S345F in the TIM barrel and p.S520F in the PH domain disrupt the autoinhibitory domain interactions and thus no longer require phosphorylation of p.Y783 for PLCγ1 kinase activity(43).

PLCG1 mutations have also been proposed to increase phosphodiesterase activity by increasing plasma membrane affinity and interaction with the PIP2(41). p.R48W, p.S345F, p.E1163K, p.D1165H, and p.VYEEDM1161V act through this mechanism(38, 44). Furthermore, the PLCG1 indel, p.VYEEDM1161V, reported in SS(45), occurs in the hotspot C2 domain of PLCG1, a calcium-dependent, membrane targeting module. p.VYEEDM1161V resulted in decreased expression of PLCγ1, suggesting that the indel affects protein stability and may lead to faster degradation of PLCγ1. Nevertheless, it increased phosphorylation of Y783 and is one of the most potent activators of NFAT compared to other PLCG1 mutations(38).

VAV1

VAV1, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF), activates Rho family GTPases RAC1, RHOA, and CDC42(46). It also has catalysis-independent mechanisms as an adaptor protein to activate the PLCγ1-dependent pathway, stimulating NFAT. VAV1 contains eight domains: N-terminal calponin homology (CH) and acidic (Ac) domains, Dbl homology (DH) and pleckstrin homology (PH) domains that make up a catalytic core, zinc finger (ZF), and C-terminal SH2 and SH3 domains. The active site (DH) is inhibited through multiple interactions with the Ac, PH, and CH domains that block access to substrate and inhibit GEF activity (Figure 2E)(47). The SH3 domain interacts with the PH and catalytic domains to stabilize these interactions and occlude the catalytic domain from substrates(48). The highly conserved p.Y174 position in the Ac region acts as a molecular lock by facilitating the binding of the inhibitory helix to the DH active site(47). Phosphorylation of p.Y174 by LCK and ZAP70 displaces the inhibitory helix from the DH domain and frees the active site to bind substrate (Figure 2F)(47).

VAV1 alterations in TCLs encompass point mutations, focal intragenic deletions that affect splicing, and gene fusions that delete the autoinhibitory C-terminal SH3 domain. Point mutations in VAV1 are frequently found in 5% of AITL, 18% of ATL, 1% of CTCL, and 6% of PTCL-NOS (Figure 1)(28, 29). Hotspots occur in the acidic, PH, zinc finger, and C-terminal SH3 domains that regulate VAV1. These mutations, such as p.Y174C in ATL, abolish the autoinhibitory interactions between the DH and Ac domains; the mechanism of the zinc finger domain mutations is uncertain(28). VAV1 mutations activate PLCγ1 and subsequently NFAT. It can also activate RAC1, with downstream effects on cytoskeleton remodeling and increased cJun N-terminal kinase (JNK) activity, which in turn activates the AP-1 signaling pathway(49).

Structural variants of VAV1 occur in PTCL-NOS, AITL and ALCL. The 778–786 deletion in PTCL is caused by a splice site mutation within the linker region between the SH2 and C-terminal SH3 domains(50). VAV1 rearrangements, such as VAV1-MYOF1 and others, eliminate the C-terminal SH3 domain of VAV1 and enable it to energetically favor the open, disinhibited configuration(5052).

Analogous to the SH3 domain point mutations, the VAV1-MYO1F fusion increases basal activation of VAV1-dependent signaling cascades, including MAPK (ERK1/2), JNK, and NFAT, which are further augmented by TCR stimulation. These cells have increased expression of MAF following CD3 and CD28 stimulation, preferential IL-4 secretion with stimulation by PMA/ionomycin, and enrichment of TH2 transcription signatures(53). These data suggest that a modification of TCR-associated signaling enzymes is sufficient to induce TH2 differentiation. Mechanistically, this may promote lymphomagenesis in part by creating a pro-tumor TH2 microenvironment and polarizing M2 tissue-resident macrophages(53). Notably, GATA3+ PTCL-NOS are the most aggressive of PTCL subtypes, suggesting the clinical importance of these genotype-phenotype interactions.

Structural rearrangements in VAV1-associated enzymes are common in ALCLs. The nucleophosmin (NPM)-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion combines the oligomerization domain of NPM with the C-terminal TK of ALK. It generates a constitutively active tyrosine kinase that defines a subset of ALK+ ALCLs. The fusion protein is essential for ALCL growth and survival by activating the STAT3, MEK/ERK, and PI3K/AKT pathways(5458). The fusion complexes with and phosphorylates VAV1, leading to upregulation of downstream small G-proteins such as CDC42 and RAC1(59). RAC1 and CDC42 regulate actin polymerization with ARP2/3, contributing to the shape and migration phenotype in ALCL similar to that of activated T cells(54).

RHOA

RHOA is a small GTPase activated upon TCR stimulation by specific GEFs, and it regulates the actin cytoskeleton, cell development, and proliferation. AITL (68%), ATL (8%), CTCL (5%), and PTCL-NOS (22%) have hotspot RHOA mutations (Figure 1). Notably, their oncogenic role varies depending on the cell of origin(60, 61).

The GTP binding domains of RHOA are recurrently mutated in TCL (Figure 2G). The p.G17V and p.A161D in AITL and p.N117I/K in CTCL have a dominant negative effect by sequestering upstream RhoGEFs and decreasing levels of RHO-GTP. In contrast, the p.C16R and p.A161P in ATL are gain-of-function and have increased GDP/GTP cycling rate and increased transcriptional activation(24, 6062). How RHOA mutations with distinct biochemical effects all support traditional cancer phenotypes, such as cell proliferation, during lymphomagenesis remains unclear.

Nonetheless, specific RHOA mutations have an impact on cell phenotypes. ATL cells carrying a WT or activating RHOA mutation (p.C16R/G, or p.A161P) have a Treg or effector T cell phenotype, while those carrying an inactivating RHOA mutation (p.G17V) have a memory T cell phenotype(60). RHOA p.G17V alteration accounts for 95% of RHOA mutations in AITL and 88% of RHOA mutations in PTCL-NOS (including Tfh-PTCL)(24, 29, 63, 64). Expression of the mutant RHOA isoform in premalignant cells is sufficient to induce expression of canonical Tfh markers PD-1, ICOS, CXCL13, BCL6, and CD10(65). The Tfh transcription factor BCL-6 and T-B interaction through SAP are required for AITL proliferation and lymphomagenesis(66). A mouse model of AITL generated with a p.G17V mutation led to proliferation of Tfh-like cells in lymph nodes with increased germinal center activity and plasma cell infiltration(61, 67).

Distal TCR Signaling

Protein Kinase C

Protein kinase C theta (PKC-θ, PRKCQ) and protein kinase C beta (PKC-β, PRKCB) are phosphorylated by PLCγ1 and, in turn, phosphorylate CARD11, a component of the CBM complex(68). The N-terminal pseudosubstrate region of PKC inhibits the C-terminal kinase domain via the Asn-Phe-Asp (NFD) motif. Receptor stimulation recruits PKC to the cell membrane via two interactions: the C2 domain binding to Ca2+ and phospholipids and DAG binding to the C1 domains(68). Normally, the C1b domain sequesters p.F629 of the NFD domain and prevents its projection into the ATP binding site. DAG engagement of the C1 domain frees p.F629 to participate in hydrolysis (Figure 2I)(69).

PKC-θ and PKC-β are mutated in CTCL and ATL (Figure 1)(28, 70). PRKCQ is amplified in 30% of CTCL, leading to increased STAT3 and NFAT activation(70, 71). PRKCB is mutated in 33% of ATL and 1% of CTCL, with more than 90% of mutations clustering in the enzymatic domain (Figure 2H)(72). D427 and D630 mutations obviates the need for activation by upstream kinases(72). The p.D427 residue is near p.Y422 and p.Y430 that stabilize the C1b-NFD interaction and the p.D630 residue is within the NFD motif; destabilization of either of these regions causes activation(72). PRKCB p.D427N thus increases IκB kinase (IKK) phosphorylation and subsequent downstream NF-κB transcription(28).

The CBM Complex

Caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 1 (CARD11/CARMA1) is a scaffolding protein containing an N-terminal caspase activation and recruitment (CARD) domain, coiled-coil domain, linker domain, PDZ domain, and a membrane associated guanylate kinase (MAGUK)(73). CARD11 is auto-inhibited by an interface involving the linker and coiled-coil domains(74). Activated PKC phosphorylates the inhibitory domains (IDs) located near the linker region and disrupt the inhibitory interface that sequesters the CARD domain (Figure 2K)(75, 76). The open CARD11 scaffold can recruit its binding partners BCL10 and MALT1 to form a stable oligomeric complex with additional enzymes and scaffolding proteins. For example, it attracts and polyubiquitinates TRAF6 at the SH3/PDZ domain(76, 77).

CARD11 point mutations in TCLs occur in the linker, coiled-coil, and inhibitory domains (Figure 2J). They are present in 24% of ATL and 2–5% of AITL, CTCL, and PTCL-NOS (Figure 1)(28, 29, 40, 70, 78). Copy number gains often accompany CARD11 mutations; 12% of ATL have gene amplifications and recurrent small intragenic deletions in the inhibitory domains(28). Mutations at the coiled-coil and linker regions typically disrupt the autoinhibitory interaction increase response and increase NF-κB activity following TCR signaling(28, 40, 78). For example, a mouse model of the ATL p.E626K mutation was sufficient to activate NF-κB biochemically, leading to effector/memory and regulatory T cells activation and local tissue destruction(79).

RLTPR

RLTPR is a scaffolding protein that bridges CD28 to the CARD11 adaptor (Figure 1)(63). It has no enzymatic domains. Instead, it harbors an essential PH domain, leucine-rich repeat (LRR), and proline-rich region (PRR); the LRR is necessary for colocalization with CARD11(63). The PRR mediates signals from CD28 through attachments involving GRB2/GRAP2(80). Functional RLTPR is essential for differentiation into TH1, TH17, and Treg cells(80, 81). RLTPR mutations (found in 3% of CTCL and 8% of ATL) cluster at p.Q575, with is located on the surface-exposed, convex side of the LRR region(19, 49). p.Q575E dramatically increases association with CARD11(62). However, in the absence of TCR activation, it does not appear to functionally alter the cell. For example, p.Q575E augments gene transcription (e.g., NF-κB activity) and IL-2 production only in cells stimulated with chemical TCR mimics but not in unstimulated controls(49, 64). These data suggest CTCLs must undergo repeated chronic or tonic TCR stimulation to provide selection pressure for its recurrence rate(49, 64).

CSNK1A1

CSNK1A1 encodes casein kinase 1a, a serine/threonine kinase that consists of an N-terminal catalytic domain coupled to a C-terminal variable region(82). It has dual function in T cells: it first associates with the CBM complex following TCR engagement to recruit IKK to phosphorylate IκB and activate NF-κB; then, it phosphorylates and inactivates CARD11 to attenuate signaling (83). CSNK1A1 has recurrent mutations in CTCL and ATL at p.S27 (p.S27F/C)(62). These alterations occur at the tip of the phosphate binding, glycine-rich P-loop in the kinase domain of CK1a(62). The P-loop is a structure shared by protein kinases that normally blocks binding of the peptide substrate to the active site residues and is relieved by phosphorylation(84). In lung cancer, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in the P-loop domain, which share a similar function, result in enhanced kinase activity(85). These mutations cause increased expression of IL-2 in response to TCR stimulation with CD86 co-stimulation in Jurkat cells, suggesting they potentiate its pro-NF-κB signaling(62).

Costimulatory Molecules

CD28

CD28 belongs to a family of surface receptors, including cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) and inducible costimulator (ICOS), that are covalent homodimers with immunoglobulin domains attached to transmembrane and cytoplasmic tyrosine signaling motifs(86). It is a co-stimulatory receptor that binds to the ligands CD80 (B7.1) or CD86 (B7.2) for full proliferation and cytokine production following TCR engagement(87). CD28 and ICOS contain activating tyrosine domains, while CTLA4 contain inhibitory tyrosine domains; the balance between these signals governs T cell phenotype(88). CTLA4 interacts with two CD86 molecules and has 50–100 times higher binding affinity for CD86 than CD28, which only binds one CD86 molecule(89).

CD28 point mutations occur in 13% of AITL and 2–4% of ATL and CTCL (Figure 1). A subset of the CD28 mutations combine properties of the extracellular domain of CTLA-4 with the intracellular activating domains of CD28. First, there are CTLA4-CD28 fusions which link the CTLA4 extracellular domain to the CD28 intracellular domain(28, 90). Second, there are point mutations that make CD28 more avid for their ligands and thus their extracellular domain more CTLA-4-like. For example, there are three highly conserved residues between CD28 and CTLA4 in analogous positions of the C beta strand(86). p.F51V in CTCL and ATL modify the Glu-Phe-Arg residues on the C beta strand of the IgV domain in CD28 to mimic the Glu-Val-Arg residues on the C beta strand of IgV domain in CTLA-4(28, 70, 86). This substitution increases mutant CD28’s avidity for CD86 but not for CD80(28, 70).

Intracellular mutations, e.g., p.T195P/I in AITL, ATL, and PTCL-NOS, are located between the SH2 binding motif and the SH3 binding motif near the C-terminus. They increase the affinity of CD28 for the adaptor proteins GRB2 and GRB2-related adaptor protein 2 (GADS/GRAP2) compared to wild-type CD28(28, 91). This leads to increased ligand-dependent NF-κB activity and cytokine expression in Jurkat cells(91).

Inhibitors of TCR Signaling

PD1/PD-L1

Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) is an inhibitory receptor on activated T cells that engages the ligands PD-L1 and/or PD-L2. It inhibits TCR and CD28 activation biochemically and phenotypically promotes T cell dysfunction associated with chronic TCR activation, colloquially called T cell exhaustion(92). Unlike costimulatory proteins, PD1 has intramembrane domain with immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif (ITIM) and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based switch motif (ITSM) domains that recruit tyrosine phosphatases, which dephosphorylate enzymes critical for TCR signaling, i.e., ZAP70, LCK, and PI3K(93).

Deletions and pharmacologic inhibition have demonstrated PD1 acts as a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor in TCLs(94). PDCD1 damaging mutations are present in 23% of mature T cell neoplasms (Figure 1)(94). PD1 inactivating mutations contribute to the development of aggressive and serially transplantable lymphomas in mouse models(94). In patients, PD1 loss is associated with increased clinical stage of disease and shorter survival in CTCL(95). Mechanistically, CTCLs with PDCD1 gene locus deletions have decreased exhaustion and increased proliferation compared to PD1-wild type samples(95). Highlighting its role as a tumor suppressor, PD1 blockade with a blocking antibody (nivolumab) in acute, smoldering, and chronic ATL led to rapid disease progression(96).

TNFAIP3

Tumor necrosis factor-α-induced protein 3 (TNFAIP3/A20), is a negative regulator of the NF-κB signaling pathway that contains an N-terminal deubiquitinating enzyme targeting K63 polyubiquitin chains and a C-terminus zinc finger domain that ubiquitinylates at p.K48(97). p.K63 polyubiquitinated TRAF6 and RIP serve as scaffolds for ubiquitin-binding domain proteins and recruit transforming growth factor beta-activated kinase (TAK1) and IκB kinase (IκK) to activate NF-κB; TNFAIP3 removes p.K63 polyubiquitination while ubiquitinating at p.K48, which decreases NF-κB activity(98). TNFAIP3 is a transcriptional target of NF-κB, and is thought to act in a negative feedback mechanism to terminate NF-κB signaling(99). TNFAIP3 is deleted in 25% of CTCL (Figure 1); deletion of one copy abrogates the need for CD28 co-stimulation and causes hyperproliferation following TCR stimulation(70, 100, 101).

Transcription Factors Downstream of TCR Signaling

NF-κB

Gain-of-function mutations in the TCR pathway (CARD11(78), CD28(91), PLCG1(40), and RLTPR(62)) activate NF-κB. The NF-κB subunit family includes p50 and its precursor p105 (NFKB1), p52 and its precursor p100 (NFKB2), RelA (p65), RelB, and c-Rel(102). Each subunit has a Rel homology region, containing an N-terminus domain, a dimerization domain, and a C-terminus nuclear localization signal(103). The transcription activation domain is present in RelA, RelB, and c-Rel; NF-κB dimers containing one of these three subunits is required for transcription activation(104, 105). IκB family members contain a series of six ankyrin repeats that mask the nuclear localization signal of the NF-κB heterodimers, sequestering them in the cytoplasm. IκB phosphorylation by the IκK complex during T cell activation targets IκB for degradation, allowing NF-κB heterodimers to interact with their target DNA sequences(103, 106, 107). Notably, p105 and p100 also contain C-terminal ankyrin repeats that act as IκB domains, which sequester the full-length protein in the cytoplasm. With IκK activation, this part of the protein is ubiquitinated and degraded by the proteasome, enabling the N-terminus p50 or p52 to translocate to the nucleus(108, 109).

NF-κB transcription factors can themselves be mutated. Structural alterations of NF-κB subunits increase proliferation and survival in CTCL and ATL in a cell-intrinsic manner(72, 95). C-terminal truncations or splice site mutations of NFKB2 are found in 12.5% of CTCL (especially in late-stage leukemic disease)(62, 70). They simulate constitutive degradation of the C-terminal IκB like domains and free NFKB2 from cytoplasmic sequestration, causing constitutive nuclear localization and activation of the non-canonical NF-κB pathway(70, 110).

ZEB1

Zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1) is a transcriptional repressor. It is an oncogene involved with epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), metastasis, and drug resistance in many epithelial cancers(111, 112). However, it appears to be a tumor suppressor in TCLs(113115). For example, ZEB1 is deleted or subjected to inactivating point mutations in 65% of CTCL(70). ZEB1 has many putative immunologically relevant mechanisms inferred from older studies performed on T cell lines. However, in mouse and human primary T cells, ZEB1 appears to be mostly necessary for Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) dependent TH1/TH17 fate determination and suppression of TH2 differentiation(116119). The mechanisms by which ZEB1 supports lymphomagenesis is not clear, but ZEB1 inactivating mutations may affect the immunophenotype of the lymphomas, i.e., the cytokines produced by the lymphoma cells(120).

IRF4

The c-Rel/NF-κB complex binds to the IRF4 promoter upon TCR stimulation(121). Interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) is a transcription factor essential for metabolic reprogramming in T cell proliferation. It is also critical for the TH1, TH2, TH9, TH17, and Tfh lineages, making its role in lymphomagenesis is unclear(122124). It consists of a DNA binding domain, a linker domain, and an interferon association domain(125). Point mutations and translocations in IRF4 in TCLs overexpress or increase activity of IRF4. In ATL, a mutation in IRF4 occurs at the highly conserved p.K59. p.K59R preserves the DNA binding function but prevents ubiquitination, leading to increased protein half-life and increased activity(125). Expression of p.K59R in murine bone marrow cells caused T cell proliferation(125).

BACH2

Broad complex-tramtrack-bric a brac and Cap’n’collar homology 2 (BACH2) is a transcription factor that limits the expression of TCR-driven genes by reducing the accessibility of AP-1(126). BACH2 was first described as a novel tumor suppressor in CTCL(127). It is mutated in 14% of CTCL samples via intragenic translocations that uncouple its coding sequences from its promoter or via transposon insertions in the BACH2 gene locus(95). This appears clinically relevant as the gene is inactivated in 25% of lymphomas that develop from chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-Ts)(128). These invariably decreased BACH2 expression and were linked to higher rates of development into CAR-T cell lymphomas(127). It remains unclear if the prevalence of these mutation in CAR-T derived lymphomas were due to selection for BACH2 insertion or as a preference for insertion in the region(127).

Conclusions

Integrated genomic analyses of TCLs have revealed recurrent mutations in the TCR signaling pathways. Often, mutations share similar mechanisms, such as loss of inhibitory domains, disruption of intramolecular interactions, and increased catalytic activity. The phenotypic manifestations of T cell neoplasms are a direct consequence of the cell of origin, specific genetic derangements, and nearby cell signals. Certain mutations appear to be disease defining, e.g., RHOA p.G17V for AITL. These appear to be sufficient to affect the immunophenotype of the malignant T cell leading to clinically relevant inflammation. In summary, human T cell lymphomas offer a human genetic model system to study the regulation of TCR-associated molecules and their functional importance. Although much has been learned biochemically in experimental systems, how these mutations affect primary cells in their native microenvironments remains unclear. Spatial transcriptomics and single-cell studies of these lymphomas may reveal fundamental insights on immune cell interactions. Cell lines and mouse models that capture specific immunophenotypes may be generated to explore effector interactions that cause pathology. Lastly, further studies will be required combining understanding of tumor biology with biochemistry to elucidate mechanisms that can be targeted to benefit patients with these diseases.

1. J.C. was supported, in part, by an American Cancer Society Research Scholar Award, Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, Chicago Biomedical Consortium, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Extramural Activities, the Skin Cancer Foundation, the Leukemia Research Foundation, the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, and the Damon Runyon Foundation.

Abbreviations used:

TCR

T cell receptor

TCLs

T cell lymphomas

AITL

angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma

ALCL

anaplastic large cell lymphoma

ATL

adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma

PTCL-NOS

peripheral T cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified

TH1

T helper 1

TH2

T helper 2

TH17

T helper 17

Treg

regulatory T cell

CD3

cluster of differentiation 3

ITAM

immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif

MHC

major histocompatibility complex

PTK

protein tyrosine kinase

SH

Src homology

TK

tyrosine kinase

CBM

CARD11/BCL10/MALT1

NFD

Asn-Phe-Asp

IKK

IκB kinase

CARD11/CARMA1

caspase recruitment domain-containing protein 1

NF-κB

nuclear factor kappa-light-chain enhancer of activated B cells

mTOR

mammalian target of rapamycin

CSK

C-terminal Src kinase

PLCγ1

phospholipase C gamma

SYK

spleen tyrosine kinase

PIP2

phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate

IP3

inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate

DAG

diacylglycerol

AP-1

activator protein-1

GEF

guanine nucleotide exchange factor

CH

calponin homology

Ac

acidic

DH

Dbl homology

PH

plekstrin homology

ZF

zinc finger

JNK

c-Jun N-terminal kinase

NPM

nucleophosmin

ALK

anaplastic lymphoma kinase

PKC

protein kinase C

PKC-θ

protein kinase C theta

PKC-β

protein kinase C beta

CARD

caspase activation and recruitment

MAGUK

membrane associated guanylate kinase

ID

inhibitory domain

LRR

leucine rich repeat

PRR

proline-rich region

EGFR

epidermal growth factor receptor

CTLA4

cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4

ICOS

inducible costimulator

IL-2

interleukin-2

GRB2

growth factor receptor bound protein

GADS/GRAP2

GRB2-related adaptor protein 2

PD1

programmed cell death protein 1

ITIM

immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif

ITSM

immunoreceptor tyrosine-based switch motif

PTEN

phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10

TNFAIP3

tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced protein 3

TAK1

transforming growth factor beta-activated kinase

IκK

IκB kinase

ZEB1

zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1

EMT

epithelial-mesenchymal transition

JAK2

Janus kinase 2

HDAC

histone deacetylase

IRF4

interferon regulatory factor 4

BACH2

Broad complex-tramtrack-bric a brac and Cap’n’collar homology 2

CAR-T

chimeric antigen receptor T cell

References

  • 1.Van Arnam JS, Lim MS, and Elenitoba-Johnson KSJ. 2018. Novel insights into the pathogenesis of T-cell lymphomas. Blood 131: 2320–2330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Pileri SA, Harris NL, Stein H, Siebert R, Advani R, Ghielmini M, Salles GA, Zelenetz AD, and Jaffe ES. 2016. The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Blood 127: 2375–2390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.de Leval L, and Gaulard P. 2014. Cellular origin of T-cell lymphomas. Blood 123: 2909–2910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Iqbal J, Wright G, Wang C, Rosenwald A, Gascoyne RD, Weisenburger DD, Greiner TC, Smith L, Guo S, Wilcox RA, Teh BT, Lim ST, Tan SY, Rimsza LM, Jaffe ES, Campo E, Martinez A, Delabie J, Braziel RM, Cook JR, Tubbs RR, Ott G, Geissinger E, Gaulard P, Piccaluga PP, Pileri SA, Au WY, Nakamura S, Seto M, Berger F, de Leval L, Connors JM, Armitage J, Vose J, Chan WC, and Staudt LM. 2014. Gene expression signatures delineate biological and prognostic subgroups in peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Blood 123: 2915–2923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.de Leval L, Rickman DS, Thielen C, Reynies A, Huang YL, Delsol G, Lamant L, Leroy K, Brière J, Molina T, Berger F, Gisselbrecht C, Xerri L, and Gaulard P. 2007. The gene expression profile of nodal peripheral T-cell lymphoma demonstrates a molecular link between angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) and follicular helper T (TFH) cells. Blood 109: 4952–4963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schleussner N, Merkel O, Costanza M, Liang HC, Hummel F, Romagnani C, Durek P, Anagnostopoulos I, Hummel M, Jöhrens K, Niedobitek A, Griffin PR, Piva R, Sczakiel HL, Woessmann W, Damm-Welk C, Hinze C, Stoiber D, Gillissen B, Turner SD, Kaergel E, von Hoff L, Grau M, Lenz G, Dörken B, Scheidereit C, Kenner L, Janz M, and Mathas S. 2018. The AP-1-BATF and -BATF3 module is essential for growth, survival and TH17/ILC3 skewing of anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Leukemia 32: 1994–2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Roncador G, Garcia JF, Garcia JF, Maestre L, Lucas E, Menarguez J, Ohshima K, Nakamura S, Banham AH, and Piris MA. 2005. FOXP3, a selective marker for a subset of adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma. Leukemia 19: 2247–2253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Amador C, Greiner TC, Heavican TB, Smith LM, Galvis KT, Lone W, Bouska A, D’Amore F, Pedersen MB, Pileri S, Agostinelli C, Feldman AL, Rosenwald A, Ott G, Mottok A, Savage KJ, de Leval L, Gaulard P, Lim ST, Ong CK, Ondrejka SL, Song J, Campo E, Jaffe ES, Staudt LM, Rimsza LM, Vose J, Weisenburger DD, Chan WC, and Iqbal J. 2019. Reproducing the molecular subclassification of peripheral T-cell lymphoma-NOS by immunohistochemistry. Blood 134: 2159–2170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Horna P, Moscinski LC, Sokol L, and Shao H. 2019. Naïve/memory T-cell phenotypes in leukemic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: Putative cell of origin overlaps disease classification. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 96: 234–241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Swerdlow SH, Jaffe ES, Brousset P, Chan JK, de Leval L, Gaulard P, Harris NL, Pileri S, and Weiss LM. 2014. Cytotoxic T-cell and NK-cell lymphomas: current questions and controversies. Am J Surg Pathol 38: e60–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cortés JR, and Palomero T. 2021. Biology and Molecular Pathogenesis of Mature T-Cell Lymphomas. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.de Bruin PC, Kummer JA, van der Valk P, van Heerde P, Kluin PM, Willemze R, Ossenkoppele GJ, Radaszkiewicz T, and Meijer CJ. 1994. Granzyme B-expressing peripheral T-cell lymphomas: neoplastic equivalents of activated cytotoxic T cells with preference for mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue localization. Blood 84: 3785–3791. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dong D, Zheng L, Lin J, Zhang B, Zhu Y, Li N, Xie S, Wang Y, Gao N, and Huang Z. 2019. Structural basis of assembly of the human T cell receptor-CD3 complex. Nature 573: 546–552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wieczorek M, Abualrous ET, Sticht J, Álvaro-Benito M, Stolzenberg S, Noé F, and Freund C. 2017. Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) Class I and MHC Class II Proteins: Conformational Plasticity in Antigen Presentation. Front Immunol 8: 292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Palacios EH, and Weiss A. 2004. Function of the Src-family kinases, Lck and Fyn, in T-cell development and activation. Oncogene 23: 7990–8000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yamaguchi H, and Hendrickson WA. 1996. Structural basis for activation of human lymphocyte kinase Lck upon tyrosine phosphorylation. Nature 384: 484–489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Resh MD 1999. Fatty acylation of proteins: new insights into membrane targeting of myristoylated and palmitoylated proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1451: 1–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Casulo C, O’Connor O, Shustov A, Fanale M, Friedberg JW, Leonard JP, Kahl BS, Little RF, Pinter-Brown L, Advani R, and Horwitz S. 2017. T-Cell Lymphoma: Recent Advances in Characterization and New Opportunities for Treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shah K, Al-Haidari A, Sun J, and Kazi JU. 2021. T cell receptor (TCR) signaling in health and disease. Signal Transduct Target Ther 6: 412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kent A, Longino NV, Christians A, and Davila E. 2021. Naturally Occurring Genetic Alterations in Proximal TCR Signaling and Implications for Cancer Immunotherapy. Front Immunol 12: 658611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hwang JR, Byeon Y, Kim D, and Park SG. 2020. Recent insights of T cell receptor-mediated signaling pathways for T cell activation and development. Exp Mol Med 52: 750–761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Filby A, Seddon B, Kleczkowska J, Salmond R, Tomlinson P, Smida M, Lindquist JA, Schraven B, and Zamoyska R. 2007. Fyn regulates the duration of TCR engagement needed for commitment to effector function. J Immunol 179: 4635–4644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Salmond RJ, Filby A, Qureshi I, Caserta S, and Zamoyska R. 2009. T-cell receptor proximal signaling via the Src-family kinases, Lck and Fyn, influences T-cell activation, differentiation, and tolerance. Immunol Rev 228: 9–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Palomero T, Couronne L, Khiabanian H, Kim MY, Ambesi-Impiombato A, Perez-Garcia A, Carpenter Z, Abate F, Allegretta M, Haydu JE, Jiang X, Lossos IS, Nicolas C, Balbin M, Bastard C, Bhagat G, Piris MA, Campo E, Bernard OA, Rabadan R, and Ferrando AA. 2014. Recurrent mutations in epigenetic regulators, RHOA and FYN kinase in peripheral T cell lymphomas. Nat Genet 46: 166–170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Meng Y, and Roux B. 2014. Locking the active conformation of c-Src kinase through the phosphorylation of the activation loop. J Mol Biol 426: 423–435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Au-Yeung BB, Deindl S, Hsu LY, Palacios EH, Levin SE, Kuriyan J, and Weiss A. 2009. The structure, regulation, and function of ZAP-70. Immunol Rev 228: 41–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fajer M, Meng Y, and Roux B. 2017. The Activation of c-Src Tyrosine Kinase: Conformational Transition Pathway and Free Energy Landscape. J Phys Chem B 121: 3352–3363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kataoka K, Nagata Y, Kitanaka A, Shiraishi Y, Shimamura T, Yasunaga J, Totoki Y, Chiba K, Sato-Otsubo A, Nagae G, Ishii R, Muto S, Kotani S, Watatani Y, Takeda J, Sanada M, Tanaka H, Suzuki H, Sato Y, Shiozawa Y, Yoshizato T, Yoshida K, Makishima H, Iwanaga M, Ma G, Nosaka K, Hishizawa M, Itonaga H, Imaizumi Y, Munakata W, Ogasawara H, Sato T, Sasai K, Muramoto K, Penova M, Kawaguchi T, Nakamura H, Hama N, Shide K, Kubuki Y, Hidaka T, Kameda T, Nakamaki T, Ishiyama K, Miyawaki S, Yoon SS, Tobinai K, Miyazaki Y, Takaori-Kondo A, Matsuda F, Takeuchi K, Nureki O, Aburatani H, Watanabe T, Shibata T, Matsuoka M, Miyano S, Shimoda K, and Ogawa S. 2015. Integrated molecular analysis of adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma. Nat Genet 47: 1304–1315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Watatani Y, Sato Y, Miyoshi H, Sakamoto K, Nishida K, Gion Y, Nagata Y, Shiraishi Y, Chiba K, Tanaka H, Zhao L, Ochi Y, Takeuchi Y, Takeda J, Ueno H, Kogure Y, Shiozawa Y, Kakiuchi N, Yoshizato T, Nakagawa MM, Nanya Y, Yoshida K, Makishima H, Sanada M, Sakata-Yanagimoto M, Chiba S, Matsuoka R, Noguchi M, Hiramoto N, Ishikawa T, Kitagawa J, Nakamura N, Tsurumi H, Miyazaki T, Kito Y, Miyano S, Shimoda K, Takeuchi K, Ohshima K, Yoshino T, Ogawa S, and Kataoka K. 2019. Molecular heterogeneity in peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified revealed by comprehensive genetic profiling. Leukemia 33: 2867–2883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Brown K, Long JM, Vial SC, Dedi N, Dunster NJ, Renwick SB, Tanner AJ, Frantz JD, Fleming MA, and Cheetham GM. 2004. Crystal structures of interleukin-2 tyrosine kinase and their implications for the design of selective inhibitors. J Biol Chem 279: 18727–18732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gibson S, Leung B, Squire JA, Hill M, Arima N, Goss P, Hogg D, and Mills GB. 1993. Identification, cloning, and characterization of a novel human T-cell-specific tyrosine kinase located at the hematopoietin complex on chromosome 5q. Blood 82: 1561–1572. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bogin Y, Ainey C, Beach D, and Yablonski D. 2007. SLP-76 mediates and maintains activation of the Tec family kinase ITK via the T cell antigen receptor-induced association between SLP-76 and ITK. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 6638–6643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hawkins J, and Marcy A. 2001. Characterization of Itk tyrosine kinase: contribution of noncatalytic domains to enzymatic activity. Protein Expr Purif 22: 211–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Devkota S, Joseph RE, Min L, Bruce Fulton D, and Andreotti AH. 2015. Scaffold Protein SLP-76 Primes PLCγ1 for Activation by ITK-Mediated Phosphorylation. J Mol Biol 427: 2734–2747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rigby S, Huang Y, Streubel B, Chott A, Du MQ, Turner SD, and Bacon CM. 2009. The lymphoma-associated fusion tyrosine kinase ITK-SYK requires pleckstrin homology domain-mediated membrane localization for activation and cellular transformation. J Biol Chem 284: 26871–26881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pechloff K, Holch J, Ferch U, Schweneker M, Brunner K, Kremer M, Sparwasser T, Quintanilla-Martinez L, Zimber-Strobl U, Streubel B, Gewies A, Peschel C, and Ruland J. 2010. The fusion kinase ITK-SYK mimics a T cell receptor signal and drives oncogenesis in conditional mouse models of peripheral T cell lymphoma. J Exp Med 207: 1031–1044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bunney TD, Esposito D, Mas-Droux C, Lamber E, Baxendale RW, Martins M, Cole A, Svergun D, Driscoll PC, and Katan M. 2012. Structural and functional integration of the PLCγ interaction domains critical for regulatory mechanisms and signaling deregulation. Structure 20: 2062–2075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Patel VM, Flanagan CE, Martins M, Jones CL, Butler RM, Woollard WJ, Bakr FS, Yoxall A, Begum N, Katan M, Whittaker SJ, and Mitchell TJ. 2020. Frequent and Persistent PLCG1 Mutations in Sezary Cells Directly Enhance PLCgamma1 Activity and Stimulate NFkappaB, AP-1, and NFAT Signaling. J Invest Dermatol 140: 380–389 e384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Liu Y, Bunney TD, Khosa S, Macé K, Beckenbauer K, Askwith T, Maslen S, Stubbs C, de Oliveira TM, Sader K, Skehel M, Gavin AC, Phillips C, and Katan M. 2020. Structural insights and activating mutations in diverse pathologies define mechanisms of deregulation for phospholipase C gamma enzymes. EBioMedicine 51: 102607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Vallois D, Dobay MP, Morin RD, Lemonnier F, Missiaglia E, Juilland M, Iwaszkiewicz J, Fataccioli V, Bisig B, Roberti A, Grewal J, Bruneau J, Fabiani B, Martin A, Bonnet C, Michielin O, Jais JP, Figeac M, Bernard OA, Delorenzi M, Haioun C, Tournilhac O, Thome M, Gascoyne RD, Gaulard P, and de Leval L. 2016. Activating mutations in genes related to TCR signaling in angioimmunoblastic and other follicular helper T-cell-derived lymphomas. Blood 128: 1490–1502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Vaqué JP, Gómez-López G, Monsálvez V, Varela I, Martínez N, Pérez C, Domínguez O, Graña O, Rodríguez-Peralto JL, Rodríguez-Pinilla SM, González-Vela C, Rubio-Camarillo M, Martín-Sánchez E, Pisano DG, Papadavid E, Papadaki T, Requena L, García-Marco JA, Méndez M, Provencio M, Hospital M, Suárez-Massa D, Postigo C, San Segundo D, López-Hoyos M, Ortiz-Romero PL, Piris MA, and Sánchez-Beato M. 2014. PLCG1 mutations in cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. Blood 123: 2034–2043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hajicek N, Keith NC, Siraliev-Perez E, Temple BR, Huang W, Zhang Q, Harden TK, and Sondek J. 2019. Structural basis for the activation of PLC-gamma isozymes by phosphorylation and cancer-associated mutations. Elife 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Koss H, Bunney TD, Behjati S, and Katan M. 2014. Dysfunction of phospholipase Cγ in immune disorders and cancer. Trends Biochem Sci 39: 603–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Patel VM, Flanagan CE, Martins M, Jones CL, Butler RM, Woollard WJ, Bakr FS, Yoxall A, Begum N, Katan M, Whittaker SJ, and Mitchell TJ. 2020. Frequent and Persistent PLCG1 Mutations in Sézary Cells Directly Enhance PLCγ1 Activity and Stimulate NFκB, AP-1, and NFAT Signaling. J Invest Dermatol 140: 380–389.e384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kiel MJ, Sahasrabuddhe AA, Rolland DCM, Velusamy T, Chung F, Schaller M, Bailey NG, Betz BL, Miranda RN, Porcu P, Byrd JC, Medeiros LJ, Kunkel SL, Bahler DW, Lim MS, and Elenitoba-Johnson KSJ. 2015. Genomic analyses reveal recurrent mutations in epigenetic modifiers and the JAK-STAT pathway in Sezary syndrome. Nat Commun 6: 8470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bustelo XR 2000. Regulatory and signaling properties of the Vav family. Mol Cell Biol 20: 1461–1477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yu B, Martins IR, Li P, Amarasinghe GK, Umetani J, Fernandez-Zapico ME, Billadeau DD, Machius M, Tomchick DR, and Rosen MK. 2010. Structural and energetic mechanisms of cooperative autoinhibition and activation of Vav1. Cell 140: 246–256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Barreira M, Fabbiano S, Couceiro JR, Torreira E, Martínez-Torrecuadrada JL, Montoya G, Llorca O, and Bustelo XR. 2014. The C-Terminal SH3 Domain Contributes to the Intramolecular Inhibition of Vav Family Proteins. Science Signaling 7: ra35-ra35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Robles-Valero J, Fernández-Nevado L, Lorenzo-Martín LF, Cuadrado M, Fernández-Pisonero I, Rodríguez-Fdez S, Astorga-Simón EN, Abad A, Caloto R, and Bustelo XR. 2021. Cancer-associated mutations in VAV1 trigger variegated signaling outputs and T-cell lymphomagenesis. Embo j 40: e108125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Abate F, da Silva-Almeida AC, Zairis S, Robles-Valero J, Couronne L, Khiabanian H, Quinn SA, Kim MY, Laginestra MA, Kim C, Fiore D, Bhagat G, Piris MA, Campo E, Lossos IS, Bernard OA, Inghirami G, Pileri S, Bustelo XR, Rabadan R, Ferrando AA, and Palomero T. 2017. Activating mutations and translocations in the guanine exchange factor VAV1 in peripheral T-cell lymphomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114: 764–769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Boddicker RL, Razidlo GL, Dasari S, Zeng Y, Hu G, Knudson RA, Greipp PT, Davila JI, Johnson SH, Porcher JC, Smadbeck JB, Eckloff BW, Billadeau DD, Kurtin PJ, McNiven MA, Link BK, Ansell SM, Cerhan JR, Asmann YW, Vasmatzis G, and Feldman AL. 2016. Integrated mate-pair and RNA sequencing identifies novel, targetable gene fusions in peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Blood 128: 1234–1245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Fujisawa M, Sakata-Yanagimoto M, Nishizawa S, Komori D, Gershon P, Kiryu M, Tanzima S, Fukumoto K, Enami T, Muratani M, Yoshida K, Ogawa S, Matsue K, Nakamura N, Takeuchi K, Izutsu K, Fujimoto K, Teshima T, Miyoshi H, Gaulard P, Ohshima K, and Chiba S. 2018. Activation of RHOA-VAV1 signaling in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma. Leukemia 32: 694–702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Cortes JR, Filip I, Albero R, Patiño-Galindo JA, Quinn SA, Lin WW, Laurent AP, Shih BB, Brown JA, Cooke AJ, Mackey A, Einson J, Zairis S, Rivas-Delgado A, Laginestra MA, Pileri S, Campo E, Bhagat G, Ferrando AA, Rabadan R, and Palomero T. 2022. Oncogenic Vav1-Myo1f induces therapeutically targetable macrophage-rich tumor microenvironment in peripheral T cell lymphoma. Cell Rep 39: 110695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ambrogio C, Martinengo C, Voena C, Tondat F, Riera L, di Celle PF, Inghirami G, and Chiarle R. 2009. NPM-ALK oncogenic tyrosine kinase controls T-cell identity by transcriptional regulation and epigenetic silencing in lymphoma cells. Cancer Res 69: 8611–8619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bai RY, Ouyang T, Miething C, Morris SW, Peschel C, and Duyster J. 2000. Nucleophosmin-anaplastic lymphoma kinase associated with anaplastic large-cell lymphoma activates the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt antiapoptotic signaling pathway. Blood 96: 4319–4327. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Marzec M, Zhang Q, Goradia A, Raghunath PN, Liu X, Paessler M, Wang HY, Wysocka M, Cheng M, Ruggeri BA, and Wasik MA. 2008. Oncogenic kinase NPM/ALK induces through STAT3 expression of immunosuppressive protein CD274 (PD-L1, B7-H1). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 20852–20857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Pearson JD, Lee JK, Bacani JT, Lai R, and Ingham RJ. 2012. NPM-ALK: The Prototypic Member of a Family of Oncogenic Fusion Tyrosine Kinases. J Signal Transduct 2012: 123253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Staber PB, Vesely P, Haq N, Ott RG, Funato K, Bambach I, Fuchs C, Schauer S, Linkesch W, Hrzenjak A, Dirks WG, Sexl V, Bergler H, Kadin ME, Sternberg DW, Kenner L, and Hoefler G. 2007. The oncoprotein NPM-ALK of anaplastic large-cell lymphoma induces JUNB transcription via ERK1/2 and JunB translation via mTOR signaling. Blood 110: 3374–3383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Colomba A, Courilleau D, Ramel D, Billadeau DD, Espinos E, Delsol G, Payrastre B, and Gaits-Iacovoni F. 2008. Activation of Rac1 and the exchange factor Vav3 are involved in NPM-ALK signaling in anaplastic large cell lymphomas. Oncogene 27: 2728–2736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Nagata Y, Kontani K, Enami T, Kataoka K, Ishii R, Totoki Y, Kataoka TR, Hirata M, Aoki K, Nakano K, Kitanaka A, Sakata-Yanagimoto M, Egami S, Shiraishi Y, Chiba K, Tanaka H, Shiozawa Y, Yoshizato T, Suzuki H, Kon A, Yoshida K, Sato Y, Sato-Otsubo A, Sanada M, Munakata W, Nakamura H, Hama N, Miyano S, Nureki O, Shibata T, Haga H, Shimoda K, Katada T, Chiba S, Watanabe T, and Ogawa S. 2016. Variegated RHOA mutations in adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Blood 127: 596–604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lee GJ, Jun Y, Yoo HY, Jeon YK, Lee D, Lee S, and Kim J. 2020. Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma-like lymphadenopathy in mice transgenic for human RHOA with p.Gly17Val mutation. Oncoimmunology 9: 1746553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Park J, Yang J, Wenzel AT, Ramachandran A, Lee WJ, Daniels JC, Kim J, Martinez-Escala E, Amankulor N, Pro B, Guitart J, Mendillo ML, Savas JN, Boggon TJ, and Choi J. 2017. Genomic analysis of 220 CTCLs identifies a novel recurrent gain-of-function alteration in RLTPR (p.Q575E). Blood 130: 1430–1440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Sakata-Yanagimoto M, Enami T, Yoshida K, Shiraishi Y, Ishii R, Miyake Y, Muto H, Tsuyama N, Sato-Otsubo A, Okuno Y, Sakata S, Kamada Y, Nakamoto-Matsubara R, Tran NB, Izutsu K, Sato Y, Ohta Y, Furuta J, Shimizu S, Komeno T, Sato Y, Ito T, Noguchi M, Noguchi E, Sanada M, Chiba K, Tanaka H, Suzukawa K, Nanmoku T, Hasegawa Y, Nureki O, Miyano S, Nakamura N, Takeuchi K, Ogawa S, and Chiba S. 2014. Somatic RHOA mutation in angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma. Nat Genet 46: 171–175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Yoo HY, Sung MK, Lee SH, Kim S, Lee H, Park S, Kim SC, Lee B, Rho K, Lee JE, Cho KH, Kim W, Ju H, Kim J, Kim SJ, Kim WS, Lee S, and Ko YH. 2014. A recurrent inactivating mutation in RHOA GTPase in angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma. Nat Genet 46: 371–375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Alikhan M, Song JY, Sohani AR, Moroch J, Plonquet A, Duffield AS, Borowitz MJ, Jiang L, Bueso-Ramos C, Inamdar K, Menon MP, Gurbuxani S, Chan E, Smith SM, Nicolae A, Jaffe ES, Gaulard P, and Venkataraman G. 2016. Peripheral T-cell lymphomas of follicular helper T-cell type frequently display an aberrant CD3(-/dim)CD4(+) population by flow cytometry: an important clue to the diagnosis of a Hodgkin lymphoma mimic. Mod Pathol 29: 1173–1182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Witalis M, Chang J, Zhong MC, Bouklouch Y, Panneton V, Li J, Buch T, Kim SJ, Kim WS, Ko YH, Veillette A, and Suh WK. 2020. Progression of AITL-like tumors in mice is driven by Tfh signature proteins and T-B cross talk. Blood Adv 4: 868–879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Cortes JR, Ambesi-Impiombato A, Couronné L, Quinn SA, Kim CS, da Silva Almeida AC, West Z, Belver L, Martin MS, Scourzic L, Bhagat G, Bernard OA, Ferrando AA, and Palomero T. 2018. RHOA G17V Induces T Follicular Helper Cell Specification and Promotes Lymphomagenesis. Cancer Cell 33: 259–273.e257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Brezar V, Tu WJ, and Seddiki N. 2015. PKC-Theta in Regulatory and Effector T-cell Functions. Front Immunol 6: 530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kazanietz MG, and Lemmon MA. 2011. Protein kinase C regulation: C1 meets C-tail. Structure 19: 144–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Choi J, Goh G, Walradt T, Hong BS, Bunick CG, Chen K, Bjornson RD, Maman Y, Wang T, Tordoff J, Carlson K, Overton JD, Liu KJ, Lewis JM, Devine L, Barbarotta L, Foss FM, Subtil A, Vonderheid EC, Edelson RL, Schatz DG, Boggon TJ, Girardi M, and Lifton RP. 2015. Genomic landscape of cutaneous T cell lymphoma. Nat Genet 47: 1011–1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.García-Díaz N, Casar B, Alonso-Alonso R, Quevedo L, Rodríguez M, Ruso-Julve F, Esteve-Codina A, Gut M, Gru AA, González-Vela MC, Gut I, Rodriguez-Peralto JL, Varela I, Ortiz-Romero PL, Piris MA, and Vaqué JP. 2022. PLCγ1/PKCθ Downstream Signaling Controls Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Development and Progression. J Invest Dermatol 142: 1391–1400.e1315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kogure Y, Kameda T, Koya J, Yoshimitsu M, Nosaka K, Yasunaga JI, Imaizumi Y, Watanabe M, Saito Y, Ito Y, McClure MB, Tabata M, Shingaki S, Yoshifuji K, Chiba K, Okada A, Kakiuchi N, Nannya Y, Kamiunten A, Tahira Y, Akizuki K, Sekine M, Shide K, Hidaka T, Kubuki Y, Kitanaka A, Hidaka M, Nakano N, Utsunomiya A, Sica RA, Acuna-Villaorduna A, Janakiram M, Shah U, Ramos JC, Shibata T, Takeuchi K, Takaori-Kondo A, Miyazaki Y, Matsuoka M, Ishitsuka K, Shiraishi Y, Miyano S, Ogawa S, Ye BH, Shimoda K, and Kataoka K. 2022. Whole-genome landscape of adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Blood 139: 967–982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Roche MI, Ramadas RA, and Medoff BD. 2013. The role of CARMA1 in T cells. Crit Rev Immunol 33: 219–243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Cheng J, Maurer LM, Kang H, Lucas PC, and McAllister-Lucas LM. 2020. Critical protein-protein interactions within the CARMA1-BCL10-MALT1 complex: Take-home points for the cell biologist. Cell Immunol 355: 104158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Bedsaul JR, Carter NM, Deibel KE, Hutcherson SM, Jones TA, Wang Z, Yang C, Yang YK, and Pomerantz JL. 2018. Mechanisms of Regulated and Dysregulated CARD11 Signaling in Adaptive Immunity and Disease. Front Immunol 9: 2105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.David L, Li Y, Ma J, Garner E, Zhang X, and Wu H. 2018. Assembly mechanism of the CARMA1-BCL10-MALT1-TRAF6 signalosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115: 1499–1504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Sommer K, Guo B, Pomerantz JL, Bandaranayake AD, Moreno-García ME, Ovechkina YL, and Rawlings DJ. 2005. Phosphorylation of the CARMA1 linker controls NF-kappaB activation. Immunity 23: 561–574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.da Silva Almeida AC, Abate F, Khiabanian H, Martinez-Escala E, Guitart J, Tensen CP, Vermeer MH, Rabadan R, Ferrando A, and Palomero T. 2015. The mutational landscape of cutaneous T cell lymphoma and Sézary syndrome. Nat Genet 47: 1465–1470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Kameda T, Shide K, Kamiunten A, Yuki T, Sekine M, Akizuki K, Hidaka T, Kubuki Y, Sugiyama M, Morishita D, and Shimoda K. 2020. CARD11 Mutation Induces Oligoclonal Expansion of T-Cells, and Accelerates ATL Development in Combination with HBZ. Blood 136: 17–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Roncagalli R, Cucchetti M, Jarmuzynski N, Grégoire C, Bergot E, Audebert S, Baudelet E, Menoita MG, Joachim A, Durand S, Suchanek M, Fiore F, Zhang L, Liang Y, Camoin L, Malissen M, and Malissen B. 2016. The scaffolding function of the RLTPR protein explains its essential role for CD28 co-stimulation in mouse and human T cells. J Exp Med 213: 2437–2457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Yonkof JR, Gupta A, Rueda CM, Mangray S, Prince BT, Rangarajan HG, Alshahrani M, Varga E, Cripe TP, and Abraham RS. 2020. A Novel Pathogenic Variant in CARMIL2 (RLTPR) Causing CARMIL2 Deficiency and EBV-Associated Smooth Muscle Tumors. Front Immunol 11: 884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Mashhoon N, DeMaggio AJ, Tereshko V, Bergmeier SC, Egli M, Hoekstra MF, and Kuret J. 2000. Crystal structure of a conformation-selective casein kinase-1 inhibitor. J Biol Chem 275: 20052–20060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Bidère N, Ngo VN, Lee J, Collins C, Zheng L, Wan F, Davis RE, Lenz G, Anderson DE, Arnoult D, Vazquez A, Sakai K, Zhang J, Meng Z, Veenstra TD, Staudt LM, and Lenardo MJ. 2009. Casein kinase 1alpha governs antigen-receptor-induced NF-kappaB activation and human lymphoma cell survival. Nature 458: 92–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Kumar A, Petri ET, Halmos B, and Boggon TJ. 2008. Structure and clinical relevance of the epidermal growth factor receptor in human cancer. J Clin Oncol 26: 1742–1751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Gazdar AF, Shigematsu H, Herz J, and Minna JD. 2004. Mutations and addiction to EGFR: the Achilles ‘heal’ of lung cancers? Trends Mol Med 10: 481–486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Evans EJ, Esnouf RM, Manso-Sancho R, Gilbert RJ, James JR, Yu C, Fennelly JA, Vowles C, Hanke T, Walse B, Hünig T, Sørensen P, Stuart DI, and Davis SJ. 2005. Crystal structure of a soluble CD28-Fab complex. Nat Immunol 6: 271–279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Esensten JH, Helou YA, Chopra G, Weiss A, and Bluestone JA. 2016. CD28 Costimulation: From Mechanism to Therapy. Immunity 44: 973–988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Chen L, and Flies DB. 2013. Molecular mechanisms of T cell co-stimulation and co-inhibition. Nat Rev Immunol 13: 227–242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Stamper CC, Zhang Y, Tobin JF, Erbe DV, Ikemizu S, Davis SJ, Stahl ML, Seehra J, Somers WS, and Mosyak L. 2001. Crystal structure of the B7–1/CTLA-4 complex that inhibits human immune responses. Nature 410: 608–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Sekulic A, Liang WS, Tembe W, Izatt T, Kruglyak S, Kiefer JA, Cuyugan L, Zismann V, Legendre C, Pittelkow MR, Gohmann JJ, De Castro FR, Trent J, Carpten J, Craig DW, and McDaniel TK. 2015. Personalized treatment of Sézary syndrome by targeting a novel CTLA4:CD28 fusion. Mol Genet Genomic Med 3: 130–136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Rohr J, Guo S, Huo J, Bouska A, Lachel C, Li Y, Simone PD, Zhang W, Gong Q, Wang C, Cannon A, Heavican T, Mottok A, Hung S, Rosenwald A, Gascoyne R, Fu K, Greiner TC, Weisenburger DD, Vose JM, Staudt LM, Xiao W, Borgstahl GE, Davis S, Steidl C, McKeithan T, Iqbal J, and Chan WC. 2016. Recurrent activating mutations of CD28 in peripheral T-cell lymphomas. Leukemia 30: 1062–1070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Sharpe AH, and Pauken KE. 2018. The diverse functions of the PD1 inhibitory pathway. Nat Rev Immunol 18: 153–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Jubel JM, Barbati ZR, Burger C, Wirtz DC, and Schildberg FA. 2020. The Role of PD-1 in Acute and Chronic Infection. Front Immunol 11: 487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Wartewig T, Kurgyis Z, Keppler S, Pechloff K, Hameister E, Öllinger R, Maresch R, Buch T, Steiger K, Winter C, Rad R, and Ruland J. 2017. PD-1 is a haploinsufficient suppressor of T cell lymphomagenesis. Nature 552: 121–125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Park J, Daniels J, Wartewig T, Ringbloom KG, Martinez-Escala ME, Choi S, Thomas JJ, Doukas PG, Yang J, Snowden C, Law C, Lee Y, Lee K, Zhang Y, Conran C, Tegtmeyer K, Mo SH, Pease DR, Jothishankar B, Kwok PY, Abdulla FR, Pro B, Louissaint A, Boggon TJ, Sosman J, Guitart J, Rao D, Ruland J, and Choi J. 2021. Integrated genomic analyses of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas reveal the molecular bases for disease heterogeneity. Blood 138: 1225–1236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Ratner L, Waldmann TA, Janakiram M, and Brammer JE. 2018. Rapid Progression of Adult T-Cell Leukemia-Lymphoma after PD-1 Inhibitor Therapy. N Engl J Med 378: 1947–1948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Verstrepen L, Verhelst K, van Loo G, Carpentier I, Ley SC, and Beyaert R. 2010. Expression, biological activities and mechanisms of action of A20 (TNFAIP3). Biochem Pharmacol 80: 2009–2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Shembade N, and Harhaj EW. 2012. Regulation of NF-κB signaling by the A20 deubiquitinase. Cell Mol Immunol 9: 123–130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Krikos A, Laherty CD, and Dixit VM. 1992. Transcriptional activation of the tumor necrosis factor alpha-inducible zinc finger protein, A20, is mediated by kappa B elements. Journal of Biological Chemistry 267: 17971–17976. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Braun FC, Grabarczyk P, Mobs M, Braun FK, Eberle J, Beyer M, Sterry W, Busse F, Schroder J, Delin M, Przybylski GK, and Schmidt CA. 2011. Tumor suppressor TNFAIP3 (A20) is frequently deleted in Sezary syndrome. Leukemia 25: 1494–1501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Chen C, Chen Z, Huang L, Zhou L, Zhu L, Liu S, Luo G, Li W, Zeng C, and Li Y. 2021. TNFAIP3 mutation may be associated with favorable overall survival for patients with T-cell lymphoma. Cancer Cell Int 21: 490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Oeckinghaus A, and Ghosh S. 2009. The NF-kappaB family of transcription factors and its regulation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 1: a000034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Huxford T, and Ghosh G. 2009. A structural guide to proteins of the NF-kappaB signaling module. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 1: a000075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Ghosh G, and Wang VY. 2021. Origin of the Functional Distinctiveness of NF-κB/p52. Front Cell Dev Biol 9: 764164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Nolan GP, Fujita T, Bhatia K, Huppi C, Liou HC, Scott ML, and Baltimore D. 1993. The bcl-3 proto-oncogene encodes a nuclear I kappa B-like molecule that preferentially interacts with NF-kappa B p50 and p52 in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. Mol Cell Biol 13: 3557–3566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Rothwarf DM, Zandi E, Natoli G, and Karin M. 1998. IKK-gamma is an essential regulatory subunit of the IkappaB kinase complex. Nature 395: 297–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Whiteside ST, and Israël A. 1997. I kappa B proteins: structure, function and regulation. Semin Cancer Biol 8: 75–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Karin M 1999. How NF-kappaB is activated: the role of the IkappaB kinase (IKK) complex. Oncogene 18: 6867–6874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Qing G, Qu Z, and Xiao G. 2005. Regulation of NF-kappa B2 p100 processing by its cis-acting domain. J Biol Chem 280: 18–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Jost PJ, and Ruland J. 2007. Aberrant NF-kappaB signaling in lymphoma: mechanisms, consequences, and therapeutic implications. Blood 109: 2700–2707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Caprini E, Bresin A, Cristofoletti C, Helmer Citterich M, Tocco V, Scala E, Monopoli A, Benucci R, Narducci MG, and Russo G. 2018. Loss of the candidate tumor suppressor ZEB1 (TCF8, ZFHX1A) in Sézary syndrome. Cell Death Dis 9: 1178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Zhang Y, Xu L, Li A, and Han X. 2019. The roles of ZEB1 in tumorigenic progression and epigenetic modifications. Biomed Pharmacother 110: 400–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Aghdassi A, Sendler M, Guenther A, Mayerle J, Behn CO, Heidecke CD, Friess H, Büchler M, Evert M, Lerch MM, and Weiss FU. 2012. Recruitment of histone deacetylases HDAC1 and HDAC2 by the transcriptional repressor ZEB1 downregulates E-cadherin expression in pancreatic cancer. Gut 61: 439–448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Byles V, Zhu L, Lovaas JD, Chmilewski LK, Wang J, Faller DV, and Dai Y. 2012. SIRT1 induces EMT by cooperating with EMT transcription factors and enhances prostate cancer cell migration and metastasis. Oncogene 31: 4619–4629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Lindner P, Paul S, Eckstein M, Hampel C, Muenzner JK, Erlenbach-Wuensch K, Ahmed HP, Mahadevan V, Brabletz T, Hartmann A, Vera J, and Schneider-Stock R. 2020. EMT transcription factor ZEB1 alters the epigenetic landscape of colorectal cancer cells. Cell Death Dis 11: 147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Nakahata S, Yamazaki S, Nakauchi H, and Morishita K. 2010. Downregulation of ZEB1 and overexpression of Smad7 contribute to resistance to TGF-beta1-mediated growth suppression in adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Oncogene 29: 4157–4169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Williams TM, Moolten D, Burlein J, Romano J, Bhaerman R, Godillot A, Mellon M, Rauscher FJ 3rd, and Kant JA. 1991. Identification of a zinc finger protein that inhibits IL-2 gene expression. Science 254: 1791–1794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Drápela S, Bouchal J, Jolly MK, Culig Z, and Souček K. 2020. ZEB1: A Critical Regulator of Cell Plasticity, DNA Damage Response, and Therapy Resistance. Front Mol Biosci 7: 36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Qian Y, Arellano G, Ifergan I, Lin J, Snowden C, Kim T, Thomas JJ, Law C, Guan T, Balabanov RD, Kaech SM, Miller SD, and Choi J. 2021. ZEB1 promotes pathogenic Th1 and Th17 cell differentiation in multiple sclerosis. Cell Rep 36: 109602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Guenova E, Watanabe R, Teague JE, Desimone JA, Jiang Y, Dowlatshahi M, Schlapbach C, Schaekel K, Rook AH, Tawa M, Fisher DC, Kupper TS, and Clark RA. 2013. TH2 cytokines from malignant cells suppress TH1 responses and enforce a global TH2 bias in leukemic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res 19: 3755–3763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Grumont RJ, and Gerondakis S. 2000. Rel induces interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF-4) expression in lymphocytes: modulation of interferon-regulated gene expression by rel/nuclear factor kappaB. J Exp Med 191: 1281–1292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Tominaga N, Ohkusu-Tsukada K, Udono H, Abe R, Matsuyama T, and Yui K. 2003. Development of Th1 and not Th2 immune responses in mice lacking IFN-regulatory factor-4. Int Immunol 15: 1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Mahnke J, Schumacher V, Ahrens S, Käding N, Feldhoff LM, Huber M, Rupp J, Raczkowski F, and Mittrücker HW. 2016. Interferon Regulatory Factor 4 controls T(H1) cell effector function and metabolism. Sci Rep 6: 35521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Man K, Miasari M, Shi W, Xin A, Henstridge DC, Preston S, Pellegrini M, Belz GT, Smyth GK, Febbraio MA, Nutt SL, and Kallies A. 2013. The transcription factor IRF4 is essential for TCR affinity-mediated metabolic programming and clonal expansion of T cells. Nat Immunol 14: 1155–1165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Cherian MA, Olson S, Sundaramoorthi H, Cates K, Cheng X, Harding J, Martens A, Challen GA, Tyagi M, Ratner L, and Rauch D. 2018. An activating mutation of interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) in adult T-cell leukemia. J Biol Chem 293: 6844–6858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Roychoudhuri R, Clever D, Li P, Wakabayashi Y, Quinn KM, Klebanoff CA, Ji Y, Sukumar M, Eil RL, Yu Z, Spolski R, Palmer DC, Pan JH, Patel SJ, Macallan DC, Fabozzi G, Shih HY, Kanno Y, Muto A, Zhu J, Gattinoni L, O’Shea JJ, Okkenhaug K, Igarashi K, Leonard WJ, and Restifo NP. 2016. BACH2 regulates CD8(+) T cell differentiation by controlling access of AP-1 factors to enhancers. Nat Immunol 17: 851–860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Daniels J, and Choi J. 2021. BACH2 is a putative T-cell lymphoma tumor suppressor that may play a role in product-derived CAR T-cell lymphomas. Blood 138: 2731–2733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Micklethwaite KP, Gowrishankar K, Gloss BS, Li Z, Street JA, Moezzi L, Mach MA, Sutrave G, Clancy LE, Bishop DC, Louie RHY, Cai C, Foox J, MacKay M, Sedlazeck FJ, Blombery P, Mason CE, Luciani F, Gottlieb DJ, and Blyth E. 2021. Investigation of product-derived lymphoma following infusion of piggyBac-modified CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Blood 138: 1391–1405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Palomero T, Couronné L, Khiabanian H, Kim MY, Ambesi-Impiombato A, Perez-Garcia A, Carpenter Z, Abate F, Allegretta M, Haydu JE, Jiang X, Lossos IS, Nicolas C, Balbin M, Bastard C, Bhagat G, Piris MA, Campo E, Bernard OA, Rabadan R, and Ferrando AA. 2014. Recurrent mutations in epigenetic regulators, RHOA and FYN kinase in peripheral T cell lymphomas. Nat Genet 46: 166–170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Ou J, and Zhu LJ. 2019. trackViewer: a Bioconductor package for interactive and integrative visualization of multi-omics data. Nat Methods 16: 453–454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Hajicek N, Keith NC, Siraliev-Perez E, Temple BR, Huang W, Zhang Q, Harden TK, and Sondek J. 2019. Structural basis for the activation of PLC-γ isozymes by phosphorylation and cancer-associated mutations. Elife 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES