Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2023 Dec 28;12:e83103. doi: 10.7554/eLife.83103

Iron chelation improves ineffective erythropoiesis and iron overload in myelodysplastic syndrome mice

Wenbin An 1,2, Maria Feola 1, Maayan Levy 1, Srinivas Aluri 3, Marc Ruiz-Martinez 1, Ashwin Sridharan 3, Eitan Fibach 4, Xiaofan Zhu 2, Amit Verma 3, Yelena Ginzburg 1,
Editors: Yongliang Yang5, Caigang Liu6
PMCID: PMC10754500  PMID: 38153418

Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a heterogeneous group of bone marrow stem cell disorders characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis and cytopenias, most commonly anemia. Red cell transfusion therapy for anemia in MDS results in iron overload, correlating with reduced overall survival. Whether the treatment of iron overload benefits MDS patients remains controversial. We evaluate underlying iron-related pathophysiology and the effect of iron chelation using deferiprone on erythropoiesis in NUP98-HOXD13 transgenic mice, a highly penetrant well-established MDS mouse model. Our results characterize an iron overload phenotype with aberrant erythropoiesis in these mice which was reversed by deferiprone-treatment. Serum erythropoietin levels decreased while erythroblast erythropoietin receptor expression increased in deferiprone-treated MDS mice. We demonstrate, for the first time, normalized expression of the iron chaperones Pcbp1 and Ncoa4 and increased ferritin stores in late-stage erythroblasts from deferiprone-treated MDS mice, evidence of aberrant iron trafficking in MDS erythroblasts. Importantly, erythroblast ferritin is increased in response to deferiprone, correlating with decreased erythroblast ROS. Finally, we confirmed increased expression of genes involved in iron uptake, sensing, and trafficking in stem and progenitor cells from MDS patients. Taken together, our findings provide evidence that erythroblast-specific iron metabolism is a novel potential therapeutic target to reverse ineffective erythropoiesis in MDS.

Research organism: Mouse

Introduction

MDS is a heterogeneous group of bone marrow stem cell disorders characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis leading to blood cytopenias and increased incidence of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Haferlach, 2019; Janssen et al., 1989). In the United States, MDS affects approximately 100,000 people with a median age of 65 years at diagnosis and an incidence of 40/100,000 per year thereafter (Rollison et al., 2008; Goldberg et al., 2010). Most MDS patients suffer from the accumulating consequences of marrow failure compounded by other age-related diseases. Several categories of MDS patients are low-risk subtypes according to the revised International Prognostic Scoring System and have a longer median survival with the lowest rate of progression to AML (Greenberg et al., 2012; Arber et al., 2016). Low-risk MDS patients account for approximately two-thirds of all MDS patients with 30–50% requiring regular red blood cell (RBC) transfusions (Dayyani et al., 2010; Kröger, 2019). The main goals of therapy in low-risk MDS patients are to alleviate cytopenias and their associated symptoms and thereby improve quality of life (Hellström-Lindberg, 2005). RBC transfusions remain the mainstay of therapy in low-risk MDS (Oliva et al., 2010) and are the main source of progressive iron overload and consequent end-organ damage in transfusion-dependent patients. Because of the low rates of progression to AML in low-risk MDS patients, these patients have a substantial life expectancy and theoretically warrant screening for transfusional iron overload, known to increase morbidity and mortality in chronic RBC transfusion-dependent anemias (Goldberg et al., 2010; Schafer et al., 1981; Greenberg et al., 2009). Furthermore, although it is generally accepted that transfusional iron overload develops in low-risk transfusion-dependent MDS patients and methods to diagnose and treat iron overload are available, the risk-benefit ratio of treating iron overload in MDS patients remains controversial.

A correlation between iron overload and reduced survival has been demonstrated mostly by retrospective studies (Malcovati et al., 2006; Malcovati et al., 2011). RBC transfusion-dependence correlates strongly with decreased survival in MDS patients (Garcia-Manero et al., 2008; Malcovati et al., 2005), and MDS patients with elevated serum ferritin have significantly fewer Burst Forming Units (BFU-Es) but normal Granulocyte Macrophage Colony Forming Units (CFU-GM) (Hartmann et al., 2013). Iron overload has been shown to inhibit BFU-E colony formation and erythroblast differentiation in both murine and human hematopoietic progenitors in vitro (Taoka et al., 2012). Finally, cells exposed to excess iron exhibit dysplastic changes with increased intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and decreased expression of anti-apoptotic genes (Taoka et al., 2012), and the addition of iron to MDS patients’ peripheral blood mononuclear cells resulted in increased ROS and DNA damage, triggering apoptosis (Fibach and Rachmilewitz, 2012; Pan et al., 1999). These data suggest that iron overload may lead to a deleterious effect on hematopoiesis, worsening disease in MDS (Camaschella et al., 2007).

Along these lines, more recent studies demonstrate the potential benefit of iron chelation therapy on the overall survival in low-risk MDS patients. Iron chelation is associated with improved hemoglobin (Hb) and reduced RBC transfusion requirements in some patients (Oliva et al., 2010; Badawi et al., 2010). Most recently, the TELESTO trial demonstrated prolonged event-free survival in iron overloaded lower risk MDS patients treated with iron chelation (i.e. deferasirox) (Angelucci et al., 2020). However, no clear improvement in Hb or reduction in RBC transfusions and no effect on overall survival was observed in deferasirox-treated MDS patients. We anticipate that the lack of effect of deferasirox on erythropoiesis is a consequence of the specific iron chelator selected. Alternatively, unlike other commercially available iron chelators, deferiprone (DFP) has a lower iron binding affinity relative to transferrin (Sohn et al., 2008). As a consequence, the DFP iron chelating effect enables iron transfer from parenchymal cells to increase transferrin saturation which results in increase hepcidin expression in the liver in response to systemic iron (Schmidt et al., 2015; Casu et al., 2016). The physiologic effect of increased hepcidin responsiveness in turn prevents further iron absorption and recycling, decreasing iron availability for erythropoiesis. On the foundation of this knowledge, we hypothesize that in addition to decreasing the progression of systemic iron overload, DFP could also ameliorate ineffective erythropoiesis in MDS. A direct beneficial effect of DFP on erythropoiesis in MDS has yet to be demonstrated.

Here, we evaluate the effect of iron chelation on erythropoiesis in NUP98-HOXD13 transgenic (NHD13) mice as a well-established in vivo model of MDS. We use NHD13 mice because they replicate alterations in gene expression identified in MDS patients and are the most commonly used transgenic mouse models of MDS (Liu et al., 2022). More specifically, NHD13 mice are characterized by abortive erythroblast maturation and consequent ineffective erythropoiesis and are, therefore, of target interest in our search for a mechanistic understanding of ineffective erythropoiesis to target its amelioration (Lin et al., 2005; Slape et al., 2008). Lastly, NHD13 mice have been successfully used in pre-clinical studies to investigate the effects of an activin receptor II ligand trap on reversing ineffective erythropoiesis in MDS mice (Suragani et al., 2014).

Our results demonstrate that NHD13 mice exhibits anemia, increased serum erythropoietin (EPO), expanded erythropoiesis in the bone marrow and spleen, and parenchymal iron overload, consistent with a low-risk MDS phenotype in patients. In addition, we demonstrate decreased EPO-responsiveness, decreased erythroblast differentiation, and impaired enucleation in bone marrow erythroblasts from MDS mice. Furthermore, iron chelation with DFP, in addition to decreasing parenchymal iron deposition, restores hepdicin:iron responsiveness, partially reverses anemia, and normalizes serum EPO concentration in MDS mice. DFP-treated MDS mice also exhibit normalized erythroblast differentiation, expression of Gata1 and Epor (EPO receptor) as well as that of iron chaperones Pcbp1 and Ncoa4, and increased erythroblast ferritin concentration in bone marrow erythroblasts. Finally, we demonstrate aberrant expression of genes involved in iron uptake, sensing, and trafficking in MDS patient bone marrow stem and progenitor cells. Taken together, our data for the first time provides in vivo evidence that ineffective erythropoiesis in MDS mice is responsive to iron chelation with DFP, normalizing erythroblast iron trafficking and restoring EPO responsiveness to reverse anemia in MDS.

Results

MDS mice exhibit elevated mcv anemia with expanded erythropoiesis and iron overload, appropriate as a model of low-risk MDS

To establish the expected MDS phenotype, mice were sacrificed at 6 months of age and demonstrate significantly reduced RBC counts and Hb concentration, increased MCV, and no difference in reticulocyte count relative to WT controls (Table 1). MDS mice also exhibit decreased white blood cell (WBC) count and no difference in platelet count (Table 1). Consistently, our experiments also demonstrate that MDS mice exhibit significantly increased serum EPO concentration and increased bone marrow cellularity (Table 1). Furthermore, we demonstrate borderline increased apoptosis in bone marrow erythroblast in MDS mice, reaching significance in OrthoE (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). Finally, liver iron concentration is significantly increased in MDS mice (Table 1). In conjunction with previously published work (Lin et al., 2005; Slape et al., 2008; Suragani et al., 2014), this combination of characteristics provides substantial evidence that NHD13 mice are an appropriate mouse model for MDS (Cui et al., 2014).

Table 1. Hematopoiesis- and Iron-related Characteristics of NHD13 mice.

RBC count Hb MCV Retic count WBC count Platelet count Serum EPO Bone marrow cells Liver iron concentration
(units) (106 /μL) (g/dL) (fL) (106 /μL) (106 /μL) (103 /μL) (μg/μL) (107 cells) (mg/g dry weight)
WT 10±0.1 14.7±0.1 50±0.5 495±67 5.5±0.6 759±67 308±48 12.4±0.7 0.23±0.07
MDS 6.73±0.29 11.2±0.4 60±1.3 440±30 3.0±0.4 672±80 4832±1,154 15±0.8 0.51±0.04
*** *** *** NS ** NS *** * *

WT = wild type; MDS = myelodysplastic syndrome (NHD13) mice; RBC = red blood cell; Hb = hemoglobin; MCV = mean corpuscular hemoglobin; Retic = reticulocyte; WBC = white blood cell; EPO = erythropoietin; NS = not significant; * P<0.05; ** P<0.01; *** P<0.0001.

Iron chelation with DFP reverses iron overload, normalized erythroferrone expression in bone marrow erythroblasts, and improves hepcidin iron responsiveness in MDS mice

Next, we evaluate the effects of iron chelation with DFP in 5-month-old MDS mice, treated for 4 weeks with DFP and sacrificed for analyses at 6 months of age. First, we demonstrate that DFP can be detected in the serum of DFP-treated mice (Figure 1—figure supplement 2). Second, our results demonstrate that DFP-treated MDS mice exhibit increased serum iron concentration and transferrin saturation (Figure 1A and B); both male and female mice demonstrate equivalent responses to DFP (Figure 1—figure supplement 3). These findings are consistent with the reversal of increased parenchymal iron loading in MDS mice after DFP treatment, exhibiting decreased liver, spleen, and bone marrow non-heme iron concentration (Figure 1C–E) and validate the expected re-distribution of iron from parenchymal deposition to the circulating compartment, to ultimately enable excretion. Furthermore, ferritin concentration is not statistically significantly different in MDS or DFP-treated MDS bone marrow erythroblast-rich CD45 negative cells (Figure 1—figure supplement 4). Finally, Hamp expression, the gene encoding for hepcidin, in the liver is unchanged and Hamp-iron responsiveness is decreased in MDS relative to WT mice (Figure 1F and G). While Hamp expression is not increased in the liver of DFP-treated MDS mice (Figure 1F), it is significantly increased relative to non-heme iron concentration in the liver (Figure 1G) providing evidence of enhanced hepcidin responsiveness to iron in DFP-treated MDS mice.

Figure 1. DFP reverses parenchymal iron overload and restores hepcidin iron responsiveness in MDS mice.

DFP results in increased serum iron (A) and transferrin saturation (B) while reducing parenchymal iron in the liver, spleen, and bone marrow (C-E). While liver Hamp mRNA expression is unchanged in WT, MDS, and DFP-treated MDS mice (F), Hamp responsiveness to iron is normalized in DFP-treated MDS mice (G) (n=7–10 mice/group). (H) DFP results in more normal Erfe mRNA expression (n=10–12 mice/group) in sorted bone marrow erythroblasts from MDS mice analyzed after 1 month of treatment. *p<0.05 vs. WT; **p<0.01 vs. WT; ***p<0.001 vs. WT; ****p<0.0001 vs. WT; &p<0.05 vs. MDS; &&p<0.01 vs. MDS; &&&&p<0.0001 vs. MDS; Abbreviations: WT = wild type; MDS = myelodysplastic syndrome; DFP = deferiprone; Hamp = hepcidin; Erfe = erythroferrone.

Figure 1—source data 1. Source data for iron-related parameters in wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Erythroblast apoptosis in MDS mice.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

Bone marrow erythroblasts were isolated using flow gating strategy and apoptosis was measured using activated caspase 3/7. Erythroblast apoptosis is elevated in ProE, BasoE, PolyE, and OrthoE from MDS mice (n=9–11 mice/group). *p<0.05 vs. WT; **p<0.01 vs. WT; WT = wild type; MDS = myelodysplastic syndrome; ProE = pro-erythroblasts; BasoE = basophilic erythroblasts; PolyE = polychromatophilic erythroblasts; OrthoE = orthochromatophilic erythroblasts; Act casp 3/7=activated caspase 3 and 7.
Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Source data for flow analysis of apoptosis measured by activated caspase 3/7 in bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) mice.
Figure 1—figure supplement 2. Quantification of serum DFP concentration in DFP-treated WT and MDS mice.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2.

Serum DFP concentration is measurable in DFP-treated MDS mice. (n=3–5 mice/group). WT = wild type; MDS = myelodysplastic syndrome; DFP = deferiprone.
Figure 1—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Source data for serum deferiprone (DFP) concentration in DFP-treated wild type (WT) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) mice.
Figure 1—figure supplement 3. DFP resulted in similar effects on transferrin saturation in male and female MDS mice.

Figure 1—figure supplement 3.

Similarly elevated transferrin is observed in male and female DFP-treated MDS mice (n=3–4 male mice/group and n=4–6 female mice/group). *p<0.05 vs. control; Con = control; DFP = deferiprone; sat = saturation.
Figure 1—figure supplement 3—source data 1. Source data for transferrin saturation in male and female myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and DFP-treated MDS mice.
Figure 1—figure supplement 4. Bone marrow erythroblast ferritin is increased in DFP-treated MDS mice.

Figure 1—figure supplement 4.

(A) Western blot of bone marrow CD45 negative cell protein extracts demonstrate no difference in FTH1 between WT, MDS, and DFP-treated MDS mice; the gel is quantified in (B) (n=2 mice/group, experiments repeated twice). WT = wild type; MDS = myelodysplastic syndrome; DFP = deferiprone; FTH1 = ferritin heavy chain. &p<0.05 vs. MDS.
Figure 1—figure supplement 4—source data 1. Western blots with ferritin H antibody staining relative to actin in bone marrow erythroblast enriched CD45 negative cells from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.
Figure 1—figure supplement 4—source data 2. Source data for quantification of ferritin heavy chain (FTH1) protein concentration relative to actin in bone marrow erythroblast enriched CD45 negative cells from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.
Figure 1—figure supplement 5. Effects of DFP on the liver STAT3 expression in MDS mice.

Figure 1—figure supplement 5.

Western blot of liver protein extracts demonstrate no obvious differences in STAT3 signaling (A), and no differences in Saa1 mRNA expression (B), demonstrating no change in the inflammatory signaling pathway to hepcidin expression between WT, MDS, and DFP-treated MDS mice (n=3 mice/group). WT = wild type; MDS = myelodysplastic syndrome; DFP = deferiprone; pSTAT3=phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; GAPDH = glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; Saa1 = serum amyloid A1.
Figure 1—figure supplement 5—source data 1. Western blots with STAT3 and pSTAT3 antibody staining relative to GAPDH in liver from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.
Figure 1—figure supplement 5—source data 2. Source data for Saa1 in liver from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.
Figure 1—figure supplement 6. Effect of DFP on erythroblast Erfe expression in WT mice.

Figure 1—figure supplement 6.

Sorted bone marrow erythroblast Erfe mRNA expression between WT and DFP-treated WT mice (n=5–12 mice/group). *p<0.05 vs. WT DFP; WT = wild type; DFP = deferiprone; Erfe = erythroferrone.
Figure 1—figure supplement 6—source data 1. Source data for erythroferrone (Erfe) in sorted bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT) and DFP-treated WT mice.

Hepcidin expression represents the effect of multiple pathways. Specifically, hepcidin is upregulated in response to liver iron stores and circulating iron; increased in the setting of inflammation; and downregulated in conditions of expanded or ineffective erythropoiesis as a consequence of elevated Erfe expression, the gene name for erythroferrone (ERFE), in erythroblasts (Ginzburg, 2019). Our results demonstrate that DFP-treated MDS mice exhibit decreased liver iron concentration (Figure 1C) while increasing transferrin saturation (Figure 1B) and no evidence of inflammation-mediated signaling to hepcidin in DFP-treated MDS mouse liver (Figure 1—figure supplement 5). Thus, the effect of iron redistribution on hepcidin expression in DFP-treated MDS mice is predictably small, leading us to also evaluate the contribution of changes in erythropoiesis on increased hepcidin responsiveness in DFP-treated MDS mice.

Erythroblast Erfe expression is increased in MDS mouse bone marrow (Figure 1H), the response expected in the setting of increased serum EPO concentration (Kautz et al., 2014) in MDS relative to WT mice. Similar to other diseases of ineffective erythropoiesis, increased expression of bone marrow Erfe is expected to suppress hepcidin and decrease hepcidin iron responsiveness, resulting in iron overload (Kautz et al., 2014; Kautz et al., 2015). As a consequence, our current findings demonstrate that increased bone marrow erythroblast Erfe expression results in inappropriately low liver Hamp expression relative to parenchymal iron loading (Figure 1C–G), demonstrating decreased Hamp responsiveness to iron in MDS mice. These findings further support the use of these mice as an appropriate MDS model in which decreased hepcidin iron responsiveness is a consequence of expanded erythropoiesis, leading to systemic iron overload observed in this disease (Cui et al., 2014). Furthermore, the reversal of ineffective erythropoiesis in DFP-treated MDS mice, with partial normalization of Erfe expression (Figure 1H), correlates with restored Hamp responsiveness to iron and reversal of parenchymal iron loading in the liver, spleen, and bone marrow (Figure 1C–G). Finally, erythroblast Erfe expression is borderline decreased also in DFP-treated WT mice (Figure 1—figure supplement 6). Taken together, our results provide further evidence that mitigating the hepcidin pathway is relevant in the pathophysiology of ineffective erythropoiesis and its reversal.

Iron chelation with DFP improves ineffective erythropoiesis in MDS mice

DFP-treated MDS mice exhibit increased Hb and RBC count relative to untreated MDS mice and no change in MCV or reticulocytosis (Figure 2A–D); both male and female mice demonstrate approximately equivalent responses to DFP (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). In addition, the WBC count remained low while platelet, neutrophil, lymphocyte, and monocyte counts were unchanged in DFP-treated relative to untreated MDS mice (Figure 2E–I). Furthermore, while the spleen size increased in MDS relative to WT mice and is not significantly decreased after DFP (Figure 3A), splenic architecture is improved (Figure 3B)—with relatively decreased red pulp and more organized splenic nodules—and serum EPO concentration is normalized (Figure 3C) in DFP-treated relative to untreated MDS mice. Consistently, the total number of erythroblasts and the erythroid fraction in the bone marrow are increased in MDS relative to WT mice and normalized in DFP-treated relative to untreated MDS mice, with evident decrease, especially in BasoE and PolyE fractions (Figure 3D–F); both male and female mice demonstrate similar responses to DFP (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). DFP also leads to a normalized bone marrow erythroblast differentiation in MDS mice (Figure 3G) with a proportionally increased PolyE and decreased OrthoE fractions in bone marrow from MDS mice, normalized after DFP treatment, consistent with a block of erythroblast differentiation at PolyE in MDS patients (Ali et al., 2018). Finally, erythroblast apoptosis is unchanged (Figure 3H) despite decreased erythroblast ROS in DFP-treated relative to untreated MDS mice (Figure 3I). These findings are globally consistent with the improvement in ineffective erythropoiesis in response to DFP treatment without effects on erythroblast apoptosis in MDS.

Figure 2. Elevated MCV anemia in MDS mice is partially reversed by DFP.

Circulating RBC count (A), hemoglobin (B), MCV (C), reticulocyte count (D), platelet count (E), WBC count (F), neutrophil count (G), lymphocyte count (H), and monocyte count (i) in WT, MDS, and DFP-treated MDS mice (n=10–14 mice/group) analyzed after 1 month of treatment. *p<0.05 vs. WT; **p<0.01 vs. WT; ***p<0.001 vs. WT; ****p<0.0001 vs. WT; &p<0.05 vs. MDS; &&p<0.01 vs. MDS. Abbreviations: WT = wild type; MDS = myelodysplastic syndrome; DFP = deferiprone; RBC = red blood cell; MCV = mean corpuscular volume; WBC = white blood cell.

Figure 2—source data 1. Source data for circulating cell counts and other parameters in wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. DFP resulted in similar effects on hemoglobin in male and female myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) mice.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

Similarly elevated hemoglobin is observed in male and female DFP-treated MDS mice (n=4–6 male mice/group and n=4–9 female mice/group). *p<0.05 vs. control; Con = control; DFP = deferiprone.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Source data for hemoglobin in male and female myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and DFP-treated MDS mice.

Figure 3. Expanded and ineffective erythropoiesis in MDS mice is partially reversed by DFP.

Spleen weight (n=11–12 mice/group) (A), splenic architecture (n=5 mice/group) (B), serum EPO concentration (n=5–12 mice/group) (C), bone marrow erythroblast count (n=13–15 mice/group) (D), and the total fraction of erythroblasts in the bone marrow (n=13–15 mice/group) (E) are more normal in DFP-treated MDS mice analyzed after 1 month of treatment. The fraction of all stages of terminal erythropoiesis is increased in MDS relative to WT mice in BasoE and PolyE stages and decreased in DFP-treated relative to untreated MDS mice in BasoE stages (n=13–15 mice/group) (F). Erythroblast differentiation in the bone marrow, decreased in MDS relative to WT, is normalized in DFP-treated relative to untreated MDS mice (n=13–15 mice/group) (G). In addition, erythroblast apoptosis, as measured by activated caspase 3/7, is unchanged in DFP-treated MDS mice (n=7–11 mice/group) (H). Finally, erythroblast ROS is decreased in DFP-treated relative to untreated MDS mice (n=11–12 mice/group) (i) analyzed after 1 month of treatment. *p<0.05 vs. WT; **p<0.01 vs. WT; ****p<0.0001 vs. WT; &p<0.05 vs. MDS; &&&p<0.001 vs. MDS; Abbreviations: WT = wild type; MDS = myelodysplastic syndrome; DFP = deferiprone; EPO = erythropoietin; Act casp 3/7 = activated caspase 3 and 7; ROS = reactive oxygen species; ProE = pro-erythroblasts; BasoE = basophilic erythroblasts; PolyE = polychromatophilic erythroblasts; OrthoE = orthochromatophilic erythroblasts; NS = not significant.

Figure 3—source data 1. Source data for erythropoiesis-related parameters in serum, bone marrow, and spleen from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. DFP resulted in similar effects on erythropoiesis in male and female myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) mice.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

Bone marrow erythroblasts are decreased to a similar degree in male and female DFP-treated MDS mice (n=4–7 male mice/group and n=8–9 female mice/group). *p<0.05 vs. control; Con = control; DFP = deferiprone.
Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Source data for bone marrow erythroblasts in male and female myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and DFP-treated MDS mice.
Figure 3—figure supplement 2. DFP has no effect on circulating red blood cell parameters and serum erythropoietin in WT mice.

Figure 3—figure supplement 2.

No differences are observed in RBC count (A), hemoglobin (B), MCV (C), reticulocytes (D), or serum EPO concentration (E) from DFP-treated relative to untreated WT mice (n=5–14 mice/group). WT = wild type; DFP = deferiprone; RBC = red blood cell; MCV = mean corpuscular volume; EPO = erythropoietin.
Figure 3—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Source data for circulating red blood cell parameters and serum erythropoietin from wild type (WT) and DFP-treated WT mice.
Figure 3—figure supplement 3. Effect of DFP on erythropoiesis in WT mice.

Figure 3—figure supplement 3.

Bone marrow erythroblast fraction (n=5–13 mice/group) significantly decreased (A) particularly as a consequence of fewer BasoE, PolyE, and OrthoE (B) in DFP-treated WT mice (n=5–11 mice/group). *p<0.05 vs. WT; WT = wild type; DFP = deferiprone; ProE = pro-erythroblasts; BasoE = basophilic erythroblasts; PolyE = polychromatophilic erythroblasts; OrthoE = orthochromatophilic erythroblasts.
Figure 3—figure supplement 3—source data 1. Source data for total bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT) and DFP-treated WT mice.
Figure 3—figure supplement 3—source data 2. Source data for bone marrow ProE, BasoE, PolyE, and OrthoE erythroblasts from wild type (WT) and DFP-treated WT mice.
Figure 3—figure supplement 4. DFP has no effect on erythroblast apoptosis and reactive oxygen species in WT mice.

Figure 3—figure supplement 4.

Erythroblast apoptosis, as measured by activated caspase 3 and 7 (n=6–9 mice/group) (A), and ROS (B) are unchanged in DFP-treated relative to untreated WT mice (n=5–9 mice/group). WT = wild type; DFP = deferiprone; Act casp 3/7 = activated caspase 3 and 7; ROS = reactive oxygen species.
Figure 3—figure supplement 4—source data 1. Source data for bone marrow erythroblast apoptosis as measured by activated caspase 3/7 and ROS from wild type (WT) and DFP-treated WT mice.
Figure 3—figure supplement 5. Quantification of serum DFP-glucuronide concentration in DFP-treated WT and MDS mice.

Figure 3—figure supplement 5.

Serum concentration of DFP and of its metabolite, DFP-G, is significantly lower in DFP-treated MDS relative to DFP-treated WT mice (n=5 mice/group). *p<0.05 vs. WT DFP; &&p<0.01 vs. WT DFP-G; WT = wild type; MDS = myelodysplastic syndrome; DFP = deferiprone; DFP-G = DFP-glucuronide.
Figure 3—figure supplement 5—source data 1. Source data for serum DFP and G-DFP concentrations from DFP-treated wild type (WT) and MDS mice.
Figure 3—figure supplement 6. Gating strategy for delineating erythroblasts in mouse bone marrow.

Figure 3—figure supplement 6.

Mouse bone marrow is flushed from the femur, processed to remove debris, and filtered to collect CD45 negative flow-through cells. (A) After staining with all required antibodies, CD45-/CD11b-/Gr1- cells are gated (red) and further evaluated using TER119 and side scatter (SSC) to select all TER119 + erythroid lineage cells (red). These cells are then analyzed using forward scatter (FSC) and CD44 to gate pro-erythroblasts (ProE), basophilic erythroblasts (BasoE), polychromatophilic erythroblasts (PolyE), and orthochromatophilic erythroblasts (OrthoE) as progressive stages of terminal erythropoiesis and exclude reticulocytes and enucleated erythrocytes (blue). (B) Terminal erythropoiesis in the bone marrow is evaluated in a homogeneous manner using this gating strategy in WT, MDS, and DFP-treated MDS mice. WT = wild type; MDS = myelodysplastic syndrome; DFP = deferiprone.

Importantly, we evaluate the effects of DFP in WT mice. Specifically, our results demonstrate no change in RBC count, Hb, MCV, reticulocyte count, or serum EPO in DFP-treated relative to untreated WT mice (Figure 3—figure supplement 2). In addition, the bone marrow erythroblast fraction in DFP-treated WT mice is decreased, especially in the late stages of terminal erythropoiesis (i.e. PolyE and OrthoE), similar to DFP-treated MDS mice. However, unlike DFP-treated MDS mice, erythroid differentiation is decreased in DFP-treated relative to untreated WT mice (Figure 3—figure supplement 3). Furthermore, similar to DFP-treated MDS mice, DFP in WT mice results in unchanged erythroblast apoptosis albeit without affecting ROS (Figure 3—figure supplement 4). Taken together, these findings support our conclusions that reversal of ineffective erythropoiesis in MDS mice occurs independently of changes in erythroblast apoptosis, that DFP has a direct effect on erythropoiesis, and that the differences in effect on MDS and WT mice are dependent on the effectiveness of erythropoiesis in the underlying state. Finally, we confirmed that the effect of DFP in WT mice occurs despite a relatively higher serum DFP concentration and metabolized DFP-G concentration in WT relative to MDS mice (Figure 3—figure supplement 5).

Normalized expression of EPO downstream genes in bone marrow erythroblast from DFP-treated MDS mice

To evaluate erythropoiesis more closely, we also measure Gata1 and Bcl11a expression to assess the effect of DFP on other EPO-STAT5 target genes in MDS erythroblasts. Gata1 and Bcl11a expression is known to be downstream of EPO. While GATA1 is an important transcriptional regulator in normal erythropoiesis (Ling and Crispino, 2020), BCL-xl is implicated in the anti-apoptosis effect of EPO on erythroblasts (Koulnis et al., 2012). Aberrant GATA1 expression in MDS has been described with evidence of increased GATA1 expression in bone marrow CD34 + stem and progenitor cells as well as CD71 + erythroblasts from MDS patients (Maratheftis et al., 2007). Furthermore, normal upregulation of GATA1 and BCL-xl during human erythroid differentiation is lost in MDS (Hopfer et al., 2012). Neither Gata1 nor Bcl11a expression has previously been evaluated in MDS mice; their expression is expected to increase in conditions of elevated EPO concentration.

Our results demonstrate that Gata1 mRNA expression is increased in sorted bone marrow ProE, borderline decreased in BasoE, and decreased in PolyE and OrthoE erythroblasts from MDS relative to WT mice (Figure 4A–D), consistent with expectations that GATA1 expression is elevated in MDS patient bone marrow stem and progenitor and early erythroblasts (Maratheftis et al., 2007) with loss of upregulation during erythroblast differentiation (Hopfer et al., 2012). DFP treatment restores Gata1 mRNA expression relative to untreated MDS or WT mice (Figure 4A–D). Furthermore, Bcl11a mRNA expression is decreased in bone marrow erythroblasts from MDS relative to WT mice and returns to normal expression levels in DFP-treated MDS mice (Figure 4F and G) despite increased serum EPO (Figure 3C) and borderline increased erythroblast apoptosis (Figure 3H) in MDS erythroblasts, normalized in DFP-treated relative to untreated MDS mice. Bone marrow erythroblast Bcl11a expression is also increased in DFP-treated WT mice (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). These results raise an important question, namely whether physiological or pathophysiological nuances in EPO-STAT5 signaling can conceptually separate EPO responsiveness from EPO-mediated anti-apoptotic effects in erythroblasts, similar to a hypothesis alluded to in prior publication (Fontenay-Roupie et al., 1999).

Figure 4. DFP leads to normalized gene expression downstream of EPO in MDS erythroblasts.

Gata1 mRNA expression is increased in sorted bone marrow ProE (A), unchanged in BasoE (B), and significantly decreased in PolyE (C) erythroblasts from MDS relative to WT mice; DFP treatment restores Gata1 mRNA expression relative to untreated MDS or WT mice in all including OrthoE (D) erythroblasts (n=15–21 mice/group). DFP treatment in MDS mice does not affect Bcl11a mRNA expression in sorted bone marrow ProE (E), BasoE (F), and PolyE (G), and increases it in OrthoE (H) erythroblasts relative to untreated MDS or WT mice (n=10–12 mice/group). *p<0.05 vs. WT; &p<0.05 vs. MDS; Abbreviations: WT = wild type; MDS = myelodysplastic syndrome; DFP = deferiprone; Gata1 = erythroid transcription factor; Bcl11a B cell lymphoma 11 a; ProE = pro-erythroblasts; BasoE = basophilic erythroblasts; PolyE = polychromatophilic erythroblasts; OrthoE = orthochromatophilic erythroblasts; NS = not significant.

Figure 4—source data 1. Source data for gene expression downstream of erythropoietin (EPO) in sorted bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Effect of DFP on erythroblast Bcl11a expression in WT mice.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

Sorted bone marrow erythroblast Bcl11a mRNA expression between WT and DFP-treated WT mice (n=5–12 mice/group). *p<0.05 vs. WT DFP; WT = wild type; DFP = deferiprone; Bcl11a = B cell lymphoma 11 a, gene name for Bcl-XL.
Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Source data for B cell lymphoma (Bcl11a) in sorted bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT) and DFP-treated WT mice.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2. Nuances of signaling downstream of erythropoietin (EPO) in bone marrow erythroblasts from MDS and DFP-treated MDS mice.

Figure 4—figure supplement 2.

(A) Western blot of bone marrow CD45 negative cell protein extracts demonstrate no differences in STAT5 signaling between untreated and DFP-treated MDS mice, quantified in (B). Similarly, AKT signaling is not altered in DFP-treated MDS mice, quantified in (C), demonstrating no change in these signaling pathways in response to DFP in MDS mice (n=3 mice/group). MDS = myelodysplastic syndrome; DFP = deferiprone; pSTAT5=phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 5; pAKT = phosphorylated protein kinase B.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Western blots with pSTAT5, STAT5, pAKT, and AKT antibody staining relative to actin in bone marrow erythroblast-enriched CD45 negative cells from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and DFP-treated MDS mice.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2—source data 2. Source data for quantification of signaling via STAT5 and AKT in bone marrow erythroblast-enriched CD45 negative cells from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and DFP-treated MDS mice.

We then evaluate signaling pathways downstream of EPO. Both STAT5 and AKT signaling are essential for erythropoiesis. Prior work demonstrates that the expected STAT5 signaling response to EPO is hampered by iron restriction (Khalil et al., 2018). Others demonstrate that AKT signaling is implicated in EPO-mediated erythroblast survival (Ghaffari et al., 2006), essential in conditions with elevated EPO when Epor expression is suppressed (Bullock et al., 2010; Nai et al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2016a). We demonstrate STAT5 and AKT phosphorylation in bone marrow erythroblasts does not change in DFP-treated relative to untreated MDS mice (Figure 4—figure supplement 2). These findings suggest that the expected changes in signaling downstream of EPO are unaffected by DFP administration, implicating possible changes in erythroblast Epor expression in DFP-treated MDS mice.

DFP increases Epor expression in later stage MDS erythroblasts

Next, we explore erythroblast Epor expression in DFP-treated and untreated MDS mice. We hypothesize that Epor plays an important role in EPO responsiveness that is independent of EPO concentration. This hypothesis is based on findings in EpoR-H mice, a knock-in mutation leading to normal EPO-EpoR binding and signaling but absent EpoR internalization and degradation (Menon et al., 2006; Becker et al., 2010; Sulahian et al., 2009). These mice exhibit decreased serum EPO levels, elevated RBC counts, and a smaller proportion of mature erythroid precursors in the bone marrow relative to WT mice (Khalil et al., 2018), suggesting that EpoR expression may influence erythroblast differentiation in a manner that is complementary to the anti-apoptotic effect of EPO.

Based on this premise, we anticipate that Epor expression is decreased in bone marrow erythroblast from MDS relative to WT mice, and restored in DFP-treated relative to untreated MDS mice. We used sorted bone marrow to evaluate Epor expression in progressive stages of terminal erythropoiesis. First, Epor expression is borderline increased in ProE and significantly increased in BasoE, earlier stage erythroblasts (Figure 5A and B) and decreased in PolyE and OrthoE, later stage erythroblasts (Figure 5C and D), in MDS relative to WT mice. Second, Epor expression is significantly increased in all-stage erythroblasts in DFP-treated relative to untreated MDS or WT mice (Figure 5A–D). Finally, DFP does not result in increased Epor expression in bone marrow erythroblasts from WT mice (Figure 5—figure supplement 1). Taken together, increased later-stage erythroblast Epor expression is a potential mechanism by which DFP leads to enhanced EPO responsiveness and enhanced erythroid differentiation despite decreased serum EPO concentration, reversing ineffective erythropoiesis exclusively in MDS mice.

Figure 5. DFP increases Epor expression in MDS erythroblasts.

DFP treatment in MDS mice increases Epor mRNA expression in sorted bone marrow following ProE (A), namely in BasoE (B), PolyE (C), and OrthoE (D) erythroblasts relative to untreated MDS or WT mice. *p<0.05 vs. WT; &p<0.05 vs. MDS; &&p<0.01 vs. MDS. Abbreviations: WT = wild type; MDS = myelodysplastic syndrome; DFP = deferiprone; Epor = erythropoietin receptor; ProE = pro-erythroblasts; BasoE = basophilic erythroblasts; PolyE = polychromatophilic erythroblasts; OrthoE = orthochromatophilic erythroblasts.

Figure 5—source data 1. Source data for erythropoietin receptor (Epor) in sorted bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.

Figure 5.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Effect of DFP on erythroblast Epor expression in WT mice.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

Sorted bone marrow erythroblast Epor mRNA expression between WT and DFP-treated WT mice (n=5–10 mice/group). *<0.05 vs. WT DFP; WT = wild type; DFP = deferiprone; Epor = erythropoietin receptor.
Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Source data for erythropoietin receptor (Epor) in sorted bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT) and DFP-treated WT mice.
Figure 5—figure supplement 2. Defective enucleation in MDS erythroblasts is normalized by DFP.

Figure 5—figure supplement 2.

(A) DFP restores erythroblast enucleation (n=5–7 mice/group) in MDS mouse bone marrow, quantified in (B) as the fraction of enucleated relative to the total of nucleated and enucleated erythroblasts, using Hoechst staining in TER119 positive cells. **p<0.01 vs. WT; Abbreviations: WT = wild type; MDS = myelodysplastic syndrome; DFP = deferiprone.
Figure 5—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Source data for flow analysis of enucleation in erythroblasts from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.

Defective enucleation in MDS erythroblasts is normalized by DFP

Because increased EPO is implicated in defective enucleation (Zhao et al., 2016a), we also evaluate erythroblast enucleation in WT, MDS, and DFP-treated MDS mice. Our results demonstrate decreased enucleation in bone marrow erythroblasts from MDS relative to WT mice and return to normal expression levels in DFP-treated MDS mice (Figure 5—figure supplement 2). These findings are consistent with prior work which provides mechanistic evidence of an enucleation defect in MDS (Zhao et al., 2016b). Our findings are also consistent with our previously published evidence demonstrating that manipulating iron metabolism in erythropoiesis leads to reversal of ineffective erythropoiesis is associated with normalization of the erythroblast enucleation defect in β-thalassemic mice, another model of ineffective erythropoiesis (Li et al., 2017).

TFR1 but not TFR2 expression in MDS erythroblasts is normalized by DFP

Decreased iron in the bone marrow of DFP-treated MDS mice prompted us to evaluate whether specific mechanisms involved in iron sensing and trafficking could explain the beneficial effects of DFP on ineffective erythropoiesis in MDS mice. First, we demonstrate increased cell surface TFR1 on bone marrow erythroblasts from MDS relative to WT mice, normalized in DFP-treated MDS mice (Figure 6A). In contrast, cell surface TFR1 on bone marrow erythroblasts from DFP-treated WT mice is increased relative to WT mice (Figure 6—figure supplement 1). Because Tfrc expression in bone marrow is mainly EPO-mediated (Chan et al., 1994), we anticipate that erythroblast Tfrc expression is elevated in MDS as a consequence of high EPO, consequently decreased in DFP-treated relative to untreated MDS mice. We used sorted bone marrow to evaluate Tfrc expression in progressive stages of terminal erythropoiesis. First, Tfrc expression is increased in ProE and BasoE stages in MDS mice and remains elevated in DFP-treated MDS mice (Figure 6B and C). Next, Tfrc expression is normal and decreased in PolyE and OrthoE stages, respectively, in MDS relative to WT mice and increased to normal levels in DFP-treated relative to untreated MDS mice (Figure 6D and E). In contrast, Tfrc expression in bone marrow erythroblasts from DFP-treated WT mice is decreased relative to WT mice (Figure 6—figure supplement 2). These findings demonstrate that Tfrc expression correlates with Epor expression, especially in ProE stage, DFP in MDS erythroblasts leads to improvement in EPO-responsiveness not observed in WT mice, and erythroblast cell surface TFR1 for iron uptake during erythropoiesis is coordinated with EPO-responsiveness.

Figure 6. DFP normalized TFR1 expression in MDS erythroblasts.

(A) Flow cytometry gating using TER119 and CD44 was used to delineate bone marrow erythroblasts. In these gated erythroblasts, we evaluate membrane TFR1 to demonstrate its decrease in response to DFP in MDS mice (n=7–13 mice/group) analyzed after 1 month of treatment. Tfrc mRNA expression is increased in sorted bone marrow ProE (B) from MDS mice and partially normalized in DFP-treated MDS mice. Tfrc mRNA expression is normal in sorted bone marrow BasoE (C) and PolyE (D), decreased in OrthoE (E) from MDS mice, and increased in DFP-treated relative to untreated MDS mice (n=15–18 mice/group). *p<0.05 vs. WT; **p<0.01 vs. WT; &p<0.05 vs. MDS; &&p<0.01 vs. MDS; Abbreviations: WT = wild type; MDS = myelodysplastic syndrome; DFP = deferiprone; TFR1=transferrin receptor 1; ProE = pro-erythroblasts; BasoE = basophilic erythroblasts; PolyE = polychromatophilic erythroblasts; OrthoE = orthochromatophilic erythroblasts.

Figure 6—source data 1. Source data for flow analysis of cell surface TFR1 and Tfrc in sorted bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.

Figure 6.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1. Effect of DFP on erythroblast surface TFR1 expression in WT mice.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1.

Membrane TFR1 on bone marrow erythroblasts from WT and DFP-treated WT mice (n=5–11 mice/group). *p<0.05 vs. WT DFP; WT = wild type; DFP = deferiprone; TFR1 = transferrin receptor 1; MFI = mean fluorescence index.
Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Source data for flow analysis of cell surface transferrin receptor 1 (TFR1) on bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT) and DFP-treated WT mice.
Figure 6—figure supplement 2. Effect of DFP on erythroblast Tfrc expression in erythroblasts from WT mice.

Figure 6—figure supplement 2.

Sorted bone marrow erythroblast Tfrc mRNA expression between WT and DFP-treated WT mice (n=5–7 mice/group). *p<0.05 vs. WT DFP; WT = wild type; DFP = deferiprone; Tfrc = transferrin receptor 1.
Figure 6—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Source data for Tfrc in sorted bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT) and DFP-treated WT mice.

Next, we evaluate levels of TFR2 in light of its role in iron sensing and coordination of EPO-responsiveness with iron supply during erythropoiesis (Ghaffari et al., 2006; Khalil et al., 2017). Furthermore, TFR2 is under investigation as a potential therapeutic target in β-thalassemia, another disease of ineffective erythropoiesis (Artuso et al., 2018). We hypothesize that TFR2, given the proposed interaction with EPOR (Forejtnikovà et al., 2010), plays a central compensatory role in ineffective erythropoiesis. MDS mice exhibit higher erythroblast surface TFR2 expression specifically in ProE relative to WT, unchanged in DFP-treated MDS mice (Figure 7A). In addition, TFR2 expression is also borderline increased in bone marrow ProE erythroblasts, significantly higher in DFP-treated MDS relative to WT mice (Figure 7B); no significant differences are evident in BasoE, PolyE, and OrthoE bone marrow erythroblasts between WT, MDS, and DFP-treated MDS mice (Figure 7—figure supplement 1). When compared with ProE, TFR2 expression in BasoE, PolyE, and OrthoE is significantly suppressed and remains suppressed in DFP-treated MDS mice (Figure 7C). Finally, no obvious differences in TFR2 protein concentration (Figure 7D and E) or Scrib mRNA expression (Figure 7—figure supplement 2) are evident between bone marrow erythroblasts from WT, MDS, and DFP-treated MDS mice. These findings do not identify a DFP-specific modification of TFR2 mRNA, protein, or erythroblast surface localization or its action through changes in Scrib (Khalil et al., 2018). A mechanistic role for TFR2 in ineffective erythropoiesis in MDS remains to be fully elucidated.

Figure 7. DFP does not normalize elevated TFR2 expression in MDS erythroblasts.

(A) Flow cytometry gating using TER119 and CD44 was used to delineate bone marrow erythroblasts. In these gated erythroblasts, we evaluate membrane TFR2 which is unchanged in MDS and DFP-treated MDS mice (n=6–7 mice/group) analyzed after 1 month of treatment. (B) TFR2 mRNA expression is borderline increased in sorted bone marrow ProE from MDS relative to WT mice and remains significantly elevated in DFP-treated MDS relative to WT mice (n=15–18 mice/group). When compared with sorted bone marrow ProE, TFR2 expression in sorted bone marrow BasoE (C), PolyE (D), and OrthoE (E) is significantly suppressed in MDS relative to WT mice and remains suppressed in PolyE and OrthoE from DFP-treated MDS mice (n=15–18 mice/group). (F) Western blot demonstrating TFR2 protein concentration in bone marrow erythroblasts is not different between WT, MDS, and DFP-treated MDS mice, quantified in (G) (n=3 mice/sample). *p<0.05 vs. WT; **p<0.01 vs. WT; Abbreviations: WT = wild type; MDS = myelodysplastic syndrome; DFP = deferiprone; TFR2 = transferrin receptor 2; ProE = pro-erythroblasts; BasoE = basophilic erythroblasts; PolyE = polychromatophilic erythroblasts; OrthoE = orthochromatophilic erythroblasts.

Figure 7—source data 1. Source data for flow analysis of cell surface transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2), TFR2 protein concentration in bone marrow erythroblast-enriched CD45 negative cells, and TFR2, in sorted bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome(MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.
Figure 7—source data 2. Western blots with transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2) antibody staining relative to actin in bone marrow erythroblast enriched CD45 negative cells from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.

Figure 7.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1. Erythroblast TFR2 mRNA expression in WT, MDS, and DFP-treated MDS mice.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1.

No differences are observed in TFR2 mRNA expression in sorted BasoE (A), PolyE (B), and OrthoE (C) relative to ProE in WT, MDS, and DFP-treated MDS mice (n=5–15 mice/group). WT = wild type; MDS = myelodysplastic syndrome; DFP = deferiprone; TFR2 = transferrin receptor 2; ProE = pro-erythroblasts; BasoE = basophilic erythroblasts; PolyE = polychromatophilic erythroblasts; OrthoE = orthochromatophilic erythroblasts.
Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Source data for transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2) in sorted bone marrow BasoE, PolyE, and OrthoE from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.
Figure 7—figure supplement 2. Erythroblast Scrib mRNA expression in WT, MDS, and DFP-treated MDS mice.

Figure 7—figure supplement 2.

No differences in Scrib mRNA expression are observed in sorted bone marrow ProE (A), BasoE (B), PolyE (C), and OrthoE (D) between WT, MDS, and DFP-treated MDS mice (n=15–18 mice/group). WT = wild type; MDS = myelodysplastic syndrome; DFP = deferiprone; ProE = pro-erythroblasts; BasoE = basophilic erythroblasts; PolyE = polychromatophilic erythroblasts; OrthoE = orthochromatophilic erythroblasts; Scrib = Scribble.
Figure 7—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Source data for Scribble (Scrib) in sorted bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.

Altered iron trafficking in MDS erythroblasts is partially restored by DFP

We explored further the expression of other iron chaperones in MDS mouse bone marrow erythroblasts, hypothesizing that improved erythropoiesis in DFP-treated MDS mice is a consequence of not only decreased iron concentration but altered iron trafficking within erythroblasts. The cytosolic chaperone Poly(rC)-binding protein 1 (PCBP1) delivers iron to ferritin (Leidgens et al., 2013; Ryu et al., 2017) with evidence from Pcbp1 knockout mice, with microcytosis and anemia, that iron delivery to ferritin is required for normal erythropoiesis (Ryu et al., 2017). In addition, PCBP2 is also required for ferritin complex formation (Leidgens et al., 2013). Conversely, an autophagic process to extract iron from the ferritin core is mediated by nuclear receptor coactivator 4 (NCOA4), a selective cargo receptor for autophagic ferritin turn-over, critical for regulation of intracellular iron availability (Mancias et al., 2014; Dowdle et al., 2014). In iron-replete states, PCBP1 and PCBP2 expression is enhanced while NCOA4 is targeted to the proteasome for degradation (Mancias et al., 2015; Philpott, 2018). Our results demonstrate that mRNA expression of both Pcbp1 (Figure 8A–C) and Pcbp2 (Figure 8—figure supplement 1) in sorted bone marrow ProE, BasoE, and PolyE is elevated in MDS mice and does not return to control WT levels in DFP-treated MDS mice. Conversely, mRNA expression of both Pcbp1 (Figure 8D) and Pcbp2 (Figure 8—figure supplement 1) in sorted bone marrow OrthoE is decreased in MDS relative to WT mice, normalized in DFP-treated MDS mice.

Figure 8. DFP alters the expression of iron chaperones in MDS erythroblasts.

Sorted bone marrow Pcbp1 mRNA expression is increased in ProE (A) from MDS relative to WT mice and remains high or is further elevated in ProE, BasoE (B), and PolyE (C) DFP-treated relative to untreated MDS mice. (D) Sorted bone marrow Pcbp1 mRNA expression is unchanged in OrthoE from MDS relative to WT mice, borderline normalized in DFP-treated MDS mice. Sorted bone marrow mRNA expression of Ncoa4 in ProE (E) is borderline increased in MDS, normalized in DFP-treated MDS mice. Sorted bone marrow mRNA expression of Ncoa4 is unchanged in BasoE (F) and PolyE (G) from MDS or DFP-treated MDS relative to WT mice. Sorted bone marrow mRNA expression of Ncoa4 in OrthoE (H) is unchanged in MDS and normalized in DFP-treated MDS mice (n=15–18 mice/group). *p<0.05 vs. WT; &p<0.05 vs. MDS; Abbreviations: WT = wild type; MDS = myelodysplastic syndrome; DFP = deferiprone; Pcbp1=Poly(rC)-binding protein 1; Ncoa4=nuclear receptor coactivator 4; ProE = pro-erythroblasts; BasoE = basophilic erythroblasts; PolyE = polychromatophilic erythroblasts; OrthoE = orthochromatophilic erythroblasts.

Figure 8—source data 1. Source data for Pcbp1 and Ncoa4 in sorted bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.

Figure 8.

Figure 8—figure supplement 1. Erythroblast Pcbp2 mRNA expression in WT, MDS, and DFP-treated MDS mice.

Figure 8—figure supplement 1.

Pcbp2 mRNA expression changes parallel those of Pcbp1 in sorted bone marrow ProE (A), BasoE (B), PolyE (C), and OrthoE (d) between WT, MDS, and DFP-treated MDS mice (n=15–18 mice / group). *p<0.05 vs. WT; &p<0.05 vs. MDS; WT = wild type; MDS = myelodysplastic syndrome; DFP = deferiprone; ProE = pro-erythroblasts; BasoE = basophilic erythroblasts; PolyE = polychromatophilic erythroblasts; OrthoE = orthochromatophilic erythroblasts; Pcbp2=Poly(rC)-binding protein 2.
Figure 8—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Source data for Pcbp2 in sorted bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.
Figure 8—figure supplement 2. Erythroblast Gpx4 mRNA expression in WT, MDS, and DFP-treated MDS mice.

Figure 8—figure supplement 2.

No differences in Gpx4 mRNA expression are observed in sorted bone marrow ProE (A), BasoE (B), PolyE (C), and OrthoE (D) between WT, MDS, and DFP-treated MDS mice (n=15–18 mice/group). WT = wild type; MDS = myelodysplastic syndrome; DFP = deferiprone; ProE = pro-erythroblasts; BasoE = basophilic erythroblasts; PolyE = polychromatophilic erythroblasts; OrthoE = orthochromatophilic erythroblasts; GPX4 = glutathione peroxidase 4.
Figure 8—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Source data for glutathione peroxidase 4 (Gpx4) in sorted bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.

Furthermore, ProE mRNA expression of Ncoa4 shows an increased trend in MDS mice and does not return to control WT levels in DFP-treated MDS mice (Figure 8E). While no differences in Ncoa4 expression in bone marrow sorted BasoE and PolyE from WT, MDS, and DFP-treated MDS mice (Figure 8F and G), Ncoa4 expression is suppressed in sorted bone marrow OrthoE in MDS mice, normalized in DFP-treated MDS mice (Figure 8H). Because of the role of NCOA4 in ferritinophagy and ferroptosis, we evaluate Gpx4 expression in sorted bone marrow erythroblasts, demonstrating no differences between WT, MDS, and DFP-treated MDS mice (Figure 8—figure supplement 2). These findings are consistent with expectations that high levels of iron flux through ferritin, high rates of ferritin turnover, and high rates of iron transfer to the mitochondria require elevated NCOA4 and PCBP1/2 levels (Mancias et al., 2015) and provide preliminary evidence that movement of iron between sub-cellular compartments is altered in MDS erythroblasts, especially in early stages of terminal erythropoiesis, partially normalized by DFP.

Increased expression of iron metabolism-related genes in MDS patient bone marrow stem and progenitor cells

Expression of iron metabolism-related genes is compared in bone marrow-derived CD34 + stem and progenitor cells from MDS patients (N=183) and healthy controls (N=17) as previously described (Pellagatti et al., 2010). As expected, Tfrc, Epor, Gata1, Bcl2l1 (gene name for Bcl-Xl), and Erfe expression are significantly increased in MDS patients relative to controls (Figure 9A–E). In addition, while Pcbp1 is unchanged and Pcbp2 is borderline increased, Ncoa4 is significantly increased in bone marrow stem and progenitor cells from MDS patients (Figure 9F–H), enabling increased ferritin degradation in MDS erythroblasts. Finally, TFR2 expression is also significantly increased in MDS patients relative to controls (Figure 9I), confirming our results in MDS mice. Whether changes in iron sensing and trafficking within erythroblasts contribute to MDS pathophysiology and ineffective erythropoiesis more broadly is unexplored. Our findings demonstrate that NHD13 mice recapitulate pathophysiological changes in iron sensing and trafficking in erythroid progenitors from MDS patients.

Figure 9. Increased expression of iron metabolism-related genes in MDS patient bone marrow stem and progenitor cells.

Figure 9.

Increased expression of Tfrc (A), Epor (B), Gata1 (C), Bcl2l1 (D), and Erfe (E) is expected and validates the database. No difference in Pcbp1 (F), borderline increase in Pcbp2 (G), and statistically significantly increase in Ncoa4 (H) and TFR2 (I) are evident in MDS patients relative to controls, providing an important confirmation of the relevance of similar findings in MDS mice. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.0001 vs. control; MDS = myelodysplastic syndrome; Tfrc and TFR2 = transferrin receptor 1 and 2; Epor = erythropoietin receptor; Bcl2l1 = B cell lymphoma 2-like protein 1 (gene name for Bcl-Xl); Erfe = erythroferrone; Pcbp1 and Pcbp2 = Poly(rC)-binding protein 1 and 2; Ncoa4 nuclear receptor coactivator 4.

Figure 9—source data 1. Source data for iron metabolism-related genes in bone marrow stem and progenitor cells from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients vs. controls.

Discussion

We show that MDS mice exhibit aberrant erythroblast iron trafficking and that iron chelation with DFP abrogates these changes to restore EPO-responsiveness. The effectiveness of DFP has previously been demonstrated in MDS patients (Kersten et al., 1996). These data raise the possibility that specifically targeting the iron sensing or iron trafficking machinery in erythroblasts may enable the amelioration of ineffective erythropoiesis in addition to iron overload in MDS patients.

RBCs, the highest concentration among all cell types in circulation, are a product of erythroid precursor differentiation and enucleation, requiring 80% of the circulating iron for Hb synthesis (Muckenthaler et al., 2017). Furthermore, how iron regulates erythropoiesis is incompletely understood and next to nothing is known about whether and how dysregulated iron metabolism contributes to the pathophysiology of ineffective erythropoiesis in MDS. The well-known, timely, abundant, and coordinated delivery of sufficient iron to erythroid precursors is accomplished via TFR1 to enable Hb production. TFR1 is both regulated by iron and enhanced by EPO-mediated signaling, evidence of the iron dependency in erythropoiesis. Furthermore, prior studies demonstrate that iron delivery to ferritin is absolutely required for normal erythropoiesis (Ryu et al., 2017) and cytosolic chaperones PCBP1 and PCBP2 were recently identified as central to ferritin iron delivery in erythroblasts (Leidgens et al., 2013; Ryu et al., 2017). In addition, the process of ferritinophagy has recently been described, as an autophagic process to extract iron from the ferritin core. NCOA4 is a selective cargo receptor for autophagic ferritin turn-over, critical for regulating intracellular iron availability for cellular function (Mancias et al., 2014; Dowdle et al., 2014; Mancias et al., 2015; Philpott, 2018). Finally, TFR2 expression has recently been identified in erythroid precursors (Nai et al., 2015; Khalil et al., 2017; Artuso et al., 2018; Forejtnikovà et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2012; Rishi et al., 2016). TFR2 is functionally involved in erythroid differentiation (Forejtnikovà et al., 2010) via an interaction with EPOR (Khalil et al., 2017) to modulate EPO responsiveness and possibly in shuttling iron to the mitochondria, but conflicting data findings underscore our incomplete understanding of the down-stream effect of TFR2 in erythropoiesis. Taken together, the movement of iron within erythroblasts is a complex multi-step process to handle a redox-active compound that is also required for the central task of erythropoiesis, i.e., Hb synthesis.

Our results demonstrate that iron trafficking is abnormal in MDS erythroblasts and restored in response to DFP (Figure 10). Specifically, increased TFR1 in MDS erythroblasts is expected to deliver more iron to erythroblast ferritin stores via increased PCBPs; more NCOA4 is expected to extract more iron from ferritin and more TFR2 to deliver more iron to mitochondria for Hb synthesis. Increased iron uptake by erythroblasts leads to a relatively normal amount of iron in the circulation despite systemic and parenchymal iron overload in MDS mice. Interestingly, erythroblast ferritin does not increase in MDS relative to WT mice; we speculate that this results from increased NCOA4-mediated iron release from ferritin and leads to an increase in iron’s redox activity and higher erythroblast ROS. Our findings suggest that, although regulation of late-stage erythropoiesis remains incompletely understood, redox-active iron accumulation may lead to a feedback downregulation in iron trafficking genes during erythroblast differentiation, consequently resulting in ineffective erythropoiesis.

Figure 10. Putative function of erythroblast iron trafficking in health and in MDS before and after DFP treatment.

Figure 10.

Erythroblast iron uptake is mediated by TFR1 via endocytosis of clathrin-coated pits. In addition, erythroblast ferritin iron delivery is an obligatory step in erythropoiesis, and chaperones, i.e., PCBP1 and PCBP2, deliver iron to ferritin while NCOA4 enable iron extraction from ferritin, leading to iron utilization for hemoglobin synthesis in the mitochondria (A). In conditions of expanded erythropoiesis, such as MDS (B), more TFR1 results in increased iron uptake, resulting in decreased PCBP1 and NCOA4; yet no change in ferritin storage. Treatment with DFP restores erythroblast iron trafficking with decreased TFR1, increased PCBP1 and NCOA4, and increased ferritin concentration (C). We propose a model in which altered iron delivery to the mitochondria correlates with increased erythroblast survival and proliferation and decreased erythroid differentiation, causing ineffective erythropoiesis in MDS, ameliorated in response to DFP. Abbreviations: WT = wild type; MDS = myelodysplastic syndrome; DFP = deferiprone; TF = transferrin; TFR1 = transferrin receptor 1; PCBP1/2=Poly(rC)-binding protein 1 and 2; NCOA4=nuclear receptor coactivator 4; Hb = hemoglobin.

Differences in early and later stage erythroblast can also be seen when comparing iron trafficking genes in MDS mice with that in stem and progenitor cells from MDS patients. Patient samples correlate with early-stage erythroblasts in MDS mice in which Tfrc, Epor, TFR2, and NCOA4 expression is increased, providing validation that altered iron trafficking is a relevant pathophysiological component in MDS patients. In further support, AML patients for example exhibit increased bone marrow TFR2 expression (Veneri et al., 2005; Kollia et al., 2003), and expression in blasts correlates with serum ferritin and overall prognosis (Nakamaki et al., 2004). Based on these findings, we propose that targeting iron trafficking in erythroblasts may be a viable therapeutic strategy in iron-loading anemias, increasing erythroblast ferritin iron sequestration to protect later-stage erythropoiesis from redox-active effects of more labile forms of iron. For example, while NCOA4 is fundamental for iron supply during erythropoiesis, when iron is abundant, such as in MDS, other compensatory mechanisms are activated to prevent anemia (Nai et al., 2021), providing a rationale for targeting NCOA4 suppression to reverse ineffective erythropoiesis.

Lastly, although clearly, increased ROS levels result in cellular damage, emerging evidence suggests that ROS is required for normal hematopoiesis, influencing stem cell migration, differentiation, cell cycle status, and self-renewal (Ludin et al., 2014) such that hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal potential is associated with low ROS states while high ROS states are associated with differentiating hematopoietic stem cells. Further increased ROS leads to senescence and decreased ROS restores differentiation in those conditions (Ludin et al., 2014). In addition, ROS can activate JAK/STAT pathways (Tibaldi et al., 2020) and, therefore, EPO-EPOR mediated cell growth and survival. Recent evidence indicates that EPO and iron are required for ROS generation in erythroblasts, and that ROS are necessary for terminal erythropoiesis [44] while unchecked ROS accumulation results in anemia (Friedman et al., 2001; Hebbel, 1990; Kong et al., 2004; Lee et al., 2004; Neumann et al., 2003). Taken together, ROS generation is both critical and potentially toxic, requiring significant coordination during erythropoiesis with particular importance for mitigating increased ROS in conditions of ineffective erythropoiesis as in MDS. However, whether increased ROS resulting in apoptosis as the cause of ineffective erythropoiesis has never been definitely confirmed. We and others previously demonstrated that EPO downstream mechanisms are potent anti-apoptotic compensatory mechanisms and that reversal of apoptosis does not ameliorate ineffective erythropoiesis in β-thalassemia (Feola et al., 2021; Menon et al., 2022). Our current results demonstrate borderline increased erythroblast apoptosis while ROS is significantly enhanced in MDS mice and no change in apoptosis while ROS is significantly decreased in DFP-treated MDS mice. These results uncouple apoptosis from ROS as the underlying cause of ineffective erythropoiesis.

In conclusion, despite FDA approval of iron chelators for use in iron-overloaded MDS patients, they remain underutilized due to a lack of biological insights into the deleterious effects of iron overload on disease pathophysiology in MDS. Our results demonstrate that DFP partially ameliorates ineffective erythropoiesis in MDS mice not only by reducing systemic iron overload, but also by altering iron trafficking within erythroblast and the sensitivity of erythroblasts to EPO, enhancing erythroblast differentiation. We further identify similar alterations in iron trafficking genes also in MDS patient bone marrow samples, validating our findings in MDS mice and anticipating a potential for translating these results. An important caveat to consider is whether a mouse model of transfusion-independent MDS such as NHD13 mice applies also to transfusion-dependent patients. The main focus of the current work is to evaluate the effect of DFP on ineffective erythropoiesis. As a consequence, using transfused NHD13 mice is impossible as transfusion itself suppresses the very ineffective erythropoiesis we aim to study.

In addition, with an eye toward its translation, the use of DFP has been associated with the occurrence of severe neutropenia/agranulocytosis defined as an absolute neutrophil count below 0.5 × 109 cells/L. A recent report from the US safety registry of DFP indicates a potentially higher incidence of agranulocytosis in 115 patients with MDS, all resolved with dose interruption (Zeidan et al., 2022). The report concludes that the safety profile of DFP in MDS is potentially consistent with that of other iron-loading anemias with no new safety concerns or unexpected adverse events. However, it remains to be determined whether agranulocytosis occurs at a higher frequency than with other iron chelating agents in MDS, is a specific consequence unique to the patients’ primary disease, or resulted from the relatively small sample size in this registry. Thus, although additional evidence is needed to ascertain the mechanism(s) and clinical relevance of DFP-induced agranulocytosis in MDS patients in anticipation of its translation, no change in white blood cell count was observed in mice and potential benefits may ultimately be found to outweigh the risks. Taken together, the main purpose of the current study is to provide a rationale for targeting erythroblast-specific iron sensing and trafficking to ameliorate ineffective erythropoiesis in MDS either with already available (e.g. DFP) or novel therapies currently in development for diseases of ineffective erythropoiesis.

Materials and methods

Mice and treatment

C57BL/6 (WT) and C57BL/6-Tg(Vav1-NUP98/HOXD13)G2Apla/J (NHD13) mice (Lin et al., 2005) were originally purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). For simplicity, NHD13 mice are designated as ‘MDS mice’ throughout the manuscript. All mice were bred and housed in the animal facility under the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care guidelines. Experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. This well-established mouse model has been shown to recapitulate all key findings in human MDS, including blood cell dysplasia, peripheral blood cytopenias, ineffective hematopoiesis prior to transformation to acute leukemia, and a subset of mice progressing to acute leukemia at 14 months (Lin et al., 2005; Slape et al., 2008). NHD13 mice on a C57BL/6 background were previously found to be clinically appropriate as an MDS model until at least 7 months (Lin et al., 2005; Slape et al., 2008). As a consequence, we used age and gender-matched 5-month-old mice, at least five mice per group, treated with deferiprone (DFP; trade name Ferriprox; chemical name 3-hydroxy-1,2-dimethylpyridin-4-one) at a concentration of 1.25 mg/mL in the drinking water for 4 weeks. DFP is an orally active iron chelator that binds iron in a 3:1 (DFP:iron) complex and undergoes renal clearance. Mice were euthanized for analysis at 6 months of age, as mice were analyzed previously to study the effects of ineffective erythropoiesis (Suragani et al., 2014). Therefore, all endpoints of interest were analyzed to compare DFP-treated MDS mice after 1 month of treatment with untreated MDS mice and WT controls.

Peripheral blood analyses

Mice peripheral blood cell counting was analyzed by ProCyte Dx Hematology Analyzer. Serum mouse EPO (Quantikine, R&D Systems) was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Integra 800 Automated Clinical Analyzer (Roche Diagnostics) was used to measure serum iron to transferrin iron-binding capacity (TIBC); serum transferrin saturation was measured as a ratio of serum iron to TIBC. Serum DFP and its metabolite DFP-glucuronide (DFP-G) concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, validated in accordance with the FDA Bioanalytical Method Validation Guidance. The lower limit of quantifiable values for the method was 0.10 µM for DFP and 0.050 µM for DFP-Glu in mouse serum.

Histology and immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemical staining was performed using anti-TER119 antibodies (eBioscience, San Diego, CA), and counterstained with hematoxylin. Images were acquired on a Zeiss Axioskop2 microscope with an AxioCamHRC camera using Plan-Neofluar objectives 20x/0.5 and Axiovision software.

Non-heme iron spectrophotometry

Quantification was performed via the Torrance and Bothwell method (Torrance and Bothwell, 1980). Briefly, specimens were digested overnight in an acid solution at 65 °C. A mixture of chromogen solution with acid extraction was incubated at room temperature for 10 min and the absorbance was measured at 540 nm by spectrophotometer (CLARIOstar plate reader, BMG Labtech).

Quantitative real-time PCR

We prepared RNA from sorted bone marrow and liver samples using the RNeasy Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. We synthesized cDNA using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher). Primers are listed in Supplementary file 1a. qPCR was conducted by iQ SYBRGreen Supermix using the BioRad CFX96 Real-Time PCR Thermal Cycler. Target gene mRNA concentration was normalized to Gapdh.

Western immunoblotting

Beads sorted CD45 negative bone marrow or liver cells were lysed in ice-cold SDS page lysis buffer (2% SDS, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 10 mM EDTA) with protease and phosphatase inhibitors. Twenty mg of heat–denatured protein was loaded onto a 10% gel, run, and transferred onto a 0.4 mm nitrocellulose membrane (Thermo Scientific). After blocking with 5% BSA in Tris–buffered saline with 1% Tween-20, the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies to signaling proteins (Supplementary file 1b) overnight at 4 °C, washed, and incubated with the corresponding HRP–conjugated secondary antibodies at room temperature. Proteins were visualized using the ImageQuant LAS 4010 and quantified using Image J.

Flow cytometric analysis and sorting

Bone marrow cells were processed as described previously (Liu et al., 2013) with minor modifications. Briefly, the cells were mechanically dissociated, blocked with rat anti–mouse CD16/CD32 (Fcγ III/II Receptor), incubated with anti-CD45 magnetic beads (Mylteni), and underwent magnetic separation using LS columns according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Miltenyi Biotec). Erythroid lineage-enriched CD45 negative cells were collected for further staining. Non-erythroid and necrotic cells were excluded using anti-CD45 (BD Pharmigen), anti-CD11b, and anti-Gr1 (APC-Cy7) (Tonbo, Biosciences) antibodies. Cells were incubated with anti-mouse TER119 PE-Cy7 (BioLegend) and CD44-APC (Tonbo, Biosciences) to identify and delineate progressive stages of erythroblast differentiation (Figure 3—figure supplement 6). Once erythroblasts were delineated by TER119, CD44, and forward scatter, CD71-PE (BioLegend) was used to evaluate changes in erythroblast membrane TFR1. ROS quantification in erythroblasts was performed using immunostaining for ROS (Invitrogen) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. To evaluate apoptosis, cells were stained for activated caspase 3/7 kit (Invitrogen); 7-amino-actinomycin D (7AAD, BD Pharmingen) was added to exclude dead cells. Cells were analyzed within 1 hr of staining using BD FACSDiva Version 6.1.2 software on a FACSCanto flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson). The gating strategy was as previously described (Liu et al., 2013). Erythroid differentiation was quantified by analyzing the fraction of each stage of terminal erythropoiesis relative to all erythroblasts in each bone marrow sample. In addition, to individually evaluate gene expression in erythroblasts at different maturation stages, bone marrow cells underwent sorting on a BD FACSAria III (BD Biosciences). Finally, enucleation was assessed as described previously (An and Chen, 2018).

Gene expression in MDS patient database

Gene expression data from 183 MDS CD34 + samples and 17 controls were obtained from GEO (GSE19429) as previously described (Pellagatti et al., 2010).

Statistical analyses

All data are reported as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). We performed analysis for statistically significant differences using one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons and Tukey post-test analyses for the mouse samples where more than two groups are compared and two-tailed t-test in all other circumstances.

Acknowledgements

We sincerely appreciate the perpetual energy and devotion of the late Professor Eliezer Rachmilewitz to the importance of understanding and treating iron overload in MDS and dedicate this manuscript to his memory. We are grateful for funding from CSL Behring (King of Prussia, PA) (to Y.Z.G.) and the Italian Government Fellowship (to M.F.) for support of early work that served as the foundation of this study and ApoPharma (Chiesi) for supporting the experiments presented here.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Yelena Ginzburg, Email: yelena.ginzburg@mssm.edu.

Yongliang Yang, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China.

Caigang Liu, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grant:

  • Chiesi USA ApoPharma Grant to Yelena Ginzburg.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

Reviewing editor, eLife.

Author contributions

Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing.

Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing.

Resources, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing.

Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing.

Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review and editing.

Resources, Data curation, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing - original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Ethics

This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#16-0143) of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. All surgery was performed under isoflurane anesthesia, and every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Additional files

Supplementary file 1. Tables of reagents used for PCR and western blot experiments.

(a) Table of primers. (b) Table of antibodies.

elife-83103-supp1.docx (21.8KB, docx)

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file. Source data files have been provided for Figures 1–9.

The following previously published dataset was used:

Pellagatti A, Boultwood J, Wainscoat JS. 2010. Expression data from bone marrow CD34+ cells of MDS patients and healthy controls. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE19429

References

  1. Ali AM, Huang Y, Pinheiro RF, Xue F, Hu J, Iverson N, Hoehn D, Coutinho D, Kayani J, Chernak B, Lane J, Hillyer C, Galili N, Jurcic J, Mohandas N, An X, Raza A. Severely impaired terminal erythroid differentiation as an independent prognostic marker in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood Advances. 2018;2:1393–1402. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018018440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. An X, Chen L. Flow cytometric analysis of erythroblast enucleation. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2018;1698:193–203. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7428-3_11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Angelucci E, Li J, Greenberg P, Wu D, Hou M, Montano Figueroa EH, Rodriguez MG, Dong X, Ghosh J, Izquierdo M, Garcia-Manero G, on behalf of the TELESTO Study Investigators Iron chelation in transfusion-dependent patients with low- to intermediate-1–risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2020;172:513. doi: 10.7326/M19-0916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, Thiele J, Borowitz MJ, Le Beau MM, Bloomfield CD, Cazzola M, Vardiman JW. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127:2391–2405. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Artuso I, Lidonnici MR, Altamura S, Mandelli G, Pettinato M, Muckenthaler MU, Silvestri L, Ferrari G, Camaschella C, Nai A. Transferrin receptor 2 is a potential novel therapeutic target for β-thalassemia: evidence from a murine model. Blood. 2018;132:2286–2297. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-05-852277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Badawi MA, Vickars LM, Chase JM, Leitch HA. Red blood cell transfusion independence following the initiation of iron chelation therapy in myelodysplastic syndrome. Advances in Hematology. 2010;2010:164045. doi: 10.1155/2010/164045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Becker V, Schilling M, Bachmann J, Baumann U, Raue A, Maiwald T, Timmer J, Klingmüller U. Covering a broad dynamic range: information processing at the erythropoietin receptor. Science. 2010;328:1404–1408. doi: 10.1126/science.1184913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bullock GC, Delehanty LL, Talbot AL, Gonias SL, Tong WH, Rouault TA, Dewar B, Macdonald JM, Chruma JJ, Goldfarb AN. Iron control of erythroid development by a novel aconitase-associated regulatory pathway. Blood. 2010;116:97–108. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-10-251496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Camaschella C, Campanella A, De Falco L, Boschetto L, Merlini R, Silvestri L, Levi S, Iolascon A. The human counterpart of zebrafish shiraz shows sideroblastic-like microcytic anemia and iron overload. Blood. 2007;110:1353–1358. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-02-072520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Casu C, Aghajan M, Oikonomidou PR, Guo S, Monia BP, Rivella S. Combination of Tmprss6- ASO and the iron chelator deferiprone improves erythropoiesis and reduces iron overload in a mouse model of beta-thalassemia intermedia. Haematologica. 2016;101:e8–e11. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2015.133348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chan RY, Seiser C, Schulman HM, Kühn LC, Ponka P. Regulation of transferrin receptor mRNA expression. Distinct regulatory features in erythroid cells. European Journal of Biochemistry. 1994;220:683–692. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb18669.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cui R, Gale RP, Zhu G, Xu Z, Qin T, Zhang Y, Huang G, Li B, Fang L, Zhang H, Pan L, Hu N, Qu S, Xiao Z. Serum iron metabolism and erythropoiesis in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome not receiving RBC transfusions. Leukemia Research. 2014;38:545–550. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2014.01.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dayyani F, Conley AP, Strom SS, Stevenson W, Cortes JE, Borthakur G, Faderl S, O’Brien S, Pierce S, Kantarjian H, Garcia-Manero G. Cause of death in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Cancer. 2010;116:2174–2179. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dowdle WE, Nyfeler B, Nagel J, Elling RA, Liu S, Triantafellow E, Menon S, Wang Z, Honda A, Pardee G, Cantwell J, Luu C, Cornella-Taracido I, Harrington E, Fekkes P, Lei H, Fang Q, Digan ME, Burdick D, Powers AF, Helliwell SB, D’Aquin S, Bastien J, Wang H, Wiederschain D, Kuerth J, Bergman P, Schwalb D, Thomas J, Ugwonali S, Harbinski F, Tallarico J, Wilson CJ, Myer VE, Porter JA, Bussiere DE, Finan PM, Labow MA, Mao X, Hamann LG, Manning BD, Valdez RA, Nicholson T, Schirle M, Knapp MS, Keaney EP, Murphy LO. Selective VPS34 inhibitor blocks autophagy and uncovers a role for NCOA4 in ferritin degradation and iron homeostasis in vivo. Nature Cell Biology. 2014;16:1069–1079. doi: 10.1038/ncb3053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Feola M, Zamperone A, Moskop D, Chen H, Casu C, Lama D, Di Martino J, Djedaini M, Papa L, Martinez MR, Choesang T, Bravo-Cordero JJ, MacKay M, Zumbo P, Brinkman N, Abrams CS, Rivella S, Hattangadi S, Mason CE, Hoffman R, Ji P, Follenzi A, Ginzburg YZ. Pleckstrin-2 is essential for erythropoiesis in β-thalassemic mice, reducing apoptosis and enhancing enucleation. Communications Biology. 2021;4:517. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02046-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fibach E, Rachmilewitz EA. Selective toxicity towards myelodysplastic hematopoietic progenitors - another rationale for iron chelation in MDS. Leukemia Research. 2012;36:962–963. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2012.04.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fontenay-Roupie M, Bouscary D, Guesnu M, Picard F, Melle J, Lacombe C, Gisselbrecht S, Mayeux P, Dreyfus F. Ineffective erythropoiesis in myelodysplastic syndromes: correlation with Fas expression but not with lack of erythropoietin receptor signal transduction. British Journal of Haematology. 1999;106:464–473. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01539.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Forejtnikovà H, Vieillevoye M, Zermati Y, Lambert M, Pellegrino RM, Guihard S, Gaudry M, Camaschella C, Lacombe C, Roetto A, Mayeux P, Verdier F. Transferrin receptor 2 is a component of the erythropoietin receptor complex and is required for efficient erythropoiesis. Blood. 2010;116:5357–5367. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-281360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Friedman JS, Rebel VI, Derby R, Bell K, Huang T-T, Kuypers FA, Epstein CJ, Burakoff SJ. Absence of mitochondrial superoxide dismutase results in a murine hemolytic anemia responsive to therapy with a catalytic antioxidant. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2001;193:925–934. doi: 10.1084/jem.193.8.925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Garcia-Manero G, Shan J, Faderl S, Cortes J, Ravandi F, Borthakur G, Wierda WG, Pierce S, Estey E, Liu J, Huang X, Kantarjian H. A prognostic score for patients with lower risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia. 2008;22:538–543. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2405070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ghaffari S, Kitidis C, Zhao W, Marinkovic D, Fleming MD, Luo B, Marszalek J, Lodish HF. AKT induces erythroid-cell maturation of JAK2-deficient fetal liver progenitor cells and is required for Epo regulation of erythroid-cell differentiation. Blood. 2006;107:1888–1891. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-06-2304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ginzburg YZ. Hepcidin-ferroportin axis in health and disease. Vitamins and Hormones. 2019;110:17–45. doi: 10.1016/bs.vh.2019.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Goldberg SL, Chen E, Corral M, Guo A, Mody-Patel N, Pecora AL, Laouri M. Incidence and clinical complications of myelodysplastic syndromes among united states medicare beneficiaries. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2010;28:2847–2852. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.2395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Greenberg PL, Rigsby CK, Stone RM, Deeg HJ, Gore SD, Millenson MM, Nimer SD, O’Donnell MR, Shami PJ, Kumar R. NCCN task force: transfusion and iron overload in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2009;7:S–1. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2009.0082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Greenberg PL, Tuechler H, Schanz J, Sanz G, Garcia-Manero G, Solé F, Bennett JM, Bowen D, Fenaux P, Dreyfus F, Kantarjian H, Kuendgen A, Levis A, Malcovati L, Cazzola M, Cermak J, Fonatsch C, Le Beau MM, Slovak ML, Krieger O, Luebbert M, Maciejewski J, Magalhaes SMM, Miyazaki Y, Pfeilstöcker M, Sekeres M, Sperr WR, Stauder R, Tauro S, Valent P, Vallespi T, van de Loosdrecht AA, Germing U, Haase D. Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2012;120:2454–2465. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-03-420489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Haferlach T. The molecular pathology of myelodysplastic syndrome. Pathobiology. 2019;86:24–29. doi: 10.1159/000488712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hartmann J, Braulke F, Sinzig U, Wulf G, Maas JH, Konietschke F, Haase D. Iron overload impairs proliferation of erythroid progenitors cells (BFU-E) from patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia Research. 2013;37:327–332. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2012.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hebbel RP. The sickle erythrocyte in double jeopardy: autoxidation and iron decompartmentalization. Seminars in Hematology. 1990;27:51–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hellström-Lindberg E. Management of anemia associated with myelodysplastic syndrome. Seminars in Hematology. 2005;42:S10–S13. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2005.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hopfer O, Nolte F, Mossner M, Komor M, Kmetsch A, Benslasfer O, Reissmann M, Nowak D, Hoelzer D, Thiel E, Hofmann W-K. Epigenetic dysregulation of GATA1 is involved in myelodysplastic syndromes dyserythropoiesis. European Journal of Haematology. 2012;88:144–153. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2011.01715.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Janssen JW, Buschle M, Layton M, Drexler HG, Lyons J, van den Berghe H, Heimpel H, Kubanek B, Kleihauer E, Mufti GJ. Clonal analysis of myelodysplastic syndromes: evidence of multipotent stem cell origin. Blood. 1989;73:248–254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kautz L, Jung G, Valore EV, Rivella S, Nemeth E, Ganz T. Identification of erythroferrone as an erythroid regulator of iron metabolism. Nature Genetics. 2014;46:678–684. doi: 10.1038/ng.2996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kautz L, Jung G, Du X, Gabayan V, Chapman J, Nasoff M, Nemeth E, Ganz T. Erythroferrone contributes to hepcidin suppression and iron overload in a mouse model of β-thalassemia. Blood. 2015;126:2031–2037. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-07-658419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kersten MJ, Lange R, Smeets ME, Vreugdenhil G, Roozendaal KJ, Lameijer W, Goudsmit R. Long-term treatment of transfusional iron overload with the oral iron chelator deferiprone (L1): a Dutch multicenter trial. Annals of Hematology. 1996;73:247–252. doi: 10.1007/s002770050236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Khalil S, Holy M, Grado S, Fleming R, Kurita R, Nakamura Y, Goldfarb A. A specialized pathway for erythroid iron delivery through lysosomal trafficking of transferrin receptor 2. Blood Advances. 2017;1:1181–1194. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2016003772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Khalil S, Delehanty L, Grado S, Holy M, White Z, Freeman K, Kurita R, Nakamura Y, Bullock G, Goldfarb A. Iron modulation of erythropoiesis is associated with Scribble-mediated control of the erythropoietin receptor. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 2018;215:661–679. doi: 10.1084/jem.20170396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kollia P, Samara M, Stamatopoulos K, Belessi C, Stavroyianni N, Tsompanakou A, Athanasiadou A, Vamvakopoulos N, Laoutaris N, Anagnostopoulos A, Fassas A. Molecular evidence for transferrin receptor 2 expression in all FAB subtypes of acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia Research. 2003;27:1101–1103. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2126(03)00100-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kong Y, Zhou S, Kihm AJ, Katein AM, Yu X, Gell DA, Mackay JP, Adachi K, Foster-Brown L, Louden CS, Gow AJ, Weiss MJ. Loss of alpha-hemoglobin-stabilizing protein impairs erythropoiesis and exacerbates beta-thalassemia. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2004;114:1457–1466. doi: 10.1172/JCI21982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Koulnis M, Porpiglia E, Porpiglia PA, Liu Y, Hallstrom K, Hidalgo D, Socolovsky M. Contrasting dynamic responses in vivo of the Bcl-xL and Bim erythropoietic survival pathways. Blood. 2012;119:1228–1239. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-07-365346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kröger N. Induction, bridging, or straight ahead: the ongoing dilemma of allografting in advanced myelodysplastic syndrome. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2019;25:e247–e249. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lee JM, Chan K, Kan YW, Johnson JA. Targeted disruption of Nrf2 causes regenerative immune-mediated hemolytic anemia. PNAS. 2004;101:9751–9756. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403620101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lee P, Hsu MH, Welser-Alves J, Peng H. Severe microcytic anemia but increased erythropoiesis in mice lacking Hfe or Tfr2 and Tmprss6. Blood Cells, Molecules & Diseases. 2012;48:173–178. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2011.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Leidgens S, Bullough KZ, Shi H, Li F, Shakoury-Elizeh M, Yabe T, Subramanian P, Hsu E, Natarajan N, Nandal A, Stemmler TL, Philpott CC. Each member of the poly-r(C)-binding protein 1 (PCBP) family exhibits iron chaperone activity toward ferritin. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2013;288:17791–17802. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.460253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Li H, Choesang T, Bao W, Chen H, Feola M, Garcia-Santos D, Li J, Sun S, Follenzi A, Pham P, Liu J, Zhang J, Ponka P, An X, Mohandas N, Fleming RE, Rivella S, Li G, Ginzburg YZ. Decreasing TfR1 expression reverses anemia and hepcidin suppression in β-thalassemic mice. Blood. 2017;129:1514–1526. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-09-742387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lin YW, Slape C, Zhang Z, Aplan PD. NUP98-HOXD13 transgenic mice develop a highly penetrant, severe myelodysplastic syndrome that progresses to acute leukemia. Blood. 2005;106:287–295. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-12-4794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ling T, Crispino JD. GATA1 mutations in red cell disorders. IUBMB Life. 2020;72:106–118. doi: 10.1002/iub.2177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Liu J, Zhang J, Ginzburg Y, Li H, Xue F, De Franceschi L, Chasis JA, Mohandas N, An X. Quantitative analysis of murine terminal erythroid differentiation in vivo: novel method to study normal and disordered erythropoiesis. Blood. 2013;121:e43–e49. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-09-456079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Liu W, Teodorescu P, Halene S, Ghiaur G. The coming of age of preclinical models of MDS. Frontiers in Oncology. 2022;12:815037. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.815037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Ludin A, Gur-Cohen S, Golan K, Kaufmann KB, Itkin T, Medaglia C, Lu X-J, Ledergor G, Kollet O, Lapidot T. Reactive oxygen species regulate hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal, migration and development, as well as their bone marrow microenvironment. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling. 2014;21:1605–1619. doi: 10.1089/ars.2014.5941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Malcovati L, Porta M, Pascutto C, Invernizzi R, Boni M, Travaglino E, Passamonti F, Arcaini L, Maffioli M, Bernasconi P, Lazzarino M, Cazzola M. Prognostic factors and life expectancy in myelodysplastic syndromes classified according to WHO criteria: a basis for clinical decision making. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2005;23:7594–7603. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.7038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Malcovati L, Della Porta MG, Cazzola M. Predicting survival and leukemic evolution in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Haematologica. 2006;91:1588–1590. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Malcovati L, Della Porta MG, Strupp C, Ambaglio I, Kuendgen A, Nachtkamp K, Travaglino E, Invernizzi R, Pascutto C, Lazzarino M, Germing U, Cazzola M. Impact of the degree of anemia on the outcome of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and its integration into the WHO classification-based Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS) Haematologica. 2011;96:1433–1440. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.044602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Mancias JD, Wang X, Gygi SP, Harper JW, Kimmelman AC. Quantitative proteomics identifies NCOA4 as the cargo receptor mediating ferritinophagy. Nature. 2014;509:105–109. doi: 10.1038/nature13148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Mancias J, Pontano Vaites L, Nissim S, Biancur DE, Kim AJ, Wang X, Liu Y, Goessling W, Kimmelman AC, Harper JW. Ferritinophagy via NCOA4 is required for erythropoiesis and is regulated by iron dependent HERC2-mediated proteolysis. eLife. 2015;4:e10308. doi: 10.7554/eLife.10308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Maratheftis CI, Bolaraki PE, Voulgarelis M. GATA-1 transcription factor is up-regulated in bone marrow hematopoietic progenitor CD34(+) and erythroid CD71(+) cells in myelodysplastic syndromes. American Journal of Hematology. 2007;82:887–892. doi: 10.1002/ajh.20993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Menon MP, Fang J, Wojchowski DM. Core erythropoietin receptor signals for late erythroblast development. Blood. 2006;107:2662–2672. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-02-0684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Menon V, Lin M, Liang R, Arif T, Menon A, Breda L, Rivella S, Ghaffari S. Elevated P21 (CDKN1a) Mediates β-thalassemia erythroid apoptosis but its loss does not improve β-thalassemic erythropoiesis. bioRxiv. 2022 doi: 10.1101/2022.03.03.482874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  58. Muckenthaler MU, Rivella S, Hentze MW, Galy B. A red carpet for iron metabolism. Cell. 2017;168:344–361. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Nai A, Lidonnici MR, Rausa M, Mandelli G, Pagani A, Silvestri L, Ferrari G, Camaschella C. The second transferrin receptor regulates red blood cell production in mice. Blood. 2015;125:1170–1179. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-08-596254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Nai A, Lidonnici MR, Federico G, Pettinato M, Olivari V, Carrillo F, Geninatti Crich S, Ferrari G, Camaschella C, Silvestri L, Carlomagno F. NCOA4-mediated ferritinophagy in macrophages is crucial to sustain erythropoiesis in mice. Haematologica. 2021;106:795–805. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2019.241232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Nakamaki T, Kawabata H, Saito B, Matsunawa M, Suzuki J, Adachi D, Tomoyasu S, Phillip Koeffler H. Elevated levels of transferrin receptor 2 mRNA, not transferrin receptor 1 mRNA, are associated with increased survival in acute myeloid leukaemia. British Journal of Haematology. 2004;125:42–49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.04866.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Neumann CA, Krause DS, Carman CV, Das S, Dubey DP, Abraham JL, Bronson RT, Fujiwara Y, Orkin SH, Van Etten RA. Essential role for the peroxiredoxin Prdx1 in erythrocyte antioxidant defence and tumour suppression. Nature. 2003;424:561–565. doi: 10.1038/nature01819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Oliva EN, Ronco F, Marino A, Alati C, Praticò G, Nobile F. Iron chelation therapy associated with improvement of hematopoiesis in transfusion-dependent patients. Transfusion. 2010;50:1568–1570. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02617.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Pan Z, Voehringer DW, Meyn RE. Analysis of redox regulation of cytochrome c-induced apoptosis in a cell-free system. Cell Death and Differentiation. 1999;6:683–688. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Pellagatti A, Cazzola M, Giagounidis A, Perry J, Malcovati L, Della Porta MG, Jädersten M, Killick S, Verma A, Norbury CJ, Hellström-Lindberg E, Wainscoat JS, Boultwood J. Deregulated gene expression pathways in myelodysplastic syndrome hematopoietic stem cells. Leukemia. 2010;24:756–764. doi: 10.1038/leu.2010.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Philpott CC. The flux of iron through ferritin in erythrocyte development. Current Opinion in Hematology. 2018;25:183–188. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Rishi G, Secondes ES, Wallace DF, Subramaniam VN. Hematopoietic deletion of transferrin receptor 2 in mice leads to a block in erythroid differentiation during iron-deficient anemia. American Journal of Hematology. 2016;91:812–818. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Rollison DE, Howlader N, Smith MT, Strom SS, Merritt WD, Ries LA, Edwards BK, List AF. Epidemiology of myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myeloproliferative disorders in the United States, 2001-2004, using data from the NAACCR and SEER programs. Blood. 2008;112:45–52. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-01-134858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Ryu MS, Zhang D, Protchenko O, Shakoury-Elizeh M, Philpott CC. PCBP1 and NCOA4 regulate erythroid iron storage and heme biosynthesis. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2017;127:1786–1797. doi: 10.1172/JCI90519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Schafer AI, Cheron RG, Dluhy R, Cooper B, Gleason RE, Soeldner JS, Bunn HF. Clinical consequences of acquired transfusional iron overload in adults. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1981;304:319–324. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198102053040603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Schmidt PJ, Racie T, Westerman M, Fitzgerald K, Butler JS, Fleming MD. Combination therapy with a Tmprss6 RNAi-therapeutic and the oral iron chelator deferiprone additively diminishes secondary iron overload in a mouse model of β-thalassemia intermedia. American Journal of Hematology. 2015;90:310–313. doi: 10.1002/ajh.23934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Slape C, Lin YW, Hartung H, Zhang Z, Wolff L, Aplan PD. NUP98-HOX translocations lead to myelodysplastic syndrome in mice and men. JNCI Monographs. 2008;2008:64–68. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgn014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Sohn YS, Breuer W, Munnich A, Cabantchik ZI. Redistribution of accumulated cell iron: a modality of chelation with therapeutic implications. Blood. 2008;111:1690–1699. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-07-102335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Sulahian R, Cleaver O, Huang LJ. Ligand-induced EpoR internalization is mediated by JAK2 and p85 and is impaired by mutations responsible for primary familial and congenital polycythemia. Blood. 2009;113:5287–5297. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-09-179572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Suragani RNVS, Cadena SM, Cawley SM, Sako D, Mitchell D, Li R, Davies MV, Alexander MJ, Devine M, Loveday KS, Underwood KW, Grinberg AV, Quisel JD, Chopra R, Pearsall RS, Seehra J, Kumar R. Transforming growth factor-β superfamily ligand trap ACE-536 corrects anemia by promoting late-stage erythropoiesis. Nature Medicine. 2014;20:408–414. doi: 10.1038/nm.3512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Taoka K, Kumano K, Nakamura F, Hosoi M, Goyama S, Imai Y, Hangaishi A, Kurokawa M. The effect of iron overload and chelation on erythroid differentiation. International Journal of Hematology. 2012;95:149–159. doi: 10.1007/s12185-011-0988-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Tibaldi E, Federti E, Matte A, Iatcenko I, Wilson AB, Riccardi V, Pagano MA, De Franceschi L. Oxidation impacts the intracellular signaling machinery in hematological disorders. Antioxidants. 2020;9:353. doi: 10.3390/antiox9040353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Torrance JD, Bothwell TH. In: Methods in Haematology. Cook JD, editor. Churchill Livingstone; 1980. Tissue iron stores; pp. 90–115. [Google Scholar]
  79. Veneri D, Franchini M, Krampera M, de Matteis G, Solero P, Pizzolo G. Analysis of HFE and TFR2 gene mutations in patients with acute leukemia. Leukemia Research. 2005;29:661–664. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2005.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Zeidan AM, Fradette C, Rozova A, Toiber Temin N, Tricta F. Safety of deferiprone in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: results from the deferiprone us safety registry and a compassionate use program. Blood. 2022;140:1115–1117. doi: 10.1182/blood-2022-169074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  81. Zhao B, Mei Y, Yang J, Ji P. Erythropoietin-regulated oxidative stress negatively affects enucleation during terminal erythropoiesis. Experimental Hematology. 2016a;44:975–981. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2016.06.249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Zhao B, Tan TL, Mei Y, Yang J, Yu Y, Verma A, Liang Y, Gao J, Ji P. H2AX deficiency is associated with erythroid dysplasia and compromised haematopoietic stem cell function. Scientific Reports. 2016b;6:19589. doi: 10.1038/srep19589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Editor's evaluation

Yongliang Yang 1

This study presents a valuable finding on the preclinical studies of chelating agents deferiprone (DFP) as potential therapeutics in Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS). The evidence supporting the claims of the authors is solid. The work will be of interest to clinicians or biologists working on MDS.

Decision letter

Editor: Yongliang Yang1
Reviewed by: Yongliang Yang2

Our editorial process produces two outputs: i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "Iron Chelation Improves Ineffective Erythropoiesis and Iron Overload in Myelodysplastic Syndrome Mice" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 3 peer reviewers, including Yongliang Yang as Reviewing Editor and Reviewer #1, and the evaluation has been overseen by Caigang Liu as the Senior Editor.

The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.

Essential revisions:

1) The authors should provide solid evidence and elaborate on the choice of mouse model. The NUP98-HOXD13 mouse model of MDS recapitulates spontaneous (non-transfusion related) iron overload seen in some subtypes of MDS.

2) The authors should clarify the rationale for the choice of deferiprone as the iron chelator.

3) There are also substantial technical concerns and some aspects that need to be updated to current standards.

4) It would be important to present representative gating from all 3 animal groups: WT, MDS, and MDS+DFP mice.

5) In the Statistical analysis section, the authors state that all comparisons were done with 2-tailed student paired t test, which would not be appropriate for comparisons being made between independent animals groups.

6) All the referees raised concerns about Figure 10. The schematic diagram is rather difficult to follow and therefore should be amended.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

Some specific points are as follows,

1. The authors should elaborate in a separate paragraph in the Discussion section to justify their choice of NUP98-HOXD13 mice as representative of low-risk MDS for their experiments. In particular, the authors should carefully explain and comment such that the reader could understand the appropriateness and preclinical potential of NUP98-HOXD13 mice model for the study of low-risk MDS. This is crucial for the reader to fully appreciate the values and merits of their manuscript.

2. Agranulocytosis was implicated as side effects of DFP treatment for transfusional iron overload in clinical practice. The authors need to elaborate in a paragraph to project and discuss the possible adverse events of DFP chelation therapy for low-risk MDS patients should it be approved.

3. Table 1, caption, "Characteristics of NHD13 mice are consistent with elevated MCV anemia with expanded hematopoiesis and iron overload which is appropriate as a mouse model of MDS". There exists grammar mistakes in this caption and therefore it is difficult to understand. This should be fixed.

4. Figure 10, the schematic diagram is rather difficult to follow and understand for the readers. The authors should try to highlight the key differences under three conditions. Some details (font size et al.) should be polished as well.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

There are also substantial technical concerns and some aspects that need to be updated to current standards (the manuscript appears to have been written a long time ago):

1. The rationale for the choice of deferiprone as the iron chelator is weak, since most of the clinical data were reported with deferasirox. It would be better to do an initial comparison of the two agents to document if they affect anemia and ineffective erythropoiesis differentially (along the lines of Figure 2 and 3E). This would put the DFP data in the paper in a more appropriate context.

2. The graph style needs to be updated to change bar graphs to scatterplots with error bars. This also allows display of mouse sex using different symbols (instead of “data not shown”).

3. Supplementary figures 3A and 3B use only 2 mice? Which band is FTH?

4. Supplementary figure 4 is very poor quality and cannot be used for quantification.

5. Supplementary figure 9 does not show visible changes in pStat5. With n = 3 mice the changes would have to be large to be significant.

6. Erfe is the approved gene symbol for erythroferrone https://www.genenames.org/data/gene-symbol-report/#!/hgnc_id/HGNC:26727

7. Figure 7C: Why was Figure 7C normalized to ProE? Supplementary Figure 13 seems more informative about the lack of differences between WT, MDS and MDS-DFP.

8. Figure 10 was not helpful to my understanding of the proposed model in the context of the data in this manuscript. For example, if TfR2 expression does not change between the groups per previous results, what is the evidence that it differentially affects EpoR signaling in this model?

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations for the authors):

Below are some suggestions that I believe would strengthen the science and its presentation.

1. In certain areas of the Results, the authors appear to overstate their conclusions. For example, on p. 8, the authors state that "… reversal of ineffective erythropoiesis… leads to restored Hamp responsiveness." While the authors show a correlation between improved erythropoiesis and improved Hamp responsiveness to iron stores, the wording here should be modified, as the authors do not prove causation.

2. Statistical analysis: Paired t tests may not be appropriate for those comparisons that do not involve repeated measures on the same groups. Consider an unpaired T test, or preferably a one-way ANOVA with an appropriate posthoc test. When the same groups are analyzed for multiple parameters (e.g. comparisons of different stages of terminal erythropoiesis in WT, MDS, and DFP-MDS groups), consider an ANOVA test with repeated measures, followed by an appropriate post-hoc test.

3. Figure 1: In addition to showing the non-heme iron content of liver and spleen, it would be valuable to present the histological distribution of iron within these organs.

eLife. 2023 Dec 28;12:e83103. doi: 10.7554/eLife.83103.sa2

Author response


Essential revisions:

1) The authors should provide solid evidence and elaborate on the choice of mouse model. The NUP98-HOXD13 mouse model of MDS recapitulates spontaneous (non-transfusion related) iron overload seen in some subtypes of MDS.

We appreciate this request for clarification. We use NUP98-HOXD13 transgenic (NHD13) mice for several reasons: (1) NHD13 mice were generated by transgenic expression of the NUP98/ HOXD13 fusion protein found in human MDS and acute myeloid leukemia, making them mechanistically meaningful as a model of MDS. (2) NHD13 mice are characterized by abortive erythroblast maturation and consequent ineffective erythropoiesis, consistent with MDS patients and of specific interest for our purposes, namely searching for a mechanistic understanding of ineffective erythropoiesis to target its amelioration. (3) NHD13 mice were successfully used in pre-clinical investigation of an activin receptor II ligand trap, reversing ineffective erythropoiesis, work that provided valuable pre-clinical proof-of-principle, leading to successful clinical trials and now FDA approval of this agent for MDS patients. Taken together, NHD13 mice are a well-established in vivo model of MDS. Given the dearth of better alternative in vivo models of MDS, these experiments lead the field in exploring the effect of DFP on ineffective erythropoiesis in MDS.

We interpret the reviewer’s inquiry specifically around whether transfusion-independent iron overload mouse models can be used to also shed light on iron overload in transfusiondependent MDS. We are, however, not looking to demonstrate DFP-mediated reversal of systemic iron overload at all; we show the expected effects of DFP on reversal of systemic iron overload only as validation, using this known effect as an expected outcome (Figure 1). The main focus of the current work is on the effects of DFP on ineffective erythropoiesis. As a consequence, we cannot use transfused NHD13 mice as transfusion itself effectively suppresses ineffective erythropoiesis, preventing its evaluation in response to DFP.

Toward addressing this comment, we have expanded our description of these mice in the Introduction and added text to the Discussion regarding the use of this mouse model in the revised manuscript.

2) The authors should clarify the rationale for the choice of deferiprone as the iron chelator.

Thank you to the editor and reviewers for this request for clarification. The rationale for choosing DFP as the iron chelator for these studies involves several known elements: 1) DFP has a lower iron binding affinity relative to transferrin (Sohn et al., 2008); 2) DFP results in iron transfer from parenchymal cells to increase serum iron, transferrin saturation, and hepcidin responsiveness to iron (Figure 1); and 3) increased hepcidin responsiveness prevents further iron absorption and recycling (Schmidt et al., 2015; Casu et al., 2016). On the foundation of this knowledge, we hypothesize that in addition to decreasing progression of systemic iron overload, DFP could also ameliorate ineffective erythropoiesis in MDS. We anticipate that the specific mechanism is reliant on the ability of DFP to donate iron to transferrin, altering the balance between different transferrin moieties in circulation, resulting in altered iron trafficking within erythroblasts and enhancing erythroblast differentiation.

To clarify our rationale for choosing DFP, we have expanded this part of the Introduction in the revised manuscript.

3) There are also substantial technical concerns and some aspects that need to be updated to current standards.

We anticipate that this general comment is in reference to the specific technical elements raised by Reviewer #2. These have been addressed (see below).

4) It would be important to present representative gating from all 3 animal groups: WT, MDS, and MDS+DFP mice.

We appreciate this comment and have added representative gating for all 3 groups to Supplementary Figure 17 (new Figure 3 —figure supplement 6).

5) In the Statistical analysis section, the authors state that all comparisons were done with 2-tailed student paired t test, which would not be appropriate for comparisons being made between independent animals groups.

We appreciate this comment and have reanalyzed all revised mouse data using one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons and Tukey post-test analyses when more than 2 groups were compared. This has been edited in the Methods section in the revised manuscript.

6) All the referees raised concerns about Figure 10. The schematic diagram is rather difficult to follow and therefore should be amended.

We have modified Figure 10 to simplify and increase clarity in response to the reviewers’ comments, highlighting only the differences in erythroblast iron trafficking between control, MDS, and DFP-treated MDS conditions as the reviewers suggest.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

Some specific points are as follows,

1. The authors should elaborate in a separate paragraph in the Discussion section to justify their choice of NUP98-HOXD13 mice as representative of low-risk MDS for their experiments. In particular, the authors should carefully explain and comment such that the reader could understand the appropriateness and preclinical potential of NUP98-HOXD13 mice model for the study of low-risk MDS. This is crucial for the reader to fully appreciate the values and merits of their manuscript.

We appreciate this request for clarification. We use NUP98-HOXD13 transgenic (NHD13) mice for several reasons: 1) NHD13 mice were generated by transgenic expression of the NUP98/ HOXD13 fusion protein found in human MDS and acute myeloid leukemia, making them mechanistically meaningful as a model of MDS. 2) NHD13 mice are characterized by abortive erythroblast maturation and consequent ineffective erythropoiesis, consistent with MDS patients and of specific interest for our purposes, namely searching for a mechanistic understanding of ineffective erythropoiesis to target its amelioration. 3) NHD13 mice were successfully used in pre-clinical investigation of an activin receptor II ligand trap, reversing ineffective erythropoiesis, work that provided valuable pre-clinical proof-of-principle, leading to successful clinical trials and now FDA approval of this agent for MDS patients. Taken together, NHD13 mice are a well-established in vivo model of MDS. Given the dearth of better alternative in vivo models of MDS, these experiments lead the field in exploring the effect of DFP on ineffective erythropoiesis in MDS.

We interpret the reviewer’s inquiry specifically around whether transfusion-independent iron overload mouse models can be used to also shed light on iron overload in transfusion dependent MDS. We are, however, not looking to demonstrate DFP-mediated reversal of systemic iron overload at all; we show the expected effects of DFP on reversal of systemic iron overload only as validation, using this known effect as an expected outcome (Figure 1). The main focus of the current work is on the effects of DFP on ineffective erythropoiesis. As a consequence, we cannot use transfused NHD13 mice as transfusion itself effectively suppresses ineffective erythropoiesis, preventing its evaluation in response to DFP.

Toward addressing this comment, we have expanded our description of these mice in the Introduction and added text to the Discussion regarding the use of this mouse model in the revised manuscript.

2. Agranulocytosis was implicated as side effects of DFP treatment for transfusional iron overload in clinical practice. The authors need to elaborate in a paragraph to project and discuss the possible adverse events of DFP chelation therapy for low-risk MDS patients should it be approved.

While the purpose of the current work was to provide a rationale to specifically target erythroblast-specific iron sensing and trafficking which here was accomplished by DFP, we appreciate this forward-looking comment and have added more data about agranulocytosis to the Discussion section of the revised manuscript:

“In addition, with an eye toward its translation, the use of DFP has been associated with the occurrence of severe neutropenia/agranulocytosis defined as an absolute neutrophil count below 0.5 x 109 cells/L. A recent report from the US safety registry of DFP indicates a potentially higher incidence of agranulocytosis in 115 patients with MDS, all resolved with dose interruption (Zeidan et al., 2022). The report concludes that the safety profile of DFP in MDS is potentially consistent with that of other iron-loading anemias with no new safety concerns or unexpected adverse events. However, it remains to be determined whether agranulocytosis occurs at higher frequency than with other iron chelating agents in MDS, is a specific consequence unique to the patients’ primary disease, or resulted from the relatively small sample size in this registry. Thus, although additional evidence is needed to ascertain the mechanism(s) and clinical relevance of DFP-induced agranulocytosis in MDS patients in anticipation of its translation, no change in white blood cell count was observed in mice and potential benefits may ultimately be found to outweigh the risks. “

3. Table 1, caption, "Characteristics of NHD13 mice are consistent with elevated MCV anemia with expanded hematopoiesis and iron overload which is appropriate as a mouse model of MDS". There exists grammar mistakes in this caption and therefore it is difficult to understand. This should be fixed.

We have modified the caption for Table I to “Hematopoiesis- and Iron-Related Characteristics of NHD13 Mice” in accordance with this comment.

4. Figure 10, the schematic diagram is rather difficult to follow and understand for the readers. The authors should try to highlight the key differences under three conditions. Some details (font size et al.) should be polished as well.

We have modified Figure 10 to simplify and increase clarity in response to the reviewers’ comments, highlighting only the differences in erythroblast iron trafficking between control, MDS, and DFP-treated MDS conditions as the reviewers suggest.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

There are also substantial technical concerns and some aspects that need to be updated to current standards (the manuscript appears to have been written a long time ago):

1. The rationale for the choice of deferiprone as the iron chelator is weak, since most of the clinical data were reported with deferasirox. It would be better to do an initial comparison of the two agents to document if they affect anemia and ineffective erythropoiesis differentially (along the lines of Figure 2 and 3E). This would put the DFP data in the paper in a more appropriate context.

Thank you for this request for clarification. While we appreciate the reviewer’s interest in comparing DFP with DFX, this comparison is outside of the scope of our current manuscript and would be more useful in patients after the preclinical study is complete.

The rationale for choosing DFP as the iron chelator for these studies involves several known elements: 1) DFP has a lower iron binding affinity relative to transferrin (Sohn et al., 2008); 2) DFP results in iron transfer from parenchymal cells to increase serum iron, transferrin saturation, and hepcidin responsiveness to iron (Figure 1); and 3) increased hepcidin responsiveness prevents further iron absorption and recycling (Schmidt et al., 2015; Casu et al., 2016). On the foundation of this knowledge, we hypothesize that in addition to decreasing progression of systemic iron overload, DFP could also ameliorate ineffective erythropoiesis in MDS. We anticipate that the specific mechanism is reliant on the ability of DFP to donate iron to transferrin, altering the balance between different transferrin moieties in circulation, resulting in altered iron trafficking within erythroblasts and enhancing erythroblast differentiation.

To clarify our rationale for choosing DFP, we have expanded this part of the Introduction in the revised manuscript.

2. The graph style needs to be updated to change bar graphs to scatterplots with error bars. This also allows display of mouse sex using different symbols (instead of “data not shown”).

We appreciate this comment. Similarly elevated transferrin saturation (a) (n = 3-4 male mice/group and n = 4-6 female mice/group) and hemoglobin (b) (n = 4-6 male mice/group and n = 4-9 female mice/group) are observed in male and female DFP-treated MDS mice. (c) Bone marrow erythroblasts are decreased to a greater degree in male relative to female DFP-treated MDS mice (n = 4-7 male mice/group and n = 8-9 female mice/group). We have added the data on gender-specific measures to new Figure 1 —figure supplement 3, Figure 2 —figure supplement 1, and Figure 3 —figure supplement 1 in the revised manuscript.

We have also remade all figures in accordance with this comment, now presenting scatterplots with error bars.

3. Supplementary figures 3A and 3B use only 2 mice? Which band is FTH?

We appreciate this comment. This experiment was repeated twice with similar results. We present a single gel in Supplementary Figure 3 (Figure 1 —figure supplement 4 in the revised manuscript), now also with a bar noting which band is FTH1, but have reanalyzed the data with both gels together which results in no statistically significant difference. This has been updated in the text.

4. Supplementary figure 4 is very poor quality and cannot be used for quantification.

We appreciate this comment. In response, we opted to measure mRNA expression of the inflammatory marker Saa1 in the liver; new data on Saa1 expression is now included in new Figure 1 —figure supplement 5 of the revised manuscript in addition to STAT3 signaling in the liver, both demonstrating no differences in the inflammatory component of hepcidin regulation.

5. Supplementary figure 9 does not show visible changes in pStat5. With n = 3 mice the changes would have to be large to be significant.

We appreciate this comment and agree with the reviewer that there are no visible changes. We have also attempted to repeat this analysis without succeeding in improving the quality of the pSTAT5 gel. We refocused Supplementary Figure 9 (new Figure 4 —figure supplement 2 in the revised manuscript) on MDS bone marrow samples in response to Reviewer #3, the data providing sufficient confidence that DFP does not significantly alter these signaling pathways.

6. Erfe is the approved gene symbol for erythroferrone https://www.genenames.org/data/gene-symbol-report/#!/hgnc_id/HGNC:26727

We appreciate this information and have changed Fam132b to Erfe in Figures 1 and 9, Supplementary Figure 5 (new Figure 1 —figure supplement 6), and throughout the text in the revised manuscript.

7. Figure 7C: Why was Figure 7C normalized to ProE? Supplementary Figure 13 seems more informative about the lack of differences between WT, MDS and MDS-DFP.

We appreciate this query and have presented the data in Figure 7C (new Figure 7C, 7D, and 7E in the revised manuscript) in a way that is similar to Supplementary Figure 13 (new Figure 7 —figure supplement 1). The evidence is complementary. The Supplementary Figure data provides evidence of Tfr2 expression changes during erythroblast differentiation relative to the stage prior in each model while the Figure 7C-7E data enable an additional appreciation of cumulative differences relative to WT ProE, demonstrating that Tfr2 expression is relatively decreased in BasoE, PolyE, and OrthoE in MDS mouse bone marrow and does not significantly increase in DFP-treated mouse erythroblasts.

8. Figure 10 was not helpful to my understanding of the proposed model in the context of the data in this manuscript. For example, if TfR2 expression does not change between the groups per previous results, what is the evidence that it differentially affects EpoR signaling in this model?

We have modified Figure 10 to simplify and increase clarity in response to the reviewers’ comments, highlighting only the differences in erythroblast iron trafficking between control, MDS, and DFP-treated MDS conditions as the reviewers suggest.

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations for the authors):

Below are some suggestions that I believe would strengthen the science and its presentation.

1. In certain areas of the Results, the authors appear to overstate their conclusions. For example, on p. 8, the authors state that "… reversal of ineffective erythropoiesis… leads to restored Hamp responsiveness." While the authors show a correlation between improved erythropoiesis and improved Hamp responsiveness to iron stores, the wording here should be modified, as the authors do not prove causation.

We agree with the reviewer and have modified this statement in the revised manuscript to better align the results with the conclusions.

2. Statistical analysis: Paired t tests may not be appropriate for those comparisons that do not involve repeated measures on the same groups. Consider an unpaired T test, or preferably a one-way ANOVA with an appropriate posthoc test. When the same groups are analyzed for multiple parameters (e.g. comparisons of different stages of terminal erythropoiesis in WT, MDS, and DFP-MDS groups), consider an ANOVA test with repeated measures, followed by an appropriate post-hoc test.

We appreciate this comment and have reanalyzed all revised mouse data using one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons and Tukey post-test analyses when more than 2 groups were compared. This has been edited in the Methods section in the revised manuscript.

3. Figure 1: In addition to showing the non-heme iron content of liver and spleen, it would be valuable to present the histological distribution of iron within these organs.

In accordance with this reviewer’s comment, we provide liver and spleen sections evaluated by immunohistochemistry, stained with Prussian blue to identify intracellular iron stores (Author response image 1). In the liver, this method is insufficiently sensitive to demonstrate differences seen with more quantifiable methods. In the spleen, iron distribution is as expected in the red pulp. While we are not confident that these results are additionally valuable, we could, however, at the reviewer behest, add these figures to the Supplement.

Author response image 1.

Author response image 1.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Pellagatti A, Boultwood J, Wainscoat JS. 2010. Expression data from bone marrow CD34+ cells of MDS patients and healthy controls. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE19429

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 1—source data 1. Source data for iron-related parameters in wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.
    Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Source data for flow analysis of apoptosis measured by activated caspase 3/7 in bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) mice.
    Figure 1—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Source data for serum deferiprone (DFP) concentration in DFP-treated wild type (WT) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) mice.
    Figure 1—figure supplement 3—source data 1. Source data for transferrin saturation in male and female myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and DFP-treated MDS mice.
    Figure 1—figure supplement 4—source data 1. Western blots with ferritin H antibody staining relative to actin in bone marrow erythroblast enriched CD45 negative cells from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.
    Figure 1—figure supplement 4—source data 2. Source data for quantification of ferritin heavy chain (FTH1) protein concentration relative to actin in bone marrow erythroblast enriched CD45 negative cells from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.
    Figure 1—figure supplement 5—source data 1. Western blots with STAT3 and pSTAT3 antibody staining relative to GAPDH in liver from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.
    Figure 1—figure supplement 5—source data 2. Source data for Saa1 in liver from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.
    Figure 1—figure supplement 6—source data 1. Source data for erythroferrone (Erfe) in sorted bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT) and DFP-treated WT mice.
    Figure 2—source data 1. Source data for circulating cell counts and other parameters in wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.
    Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Source data for hemoglobin in male and female myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and DFP-treated MDS mice.
    Figure 3—source data 1. Source data for erythropoiesis-related parameters in serum, bone marrow, and spleen from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.
    Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Source data for bone marrow erythroblasts in male and female myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and DFP-treated MDS mice.
    Figure 3—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Source data for circulating red blood cell parameters and serum erythropoietin from wild type (WT) and DFP-treated WT mice.
    Figure 3—figure supplement 3—source data 1. Source data for total bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT) and DFP-treated WT mice.
    Figure 3—figure supplement 3—source data 2. Source data for bone marrow ProE, BasoE, PolyE, and OrthoE erythroblasts from wild type (WT) and DFP-treated WT mice.
    Figure 3—figure supplement 4—source data 1. Source data for bone marrow erythroblast apoptosis as measured by activated caspase 3/7 and ROS from wild type (WT) and DFP-treated WT mice.
    Figure 3—figure supplement 5—source data 1. Source data for serum DFP and G-DFP concentrations from DFP-treated wild type (WT) and MDS mice.
    Figure 4—source data 1. Source data for gene expression downstream of erythropoietin (EPO) in sorted bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.
    Figure 4—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Source data for B cell lymphoma (Bcl11a) in sorted bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT) and DFP-treated WT mice.
    Figure 4—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Western blots with pSTAT5, STAT5, pAKT, and AKT antibody staining relative to actin in bone marrow erythroblast-enriched CD45 negative cells from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and DFP-treated MDS mice.
    Figure 4—figure supplement 2—source data 2. Source data for quantification of signaling via STAT5 and AKT in bone marrow erythroblast-enriched CD45 negative cells from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and DFP-treated MDS mice.
    Figure 5—source data 1. Source data for erythropoietin receptor (Epor) in sorted bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.
    Figure 5—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Source data for erythropoietin receptor (Epor) in sorted bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT) and DFP-treated WT mice.
    Figure 5—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Source data for flow analysis of enucleation in erythroblasts from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.
    Figure 6—source data 1. Source data for flow analysis of cell surface TFR1 and Tfrc in sorted bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.
    Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Source data for flow analysis of cell surface transferrin receptor 1 (TFR1) on bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT) and DFP-treated WT mice.
    Figure 6—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Source data for Tfrc in sorted bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT) and DFP-treated WT mice.
    Figure 7—source data 1. Source data for flow analysis of cell surface transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2), TFR2 protein concentration in bone marrow erythroblast-enriched CD45 negative cells, and TFR2, in sorted bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome(MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.
    Figure 7—source data 2. Western blots with transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2) antibody staining relative to actin in bone marrow erythroblast enriched CD45 negative cells from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.
    Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Source data for transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2) in sorted bone marrow BasoE, PolyE, and OrthoE from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.
    Figure 7—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Source data for Scribble (Scrib) in sorted bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.
    Figure 8—source data 1. Source data for Pcbp1 and Ncoa4 in sorted bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.
    Figure 8—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Source data for Pcbp2 in sorted bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.
    Figure 8—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Source data for glutathione peroxidase 4 (Gpx4) in sorted bone marrow erythroblasts from wild type (WT), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and DFP-treated MDS mice.
    Figure 9—source data 1. Source data for iron metabolism-related genes in bone marrow stem and progenitor cells from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients vs. controls.
    Supplementary file 1. Tables of reagents used for PCR and western blot experiments.

    (a) Table of primers. (b) Table of antibodies.

    elife-83103-supp1.docx (21.8KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file. Source data files have been provided for Figures 1–9.

    The following previously published dataset was used:

    Pellagatti A, Boultwood J, Wainscoat JS. 2010. Expression data from bone marrow CD34+ cells of MDS patients and healthy controls. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus. GSE19429


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES