Abstract
Background
The effect of platelet factor 4 (PF4) on bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) and osteoporosis is poorly understood. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of PF4‐triggered bone destruction in mice and determine the underlying mechanism.
Methods
First, in vitro cell proliferation and cell cycle of BMMSCs were assessed using a CCK8 assay and flow cytometry, respectively. Osteogenic differentiation was confirmed using staining and quantification of alkaline phosphatase and Alizarin Red S. Next, an osteoporotic mouse model was established by performing bilateral ovariectomy (OVX). Furthermore, the PF4 concentrations were obtained using enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. The bone microarchitecture of the femur was evaluated using microCT and histological analyses. Finally, the key regulators of osteogenesis and pathways were investigated using quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting.
Results
Human PF4 widely and moderately decreased the cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation ability of BMMSCs. Furthermore, the levels of PF4 in the serum and bone marrow were generally increased, whereas bone microarchitecture deteriorated due to OVX. Moreover, in vivo mouse PF4 supplementation triggered bone deterioration of the femur. In addition, several key regulators of osteogenesis were downregulated, and the integrin α5‐focal adhesion kinase‐extracellular signal‐regulated kinase (ITGA5‐FAK‐ERK) pathway was inhibited due to PF4 supplementation.
Conclusions
PF4 may be attributed to OVX‐induced bone loss triggered by the suppression of bone formation in vivo and alleviate BMMSC osteogenic differentiation by inhibiting the ITGA5‐FAK‐ERK pathway.
Keywords: bone loss, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, integrin α5, osteogenesis, platelet factor 4
Platelet factor 4 alleviated proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell s through inhibiting the integrin α5‐focal adhesion kinase‐extracellular signal‐regulated kinase pathway, which may be related to ovariectomy‐induced bone loss.
1. INTRODUCTION
Osteoporosis is a chronic syndrome characterized by the loss of bone mass and destruction of the bone microarchitecture, which finally leads to excessive skeletal fragility. 1 Mechanistically, osteoporosis occurs due to an imbalance between osteoblast‐mediated bone formation and bone resorption by osteoclasts (i.e., a higher level of bone resorption than bone formation). 2 Current strategies for osteoporotic prevention and treatment focus on promoting bone regeneration, suppressing bone resorption, or a combination of both. 3 Recently, some targeted drugs for osteoporosis have been approved for clinical use and exhibit excellent curative effects. 4 , 5 , 6
As a predominant source of osteoblasts, it is crucial to maintain osteogenic differentiation and proliferation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) to preserve bone homeostasis. 7 Furthermore, several studies have revealed that BMMSC‐mediated osteogenic differentiation and proliferation can be downregulated or impaired by multiple factors in the bone marrow (BM), which is markedly associated with osteoporosis. 8 , 9 , 10
It has been well established that the osteogenic differentiation and proliferation of BMMSCs is suppressed by several cytokines 11 , 12 , 13 ; however, the relationship between some cytokines and BMMSCs is unclear. Platelet factor 4 (PF4), also termed C‐X‐C motif ligand 4 (CXCL4), is a 7.8‐kDa platelet α‐granule protein synthesized by megakaryocytes in the BM and belongs to the CXC chemokine subfamily. 14 In general, PF4 plays multiple roles in modulating hematopoiesis, angiogenesis, and cell proliferation. 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 Recent research has demonstrated that PF4 secretion by megakaryocytes can directly regulate hemopoietic stem cell (HSC) quiescence in the local HSC niche of the BM. Similarly, the percentage of HSCs was lower after treatment with PF4 compared with those treated with PBS. 21 However, the specific role of PF4 in BMMSCs has never been elucidated. Given the multiple physiological effects of PF4, we speculated that it may downregulate the proliferation or osteogenic differentiation of BMMSCs, which may be relevant to osteoporosis.
Recently, several studies have elucidated that platelet factors regulate the function of recipient cells through integrins, which belong to the family of transmembrane adhesion receptors formed by the 19 α and 8 β subunits. 22 , 23 , 24 These subunits can interact to form 24 heterodimeric receptors via noncovalent binding, which exist on the recipient cell surface to recognize and respond to various proteins, such as PF4, platelet factor XIII, or osteopontin. 25 Therefore, integrins play roles in regulating cellular proliferation, migration, and differentiation. 26 Moreover, integrin signaling can be transduced into the cytoplasm by intracellular signaling molecules, such as focal adhesion kinase (FAK), which can directly bind to focal adhesion sites located in the cytoplasmic domain of integrin. In addition, several downstream molecules are involved in integrin‐FAK pathways, such as extracellular signal‐regulated kinase (ERK), which can directly inhibit caspase 9 activation by phosphorylation of Thr125 located in the conserved mitogen‐activated protein kinase consensus site. 27
Therefore, this study aimed to confirm the relationship between PF4 and osteoporosis, evaluate the effects of PF4‐triggered bone destruction in mice in vivo, and determine the mechanism underlying the suppression of osteogenesis or proliferation of BMMSCs induced by PF4.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Cell proliferation and migration assays
To explore the effects of PF4 on BMMSC proliferation and migration, CCK8 and transwell assays were performed. 28 , 29 Briefly, human BMMSCs (Science Cell Research Laboratories) were cultivated in maintenance medium (Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/mL of penicillin G, and 100 mg/mL of streptomycin) (GIBCO) at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. BMMSCs at passages 3–5 were cocultured with PBS, 0.2 μg/mL of recombinant human PF4 (hPF4, Sigma‐Aldrich), 1 μg/mL of hPF4, and 1 μg/mL of hPF4 and 30 μg/mL of heparin (hPF4 antagonist) (Sigma‐Aldrich). CCK8 (Dojindo Laboratories) and transwell assays were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. All cell‐based experiments were repeated at least thrice.
2.2. Flow cytometry
To investigate the effects of PF4 on the cell cycle, BMMSCs treated as mentioned earlier were measured using flow cytometry (FCM). 30 Briefly, BMMSCs were harvested, resuspended in PBS, and fixed using cold alcohol. Subsequently, PI/RNase staining buffer biosciences, Inc. (BD) was added to the BMMSCs and incubated. Finally, the cell cycle was tested using a BD LSRII flow cytometer BD.
2.3. Staining and quantification of alkaline phosphatase and Alizarin Red S
To investigate the osteogenic effect of PF4 on BMMSCs, staining and quantification of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and Alizarin Red S (ARS) were undertaken. 31 First, hBMMSCs were seeded at 40 000 cells/well in six‐well plates and cultured in an osteogenic medium (OM, maintenance medium containing 10 nM dexamethasone, 10 mM β‐glycerophosphate, and 0.2 mM l‐ascorbic acid [Sigma‐Aldrich]). hBMMSCs were first stained with an NBT/BCIP staining kit (CoWin Biotech) after culturing for 1 week for ALP and with a 2% ARS staining solution (Sigma‐Aldrich) after culturing for 3 weeks for ARS.
2.4. Animals and administration procedure
Eight‐week‐old female C57BL6/J mice (Vital River Inc.) were housed in the specific‐pathogen‐free room in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Peking University Health Science Center (approval number: LA2019019; Beijing, China). First, to explore the relationship between PF4 and osteoporosis, a classic osteoporotic animal model was established via a ligaturing bilateral OVX. Generally, 60 mice were split into 10 groups of 6 mice, and the bilateral OVX was ligated using standard methods. 32 After surgery, euthanasia was performed on each group every 2 weeks (at least) until week 12. The serum and BM of the tibia were obtained to detect the concentration of PF4 using enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or the relative expression of Pf4 using quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). To obtain BM from the tibia, the tibia was dissected free from soft tissue thoroughly, and the tip of the tibia was removed using a rongeur. Next, the BM was flushed with maintenance medium (for ELISA) or TRIzol (for qPCR) (Life Technologies) by inserting a sterilized syringe needle into one end of the bone. In addition, the femurs were dissected for microCT and histology. To investigate the effects on PF4‐induced bone loss, 30 mice were split into three groups comprising 10 mice and treated with PBS, 2 μg of recombinant mouse PF4 (mPF4), and 5 μg of mPF4 (i.p., dissolved in normal saline, every other day) (Sigma‐Aldrich). The mice were euthanized 8 weeks after the injection. Tissues were obtained using the aforementioned methods.
2.5. MicroCT analysis
To evaluate the differences in bone morphometry in these groups, microCT was performed using an Inveon MM system (Siemens). 33 Briefly, the images of the femurs were obtained using the following parameters: pixel size, 9.21 μm; current, 220 μA; voltage, 60 kV; and exposure time, 1500 ms. The bone mineral density (BMD) and bone morphometric parameters were analyzed using Inveon Research Workplace software (Siemens).
2.6. Histological analysis
To further confirm PF4‐induced bone loss, the femurs were decalcified using a 10% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid solution after fixation in formalin. Five‐micron slices were obtained using standard procedures and stained with H&E.
To investigate the histomorphometric changes in bone dynamics, undecalcified bone slicing and subsequent analyses were performed. 34 Briefly, on the 10th and 3rd days prior to euthanasia, the mice were intraperitoneally injected with alizarin‐3‐methyliminodiacetic acid (30 mg/kg, Sigma‐Aldrich) and calcein (10 mg/kg, Sigma‐Aldrich), respectively. The femurs were ground and polished into ~50 μm slices using the EXAKT precision cutting and grinding system (EXAKT Apparatebau). Subsequently, dynamic histomorphometric parameters were analyzed using Bioquant software (BioQuant).
2.7. Enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay
An ELISA was used to test the concentration of PF4 in the serum and BM from the tibia. In brief, the serum was separated from the blood, and BM supernatants were flushed out using PBS. A PF4 ELISA kit (R&D Systems) was used to detect the concentration of PF4 in the serum and BM according to the manufacturer's standard operating procedures. At a minimum, the samples were tested in duplicate.
2.8. RNA extraction and qPCR
The total RNA of BMMSCs treated with different factors was extracted using an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). cDNA was synthesized using a PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (Takara). qPCR was performed using a 7500 real‐time PCR detection system (Applied Biosystems). The primers are provided in Table S1, and the procedure was performed as follows: 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min. Finally, the data were analyzed using the 2−ΔCT method through GAPDH/Gapdh for normalization. 35
2.9. Construction of ITGA5i and ITGA5 shRNA lentivirus
The silencing/overexpression of ITGA5 was performed using an ITGA5‐targeting (ITGA5i) oligonucleotide sequence or an ITGA5 overexpression lentivirus designed by GeneChem (Shanghai, China), as previously described. 36 Briefly, the ITGA5i oligonucleotide sequence was CTCCTATATGTGACCAGAGTT, and the ITGA5 overexpression lentivirus contained only the full transcript of the ITGA5 gene. In addition, the lentiviral work vector was Ubi‐MCS‐3FLAG‐SV40‐EGFP‐IRES‐puromycin. The BMMSCs were infected with the abovementioned lentivirus at a multiplicity of infection of 20.
2.10. Western blotting
Western blotting (WB) was performed using the standard procedure as previously described. 37 Briefly, the cells were lysed to obtain total protein using radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer mixed with protease inhibitor (Solarbio). Then, the lysates were centrifuged at 10 000g for 30 min at 4°C. The total protein concentrations were detected using a Pierce BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific). Protein extracts (20 μg) were separated using 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Merck Millipore). In addition, the membranes were incubated at 4°C overnight with respective primary antibodies (Abcam), including CCND1 (ab40754, 1:2000), CDK4 (ab108357, 1:1000), CDKN1B (ab32034, 1:5000), SP7 (ab209484, 1:1000), SPP1 (ab214050, 1:1000), SPARC (ab207743, 1:1000), RUNX2 (ab236639, 1:1000), COL1A1 (ab138492, 1:1000), ITGA2 (ab181548, 1:5000), ITGA5 (ab150361, 1:10000), ITGA6 (ab181551, 1:2000), ITGB1 (ab52971, INTEGRIN BETA 1, 1:10000), ITGB3 (ab119992, 1:1000), ITGB4 (ab133682, 1:1000), FAK (ab40794, 1:2000), p‐FAK (ab81298, 1:1000), ERK 1/2 (ab184699, 1:10000), p‐ERK 1/2 (ab201015, 1:1000), and GAPDH (ab181602, 1:10000), and then detected on immunoreactive protein bands after incubation for 1 h using an ECL kit (CWBIO) with horseradish peroxidase‐linked anti‐rabbit secondary antibodies.
2.11. Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 20.0 software (SPSS). An independent two‐tailed Student's t‐test or one‐way analysis of variance with a post hoc analysis using the least significant difference was applied. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). A threshold p‐value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3. RESULTS
3.1. PF4 decreases the cell proliferation and migration ability of BMMSCs
To explore the effects of PF4 on BMMSCs, the detection of cell proliferation or migration of BMMSCs was initially performed. The CCK8 assay indicated that the cell proliferation rate of the BMMSCs in the 0.2‐ and 1‐μg/mL PF4 groups was lower than that in the 0‐μg/mL PF4 and PF4 + heparin groups from Days 3 to 6 (Figure 1A). Furthermore, the cell cycle detected using FCM showed that the BMMSCs in the 0.2‐ and 1‐μg/mL PF4 groups had a markedly decreased proportion of cells in S phase compared to those in the CTL group. In addition, the proportion of cells in the S phase in the 1‐μg/mL PF4 group exhibited a significant decline compared to that in the PF4 + heparin group. Therefore, the cell counts in the G0/G1 and/or G2/M phase of the 0.2‐ and 1‐μg/mL PF4 groups dramatically increased compared with those in the CTL and PF4 + heparin groups (Figure 1B,C). Moreover, the relative expression of CDKN1B in the 0.2‐ and 1‐μg/mL PF4 groups was higher than that in the CTL and PF4 + heparin groups. Besides, the 1‐μg/mL PF4 group was associated with a dramatic increase in the relative expression of CDKN1B compared to the 0.2‐μg/mL PF4 group. Furthermore, the PF4 + heparin group exhibited a significant increase in the relative expression of CDKN1B compared to the CTL group. Moreover, the protein expression levels of CDKN1B were similar to the mRNA expression levels (Figure 1D).
In addition, a transwell assay demonstrated that the cell migration ability of BMMSCs in the 0.2‐ and 1‐μg/mL PF4 groups was lower than that of BMMSCs in the CTL and PF4 + heparin groups (Figure 1E).
3.2. PF4 attenuates the osteogenic differentiation ability of BMMSCs
For ALP staining and quantification, the 0.2‐ and 1‐μg/mL PF4 groups exhibited remarkably decreased ALP activity compared with the OM and PF4 + heparin groups. Furthermore, the PF4 + heparin group exhibited a significant increase in ALP activity compared with that of the CTL group and markedly decreased ALP activity compared to that of the OM group. Moreover, the ALP activity of the OM and 0.2‐μg/mL PF4 groups was higher than that of the CTL group (Figure 2A,B).
For ARS staining and quantification, the absorbance of the ARS solution dissolved in calcium nodules in the 0.2‐ and 1‐μg/mL PF4 groups was lower than that in the OM and PF4 + heparin groups and higher than that in the CTL group, which was consistent with the ALP quantification results. Moreover, the 1‐μg/mL PF4 group exhibited a remarkable decrease in the absorbance of the ARS solution compared with that of the 0.2‐μg/mL PF4 group. Moreover, the OM and PF4 + heparin groups exhibited a significant increase in the absorbance of the ARS solution compared to that of the CTL group (Figure 2A,C).
3.3. Trends of PF4 concentration in BM and serum post OVX
To explore the relationship between the levels of PF4 and OVX‐triggered bone destruction, the variation tendency of the PF4 levels in the serum and BM was investigated in OVX and sham mice. In general, the level of PF4 was increased in OVX mice compared with that of the sham group, whereas the bone mass and microarchitecture were deteriorated due to OVX. In detail, the concentrations of serum PF4 demonstrated a significant increase after OVX, interrupted only by a temporary through/dip at ~6–8 weeks (Figure 3A). Consistent with serum PF4, the concentrations of PF4 in the BM also had a significant increase from 2 weeks, interrupted only by a temporary through/dip at ~4 weeks (Figure 3B). Moreover, the variation tendency of the relative expression of Pf4 in the BM was analogous to the PF4 concentration in the BM and exhibited a more robust change (Figure 3C). As expected, the femurs of OVX mice exhibited severe bone loss at 6 and 12 weeks compared with those of sham mice (Figure 3D; Figure S1).
3.4. Supplementation with PF4 triggers bone destruction
To further investigate the effects on PF4‐triggered bone destruction, BMD and bone microarchitecture were evaluated. In short, the BMD and bone microarchitecture of the femur decreased with increasing doses of mPF4 injection. In particular, the 2‐ and 5‐μg PF4 groups exhibited a significant decrease in Ma. BMD, bone volume/total volume (BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb. Th), and trabecular number (Tb. N), as well as a substantial decrease in the bone surface area/bone volume (BS/BV) compared with those in the CTL group. Moreover, the 5‐μg PF4 group exhibited a lower Ma. BMD compared to that in the 2‐μg PF4 group, as well as a higher trabecular separation (Tb. Sp) than in the CTL group (Figure 4A,B). As expected, the levels of PF4 in the serum and BM in the 2‐ and 5‐μg PF4 groups significantly increased compared to those in the CTL group. Additionally, the concentrations of PF4 in the serum and BM in the 5‐μg PF4 group exhibited significant increases compared to those in the 2‐μg PF4 group (Figure 4C).
In addition, there was a remarkable decline in the mineral apposition rate and bone formation rate/bone surface (BFR/BS) of the 2‐ and 5‐μg PF4 groups compared to that of the CTL group (Figure 5).
3.5. PF4 inhibits the ITGA5‐FAK‐ERK pathway to reduce the osteogenic differentiation of BMMSCs
Next, to investigate the underlying mechanisms of PF4‐mediated regulation of osteogenic differentiation of BMMSCs, some key regulators of osteogenesis were screened using qPCR. In particular, the 0.2‐ and 1‐μg/mL PF4 groups exhibited a significant decrease in the relative expression of RUNX2, SP7, and SPARC compared with that in the OM and PF4 + heparin groups. Moreover, the relative expression of the three aforementioned osteogenic genes (except for SP7) in the 1‐μg/mL PF4 group was lower than that in the 0.2‐μg/mL PF4 group (Figure 6A). Moreover, the protein expression levels of three osteogenic markers were similar to the mRNA expression levels of the aforementioned genes (Figure 6B).
Furthermore, the protein expression level of ITGA5 decreased in the ITGA5 interfering lentivirus group and increased in the ITGA5 overexpression lentivirus group compared with the control lentivirus group, which was similar to the protein expression levels of p‐FAK, p‐ERK1/2, and ALP (Figure 7).
4. DISCUSSION
This study revealed that PF4 widely decreased cell proliferation, cell cycle, cell migration, and osteogenic differentiation of BMMSCs. Therefore, research into the molecular mechanisms of osteogenesis validated the downregulation of several key regulators of osteogenesis, and the ITGA5‐FAK‐ERK pathway was inhibited due to PF4 supplementation. Further investigation demonstrated that the level of PF4 in the serum and BM generally increased, whereas the bone mass and microarchitecture deteriorated in mice as a result of OVX. Furthermore, in vivo supplementation with mPF4 triggered bone loss in mice due to the suppression of bone formation.
In the present study, the proliferation and cell cycle of BMMSCs were suppressed by PF4. Previous studies also validated the ability of PF4 to maintain the cell quiescence of HSCs to regulate the survival and self‐renewal of HSCs, 21 , 38 which was consistent with our results. It is important to note that it was moderate and reversible to suppress the cell proliferation and cell cycle of BMMSCs to promote cell survival and self‐renewal rather than cell death. Therefore, based on the in vivo and in vitro results, we speculated that at first, BMMSCs rapidly underwent proliferation and osteogenic differentiation to avoid quick bone loss after OVX. However, PF4 maintained the BMMSC population and pluripotency to prevent excessive BMMSC exhaustion. Finally, the balance was disrupted, and OVX‐induced bone loss occurred because of consistently high levels of PF4, which may indicate that it is more important to maintain the BMMSC population and pluripotency for the entire body than to rescue bone loss only. The BMMSC regulation requires further investigation.
Our previous study revealed that aspirin prompted in vitro cell migration and in vivo cell homing of adipose‐derived stromal cells 39 ; however, the associated mechanisms remain unknown. Interestingly, this study revealed that cell migration of BMMSCs was suppressed by PF4 in a dose‐dependent manner. Of note, recent research has supported the hypothesis that the systemic administration of aspirin induced a significant decrease in the level of PF4 in a rat model of periodontal disease. 40 , 41 Overall, these studies suggested that aspirin promoted the cellular migration of stem cells due to the inhibition of PF4 levels.
In addition, the results demonstrated that PF4 attenuated the osteogenic differentiation of BMMSCs; however, Chen et al. showed that ALP staining of the PF4 group was weaker than that of the CTL group, which was similar to the results of our study. 42 Further research revealed that PF4 downregulated five key regulators of osteogenesis and inhibited the ITGA5‐FAK‐ERK pathway to decrease the osteogenic differentiation of BMMSCs. Aidoudi et al. deemed that PF4 could interact with the integrins αvβ3/αvβ5/α5β1 to suppress endothelial cell adhesion and migration and further contribute to its antiangiogenic effect. 24 Moreover, the study by Kulkarni and Jackson revealed that platelet factor XIII limited platelet aggregate formation and thrombus growth by regulating the integrin αIIbβ3. 22 In addition, Lishko et al. demonstrated that leukocyte integrin Mac‐1 functions as a functional receptor for PF4. 23 In this study, we also found that PF4 could regulate ITGA5 to attenuate osteogenic differentiation, which is consistent with the findings of the aforementioned studies. It is important to note that recent research has validated that the integrin‐FAK‐ERK pathway plays a vital role in bone metabolism. For example, Viale‐Bouroncle et al. found that laminin regulated the osteogenic differentiation of dental follicle cells through the integrin α2β1‐FAK‐ERK pathway. 43 Moreover, Chandran et al. showed that a biocomposite scaffold containing the phytomolecule diosmin could promote osteoblast differentiation and bone regeneration in mouse BMMSCs through the integrin‐FAK‐ERK pathway. 44 In addition, Chen et al. reported that osteopontin increased the migration of chondrosarcoma cells through the integrin αvβ3, FAK, and ERK pathways. 45 Furthermore, another study found that osteopontin promoted MSC migration via the integrin β1, FAK, and ERK pathways. 46
In this study, we first found that the level of PF4 generally increased in OVX mice compared with sham mice. Of note, the levels of PF4 fluctuated twice prior to euthanasia rather than consistently increasing. In particular, the concentration of PF4 in the BM increased rapidly after OVX and peaked in the third week. However, the PF4 level declined quickly in the fourth week and slowly increased again between the 6th and 10th weeks. Surprisingly, the level of PF4 began to decline at 12 weeks. As expected, the variation tendency of the PF4 level in the serum was similar to that in BM. Considering that PF4 is stored in platelet α‐granules and can be quickly released into the serum or BM, 14 we speculated that the first peak of PF4 was from platelets. After PF4 in platelets became exhausted, PF4 was synthesized by megakaryocytes and gradually released into the serum or BM. 21 Therefore, the PF4 level increased again and was maintained at a higher level in OVX mice than in the sham group. Furthermore, we found that supplementation with PF4 triggered decreased BMD and deterioration of bone microarchitecture, which means that PF4 indeed played a key role in bone loss. Next, the correlation between PF4 and bone loss in postmenopausal women will be explored in the future.
There are some limitations of this study. In vivo mechanisms of increased PF4‐triggered bone loss should be explored to confirm the cause‐and‐effect relationship between PF4 and bone. In addition, treatments for bone loss triggered by PF4, such as PF4 neutralization antibodies, should be further investigated.
5. CONCLUSIONS
PF4 may be related to OVX‐induced bone loss triggered by the suppression of bone formation in vivo. Furthermore, PF4 alleviated BMMSC osteogenic differentiation by inhibiting the ITGA5‐FAK‐ERK pathway.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Hao Liu conceived and supervised the study, designed the experiments, and analyzed the data; Wei Li, Ranli Gu, Lijun Zeng, and Qiwei Zhang performed the experiments and analyzed the data. Wei Li and Ranli Gu wrote the manuscript; Qiwei Zhang and Wei Li revised the manuscript.
FUNDING INFORMATION
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81700935), the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (L222145), Clinical Medicine Plus X—Young Scholars Project, Peking University, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (PKU2023LCXQ017), and CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (2019‐I2M‐5‐038).
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
ETHICS STATEMENT
All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Peking University Health Science Center (approval number: LA2019019; Beijing, China).
Supporting information
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Ms. Yeqing Song at Central Laboratory, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, for assistance with Flow cytometer.
Li W, Zhang Q, Gu R, Zeng L, Liu H. Platelet factor 4 induces bone loss by inhibiting the integrin α5‐FAK‐ERK pathway. Anim Models Exp Med. 2023;6:573‐584. doi: 10.1002/ame2.12342
Wei Li and Qiwei Zhang have contributed equally to this study.
REFERENCES
- 1. Lane JM, Russell L, Khan SN. Osteoporosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;372:139‐150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Srivastava M, Deal C. Osteoporosis in elderly: prevention and treatment. Clin Geriatr Med. 2002;18(3):529‐555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Reid IR. A broader strategy for osteoporosis interventions. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2020;16(6):333‐339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Deeks ED. Denosumab: a review in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Drugs Aging. 2018;35(2):163‐173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Tominaga A, Wada K, Kato Y, Nishi H, Terayama Y, Okazaki K. Early clinical effects, safety, and appropriate selection of bone markers in romosozumab treatment for osteoporosis patients: a 6‐month study. Osteoporos Int. 2021;32(4):653‐661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Reid IR. Targeting sclerostin in postmenopausal osteoporosis: focus on Romosozumab and Blosozumab. BioDrugs. 2017;31(4):289‐297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Qi M, Zhang L, Ma Y, et al. Autophagy maintains the function of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells to prevent estrogen deficiency‐induced osteoporosis. Theranostics. 2017;7(18):4498‐4516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Chen W, Chen X, Chen AC, et al. Melatonin restores the osteoporosis‐impaired osteogenic potential of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells by preserving SIRT1‐mediated intracellular antioxidant properties. Free Radic Biol Med. 2020;146:92‐106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ma Y, Qi M, An Y, et al. Autophagy controls mesenchymal stem cell properties and senescence during bone aging. Aging Cell. 2018;17(1):e12709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Kiernan J, Davies JE, Stanford WL. Concise review: musculoskeletal stem cells to treat age‐related osteoporosis. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2017;6(10):1930‐1939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Wang X, Liang T, Qiu J, et al. Melatonin reverses the loss of stemness induced by TNF‐alpha in human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells through upregulation of YAP expression. Stem Cells Int. 2019;2019:6568394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Liu Y, Wang L, Kikuiri T, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell‐based tissue regeneration is governed by recipient T lymphocytes via IFN‐gamma and TNF‐alpha. Nat Med. 2011;17(12):1594‐1601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Wei H, Xu Y, Wang Y, et al. Identification of fibroblast activation protein as an osteogenic suppressor and anti‐osteoporosis drug target. Cell Rep. 2020;33(2):108252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Huynh A, Arnold DM, Kelton JG, et al. Characterization of platelet factor 4 amino acids that bind pathogenic antibodies in heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia. J Thromb Hemost. 2019;17(2):389‐399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Pucci F, Rickelt S, Newton AP, et al. PF4 promotes platelet production and lung cancer growth. Cell Rep. 2016;17(7):1764‐1772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Struyf S, Burdick MD, Peeters E, et al. Platelet factor‐4 variant chemokine CXCL4L1 inhibits melanoma and lung carcinoma growth and metastasis by preventing angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2007;67(12):5940‐5948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Nazy I, Clare R, Staibano P, et al. Cellular immune responses to platelet factor 4 and heparin complexes in patients with heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia. J Thromb Hemost. 2018;16(7):1402‐1412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. De Luca C, Colangelo AM, Alberghina L, Papa M. Neuro‐immune hemostasis: homeostasis and diseases in the central nervous system. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Affandi AJ, Silva‐Cardoso SC, Garcia S, et al. CXCL4 is a novel inducer of human Th17 cells and correlates with IL‐17 and IL‐22 in psoriatic arthritis. Eur J Immunol. 2018;48(3):522‐531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Dubrac A, Quemener C, Lacazette E, et al. Functional divergence between 2 chemokines is conferred by single amino acid change. Blood. 2010;116(22):4703‐4711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Bruns I, Lucas D, Pinho S, et al. Megakaryocytes regulate hematopoietic stem cell quiescence through CXCL4 secretion. Nat Med. 2014;20(11):1315‐1320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Kulkarni S, Jackson SP. Platelet factor XIII and calpain negatively regulate integrin alphaIIbbeta3 adhesive function and thrombus growth. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(29):30697‐30706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Lishko VK, Yakubenko VP, Ugarova TP, Podolnikova NP. Leukocyte integrin mac‐1 (CD11b/CD18, alphaMbeta2, CR3) acts as a functional receptor for platelet factor 4. J Biol Chem. 2018;293(18):6869‐6882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Aidoudi S, Bujakowska K, Kieffer N, Bikfalvi A. The CXC‐chemokine CXCL4 interacts with integrins implicated in angiogenesis. PloS One. 2008;3(7):e2657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Su CY, Li JQ, Zhang LL, et al. The biological functions and clinical applications of integrins in cancers. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:579068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Moreno‐Layseca P, Icha J, Hamidi H, Ivaska J. Integrin trafficking in cells and tissues. Nat Cell Biol. 2019;21(2):122‐132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Saleem S, Li J, Yee SP, Fellows GF, Goodyer CG, Wang R. beta1 integrin/FAK/ERK signalling pathway is essential for human fetal islet cell differentiation and survival. J Pathol. 2009;219(2):182‐192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Chen J, Chen T, Zhu Y, et al. circPTN sponges miR‐145‐5p/miR‐330‐5p to promote proliferation and stemness in glioma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38(1):398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Flores‐Perez A, Rincon DG, Ruiz‐Garcia E, et al. Angiogenesis analysis by In vitro coculture assays in Transwell chambers in ovarian cancer. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1699:179‐186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Pozarowski P, Darzynkiewicz Z. Analysis of cell cycle by flow cytometry. Methods Mol Biol. 2004;281:301‐311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Fenelon M, Etchebarne M, Siadous R, et al. Assessment of fresh and preserved amniotic membrane for guided bone regeneration in mice. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2020;108(10):2044‐2056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Huang D, Hu H, Chang L, et al. Chinese medicine Bazi Bushen capsule improves lipid metabolism in ovariectomized female ApoE−/− mice. Ann Palliat Med. 2020;9(3):1073‐1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Hampel JA, Rinkinen J, Peterson JR, et al. Early development of the mouse Morphome. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(3):621‐626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Yamaji T, Ando K, Wolf S, Augat P, Claes L. The effect of micromovement on callus formation. J Orthop Sci. 2001;6(6):571‐575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Jiang Y, Luo W, Wang B, Wang X, Gong P, Xiong Y. Resveratrol promotes osteogenesis via activating SIRT1/FoxO1 pathway in osteoporosis mice. Life Sci. 2020;246:117422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Cui L, Xu S, Ma D, et al. The role of integrin‐alpha5 in the proliferation and odontogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells. J Endod. 2014;40(2):235‐240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Zhang L, Jiao G, Ren S, et al. Exosomes from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells enhance fracture healing through the promotion of osteogenesis and angiogenesis in a rat model of nonunion. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;11(1):38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Sinclair A, Park L, Shah M, et al. CXCR2 and CXCL4 regulate survival and self‐renewal of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Blood. 2016;128(3):371‐383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Liu H, Li W, Liu Y, Zhang X, Zhou Y. Co‐administration of aspirin and allogeneic adipose‐derived stromal cells attenuates bone loss in ovariectomized rats through the anti‐inflammatory and chemotactic abilities of aspirin. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Coimbra LS, Steffens JP, Muscara MN, Rossa C Jr, Spolidorio LC. Antiplatelet drugs reduce the immunoinflammatory response in a rat model of periodontal disease. J Periodontal Res. 2014;49(6):729‐735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Coimbra LS, Steffens JP, Rossa C Jr, Graves DT, Spolidorio LC. Clopidogrel enhances periodontal repair in rats through decreased inflammation. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41(3):295‐302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Chen JJ, Gao Y, Tian Q, Liang YM, Yang L. Platelet factor 4 protects bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells from acute radiation injury. Br J Radiol. 2014;87(1040):20140184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Viale‐Bouroncle S, Gosau M, Morsczeck C. Laminin regulates the osteogenic differentiation of dental follicle cells via integrin‐alpha2/−beta1 and the activation of the FAK/ERK signaling pathway. Cell Tissue Res. 2014;357(1):345‐354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Chandran SV, Vairamani M, Selvamurugan N. Osteostimulatory effect of biocomposite scaffold containing phytomolecule diosmin by integrin/FAK/ERK signaling pathway in mouse mesenchymal stem cells. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):11900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Chen YJ, Wei YY, Chen HT, et al. Osteopontin increases migration and MMP‐9 up‐regulation via alphavbeta3 integrin, FAK, ERK, and NF‐kappaB‐dependent pathway in human chondrosarcoma cells. J Cell Physiol. 2009;221(1):98‐108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Zou C, Luo Q, Qin J, et al. Osteopontin promotes mesenchymal stem cell migration and lessens cell stiffness via integrin beta1, FAK, and ERK pathways. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2013;65(3):455‐462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.