Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1991 Jan;95(1):46–51. doi: 10.1104/pp.95.1.46

Monoclonal Antibody Recognition of Abscisic Acid Analogs

Mary K Walker-Simmons 1,2,3,4,5, Martin J T Reaney 1,2,3,4,5, Stephen A Quarrie 1,2,3,4,5, Pierdomenico Perata 1,2,3,4,5, Paolo Vernieri 1,2,3,4,5, Suzanne R Abrams 1,2,3,4,5
PMCID: PMC1077483  PMID: 16667979

Abstract

Specificities of three monoclonal antibodies (15-I-C5, DBPA 1, and MAC 62) raised against the plant hormone (S)-(+)-abscisic acid (ABA) have been compared. Immunological cross-reactivities against fifteen biologically active analogs of ABA were measured. The ABA analogs were altered at one or more of four positions: the double bonds in the ring, at C-2 C-3 and at C-4 C-5, and in the oxidation level at C-1. Several analogs were optically active with chiral centers at C-1′ and C-2′. For cross-reactivity, all three monoclonal antibodies required the carboxylic acid group, and the cis configuration of the double bond at C-2 C-3 of the ABA molecule. Monoclonals 15-I-C5 and DBPA 1 required the entire ABA sidechain from the C-1 to C-1′, but these monoclonals did cross-react with analogs with the ring double bond reduced and the C-2′ methyl cis to the sidechain. Only MAC 62 recognized analogs containing an acetylene at C-4 C-5. MAC 62 had more strict requirements for the ring double bond, but gave some cross-reactivity with acetylenic analogs having a saturated ring. All three monoclonals had higher specificity for analogs having the same absolute configuration at C-1′ as (S)-(+)-ABA. This work provides new information about the spatial regions of the ABA molecule that elicit immunological recognition, and serves as a basis for future investigations of the ABA receptor using ABA analogs and anti-idiotypic antibodies.

Full text

PDF
47

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Gaulton G. N., Greene M. I. Idiotypic mimicry of biological receptors. Annu Rev Immunol. 1986;4:253–280. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.04.040186.001345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Milborrow B. V. The conformation of abscisic acid by n.m.r. and a revision of the proposed mechanism for cyclization during its biosynthesis. Biochem J. 1984 May 15;220(1):325–332. doi: 10.1042/bj2200325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Quarrie S. A., Galfre G. Use of different hapten-protein conjugates immobilized on nitrocellulose to screen monoclonal antibodies to abscisic acid. Anal Biochem. 1985 Dec;151(2):389–399. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(85)90193-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Skriver K., Mundy J. Gene expression in response to abscisic acid and osmotic stress. Plant Cell. 1990 Jun;2(6):503–512. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.6.503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Walker-Simmons M. ABA Levels and Sensitivity in Developing Wheat Embryos of Sprouting Resistant and Susceptible Cultivars. Plant Physiol. 1987 May;84(1):61–66. doi: 10.1104/pp.84.1.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES